Operation and Performance of the Mars Exploration Rover Imaging System on the Martian Surface

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation and Performance of the Mars Exploration Rover Imaging System on the Martian Surface Operation and Performance of the Mars Exploration Rover Imaging System on the Martian Surface Justin N. Maki Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA USA [email protected] Todd Litwin, Mark Schwochert Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA USA Ken Herkenhoff United States Geological Survey Flagstaff, AZ USA Abstract - The Imaging System on the Mars Exploration Rovers has successfully operated on the surface of Mars for over one Earth year. The acquisition of hundreds of panoramas and tens of thousands of stereo pairs has enabled the rovers to explore Mars at a level of detail unprecedented in the history of space exploration. In addition to providing scientific value, the images also play a key role in the daily tactical operation of the rovers. The mobile nature of the MER surface mission requires extensive use of the imaging system for traverse planning, rover localization, remote sensing instrument targeting, and robotic arm placement. Each of these activity types requires a different set of data compression rates, surface Figure 1. The Mars Exploration Spirit Rover, as viewed by coverage, and image acquisition strategies. An overview the Navcam shortly after lander egress early in the mission. of the surface imaging activities is provided, along with a presents an overview of the operation and performance of summary of the image data acquired to date. the MER Imaging System. Keywords: Imaging system, cameras, rovers, Mars, 1.2 Imaging System Design operations. The MER cameras are classified into five types: Descent cameras, Navigation cameras (Navcam), Hazard Avoidance 1 Introduction cameras (Hazcam), Panoramic cameras (Pancam), and Microscopic Imager (MI) cameras. The Descent camera, 1.1 Mission attached to the landing system, acquired 3 images during In January 2004, the Mars Exploration Rover Project the Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) phase of the (MER) landed a pair of Rovers onto the surface of Mars mission and was subsequently abandoned as the rover [1]. Each rover (see figure 1) carried a set of 10 cameras drove onto the surface. The other nine cameras are [2]. Upon landing, the cameras immediately began attached to the rover - the Navcam and Pancam cameras are acquiring images of the Martian terrain and returned over mounted at the top of a pan/tilt mast and the Hazcams are 70,000 individual images in the first Earth year of hard-mounted directly to the rover body. All 9 cameras operation. The cameras have made significant have been extensively used during the surface operations contributions to the mission, including the acquisition of phase of the mission. images that show evidence of past liquid water on the Navigation planning and Rover localization are Martian surface [3]. This paper performed primarily with Navcam panoramas and single frame images, although in the cases where long-distance Authorized licensed use limited to: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on April 16,2010 at 22:54:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. traverse designation is desired, the higher-resolution Cameras MER Engineering Camera Description Pancam cameras [4] are used. Operation of the rover’s and Objectives robotic arm, also called the Instrument Deployment Device Descent Acquire 3 images of the Martian surface (IDD) [5], is done with Front Hazcam imagery. Auto- Camera between altitudes of 2000 m and 1200 navigation is performed with either Navcam or Hazcam meters during descent. Field of view: 45 imagery. In addition to the engineering functions described degrees, 3-meter/pixel spatial resolution. above, all of the cameras are used for purposes of scientific Broadband, visible filter. investigation, with the Pancam [4] and Microscopic Imager [6] acquiring the majority of scientific image data. Navcams Provide terrain context for traverse Because of their operational uses, the cameras are planning and Pancam, Mini-TES grouped into two types: “engineering” cameras and pointing. 360-degree field of regard at <1 “science” cameras. All of the MER cameras share the same mrad/pixel angular resolution. Stereo electronics design [2] and differ only in their optical ranging out to 100 meters (30 cm stereo properties (with the exception of the descent imager, which baseline). Broadband, visible filter. has a slightly different video gain). Tables 1 and 2 show the operational descriptions of the engineering and science Hazcams Provide image data for the onboard cameras, respectively. detection of navigation hazards during a 1.3 Hardware traverse. Provide terrain context immediately forward and aft of the rover All of the MER Cameras were built at the Jet Propulsion (in particular the area not viewable by the Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, CA, under a fast-paced 32- Navcams) for traverse planning. Support month development schedule. The camera designs were Instrument Deployment Device (IDD) developed as a collaborative