DOCSLIB.ORG

MAHLI): Characterization and Calibration Status

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MAHLI): Characterization and Calibration Status Curiosity’s robotic arm-mounted Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI): Characterization and calibration status Kenneth S. Edgett, Michael A. Caplinger, Justin N. Maki, Michael A. Ravine, F. Tony Ghaemi, Sean McNair, Kenneth E. Herkenhoff, Brian M. Duston, Reg G. Willson, R. Aileen Yingst, Megan R. Kennedy, Michelle E. Minitti, Aaron J. Sengstacken, Kimberley D. Supulver, Leslie J. Lipkaman, Gillian M. Krezoski, Marie J. McBride, Tessa L. Jones, Brian E. Nixon, Jason K. Van Beek, Daniel J. Krysak, and Randolph L. Kirk MSL MAHLI Technical Report 0001, version 2 version 1: 19 June 2015; version 2: 05 October 2015 Citation: Edgett, K. S., M. A. Caplinger, J. N. Maki, M. A. Ravine, F. T. Ghaemi, S. McNair, K. E. Herkenhoff, B. M. Duston, R. G. Willson, R. A. Yingst, M. R. Kennedy, M. E. Minitti, A. J. Sengstacken, K. D. Supulver, L. J. Lipkaman, G. M. Krezoski, M. J. McBride, T. L. Jones, B. E. Nixon, J. K. Van Beek, D. J. Krysak, and R. L. Kirk (2015) Curiosity’s robotic arm-mounted Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI): Characterization and calibration status, MSL MAHLI Technical Report 0001 (version 1: 19 June 2015; version 2: 05 October 2015). doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3798.5447 – MSL MAHLI Tech. Rept. 0001 – Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) Technical Report 0001 Cover photo Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover Curiosity’s Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI; center) and Dust Removal Tool (DRT; right), as observed by the Mastcam-34 camera on Sol 30 (06 September 2012) in northern Gale crater, Mars. This is a portion of Mastcam image 0030ML0000400000100851E01. Author affiliations Michael A. Caplinger, Brian M. Duston, Kenneth S. Edgett, Tessa L. Jones1, Megan R. Kennedy, Gillian M. Krezoski, Daniel J. Krysak, Leslie J. Lipkaman, Marie J. McBride, Sean McNair, Brian E. Nixon, Michael A. Ravine, Kimberley D. Supulver, Jason K. Van Beek Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, California, USA Justin N. Maki, Aaron J. Sengstacken2, Reg G. Willson Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA F. Tony Ghaemi Ghaemi Optical Engineering, San Diego, California, USA Kenneth E. Herkenhoff, Randolph L. Kirk U.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Michelle E. Minitti, R. Aileen Yingst Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA 1now at: Cymer, San Diego, California, USA 2now at: Garmin International, Olathe, Kansas, USA Change Log • Version 2, 05 October 2015 – Equation 2 was incorrect; changed 3.4201 to 3.5201. – 2 – – MSL MAHLI Tech. Rept. 0001 – Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 7 2 Mission and MAHLI overview ................................................................................. 7 2.1 MSL mission ................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 MAHLI instrument and investigation ............................................................................ 8 3 Approach and timeline ............................................................................................ 9 3.1 Data availability .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Conventions and definitions ....................................................................................... 10 3.2.1 Time .......................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.2 MSL science and engineering tools and instruments ............................................... 10 3.2.3 Distance and range .................................................................................................. 10 3.2.4 Terms relating to grain size ...................................................................................... 11 3.2.5 Image identification ................................................................................................... 11 3.2.6 Parent and child images ........................................................................................... 11 3.2.7 Color interpolation .................................................................................................... 12 3.2.8 Compand and decompand ....................................................................................... 12 3.3 Instrument characterization and calibration approach ............................................. 12 3.4 Timeline ......................................................................................................................... 14 3.5 Impact of dust coatings ............................................................................................... 17 3.5.1 MAHLI dust cover ..................................................................................................... 17 3.5.2 MAHLI calibration target ........................................................................................... 17 4 Image range and scale characterization .............................................................. 19 4.1 Optomechanical system characteristics .................................................................... 