Pauktaw Township - Rakhine State
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Acknowledgments
FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Acknowledgments Thisresearch study was led by U Kyaw Khine & Associates with the assistance of the field survey team of the FSWG members organizations. The research team would like to express sincere thanks to Dr Ohnmar Khaing (FSWG Coordinator), Dr. Min Ko Ko Maung, (Deputy Coordinator), and Mr. Thijs Wissink (Programme Advisor) for their kind and effective support for the research. The team is especially grateful to Daw Yi Yi Cho (M&E Officer) for providing logistical and technical support along with study design, data collection, analysis, and report writing. Finally, this research would not have been possible without the valuable participation and knowledge imparted by all the respondents from the villages of Pauktaw and Taungup Townships and focus group discussion (FGD) participants. The research team would like to acknowledge the experts and professors from respective institutions concerned with livestock who willingly agreed to take part in the FGDs. We are greatly indebted to them. 1 FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Ensure adequate financial and human resources to village volunteers for veterinary extension services to cover all rural areas Upgrade local pig breeds with improved variety for better genetic performance in rural livestock production Attract private sector investment to finance all livestock support infrastructure, such as cold chain, cold storage, animal feed mills, veterinary drugs, and meat and -
Rakhine State – Nutrition Information Analysis
RAKHINE STATE – NUTRITION INFORMATION ANALYSIS January – December 2014 INTRODUCTION The Rakhine state nutrition response aims to achieve 4 key objectives: Sector objectives 1. To reduce malnutrition-related deaths in girls and boys under-5 by ensuring access to quality life-saving interventions for management of acute malnutrition, guided by global standards; 2. Ensure access to key preventive nutrition services routinely provided by Government; 3. Ensure enhanced monitoring and analysis of nutrition situation, needs, and evolving vulnerabilities; 4. Improve cross sector and actor collaboration to address underlying factors of malnutrition. This report addresses the first and second objectives for which the sector is able to obtain information regularly though the Nutrition Information Systems (NIS) and monitor indicators on a monthly basis; Outcome level indicators 1. Percentage of girls and boys CURED of acute malnutrition 2. Percentage of girls and boys with acute malnutrition who DIED 3. Percentage of children under 5 years provided with vitamin A and deworming treatment routinely provided by government 4. Percentage of affected women provided with skilled breastfeeding counselling Activities Active and passive screening of children 6-59 months for acute malnutrition Treatment of severe and moderate acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months through provision of ready-to-use therapeutic or supplementary food, routine medicines, medical consultation and counselling for cases of severe acute malnutrition with infant and young child feeding support Micronutrient prevention and control (children/ PLW) Vitamin A supplementation and deworming Blanket supplementary feeding (children/ PLW) Organizations involved in response DoH, ACF, MHAA, SCI, UNICEF, WFP, MNMA Rakhine State nutrition information December 2014 1 1. -
Climate Risk Assessment for Fisheries and Aquaculture Based Adaptation in Myanmar
######################################################### Climate risk assessment for fisheries and aquaculture based adaptation in Myanmar Prepared By: Mark Dubois, Kimio Leemans, Michael Akester, Shwu Jiau Teoh, Bethany Smith, Hsu Mon Aung, Tinzar Win Pyae Kyaw, May Hsu Mon Soe & KuMuDara Win Maung Table of Content Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 Fisheries in Myanmar: A Brief Overview ............................................................................................ 1 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................................. 2 Overview of the Climate Based Risk Assessment Within Myanmar ................................................. 3 Ayeyarwady Region ......................................................................................................................... 5 Yangon Region ................................................................................................................................. 6 Rakhine State ................................................................................................................................... 7 The 2014 IPCC Risk Assessment Framework ...................................................................................... 8 Methodology .........................................................................................................................................12 -
