Blødbundsfauna Undersøgelser I Beskyttede Områder I Kattegat (Havstrategi- Områder)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Blødbundsfauna Undersøgelser I Beskyttede Områder I Kattegat (Havstrategi- Områder) Blødbundsfauna Undersøgelser i beskyttede områder i Kattegat (havstrategi- områder) Januar 2017 Redaktion: Styrelsen for Vand- og Naturforvaltning Tekst: Helle Buur Pedersen og Jens Deding Forsidefoto: SVANA Østjylland ISBN: 978-87-7120-848-1 Udgivelse: Januar 2017 2 Styrelsen for Vand- og Naturforvaltning Blødbundsfauna Undersøgelser i beskyttede områder i Kattegat (havstrategi-områder) Indhold 1. Indledning .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Baggrund ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Formål med undersøgelserne ................................................................................................ 6 2. Metodebeskrivelse ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Indsamling af prøver og oparbejdning .................................................................................. 7 2.2 Artsantal, tæthed og biomasse .............................................................................................. 9 2.3 Beskrivelse af faunaindex .................................................................................................... 10 3. Resultater .................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Område A ............................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.1 Beskrivelse af område A ............................................................................................... 14 3.1.2 Sedimentet i område A................................................................................................. 15 3.1.3 Artsantal i område A .................................................................................................... 16 3.1.4 Individtæthed i område A ............................................................................................ 17 3.1.5 Biomasse i område A .................................................................................................... 19 3.1.6 Similaritetsindex for tæthed og biomasse ................................................................... 19 3.1.7 Faunaindex for område A ............................................................................................ 21 3.1.8 Særlige arter der er værd at fremhæve ........................................................................ 21 3.1.9 Fund af fokusarter samt relevante resultater fra kortlægningen af epifauna, bundlevende fisk og jomfruhummere ........................................................................................ 22 3.2 Område B ............................................................................................................................ 23 3.2.1 Områdebeskrivelse B ................................................................................................... 23 3.2.2 Sedimentet i område B ................................................................................................. 24 3.2.3 Artsantal i område B .................................................................................................... 25 3.2.4 Individtæthed i område B ............................................................................................ 26 3.2.5 Biomasse i område B .................................................................................................... 28 3.2.6 Similaritetsindex for tæthed og biomasse ................................................................... 28 3.2.7 Faunaindex for område B ............................................................................................ 31 3.2.8 Særlige arter, der er værd at fremhæve ....................................................................... 31 Styrelsen for Vand- og Naturforvaltning 3 3.2.9 Fund af fokusarter samt relevante resultater fra kortlægningen af epifauna, bundlevende fisk og jomfruhummere ........................................................................................ 32 3.3 Område C............................................................................................................................. 33 3.3.1 Beskrivelse af område C ............................................................................................... 33 3.3.2 Sedimentet i område C ................................................................................................. 34 3.3.3 Artsantal i område C .................................................................................................... 34 3.3.4 Individtæthed i område C ............................................................................................ 35 3.3.5 Biomasse i område C .................................................................................................... 38 3.3.6 Similaritetsindex for tæthed og biomasse ................................................................... 38 3.3.7 Faunaindex for område C ............................................................................................ 41 3.3.8 Særlige arter, der er værd at fremhæve ....................................................................... 41 3.3.9 Fund af fokusarter samt relevante resultater fra kortlægningen af epifauna, bundlevende fisk og jomfruhummere ........................................................................................ 43 3.4 Område D ............................................................................................................................ 44 3.4.1 Beskrivelse af område D .............................................................................................. 44 3.4.2 Sedimentet i område D ................................................................................................ 45 3.4.3 Artsantal i område D .................................................................................................... 45 3.4.4 Individtæthed i område D ............................................................................................ 48 3.4.5 Biomasse i område D ................................................................................................... 49 3.4.6 Similaritetsindex for tæthed og biomasse ................................................................... 49 3.4.7 Faunaindex for område D ............................................................................................ 51 3.4.8 Særlige arter der er værd at fremhæve ........................................................................ 