1789 States Reorganisation [22 AUGUST 1956] Bill, 1956 I79O Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1789 States Reorganisation [22 AUGUST 1956] Bill, 1956 I79O of Procedure and Conduct of Business in SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA (West Ben Lok Sabha, I am directed to inform you gal) : Sir. 1 would like to make a sub that Lok Sabha at its sitting held on the mission. It is quite right that you are 20th August, 1956, agreed without any fixing this time-limit. But since we have amendment to the Industrial Disputes saved some time from the question (Amendment) Bill, 1956 which was passed Hour ............ by Rajya Sabha at its sitting held on the 10th May, 1956." MR. CHAIRMAN: Since we have saved I lay the following four Bills on the Table some time day before yesterday and since today we are extending the sitting from 5 (1) The Jammu and Kashmir O'clock to 6 O'clock, you will actually be (Extension of Laws) Bill, 1956. having 22 or 23 hours instead of the (2) The Supreme Court (Number of stipulated 20 hours. I have put the Minister's Judges) Bill, 1956. reply for tomorrow. So that is one hour and (3) The Indian Coconut Com- there is another hour in the evening from 5 mittee (Amendment) Bill, 1956. O'clock to 6 O'clock and if we are saved from interruptions, there will be a little more time. (4) The National Highways Bill, 1956. SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA: Now, Sir, I PETITIONS ON THE STATES suggest that ten hours have been fixed for REORGANISATION BILL, 1956 amendments. It may be possible to save some time there, and that time may be allotted for SECRETARY : Sir, I beg to report to the general discussion. House that I have received forty petitions relating to the States Reorganisation Bill, MR. CHAIRMAN : You cannot decide for 1956. the whole House. SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA: It is only a suggestion, Sir. PAPER LAID ON THE TABLE MR. CHAIRMAN: Dr. Kunzru. NOTIFICATION PUBLISHING THE IRON AND STEEL (CONTROL) ORDER, 1956 SHRI H. N. KUNZRU (Uttar Pradesh) : Mr. Chairman, the questions before us have THE MINISTER FOR HEAVY been under discussion for so long a time that INDUSTRIES (SHRI M. M. SHAH) : Sir, I beg to lay on the Table, under sub-section (6) of it is hardly possible to say anything new in section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, regard to them. Yet, as observations continue 1955, a copy of the Ministry of Commerce and to be made which are not in accordance with Industry Notification S.R.O. No. 1109J ESS. the facts, and as the States Reorganisation COMMjIron and Steel, dated the 8th May, Commission is still being charged with faults 1956, publishing the Iron and Steel (Control) of omission and commission, I think it is Order, 1956. [Placed in Library see No. S- necessary that I should make the position of 346J56.] the Commission clear once more in regard to these matters. THE STATES REORGANISATION BILL, 1956—continued. However, Sir, before I do so, I should like to refer to the manner in which the question MR. CHAIRMAN: Well, we are now going of the future of the Bombay State has been back to the States Reorganisation Bill. I have handled by the Government of India. before me a long list of speakers. I am calling upon Dr. Kunzru to open the discussion SHRI P. N. SAPRU (Uttar Pradesh). By today. As he happened to be a Member of the the Commission. States Reorganisation Commission, I am not insisting on any time-limit for him, But for SHRI H. N. KUNZRU: The hon. Member the rest it will be fifteen minutes. The House had his say the day before yesterday, and I will sit till 6 O'clock, and the Minister will hope he will listen patiently today to what I reply tomorrow. have to say ir 1791 Statu Reorganisation [RAJYA SABHA] BU, 1956 1792 [Shri H. N. Kunzru.] regard to the baseless [Shri H. N. Kunzru.] charges that he brought against the doing, there would have been no objection on Commission. the part of anybody to the people of (Interruption.) Ahmedabad attending that meeting. What created opposition to the meeting was the fear MR. CHAIRMAN: Order, order. that the presence of large numbers of people at Shri Morarji Desai's meeting would be SHRI H. N. KUNZRU: Sir, the Government regarded as a proof of their agreement with went on saying that they thought that the the Government of India in regard to their States Reorganisation Commission had latest proposal with regard to the future of the suggested the best solution for the Bombay Bombay State. question. Subsequently, Sir, they went on There is another important fact, Sir, which, putting forward proposals which gave offence