DOCSLIB.ORG

Mars 2020 (M2020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mars 2020 (M2020) Mars 2020 (M2020) Software Interface Specification Interface Title: RIMFAX Experiment Data Record (EDR) Data Products Mission: M2020 Date: July 21, 2021 Module ID: JPL D-99964 Module Type (REFerence Only or MISsion-specific info included): MIS Reference Module ID: N/A Date: N/A Signatures GDS Generating Elements: Instrument Data System Lead Stirling Algermissen ________________________________________________________ Subsystem Lead Date Science Receiving Elements: M2020 Deputy Project Scientist Kenneth H. Williford ________________________________________________________ Deputy Project Scientist Date GDS Receiving Elements: M2020 GDS Manager Jim Kurien ________________________________________________________ Manager Date M2020 GDS System Engineer Guy Pyrzak ________________________________________________________ Subsystem Engineer Date Concurrence: M2020 RIMFAX Principal Investigator Svein-Erik Hamran ________________________________________________________ Principal Investigator Date M2020 RIMFAX Deputy Principal Invest. David Paige ________________________________________________________ Deputy Principal Investigator Date M2020 RIMFAX Investigation Scientist Daniel Nunes ________________________________________________________ Investigation Scientist Date M2020 RIMFAX Instrument Engineer Christina Diaz ________________________________________________________ Instrument Engineer Date PDS Program Manager Tim McClanahan ________________________________________________________ Manager Date PDS Geosciences Node Manager Ray Arvidson ________________________________________________________ Manager Date Mars 2020 Project Software Interface Specification (SIS) RIMFAX Experiment Data Record (EDR) Data Products Version 1.0.6 Custodians: Rafael Alanis and Hyun Lee JPL D-99964 July 21, 2021 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology The research described in this document was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). © 2021 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. JPL D-99964 M2020 RIMFAX EDR Data Products SIS, Version 1.0 CHANGE LOG DATE SECTIONS CHANGED REASON FOR REVISION CHANGE 7/23 Added Mats Jorgen edits (Patrick) 1.0.1 7/23 Accept all formatting and trivial changes (Patrick) 1.0.2 7/23 Remove Appendix A & B (Label examples) and D 1.0.3 (Rafael already did) (Patrick) 7/26 Remove/add white space, breaks, and related 1.0.4 organization (Patrick) 7/27 Minor edits and accept straightforward changes (eg 1.0.5 corrections, prev missions, resolved comments (Patrick) 7/27 Add appendix from Bob Deen/Rafael 1.0.6 i JPL D-99964 M2020 RIMFAX EDR Data Products SIS, Version 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Change Log ..........................................................................................................................i List of Figures ...................................................................................................................vii List of Tables ....................................................................................................................viii Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ix 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................1 1.2 Contents ...................................................................................................................1 1.3 Constraints and Applicable Documents ................................................................1 1.3.1 Relationships with Other Interfaces ..........................................................2 2. INSTRUMENT OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................................3 2.1 Instrument Operation ..............................................................................................3 2.1.1 Operational Use Cases ..............................................................................4 2.1.2 Instrument Hardware..................................................................................4 2.2 Instrument Data Collection .....................................................................................7 2.2.1 Sounding Data Acquisition ........................................................................7 2.2.2 Calibration ..................................................................................................9 2.2.3 Housekeeping .............................................................................................9 3. GENERAL DATA PRODUCT OVERVIEW .................................................................................10 3.1 Data Processing Levels .........................................................................................10 3.2 Product Label Descriptions ..................................................................................10 3.2.1 Overview of Labels ...................................................................................10 3.2.2 PDS4 Labels .............................................................................................11 3.3 Binary Data Storage Conventions ........................................................................13 3.3.1 Bit and Byte Ordering ..............................................................................13 4. EDR PRODUCT SPECIFICATION .............................................................................................14 4.1 EDR General Processing .......................................................................................14 4.2 EDR Product Types ...............................................................................................15 4.2.1 “GPR Sounding Measurements” EDRs ..................................................16 4.2.1.1 Active Mode with the Antenna........................................................... 