21 4.1.1 Stepper motor actions and motor count ................................................................... 21 4.1.2 Stepper motor count reportage ................................................................................. 21 4.1.3 Dust cover motion ..................................................................................................... 22 4.1.4 Lens focus ................................................................................................................ 22 4.1.5 Stepper motor and focus repeatability ...................................................................... 23 4.2 Relation between focus, motor count, working distance and image scale ............ 23 4.2.1 Pixel scale and image scale ..................................................................................... 23 4.2.2 Minimum working distance ....................................................................................... 24 4.2.3 Dust cover open, infinity focus position .................................................................... 25 4.2.4 Dust cover open, motor count relation to working distance ...................................... 27 4.2.5 Dust cover closed, motor count relation to working distance ................................... 29 4.3 Image resolution and contrast .................................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Lens MTF ................................................................................................................. 31 4.3.2 System MTF ............................................................................................................. 31 4.3.3 Assessment of resolution from Mars data ................................................................ 33 4.4 Depth of field ................................................................................................................. 36 4.5 Scale of features observed in MAHLI images ............................................................ 37 4.5.1 Scale from objects of known size or features at known distance ............................. 37 4.5.2 Range and scale from motor count and nested imaging .......................................... 38 5 Camera head positioning and stability characterization ................................... 40 5.1 Pre-launch tests regarding camera motion during image acquisition .................... 40 5.2 Motion damping before image acquisition ................................................................ 41 – 3 – – MSL MAHLI Tech. Rept. 0001 – 5.2.1 Duration determined before launch and best practice for Mars operation ................ 41 5.2.2 Duration determined on Mars for wheel inspection imaging ..................................... 41 5.3 Camera motion during image acquisition as observed on Mars ............................. 42 5.4 Camera head positioning and repeatability ............................................................... 43 5.5 Imaging with incremental turret rotation .................................................................... 44 6 Onboard image products characterization .......................................................... 46 6.1 Data compression and color interpolation ................................................................ 46 6.2 Product type identification, creation, and receipt on Earth ..................................... 47 6.3 Onboard focus merge product creation and assessment ........................................ 47 6.3.1 Capability and options .............................................................................................. 47 6.3.2 Focus stack acquisition and reporting ...................................................................... 48 6.3.3 Focus merge product reportage and traceability ...................................................... 50 6.3.4 Range information in range map products ............................................................... 51 6.3.5 Merge options characterization ................................................................................ 52 6.3.6 Individual focus stack images received on Earth .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rock Abrasion Record at Gale Crater: Mars Science Laboratory
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE The rock abrasion record at Gale Crater: Mars 10.1002/2013JE004579 Science Laboratory results from Bradbury Special Section: Landing to Rocknest Results from the first 360 Sols of the Mars Science Laboratory N. T. Bridges1, F. J. Calef2, B. Hallet3, K. E. Herkenhoff4, N. L. Lanza5, S. Le Mouélic6, C. E. Newman7, Mission: Bradbury Landing D. L. Blaney2,M.A.dePablo8,G.A.Kocurek9, Y. Langevin10,K.W.Lewis11, N. Mangold6, through Yellowknife Bay S. Maurice12, P.