effort between members of the operations. Support Rover fine MER team at JPL and MER science team members at positioning near IDD targets. Wide field Cornell University in Ithaca, NY and the United States of view (120 degrees), 2 mrad/pixel Geological Survey (USGS) in Flagstaff, AZ. For details angular resolution. Stereo ranging about the camera hardware, see [2]. immediately in front of the rover (10 cm 1.4 Flight Software stereo baseline) to an accuracy of +/- 5 The MER onboard flight imaging software is described in mm. Broadband, visible filter. detail in [7]. The onboard image processing capabilities of Table 1. A description of the MER Engineering Cameras, the flight system are extensive and include: autoexposure, from [2]. image subframe extraction, image spatial downsampling, and image compression. The system also includes the Cameras MER Science Camera Description and capability to point the mast-mounted cameras in a number Objectives of surface-based coordinate frames and at selected Pancam [4] Obtain monoscopic and stereoscopic astronomical targets such as the sun and the Martian image mosaics. Obtain multispectral moons. visible to short-wave near-IR images For every image acquired by the rover, the MER Imaging over a range of viewing geometries. Services flight software generates a small (64 x 64 pixel) Obtain images of the Sun and Martian “thumbnail image”. These thumbnail images are sent back sky. Serve as the primary Sun-finding to Earth at a relatively high priority and are usually camera for rover navigation. Resolve downlinked the same day. The thumbnail images allow objects on the scale of the rover wheels ground operators to preview an image before the full image to distances of ~100 m. Support is downlinked. This opens the possibility for the operators acquisition and release of exciting E/PO to verify the success of certain imaging acquisitions and products. confirm to the rest of the operations team that the rover can move to the next target before the full images are received Microscopi Image fine-scale morphology of natural (receipt of the full images often happens several days later). c Imager [6] surfaces. Image fine-scale texture and The thumbnails are also sometimes used to reprioritize reflectance of abraded surfaces. Aid in image data for higher (or lower) downlink transmission. the interpretation of data gathered by 1.5 Ground Software other instruments by imaging areas examined by them at high resolution. Aspects of the MER ground image processing software are described in detail in [2], [8] and [9]. The ground Table 2. A description of the MER Science Cameras image processing software decompresses the image data, (Pancam [4] and Microscopic Imager [6]). assembles ancillary information into the image header, and writes the image to an Experiment Data Record (EDR) file Authorized licensed use limited to: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on April 16,2010 at 22:54:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. in PDS (Planetary Data System) format. The raw EDR 2.1.1 Uplink Process and Sol Types files are processed further into Reduced Data Record Camera commands are generated on Earth and sent to the (RDR) files. The RDR file types are numerous and include Rovers on Mars as part of the MER 10-hour daily uplink stereo correlation maps, mosaics, and 3-dimensional terrain process. Each rover has a dedicated uplink team per sol, meshes. and the two teams operate independently of one another on any given sol. The uplink process begins upon examination 2 MER Surface Imaging Operations of the most recent image data from the rovers, typically performed within hours (sometimes minutes) of data receipt The MER cameras have returned over 73,000 images as on Earth. During the MER primary mission (Sols 1 of 13 March 2005 (table 3). The camera hardware (and through 90) the generation of the camera commands associated software) has functioned nominally since (approximately 150 per sol, per rover) required 3 landing. The cameras and flight software have been operations personnel per sol, per rover. The introduction of utilized as expected, and the ground software has efficiencies and software automation has reduced the performed extremely well – over 750,000 derived image number of camera sequencing personnel to 2 operations products have been generated on the ground [8]. personnel per day, per rover. We have considered the The majority of the images acquired during a typical sol possibility of utilizing 1 operations personnel per day per on Mars are scientific in purpose. This paper discusses the
Recommended publications
  • Planetary Report Report
