DOCSLIB.ORG

Tranche 2 Action Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tranche 2 Action Plans For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan visit http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-5155 UK Biodiversity Group Tranche 2 Action Plans Maritime Species and Habitats THE RT HON JOHN PRESCOTT MP THE RT HON PETER MANDELSON MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE NORTHERN IRELAND ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS SARAH BOYACK MSP CHRISTINE GWYTHER AM MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT AND ASSEMBLY SECRETARY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AGRICULTURE, AND THE THE SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE RURAL DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES Dear Deputy Prime Minister, Secretary of State, Minister and Assembly Secretary, BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLANS I am writing to you in my capacity as Chairman of the United Kingdom Biodiversity Group (UKBG) about the latest group of biodiversity action plans which UKBG have completed and published in the present volume. Publication of this fifth volume in the Tranche 2 Action Plan series fulfils the undertaking, given in the Government Response to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group Report 1995, to produce maritime action plans covering further coastal and marine habitats and species. The volume includes reprints of the marine and coastal species and habitat action plans originall y published in the Steering Group’s Report, as well as new action plans for 16 species/groups of species and 17 habitats. The reprinted saline lagoon habitat action plan has an additional annex containin g statements on a further eight species whose conservation needs will be considered as part of that plan. Similarly, there are two species statements attached to the mud in deep habitats plan. The volume also has a technical introduction detailing the methodology and criteria used in determining the priorit y species and habitats. The marine environment poses different challenges for action plan implementation and the introduction highlights some of the issues involved. Among these is the relative lack of scientific evidence to help explain the functioning of marine ecosystems and the requirements of marine species. Many of the plans identify the need for further research as being of paramount importance to their success. Development of this volume was coordinated by the Coastal and Marine Sub-Groups and involve d Government departments and agencies, voluntary conservation groups, industry and academi c institutions. The plans set challenging but achievable targets to conserve and enhance the species and habitats. The new species action plans are accompanied by a table showing their indicative costings, so that those charged with implementation are clear about the scale of the financial consequences. The new habitat action plans include indicative costings. As in earlier volumes, the new species action plans are accompanied by a list of lead partners (often a Non-Governmental Organisation) who will take the lead in their implementation, supported by a contact point (alw ays a Government agency or department). We are pleased that some new voluntar y organisations have agreed to become lead partners for certain of the action plans. The plans in this volume represent a significant step for the UK Biodiversity Action Plan and put marine and coastal species and habitats on a similar footing to the key terrestrial plans.On behalf of the UKBG, I commend them to you and your ministerial colleagues. SOPHIA LAMBERT Contents Page Introduction 1. Background ..............................................................9 2. Review of broad habitat classification and priority habitats and species ................9 3. Issues arising from the maritime action plans ...................................14 4. Priority Species Action Plans ................................................17 Mammals .........................................................19 Reptiles ..........................................................35 Fish ..............................................................41 Molluscs ..........................................................61 Sea anemones ......................................................75 Corals ............................................................83 Algae ............................................................89 5. Priority Habitat Action Plans and associated Species Statements ....................97 Maritime cliff and slopes .............................................99 Coastal sand dunes .................................................105 Machair .........................................................111 Coastal vegetated shingle ............................................117 Littoral and sub-littoral chalk .........................................121 Sabellaria alveolata reefs ...........................................125 Coastal saltmarsh ..................................................129 Mudflats .........................................................135 Sheltered muddy gravels ............................................141 Sabellaria spinulosa reefs ...........................................145 Tidal rapids ......................................................149 Modiolus modiolus beds ............................................153 Seagrass beds .....................................................157 Maerl beds .......................................................161 Saline lagoons (plus annex with eight species statements) ..................165 Mud habitats in deep water (plus annex with two species statements) .........179 Serpulid reefs .....................................................185 Sublittoral sands and gravels .........................................189 Lophelia pertusa reefs ..............................................195 6. Broad Habitat Statements .................................................201 Annexes 1. List of abbreviations and acronyms ..........................................237 2. Species action plan costings ................................................239 3. List of species and habitats, with Contact Points, Lead Partners and Lead Agencies/Departments ....................................................241 1. Background 1.1 Following the preparation of the first tranche of action plans in 1995, it was concluded that a selection of marine and coastal habitats and species action plans needed to be prepared within a redefined broad habitat classification. The work of producing the action plans was co- ordinated by two sub-groups (coastal and marine) of the UK Biodiversity Targets Group. 