53 3.4.9 Fund af fokusarter samt relevante resultater fra kortlægningen af epifauna, bundlevende fisk og jomfruhummere ........................................................................................ 58 3.5 Område E ............................................................................................................................ 59 3.5.1 Beskrivelse af område E ............................................................................................... 59 3.5.2 Sedimentet i område E ................................................................................................. 60 3.5.3 Artsantal i område E .................................................................................................... 60 3.5.4 Individtæthed i område E ............................................................................................ 61 3.5.5 Biomasse i område E .................................................................................................... 64 3.5.6 Similaritetsindex for tæthed og biomasse ................................................................... 64 3.5.7 Faunaindex for område E ............................................................................................ 66 3.5.8 Særlige arter der er værd at fremhæve ........................................................................ 66 3.5.9 Fund af fokusarter samt relevante resultater fra kortlægningen af epifauna, bundlevende fisk og jomfruhummere ........................................................................................ 68 3.6 Område F ............................................................................................................................. 69 4 Styrelsen for Vand- og Naturforvaltning 3.6.1 Beskrivelse af område F ............................................................................................... 69 3.6.2 Sedimentet i område F ................................................................................................. 70 3.6.3 Artsantal i område F .................................................................................................... 70 3.6.4 Individtæthed i område F ............................................................................................ 71 3.6.5 Biomasse i område F .................................................................................................... 74 3.6.6 Similaritetsindex for tæthed og biomasse ................................................................... 74 3.6.7 Faunaindex for område F ............................................................................................. 76 3.6.8 Særlige arter der er værd at fremhæve ........................................................................ 76 3.6.9 Fund af fokusarter samt relevante resultater fra kortlægningen
Recommended publications
  • Role of Seabed Mapping Techniques in Environmental Monitoring and Management
    Science Series Technical Report no.127 The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers Science Series Technical Report no.127 The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers April 2006 Funded by This report should be cited as: S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough, D.S. Limpenny, P.E. Eastwood, R.L. Foster-Smith, S. Philpott, W.J. Meadows, J.W.C. James, K. Vanstaen, S. Soussi and S. Rogers, 2006. The role of seabed mapping techniques in environmental monitoring and management. Sci. Ser. Tech Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 127: 170pp. Authors responsible for writing sections of this report are as follows: Chapter 1 - S.E. Boyd, R.A. Coggan, S.N.R. Birchenough and P.E. Eastwood Chapter 2 - S.E. Boyd Chapter 3 - D.S. Limpenny, S.E. Boyd, S.N.R. Birchenough, W.J. Meadows and K. Vanstaen Chapter 4 - Part 1: R.A. Coggan and S. Philpott: Part 2: P.Eastwood. Chapter 5 - S.N.R.Birchenough, R.Foster-Smith, S.E. Boyd, W.J. Meadows, K. Vanstaen and D.S. Limpenny Chapter 6 - R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoronis Muelleri (Phoronida) Based on Immunocytochemical Staining and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy“
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OTHES DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „Analysis of the Nervous System of the Actinotroch Larva of Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida) based on Immunocytochemical Staining and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy“ Verfasserin Birgit Sonnleitner angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Naturwissenschaften (Mag.rer.nat.) Wien, 2012 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 439 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Zoologie Betreuerin / Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. DDr. Andreas Wanninger Für meine Eltern, die mich immer unterstützen Content Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................................................ 8 Animal collection and fixation ........................................................................................................ 8 Immunocytochemistry, data acquisition and analysis ..................................................................... 9 Results ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Sustainable Fisheries Management and Monitoring for Sensitive Soft- Bottom Habitats and Species in the Kattegat
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 04, 2021 Development of sustainable fisheries management and monitoring for sensitive soft- bottom habitats and species in the Kattegat Dinesen, Grete E.; McLaverty, Ciaran; Tendal, Ole S.; Eigaard, Ole R.; Pedersen, Eva Maria; Gislason, Henrik Publication date: 2020 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Dinesen, G. E., McLaverty, C., Tendal, O. S., Eigaard, O. R., Pedersen, E. M., & Gislason, H. (2020). Development of sustainable fisheries management and monitoring for sensitive soft-bottom habitats and species in the Kattegat. DTU Aqua. DTU Aqua-rapport No. 372-2020 https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/- /media/Institutter/Aqua/Publikationer/Rapporter-352-400/372-2020-Development-of-sustainable-fisheries- management-and-monitoring-for-sensitive-v2.ashx General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. S DTU Aqua National Institute of Aquatic Resources Development of sustainable fisheries management and monitoring for sensitive soft-bottom habitats and species in the Kattegat By Grete E.
