DOCSLIB.ORG

(Lockwood, 1890).Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Lockwood, 1890).Pdf Napoleon Bonaparte, as First Consul. l>iivid.) ( Flora a Drawing by I.. C. CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF FRANCE. BY HENRY C. LOCKWOOD, 11 AUTHOR OF "ABOLITION OF THE PRESIDENCY, " ETC. SUPPLE MENTEn P. Y FULL AND PRECISE TRANSLATIONS OF THE TEXT OF THE VARIOUS CONSTITUTIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS IN OPERATION AT DIFFERENT TIMES, FROM 1789 TO 1889. Illitstralcd 'mUIi 32 /\>i /rails aiul a Map 0/ Paris. chicago and new york: .Rand, McNally & Company, Publishers 1890. l^ ^0 > ^^ 1/ CorYKiGHT 1889, BY Rand, McNally & Co., Chicago. CONTENTS. I. The REVoi.uTinN and thk First Rept-bmc II n. The Consulate and the First Eiipiiys c; III. The Restoration of Monarchy 1 l.'i IV. The OrleanVst Monarchy V>2 V. The Second RBPrsLic ^., Kiii VI. The Second Empire i.M,- VII. The Third Repvbi.ic .'.':' .;. VIII. cnxcLfsiox .1^.:..?:\ , .\PPENDICES. I. Coiistituti.mof irm .: n. Constitution of 1793 305 in. Constitution of 1795 -n:. lA'. Constitution of 1799. 1.'>I V. Constitutional Cliarttn- of in I J •'id:! VI Ailditional Act of 1815 -ililt VII. Constitutional Charter of 1830 377 VIII. Couslitution of 1S4S. 3S.! IX. Constitution of 1853 307 X. Con.stitutional Laws of 1875 4a3 (5) PREFATORY NOTE. The author of tliis essay has made some attempt briefly to outline the intellectual, social, ami political causes which led to the changes in the form of govern- ment of France, and at the same time to sketch the salient features of her organic law. Parliamentary governments, like that of Great Britain, and presidential systems, similar to that of the United States, have been compared to the parliamentary Repub- lic of P' ranee. Such an extended period of French history has been dealt with that it has only been possible to accord a brief consideration to the many questions of Constitution- alism, which would, under other circumstances, have received a closer analysis than the cursory one which the author has made. However, it was intended to produce a general commentary and criticism, and reference is therefore invited to the Constitutional laws which have been translated and placed in the appendix of this work, in support of the positions assumed. Although the Constitutional life of France lies within the period treated in this essay, still it is true that as early as the time that immediately followed the Middle Ages, society revived and secured popular franchises from the Crown and the nobles. These historic facts disclose the very germs of Constitutional law. In 1302, Philip the Fair summoned the tiers i'tat, being delegates from the towns, to meet the nobles ami prelates (7> VIM PREFATORY NOTE. in Notre-Dame. This meeting constituted tlie first con- vention of the States-general. In 1355 the three estates deliberated together again, and in 1484 the States-general was convoked, in order to ensure a National representa- tion. In Languedoc, Burgundy, Provence, and Brittany, and other provinces, or pays d'etats, the estates retained their ancient Constitutions. Subsequently the parliaments, which possessed legis- lative, political, and administrative, as well as judicial power, were a further check upon the prerogative of the King. The parliaments of Paris and the provincial par- liaments displayed a spirit of independence until they were abolished by Louis XV. Many of these tribunals had already been overcome by Richelieu and Louis XIV. It has been assumed by some publicists that France had a Constitution prior to 1789. The institutions referred to by these writers were largely subject to the relative cruelty or goodness of kings, of ministers, of bishops, and of lords; a mixture of old laws and barbar- ous customs. Maxims of public law and precepts of pri- vate rights marched side by side in the confusion. The contradictory systems with which the earlier part of the eighteenth century was filled, precluded the diffusion of reform principles, responding to the great social needs of that time, and, when placed in the light of the Revo- lution, became the point of departure of the modern law. Many extravagant estimates of the number of Constitu- tions under which the French people have lived since 1789 have been made. This number will be materially reduced when it is remembered that the Constitution of 1793 was suppressed a short time after its adoption, by the revolutionary government; that of 1815 never went into practical operation; that of 1830 was only the char- ter of 1814, with slight amendments; that of 1852 was PREFATORY NOTE. IX substantially a reproduction of the Constitution of the year VIII, and the Constitutional laws which now govern France were never adopted by a constituent assembly. The senahis consultinn of the i6th Thcnnidor, year X, creating the consulship for life; of the 28th Floreal, year XII, making Napoleon I. Emperor; and of August 19, 1807, suppressing the Tribunate, were but modifications of Napoleon's Constitution of 22d Frimaire, year VIII. Napoleon III. governed France for seventeen years by virtue of his Constitution of January 14, 1852, as modified by the senatiis consultiim of November 