1.2 The sub-groups were asked to: ! review the broad habitat classification for coastal and marine habitats; ! assess whether the criteria, which had been developed for selecting terrestrial priority habitats and species on land, were appropriate for coastal and marine habitats and species, and recommend any adjustments; ! apply the agreed criteria in order to select priority coastal and marine habitats and species; ! and oversee the preparation of the action plans, including consultation with government departments, agencies and NGOs. 2. Review of broad habitat classification and priority habitats and species Broad habitats 2.1 The original maritime broad habitats (table 1) were largely selected by geomorphological characteristics (eg estuary and open coast) with the result that each contained a range of habitats, some occurring in several physiographic features. In the review of priority habitats (see below) some of the original broad habitats were given priority status. The revised broad habitat classification was developed using a logical and hierarchical structure based closely on the JNCC Marine Nature Conservation Review marine biotopes classification system, and provides an overview of the extent and character of the entire UK maritime environment (table 2). The broad habitat statements for this revised classification are included in this volume. Figure 1 shows a map of the UK Waters1 marked with the underwater features identified within the statements. 1 ‘UK Waters’ are referred to throughout the marine plans. These are internal waters (inside the baselines from which the territorial sea is measured), territorial waters (whose limits extend to 12 nautical miles from these baselines) and waters within 200 nautical miles from the baselines within which the UK exercises certain rights and jurisdictions. The extent of potential UK action under the plans in marine areas beyond territorial waters is, under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, subject to the rights of other states. 9 Figure 1. UK waters, with features identified in the broad habitat statements 10 Table 1. Original broad habitats Habitat Change made Maritime cliff and slope turned into a priority habitat Boulders and rock above high tide mark removed Shingle above high tide mark turned into a priority habitat and renamed coastal vegetated shingle Coastal strandline removed Machair turned into a priority habitat Saltmarsh turned into a priority habitat Sand dune turned into a priority habitat Estuaries removed Islands and archipelagos removed Inlets and enclosed bays removed Open coast removed Shelf break removed Open sea water column removed Offshore seabed removed Priority habitats 2.2 Within each broad habitat, priority habitats were identified that would benefit from conservation effort directed by a specific action plan. In the review of the selection criteria for these habitats, and the way in which they should be interpreted, two additonal categories were identified and adopted: ! habitats for which a high proportion (over 40%) of the north-east
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Oxygen Deficiency (Depletion): Bivalve Assemblages As an Indicator of Ecosystem Instability in the Northern Adriatic Sea
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Response to oxygen deficiency (depletion): Bivalve assemblages as an indicator of ecosystem instability in the northern Adriatic Sea Vedrana NERLOVIĆ1, Alper DOĞAN2 & Mirjana HRS-BRENKO1 1Ruđer Bošković Institute, Centre for Marine Research, Giordano Paliaga 5, HR-52210 Rovinj, Croatia e-mail: vedrana.nerlovic@cim.irb.hr 2 Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey e-mail: alper.dogan@ege.edu.tr Abstract: Benthic communities represent a powerful tool for the detection of natural and anthropogenic disturbances, as well as for the assessment of marine ecosystem stability. This paper shows that Bivalve assemblages could serve as excellent indicators of disturbance and ecosystem instability. The goal of this study was to compare two sets of data in order to determine the differences between two different periods belonging to Bivalve assemblage in the muddy detritic bottom of the northern Adriatic Sea in the post-anoxic period during December 1989, 1990, 1991 and quite a while later, during 2003, 2004 and 2005. Abundances of some indicator species such as Corbula gibba, Modiolarca subpicta, and Timoclea ovata were detected during the post-anoxic period. Recruitment in the quality of Bivalve assemblages was proved by the ecologic and biotic indexes during 2003, 2004 and 2005, during a period of relatively stable ecological conditions. Fluctuation in Bivalve diversity due to the ecological quality of the marine ecosystem in the eastern part of the northern Adriatic Sea is also discussed. Key words: hypoxia; Bivalve assemblages; indicator species; soft bottoms; northern Adriatic Sea Introduction Recent reviews and summaries have provided good introductions on how hypoxia and anoxia came to be such a large and serious problem in the aquatic ecosystem (Gray et al.