16 4.2.1.2 Active Mode with the Calibration Cable .............................................16 4.2.1.3 Passive Mode with the Antenna ........................................................17 4.2.1.4 Passive Mode with Calibration Cable ................................................17 4.2.2 “Housekeeping” EDRs .............................................................................17 4.2.3 “Fault Condition” EDRs ...........................................................................17 4.3 EDR Product Format ..............................................................................................17 4.4 EDR Product Structure ..........................................................................................18 4.5 EDR Product Validation .........................................................................................21 5. STANDARDS USED IN GENERATING PRODUCTS ................................................................. 22 5.1 File Naming Standards ..........................................................................................22 5.1.1 EDR Filename ...........................................................................................23 6. STANDARDS .............................................................................................................................35 6.1 PDS Standards .......................................................................................................35 6.2 Time Standards ......................................................................................................35 6.3 Coordinate Frame Standards ................................................................................3 6 ii JPL D-99964 M2020 RIMFAX EDR Data Products SIS, Version 1.0 6.3.1 Rover Navigation (Rover Nav) Frame .....................................................36 6.3.2 Rover Mechanical (Rover Mech) Frame ..................................................38 6.3.3 Local Level Frame ....................................................................................38 6.3.4 Site Frame ................................................................................................. 38 6.3.5 RSM Frame ...............................................................................................39 6.3.6 Arm Frames ..............................................................................................39 6.3.7 RIMFAX Antenna Frame ...........................................................................40 7. APPLICABLE SOFTWARE ........................................................................................................41 7.1 Utility Programs .....................................................................................................41 7.2 Applicable PDS Software Tools ............................................................................41 7.3 Software Distribution and Update Procedures ....................................................41 APPENDIX A. Telemetry Data Product (Dp) Types Matched to EDR Product Types ........... 43 APPENDIX B. Product Label Keyword Definitions, Values, and Sources ............................. 44 iii JPL D-99964 M2020 RIMFAX EDR Data Products SIS, Version 1.0 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1.2.1 – RIMFAX Hardware Interfaces with RCE’s ................................................................. 5 Figure 2.1.2.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planetary Report Report
    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXIX Number 1 January/February 2009 Beyond The Moon From The Editor he Internet has transformed the way science is On the Cover: Tdone—even in the realm of “rocket science”— The United States has the opportunity to unify and inspire the and now anyone can make a real contribution, as world’s spacefaring nations to create a future brightened by long as you have the will to give your best. new goals, such as the human exploration of Mars and near- In this issue, you’ll read about a group of amateurs Earth asteroids. Inset: American astronaut Peggy A. Whitson who are helping professional researchers explore and Russian cosmonaut Yuri I. Malenchenko try out training Mars online, encouraged by Mars Exploration versions of Russian Orlan spacesuits. Background: The High Rovers Project Scientist Steve Squyres and Plane- Resolution Camera on Mars Express took this snapshot of tary Society President Jim Bell (who is also head Candor Chasma, a valley in the northern part of Valles of the rovers’ Pancam team.) Marineris, on July 6, 2006. Images: Gagarin Cosmonaut Training This new Internet-enabled fun is not the first, Center. Background: ESA nor will it be the only, way people can participate in planetary exploration. The Planetary Society has been encouraging our members to contribute Background: their minds and energy to science since 1984, A dust storm blurs the sky above a volcanic caldera in this image when the Pallas Project helped to determine the taken by the Mars Color Imager on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter shape of a main-belt asteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
    Chapter 6 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Jim Taylor, Dennis K. Lee, and Shervin Shambayati 6.1 Mission Overview The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) [1, 2] has a suite of instruments making observations at Mars, and it provides data-relay services for Mars landers and rovers. MRO was launched on August 12, 2005. The orbiter successfully went into orbit around Mars on March 10, 2006 and began reducing its orbit altitude and circularizing the orbit in preparation for the science mission. The orbit changing was accomplished through a process called aerobraking, in preparation for the “science mission” starting in November 2006, followed by the “relay mission” starting in November 2008. MRO participated in the Mars Science Laboratory touchdown and surface mission that began in August 2012 (Chapter 7). MRO communications has operated in three different frequency bands: 1) Most telecom in both directions has been with the Deep Space Network (DSN) at X-band (~8 GHz), and this band will continue to provide operational commanding, telemetry transmission, and radiometric tracking. 2) During cruise, the functional characteristics of a separate Ka-band (~32 GHz) downlink system were verified in preparation for an operational demonstration during orbit operations. After a Ka-band hardware anomaly in cruise, the project has elected not to initiate the originally planned operational demonstration (with yet-to-be­ used redundant Ka-band hardware). 201 202 Chapter 6 3) A new-generation ultra-high frequency (UHF) (~400 MHz) system was verified with the Mars Exploration Rovers in preparation for the successful relay communications with the Phoenix lander in 2008 and the later Mars Science Laboratory relay operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – a Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration
    Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Report by the NASA Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG) November 2020 Front Cover: Artist Concepts Top (Artist concepts, left to right): Early Mars1; Molecules in Space2; Astronaut and Rover on Mars1; Exo-Planet System1. Bottom: Pillinger Point, Endeavour Crater, as imaged by the Opportunity rover1. Credits: 1NASA; 2Discovery Magazine Citation: Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG), Jakosky, B. M., et al. (2020). Mars, the Nearest Habitable World—A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration. MASWG Members • Bruce Jakosky, University of Colorado (chair) • Richard Zurek, Mars Program Office, JPL (co-chair) • Shane Byrne, University of Arizona • Wendy Calvin, University of Nevada, Reno • Shannon Curry, University of California, Berkeley • Bethany Ehlmann, California Institute of Technology • Jennifer Eigenbrode, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center • Tori Hoehler, NASA/Ames Research Center • Briony Horgan, Purdue University • Scott Hubbard, Stanford University • Tom McCollom, University of Colorado • John Mustard, Brown University • Nathaniel Putzig, Planetary Science Institute • Michelle Rucker, NASA/JSC • Michael Wolff, Space Science Institute • Robin Wordsworth, Harvard University Ex Officio • Michael Meyer, NASA Headquarters ii Mars, the Nearest Habitable World October 2020 MASWG Table of Contents Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C
    51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2020) 2663.pdf THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C. M. McKinney1, R. G. Willson1, R. G. Sellar1, D. S. Copley-Woods1, M. Valvo1, T. Goodsall1, J. McGuire1, K. Singh1, T. E. Litwin1, R. G. Deen1, A. Cul- ver1, N. Ruoff1, D. Petrizzo1, 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, [email protected]). Introduction: The Mars 2020 Rover is equipped pairs (the Cachecam, a monoscopic camera, is an ex- with a neXt-generation engineering camera imaging ception). The Mars 2020 engineering cameras are system that represents a significant upgrade over the packaged into a single, compact camera head (see fig- previous Navcam/Hazcam cameras flown on MER and ure 1). MSL [1,2]. The Mars 2020 engineering cameras ac- quire color images with wider fields of view and high- er angular/spatial resolution than previous rover engi- neering cameras. Additionally, the Mars 2020 rover will carry a new camera type dedicated to sample op- erations: the Cachecam. History: The previous generation of Navcams and Hazcams, known collectively as the engineering cam- eras, were designed in the early 2000s as part of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) program. A total of Figure 1. Flight Navcam (left), Flight Hazcam (middle), 36 individual MER-style cameras have flown to Mars and flight Cachecam (right). The Cachecam optical assem- on five separate NASA spacecraft (3 rovers and 2 bly includes an illuminator and fold mirror. landers) [1-6]. The MER/MSL cameras were built in two separate production runs: the original MER run Each of the Mars 2020 engineering cameras utilize a (2003) and a second, build-to-print run for the Mars 20 megapixel OnSemi (CMOSIS) CMOS sensor Science Laboratory (MSL) mission in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation and Performance of the Mars Exploration Rover Imaging System on the Martian Surface
    Operation and Performance of the Mars Exploration Rover Imaging System on the Martian Surface Justin N. Maki Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA USA [email protected] Todd Litwin, Mark Schwochert Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA USA Ken Herkenhoff United States Geological Survey Flagstaff, AZ USA Abstract - The Imaging System on the Mars Exploration Rovers has successfully operated on the surface of Mars for over one Earth year. The acquisition of hundreds of panoramas and tens of thousands of stereo pairs has enabled the rovers to explore Mars at a level of detail unprecedented in the history of space exploration. In addition to providing scientific value, the images also play a key role in the daily tactical operation of the rovers. The mobile nature of the MER surface mission requires extensive use of the imaging system for traverse planning, rover localization, remote sensing instrument targeting, and robotic arm placement. Each of these activity types requires a different set of data compression rates, surface Figure 1. The Mars Exploration Spirit Rover, as viewed by coverage, and image acquisition strategies. An overview the Navcam shortly after lander egress early in the mission. of the surface imaging activities is provided, along with a presents an overview of the operation and performance of summary of the image data acquired to date. the MER Imaging System. Keywords: Imaging system, cameras, rovers, Mars, 1.2 Imaging System Design operations. The MER cameras are classified into five types: Descent cameras, Navigation cameras (Navcam), Hazard Avoidance 1 Introduction cameras (Hazcam), Panoramic cameras (Pancam), and Microscopic Imager (MI) cameras.
