Hearing on the Hoosac Tunnel Consolidation, Before The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hearing on the Hoosac Tunnel Consolidation, Before The : REPORT OF THE FOUETH HEAEING HOOSAC TTJMEL CONSOLIDATION, BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON RAILWAYS. February 5, 1873 BOSTON WRIGHT & POTTER, STATE PRINTER No. 19 Province Street. 1873. — FOURTH HEARING. Mr. Daniel Robinson, vice-president of the Troy and Greenfield Railroad, was recalled, and made the following cpncluding statement : Mr. Robinson's Concluding Statement. Mr. Bates. —With reference to the business that there would be on the line of this road, have you anything further to state ? What do you think of its* prospects ? Mr. Robinson.—The committee, I presume, are as aware as I am, that any such statement as perhaps I was approaching when giving my testimony here, would be in a great measure conjectural ; and yet it forms the foundation for every enterprise that has its inception in the fact that, if a railroad is built, business will come to it. In creating this railroad we take into consideration what we are going to receive. This, of course, is what is of interest in the minds of those upon the line of the road. It has formed a part of the information that we have attempted to gain in giving us security in the investment of our capital. Of course, being at the west end of the line, my idea has been to see what we could secure to come to us. We leave it for our friends to show what would go to them. My relation as a railroad man for the last twenty years, has brought me into contact with the West and with the Western roads. In 1862-64 we formed a line of railroad from the West to Boston, and the business that the Western roads gave us by the New York Central perfectly blocked us, and we have often had 300 cars of the Rutland Company's road that could not be taken over the mountain. My relation with these gentlemen as an agent has been intimate, and my intercourse with them has been frequent, and I have no hes- itation in saying that, west of Buffalo and Niagara Falls, all would have just as great interest in the opening of this Tun- nel, and if you could get at the sentiment of the directors you would find them just as desirous that this road should be done, as we are ourselves. I don't know that I am familiar with any other argument that goes to show that we shall have business. They have said it at home, privately and pub- licly, and I think they can do it. It is a well-known fact, that there is not a road between here and the Hudson River that is able to do the business in so prompt a manner, and in the manner in which it ought to be done, between here and the West. Mr. Bates. —I don't know that it is necessary to state any evidence, as to what I suppose everybody knows, that the New York Central road is at this time putting down a double track to accommodate its business, making four tracks in all. Mr. Robinson.—Their idea is that they shall start a freight train, and allow it to pass right on to tide water without any delay in passing passenger trains. Mr. Bates. —This is to be done on the whole road from Albany to Buffalo ? Mr, Robinson.—Yes, sir. Mr. Bates. —How much will that increase the capacity? Mr. Robinson. —It will make it more than double—con- siderably more ; because the delays of freight for passenger trains is very great. Col. George. —It will increase it nearly fourfold. Mr. Robinson. —I do not want to submit the idea that the New York Central is the only road that we have ; we have two at the present, and we are to have a third in a very short time. There is one road already through, and there is another being built, and then we have the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern. Mr. Bates. —This is destined chiefly for freight? Mr. Robinson.—Entirely for freight. Mr. Bates. —Are you acquainted with the bridge that is built at Albany, for the accommodation of the other roads? Mr. Robinson. —I see its operations there continually. Mr. Bates.—Do you know who it is owned by? Mr. Robinson. —One-half by the New York Central, one- quarter by the Hudson River, and a quarter by the Western Railroad. But since the first two were consolidated that gives, them a three-quarters interest. Mr. Bates. —Upon that bridge do cars of the different rail- roads all pass ? Mr. Robinson.