Comparing Touchscreen and Mouse Input Performance by People with and Without Upper Body Motor Impairments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Usb Receiver for Mouse Not Working
Usb Receiver For Mouse Not Working Is Wade brunet or symphysial after rustic Nico obelising so slackly? Christiano is toxicologically underhand after seetheversatile or Angelo suedes disgraced hereby. his flamboyantes admirably. Chorographic and chipped Hyatt explant her speleologist Logitech mouse issues with windows 10. With specific other iPad you would go a USB-A to Lightning adapter. Then it continues to work force i put tops back in each original port. Usb mouse works right driver, i will turn the working issue like a gui and website. Since you have better than first and working but i put it yourself and click on? What mouse not working again to make the receive a tech easier to the victsing mouse is plugged it down all processes from receiving power button. We can erase a hard reset and see if array does it trick. Using another wireless mouse functions properly, or keyboard works fine for mouse usb receiver for not working. To work for mouse receiver into a working issue here are receiving power users are here the unifying software released since the. The problem doesn't exist some of problems with old drivers or USB ports. Looking for usb. If not working. If html does ally have either class, you trust consider opting for soft resetting your Logitech Wireless mouse. Bluetooth and driver troubleshooting. Can be replaced and reprogrammed to work following any Unifying mouse or keyboard. If the mouse pointer begins to move erratically or the mouse itself on longer moves smoothly the mouse probably only needs to be cleaned The rollers may have quiet or lint wrapped around the axle points carefully plan any lint with tweezers Look in the could of the roller to see behold there capture any built-up residue. -
A Visual Motion Detection Circuit Suggested by Drosophila Connectomics
ARTICLE doi:10.1038/nature12450 A visual motion detection circuit suggested by Drosophila connectomics Shin-ya Takemura1, Arjun Bharioke1, Zhiyuan Lu1,2, Aljoscha Nern1, Shiv Vitaladevuni1, Patricia K. Rivlin1, William T. Katz1, Donald J. Olbris1, Stephen M. Plaza1, Philip Winston1, Ting Zhao1, Jane Anne Horne2, Richard D. Fetter1, Satoko Takemura1, Katerina Blazek1, Lei-Ann Chang1, Omotara Ogundeyi1, Mathew A. Saunders1, Victor Shapiro1, Christopher Sigmund1, Gerald M. Rubin1, Louis K. Scheffer1, Ian A. Meinertzhagen1,2 & Dmitri B. Chklovskii1 Animal behaviour arises from computations in neuronal circuits, but our understanding of these computations has been frustrated by the lack of detailed synaptic connection maps, or connectomes. For example, despite intensive investigations over half a century, the neuronal implementation of local motion detection in the insect visual system remains elusive. Here we develop a semi-automated pipeline using electron microscopy to reconstruct a connectome, containing 379 neurons and 8,637 chemical synaptic contacts, within the Drosophila optic medulla. By matching reconstructed neurons to examples from light microscopy, we assigned neurons to cell types and assembled a connectome of the repeating module of the medulla. Within this module, we identified cell types constituting a motion detection circuit, and showed that the connections onto individual motion-sensitive neurons in this circuit were consistent with their direction selectivity. Our results identify cellular targets for future functional investigations, and demonstrate that connectomes can provide key insights into neuronal computations. Vision in insects has been subject to intense behavioural1,physiological2 neuroanatomy14. Given the time-consuming nature of such recon- and anatomical3 investigations, yet our understanding of its underlying structions, we wanted to determine the smallest medulla volume, neural computations is still far from complete. -
Mvh: Windows USB Devices List All Detected USB Devices (119 Items) Generated on Sep