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. k.hiscock@mba.ac.uk High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Conservation of Orophilous Moths at the Southern Boundary of Their Range (Lepidoptera: Macroheterocera)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 106: 231–239, 2009 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1447 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) On top of a Mediterranean Massif: Climate change and conservation of orophilous moths at the southern boundary of their range (Lepidoptera: Macroheterocera) STEFANO SCALERCIO CRA Centro di Ricerca per l’Olivicoltura e l’Industria Olearia, Contrada Li Rocchi-Vermicelli, I-87036 Rende, Italy; e-mail: stefano.scalercio@entecra.it Key words. Biogeographic relict, extinction risk, global warming, species richness, sub-alpine prairies Abstract. During the last few decades the tree line has shifted upward on Mediterranean mountains. This has resulted in a decrease in the area of the sub-alpine prairie habitat and an increase in the threat to strictly orophilous moths that occur there. This also occurred on the Pollino Massif due to the increase in temperature and decrease in rainfall in Southern Italy. We found that a number of moths present in the alpine prairie at 2000 m appear to be absent from similar habitats at 1500–1700 m. Some of these species are thought to be at the lower latitude margin of their range. Among them, Pareulype berberata and Entephria flavicinctata are esti- mated to be the most threatened because their populations are isolated and seem to be small in size. The tops of these mountains are inhabited by specialized moth communities, which are strikingly different from those at lower altitudes on the same massif further south. The majority of the species recorded in the sub-alpine prairies studied occur most frequently and abundantly in the core area of the Pollino Massif.
    [Show full text]
  • Alderney West Coast and Burhou Islands Ramsar Site Management Strategy
    Alderney West Coast and Burhou Islands Ramsar Site Management Strategy Version 1 Louise Soanes 1 (Alderney Wildlife Trust) and Helen Booker 2 (RSPB) Date: January 2007 1 Alderney Wildlife Trust, 34 Victoria Street, St Annes, Alderney, GY9 3TA, Channel Islands. 2 The RSPB, SW England Regional Office, Keble House, Southernhay Gardens, Exeter, Devon, EX1 1NT Alderney West Coast and Burhou Islands Ramsar Site Management Strategy Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 1.1 Strategic goals 1.2 Objectives 1.3 Political context of strategy 2 The Alderney west coast and Burhou islands Ramsar site – interest features and their context 2.1 Habitats and flora 2.2 Seabirds 2.2.1 Internationally important species 2.2.2 Nationally important species 2.2.3 Locally important species 2.3 Non-avian fauna 3 An overview of potential factors Ramsar features around Alderney 3.1 Developments and other commercial activities 3.2 Habitat change 3.3 Human disturbance 3.4 Pollution 3.5 Climate change 3.6 Seabird specific factors 3.6.1 Introduced mammalian predators 3.6.2 Native avian predators 3.6.3 Food availability 4 Review of past management and monitoring in and around the Ramsar site 4.1 Marine habitats 4.2 Seabird management 4.2.1 Seabird ringing 4.3 Non-avian species 5 Ramsar site monitoring and management strategy 5.1 Non-avian Ramsar interest features 5.2 Seabirds 5.3 Ramsar Site Management and action plan 6. Education and public relations 7 Costs and resource requirements 8 Project management 2 Alderney West Coast and Burhou Islands Ramsar Site Management Strategy 9 Strategy review 10 Acknowledgments 11 References Figures and Tables Figure 1 : Map of the Alderney Ramsar site Table 1 : Priority seabird populations within the Ramsar site Table 3 : Ramsar monitoring and action plan, Part 1 – Seabirds Table 4: Ramsar monitoring and action plan, Part 2 – Marine habitats and non- avian fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Iconic Bees: 12 Reports on UK Bee Species