—They do. , Mr. Bates. Whether or not there are any inconvenience' attending their passage ? Mr. Robinson. —Yes, sir ; but it is slight to what it would be if it were in the middle of a road instead of at the end of it. In coming into Albany from the West there is no delay, but from the Hudson River we have to slow up and see if the way is clear, and sometimes there is a delay. The river is .about a thousand feet wide. There is frequently from twelve to twenty-five minutes' delay from the time we come within a three or four minutes' time, before we reach the station. This occurs once in a week or two weeks. There is often an occurrence of a delay of five or ten minutes. The time-tables give the difference between the arrivals of the Central Rail- road trains at Albany, as twenty-five minutes to get across the river and leave Greenbush. In regard to this Tunnel I think no man who was dependent upon two authorities would allow us to go through it upon anything like express time. Mr. Bates. —Whether in your opinion this bridge could be managed so that if it were run over by locomotives only these delays could be avoided ? Mr. Robinson. —Yes, sir, more or less ; but I do not assume to say that any portion, or any piece of road, under any mountain, can be operated so as to give facilities to more than one line. It is an utter impossibility to create a road of a nature that this Tunnel was destined to create, and put two authorities upon it. The Tunnel is iive miles long ; we have leased a road of the State six miles long. Will anybody say that these roads could be operated by two roads with safety ? But there seems to be an impression or idea conveyed, that this Tunnel is a mere passage or gateway. Now our bridge at Albany in, only one thousand feet long, and an engineer is in no danger is coming up—flags can be seen ; this cannot be A done at the Tunnel. So far as I regard it, with the experi- 6 ence I have had, it must come under one management, and the branches must be subservient to the main line. Mr. Bates. —Whether or not there have been accidents upon this bridge ? Mr. Robinson. —1 think there have been more accidents upon approaches to that bridge than upon the whole line south of it. Collisions are frequent. The Chairman.—What are the tolls ? Mr. Robinson.—Twenty-five cents a ton on freight, and ten cents a piece for passengers. It was originally fifty cents, but has now been reduced to twenty-five. The Chairman. —Do I understand you to say that the present facilities are sufficient to bring the Western trade to Albaoy ? Mr. Robinson.—No, sir. I said it would be an utter im- possibility for the present lines, with only these two tracks, to be run for passengers and freight both, to be operated by more than one management. I think it would take both the tunnel line and Mr. Chapin's line. The Chairman.—I mean for the Western freight to Albany ? Mr. Robinson. —If the increase is as great as it has been-, the time will be short. I mean that when these double tracks and other facilities are added, for a short time they will be able to do the business which presents itself. There are other roads in contemplation ; there is also the Erie road, as well as our Northern. Mr. Bates. —If in your opinion, when this Tunnel is built and if this consolidation is made, whether the advantages which would accrue through that, would be sufficient to cause a line of road represented by Mr. Comstock to be built with- out any state aid? Mr. Robinson. —Yes, sir ; I think there would be more than that road built throughout the State of New York. I think the large amount of business presented will be an encour- ment which will induce them to build more railroads than are built. I might state, however, that we have in the city of Troy the Union Railroad, which is owned by four corpora- tions,—the New York Central, the Western, the Hudson River, and the Rensselaer and Saratoga. They appointed a superintendent, and adopted other measures, but they were utterly unable to control it. Their engineers would run to- gether, and of course they came before the superintendent, and each would make his complaint, and it was difficult to settle the matter. We found it impossible to control their road in this maimer. The result has been that by the vote, wish and request of the Hudson River road, it has been put under the control of the Troy and Boston road, and I am running it now, and every man is under my charge, and the only way we can run it safely is to have by-laws as well as a superintendent, and if a man disobeys one order he comes entirely under the management of the Troy and Boston road, and is treated just as though he were one of our men.
