DOCSLIB.ORG

Court Scientists the Art of Experimentation in the Galilean Accademia Del Cimento (1657–1667)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Court Scientists the Art of Experimentation in the Galilean Accademia Del Cimento (1657–1667) Court Scientists The Art of Experimentation in the Galilean Accademia del Cimento (1657-1667) © 2001-2002 Institute and Museum of the History of Science - Florence. All rights reserved. INDEX 1. THE HISTORY................................................................................................... 5 1.1. THE ORIGINS ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. THE ACCADEMIA AND MEDICI PATRONAGE................................................................. 6 1.3. THE ACCADEMIA’S SETTINGS ........................................................................................... 6 1.4. OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACADEMIES ...................................................................................... 8 1.5. CHRONOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 10 2. THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD............................................. 11 2.1. CRITICISING ARISTOTLE.................................................................................................. 11 2.2. MATHEMATICAL REASON ............................................................................................... 12 2.3. THE RECOURSE TO EXPERIMENT.................................................................................. 13 2.4. TESTING AND RETESTING .............................................................................................. 13 3. THE PROTAGONISTS ............................................................................. 14 3.1. THE PRINCES .................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1. Ferdinando II de’Medici ........................................................................................................ 14 3.1.2. Leopoldo de’Medici ............................................................................................................... 15 3.2. THE SECRETARIES ............................................................................................................ 15 3.2.1. Alessandro Segni .................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.2. Lorenzo Magalotti................................................................................................................ 16 3.3. THE RESIDENT MEMBERS............................................................................................... 16 3.3.1. Giovanni Alfonso Borelli ...................................................................................................... 16 3.3.2. Carlo Roberto Dati .............................................................................................................. 17 3.3.3. Candido del Buono ............................................................................................................... 18 3.3.4. Paolo del Buono.................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.5. Alessandro Marsili............................................................................................................... 18 3.3.6. Antonio Oliva...................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.7. Francesco Redi...................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.8. Carlo Renaldini.................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.9. Vincenzo Viviani................................................................................................................. 21 3.4. MEMBERS BY CORRESPONDENCE .................................................................................. 22 3.4.1. Gian Domenico Cassini........................................................................................................ 22 3.4.2. Honoré Fabri ....................................................................................................................... 22 3.4.3. Robert Hooke....................................................................................................................... 22 2 © 2001-2002 Institute and Museum of the History of Science - Florence 3.4.4. Christiaan Huygens.............................................................................................................. 23 3.4.5. Athanasius Kircher............................................................................................................... 23 3.4.6. Henry Oldenburg.................................................................................................................. 24 3.4.7. Michelangelo Ricci................................................................................................................. 24 3.4.8. Nicolas Steno ....................................................................................................................... 25 4. THE QUESTION OF THE VACUUM ...................................... 25 4.1. THE VACUUM IN GREEK THOUGHT ............................................................................. 