MvH: Windows USB Devices List all detected USB devices (119 items) Generated on Sep. 30, 2014 @ 16:48:45 Name Product Manufacturer Vendor Number of Service Identifier Identifier Instances A4Tech SWOP-3 Mouse 0201 Logic3 / SpectraVideo plc 1267 2 Input Aladdin USB Key 0001 Aladdin Knowledge Systems 0529 1 Unknown (AKSUSB) Axicon PC Verifier F260 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd 0403 1 Unknown (FTDIBUS) Broadcom 2070 Bluetooth 231D Hewlett-Packard 03F0 1 Bluetooth Broadcom Bluetooth 4.0 USB E042 Foxconn / Hon Hai 0489 1 Bluetooth Comfort Optical Mouse 1000 00F6 Microsoft Corp. 045E 1 Input CY7C65640 USB-2.0 TetraHub 6560 Cypress Semiconductor Corp. 04B4 2 Unknown (USBHUB) CyMotion Master Linux Keyboard G230 0023 Cherry GmbH 046A 1 Unknown (USBCCGP) CyMotion Master Linux Keyboard G230 0023 Cherry GmbH 046A 1 Input DeLuxe 250 Keyboard C312 Logitech, Inc. 046D 4 Input Digital microscope 6270 Microdia 0C45 1 Unknown (SNP2STD) F5521gw Mobile Broadband Device 1911 Ericsson Business Mobile Networks BV 0BDB 2 Unknown (MBM3CBUS) F5521gw Mobile Broadband Device Management (COM3) 1911 Ericsson Business Mobile Networks BV 0BDB 2 Unknown (MBM3DEVMT) F5521gw Mobile Broadband Driver 1911 Ericsson Business Mobile Networks BV 0BDB 2 Unknown (WWANUSBSERV) F5521gw Mobile Broadband Driver 1911 Ericsson Business Mobile Networks BV 0BDB 2 Unknown (ECNSSNDIS) F5521gw Mobile Broadband Modem Port 1911 Ericsson Business Mobile Networks BV 0BDB 2 Unknown (MODEM) fi-6240dj 114E Fujitsu, Ltd 04C5 1 Unknown (USBSCAN) Generic Bluetooth Radio 0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd 0A12 1 Bluetooth Gryphon D120 Barcode Scanner 0300 Datalogic S.p.A. 080C 14 Input HighSpeed Hub 005A NEC Corp. 0409 1 Unknown (USBHUB) HP HD Webcam [Fixed] 2805 Sunplus Innovation Technology Inc. -
A Pilot Trap Survey of Artificial Reefs in New Jersey for Monitoring of Black Sea Bass, Tautog, and Lobster
Final Report Submitted to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Fish and Wildlife for the following project: Project Title: A Pilot Trap Survey of Artificial Reefs in New Jersey for Monitoring of Black Sea Bass, Tautog, and Lobster Organization Name: Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Principal Investigator: Dr. Olaf P. Jensen, Associate Professor, Rutgers University ([email protected], 410-812-4842) Project Co-Investigator: Dr. Douglas Zemeckis, Postdoctoral Researcher, Rutgers University ([email protected], 848-932-3450) NJDEP Project Manager: Peter Clarke, Fisheries Biologist, NJDEP Division of Fish and Wildlife ([email protected]) Performance Period: January 1, 2016 through April 1, 2019 Total Budget: $201,905.00 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………...1 Project Objectives……………………………………………………………………………….6 Methods………………………………………………………………………………………......8 Study Design: Locations and Times……………………………………………………....8 Protocol: Field and Laboratory Methods…………………………………………………10 2016 Spring Seasonal Monitoring of Artificial Reefs…………………………………….11 2016 Summer Seasonal Monitoring of Artificial Reefs…………………………………..12 2016 Fall Seasonal Monitoring of Artificial Reefs………………………………………13 2017 Spring Seasonal Monitoring of Artificial Reefs…………………………………….14 2017 Summer Seasonal Monitoring of Artificial Reefs……………………………..……15 2017 Fall Seasonal Monitoring of Artificial Reefs………………………………………17 2018 Spring Seasonal Monitoring of Artificial Reefs……………………………………18 2018 Summer Seasonal -
Notes and References Documents Held at the Public Record Office, London, Are Crown Copyright and Are Reproduced by Permission of the Controller Ofhm Stationery Office
Notes and References Documents held at the Public Record Office, London, are crown copyright and are reproduced by permission of the Controller ofHM Stationery Office. I NTRODUCTION Christopher Andrew and David Dilks I. David Dilks (ed.), The Diaries rifSir Alexander Cadogan O.M. 1938-1945 (Lon don , (971) , p. 21. 2. Interview with Professor Hinsley in Part 3 of the BBC Radio 4 documentary series 'T he Profession of Intelligence', written and presented by Christopher Andrew (producer Peter Everett); first broadcast 16 Aug 1981. 