Recommended publications
  • Hoosac Stores 1 & 2 / Hoosac Stores 3
    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATtS DEPARTMENT OF THH INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM 14 FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ | NAME HISTORIC Hoosac Stores 1 & 2; Hoosac Stores 3 AND/OR COMMON same [LOCATION STREETS, NUMBER 25 (3) and 115 (1 & 2) Water Street (Constitution Road) and Railroad Right-of-way between them. _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT L^StOWn $LA VICINITY OF 8th STATE CODE COUNTY CODE MA 02129 025 Suffolk 025 HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^.DISTRICT —PUBLIC —OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _ BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE X.BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS n/a ?LYES: RESTRICTED ;<XGOVERNMENT 1& —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO _ MILITARY X-OTHER: vacant AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) North Atlantic Regional Office (see continuation sheet) STREETS NUMBER 15 State Street CITY. TOWN STATE Boston VICINITY OF MA LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC Registry of Deeds, Suffolk County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Boston, MA I REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE n/a DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE -EXCELLENT «, a ^.DETERIORATED XjJNALTERED X_ORIGINALSITE _GOOD _RUiNS _ALTERED __MOVED DATE_ _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL^ KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Hoosac Stores 1 & 2, 115 Water Street (1895) Hoosac Stores 1 & 2, built in 1895, is a six-story warehouse structure of red brick laid in common bond.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Maine State Rail Plan
    Maine State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTSview Chapter 1 Framework of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.1 Purpose of the State Rail Plan 1.1 1.2 Visions, Goals, Objectives of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.3 1.3 Transportation and Rail Planning in Maine 1.6 . Figure 1-1: MaineDOT Organizational Chart 1.7 . Figure 1-2: Maine’s MPO Areas 1.10 . Figure 1-3: Regional Planning and Development Councils 1.11 1.4 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 1.12 1.5 Review of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning Studies 1.17 1.6 Evaluation Criteria 1.18 Chapter 2 Freight Rail System 2.1 Overview 2.1 . Figure 2-1: North American Class I Rail Connections 2.2 . Figure 2-2: Map of MM&A Abandonment 2.6 . Figure 2-3: State of Maine Owned Rail Status 2.10 2.2 Freight Rail Industry Development 2.10 2.3 Maine’s Freight Railroad Facilities 2.12 2.4 International, National and Regional Context 2.21 . Figure 2-4: Canadian Class I Connections to Maine System 2.21 . Figure 2-5: Northeast U.S. Rail Freight System 2.22 . Figure 2-6: NS, CP, PAS and PAR Corridors 2.23 . Figure 2-7: Railroad Return on Investment and Cost of Capital 2.24 2.5 Freight Rail Issues and System Constraints 2.24 . Figure 2-8: Estimated National Highway System Peak-Period Congestion 2.25 . Figure 2-9: Estimated Rail Freight Service Levels, 2035 2.25 . Figure 2-10: Rail Clearance and Weight Constraints 2.28 .
    [Show full text]
  • [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation And
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/30/2021 and available online at FR-4915-01-P federalregister.gov/d/2021-16328, and on govinfo.gov SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc., et al.—Control and Merger— Pan Am Systems, Inc., Pan Am Railways, Inc., Boston and Maine Corporation, Maine Central Railroad Company, Northern Railroad, Pan Am Southern LLC, Portland Terminal Company, Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Stony Brook Railroad Company, and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. ACTION: Decision No. 4 in STB Finance Docket No. 36472; Notice of Acceptance of Application and Related Filings; Issuance of Procedural Schedule. SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is accepting for consideration the revised application filed on July 1, 2021, by CSX Corporation (CSXC), CSX Transportation Inc. (CSXT), 747 Merger Sub 2, Inc. (747 Merger Sub 2), Pan Am Systems, Inc. (Systems), Pan Am Railways, Inc. (PAR), Boston and Maine Corporation (Boston & Maine), Maine Central Railroad Company (Maine Central), Northern Railroad (Northern), Portland Terminal Company (Portland Terminal), Springfield Terminal Railway Company (Springfield Terminal), Stony Brook Railroad Company (Stony Brook), and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company (V&M) (collectively, Applicants). The application will be referred to as the Revised Application. The Revised Application seeks Board approval under 49 U.S.C. 11321-26 for: CSXC, CSXT, and 747 Merger Sub 2 to control the seven railroads controlled by Systems and PAR, and CSXT to merge six of the seven railroads into CSXT. This proposal is referred to as the Merger Transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Swamp Project Docket No