Rakhine State Production Date : 1St July 2015 Mangrove Coverage Evolution in Pauktaw Township 1988-2015
For Humanitarian Purposes Only MYANMAR - Rakhine State Production date : 1st July 2015 Mangrove Coverage Evolution in Pauktaw Township 1988-2015 Thea Hpyu Thar Yar Min Kan San Htoe Chaik Khaung Laung Ywar Haung Kan Bu Kan Chaung Wa Kyan Chaung Kone (Sin Tan Taung Thar Zay Ah Wa Shwe Taik Chan) Pyin Nga Swei Htaunt Nyaung Pin Zin Khin Thar Dar Mrauk-U Taung Taung Moe Tein Lel (Ku Pyun To (Rakhine) Lar Pone) Chin Thea Tan Taik Kan Pyin Pyin Hpet Kya Taung Poet Gyi Thu Htay Khaung Laung Total MangroveThin Coverage for Hin Kha Ei Thei Kone Thu Nge Tway Ma Ywar Thit Pone Tan Yaw Taw Soke Nga Pyi Chay Na Daung Nat Chaung Kin Seik Ah Lel Inn tYarhe Taw Township in 1988 and 2015 (ha) Kya Ywar Haung Ku Lar Ah Lel Chaung Kyauk Pan Zin Htaunt Kywe Cha Gyin Ku Lar Sin Gyi Bar Chaung Ywar Nge Tin Htu Let Wea Seik Maw Chay Ah Me Chaung Pyin Myit Nar Thar Yar Sar Taik Nat Chaung Chay Tat Yar Khin (Rakhine) Pyin Kone Ywar Thit Sin Gyi Ma Gyi Di Par Pyin (MSL) Chaung Thar Si Shwe Zin Daing Yon Ku Lar Myit Nar Thone Pat Mi Kyaung Kone Kyat Pone Chaing Wet Ma Tet Kya Thin Pone Yin Ye Kan Chaung (Middle) Sint Minbya Hpyu Yae Paik Pin Yin Ponnagyun Chaung Dar Khan Ah Wa Son Kyein Zay Ya Htaunt Gan Kya Chaung Bu Pin Kyun Wa Di Bar Bu Taung Nga Wet Gyi Kyun Chaung Taung Yin Yae Hpyu Yin Ye Ohn Hna Leik Taunt Chay Tha Pyay Nga/Wai (Ein Nga Tan Kan Chaung Thein Zee Pin Teit Su Kyun Ah Htoke Kan Thein Kan Shey Min) Pyin Ku Lar Taung Gyi Chay Thei Wet Hnoke Taung Chaung Met Ka Hpar Lar Yar Ah Lel14590 Lar Kya Thee Chaung Let Pan Kone Zee Auk Zee Yae Pauk Se Thone -
Rakhine State, Myanmar
World Food Programme S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 Photographs: ©FAO/F. Del Re/L. Castaldi and ©WFP/K. Swe. This report has been prepared by Monika Tothova and Luigi Castaldi (FAO) and Yvonne Forsen, Marco Principi and Sasha Guyetsky (WFP) under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Mario Zappacosta Siemon Hollema Senior Economist, EST-GIEWS Senior Programme Policy Officer Trade and Markets Division, FAO Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific, WFP E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Global Information and Early Warning System on Food and Agriculture (GIEWS) has set up a mailing list to disseminate its reports. To subscribe, submit the Registration Form on the following link: http://newsletters.fao.org/k/Fao/trade_and_markets_english_giews_world S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. -
Job Announcement Training Officer - One Post Yangon
Job Announcement Training Officer - One Post Yangon The Lutheran World Federation (LWF) Myanmar is an international non-government organization serving the people of Myanmar since 2008 after Cyclone Nargis. Currently LWF is facilitating rights-based empowerment process in 34 villages of Mindat and 20 villages in Matupi Township, Chin State, 29 villages of Kyarinnseikgyi, Pharpun and Hlainbwe Townships in Kayin State and 21 villages in Ann Township, Rakhine State. 36 Women Groups in Pyapon, Dedaye and Twantay Townships are also being supported and accompanied technically for sustainability. LWF is also assisting the IDPs, host communities and nearby villages of Sittwe, Mrauk U, Ponna Kyun and Pauktaw Township in Rakhine State to improve children’s access to education. LWF also works with Camp Management Committees (CMC) of 8 camps in Sittwe and Pauktaw Townships. Mainstreaming community based psychosocial support; gender; environment; fire-safety and protection are integral part of the program. The working approach of LWF is Rights Based Empowerment and Integrated Programmatic Approaches. Livelihoods, Quality Services, Protection and Social Cohesion and Systems and Practices for Quality Programming are four main components of LWF Myanmar. The strategic objectives of LWF are Communities have increased access to livelihoods and income generating opportunities, Communities have improved access to quality basic services (including basic infrastructures: roads, water, sanitation, electricity; education and healthcare) through their active engagement and Right holders, especially women, are empowered in managing their individual, household and village development through accessing their rights and entitlements. Its values and principles such as Dignity, Human Rights and Justice, Compassion and Commitment, Inclusion and Diversity, Meaningful Participation, Transparency and Accountability, Humanitarian Principles, Gender Justice and Climate Change guide the work. -
Myanmar 2014-2016 / Conflict