25 4.2. ABHORRENCE OF THE VOID........................................................................................... 26 4.3. TORRICELLI’S EXPERIMENT ............................................................................................ 27 4.4. THE ACADEMICIANS AND THE VOID ............................................................................ 27 5. SCIENCE AND ART.................................................................................... 28 5.1. THE CIMENTO’S INSTRUMENTS...................................................................................... 28 5.2. GLASS: BETWEEN ORNAMENT AND ART ..................................................................... 29 5.3. THE CIMENTO’S ARTISTS................................................................................................. 29 6. NATURALIST STUDIES......................................................................... 30 6.1. THE GENERAL PICTURE.................................................................................................. 30 6.2. STUDIES IN THE DIARY.................................................................................................... 31 6.3. STUDIES IN THE CORRESPONDENCE............................................................................. 31 6.4. AN EXTRAORDINARY DECADE...................................................................................... 32 7. METEOROLOGY ........................................................................................... 34 7.1. THE ACCADEMIA’S METEOROLOGY.............................................................................. 34 7.2. THE MEDICEAN METEOROLOGICAL NETWORK......................................................... 35 7.3. THE METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATORY...................................................................... 36 8. ASTRONOMY..................................................................................................... 39 8.1. TESTING THE STARS......................................................................................................... 39 8.2. THE COMPARISON OF TELESCOPES............................................................................... 40 8.3. THE STRANGE APPEARANCES OF SATURN ................................................................... 41 8.4. THE FIRST FIFTY YEARS OF TELESCOPES..................................................................... 42 9. THE EXPERIMENTS................................................................................ 43 3 © 2001-2002 Institute and Museum of the History of Science - Florence 9.1. PNEUMATICS ..................................................................................................................... 43 9.1.1. Barometric Experiment......................................................................................................... 43 9.1.2. Pascal’s Experiment ............................................................................................................. 45 9.1.3. The Magdeburg Hemispheres ................................................................................................ 46 9.1.4. The Bladder in the Void....................................................................................................... 47 9.1.5. The Smoke In the Void........................................................................................................ 48 9.1.6. The Sound in the Void......................................................................................................... 49 9.1.7. The Void In the Void.......................................................................................................... 50 9.2. METEOROLOGY................................................................................................................ 51 9.2.1. Thermometric Scales.............................................................................................................. 51 9.2.2. Comparing Thermometers...................................................................................................... 52 9.2.3. The Condensation Hygrometer ..............................................................................................54 9.3. LIQUIDS .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PERSPECTIVE Steno, Targioni and the Two Forerunners
    dominici:ARGENTI 11/01/2010 11:40 Pagina 101 Journal of Mediterranean Earth Sciences 1 (2009), 101-110 doi:10.3304/JMES.2009.011 Journal of Mediterranean Earth Sciences JME S PERSPECTIVE Steno, Targioni and the two forerunners Stefano Dominici* Museo di Storia Naturale, Sezione di Geologia e Paleontologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze Via La Pira, 4 - 50121 Firenze, Italy ABSTRACT - The brief and enigmatic Forerunner written by Nicholas Steno after a two-year residence in Tuscany (1667- 1668) contains several basic intuitions of earth sciences. His work influenced contemporary natural philosophers through Europe, but was seemingly forgotten in the course of the next century. Only in Florence the naturalist and polymath Giovanni Targioni Tozzetti undertook a geological study of Tuscany and tested