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Bear Swamp Project Docket No. P-2669-089 Massachusetts Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................. iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 APPLICATION .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF ACTION AND NEED FOR POWER ......................................... 1 1.2.1 Purpose of Action .......................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Need for Power .............................................................................................. 3 1.3 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ................................. 5 1.3.1 Federal Power Act ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hampden Railroad: Built by the Boston & Maine Railroad and the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Between 1910 & 1918
    Boston & Maine Railroad Historical Society Incorporated Miscellaneous Railroad Items File No. 8 Hardware Collection Brother of Locomotive Engineer’s Division 61 Bible, Gavel & Banner B. of L. E. Boston Division 61 Donation by; John A. Goodwin Donation by; Paul T. Kosciolek Past President 1952 - 1955 Veteran New England Railroad Lines Association Medal Donation by; Buddy Winiarz MT. WASHINGTON N.H. COG RAILWAY Old Peppersass small brass token Anniversary Token The New York Air Brake Company 1890-Fifthieth Anniversary-1940 United Transportation Union (UTU) “Commemorative Coin 1/1/1969” UTU is a board-based Transportation Labor Union. In 1968 exploratory talks to Four Brotherhoods. The Brotherhood of Locomotive, Firemen & Enginemen. The Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. The Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen. The Switchmen’s Union of North America. United Transportation Union came into existence Jan 1, 1969. In 1985 the Railroad Yardmasters of America joined. Railroad Playing Cards Railroad playing cards go back to before the turn of the century. Souvenir Pack Cards with 53 Different Views. Assortment of Railroad Book Matches Book matches were produced in abundance and have been a common railroad giveaway over the years. Those dating from the named passenger trains era, picturing famous trains on their covers, both steam and diesel. Donation by; Francis Giacoma Boston & Northern Street Railway Company Boston and Northern Street Railway Company Canvas Bag. Donation by; William Drury Pillow Case Union Pacific Railroad Pillow Cases where made with white cotton and the railroad ‘s ID. Pullman Company Southern Railway (SR) Serves The South Cloth Items: Hand Towels, Bath Towels. All are white cotton.
    [Show full text]
  • Coexisting: Freight Facilities & Communities
    COEXISTING: FREIGHT FACILITIES & COMMUNITIES The Capital District Intermodal and Automotive Terminal Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern April 24, 2013 The Current Norfolk Southern Network o NS operates approximately 21,000 route miles throughout 22 states and the District of Columbia o Engaged in the rail transportation of raw materials, intermediate products, and finished goods o Operates the most extensive intermodal network in the East o Major transporter of coal and industrial products. o NYSE: NSC 2 What is Pan Am Southern? A Joint Venture created by Norfolk Southern & Pan Am Railways to operate and improve the former Guilford rail network west of Ayer, MA. Includes a new Intermodal / Auto Facility in NYS. NS’ Corridor Development Strategy Long-Term Infrastructure Investments 5 Freight Rail Strengths and Opportunities Freight Transportation Mode Share by Distance Traveled The Rail “Sweet Spot”, particularly for intermodal What is Intermodal? The use of multiple modes of transportation for the movement of freight from origin to destination, usually in a sealed container. What is Intermodal Rail Transport? Intermodal Rail Transport Contents and Percentages of Intermodal Shipments with Identified Content Types of Rail Yards Retarders at a hump classification yard Classification Yard Intermodal Yard Norfolk Southern coal unloading facility, known as PIER 6 Intermodal Facility Overview Automotive Facility Overview Capital District Intermodal and Automotive Facility Mechanicville, NY (Albany) • Pad tracks • 2 tracks @ 8,000 ft. • Support tracks • 5,300 ft. • Parking spaces 371 • 70,000 annual lifts • Service Lanes • Chicago, IL • Boston, MA • NYC via Binghamton • Pan Am Southern facility Mechanicville Looking West 2Q 2012 Prior to Automotive Opening Mechanicville Looking East 2Q 2012 Prior to Automotive Opening Key Design Considerations Lighting Detailed Lighting Analysis Performed by Holophane Average Light Range of 2 to 3.5 fc for the IM pad and Auto Lot areas, up to 6 fc at Gate.
