DOCSLIB.ORG

European Elections Why Vote? English

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Elections Why Vote? English Europea2n E0lecti1ons9 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS WHY VOTE? ENGLISH Czech Republic Results of the 24-25 May 2019 European elections Show 10 entries Search: Trend European Number of Percentage of Number of Political Parties compared affiliation votes votes seats with 2014 ANO 2011 Renew Europe 502 343 21.18% 6 ↑ Civic Democratic Party ECR 344 885 14.54% 4 ↑ Pirate Party Greens/EFA 330 844 13.95% 3 TOP 09 & STAN (Mayors and EPP 276 220 11.65% 3 Independents) Freedom and Direct Identity and 216 718 9.14% 2 Democracy Democracy Christian and Democratic EPP 171 723 7.24% 2 ↑ Union – Czechoslovak People's Party Communist Party of GUE/NGL 164 624 6.94% 1 ↓ Bohemia and Moravia Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries Previous Next List of MEPs Jiř Pospíšil STAN & TOP09 (Mayors and Independents) EPP Stanislav Polčák STAN & TOP09 (Mayors and Independents) EPP Ludek Niedermayer STAN & TOP09 (Mayors and Independents) EPP Tomáš Zdechovský Christian and Democratic Union - Czechoslovak People's Party (KDU-CSL) EPP Michaela Šojdrová Christian and Democratic Union - Czechoslovak People's Party (KDU-CSL) EPP Dita Charanzová ANO- YES 2011 Renew Europe Martina Dlabajová ANO- YES 2011 Renew Europe Martin Hlaváček ANO- YES 2011 Renew Europe Radka Maxová ANO- YES 2011 Renew Europe Ondřej Knotek ANO- YES 2011 Renew Europe Ondřej Kovařík ANO- YES 2011 Renew Europe Marcel Kolaja Pirate Party Greens/EFA Markéta Gregorová Pirate Party Greens/EFA Mikuláš Peksa Pirate Party Greens/EFA Ivan David Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD) Identity and Democracy Hynek Blaško Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD) Identity and Democracy Colonne Jan Zahradil Civic Democratic Party (ODS) ECR Evžen Tošenovský Civic Democratic Party (ODS) ECR Veronika Vrecionová Civic Democratic Party (ODS) ECR Alexandr Vondra Civic Democratic Party (ODS) ECR Kateřina Konečná Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia GUE/NGL Lists for the elections on 24-25 May 2019 European Leading Name of party Translation Website Programme affiliation candidate Křesťanská a demokratická Christian and Democratic EPP Pavel kdu.cz Programme unie - Československá strana Union – Czechoslovak Svoboda lidová (KDU-CSL) People's Party TOP 09 & STAN TOP 09 & STAN (Mayors EPP Jiří Pospíšil top09.cz Programme and Independents) stan.cz Česká strana sociálně Czech Social Democratic S&D Pavel Poc cssd.cz Programme demokratická (CSSD) Party Občanská demokratická strana Civic Democratic Party ECR Jan Zahradil ods.cz Programme (ODS) ANO 2011 YES 2011 ALDE Dita ano.cz Programme Charanzová Hlas The Voice ALDE Pavel Telička hnutihlas.cz Programme Komunistická strana Čech a Communist Party of GUE/NGL Kateřina kscm.cz Programme Moravy (KSCM) Bohemia and Moravia Konečná Pirátská strana Pirate Party Greens/EFA Marcel pirati.cz Programme Kolaja Strana svobodných občanů Svobodni (Party of Free EFDD Vít Jedlička svobodni.cz Programme (Svobodni) Citizens) Svoboda a přímá demokracie - Freedom and Direct ENF Ivan David spd.cz Programme SPD Democracy Agrární demokratická strana Agrarian Democratic Party / Pavel adstrana.cz Programme (ADS) Šrámek Aliance národních sil National Forces Alliance / Jiří aliancenarodnichsil.cz Programme Černohorský Alternativa pro Českou Alternative for the Czech / Klára apcr.cz Programme republiku 2017 (APAČI) Republic 2017 Samková ANO, vytrollíme Yes, Let's Clear the / Jiří Kyjovský eutroll.cz Programme europarlament European Parliament Bezpečnost, odpovědnost, Movement BOS - Safety / Jaroslav hnutibos.cz Programme solidarita - Hnutí BOS Responsibility Solidarity Bašta Cesta odpovědné společnosti - The Path of Responsible / Antonín hnuticesta.cz Programme Hnutí Cesta Society Baudyš Česká Suverenita Czech Sovereignty / David Rath ceskasuverenita.cz Programme Dělnická strana sociální Workers' Party of Social / Tomáš dss.cz Programme spravedlnosti – Za národní Justice - For National Vandas suverenitu! (Koalice) Sovereignty! Demokratická strana zelených Green Democratic Party / Andrea dsz.cz Programme Bychlová Evropa společně Europe Together / Jaromíra