the validity of Steno’s hypothesis on the origin of mountains and hills. In relevant passages of his Travels (1751-1754), Targioni expressed a substantial agreement with Steno’s reconstruction, therefore planning a modernized version of Steno’s theory of the earth, which he published in his own Forerunner (1754). In this work he sets the agenda for the new disciplines of physical chorography and topography, wishing to complete their application to Tuscany in his own lifetime, so that Tuscany could be presented as a template of the earth. His fame as author of Travels and owner of one of the best natural history museums of Europe reached many savants who visited him and learned the results of his fieldwork and his geotheory. Some of the people who met with Targioni have influenced the development of geology, and important aspects of his ideas can be found in their writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Orazio Costa Regista. Dalla Compagnia Dell’Accademia Al Piccolo Di Roma (1939- 1954)
    Orazio Costa regista. Dalla Compagnia dell’Accademia al Piccolo di Roma (1939- 1954). Fonti e documenti dal suo archivio Dipartimento di Storia Antropologia Religioni Arte Spettacolo Dottorato di Ricerca in Musica e Spettacolo XXXII ciclo – Studi di Teatro Massimo Giardino Tutor Co-tutor Roberto Ciancarelli Stefano Geraci Orazio Costa regista. Dalla Compagnia dell’Accademia al Piccolo di Roma (1939- 1954). Fonti e documenti dal suo archivio Dipartimento di Storia Antropologia Religioni Arte Spettacolo Dottorato di Ricerca in Musica e Spettacolo XXXII ciclo – Studi di Teatro Massimo Giardino Matricola 1740690 Tutor Co-tutor Roberto Ciancarelli Stefano Geraci A.A. 2018-2019 INDICE PRESENTAZIONE 4 RICOGNIZIONE DEGLI STUDI E DELLE RICERCHE SU ORAZIO COSTA 10 CAPITOLO PRIMO. UN REGISTA PRIMA DELLA REGIA 1.1. Un’“innata” vocazione teatrale 12 1.2. La Scuola di Recitazione “Eleonora Duse” 15 1.3. L’educazione per un teatro possibile 21 1.4. Tra una scuola e l’altra 32 CAPITOLO SECONDO. LE PRIME REGIE COSTIANE 2.1. L’Accademia d’Arte Drammatica 36 2.2. Le assistenze alla regia 40 2.3. L’apprendistato con Copeau 47 2.4. La Compagnia dell’Accademia 54 CAPITOLO TERZO. REGISTA DI COMPAGNIA 3.1. La prima regia senza D’Amico 70 3.2. La seconda Compagnia dell’Accademia 73 3.3. Le regie ibseniane 77 3.4. I semi del metodo mimico 81 3.5. La collaborazione con la Compagnia Pagnani-Ninchi 84 3.6. Le ultime collaborazioni come regista di compagnia 85 CAPITOLO QUARTO. LA COMPAGNIA DEL TEATRO QUIRINO 4.1. La formazione della Compagnia 93 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Blessed Nicholas Steno
    BLESSEDThe Scientist NICHOLAS and STENO (IN DANISH, NIELS STEENSEN) 1638-1686 After a youth spent in studying and then in scientific research, Nicolas Steno at age St. Nicholas of Flue, better known as “Brother Klaus,” was declared patron saint of Switzerland by Pope Pius XII in 1947. He was born 28 converted to the Catholic of a farmer's family in 1417 in Flueli, in the Alpine foothills above Sachseln, in the region of Obwald. He married, had ten children, Church while watching the Portrait of Blessed and conducted a normal life until he was 50. Then he felt a very Nicholas Steno strong call from God to leave everything and follow Him. He therefore asked for three graces: to obtain the consent of his wife Corpus Christi procession, Dorothy and their older children; to never feel the temptation to turn back, and finally, God willing, to be able to live without drinking or eating. All his requests were granted. He lived for twenty years in the thus realizing the greatness forest as a hermit with no food except for the Eucharist, as many witnesses testified. and magnificence of the Eucharist; the Real Presence of Jesus in the Host. He then decided to become a priest and missionary in his own country. In Belgium, at Bois-d’Haine, the Servant of God Anne-Louise Lateau lived for twelve years without eating or drinking, and without sleeping, starting on March 26, 1871. On January 11, 1868, she received stigmata at her feet, hands, head, the left side of her chest and at her right shoulder.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Microscopio Di Galileo Antologia
    Il microscopio di Galileo Antologia Qui di seguito sono stati raccolti alcuni brani antologici relativi al microscopio di Galileo e alla microscopia del Seicento a cura dell’ Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze. 1 Indice John Wedderburn: una preziosa testimonianza sul microscopio di Galileo (1610).............................3 Galileo Galilei: "un Telescopio accomodato per veder gli oggetti vicinissimi" (1623) ......................4 Giovanni Faber: Galileo "è un altro Creatore" (1624).........................................................................5 Galileo Galilei: descrizione del microscopio (1624) ...........................................................................6 Giovanni Faber: il nome “microscopio” (1625) ..................................................................................7 Vincenzo Viviani: Galileo inventore del microscopio (1654).............................................................8 Accademia del Cimento: un’osservazione al microscopio (1657).......................................................9 Carlo Antonio Manzini, le conquiste del microscopio (1661)...........................................................10 Robert Hooke: un ampliamento del dominio dei sensi (1665) ..........................................................11 Anonimo: "Modo di adoperare il microscopio" (1665-1667)............................................................13 Lorenzo Magalotti: la digestione d’alcuni animali (1667).................................................................14 Francesco