    [Show full text]
  • Tranche 2 Action Plans
    For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan visit http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-5155 UK Biodiversity Group Tranche 2 Action Plans Maritime Species and Habitats THE RT HON JOHN PRESCOTT MP THE RT HON PETER MANDELSON MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE NORTHERN IRELAND ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS SARAH BOYACK MSP CHRISTINE GWYTHER AM MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT AND ASSEMBLY SECRETARY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AGRICULTURE, AND THE THE SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE RURAL DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES Dear Deputy Prime Minister, Secretary of State, Minister and Assembly Secretary, BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLANS I am writing to you in my capacity as Chairman of the United Kingdom Biodiversity Group (UKBG) about the latest group of biodiversity action plans which UKBG have completed and published in the present volume. Publication of this fifth volume in the Tranche 2 Action Plan series fulfils the undertaking, given in the Government Response to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group Report 1995, to produce maritime action plans covering further coastal and marine habitats and species. The volume includes reprints of the marine and coastal species and habitat action plans originall y published in the Steering Group’s Report, as well as new action plans for 16 species/groups of species and 17 habitats. The reprinted saline lagoon habitat action plan has an additional annex containin g statements on a further eight species whose conservation needs will be considered as part of that plan. Similarly, there are two species statements attached to the mud in deep habitats plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoronida (Phoronids)
    ■ Phoronida (Phoronids) Phylum Phoronida Number of families 1 Thumbnail description Sedentary, infaunal, benthic suspension-feeders with a vermiform (worm-like) body that bears a lophophore and is enclosed in a slender tube in which the animal moves freely and is anchored by an ampulla. Photo: A golden phoronid (Phoronopsis califor- nica) in Madeira (São Pedro, southeast coast, about 100 ft [30 m] depth) showing the helicoidal shape of the lophophore. (Photo by Peter Wirtz. Reproduced by permission.) Evolution and systematics its own coelom. A lophophore, defined as a tentacular extension The phylum Phoronida is known to have existed since the of the mesosome (and of its coelomic cavity, the mesocoelom) Devonian, but there is a poor fossil record of burrows and embraces the mouth but not the anus. The main functions of borings attributed to phoronids. Many scientists now regard the lophophore are feeding, respiration, and protection. The the Phoronida as a class within the phylum Lophophorata, site and shape of the lophophore are proportional to body size, along with the Brachiopoda and perhaps the Bryozoa. Phor- ranging from oval to horseshoe to helicoidal in relation to an onida consists of two genera, Phoronis and Phoronopsis, which increase in the number of tentacles. Phoronids have a U-shaped are characterized by the presence of an epidermal collar fold digestive tract. A nervous center is present between the mouth at the base of the lophophore. The group takes its name from and anus, as is a ring nerve at the base of the lophophore, and the genus name Phoronis, one of the numerous epithets of the the animal has one or two giant nerve fibers.
    [Show full text]
  • Lophotrochozoa, Phoronida): the Evolution of the Phoronid Body Plan and Life Cycle Elena N
    Temereva and Malakhov BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:229 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0504-0 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Metamorphic remodeling of morphology and the body cavity in Phoronopsis harmeri (Lophotrochozoa, Phoronida): the evolution of the phoronid body plan and life cycle Elena N. Temereva* and Vladimir V. Malakhov Abstract Background: Phoronids undergo a remarkable metamorphosis, in which some parts of the larval body are consumed by the juvenile and the body plan completely changes. According to the only previous hypothesis concerning the evolution of the phoronid body plan, a hypothetical ancestor of phoronids inhabited a U-shaped burrow in soft sediment, where it drew the anterior and posterior parts of the body together and eventually fused them. In the current study, we investigated the metamorphosis of Phoronopsis harmeri with light, electron, and laser confocal microscopy. Results: During metamorphosis, the larval hood is engulfed by the juvenile; the epidermis of the postroral ciliated band is squeezed from the tentacular epidermis and then engulfed; the larval telotroch undergoes cell death and disappears; and the juvenile body forms from the metasomal sack of the larva. The dorsal side of the larva becomes very short, whereas the ventral side becomes very long. The terminal portion of the juvenile body is the ampulla, which can repeatedly increase and decrease in diameter. This flexibility of the ampulla enables the juvenile to dig into the sediment. The large blastocoel of the larval collar gives rise to the lophophoral blood vessels of the juvenile. The dorsal blood vessel of the larva becomes the definitive median blood vessel.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Neotropical Diversity of Phoronids with DNA Barcoding of Planktonic Larvae