CONFLICT A.2 / MMYYANMAR 2014-2016 / CONFLICT ASIA - PACIFIC CASE STUDY MYANMAR 2014-2016 / CONFLICT KEYWORDS: Individual housing, Cash assistance, Advocacy, Community participation, Protection CRISIS Inter-communal violence, Rakhine, 2012. TOTAL PEOPLE 145,000 displaced due to 2012 violence AFFECTED (119,560 as of Nov 2016). INDIA KACHIN CHINA PROJECT Rakhine State, Myanmar (Townships of Mrauk-U, LOCATIONS Kyauktaw and Minbya, Rathedaung and Pauktaw). BENEFICIARIES 25,000 individuals (approx.). SAGAING BANGLADESH PROJECT OUTPUTS 4,737 beneficiary-led houses. SHAN SHELTER SIZE1 Min. 16.7 m2 (4.6m x 3.7m basic design). CHIN MANDALAY THE LAO 2 SHELTER DENSITY Min. 3.4 m /person (average 5 members per family). PEOPLE’S RAKHINE MAGWAY DEMO- CRATIC PROJECT COST USD 1,000 (Labour cost = USD 160; Materials, Logis- REPUBLIC PER SHELTER tics, Transport, etc. = USD 840). KAYAH BAY OF BAGO THAILAND OCCUPANCY RATE 100% (estimated). BENGAL PROJECT SUMMARY YANGON AYEYARWADY KAYIN This was a beneficiary-led, cash-based, project that allowed fami- MON lies displaced due to inter-communal violence to vacate their temporary shelter and rebuild their houses. The project enabled the construction of 4,737 houses for a marginalized group in a highly volatile environment, PROJECT AREAS TANINTHARYI where some stakeholders were keen to use a contractor-driven ap- proach. In fact, the more discreet owner-driven methodology, used in 1 Note: families were free to increase the size or modify the this project, proved highly effective. house design according to their needs. JUL 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2 3 4 5 CONFLICT / VIOLENCE PLANNING PHASE 1 PHASE 2 TIMELINE SEP OCT JAN MAR JUL OCT APR 1 Jan 2013: Activation of Shelter Cluster. -
Annex 3 Public Map of Rakhine State
ICC-01/19-7-Anx3 04-07-2019 1/2 RH PT Annex 3 Public Map of Rakhine State (Source: Myanmar Information Management Unit) http://themimu.info/sites/themimu.info/files/documents/State_Map_D istrict_Rakhine_MIMU764v04_23Oct2017_A4.pdf ICC-01/19-7-Anx3 04-07-2019 2/2 RH PT Myanmar Information Management Unit District Map - Rakhine State 92° EBANGLADESH 93° E 94° E 95° E Pauk !( Kyaukhtu INDIA Mindat Pakokku Paletwa CHINA Maungdaw !( Samee Ü Taungpyoletwea Nyaung-U !( Kanpetlet Ngathayouk CHIN STATE Saw Bagan !( Buthidaung !( Maungdaw District 21° N THAILAND 21° N SeikphyuChauk Buthidaung Kyauktaw Kyauktaw Kyaukpadaung Maungdaw Mrauk-U Salin Rathedaung Mrauk-U Minbya Rathedaung Ponnagyun Mrauk-U District Sidoktaya Yenangyaung Minbya Pwintbyu Sittwe DistrictPonnagyun Pauktaw Sittwe Saku !( Minbu Pauktaw .! Ngape .! Sittwe Myebon Ann Magway Myebon 20° N RAKHINE STATE Minhla 20° N Ann MAGWAY REGION Sinbaungwe Kyaukpyu District Kyaukpyu Ma-Ei Kyaukpyu !( Mindon Ramree Toungup Ramree Kamma 19° N 19° N Bay of Bengal Munaung Toungup Munaung Padaung Thandwe District BAGO REGION Thandwe Thandwe Kyangin Legend .! State/Region Capital Main Town !( Other Town Kyeintali !( 18° N Coast Line 18° N Map ID: MIMU764v04 Township Boundary Creation Date: 23 October 2017.A4 State/Region Boundary Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 International Boundary Data Sources: MIMU Gwa Base Map: MIMU Road Boundaries: MIMU/WFP Kyaukpyu Place Name: Ministry of Home Affairs (GAD) Gwa translated by MIMU Maungdaw Mrauk-U Email: [email protected] Website: www.themimu.info Sittwe Ngathaingchaung Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit Kilometers !( Thandwe 2017. May be used free of charge with attribution. 0 15 30 60 Yegyi 92° E 93° E 94° E 95° E Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.. -
Demographic Characteristic S and Road Network on the Spread of Coronavirus Pandemic in Rakhine State
THE IMPACT OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND ROAD NETWORK ON THE SPREAD OF CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC IN RAKHINE STATE: USING GEOSPATIAL TECHNIQUES Mu Mu Than (1), Khin Mar Yee (2), Tin Tin Mya (3), Thida Win (4) 1 Sittway University, Rakhine State, Myanmar 2 Myeik University, Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar 3 Pathein University, Ayeyarwady Region, Myanmar 4 East Yangon University, Yangon Region, Myanmar [email protected] KEY WORDS: connectivity, demographic characteristics, confirmed cases, factor 1. INTRODUCTION analysis, interaction Rakhine State has 5 districts in which 17 ABSTRACT: Demographic characteristics townships and 3sub-townships are included. give communities information for the past, Percentage of urban population is 17%. It has present and future plan and services. more rural nature. Total number of population Demographic data and connectivity of road in Rakhine State is 3,188,807 (2014 Census). It has an area of 36,778.1 Km2. Population network impact how far people travel and 2 what they do. The spread of COVID-19 cases density is 86.7 per km . It faces the Bay of in the state deals with these data. Bengal on the west, Bangladesh in the northwest and the India in the north. In the In the 31st August 2020 COVID-19 east it is bordered by state and regions of the confirmed cases across the state had risen to country (Figure 1). Waterway is important to 350 cases. This is more than that of Yangon the transportation of people and goods in the Region. The researchers are interested in the middle and northern part of the states to reasons for that. -
Hrc/42/Crp.5