7, which estab- lished the hereditary empire; of December 25, 1852, which completed the imperial structure; of November 24, i860, which permitted the Senate and Legislative Body to reply by the "Address" to the Crown's message; of January 19, 1867, which acknowledged the right of interpellation; of September 8, 1869, declaring the ministers responsible; and of April 23, 1870, claiming to enact a new Constitu- tion, and to assure the future of the Napoleonic dynasty. The Constitutions which are set forth in the appendix of this book were translated from the text as published in the " Histoire Constitutionnelle des Franqais. Textes et Commentaires," par F, E. Planteau, translator for the Court of Appeal in Paris. In making the translation of the Constitutions of 1793, 1795, and 1799, the author was assisted by the work of Bernard Roelker on " The Consti- tutions of France," as he was also largely aided by the translations of the Constitutions of 1814, 1830, 1848, and 1852, made by Francis Lieber, LL.D., in hie work on "Civil Liberty." Scarcely a page of this book could have been written without reference to the following works, among others, which have been consulted, quoted, or mentioned, and from whose pages expressions, and even sentences, have X PREFATORY NOTE. been made use of by the author. The works referred to are: The works of Thiers, Taine, .Lamartine, Blanc, Mignet, Capefigue, Michelet, Guizot, Morley, Scherer, Lockroy, Hugo, De Tocqueville, and Sir Erskine May. " Histoire de la Civilisation Contemporaine en France," par Alfred Rambaud;"La France dii Centenaire," par Edouard Goumy; "Journal Officiel;" " Les Constitutions de la France," par Faustin Helie; " Les Orateurs de la Constituante, de la .Legislative, de la Convention," par Aulard; " Histoire Parlementaire de la Revolution," par Buchez et Roux; " La France en 1789," par Pezard; "Le Centenaire de 1789," par E. D'Argill; "The Code Napo- leon;" " Les Constitutions Europeennes," par Demom- lynes; "Les Constitutions Fran(,-aises," par Plouard; "La Constitution Frangaise de 1875," par M. M. Bard et Robiquet; "Codes et Lois," par Roger et Sorel; " Droit Administratif," par Aucoc, and " Etudes Admin- istratives," par Vivien. In the preparation of Chapters V, VI, and VH, the author has, in his statement of the historic facts, drawn freely from the work of M. Planteau, but in such a man- ner as not to make that writer in any way responsible for the opinions of others that may have been added, or for the arguments or reflections that are expressed in that portion of this work. On September 22, 1889, the quadrennial elections for deputies took place, under the provisions of the law of July 17, and resulted in a victory for the Government. The re-balloting which occurred October 6 further strengthened the party that favors the continuance of the Parliamentary Republic. CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF FRANCE. THE REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST REPUBLIC. Wheaever an advance in governmental evolution has been suggested, or advocated, by great parties springing from the people, the events of French history, from the time of the encyclopedists to the present day, have generally been distorted by the reactionary forces which usually constitute the opposition to reform; and when, in the last loo years, it was proposed to do away with the remnants of feudalism, abolish slavery, extend the popular suffrage, and establish parliamentary government, by some strange paradox in reasoning, the experiences and struggles of this brave people, in their march from abso- lutism to democracy, have been paraded as furnishing a dreadful example against any attempt for the betterment of mankind. When it was suggested in England to abolish the slave trade, and repeal the Test Act, ghastly references were made to noyades, fusillades, and guillotines; and Sir Robert Peel was warned, in his effort to reform the corn laws, that he was bringing about a catastrophe like that of 1789, while Cobden and Bright were likened to Baboeuf, (11) 12 CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF FRANCE. Chaumette, and Anacharsis Clootz. Robespierre, Dan- ton, and Marat were trotted forth in their sanguinary winding-sheets, and treated as the counterparts and pre- cursors of "modern worthies," and an innocent meeting of voters has recalled to some well-known writers lurid visions of the Cordeliers and Jacobin Clubs. Mr. John Morley has been described as the Saint Just of the English revolution of the present day. " It would have been just as well," says Morley, " to call me Nero, Torquemada, lago, or Bluebeard." The course pur- sued toward this publicist illustrates the general treat- ment of French politics and governmental reform by the English-speaking people. The idea underlying what is known as conservative thought is, that if the French had never had a revolution of their own, and had never been compelled to resort to extreme measures to overthrow bad government in their country, that good government would have grown faster in the rest of the world.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • After Robespierre