we ought to bear in mind when considering to Maharashtra. And later on they proceeded this matter. in such a way as to offend Maha-Vidarbha too, and now they have succeeded in creating Shri Morarji Desai was to address a public dissatisfaction in Gujarat also. The handling meeting on Sunday. Another public meeting of this question by the Government has been was held on Monday but not under the tragic indeed. They have come back to the auspices of the Congress Committee, and it principle of bilinguism which, in spite of their was attended by about a lakh of peopie. Now, theoretical support for it, they discarded under surely the presence of the people in such large pressure. But they have done it in such a way numbers at the Ahmedabad meeting could not as to dissatisfy most of the people of that area have been due to pressure of any kind. It is where this principle was not disputed by any thus doubly clear that the people who large section of the people. What has refrained from attending or who were happened recently in Gujarat is well-known. prevented from attending Mr. Desai's meeting The developments that have taken place were not generally in favour of the solution during the last few days have made the Chief suggested by Government. Minister of Bombay go on an indefinite fast. SHRI R. U. AGNIBHOJ (Madhya Pradesh) Sir, Shri Morarji Desai has made sacrifices for : Was there picketing in the next day's the sake of his country. The fast that he has meeting also? undertaken must therefore be a matter of concern to all people, irrespective of their SHRI H. N. KUNZRU: There was no party connections. But while we have great picketing at all but there was no obligation on respect for Shri Morarji Desai, it is scarcely the part of the people to attend that meeting possible for some of us at least to agree with in such large numbers. him in the step that he has taken. According to the statement issued by him, he has SHRI S. N. MAZUMDAR (West Bengal) : undertaken this fast in order to purge the That is what they cannot understand. atmosphere of Gujarat of violence which he SHRI H. N. KUNZRU: That is a fact which detected ever since he went to Ahmedabad. my hon. friend ought to bear in mind when And his contention is that the people were considering this matter. I do not know what prevented from attending a public meeting the future has in store. It has been suggested that he was to address, by force. in official quarters that the present state of feeling in Gujarat will be short-lived, that it is Now, Sir, wherever there is picketing, the result of a misleading agitation carried on there is, I grant, a certain amount of force, and by some people and that the acceptance of the the pickelers in Ahmedabad may, in certain solution suggested by Government will soon cases, have easily overstepped the limits of become general throughout Gujarat. 1 should propriety. But I am sure, Sir, that had it been certainly, being in favour of the principle of made clear to the people that their presence at bilinguism, be extremely happy if the people the meeting that was to be addressed by Shri of Gujarat accepted the new bilingual State. I Morarji Desai would not be regarded as an have no doubt that in the interests both of indication of their support for what the Maharashtra and Gujarat a bilingual State is Government were not merely desirable but 1793 Statu Reorganisation [22 AUGUST 1956] Bill, 1956 1794 necessary. But we have to remember that statement which was specific and Government proceeded for the past six or which showed that no Cabinet meeting seven months in such a way as to create the was held between, I believe, the 11th impression that two unilingual States were and 15th January 1956............ going to be created in place of one bilingual State. Now, suddenly they have changed their SHRI V. K. DHAGE (Hyderabad) : 16th course and they expect the people to adjust January. their minds to the new situation as quickly as they have been able to. If 1 may use the SHRI H. N. KUNZRU :.............and 16th language that was used by Shri Deogirikar the January when a change was made in the other day, the moral of all this is that great previous decision with regard to Bombay. questions should be handled in a great way, This question has been debated in the other that whatever the strength of the Government House. I do not want, therefore, to go into it in this House may be, the people still count at length, but the manner in which the for something and that their wishes cannot be Cabinet functions, the Government functions, totally ignored in the settlement of a question is a matter of great concern to us.