    [Show full text]
  • COPY of Contrl1.CT N:). B7 Ll8 ·J *
    )/1,,r, t. \, J,. ~.--l;;- COPY OF CONTRl1.CT N:). B7 ll8 ·J * iu:MORANDUU OF AGREEMENT made in duplicate this 18th day of June 1940, by and between the BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD,hereinafter called the 11Boston & hlaine11, and the HOOSAC TUNNEL AND WILMINGTON ·RAILROAD COMP.A.t'lY, hereinafter called the 11Wilmington11, both railroad corporations duly organized and existing under the laws of the Com• monwealth of Massachusetts, WITNESSETH: That WHEREAS it is desired to make clear the rights and duties of the parties with respect to certa.in tracks used for interchange of carload freight and for turning locomotives at Hoosac Tunnel, Massa• chusetts, NO'.V THEREFORE, in consideration thereof, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: The tracks covered by thi.s agreement are shown upon a plan marked "Boston and Maine Railroad Fitchburg Di vision Main Line TRACKS USED BY Hoosac Tunnel & Wilmington R. R. HOOSAC TUNNEL,llASS. 0, $; Robinson, Asst. Chief £ngineer Scale: 111 - 1001 Oct. 193911, blueprint copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this agreement. The tracks marked 3-C and C-F, partly on land of the Boston & Maine, and track D-E, all on land of the Boston & Maine, are the property of the Wilmington. All other tracks shown on said plan are the property of said 3oston & Maine,Cprovided, however, that upon payment of the sum of $142.31 to the Boston & Haine, the agreed value of the trackage mat0rial in the section of track form• ing tho northwesterly leg of the wye easterly from the insulated joints shown between the letters A and Bon the attached blueprint, said track shall become the property of the Wilmingto~ ( The Boston & Maine hereby gives to the Wilmington the right ', to own, maintain and operate the tracks owned by it on the property -, .! of tho Boston & Moine during the term of this agr eemen t , It further agrees that upon the termination of this agreement the )ilmington may within a reasonable time remove all the rails, ties and other mater• ials in said tracks from the property of S8id Boston & Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Activation Network Plan for the Charlestown Navy Yard
    Waterfront Activation Network Plan for the Charlestown Navy Yard City of Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino Boston Redevelopment Authority Paul L. McCann, Acting Director 2007 Charlestown Navy Yard Waterfront Activation Network Plan Waterfront Activation Network Plan for the Charlestown Navy Yard City of Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino Boston Redevelopment Authority Paul L. McCann, Acting Director Project Team: Boston Redevelopment Authority Richard McGuinness, Deputy Director of Waterfront Planning Carlos Montanez, Senior Planner Community Partners Consultants, Inc. (team leader, background planning, urban design and story loop concept) John Roll & Associates, Inc. (signage and wayfinding concepts) Ross Miller Studio (public art) Community Partners Consultants, Inc. Acknowledgments Many people who have contributed their ideas, perspectives, and commitment to sound waterfront planning for the Charlestown Navy Yard in Boston. We would particularly like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations who took time to participate in our numerous meetings, discussions, and inquiries on behalf of this project: Organizations Individuals Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) Landmarks Commission Tom Cuhna Bunker Hill Community College Michael Parker Richard McGuinness, Deputy Director for Charlestown Neighborhood Council Ivey St. John Waterfront Planning Courageous Sailing Peter Borre Carlos Montanez, Senior Planner Fort Point Associates, Inc. Vivien Li James Alberque, GIS Specialist Freedom Trail Foundation Terry Savage Friends of the Charlestown
    [Show full text]
  • The Patriot Corridor Double-Stack Clearance Initiative Project Fall
    The Patriot Corridor Double-Stack Clearance Initiative Project Winter 2021 GETTING STARTED ABOUT THE PROJECT The Project team began by The Patriot Corridor Double-Stack Clearance Initiative Project collecting data. A 360° laser (the “Project”) is looking at the potential for operating scan of the entire 155-mile double-stacked “domestic” railroad containers along the existing corridor identified obstructions 155 mile long freight railroad corridor known as the PAS Freight that do not meet the 21-foot Main Line (FML). Most of this corridor is owned and operated by vertical clearance for Pan Am Southern Railroad (PAS). The Massachusetts Bay double-stacked containers. The Transportation Authority (MBTA) owns a 15-mile section of the work also included aerial corridor between Fitchburg Station and Ayer, which carries its surveys, inspecting each commuter rail service on the Fitchburg Line. PAS maintains location, and testing for shallow exclusive freight rights on the MBTA Fitchburg Line. bedrock conditions. The study identified 21 bridges and 2 tunnels on the corridor that The Project team identified key are too low for trains to carry double-stacked containers. The issues and developed Project would raise the height of bridges and tunnels or lower the recommendations for making railroad tracks so these freight trains can use the line. MassDOT clearance improvements at and PAS received funding from the Federal Railroad Administration each location. The team (FRA) to collect data, develop a preliminary design, and prepare and evaluated conditions at each file environmental documents. At this time, funding is not identified site and identified for final design and construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Oo~Gressional Record- House