A/HRC/42/CRP.5 Distr.: General 16 September 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty-second session 9-27 September 2019 Agenda item 2 Human rights situation that require the Council’s attention Detailed findings of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar* * Information complementary to that contained in the official report (A/HRC/42/50), submitted to the Human Rights Council pursuant to resolution 39/2. Reproduced as received, in the language of submission only. GE. A/HRC/42/CRP.5 Contents Page I. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 II. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8 III. Mandate and follow up the Human Rights Council resolution 39/2 ................................................ 9 A. Interpretation of the Mandate .................................................................................................. 9 B. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 9 C. Legal Framework ..................................................................................................................... 9 1. Economic, social and cultural rights ............................................................................... 10 2. Rules of State responsibility ........................................................................................... -
Rakhine Humanitarian Response February 2013
GBV AoR RRT_Rakhine Humanitarian Response_February 2013 Rapid Assessment Protection situation of Women and Girls --Rakhine Humanitarian Response GBV is a life-threatening protection issue primarily affecting women and children. All humanitarian actors have a responsibility to take action from the earliest stages of an emergency to prevent GBV and provide appropriate assistance to survivors. --IASC Guidelines for Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings, 2005-- 1. Objective The main objective of this rapid assessment is to identify the protection needs of women and girls living in the IDP camps, although it also tried to explore further on protection issues related to men and boys, but due to limitations in time and source of information, it focuses on risks and threats identified and faced by women. The assessment was lead by the GBV AoR Advisor1 on mission to Myanmar, in collaboration with UNFPA, UNHCR and DRC. It is based mainly on information gathered through focus group discussions (FGDs) with IDP women, direct observations from the interviewers, and information collected from key service providers. Due to the available logistical support, the information was collected primarily from the Sittwe, Pauktaw and Myebon camps. A total of 18 FGDs were conducted in 11 locations, including Muslim IDPs, Rakhine IDPs and the Muslim host community2. Other locations will be assessed and further findings will be included in future reports. This report does not provide information on the current prevalence of gender based violence (GBV) in the affected areas, but it assesses risks and threats, and identifies entry points for programming on GBV prevention and response. -
MYANMAR, RAKHINE STATE: COVID-19 Situation Report No
MYANMAR, RAKHINE STATE: COVID-19 Situation Report No. 08 1 September 2020 This report, which focuses on the recent surge in COVID-19 cases in Rakhine, is produced by OCHA Myanmar covering the period of 10 to 31 August, in collaboration with Inter-Cluster Coordination Group and wider humanitarian partners. The next report will be issued on or around 18 September. HIGHLIGHTS • A total of 393 locally transmitted cases have been reported across Rakhine between 16 August and 1 September, bringing to 409 the number of cases in 16 townships since 18 May. Across the country, 887 cases, six fatalities and 354 recoveries have been reported. • The recent surge in local transmission includes COVID-19 positive cases among the personnel of the United Nations agencies and international non-governmental organizations (INGO). • No cases have been reported in camps or sites for internally displaced people (IDPs) as of 31 August, while displaced persons who had been in contact with COVID-19 confirmed cases were placed in quarantine and tested. • Sittwe General Hospital, where most COVID-19 confirmed cases are being treated, remains the primary treatment facility for Rakhine. Efforts to increase treatment capacities continue. • The Rakhine State Government has introduced various COVID-19 measures since 16 August, including a state-wide “stay-at-home” order and other measures aimed at preventing the local transmission. • Humanitarian actors are assessing the impact of the recently introduced COVID-19 measures on operations, including COVID-19 preparedness and response activities. SITUATION OVERVIEW 409 16 393 887 157K Cases in Rakhine Townships Locally transmitted Cases countrywide Total tests conducted countrywide SURGE IN LOCAL TRANSMISSION: Since 16 August, when the Ministry of Health and Sports (MoHS) confirmed a new COVID-19 case in Sittwe - the first case of local transmission reported in almost a month country-wide - the number of locally transmitted cases has continued to increase in Rakhine State.