    [Show full text]
  • Tema Del Día
    TEMA DEL DÍA LAS RAÍCES DE LA GEOLOGÍA. NICOLAS STENO, LOS ESTRATOS Y EL DILUVIO UNIVERSAL The roots of the Geology. Nicolaus Steno, the strata and the Deluge Leandro Sequeiros * RESUMEN El De Solido intra solido naturaliter contento dissertatinis prodromus, uno de los libros más importan- tes para los inicios de la geología, fue publicado en Florencia en 1669. Su autor, Niels Steensen (también conocido por su nombre latinizado de Nicolaus Steno), fue un anatomista y naturalista danés nacido en Copenhague (Dinamarca) el 11 de enero de 1638. Estudió primero medicina en su ciudad y anatomía en Holanda y París. En 1660, visitó Roma y en 1666 se había establecido en Florencia donde fue acogido por el Gran Duque de Toscana Fernando II. En Florencia, estudiando los dientes puntiagudos que formaban diversas coronas en las mandíbulas de los tiburones, se sorprendió por su gran número, y sus semejanzas con las llamadas Glossopetrae, ob- jetos de piedra traídos de Malta. Steno pensó que ellos pertenecían a partes anatómicas de animales que habían vivido en otro tiempo, y que habían podido transformarse con facilidad mediante procesos quími- cos que no habían afectado a la forma. Los resultados llevaron a Steno a extender sus hipótesis a amplios estudios sobre las conchas de los moluscos antiguos, de los que describe su estructura y su origen orgáni- co, llegando a conclusiones muy cercanas a las aceptadas hoy día. ABSTRACT The De Solido intra solido naturaliter contento dissertationis prodromus, one of the most important bo- ok in the beginning of geology, was published at Florence in 1669.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionoftherm00boltrich.Pdf
    Evolution of the Thermometer Dalence's Thermometer 1688. Evolution of the Thermometer^ 3> BY HENRY CARRINGTON BOLTON Author of Scientific Correspondence of Joseph Priestley EASTON, PA.: THE CHEMICAL PUBLISHING Co. 1900. COPYRIGHT, 1900, BY EDWARD HART. CONTENTS. I. The Open Air-thermometer of Galileo, . 5 II.. Thermoscopes of the Accademia del Cimento, 25 III. Attempts to obtain a scale from Boyle to Newton, 41 IV. Fahrenheit and the first reliable Thermom- eters 61 V. Thermometers of Reaumur, Celsius, and others 79 Table of Thirty-five Thermometer Scales,. 88 Chronological Epitome, 90 Authorities, 92 Index, 97 91629 EVOLUTION OF THE THERMOMETER I. THE OPEN AIR-THERMOMETER OF GALILEO. Discoveries and inventions are sometimes the product of the genius or of the intelligent in- dustry of a single person and leave his hand in a perfect state, as was the case with the ba- rometer invented by Torricelli, but more often the seed of the invention is planted by one, cultivated by others, and the fruit is gathered only after slow growth by some one who ig- nores the original sower. In studying the ori- gin and tracing the history of certain discov- eries of scientific and practical value one is often perplexed by encountering several claim- ants for priority, this is partly due to the cir- " cumstance that coincidence of independent thought is often the cause of two or more per- " sons reaching the same result about the same time and to the effort of each nation ; partly to secure for its own people credit and renown. Again, the origin of a prime invention is some- i 6 EVOLUTION OF THE THERMOMETER, times obscured by the failure of the discoverer to claim definitely the product of his inspira- tion owing to the fact that he himself failed to appreciate its high importance and its utility.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenology of Galileo's Experiments with Pendulums
    BJHS, Page 1 of 35. f British Society for the History of Science 2009 doi:10.1017/S0007087409990033 A phenomenology of Galileo’s experiments with pendulums PAOLO PALMIERI* Abstract. The paper reports new findings about Galileo’s experiments with pendulums and discusses their significance in the context of Galileo’s writings. The methodology is based on a phenomenological approach to Galileo’s experiments, supported by computer modelling and close analysis of extant textual evidence. This methodology has allowed the author to shed light on some puzzles that Galileo’s experiments have created for scholars. The pendulum was crucial throughout Galileo’s career. Its properties, with which he was fascinated from very early in his career, especially concern time. A 1602 letter is the earliest surviving document in which Galileo discusses the hypothesis of pendulum isochronism.1 In this letter Galileo claims that all pendulums are isochronous, and that he has long been trying to demonstrate isochronism mechanically, but that so far he has been unable to succeed. From 1602 onwards Galileo referred to pendulum isochronism as an admirable property but failed to demonstrate it. The pendulum is the most open-ended of Galileo’s artefacts. After working on my reconstructed pendulums for some time, I became convinced that the pendulum had the potential to allow Galileo to break new ground. But I also realized that its elusive nature sometimes threatened to undermine the progress Galileo was making on other fronts. It is this ambivalent nature that, I thought, might prove invaluable in trying to understand crucial aspects of Galileo’s innovative methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrarch and Boccaccio Mimesis