    [Show full text]
  • SATELLITE DATA for Weather Forecasting
    VOL. 98 NO. 3 MAR 2017 Mars 2020 Mission Earth Science Jobs: Seven Projections Earth & Space Science News Landsat Archive of Greenland Glaciers SATELLITE DATA for Weather Forecasting Earth & Space Science News Contents MARCH 2017 VOLUME 98, ISSUE 3 PROJECT UPDATE 20 Using LANDSAT to Take the Long View on Greenland Glaciers A new web-based data portal gives scientists access to more than 40 years of satellite imagery, providing seasonal to long-term insights into outflows from Greenland’s ice sheet. PROJECT UPDATE 32 Seeking Signs of Life and More: NASA’s Mars 2020 Mission The next Mars rover will be able to land near rugged terrain, giving scientists access to diverse landscapes. It will also cache core samples, a first step in the quest 26 to return samples to Earth. COVER OPINION Transforming Satellite Data Seven Projections 14 for Earth and Space into Weather Forecasts Science Jobs What do recent political changes mean A NASA project spans the gap between research and operations, for the job market? In the short term, not introducing new composites of satellite imagery to weather much. But long term, expect privatization, forecasters. contract employment, and more. Earth & Space Science News Eos.org // 1 Contents DEPARTMENTS Editor in Chief Barbara T. Richman: AGU, Washington, D. C., USA; eos_ [email protected] Editors Christina M. S. Cohen Wendy S. Gordon Carol A. Stein California Institute Ecologia Consulting, Department of Earth and of Technology, Pasadena, Austin, Texas, USA; Environmental Sciences, Calif., USA; wendy@ecologiaconsulting University of Illinois at cohen@srl .caltech.edu .com Chicago, Chicago, Ill., José D.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Curiosity in Gale Crater, and Other Landed Mars Missions
    44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2013) 2534.pdf LOCALIZATION AND ‘CONTEXTUALIZATION’ OF CURIOSITY IN GALE CRATER, AND OTHER LANDED MARS MISSIONS. T. J. Parker1, M. C. Malin2, F. J. Calef1, R. G. Deen1, H. E. Gengl1, M. P. Golombek1, J. R. Hall1, O. Pariser1, M. Powell1, R. S. Sletten3, and the MSL Science Team. 1Jet Propulsion Labora- tory, California Inst of Technology ([email protected]), 2Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, CA ([email protected] ), 3University of Washington, Seattle. Introduction: Localization is a process by which tactical updates are made to a mobile lander’s position on a planetary surface, and is used to aid in traverse and science investigation planning and very high- resolution map compilation. “Contextualization” is hereby defined as placement of localization infor- mation into a local, regional, and global context, by accurately localizing a landed vehicle, then placing the data acquired by that lander into context with orbiter data so that its geologic context can be better charac- terized and understood. Curiosity Landing Site Localization: The Curi- osity landing was the first Mars mission to benefit from the selection of a science-driven descent camera (both MER rovers employed engineering descent im- agers). Initial data downlinked after the landing fo- Fig 1: Portion of mosaic of MARDI EDL images. cused on rover health and Entry-Descent-Landing MARDI imaged the landing site and science target (EDL) performance. Front and rear Hazcam images regions in color. were also downloaded, along with a number of When is localization done? MARDI thumbnail images. The Hazcam images were After each drive for which Navcam stereo da- used primarily to determine the rover’s orientation by ta has been acquired post-drive and terrain meshes triangulation to the horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars Science Laboratory (Msl) Navigation Cameras (Navcams)
