Role of Seabed Mapping Techniques in Environmental Monitoring and Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Science Series Technical Report no.127 The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers Science Series Technical Report no.127 The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers April 2006 Funded by This report should be cited as: S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers, 2006. The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management. Sci. Ser. Tech Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 127: 170pp. Authors responsible for writing sections of this report are as follows: Chapter 1 - S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough and P.E. Eastwood Chapter 2 - S.E. Boyd Chapter 3 - D.S. Limpenny, S.E. Boyd, S.N.R. Birchenough, W.J. Meadows and K. Vanstaen Chapter 4 - Part 1: R.A. Coggan and S. Philpott: Part 2: P.Eastwood. Chapter 5 - S.N.R.Birchenough, R.Foster-Smith, S.E. Boyd, W.J. Meadows, K. Vanstaen and D.S. Limpenny Chapter 6 - R.A. Coggan Chapter 7 - P.E. Eastwood, S. Souissi, S. Rogers and R.A. Coggan Chapter 8 - R.L. Foster-Smith Chapter 9 - S.E. Boyd, R.L. Foster-Smith, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny and P.E. Eastwood Chapter 10 - S.E. Boyd, R.A, Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough and P.E. Eastwood Chapter 11 - R.A. Coggan, R.L. Foster-Smith, K. Vanstaen and S.N.R.Birchenough. This publication is also available at http://www2.defra.gov.uk/ research/project_data/Default.asp © Crown copyright, 2006 This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. This publication is also available at www.cefas.co.uk For any other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.hmso.gov.uk/copyright/licences/core/core_ licence.htm, or by writing to: HMSO’s Licensing Division St Clements House 2-16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 E-mail: [email protected] Contents 4.6 Scope for linkage between surveys 1. Executive Summary 5 conducted at different spatial scales 43 4.6.1 Introduction 43 4.6.2 Materials and methods 44 2. Introduction 8 4.6.3 Results 46 4.6.4 Discussion 46 2.1 Objectives 10 5. Utility of mapping techniques for 3. Development and evaluation of survey assessing/monitoring temporal techniques 11 changes 50 3.1. Selection of sampling methodologies and 5.1 Introduction 50 survey sites 11 5.2 Site descriptions 50 3.2 Methods - Acoustic surveys 12 5.2.1 Dredged material disposal site (TY070) 50 3.2.1 Digital sidescan sonar 12 5.2.2 Aggregate extraction site (Shoreham) 51 3.2.2 Multibeam bathymetry 14 5.3 Methods - acoustic surveys 51 3.2.3 Acoustic Ground Discrimination Systems 15 5.3.1 AGDS 51 3.2.4 Data interpretation 15 5.3.2 Sidescan sonar 53 3.3 Methods - biological surveys and ground- 5.3.3 Multibeam bathymetry 53 truthing 15 5.4 Methods - biological surveys and 3.3.1 Grab sampling 16 ground-truthing 54 3.3.2 Beam trawling 16 5.4.1 Data analysis 54 3.3.3 On-deck photography 17 5.4.2 Characterisation of grab samples 54 3.3.4 Underwater video and stills photography 17 5.5 Results (TY070) 55 3.3.5 Sediment Profile Imagery 18 5.5.1 Sidescan sonar 55 3.4 Logging and achiving of field data 19 5.5.2 Multibeam bathymetry 58 3.5 Laboratory sample processing 19 5.5.3 AGDS classification 58 3.5.1 Macrofaunal samples 19 5.5.4 Sediment characteristics 63 3.5.2 Particle size analysis 19 5.5.5 Biological characteristics 64 3.6 Data analysis 19 5.5.6 Characterisation of grab samples 67 5.5.7 Supervised classification of AGDS data 70 5.5.8 Sediment Profile Imagery 74 4. Investigating seabed conditions over 5.5.9 Video information 77 different spatial scales 21 5.6 Results (Shoreham) 79 5.6.1 Sidescan sonar 79 4.1. Introduction 21 5.6.2 Multibeam bathymetry 79 4.2. Background 21 5.6.3 AGDS classification 79 4.3. Methods 22 5.6.4 Sediment characteristics 79 4.3.1 Hastings study area 22 5.6.5 Biological characteristics 83 4.3.2 Broadscale study area 23 5.6.6 Characterisation of grab samples 85 4.4 Results 26 5.6.7 Supervised classification of AGDS 87 4.4.1 Hastings study area 26 5.6.8 Optical techniques 90 4.4.2 Broadscale study area 35 5.7 Discussion 92 4.5 Discussion 41 5.7.1 Utility of individual techniques 92 4.5.1 Hastings study area 41 5.7.2 Utility of an integrated