    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXIX Number 1 January/February 2009 Beyond The Moon From The Editor he Internet has transformed the way science is On the Cover: Tdone—even in the realm of “rocket science”— The United States has the opportunity to unify and inspire the and now anyone can make a real contribution, as world’s spacefaring nations to create a future brightened by long as you have the will to give your best. new goals, such as the human exploration of Mars and near- In this issue, you’ll read about a group of amateurs Earth asteroids. Inset: American astronaut Peggy A. Whitson who are helping professional researchers explore and Russian cosmonaut Yuri I. Malenchenko try out training Mars online, encouraged by Mars Exploration versions of Russian Orlan spacesuits. Background: The High Rovers Project Scientist Steve Squyres and Plane- Resolution Camera on Mars Express took this snapshot of tary Society President Jim Bell (who is also head Candor Chasma, a valley in the northern part of Valles of the rovers’ Pancam team.) Marineris, on July 6, 2006. Images: Gagarin Cosmonaut Training This new Internet-enabled fun is not the first, Center. Background: ESA nor will it be the only, way people can participate in planetary exploration. The Planetary Society has been encouraging our members to contribute Background: their minds and energy to science since 1984, A dust storm blurs the sky above a volcanic caldera in this image when the Pallas Project helped to determine the taken by the Mars Color Imager on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter shape of a main-belt asteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C
    51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2020) 2663.pdf THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C. M. McKinney1, R. G. Willson1, R. G. Sellar1, D. S. Copley-Woods1, M. Valvo1, T. Goodsall1, J. McGuire1, K. Singh1, T. E. Litwin1, R. G. Deen1, A. Cul- ver1, N. Ruoff1, D. Petrizzo1, 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, [email protected]). Introduction: The Mars 2020 Rover is equipped pairs (the Cachecam, a monoscopic camera, is an ex- with a neXt-generation engineering camera imaging ception). The Mars 2020 engineering cameras are system that represents a significant upgrade over the packaged into a single, compact camera head (see fig- previous Navcam/Hazcam cameras flown on MER and ure 1). MSL [1,2]. The Mars 2020 engineering cameras ac- quire color images with wider fields of view and high- er angular/spatial resolution than previous rover engi- neering cameras. Additionally, the Mars 2020 rover will carry a new camera type dedicated to sample op- erations: the Cachecam. History: The previous generation of Navcams and Hazcams, known collectively as the engineering cam- eras, were designed in the early 2000s as part of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) program. A total of Figure 1. Flight Navcam (left), Flight Hazcam (middle), 36 individual MER-style cameras have flown to Mars and flight Cachecam (right). The Cachecam optical assem- on five separate NASA spacecraft (3 rovers and 2 bly includes an illuminator and fold mirror. landers) [1-6]. The MER/MSL cameras were built in two separate production runs: the original MER run Each of the Mars 2020 engineering cameras utilize a (2003) and a second, build-to-print run for the Mars 20 megapixel OnSemi (CMOSIS) CMOS sensor Science Laboratory (MSL) mission in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Curiosity in Gale Crater, and Other Landed Mars Missions
    44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2013) 2534.pdf LOCALIZATION AND ‘CONTEXTUALIZATION’ OF CURIOSITY IN GALE CRATER, AND OTHER LANDED MARS MISSIONS. T. J. Parker1, M. C. Malin2, F. J. Calef1, R. G. Deen1, H. E. Gengl1, M. P. Golombek1, J. R. Hall1, O. Pariser1, M. Powell1, R. S. Sletten3, and the MSL Science Team. 1Jet Propulsion Labora- tory, California Inst of Technology ([email protected]), 2Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, CA ([email protected] ), 3University of Washington, Seattle. Introduction: Localization is a process by which tactical updates are made to a mobile lander’s position on a planetary surface, and is used to aid in traverse and science investigation planning and very high- resolution map compilation. “Contextualization” is hereby defined as placement of localization infor- mation into a local, regional, and global context, by accurately localizing a landed vehicle, then placing the data acquired by that lander into context with orbiter data so that its geologic context can be better charac- terized and understood. Curiosity Landing Site Localization: The Curi- osity landing was the first Mars mission to benefit from the selection of a science-driven descent camera (both MER rovers employed engineering descent im- agers). Initial data downlinked after the landing fo- Fig 1: Portion of mosaic of MARDI EDL images. cused on rover health and Entry-Descent-Landing MARDI imaged the landing site and science target (EDL) performance. Front and rear Hazcam images regions in color. were also downloaded, along with a number of When is localization done? MARDI thumbnail images. The Hazcam images were After each drive for which Navcam stereo da- used primarily to determine the rover’s orientation by ta has been acquired post-drive and terrain meshes triangulation to the horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars Science Laboratory (Msl) Navigation Cameras (Navcams)