    42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011) 2738.pdf THE MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY (MSL) NAVIGATION CAMERAS (NAVCAMS). J. N. Maki1, D. Thiessen1, A.Pourangi1, P. Kobzeff1, L. Scherr1, T. Elliott1, A. Dingizian1, Beverly St. Ange1, 1Jet Propulsion La- boratory/California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109. Introduction: The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) The camera plate, which also holds the Mastcam and Rover (scheduled for launch in November/December Chemcam instruments, is mounted to a 0.85-meter 2011) will fly four Navigation Cameras (Navcams). high Remote Sensing Mast (RSM), which points the The key requirements of the Navcam imaging system cameras in the azimuth and elevation directions. The are: 1) provide terrain context for traverse planning RSM is attached to the rover deck, which is 1.1 meters and Mastcam/Chemcam pointing, 2) provide a 360- above the nominal surface. The resultant configura- degree field of regard at <1 mrad/pixel angular resolu- tion places the Navcams 1.9 meters above the Martian tion, 3) provide stereo ranging data out to 100 m, and surface (0.4 meters higher than the MER Navcams). 4) use of a broadband, visible filter. The Navcams The MSL Navcams are build-to-print copies were built at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasade- of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) cameras, which na, CA. are described in detail in [1]. The main difference Instrument Details: The mounting locations of the between the MER and MSL cameras is that the MSL Navcams are shown in figure 1. Navcams have slightly more powerful heaters to allow operation at colder ambient temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Imager for Mars' Subsurface Experiment—RIMFAX
    Space Sci Rev (2020) 216:128 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00740-4 Radar Imager for Mars’ Subsurface Experiment—RIMFAX Svein-Erik Hamran1 · David A. Paige2 · Hans E.F. Amundsen3 · Tor Berger 4 · Sverre Brovoll4 · Lynn Carter5 · Leif Damsgård4 · Henning Dypvik1 · Jo Eide6 · Sigurd Eide1 · Rebecca Ghent7 · Øystein Helleren4 · Jack Kohler8 · Mike Mellon9 · Daniel C. Nunes10 · Dirk Plettemeier11 · Kathryn Rowe2 · Patrick Russell2 · Mats Jørgen Øyan4 Received: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The Radar Imager for Mars’ Subsurface Experiment (RIMFAX) is a Ground Pen- etrating Radar on the Mars 2020 mission’s Perseverance rover, which is planned to land near a deltaic landform in Jezero crater. RIMFAX will add a new dimension to rover investiga- tions of Mars by providing the capability to image the shallow subsurface beneath the rover. The principal goals of the RIMFAX investigation are to image subsurface structure, and to provide information regarding subsurface composition. Data provided by RIMFAX will aid Perseverance’s mission to explore the ancient habitability of its field area and to select a set of promising geologic samples for analysis, caching, and eventual return to Earth. RIM- FAX is a Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar, which transmits a signal swept through a range of frequencies, rather than a single wide-band pulse. The operating frequency range of 150–1200 MHz covers the typical frequencies of GPR used in geology. In general, the full bandwidth (with effective center frequency of 675 MHz) will be used for The Mars 2020 Mission Edited by Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars Science Laboratory Engineering Cameras
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-012-9882-4 The Mars Science Laboratory Engineering Cameras J. Maki · D. Thiessen · A. Pourangi · P. Kobzeff · T. Litwin · L. Scherr · S. Elliott · A. Dingizian · M. Maimone Received: 21 December 2011 / Accepted: 5 April 2012 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover is equipped with a set of 12 en- gineering cameras. These cameras are build-to-print copies of the Mars Exploration Rover cameras described in Maki et al. (J. Geophys. Res. 108(E12): 8071, 2003). Images returned from the engineering cameras will be used to navigate the rover on the Martian surface, de- ploy the rover robotic arm, and ingest samples into the rover sample processing system. The Navigation cameras (Navcams) are mounted to a pan/tilt mast and have a 45-degree square field of view (FOV) with a pixel scale of 0.82 mrad/pixel. The Hazard Avoidance Cameras (Hazcams) are body-mounted to the rover chassis in the front and rear of the vehicle and have a 124-degree square FOV with a pixel scale of 2.1 mrad/pixel. All of the cameras uti- lize a 1024 × 1024 pixel detector and red/near IR bandpass filters centered at 650 nm. The MSL engineering cameras are grouped into two sets of six: one set of cameras is connected to rover computer “A” and the other set is connected to rover computer “B”. The Navcams and Front Hazcams each provide similar views from either computer. The Rear Hazcams provide different views from the two computers due to the different mounting locations of the “A” and “B” Rear Hazcams.