    Iconic Bees: 12 reports on UK bee species Bees are vital to the ecology of the UK and provide significant social and economic benefits through crop pollination and maintaining the character of the landscape. Recent years have seen substantial declines in many species of bees within the UK. This report takes a closer look at how 12 ‘iconic’ bee species are faring in each English region, as well as Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Authors Rebecca L. Evans and Simon G. Potts, University of Reading. Photo: © Amelia Collins Contents 1 Summary 2 East England Sea-aster Mining Bee 6 East Midlands Large Garden Bumblebee 10 London Buff-tailed Bumblebee 14 North East Bilberry Bumblebee 18 North West Wall Mason Bee 22 Northern Ireland Northern Colletes 26 Scotland Great Yellow Bumblebee 30 South East England Potter Flower Bee 34 South West England Scabious Bee 38 Wales Large Mason Bee 42 West Midlands Long-horned Bee 46 Yorkshire Tormentil Mining Bee Through collating information on the 12 iconic bee species, common themes have Summary emerged on the causes of decline, and the actions that can be taken to help reverse it. The most pervasive causes of bee species decline are to be found in the way our countryside has changed in the past 60 years. Intensification of grazing regimes, an increase in pesticide use, loss of biodiverse field margins and hedgerows, the trend towards sterile monoculture, insensitive development and the sprawl of towns and cities are the main factors in this. I agree with the need for a comprehensive Bee Action Plan led by the UK Government in order to counteract these causes of decline, as called for by Friends of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Aculeate Conservation Group/ Hymettus Report for 2006
    Aculeate Conservation Group/ Hymettus Report for 2006 1. Background to 2006 Research. 1.1 During 2006 a new body, Hymettus Ltd., was constituted. Hymettus will take over and extend the role of the Aculeate Conservation Group. This report deals with research originally agreed at the 2005 ACG Annual Review and funded by English Nature (now also re-incarnated as Natural England), but executed under Hymettus Ltd.. During 2006 work was financially supported by English Nature, Earthwatch, Syngenta and the RSPB in accordance with the relevant Annex a documents, which see for details. 1.2 2005 Projects are reported in the following order of taxonomic group: ants, wasps, bees, other projects. 2. Ant Projects. 2.1 Formica exsecta 2.1.1 At the 2005 Review meeting Stephen Caroll was asked to enquire of the Devon Trust as to whether they would be prepared to consider looking at the possibility of proposing a landscape project for the Bovey Basin which would include the habitat requirements of Formica exsecta and , if so, whether a contribution from the ACG towards the costs of looking at this would be appropriate. 2.1.2 The Trust received this request enthusiastically and have submitted a copy of Andrew Taylor’s (their Officer) Report. Stephen Caroll will be able to bring us up to date with developments at the Review meting. The Report is presented here (appendices may be obtained from Mike Edwards): Landscape-scale habitat work in Devon’s Bovey Basin Report to Hymettus Limited, October 2006 1. Introduction The Bovey Basin is located in the Teignbridge district of South Devon.