    42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011) 2738.pdf THE MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY (MSL) NAVIGATION CAMERAS (NAVCAMS). J. N. Maki1, D. Thiessen1, A.Pourangi1, P. Kobzeff1, L. Scherr1, T. Elliott1, A. Dingizian1, Beverly St. Ange1, 1Jet Propulsion La- boratory/California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109. Introduction: The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) The camera plate, which also holds the Mastcam and Rover (scheduled for launch in November/December Chemcam instruments, is mounted to a 0.85-meter 2011) will fly four Navigation Cameras (Navcams). high Remote Sensing Mast (RSM), which points the The key requirements of the Navcam imaging system cameras in the azimuth and elevation directions. The are: 1) provide terrain context for traverse planning RSM is attached to the rover deck, which is 1.1 meters and Mastcam/Chemcam pointing, 2) provide a 360- above the nominal surface. The resultant configura- degree field of regard at <1 mrad/pixel angular resolu- tion places the Navcams 1.9 meters above the Martian tion, 3) provide stereo ranging data out to 100 m, and surface (0.4 meters higher than the MER Navcams). 4) use of a broadband, visible filter. The Navcams The MSL Navcams are build-to-print copies were built at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasade- of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) cameras, which na, CA. are described in detail in [1]. The main difference Instrument Details: The mounting locations of the between the MER and MSL cameras is that the MSL Navcams are shown in figure 1. Navcams have slightly more powerful heaters to allow operation at colder ambient temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Mission Insights on the Interior of Mars Suzanne E
    Pre-mission InSights on the Interior of Mars Suzanne E. Smrekar, Philippe Lognonné, Tilman Spohn, W. Bruce Banerdt, Doris Breuer, Ulrich Christensen, Véronique Dehant, Mélanie Drilleau, William Folkner, Nobuaki Fuji, et al. To cite this version: Suzanne E. Smrekar, Philippe Lognonné, Tilman Spohn, W. Bruce Banerdt, Doris Breuer, et al.. Pre-mission InSights on the Interior of Mars. Space Science Reviews, Springer Verlag, 2019, 215 (1), pp.1-72. 10.1007/s11214-018-0563-9. hal-01990798 HAL Id: hal-01990798 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01990798 Submitted on 23 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the wor of some Toulouse researchers and ma es it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author's version published in: https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/21690 Official URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0563-9 To cite this version : Smrekar, Suzanne E. and Lognonné, Philippe and Spohn, Tilman ,... [et al.]. Pre-mission InSights on the Interior of Mars. (2019) Space Science Reviews, 215 (1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Resolution 3D Reconstruction Tool: Exemplar Using MSL Navcam PDS and Mastcam PIO Imagery
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 8, EPSC2013-584-3, 2013 European Planetary Science Congress 2013 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2013 A Multi-resolution 3D Reconstruction Tool: Exemplar using MSL NavCam PDS and MastCam PIO imagery Y. Tao, J.-P. Muller Imaging Group, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Dept. of Space and Climate Physics, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH56NT, UK ([email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract Based on the development work done during the PRoVisG project, we have extended our wide The acquisition of multi-resolution ground level baseline stereo reconstruction tool to be able to imaging data from different cameras onboard the produce multi-resolution 3D products via co- NASA MSL Curiosity, such as the Hazcams, registration of images from different cameras. In this Navcams, Mastcam and MAHLI, enable us to study a paper, we demonstrate this data fusion capability particular area/objects at various levels of detail. using the publicly released NavCam stereo PDS data However, to analyze the structural differences to provide 3D terrain context and co-registered properly or to do any extensive classification and MastCam images from the NASA Public Information recognition requires 3D information as well as the Office (PIO) website in order to reconstruct a high- 2D data from all of these cameras. This requires 3D resolution 3D colour model. reconstruction and co-registration of stereo rover and non-stereo rover imagery. 2. Methods In this paper, we describe the operation of a stereo We initially use the CAHVOR camera model stored reconstruction tool (StRec) with examples on 3D in the PDS header for intra-stereo reconstruction and ground reconstruction from both stereo and non- inter-stereo network building.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars Science Laboratory Engineering Cameras