evropaspolecne.cz Štětina Jistota Solidarita Investice pro Certainty Solidarity / Petr Kováč jsipro.cz budoucnost Investing for the Future Klub angažovaných nestraníků Club of Committed Non- / Jiří Domlátil kan.cz Programme Party Members Konzervativní alternativa A Conservative Alternative / František chnj.cz Programme Němec Moravané Moravané / Tomáš Ingr moravane.cz Programme Moravské zemské hnutí The Moravian Land / Ševčík moravskehnuti.cz Programme Movement Vladan Národní socialisté National Socialists / Ivan Sterzl narsoc.cz Programme NE-VOLIM I do not like / Josef ne-volim.cz Programme Zahradník Patrioti pro neutralitu Patriots for Neutrality / Jiří Vítek stranapatrioti.cz Programme Pro Česko For the Czech Republic / Radek Kňava PRO Zdraví a Sport For Health and Sport / Václav prozdraviasport.cz Programme Kubata První republika First Republic / Matouš Bulíř 1918-1938.cz Programme Romská demokratická strana Roma Democratic Party / Miroslav romea.cz Tancoš European Leading Name of party Translation Website Programme affiliation candidate ROZUMNÍ a Národní Reasonable National / Adam B. rozumni.cz Programme demokracie - Stop Migraci - Democracy - Stop Bartoš Nechceme Euro Migration - No Euro Sdružení pro republiku - Rally for the Republic – / Miroslav spr-rsc.cz Republikánská strana Republican Party of Sládek Československa Czechoslovakia Strana nezávislosti České Independence Party of the / František strananezavislosti.cz Programme republiky Czech Republic Matějka Strana soukromníků České Private Party of the Czech / Josef strananezavislosti.cz Republiky Republic Valihrach Tvůj kandidát Your Candidate / Daniel tvujkandidat.cz Programme Konečný Vědci pro Českou republiku Scientists for the Czech / Ivan vedciprocr.cz Programme Republic Holoubek Volte Pravý Blok Right Block / Petr Cibulka Electoral Procedures > Election Dates : 24 & 25 May 2019 > Number of MEPs: 21 > At what age can one vote? 18 years > At what age can one be elected? 21 years > Who can vote? European citizens living in Czech Republic. Electoral rules > Voting method : Preferential vote > Means for attributing seats : D’Hondt Method > Can candidates be chosen from a list? Yes Institutions and political situation Republic, parliamentary democracy (Constitution of December 16th 1992) – Head of State: Milos Zeman was the first president directly elected on 26th January 2013. He took office as President on 8th March 2013. – Head of Government: Prime Minister Andrej Babis leads a government coalition comprising the Social Democratic Party-CSSD (5 ministers), and the ANO (10 ministers) since 13th December 2017. Economy > Currency : Czech Crown (CZK) (exchange rate in January 2019: 1 € = 315.8800 CZK) > GDP : € 207,393 billion (2018)) > GDP per capita (PPS) : € 17,200 (2017) > GDP Growth : 2.8% (T4 2018) > Unemployment: 2.1% (January 2019) > Inflation : 2.4% (February 2019) > Public Debt : 33.9% of GDP (T3 2018) Geography and population Surface Area: 78,867 km² Population: 10.6 million inhabitants (2018) Printable version Download PDF file SHARE THIS PAGE ON Contact Archives 2004 Archives 2009 Archives 2014 Production : Digiplace © Robert Schuman Foundation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Czech Parliament and EU Affairs Martin Hrabálek, Masaryk University and Alexander Strelkov, Phd Student, Maastricht University
    OPAL Country Reports The Czech Parliament and EU Affairs Martin Hrabálek, Masaryk University and Alexander Strelkov, PhD Student, Maastricht University To cite this report: M. Hrabálek & A. Strelkov (2012), OPAL Country Reports: The Czech Parliament and EU Affairs, weblink September 2012 OPAL Country Report on the Czech Parliament, September 2012 OPAL Country Report on the Czech Parliament1 Martin Hrabálek, Masaryk University and Alexander Strelkov, PhD student, Maastricht University 1. General Position of Parliament in the Constitutional Balance of the Member State: Constitutional and institutional factors This section looks at the role of Parliament in the political system, to help us understand the relative power position of the legislature. What is the type of government in the political system of your member state? 