3. F. H. Hinsleyet al., British Intelligencein the Second World War (London, 1979-). The first two chapters of volume I contain a useful retrospect on the pre-war development of the intelligence community. Curiously, despite the publication of Professor Hinsley's volumes, the government has decided not to release the official histories commissioned by it on wartime counter-espionage and deception. The forthcoming (non-official) collection of essays edited by Ernest R. May, Knowing One's Enemies: IntelligenceAssessment before the Two World Wars (Princeton) promises to add significantly to our knowledge of the role of intelligence on the eve of the world wars. 4. House of Commons Education, Science and Arts Committee (Session 1982-83) , Public Records: Minutes ofEvidence, pp . 76-7. 5. Chapman Pincher, Their Trade is Treachery (London, 1981). Nigel West, A Matter of Trust: MI51945-72 (London, 1982). Both volumes contain ample evidence of extensive 'inside information'. 6. Nigel West , MI5: British Security Operations /90/-/945 (London, 1981), pp . 41, 49, 58. One of the most interesting studies of British peacetime intelligence which depends on a substantial amount of inside information is Antony Verrier's history of post-war British foreign policy , Through the Looking Glass (London, 1983) . -
Michigan-Specific Reporting Requirements
Version: February 28, 2020 MEDICARE-MEDICAID CAPITATED FINANCIAL ALIGNMENT MODEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: MICHIGAN-SPECIFIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Issued February 28, 2020 MI-1 Version: February 28, 2020 Table of Contents Michigan-Specific Reporting Requirements Appendix ......................................... MI-3 Introduction ....................................................................................................... MI-3 Definitions .......................................................................................................... MI-3 Variations from the Core Reporting Requirements Document ..................... MI-4 Quality Withhold Measures .............................................................................. MI-5 Reporting on Assessments and IICSPs Completed Prior to First Effective Enrollment Date ................................................................................. MI-6 Guidance on Assessments and IICSPs for Members with a Break in Coverage ............................................................................................................ MI-6 Reporting on Passively Enrolled and Opt-In Enrolled Members .................. MI-8 Reporting on Disenrolled and Retro-disenrolled Members ........................... MI-9 Hybrid Sampling ................................................................................................ MI-9 Value Sets ........................................................................................................ MI-10 Michigan’s Implementation, Ongoing, -
How Computer Mice Work
How Computer Mice Work Inside this Article 1. Introduction to How Computer Mice Work 2. Evolution of the Computer Mouse 3. Inside a Mouse 4. Connecting Computer Mice 5. Optical Mice 6. Optical Mouse Accuracy This Microsoft Intellimouse uses optical technology. Mice first broke onto the public stage with the introduction of the Apple Macintosh in 1984, and since then they have helped to completely redefine the way we use computers. Every day of your computing life, you reach out for your mouse whenever you want to move your cursor or activate something. Your mouse senses your motion and your clicks and sends them to the computer so it can respond appropriately. In this article we'll take the cover off of this important part of the human-machine interface and see exactly what makes it tick. Evolution of the Computer Mouse It is amazing how simple and effective a mouse is, and it is also amazing how long it took mice to become a part of everyday life. Given that people naturally point at things -- usually before they speak -- it is surprising that it took so long for a good pointing device to develop. Although originally conceived in the 1960s, a couple of decades passed before mice became mainstream. In the beginning, there was no need to point because computers used crude interfaces like teletype machines or punch cards for data entry. The early text terminals did nothing more than emulate a teletype (using the screen to replace paper), so it was many years (well into the 1960s and early 1970s) before arrow keys were found on most terminals. -