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-012-9882-4 The Mars Science Laboratory Engineering Cameras J. Maki · D. Thiessen · A. Pourangi · P. Kobzeff · T. Litwin · L. Scherr · S. Elliott · A. Dingizian · M. Maimone Received: 21 December 2011 / Accepted: 5 April 2012 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover is equipped with a set of 12 en- gineering cameras. These cameras are build-to-print copies of the Mars Exploration Rover cameras described in Maki et al. (J. Geophys. Res. 108(E12): 8071, 2003). Images returned from the engineering cameras will be used to navigate the rover on the Martian surface, de- ploy the rover robotic arm, and ingest samples into the rover sample processing system. The Navigation cameras (Navcams) are mounted to a pan/tilt mast and have a 45-degree square field of view (FOV) with a pixel scale of 0.82 mrad/pixel. The Hazard Avoidance Cameras (Hazcams) are body-mounted to the rover chassis in the front and rear of the vehicle and have a 124-degree square FOV with a pixel scale of 2.1 mrad/pixel. All of the cameras uti- lize a 1024 × 1024 pixel detector and red/near IR bandpass filters centered at 650 nm. The MSL engineering cameras are grouped into two sets of six: one set of cameras is connected to rover computer “A” and the other set is connected to rover computer “B”. The Navcams and Front Hazcams each provide similar views from either computer. The Rear Hazcams provide different views from the two computers due to the different mounting locations of the “A” and “B” Rear Hazcams.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Sub-Surface Ionising Radiation: Abstract Introduction ∗ Biosignatures and Geology Conclusions References Tables Figures L
    Biogeosciences Discuss., 4, 455–492, 2007 Biogeosciences www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/4/455/2007/ Discussions BGD © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed 4, 455–492, 2007 under a Creative Commons License. Biogeosciences Discussions is the access reviewed discussion forum of Biogeosciences Martian radiation L. R. Dartnell et al Title Page Martian sub-surface ionising radiation: Abstract Introduction ∗ biosignatures and geology Conclusions References Tables Figures L. R. Dartnell1, L. Desorgher2, J. M. Ward3, and A. J. Coates4 1CoMPLEX (Centre for Mathematics & Physics in the Life Sciences and Experimental J I Biology), University College London, UK J I 2Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern, Switzerland 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, UK Back Close 4Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, UK Full Screen / Esc Received: 8 January 2007 – Accepted: 7 February 2007 – Published: 9 February 2007 Correspondence to: L. R. Dartnell ([email protected]) Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion EGU ∗Invited contribution by L. R. Dartnell, one of the Union Young Scientist Award winners 2006. 455 Abstract BGD The surface of Mars, unshielded by thick atmosphere or global magnetic field, is ex- posed to high levels of cosmic radiation. This ionizing radiation field is deleterious to 4, 455–492, 2007 the survival of dormant cells or spores and the persistence of molecular biomarkers in 5 the subsurface, and so its characterisation is of prime astrobiological interest. Previous Martian radiation research has attempted to address the question of biomarker persistence by inappro- priately using dose profiles weighted specifically for cellular survival. Here, we present L. R. Dartnell et al modelling results of the unmodified physically absorbed radiation dose as a function of depth through the Martian subsurface.
    [Show full text]
  • High Concentrations of Manganese and Sulfur in Deposits on Murray Ridge, Endeavour Crater, Marsk
    American Mineralogist, Volume 101, pages 1389–1405, 2016 High concentrations of manganese and sulfur in deposits on Murray Ridge, Endeavour Crater, Marsk RAYMOND E. ARVIDSON1,*, STEVEN W. SQUYreS2, RICHARD V. MOrrIS3, ANDrew H. KNOLL4, RALF GELLerT5, BENTON C. CLArk6, JEFFreY G. CATALANO1, BRAD L. JOLLIFF1, SCOTT M. MCLENNAN7, KENNETH E. HerkeNHOFF8, SCOTT VANBOMMEL5, DAVID W. MITTLEFEHLDT3, JOHN P. GROTZINger9, EDWARD A. GUINNESS1, JEFFreY R. JOHNSON10, JAMES F. BELL III11, WILLIAM H. FArrAND6, NATHAN STEIN1, VALerIE K. FOX1, MATTHew P. GOLOMbek12, MArgAreT A.G. HINKLE1, WENDY M. CALVIN13, AND PAULO A. DE SOUZA JR.14 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, U.S.A. 2Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, U.S.A. 3Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058, U.S.A. 4Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A. 5Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada 6Space Science Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80301, U.S.A. 7Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, U.S.A. 8U.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, U.S.A. 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, U.S.A. 10Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland 20723, U.S.A. 11School of Earth & Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, U.S.A. 12California Institute of Technology/Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91011 13Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89503, U.S.A. 14CSIRO Digital Productivity Flagship, Hobart, Tasmania 7004, Australia ABSTRACT Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE images and Opportunity rover observations of the ~22 km wide Noachian age Endeavour Crater on Mars show that the rim and surrounding terrains were densely fractured during the impact crater-forming event.