    [Show full text]
  • E Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary
    !e Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary Jessica Reeves & John Buckeridge Published by: Greypath Productions Marine Care Ricketts Point PO Box 7356, Beaumaris 3193 Copyright © 2012 Marine Care Ricketts Point !is work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission of the publisher. Photographs remain copyright of the individual photographers listed. ISBN 978-0-9804483-5-1 Designed and typeset by Anthony Bright Edited by Alison Vaughan Printed by Hawker Brownlow Education Cheltenham, Victoria Cover photo: Rocky reef habitat at Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary, David Reinhard Contents Introduction v Visiting the Sanctuary vii How to use this book viii Warning viii Habitat ix Depth x Distribution x Abundance xi Reference xi A note on nomenclature xii Acknowledgements xii Species descriptions 1 Algal key 116 Marine invertebrate key 116 Glossary 118 Further reading 120 Index 122 iii Figure 1: Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary. !e intertidal zone rocky shore platform dominated by the brown alga Hormosira banksii. Photograph: John Buckeridge. iv Introduction Most Australians live near the sea – it is part of our national psyche. We exercise in it, explore it, relax by it, "sh in it – some even paint it – but most of us simply enjoy its changing modes and its fascinating beauty. Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary comprises 115 hectares of protected marine environment, located o# Beaumaris in Melbourne’s southeast ("gs 1–2). !e sanctuary includes the coastal waters from Table Rock Point to Quiet Corner, from the high tide mark to approximately 400 metres o#shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Int. J. Biosci. 2018
    Int. J. Biosci. 2018 International Journal of Biosciences | IJB | ISSN: 2220-6655 (Print), 2222-5234 (Online) http://www.innspub.net Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 82-89, 2018 RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Describing shell shapes of Venerid bivalves using elliptic fourier analysis Mark Lloyd Dapar, Sharon Rose Tabugo* Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Mathematics Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines Key words: Veneridae, CVA, MANOVA, Variation, Elliptic Fourier Analysis. http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/12.1.82-89 Article published on January 12, 2018 Abstract In this study, Elliptic Fourier (EF) analysis was used to describe phenotypic variation among the selected venerid bivalve species Meretrix lyrata (lyrate asiatic hard clam), Chamelea striatula (striped venus clam) and Tapes dorsatus (turgid venus clam). Thus, to describe possible phenotypic diversity, a total of 90 venerid bivalves (30 specimens for each species) were photographed on their right valves. Canonical variate analysis (CVA), multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests showed significant difference between species based on the Fourier coefficients. This study showed significant variations in the shape of the right external valve of the shell. CVA plot generated show separation of populations examined indicating significant difference between groups. Observed differences in the external shell shapes of different venerid bivalve species were based in the umbo, anterior margin, shell width, length depth and anterior margin depression. Results suggest hypothesized variable factors behind the disparity of the external shell shape which include habitat differences, environment and genotype interactions. Herewith, the use of Elliptic Fourier (EF) analysis proved to be useful in effective quantification of inter-specific variation between species.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Bees
    Scottish Bees Introduction to bees Bees are fascinating insects that can be found in a broad range of habitats from urban gardens to grasslands and wetlands. There are over 270 species of bee in the UK in 6 families - 115 of these have been recorded in Scotland, with 4 species now thought to be extinct and insufficient data available for another 2 species. Bees are very diverse, varying in size, tongue-length and flower preference. In the UK we have 1 species of honey bee, 24 species of bumblebee and the rest are solitary bees. They fulfil an essential ecological and environmental role as one of the most significant groups of pollinating insects, all of which we depend upon for the pollination of 80% of our wild and cultivated plants. Some flowers are in fact designed specifically for bee pollination, to the exclusion of generalist pollinators. Bees and their relatives Bees are classified in the complex insect order Hymenoptera (meaning membrane-winged), which also includes many kinds of parasitic wasps, gall wasps, hunting wasps, ants and sawflies. There are about 150,000 species of Hymenoptera known worldwide separated into two sub-orders. The first is the most primitive sub-order Symphyta which includes the sawflies and their relatives, lacking a wasp-waist and generally with free-living caterpillar-like larvae. The second is the sub-order Apocrita, which includes the ants, bees and wasps which are ’wasp-waisted’ and have grub-like larvae that develop within hosts, galls or nests. The sub-order Apocrita is in turn divided into two sections, the Parasitica and Aculeata.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Seabed Mapping Techniques in Environmental Monitoring and Management
    Science Series Technical Report no.127 The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers Science Series Technical Report no.127 The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers April 2006 Funded by This report should be cited as: S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers, 2006. The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management. Sci. Ser. Tech Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 127: 170pp. Authors responsible for writing sections of this report are as follows: Chapter 1 - S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough and P.E. Eastwood Chapter 2 - S.E. Boyd Chapter 3 - D.S. Limpenny, S.E. Boyd, S.N.R. Birchenough, W.J. Meadows and K. Vanstaen Chapter 4 - Part 1: R.A. Coggan and S. Philpott: Part 2: P.Eastwood. Chapter 5 - S.N.R.Birchenough, R.Foster-Smith, S.E. Boyd, W.J. Meadows, K. Vanstaen and D.S. Limpenny Chapter 6 - R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]