-Y. Meslin12,P.Pinet12,N.O.Renno13,M.S.Rice14, M. E. Richardson7,V.Sautter15, R. S. Sletten3,R.C.Wiens6, and R. A. Yingst16 Key Points: • Ventifacts in Gale Crater 1Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA, 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA, 3Department • Maybeformedbypaleowind of Earth and Space Sciences, College of the Environments, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 4U.S. • Can see abrasion textures at range 5 6 of scales Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, LPGNantes, UMR 6112, CNRS/Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 7Ashima Research, Pasadena, California, USA, 8Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain, 9Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Supporting Information: Austin, Texas, USA, 10Institute d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France, 11Department of • Figure S1 12 fi • Figure S2 Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, Centre National de la Recherche Scienti que, Institut 13 • Table S1 de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, CNRS-Université Toulouse, Toulouse, France, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Science; College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, Correspondence to: 14Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 15Lab N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Variations in Yellowknife Bay Formation Sedimentary Rocks
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Chemical variations in Yellowknife Bay formation 10.1002/2014JE004681 sedimentary rocks analyzed by ChemCam Special Section: on board the Curiosity rover on Mars Results from the first 360 Sols of the Mars Science Laboratory N. Mangold1, O. Forni2, G. Dromart3, K. Stack4, R. C. Wiens5, O. Gasnault2, D. Y. Sumner6, M. Nachon1, Mission: Bradbury Landing P.-Y. Meslin2, R. B. Anderson7, B. Barraclough4, J. F. Bell III8, G. Berger2, D. L. Blaney9, J. C. Bridges10, through Yellowknife Bay F. Calef9, B. Clark11, S. M. Clegg5, A. Cousin5, L. Edgar8, K. Edgett12, B. Ehlmann4, C. Fabre13, M. Fisk14, J. Grotzinger4, S. Gupta15, K. E. Herkenhoff7, J. Hurowitz16, J. R. Johnson17, L. C. Kah18, N. Lanza19, Key Points: 2 1 20 21 12 16 2 • J. Lasue , S. Le Mouélic , R. Léveillé , E. Lewin , M. Malin , S. McLennan , S. Maurice , Fluvial sandstones analyzed by 22 22 23 19 19 24 25 ChemCam display subtle chemical N. Melikechi , A. Mezzacappa , R. Milliken , H. Newsom , A. Ollila , S. K. Rowland , V. Sautter , variations M. Schmidt26, S. Schröder2,C.d’Uston2, D. Vaniman27, and R. Williams27 • Combined analysis of chemistry and texture highlights the role of 1Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique de Nantes, CNRS, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 2Institut de Recherche diagenesis en Astrophysique et Planétologie, CNRS/Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, Toulouse, France, 3Laboratoire de Géologie de • Distinct chemistry in upper layers 4 5 suggests distinct setting and/or Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, Los Alamos National 6 source Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA, 7Astrogeology Science Center, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C
    51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2020) 2663.pdf THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C. M. McKinney1, R. G. Willson1, R. G. Sellar1, D. S. Copley-Woods1, M. Valvo1, T. Goodsall1, J. McGuire1, K. Singh1, T. E. Litwin1, R. G. Deen1, A. Cul- ver1, N. Ruoff1, D. Petrizzo1, 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, [email protected]). Introduction: The Mars 2020 Rover is equipped pairs (the Cachecam, a monoscopic camera, is an ex- with a neXt-generation engineering camera imaging ception). The Mars 2020 engineering cameras are system that represents a significant upgrade over the packaged into a single, compact camera head (see fig- previous Navcam/Hazcam cameras flown on MER and ure 1). MSL [1,2]. The Mars 2020 engineering cameras ac- quire color images with wider fields of view and high- er angular/spatial resolution than previous rover engi- neering cameras. Additionally, the Mars 2020 rover will carry a new camera type dedicated to sample op- erations: the Cachecam. History: The previous generation of Navcams and Hazcams, known collectively as the engineering cam- eras, were designed in the early 2000s as part of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) program. A total of Figure 1. Flight Navcam (left), Flight Hazcam (middle), 36 individual MER-style cameras have flown to Mars and flight Cachecam (right). The Cachecam optical assem- on five separate NASA spacecraft (3 rovers and 2 bly includes an illuminator and fold mirror. landers) [1-6]. The MER/MSL cameras were built in two separate production runs: the original MER run Each of the Mars 2020 engineering cameras utilize a (2003) and a second, build-to-print run for the Mars 20 megapixel OnSemi (CMOSIS) CMOS sensor Science Laboratory (MSL) mission in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation and Performance of the Mars Exploration Rover Imaging System on the Martian Surface