    [Show full text]
  • Wide Crater in Older Meridiani Planum, Mars
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 15, EPSC2021-143, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2021-143 Europlanet Science Congress 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Mineralogical and Geomorphological Characterisation of a 20-km- wide Crater in Older Meridiani Planum, Mars Beatrice Baschetti1,2, Francesca Altieri2, Cristian Carli2, Alessandro Frigeri2, and Maria Sgavetti3 1Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, p.le Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy ([email protected]) 2INAF/IAPS, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy 3Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Università degli Studi di Parma, Viale delle Scienze 157/A, 43121 Parma Introduction: Meridiani Planum is a relatively plain area located at the Martian equator, south of Arabia Terra, approximately ranging from longitude 350°E to 10°E. Heavily cratered Noachian-aged terrains constitute the oldest geological unit in the region, where several channels and valley networks have left their imprint on the surface [1]. A series of younger terrains were then emplaced in some areas, likely during Late Noachian/Early Hesperian epochs [2]. Meridiani Planum shows signs of a diversified and complex history of aqueous activity in many locations. In addition to the evidence provided by the numerous valley networks, data from OMEGA and CRISM orbital spectrometers have revealed the presence of Fe/Mg phyllosilicates and sulfates throughout the area [3]. These hydrated minerals usually form by alteration in aqueous environments. Older, Noachian-aged, areas are generally characterized by the presence of Fe/Mg phyllosilicates, while younger capping units may display both phyllosilicates and sulfates.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Analysis of Martian Rover-Derived Digital Outcrop Models 2 Using the 3D Visualisation Tool, Planetary Robotics 3D Viewer – Pro3d
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repository Confidential manuscript submitted to Planetary Mapping: Methods, Tools for Scientific Analysis and Exploration (JGR Planets/Earth and Space Science Special Issue) 1 Geological analysis of Martian rover-derived Digital Outcrop Models 2 using the 3D visualisation tool, Planetary Robotics 3D Viewer – PRo3D. 3 4 Robert Barnes1, Sanjeev Gupta1, Christoph Traxler2, Thomas Ortner2, Arnold Bauer3, 5 Gerd Hesina2, Gerhard Paar3, Ben Huber3†, Kathrin Juhart3, Laura Fritz2, Bernhard 6 Nauschnegg3, Jan-Peter Muller4, Yu Tao4. 7 1Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, 8 UK. 9 2VRVis Zentrum für Virtual Reality und Visualisierung Forschungs-GmbH, Donau-City- 10 Strasse 11, 1220, Vienna, Austria. 11 3Joanneum Research, Steyregasse 17, 8010, Graz, Austria. 12 4Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury Hill Rd, Dorking 13 RH5 6NT, UK. 14 †Presently at ETH Zürich. 15 16 Corresponding author: Robert Barnes ([email protected]) 17 18 Key Points: 19 • Processing of images from stereo-cameras on Mars rovers produces 3D Digital 20 Outcrop Models (DOMs) which are rendered and analysed in PRo3D. 21 • PRo3D enables efficient, real-time rendering and geological analysis of the DOMs, 22 allowing extraction of large amounts of quantitative data. 23 • Methodologies for sedimentological and structural DOM analyses in PRo3D are 24 presented at four localities along the MSL and MER traverses. 1 Confidential manuscript submitted to Planetary Mapping: Methods, Tools for Scientific Analysis and Exploration (JGR Planets/Earth and Space Science Special Issue) 25 Abstract 26 Panoramic camera systems on robots exploring the surface of Mars are used to collect images 27 of terrain and rock outcrops which they encounter along their traverse.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Mars Rover Traverses
    Simulations of Mars Rover Traverses •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Feng Zhou, Raymond E. Arvidson, and Keith Bennett Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Brian Trease, Randel Lindemann, and Paolo Bellutta California Institute of Technology/Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91011 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Karl Iagnemma and Carmine Senatore Robotic Mobility GroupMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received 7 December 2012; accepted 21 August 2013 Artemis (Adams-based Rover Terramechanics and Mobility Interaction Simulator) is a software tool developed to simulate rigid-wheel planetary rover traverses across natural terrain surfaces. It is based on mechanically realistic rover models and the use of classical terramechanics expressions to model spatially variable wheel-soil and wheel-bedrock properties. Artemis’s capabilities and limitations for the Mars Exploration Rovers (Spirit and Opportunity) were explored using single-wheel laboratory-based tests, rover field tests at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Mars Yard, and tests on bedrock and dune sand surfaces in the Mojave Desert. Artemis was then used to provide physical insight into the high soil sinkage and slippage encountered by Opportunity while crossing an aeolian ripple on the Meridiani plains and high motor currents encountered while driving on a tilted bedrock surface at Cape York on the rim of Endeavour Crater. Artemis will continue to evolve and is intended to be used on a continuing basis as a tool to help evaluate mobility issues over candidate Opportunity and the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover drive paths, in addition to retrieval of terrain properties by the iterative registration of model and actual drive results.
    [Show full text]