    Petrarch and Boccaccio Mimesis Romanische Literaturen der Welt Herausgegeben von Ottmar Ette Band 61 Petrarch and Boccaccio The Unity of Knowledge in the Pre-modern World Edited by Igor Candido An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. The Open Access book is available at www.degruyter.com. ISBN 978-3-11-042514-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-041930-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-041958-0 ISSN 0178-7489 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Igor Candido, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Typesetting: Konvertus, Haarlem Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Dedicated to Ronald Witt (1932–2017) Contents Acknowledgments IX Igor Candido Introduction 1 H. Wayne Storey The
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Kochanowski University Press
    Jan Kochanowski University Press This is a contribution from Token: A Journal of English Linguistics Volume 8/2019. Edited by John G. Newman, Marina Dossena and Sylwester Łodej. Special Editors for volume 8: Giovanni Iamartino and Irma Taavitsainen. © 2019 Jan Kochanowski University Press. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 8, 2019 Italy and the Royal Society: Medical papers in the early Philosophical Transactions Lucia Berti University of Milan ABSTRACT During the first years of the Royal Society’s existence, a whole network of natural philosophical exchanges was set up between the Fellows and foreign gentlemen interested in the study of nature. From the exchanges with Italy, medicine appears to be one of the major topics of interest; and a series of medical papers based on Italian researches appear in the Society’s journal, the Philosophical Transactions (PT). This article is a linguistic and socio-historical analysis of 25 medical papers published in the PT in the first fifty years of its existence. The selected articles were either translations of Italian writings or reports of Italian research. The purpose of the study is: (1) to illustrate from a linguistic and socio-cultural point of view the nature of Italian medical contributions to the early PT; and (2) to investigate Anglo-Italian relations through the Royal Society’s medical interaction with Italians by analysing the PT articles and further contextual resources from a critical perspective. Keywords: Anglo-Italian relations, medical writing, Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society, seventeenth century. And your own intelligence will spur you on, without the urging of others, to inform yourself about these matters; in the same way you will be led, without doubt, to encourage all the keen minds of Italy to employ their talents in advancing the sciences and the arts by observations and experiments faithfully and diligently performed.
    [Show full text]
  • RM Calendar 2017
    Rudi Mathematici x3 – 6’135x2 + 12’545’291 x – 8’550’637’845 = 0 www.rudimathematici.com 1 S (1803) Guglielmo Libri Carucci dalla Sommaja RM132 (1878) Agner Krarup Erlang Rudi Mathematici (1894) Satyendranath Bose RM168 (1912) Boris Gnedenko 1 2 M (1822) Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausius (1905) Lev Genrichovich Shnirelman (1938) Anatoly Samoilenko 3 T (1917) Yuri Alexeievich Mitropolsky January 4 W (1643) Isaac Newton RM071 5 T (1723) Nicole-Reine Etable de Labrière Lepaute (1838) Marie Ennemond Camille Jordan Putnam 2002, A1 (1871) Federigo Enriques RM084 Let k be a fixed positive integer. The n-th derivative of (1871) Gino Fano k k n+1 1/( x −1) has the form P n(x)/(x −1) where P n(x) is a 6 F (1807) Jozeph Mitza Petzval polynomial. Find P n(1). (1841) Rudolf Sturm 7 S (1871) Felix Edouard Justin Emile Borel A college football coach walked into the locker room (1907) Raymond Edward Alan Christopher Paley before a big game, looked at his star quarterback, and 8 S (1888) Richard Courant RM156 said, “You’re academically ineligible because you failed (1924) Paul Moritz Cohn your math mid-term. But we really need you today. I (1942) Stephen William Hawking talked to your math professor, and he said that if you 2 9 M (1864) Vladimir Adreievich Steklov can answer just one question correctly, then you can (1915) Mollie Orshansky play today. So, pay attention. I really need you to 10 T (1875) Issai Schur concentrate on the question I’m about to ask you.” (1905) Ruth Moufang “Okay, coach,” the player agreed.