    Operation and Performance of the Mars Exploration Rover Imaging System on the Martian Surface Justin N. Maki Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA USA [email protected] Todd Litwin, Mark Schwochert Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA USA Ken Herkenhoff United States Geological Survey Flagstaff, AZ USA Abstract - The Imaging System on the Mars Exploration Rovers has successfully operated on the surface of Mars for over one Earth year. The acquisition of hundreds of panoramas and tens of thousands of stereo pairs has enabled the rovers to explore Mars at a level of detail unprecedented in the history of space exploration. In addition to providing scientific value, the images also play a key role in the daily tactical operation of the rovers. The mobile nature of the MER surface mission requires extensive use of the imaging system for traverse planning, rover localization, remote sensing instrument targeting, and robotic arm placement. Each of these activity types requires a different set of data compression rates, surface Figure 1. The Mars Exploration Spirit Rover, as viewed by coverage, and image acquisition strategies. An overview the Navcam shortly after lander egress early in the mission. of the surface imaging activities is provided, along with a presents an overview of the operation and performance of summary of the image data acquired to date. the MER Imaging System. Keywords: Imaging system, cameras, rovers, Mars, 1.2 Imaging System Design operations. The MER cameras are classified into five types: Descent cameras, Navigation cameras (Navcam), Hazard Avoidance 1 Introduction cameras (Hazcam), Panoramic cameras (Pancam), and Microscopic Imager (MI) cameras.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Science Laboratory: Curiosity Rover Curiosity’S Mission: Was Mars Ever Habitable? Acquires Rock, Soil, and Air Samples for Onboard Analysis
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mars Science Laboratory: Curiosity Rover www.nasa.gov Curiosity’s Mission: Was Mars Ever Habitable? acquires rock, soil, and air samples for onboard analysis. Quick Facts Curiosity is about the size of a small car and about as Part of NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission, Launch — Nov. 26, 2011 from Cape Canaveral, tall as a basketball player. Its large size allows the rover Curiosity is the largest and most capable rover ever Florida, on an Atlas V-541 to carry an advanced kit of 10 science instruments. sent to Mars. Curiosity’s mission is to answer the Arrival — Aug. 6, 2012 (UTC) Among Curiosity’s tools are 17 cameras, a laser to question: did Mars ever have the right environmental Prime Mission — One Mars year, or about 687 Earth zap rocks, and a drill to collect rock samples. These all conditions to support small life forms called microbes? days (~98 weeks) help in the hunt for special rocks that formed in water Taking the next steps to understand Mars as a possible and/or have signs of organics. The rover also has Main Objectives place for life, Curiosity builds on an earlier “follow the three communications antennas. • Search for organics and determine if this area of Mars was water” strategy that guided Mars missions in NASA’s ever habitable for microbial life Mars Exploration Program. Besides looking for signs of • Characterize the chemical and mineral composition of Ultra-High-Frequency wet climate conditions and for rocks and minerals that ChemCam Antenna rocks and soil formed in water, Curiosity also seeks signs of carbon- Mastcam MMRTG • Study the role of water and changes in the Martian climate over time based molecules called organics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pancam Instrument for the Exomars Rover
    ASTROBIOLOGY ExoMars Rover Mission Volume 17, Numbers 6 and 7, 2017 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2016.1548 The PanCam Instrument for the ExoMars Rover A.J. Coates,1,2 R. Jaumann,3 A.D. Griffiths,1,2 C.E. Leff,1,2 N. Schmitz,3 J.-L. Josset,4 G. Paar,5 M. Gunn,6 E. Hauber,3 C.R. Cousins,7 R.E. Cross,6 P. Grindrod,2,8 J.C. Bridges,9 M. Balme,10 S. Gupta,11 I.A. Crawford,2,8 P. Irwin,12 R. Stabbins,1,2 D. Tirsch,3 J.L. Vago,13 T. Theodorou,1,2 M. Caballo-Perucha,5 G.R. Osinski,14 and the PanCam Team Abstract The scientific objectives of the ExoMars rover are designed to answer several key questions in the search for life on Mars. In particular, the unique subsurface drill will address some of these, such as the possible existence and stability of subsurface organics. PanCam will establish the surface geological and morphological context for the mission, working in collaboration with other context instruments. Here, we describe the PanCam scientific objectives in geology, atmospheric science, and 3-D vision. We discuss the design of PanCam, which includes a stereo pair of Wide Angle Cameras (WACs), each of which has an 11-position filter wheel and a High Resolution Camera (HRC) for high-resolution investigations of rock texture at a distance. The cameras and electronics are housed in an optical bench that provides the mechanical interface to the rover mast and a planetary protection barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Curiosity in Gale Crater, and Other Landed Mars Missions