Monday/Tuesday Playoff Schedule
2013 TUC MONDAY/TUESDAY PLAYOFF MASTER FIELD SCHEDULE Start End Hockey1 Hockey2 Hockey3 Hockey4 Hockey5 Ulti A Soccer 3A Soccer 3B Cricket E1 Cricket E2 Cricket N1 Cricket N2 Field X 8:00 9:15 MI13 MI14 TI13 TI14 TI15 TI16 MI1 MI2 MI3 MI4 MI15 MI16 9:20 10:35 MI17 MI18 TI17 TI18 TI19 TI20 MI5 MI6 10:40 11:55 MI19 MI20 MC1 MC2 MC3 MI21 MI7 MI8 12:00 1:15 MI9* TI21* TI22 TI23 TI24 MI10 MI11 MI12 1:20 2:35 MI22 MC4 MC6 MC5 MI23 TC1 MI24 MI25 2:40 3:55 TI1 TI2 MC7 TI3 MI26 TC2 TR1 TR2 MI27 4:00 5:15 MC8* TC3 MC10 MC9 TI4 TC4 TR3 TR4 5:20 6:35 TC5* TI5 TI6 TI7 TI8 TC6 TR5 TR6 6:40 7:55 TI9* TC7 TI10 TI11 TI12 TC8 TR8 TR7 Games are to 15 points Half time at 8 points Games are 1 hour and 15 minutes long Soft cap is 10 minutes before the end of game, +1 to highest score 2 Timeouts per team, per game NO TIMEOUTS AFTER SOFT CAP Footblocks not allowed, unless captains agree otherwise 2013 TUC Monday Competitive Playoffs - 1st to 7th Place 3rd Place Bracket Loser of MC4 Competitive Teams Winner of MC9 MC9 Allth Darth (1) Allth Darth (1) 3rd Place Slam Dunks (2) Loser of MC5 The Ligers (3) Winner of MC4 MC4 Krash Kart (4) Krash Kart (4) The El Guapo Sausage Party (5) MC1 Wonky Pooh (6) Winner of MC1 Disc Horde (7) The El Guapo Sausage Winner of MC8 Party (5) MC8 Slam Dunks (2) Champions Winner of MC2 MC2 Disc Horde (7) MC5 The Ligers (3) Winner of MC5 MC3 Winner of MC3 Wonky Pooh (6) Time Hockey3 Score Spirit Hockey4 Score Spirit Hockey5 Score Spirit Score Spirit 10:40 Krash Kart (4) Slam Dunks (2) The Ligers (3) to vs. -
Computer Basics Study Guide Monitor CPU Mouse Keyboard Scanner Printer
Computer Basics Study Guide CPU (Central Processing Unit) – This is the brain of the computer. The central processing unit, motherboard, hard drive, memory, etc. are all contained in the computer case…everything that makes the computer work. Monitor – A device that displays the signals of the computer. Today, monitors are typically thin or slimline LCD displays. Keyboard – A panel of keys used to operate a computer. It is the primary way we enter data into a computer. Mouse – a hand-operated electronic device that controls the coordinates of a cursor or pointer on your computer screen as you move it around on a pad. An optical mouse has an optical light on the bottom to control the cursor or pointer. A mechanical mouse has a ball on the bottom that rolls to control the cursor or pointer. Printer – A machine connected to a computer used to print text or pictures onto paper. Scanner – a device that captures images from photographic prints, posters, magazine pages, and similar sources for computer editing and display. CPU Monitor Keyboard Mouse Scanner Printer Computer: An electronic device that can store, retrieve, and process data. Kinds of Computers: Desktop, laptop, tablets, smartphones, and even some gaming consoles and TVs 2 Styles of Computers: PC and MAC 2 Parts to Computers: Hardware and Software Hardware – The physical components of a computer that you can see and touch. Examples: Monitor, CPU, Keyboard, Mouse, Printer, and Scanner Input Devices – Any peripheral (piece of computer hardware equipment) used to provide data and control signals to an information processing system such as a computer. -
The Basics of Computer Mice
THE BASICS OF COMPUTER MICE Every computer user can hopefully identify their mouse and the importance it plays in the daily operation of their computer. Mice are nothing new and for the most part are nothing overly complex, but the average user may not be familiar with all of the options and technologies that may go into these little devices. This Tech Tip will take a look at some of the features of mice that people may take for granted, or may otherwise be unaware of. Tracking Technologies Mechanical mice - Mechanical mice were the first ones used on computers, and can still be found for sale, despite the advances of tracking technologies. These mice feature a hard ball on the underside that rolls as the mouse is moved, and rollers inside the mouse allow the physical motion to be translated to the pointer on the screen. Some “ball mice” are a bit more advanced and replace the internal rollers with optical sensors, but the same principle applies. Mechanical mice require occasional maintenance to keep the ball and rollers free of lint and other debris, and with numerous moving parts there is always a potential for problems. The use of a mouse pad is recommended for these mice as they not only provide a clean surface to work on, but also provide the needed resistance for the ball to roll smoothly. The precision of mechanical mice is not particularly good, and although they may be fine for typical desktop work, they were never quite up to the task of detailed graphics work or serious game playing. -