1.1 (i.e. parliamentary or semi-presidential) The Czech state is a parliamentary republic. From 2013 direct elections of the president are to be introduced. This doesn’t affect the competences of the president, which stay mainly symbolic, but can arguably increase the legitimacy of the post. This argument might be underlined by the fact, that the post has been occupied by two very strong personalities since 1993 – Václav Havel and Václav Klaus, that both expanded the influence of the office beyond the institutional framework. An introduction of direct elections also required a constitutional amendment that has been adopted by the two chambers of the Czech republic in July 2012. None of the political parties seem to have defined their candidates for the presidential post before the amendment was adopted. The measure to introduce direct presidential elections was much contested by the members of the expert community.
    [Show full text]
  • En Irak 07.Qxd
    THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THE IRAQ CRISIS: SHAPING THE CZECH STANCE David Kr·l, Luk·ö Pachta Europeum Institute for European Policy, January 2005 Table of contens Executive Summary. 5 1. Introduction . 7 2. The President 1. Constitutional framework . 11 2. Havel versus Klaus . 13 3. The Presidentís position on the Iraq crisis . 15 3. The Government 1. Constitutional framework . 21 2. Governmental resolution: articulation of the Czech position. 22 3. Continuity of foreign policy ñ the Czech Republic and the ëcoalition of the willingí. 23 4. Political constellation within government . 26 5. Proposal of the Foreign Ministry . 27 6. Acceptance of the governmental position . 29 7. The power of personalities . 30 4. The Parliament 1. General framework. 35 2. Debate and role of the Parliament before the initiation of the Iraqi operation . 36 3. The Chamber of Deputies ñ critique by the opposition . 38 4. The Senate debate ñ lower influence of the political parties, higher influence of personalities . 39 5. Parliamentary discussion during the Iraq crisis. 42 6. Discussion on the dispatching of a field hospital to Basra . 43 5. The Political Parties 1. Czech Social Democratic Party (»SSD): Ambivalent workhorse of the Czech government . 50 2. Antiwar resolution of the »SSD Congress: A blow for the »SSD in government. 51 3. Smaller coalition parties: pro-American but constructive and loyal . 54 4. Civic Democratic Party (ODS): Clear position, weak critique of the government and conflict with Klaus . 55 5. Communist party (KS»M): Weak in influence but strong in rhetoric . 57 6. Conclusion . 59 7. Annexes. (in Czech version only) 3 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY David Kr·l has been the chairman of EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy since ■ The Czech government expressed political support for the general objectives of 2000 where he also serves as the director of EU policies programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Troublesome Concept of Sovereignty – the Czech Debate on European Unity 1 MATS BRAUN
    722L The Troublesome Concept of Sovereignty – the Czech debate on European Unity 1 MATS BRAUN Abstract: How the European Union is conceptualised in the national and public polit- ical debates restricts the European policy options available to that state. It is therefore of interest to see which conceptions of the EU dominate in a country, and to understand how these can be identified and interpreted. This paper outlines a framework for discourse analysis and then applies it to the Czech public discourse on the European Union. I de- scribe how the debate can be analysed according to three different ideal types of legitima- tion, based on 1) an instrumental rationalisation, 2) a “we feeling”, 3) a “good argument”. I argue that any single actor will likely use arguments drawing upon all three levels, and I conclude that the Eurosceptics (Euro-realists) associated with the Civic Democratic Par- ty came to see EU membership as a “marriage of convenience”, a necessary evil, because their arguments went in two incompatible directions. According to the third ideal type, they had to favour membership as good for the national interest, in economic terms. Si- multaneously, this conflicted with the other two levels due to their belief that the EU is a threat to national sovereignty, and their conception of the nation state as the only legiti- mate arena for democratic decision-making. Advocates of membership, such as Prime Minister Špidla, had a more inclusive conception of the EU, enabling the argument that the EU strengthens nation states in globalising times. Key words: discourse analysis, legitimacy, European integration, the Czech Republic INTRODUCTION In this article I approach the question of how to identify and interpret con- testing conceptions of the European Union in political and public discourses.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Republic