    '6144 OO~GRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE. JULY 17, study, the leading cla ses are opposed t.o what is c!l'lled t~e protective A bill (S. No. 1942) granting condemned cannon to Abe Lincoln school of politic . They honestly believe as agncnltunsts that free Post No. 29 of the Grand Army of the Republic, at Council Bluits, trade will be better for them. I do not think so, and if my friend Iowa, for monumental purposes. from Indiana expects to carry out the Coleman letter of General A bill (S. No. 2050) donating four condemned cast-iron cannon J" ackson-and General. Jackson undoubtedly was a protectionist in and four cast-iron cannon-balls for the soldiers' monument at hon­ a. moderate way-if he expects the Democratic party to carry out ton, Ohio; and those ideas he will be mistaken. He will have to fall back after all A bill (S. No. 2057) gmnting condemned cannon, &c., to the city upon that party which believes that it is best for the farmer, best of Marshalltown, Iowa. for the cotton-grower, best for all classes of citizens that our indus­ HOUSE BILLS REFERRED. tries shall be diversified, by wise protective1aws; that wherever a The bill (H. R. No. 1858) to provide additional industrial train­ trade, an occupation, a manufacture can with a reasonable prospect ing schools for Indian youth and authorizin" the use of unoccupied be built up with theaidof omeassistancefrom the tarifflaws, that military barracks for such purpose was read twice by' its title, :mel assistance should promptly be given.
    [Show full text]
  • 302918-CP-Comments
    REDACTED PUBLIC RECORD VERSION CP-2 BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD Finance Docket No. 36472 CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. – CONTROL AND MERGER – PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY 302918 CANADIAN PACIFIC’S COMMENTS ENTERED Office of Proceedings August 27, 2021 Part of Public Record David L. Meyer LAW OFFICE OF DAVID L. MEYER 1105 S Street NW Washington, D.C. 20009 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (202) 294-1399 Jeffrey J. Ellis CANADIAN PACIFIC 7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E. Calgary, AB T2C 4X9 Canada Email: [email protected] Telephone: (888) 333-6370 Attorneys for Canadian Pacific August 27, 2021 i REDACTED PUBLIC RECORD VERSION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 2 I. TRANSACTION RAISES MATERIAL CONCERNS ABOUT THE LONG-RUN PRESERVATION OF COMPETITIVE RAIL ACCESS TO NEW ENGLAND FROM THE WEST ................................................................................................................................... 6 A. The PAS Hoosac Tunnel Route Is the Only Viable Competitive Alternative to CSX for Most New England Rail Traffic ........................................ 7 B. The Transaction Will Have Significant Long-Term Implications
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm39986874-1878-SB-0250.Pdf
    SENATE .... No. 350 (ftommomueoltt) of illassacljusdts. In Senate May 10, 1878. The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was committed the Bill relative to the Southern-Yermont Railroad, and cer- Yermont, to be constructed, to connect with the Troy and Greenfield Railroad, have considered the same, and submit thereon the following REPORT. The Southern-Yerraont Rai road Company was chartered n 1848 by the Legislator Vermont. It was authorized construct and maint Iroad across the State, in the ounty of Bennington, from tl Massachusetts to the New- York line. Its railroad t under the charter thus granted. In 1856, Nov. 21, t ,d, then in process of build- ng apparently, was leased by the company to the Troy and Boston Railroad Cf ing the term of the continuance of the chart id Southern-V Railroad Corpoi ing the term of an newal or renewals of said cl irter that might thereafter obtained, at ar an Act of the L rf this Coranu hap- ter 202 of the Statutes of 18( “ The Troy Greenfie Railroad C th 1 to pur- chase the entire road, franchise, stock, bonds, and otlu 9 SOUTHERN-YERMONT RAILROAD. [May, property of the Southern-Yermont Railroad Company, to- gether with the income, benefits, and reversion of its lease to the Troy and Boston Railroad Company, and subject to its provisions, for the sum of two hundred thousand dollars; and for the purpose of enabling them to make such purchase, and transfer the same to the Commonwealth as additional security to the Commonwealth for its whole loan,” a further loan of two hundred thousand dollars to the Troy and Greenfield Railroad Company was authorized, and subsequently made.
    [Show full text]