    44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2013) 2534.pdf LOCALIZATION AND ‘CONTEXTUALIZATION’ OF CURIOSITY IN GALE CRATER, AND OTHER LANDED MARS MISSIONS. T. J. Parker1, M. C. Malin2, F. J. Calef1, R. G. Deen1, H. E. Gengl1, M. P. Golombek1, J. R. Hall1, O. Pariser1, M. Powell1, R. S. Sletten3, and the MSL Science Team. 1Jet Propulsion Labora- tory, California Inst of Technology ([email protected]), 2Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, CA ([email protected] ), 3University of Washington, Seattle. Introduction: Localization is a process by which tactical updates are made to a mobile lander’s position on a planetary surface, and is used to aid in traverse and science investigation planning and very high- resolution map compilation. “Contextualization” is hereby defined as placement of localization infor- mation into a local, regional, and global context, by accurately localizing a landed vehicle, then placing the data acquired by that lander into context with orbiter data so that its geologic context can be better charac- terized and understood. Curiosity Landing Site Localization: The Curi- osity landing was the first Mars mission to benefit from the selection of a science-driven descent camera (both MER rovers employed engineering descent im- agers). Initial data downlinked after the landing fo- Fig 1: Portion of mosaic of MARDI EDL images. cused on rover health and Entry-Descent-Landing MARDI imaged the landing site and science target (EDL) performance. Front and rear Hazcam images regions in color. were also downloaded, along with a number of When is localization done? MARDI thumbnail images. The Hazcam images were After each drive for which Navcam stereo da- used primarily to determine the rover’s orientation by ta has been acquired post-drive and terrain meshes triangulation to the horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining Mineralogy on Mars with the Chemin X-Ray Diffractometer the Chemin Team Logo Illustrating the Diffraction of Minerals on Mars
    Determining Mineralogy on Mars with the CheMin X-Ray Diffractometer The CheMin team logo illustrating the diffraction of minerals on Mars. Robert T. Downs1 and the MSL Science Team 1811-5209/15/0011-0045$2.50 DOI: 10.2113/gselements.11.1.45 he rover Curiosity is conducting X-ray diffraction experiments on the The mineralogy of the Martian surface of Mars using the CheMin instrument. The analyses enable surface is dominated by the phases found in basalt and its ubiquitous Tidentifi cation of the major and minor minerals, providing insight into weathering products. To date, the the conditions under which the samples were formed or altered and, in turn, major basaltic minerals identi- into past habitable environments on Mars. The CheMin instrument was devel- fied by CheMin include Mg– Fe-olivines, Mg–Fe–Ca-pyroxenes, oped over a twenty-year period, mainly through the efforts of scientists and and Na–Ca–K-feldspars, while engineers from NASA and DOE. Results from the fi rst four experiments, at the minor primary minerals include Rocknest, John Klein, Cumberland, and Windjana sites, have been received magnetite and ilmenite. CheMin and interpreted. The observed mineral assemblages are consistent with an also identifi ed secondary minerals formed during alteration of the environment hospitable to Earth-like life, if it existed on Mars. basalts, such as calcium sulfates KEYWORDS: X-ray diffraction, Mars, Gale Crater, habitable environment, CheMin, (anhydrite and bassanite), iron Curiosity rover oxides (hematite and akaganeite), pyrrhotite, clays, and quartz. These secondary minerals form and INTRODUCTION persist only in limited ranges of temperature, pressure, and The Mars rover Curiosity landed in Gale Crater on August ambient chemical conditions (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars Science Laboratory Engineering Cameras
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-012-9882-4 The Mars Science Laboratory Engineering Cameras J. Maki · D. Thiessen · A. Pourangi · P. Kobzeff · T. Litwin · L. Scherr · S. Elliott · A. Dingizian · M. Maimone Received: 21 December 2011 / Accepted: 5 April 2012 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover is equipped with a set of 12 en- gineering cameras. These cameras are build-to-print copies of the Mars Exploration Rover cameras described in Maki et al. (J. Geophys. Res. 108(E12): 8071, 2003). Images returned from the engineering cameras will be used to navigate the rover on the Martian surface, de- ploy the rover robotic arm, and ingest samples into the rover sample processing system. The Navigation cameras (Navcams) are mounted to a pan/tilt mast and have a 45-degree square field of view (FOV) with a pixel scale of 0.82 mrad/pixel. The Hazard Avoidance Cameras (Hazcams) are body-mounted to the rover chassis in the front and rear of the vehicle and have a 124-degree square FOV with a pixel scale of 2.1 mrad/pixel. All of the cameras uti- lize a 1024 × 1024 pixel detector and red/near IR bandpass filters centered at 650 nm. The MSL engineering cameras are grouped into two sets of six: one set of cameras is connected to rover computer “A” and the other set is connected to rover computer “B”. The Navcams and Front Hazcams each provide similar views from either computer. The Rear Hazcams provide different views from the two computers due to the different mounting locations of the “A” and “B” Rear Hazcams.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Surface Materials by the Curiosity Mars Rover
    INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW Analysis of Surface Materials by the Curiosity Mars Rover THE 6 AUGUST 2012 ARRIVAL OF THE CURIOSITY ROVER ON THE SURFACE and showing that these larger components probably break apart to of Mars delivered the most technically advanced geochemistry labo- form part of the soil. In contrast, the fi ne-grained soil component is ratory ever sent to the surface of another planet. Its 10 instruments mafi c, similar to soils observed by the Pathfi nder and Mars Explora- (1)* were commissioned for operations and were tested on a diverse tion Rover missions. set of materials, including rocks, soils, and the atmosphere, during Curiosity scooped, processed, and analyzed a small deposit of the fi rst 100 martian days (sols) of the mission. The fi ve articles pre- windblown sand/silt/dust at Rocknest that has similar morphology and sented in full in the online edition of Science (www.sciencemag.org/ bulk elemental composition to other aeolian deposits studied at other extra/curiosity), with abstracts in print (pp. 1476–1477), describe the Mars landing sites. Based solely on analysis of CheMin x-ray diffrac- mission’s initial results, in which Curiosity’s full laboratory capabil- tion (XRD) data from Mars, calibrated with terrestrial standards, Bish ity was used. et al. estimate the Rocknest deposit to be composed of ~71% crystal- Curiosity was sent to explore a site located in Gale crater, where line material of basaltic origin, in addition to ~29% x-ray–amorphous a broad diversity of materials was observed from orbit. Materials materials. In an independent approach, Blake et al.
    [Show full text]
  • PSS Mars Oct 08
    Planetary Sciences Subcommittee October 2-3, 2008 Doug McCuistion Director, Mars Exploration Program 2 Memorable Scenes Phoenix Meteorology is Changing from Phoenix Spacecraft thruster expose water-ice in permafrost SSI camera images water- ice particles clouds and Top: Robotic Arm delivers their movement soil+ice dug from trench to the Thermal Evolved Gas Analyzer (TEGA) Bottom: TEGA CELL #0 after receiving ice-bearing sample Phoenix images early morning water- Dust Devil frost. Lasts longer every morning as winter approaches Robotic Arm digs trench and discovers water ice. SSI camera documents H2O SSI camera images multiple sublimation. dust devils TEGA’s mass spectrometer confirms presence of water- ice on Mars. 3 4 Phoenix Meteorology is Changing A White Christmas on Mars? Atmospheric pressure and temperature data have been recorded at the Phoenix landing site every Virga, in the 2 seconds since landing. from of water- snow, has been detected in the atmosphere, getting nearer Dust cloud to the ground approaching daily. Morning wind is up to about 9 mph; enough to rattle the solar arrays but not to damage the spacecraft. 5 6 The End is in Sight Available power (measurement based) WCL Cells Utilized power (modeled) Command Moratorium Command a Conjunction MECA’s Wet Chemistry Lab (WCL) MECA’s Optical Microscope: highest resolution (4 microns/pixel) b discovers perchlorates in soil! optical images delivered from any planetary surface other than earth c AFM Tip Perchlorates: Powerful, but d stable oxidant. Very hydroscopic. Survival heater
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Mars Rover Traverses
    Simulations of Mars Rover Traverses •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Feng Zhou, Raymond E. Arvidson, and Keith Bennett Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Brian Trease, Randel Lindemann, and Paolo Bellutta California Institute of Technology/Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91011 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Karl Iagnemma and Carmine Senatore Robotic Mobility GroupMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received 7 December 2012; accepted 21 August 2013 Artemis (Adams-based Rover Terramechanics and Mobility Interaction Simulator) is a software tool developed to simulate rigid-wheel planetary rover traverses across natural terrain surfaces. It is based on mechanically realistic rover models and the use of classical terramechanics expressions to model spatially variable wheel-soil and wheel-bedrock properties. Artemis’s capabilities and limitations for the Mars Exploration Rovers (Spirit and Opportunity) were explored using single-wheel laboratory-based tests, rover field tests at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Mars Yard, and tests on bedrock and dune sand surfaces in the Mojave Desert. Artemis was then used to provide physical insight into the high soil sinkage and slippage encountered by Opportunity while crossing an aeolian ripple on the Meridiani plains and high motor currents encountered while driving on a tilted bedrock surface at Cape York on the rim of Endeavour Crater. Artemis will continue to evolve and is intended to be used on a continuing basis as a tool to help evaluate mobility issues over candidate Opportunity and the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover drive paths, in addition to retrieval of terrain properties by the iterative registration of model and actual drive results.
    [Show full text]