    Czech Republic Lists of candidates 21 seats Křesťanská a demokratická unie - Československá strana lidová (KDU-ČSL) – Christian and Democratic Union – Czechoslovak People’s Party (EPP) Svoboda Pavel Hladík Petr Hořínek Michal Šojdrová Michaela Novotný Jan Haverová Martina Zdechovský Tomáš Odstrčilová Zdislava Holejšovský Josef Hulicius Eduard Heller Šimon Málek Jan Jílková Marie Budil Ivo Adensamová Fay Přádka Miroslav Kumstýřová Zdenka Ulrych Vít Jirsa Jiří Vencl Jiří Hladký Jan Šustr Pavel Svoboda Tomáš Lajkep Tomáš Vysloužil Petr John František Matek Štěpán Steiner Leo Tradice, Odpovědnost, Prosperita 09 (TOP 09) – Tradition, Responsability, Prosperity 09 (PPE) Niedermayer Luděk Polach Marek Bubeníková Ludmila Pospíšil Jiří Mikulecký Luděk Souček Oldřich Polčák Stanislav Kyliánová Zuzana Janoušek Aleš Šarapatka Bořivoj Cogan Rudolf Gábor František Štětina Jaromír Kočandrle Jiří Feigler Michal Sršeň Radim Ifrah Reda Popov Simeon Czernin Tomáš Pavlíčková Klára Šigut Zdeněk Majíčková Ivana Burian Michal Kalousek Josef Straka Bohumil Merta Josef Šanc Ivo Velička Tomáš Česká strana sociálně demokratická (ČSSD) –Czech Social democrat Party (PES) Keller Jan Osvald Petr Kalistová Kateřina. Sehnalová Olga Vorel Lukáš Drobek Aleš Poc Pavel Zemánek Jiří Bocianová Kateřina Poche Miroslav Kaucký Lukáš Hermannová Monika Seidl Zdeněk Technik Radim Andělová Alena Falbr Richard Šáda Petr Kolman Petr Brzobohatá Zuzana Váhalová Dana. Vodsloň Zuzana Mynář Vojtěch Scherfer Radek Tomková Ivana Rouček Libor Balabán Miloš Straka Jan Občanská demokratická strana (ODS) – Civic Democrate Party (AECR) Zahradil Jan MEP Tošenovský Evžen MEP Zamrazilová Eva Vlasák Oldřich MEP Hejtmánek Pavel Nguyen Cong Hung Musil Aleš Stárek Jakub Kropáčová Marcela Trylčová Radka Šulc Jan Seitz Václav Kollmann Marcel Šindelář Petr Vítek Lukáš Hynek Josef Kulhánek Rudolf Kovačíková Darina.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-27 Watch No 8
    EU-27 WATCH No. 8 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in March 2009 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Sofia Academy of Sciences, Budapest Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Institute for Strategic and International Studies, University, Ankara Lisbon Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Institute of International and European Affairs, Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Dublin Bruxelles Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of International Relations and Political Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Science, Vilnius University Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Latvian Institute of International Affairs, International Studies, Nicosia Riga Danish Institute for International Studies, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, Copenhagen University of Malta Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Netherlands Institute of International Relations European Institute of Romania, Bucharest ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Federal Trust for Education and Research, London Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: “We Don´T Want Islam in Czech Republic”