    [Show full text]
  • 37131054409156D.Pdf
    YEZAD A Romance of the Unknown By GEORGE BABCOCK PUBLISHED BY CO-OPERATIVE PUBLISHING CO., INC. BRIDGEPORT, CONN. NEW YORK, N. Y. Copyright, November, 1922, by GEORGE BABCOCK All rights reserved To MY S1sTER, EVA STANTON (BABCOCK) BROWNING., this story 1s affectionately inscribed. GEORGE BABCOCK. Brooklyn, N. Y. November, 19ff. CHARACTERS l JOHN BACON, Aviator. 2 JuLIA BACON, His Wife. 3 PAUL BACON, Son. 4 ELLEN BACON, Daughter. 5 AnoLPH VON PosEN, Inventor, in love. 6 SALLY T1MPOLE, the Cook, also in love. 7 JASPER PERKINS } 8 SILAS CUMMINGS The old quaint cronies. 9 NANCY PRINDLE 10 DOCTOR PETER KLOUSE. 11 HESTER DOUGLASS} 12 F IN LEY D OU GLASS Grandchildren of the Doctor. 13 SAM WILLIS, the dreadful liar. 14 WILLIAM THADDEUS TITUS, Champion of several trades. 15 WILLIAM GRENNELL, the Village Blacksmith. 16 MINNA BACON } 17 B RENDA B ACON Children of Paul and Hester. 18 RoBERT DouGLAss, Son of Finley and Ellen. 19 CHARLOTTE Dun LEY, a Maiden of Mars. 20 CHRISTOPHER SPENCER, Astronomer of Mars. 21 FELIX CLAUDIO, the Devil's Son. 22 DocToR NATHAN ELIZABRAT of Mars. 23 MARCOMET, a Guard of the Great White \Vay. 24 JOHN BACON'S DUALITY. Note:-A Glossary of coined and unusual words and their mean­ ing, used by the author in Yezad, will be found on pages 449 to 463. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I THE PRICE OF PROGRESS 1 II THE GHOST • 20 III NEW NEIGHBORS 33 IV DOCTOR KLOUSE 45 V HEREDITY VS. KLOUSE PHILOSOPHY 52 VI A DREADFUL LIAR • 57 VII AMONG THE ABORIGINES 71 VIII AN ODD EXPERIMENT .
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Mars Rover Traverses
    Simulations of Mars Rover Traverses •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Feng Zhou, Raymond E. Arvidson, and Keith Bennett Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Brian Trease, Randel Lindemann, and Paolo Bellutta California Institute of Technology/Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91011 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Karl Iagnemma and Carmine Senatore Robotic Mobility GroupMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received 7 December 2012; accepted 21 August 2013 Artemis (Adams-based Rover Terramechanics and Mobility Interaction Simulator) is a software tool developed to simulate rigid-wheel planetary rover traverses across natural terrain surfaces. It is based on mechanically realistic rover models and the use of classical terramechanics expressions to model spatially variable wheel-soil and wheel-bedrock properties. Artemis’s capabilities and limitations for the Mars Exploration Rovers (Spirit and Opportunity) were explored using single-wheel laboratory-based tests, rover field tests at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Mars Yard, and tests on bedrock and dune sand surfaces in the Mojave Desert. Artemis was then used to provide physical insight into the high soil sinkage and slippage encountered by Opportunity while crossing an aeolian ripple on the Meridiani plains and high motor currents encountered while driving on a tilted bedrock surface at Cape York on the rim of Endeavour Crater. Artemis will continue to evolve and is intended to be used on a continuing basis as a tool to help evaluate mobility issues over candidate Opportunity and the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover drive paths, in addition to retrieval of terrain properties by the iterative registration of model and actual drive results.
    [Show full text]