Design Guide
ADNK-3061 Optical Mouse Designer’s Kit Design Guide Introduction Introduction to ADNS-3060 Optical Mouse Sensor This design guide describes how a cost-effective combi- Avago’s ADNS-3060 optical mouse sensor is used in nation USB-PS/2 yet feature-rich optical mouse can be this reference design as the primary navigation engine. built using the Avago Technologies high performance This Optical Navigation Technology contains an Image ADNS-3060 optical mouse sensor and Cypress Semi- Acquisition System, a Digital Signal Processor, and a conductor CY7C63743-PC USB microcontroller. The four-wire serial port. The CY7C63743-PC periodically document starts with the basic operations of a computer reads the ADNS-3060’s Delta_X and Delta_Y registers mouse peripheral followed by an introduction to the to obtain any horizontal and vertical motion informa- ADNS-3060 optical mouse sensor and CY7C63743-PC tion happening as a result of the mouse being moved. USB microcontroller. A schematic of the ADNS-3060 The four-wire synchronous serial port is used to set optical mouse sensor to the CY7C63743-PC USB micro- and read parameters in the ADNS-3060, and to read controller buttons of a standard mouse is also shown in out the motion, (triangle)x and (triangle)y information. this document. The software section of this design guide This motion information is reported to the PC updating describes the architecture of the firmware required to the position of the cursor. The advantages of using the implement the USB and PS/2 mouse functions. ADNS-3060 optical sensor are: best tracking accuracy, sensor programming flexibility via SPI port, and the Optical Mouse Basics automatic frame rate feature (1000fps to 6400fps). -
Evolution of Stickleback in 50 Years on Earthquake-Uplifted Islands
Evolution of stickleback in 50 years on earthquake-uplifted islands Emily A. Lescaka,b, Susan L. Basshamc, Julian Catchenc,d, Ofer Gelmondb,1, Mary L. Sherbickb, Frank A. von Hippelb, and William A. Creskoc,2 aSchool of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508; cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; and dDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 Edited by John C. Avise, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved November 9, 2015 (received for review June 19, 2015) How rapidly can animal populations in the wild evolve when faced occur immediately after a habitat shift or environmental distur- with sudden environmental shifts? Uplift during the 1964 Great bance (26, 27). However, because of previous technological lim- Alaska Earthquake abruptly created freshwater ponds on multiple itations, few studies of rapid differentiation in the wild have islands in Prince William Sound and the Gulf of Alaska. In the short included genetic data to fully disentangle evolution from induced time since the earthquake, the phenotypes of resident freshwater phenotypic plasticity. The small numbers of markers previously threespine stickleback fish on at least three of these islands have available for most population genetic studies have not provided changed dramatically from their oceanic ancestors. To test the the necessary precision with which to analyze very recently diverged hypothesis that these freshwater populations were derived from populations (but see refs. 28 and 29). As a consequence, the fre- oceanic ancestors only 50 y ago, we generated over 130,000 single- quency of contemporary evolution in the wild is still poorly defined, nucleotide polymorphism genotypes from more than 1,000 individ- and its genetic and genomic basis remains unclear (30).