    Case Study: We Don´t Want Islam in Czech Republic Jaroslav Valuch May 2018 Summary Martin Konvicka, co-founder and leader of the “We Don't Want Islam in Czech Republic” initiative (Islám v České republice nechceme – IVCRN) and one of its derivative movements, “Bloc Against Islam,” is currently under police investigation and awaiting trial for inciting hatred via comments on the Facebook page of the initiative. Inciting hatred against a group of persons or restricting their rights is a criminal offence according to the Czech legal code. This initiative started in 2009 as a very successful Facebook page community (the page had up to 160,000 followers in January 2016 before it was blocked by Facebook). It then morphed into a political movement with aspirations to gain representation in the Senate and parliament. At the height of his public political career, Konvicka and Bloc Against Islam received the endorsement of the President of the Czech Republic, who publicly supported the initiative by delivering a speech on their stage on November 17th 2015, the National Day of Fighting for Freedom and Democracy (anniversary of 1989 Velvet revolution). Konvicka decided to run in the Senate election in October 2016 with his new initiative called Alternative for Czech Republic (directly inspired by the German Alternative fur Deutschland). His run ended in failure, and he finished second from the bottom. Dangerous Speech Framework Analysis Social and Historical Context Since the rise of violent right-wing extremism after the Czech Velvet Revolution in 1989, measures to counter extremism (such as the training of security forces and the adoption of extremism and hate crime legislation) have been gradually implemented.1 The threat has received serious attention from even the highest political figures.
    [Show full text]
  • (SRHR) in European Institutions. by Elena
    Study for POLICY MAKERS on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions. by Elena Zacharenko Anti-gender mobilisations in Europe Study for policy makers on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions Author: Elena Zacharenko This study has been commissioned by Heidi Hautala MEP, Vice President of the European Parliament. Published in December 2020 Book cover illustration, design and layout by Laura Ospina - www.lauraennube.com 2 Table of CONTENTS Foreword from MEP Heidi Hautala.............................................................04 Executive summary.......................................................................................06 What is this study and who is it for? ........................................................... 08 Part 1: What drives the anti-gender movement?...........................................10 1.1 Origins and current manifestations...........................................................12 1.2 Global connections ..................................................................................13 1.3 The anti-gender movement in the EU...................................................... 16 1.4 Is it a backlash?........................................................................................23 1.5 Recommendations...................................................................................24 Part 2: Main anti-gender actors and their tactics at EU level........................26 2.1 Lobbying organisations
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE Český Stranický Systém a Jeho Vývoj
    UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH VĚD Institut politologických studií Michael Rozsypal Český stranický systém a jeho vývoj po roce 1989 Liberální strany v českém stranickém systému Bakalářská práce Praha 2012 Autor práce: Michael Rozsypal Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Jan Charvát, M.A., Ph.D. Rok obhajoby: 2012 Bibliografický záznam Rozsypal, Michael. Český stranický systém a jeho vývoj po roce 1989: Liberální strany v českém stranickém systému. Praha, 2012. 52 s. Bakalářská práce (Bc.) Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Institut politologických studií. Vedoucí bakalářské práce Mgr. Jan Charvát, M.A., Ph.D. Abstrakt Práce se zabývá vývojem českého stranického systému po přechodu k demokracii po roce 1989. Výzkum se zaměřuje především na vývoj liberálních stran a jejich ukotvení v českém stranickém systému. Liberálním stranám se v České republice dlouhodobě nedaří udržet vysokou přízeň voličů. Cílem práce je analyzovat vznik, vývoj a případný rozpad liberálních stran a zodpovědět otázku, proč se strany nemohou etablovat ve středu politického spektra. Výsledky sněmovních voleb pravidelně ukazují, že je zde prostor získat 7-15% hlasů především z řad střední třídy, intelektuálů a městských voličů, přesto se žádnému subjektu v polistopadovém vývoji nepodařilo tuto podporu udržet déle než jedno volební období. V práci je popsán vznik a vývoj liberalismu ve světě i v českých zemích, je popsáno jeho zařazení v pravolevém dělení politického spektra i rozdíl mezi politickým a ekonomickým liberalismem. Páteří práce jsou výsledky voleb, především těch sněmovních, s čímž souvisí vývoj českého stranického systému. Vlastní kapitola je věnována liberálním stranám v minulosti i současnosti a v závěru práce je odpovídáno na v úvodu položené výzkumné otázky.