approach 94 4.5.2 Broadscale study area 41 continued/: Contents 6. Implications of biogeographical 9. Conclusions and recommendations 128 variations in community composition for predictive mapping 95 10. Future work 131 6.1 Introduction 95 6.2 Methods 95 6.3 Results 96 11. Approaches to scoping and designing 6.4 Discussion 101 seabed habitat surveys 132 11.1 Introduction 132 11.2 Scoping the survey 132 7. Predictive mapping of marine fauna 11.2.1 Flow chart 132 and seabed communities 104 11.2.2 Consultation 132 11.2.3 Information required of the applicant 133 7.1 Introduction 104 11.2.4 Stakeholders: who are they and what 7.2 Predictive mapping of individual marine information if required of them? 134 fauna 104 11.2.5 Risk analysis 135 7.2.1 Materials and methods 104 11.2.6 Scoping the survey: issues to resolve 135 7.2.2 Results 106 11.2.7 Outputs: survey parameters 136 7.3 Predictive mapping of seabed 11.3 Designing the survey 136 communities 108 11.4 Summary 143 7.3.1 Materials and methods 108 7.3.2 Results 109 7.4 Discussion 111 12. Publications 144 8. Utility of mapping techniques for 13. References 145 assessing/monitoring features of nature conservation interest 113 14. Acknowledgements 152 8.1 Introduction 113 8.2 Techniques 115 8.3 Summary of survey results 115 ANNEXES 153 8.4 Detection 116 8.5 Sampling and variability 122 8.6 Change 124 8.7 Discussion 126 5 1. Executive summary 1 EXECUTIVE SUMM A RY This report details work carried out by the Centre for • The EU Agreement on a Recommendation concerning Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Integrated Coastal Zone Management The British Geological Survey (BGS) and Envision Ltd over • The EU Directives on Habitats and Species and that on the course of a 4-year research programme primarily for the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive. the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs • Integrated assessment of marine ecosystems (e.g. the (Defra). The overall aim of the programme was to evaluate ICES Regional Ecosystem Study Group for the North an array of ‘state of the art’ seabed mapping techniques to Sea (REGNS) initiative, the OSPAR Quality Status establish their suitability for application in areas impacted Reports and the UK state of the seas report ‘Charting by man-made activities. Progress’) There is now a growing momentum for seabed and • UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. resource mapping programmes, driven by several forward- look and horizon-scanning exercises that have recognised The rapid pace of developments in the field of habitat the need for seabed maps to underpin spatial planning mapping, driven by continuous improvements in acoustic and the sustainable use of seabed resources (both mineral techniques (sidescan sonar, multibeam bathymetry, and biological). A major driver for all this activity is the acoustic ground discrimination systems), has the potential Marine Bill that is likely to include key commitments for to radically alter approaches to the assessment of the U.K. Government in terms of implementing marine anthropogenic impacts at the seabed. In addition to spatial planning in coastal and offshore waters. The U.K. their utility in wide-scale reconnaissance surveys (e.g. in Government also has an interest in ensuring that the most a resource or conservation context), a number of site- cost-effective methods of assessment are employed by all specific applications of relevance to Defra and other those responsible for undertaking environmental monitoring Government Departments (e.g. dredged material disposal, activities. Further core drivers for seabed mapping exist aggregate extraction, construction activities, oil and gas at the international level. OSPAR and ICES are both exploitation, fishing impacts) could also benefit from promoting concerted efforts for trans-national cooperation the use of these techniques. A range of ‘state of the in seabed and habitat mapping as it is of particular art’ methodology was therefore evaluated through a relevance to the ecosystem approach to management and programme of rigorous field testing in order to establish critical to any attempt at integrated assessment of marine the most cost-effective strategies to meet both site- ecosystems (e.g.