    [Show full text]
  • Berti, Torricelli E a Medida Da Pressão Atmosférica
    SEARA DA CIÊNCIA CURIOSIDADES DA FÍSICA José Maria Bassalo Berti, Torricelli e a Medida da Pressão Atmosférica. As bombas aspirantes já eram conhecidas pelas civilizações antigas e, com elas, conseguiam elevar uma coluna de água até determinada altura [no Século 17 observou-se que essa altura era em torno de dez (10) metros, conforme veremos mais adiante]. O apotegma Aristotélico, qual seja: A Natureza tem horror ao vácuo, era empregado pelos filósofos da Antiguidade para explicar a elevação da água. Diziam que, como não poderia haver vácuo entre o êmbulo da bomba e a coluna de água, esta seguia sempre o êmbulo. Porém, eles não sabiam explicar a razão pela qual a água não podia subir até qualquer altura. Sobre essa dificuldade da elevação de uma coluna de água acima de qualquer altura, existe o seguinte fato. Por volta de 1630, um jardineiro construiu uma bomba aspirante para os jardins do Grão-Duque Ferdinando II de Toscana (1610- 1670), em Florença, Itália, bomba essa que se destinava a elevar uma coluna de água acima de dez (10) metros. No entanto, por mais que o jardineiro se esforçasse no sentido de elevar a água acima da altura desejada não o conseguia, pois quando a coluna de água atingia a altura de 18 braças, isto é, cerca de 10,33 metros, ela deixava de seguir o êmbulo, formando, assim, o vácuo tão indesejado pelos aristotélicos. Quando o Grão-Duque dirigiu-se ao físico, matemático e astrônomo italiano Galileu Galilei (1564-1642) no sentido de ele resolver essa delicada questão, o grande sábio italiano apenas respondeu que isso acontecia porque a “Natureza tinha horror ao vácuo”, mas só até um certo limite.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Paola Malanotte Rizzoli Place of Birth: Lonigo (Vicenza), Italy Home Address: 75 Cambridge Parkway, #W502 Cambridge, MA 02142 Work Address: Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room 54-1416 . Cambridge, MA 02139 EDUCATION 1978 Ph.D., Physical Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, Dissertation: “Solitary Rossby Waves Over Variable Relief and Their Stability Properties” 1968 Ph.D., Physics, University of Padua, Italy, “summa cum laude” Dissertation: “Quantum-mechanical structure of biologically important molecules. Investigation of the complex molecules of nucleic acids” 1963 B.S., Physics and Mathematics, Lyceum “Benedetti,” Venice, Italy; with highest honors EMPLOYMENT 1997 - 2009 MIT Director of the Joint Program in Oceanography and Ocean Engineering between M.I.T. and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) 1992- Professor of Physical Oceanography, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1987-1992 Associate Professor of Physical Oceanography with tenure, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1985-1987 Associate Professor of Oceanography, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1981-1985 Assistant Professor of Oceanography, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1978-1980 Cecil and Ida Green Scholar at the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California at San Diego (when on leave of absence from Italy) 2 1976-1981 Senior Scientist (tenured) at the “Istituto Dinamica Grande Masse,” CNR, Venice, Italy 1972-1976
    [Show full text]