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's European Question and an In/Out Referendum
    To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britain’s European question and an in/out referendum TIM OLIVER* ‘It is time to settle this European question in British politics.’ David Cameron, 23 January 2013.1 Britain’s European question It came as no surprise to those who follow the issue of the European Union in British politics that David Cameron’s January 2013 speech on Europe excited a great deal of comment. The EU is among the most divisive issues in British politics. Cameron himself drew on this to justify his committing the Conservative Party, should it win the general election in 2015, to seek a renegotiated position for the UK within the EU which would then be put to the British people in an in/out referendum. Growing public frustrations at UK–EU relations were, he argued, the result of both a longstanding failure to consult the British people about their country’s place in the EU, and a changing EU that was undermining the current relationship between Britain and the Union. As a result, he argued, ‘the democratic consent for the EU in Britain is now wafer-thin’. Cameron’s speech was met with both criticism and praise from Eurosceptics and pro-Europeans alike.2 In a speech at Chatham House backing Cameron’s plan, the former Conservative prime minister Sir John Major best captured some of the hopes for a referendum: ‘The relationship with Europe has poisoned British politics for too long, distracted parliament from other issues and come close to destroying the Conservative Party.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 YEARS of EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and Subjugated
    European Parliament – 50th birthday QA-70-07-089-EN-C series 1958–2008 Th ere is hardly a political system in the modern world that does not have a parliamentary assembly in its institutional ‘toolkit’. Even autocratic or totalitarian BUILDING PARLIAMENT: systems have found a way of creating the illusion of popular expression, albeit tamed 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and subjugated. Th e parliamentary institution is not in itself a suffi cient condition for granting a democratic licence. Yet the existence of a parliament is a necessary condition of what 1958–2008 we have defi ned since the English, American and French Revolutions as ‘democracy’. Since the start of European integration, the history of the European Parliament has fallen between these two extremes. Europe was not initially created with democracy in mind. Yet Europe today is realistic only if it espouses the canons of democracy. In other words, political realism in our era means building a new utopia, that of a supranational or post-national democracy, while for two centuries the DNA of democracy has been its realisation within the nation-state. Yves Mény President of the European University Institute, Florence BUILDING PARLIAMENT: BUILDING 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN OF YEARS 50 ISBN 978-92-823-2368-7 European Parliament – 50th birthday series Price in Luxembourg (excluding VAT): EUR 25 BUILDING PARLIAMENT: 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY 1958–2008 This work was produced by the European University Institute, Florence, under the direction of Yves Mény, for the European Parliament. Contributors: Introduction, Jean-Marie Palayret; Part One, Luciano Bardi, Nabli Beligh, Cristina Sio Lopez and Olivier Costa (coordinator); Part Two, Pierre Roca, Ann Rasmussen and Paolo Ponzano (coordinator); Part Three, Florence Benoît-Rohmer; Conclusions, Yves Mény.
    [Show full text]