    Received: 30 April 2018 | Revised: 25 January 2019 | Accepted: 17 February 2019 DOI: 10.1111/ivb.12242 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Documenting neotropical diversity of phoronids with DNA barcoding of planktonic larvae Rachel Collin1 | Dagoberto E. Venera‐Pontón1 | Amy C. Driskell2 | Kenneth S. Macdonald2 | Kit‐Yu Karen Chan3 | Michael J. Boyle4 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Panama Abstract 2Laboratories of Analytical Biology, National Phoronid larvae, actinotrochs, are beautiful and complicated organisms which have Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian attracted as much, if not more, attention than their adult forms. We collected acti‐ Institution, Washington, DC 3Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong notrochs from the waters of the Pacific and Caribbean coasts of Panama, and used University of Science and Technology, Clear DNA barcoding of mtCOI, as well as 16S and 18S sequences, to estimate the diversity Water Bay, Hong Kong of phoronids in the region. We discovered three operational taxonomic units (OTUs) 4Smithsonian Marine Station, Fort Pierce, Florida in the Bay of Panama on the Pacific coast and four OTUs in Bocas del Toro on the Caribbean coast. Not only did all OTUs differ from each other by >10% pairwise dis‐ Correspondence Rachel Collin, Smithsonian Tropical tance in COI, but they also differed from all phoronid sequences in GenBank, includ‐ Research, Institute, Unit 9100, Box 0948, ing the four species for which adults have been reported for the Pacific of Panama, DPO AA 34002, USA Email: [email protected] Phoronopsis harmeri, Phoronis psammophila, Phoronis muelleri, and Phoronis hippocre‐ pia. In each ocean region, one common OTU was more abundant and occurred more Present Address Kit‐Yu Karen Chan, Biology frequently than other OTUs in our samples.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST COAST SPECIES of the PHYLUM PHORONIDA The
    WEST COAST SPECIES OF THE PHYLUM PHORONIDA The following seven species of phoronid adults are known from southern and central California: Phoronis architecta Phoronopsis californica % Phoronis muelleri - 3G-5CV Phoronopsis harmeri Phoronis pallida ^Phoronis psammophila Phoronis vancouverensis With the exception of Phoronis muelleri the larvae of the above are also well known here. An additional nearly cosmopolitan species Phoronis ovalis occurs in Washington and two additional widely distributed species Phoronis australis and Phoronis hippocrepia are reported from our east coast. Two further "larval species" occur in southern California, a third such form is known from Hawaii, and there may be at least two additional unidentified larvae from east coast waters. There are no described adults to match with these larval forms, so additional adult forms await discovery and description. Two additional species names may be familiar to California workers: Phoronopsis viridis is now considered a synonym of Phoronopsis harmeri and Phoronis pacifica has never been identified since the inadequate type description The Genus Phoronis Members of this genus lack the epidermal fold known as the collar which is located at the base of the lophophore in members of the only other genus Phoronopsis. Although inconsequential and sometimes inconspicuous, the collar is the only morphological feature separating the genera. Adults of the genus Phoronis are usually smaller than those of Phoronopsis Phoronis ovalis: Not yet described from southern California, but probably here. Positive identification is easy since species is diminutive (usually less than 1 cm in length), with only about 24 tentacles which are arranged in a slightly indented circle. Burrows within calcareous substrates (limestone, mollusc shells, barnacles) in which it forms aggregations by asexual budding.
    [Show full text]
  • NGS-Based Biodiversity and Community Structure Analysis of Meiofaunal Eukaryotes in Shell Sand from Hållö Island, Smögen, and Soft Mud from Gullmarn Fjord, Sweden
    Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e12731 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e12731 Research Article NGS-based biodiversity and community structure analysis of meiofaunal eukaryotes in shell sand from Hållö island, Smögen, and soft mud from Gullmarn Fjord, Sweden Quiterie Haenel‡, Oleksandr Holovachov§§, Ulf Jondelius , Per Sundberg|,¶, Sarah J. Bourlat|,¶ ‡ Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland § Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden | Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden ¶ SeAnalytics AB, Bohus-Björkö, Sweden Corresponding author: Sarah J. Bourlat ([email protected]) Academic editor: Urmas Kõljalg Received: 15 Mar 2017 | Accepted: 06 Jun 2017 | Published: 08 Jun 2017 Citation: Haenel Q, Holovachov O, Jondelius U, Sundberg P, Bourlat S (2017) NGS-based biodiversity and community structure analysis of meiofaunal eukaryotes in shell sand from Hållö island, Smögen, and soft mud from Gullmarn Fjord, Sweden. Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e12731. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e12731 Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the biodiversity and community structure of Swedish meiofaunal eukaryotes using metabarcoding. To validate the reliability of the metabarcoding approach, we compare the taxonomic resolution obtained using the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) ‘mini-barcode’ and nuclear 18S small ribosomal subunit (18S) V1-V2 region, with traditional morphology-based identication of Xenacoelomorpha and Nematoda. Location: 30 samples were analysed from two ecologically distinct locations along the west coast of Sweden. 18 replicate samples of coarse shell sand were collected along the north- eastern side of Hållö island near Smögen, while 12 replicate samples of soft mud were collected in the Gullmarn Fjord near Lysekil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Phoronida
    Adz). Ma? . Bid .. V0l . 19. 1982. pp . 1-89 . THE BIOLOGY OF PHORONIDA C . C . EMIG Station Marine d'Endoume (Laboratoire associe' au C.N.R.S.41), 13007 Marseille. France I . Introduction .......... .. .. .. .. 2 I1 . Systematics .......... .. .. .. .. .. 2 I11 . Reproduction and Embryonic Development .. .. .. .. .. 5 A . Sexual patterns and gonad morphology .. .. .. .. 5 B . Oogenesis .......... .. .. .. .. .. 8 C. 'Spermiogenesis ........ .. .. .. .. .. 8 D . Release of spermatozoa ...... .. .. .. .. .. 9 E . Fertilization ........ .. .. .. .. .. 13 F . Spawning .......... .. .. .. .. .. 14 G . Embryonic development ..... .. .. .. .. .. 14 H . Embryonic nutrition ...... .. .. .. .. .. 17 IV . Actinotroch Larvae ........ .. .. .. .. .. 17 A . General account ........ .. .. .. .. .. 17 B . Development of the actinotroch species .. .. .. .. .. 21 C . Larval settlement and metamorphosis . .. .. .. .. .. 31 D . Metamorphosis ........ .. .. .. .. .. 33 V . Ecology ............ .. .. .. .. .. 38 A . Tube ........... .. .. .. .. .. 38 B . Biotopes .......... .. .. .. .. .. 43 C. Ecological effects ........ .. .. .. .. .. 47 D . Predators of Phoronida ...... .. .. .. .. .. 49 E . Geographical distribution .... .. .. .. .. .. 50 VI . Fossil Phoronida ......... .. .. .. .. .. 50 VII. Feeding ............ .. .. .. .. .. 53 A . Lophophore and epistome .... .. .. .. .. .. 53 B . Mechanisms of feeding ...... .. .. .. .. .. 56 C. The alimentary canal ...... .. .. .. .. .. 57 D . Food particles ingested by Phoronida . .. .. .. .. .. 61 E . Uptake of
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Development, the Origin of the Coelom and the Phylogenetic
    45 Morphological and molecular affi nities of Phoronida and Brachiopoda Introduction The Phoronida Hatschek, 1888 comprise eleven species assigned to the genera Phoronis Wright, 1856 and Phoronopsis Gilchrist, 1907. They possess characteristic features such as a wormlike body that secretes a chitinous tube in which the animal lives, burrowed in the substrate. A ciliary anterior tentacle crown that is held into the water column to capture food and giant nerve fi bres running alongside the body that allow the animal a rapid retrac- tion of its entire body represent further characteristic features. Phoronids possess a biphasic life cycle, with the pelagic actinotroch larva that develops into a juvenile phoronid via a catastrophic metamorphosis. So far, the only systematic study on phoronids has been published by Emig (1985). How- ever, with only ten species and eleven characters examined, the taxon-sampling and the amount of characters analyzed in this study are very limited. This and the use of many a priori assumptions about the evolution of the characters cast doubts on the validity of the results. Thus, hitherto no comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of phoronid relationships exists. Since their fi rst discovery in 1878, the relationship of the Phoronida to other metazoan taxa could not be resolved. Most of the time, the phoronids are considered to represent a sister group of the brachiopods (Ax 1989). Their grouping in a taxon called “Tentaculata” (sensu Hatschek 1888) or “Lophophorata” (sensu Hyman 1959) together with the Bryozoa (Ectoprocta) and Brachiopoda was well accepted by subsequent textbook authors, and found support in systematic considerations on the phylogenetic position of the Phoronida by Emig (1977, 1984, 1997) and Zimmer (1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna
    Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna Irish Wildlife Manual No. 38 Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna S. E. Ferriss, K. G. Smith, and T. P. Inskipp (editors) Citations: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Section author (2009) Section title . In: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photos: © Kevin G. Smith and Sarah E. Ferriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N. Kingston and F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Inventory of Irish fauna ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]