    J . After Robespierre THE THERMIDORIAN REACTION Mter Robespierre THE THERMIDORIAN REACTION By ALBERT MATHIEZ Translated from the French by Catherine Alison Phillips The Universal Library GROSSET & DUNLAP NEW YORK COPYRIGHT ©1931 BY ALFRED A. KNOPF, INC. ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED AS La Reaction Thermidorienne COPYRIGHT 1929 BY MAX LECLERC ET CIE UNIVERSAL LIBRARY EDITION, 1965 BY ARRANGEMENT WITH ALFRED A. KNOPF, INC. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 65·14385 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PREFACE So far as order of time is concerned, M. M athie( s study of the Thermidorian Reaction, of which the present volume is a translation, is a continuation of his history of the French Revolution, of which the English version was published in 1928. In form and character, however, there is a notable difference. In the case of the earlier work the limitations imposed by the publishers excluded all references and foot-notes, and the author had to refer the reader to his other published works for the evidence on which his conclusions were based. In the case of the present book no such limitations have been set, and M. Mathiei: has thus been able not only to state his con­ clusions, but to give the chain of reasoning by which they have been reached. The Thermidorian Reaction is therefore something more than a sequel to The French Revolution, which M. Mathiei:, with perhaps undue modesty, has described as a precis having no independent authority; it is not only a work of art, but a weighty contribution to historical science. In the preface to his French Revolution M.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaux-Arts.Pdf
    PREFACE For more than two centuries, the Palais Bourbon and the Hôtell de Lassay have been at the heart of French political life. From the very moment the Council of Five Hundred moved there in 1798, the edifices lost their original residentiiaal function and became the seat of national sovereignty and the cradle of our Republican values. These ancient walls resonate with the grand voices which, togetther, have made France and which have shown us and continue to guide us along the patth of liberty and solidarity: Lamartine, Schœlcher, Hugo, Jaurès, Clemenceau, but also,, more recently, Robert Badinter or Simone Veil. These splendid buildings are also an extraordinary testtament to the architectural and artistic development of our country, from the Regency to the modern daay. The architect Jules de Joly, the painters Delacroix, Vernet, Pujol, Alechinsky, and JonOne, as well as the sculptor De Maria, have all left their indelible mark here. Their artistic interpretations speak to us of France, of the demands of democratic debate and of our collective capacity to overcome our divisions. These national palaces, brimming with history, are also, through the parliamentary sittings, the daily arena for the work of MPs, their assisttants and of the civil servants of the National Assembbly. The work of Parliament must be better known by all. More than ever, our Assembly, which is the expression of direct universal suffrage, mustt be the shared house of all French citizens. New technologies have enabled us to make huge steps in the field of transparency and the National Assembly will continue its efforts in this direction, in the same way as it wishes to allow its heritage to be accessible to all.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlines of the French Revolution Told in Autographs
    mmm> j^H^^a J wMm?imm President White Library Cornell University Cornell University Library , l l rench Revolution told i iii iii ili??iii?iMn!i l!S.„f 3 1924 032 226 olm.anx 684 &«J Cornell University Library 'Be h The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924032226684 OUTLINES OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION TOLDr IN AUTOGRAPHS [SELECTED FROM A PRIVATE COLLECTION] EXHIBITED AT THE LENOX BRANCH OF THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY MARCH 20, 1905 I/. ABBREVIATIONS. signed. A. L. S. Autograph letter signed. A. D. S. Autograph document L. S. Letter Signed. D. S. Document Signed. A. L. Autograph Letter. A. D. Autograph document. P. Portrait. I. Illustration. ^5f*0RD BEACONSFIELD — groping for comparisons — declared that 111 there were only two events in history: The Siege of Troy and ^^ the French Revolution. The present exhibition of autographs is an attempt to teach the outlines of history, and particularly of the French Revolution, by means of holographic illustration. The writing of a man, it is held, is the most perfect relic he leaves behind him. Something physical, as well as intellectual and moral, belonging to his personality, has gone into the material substance carrying his writing. A limited space makes the selection of characters a. difficult matter. All students are not likely to agree in regard to the eminence and importance of some individuals who had part in the great event here illustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Fouché Justifies Bonaparte's Brumaire Coup J. David Markham When
    Fouché Justifies Bonaparte’s Brumaire Coup J. David Markham When General Bonaparte returned from Egypt in October of 1799, he found a France in political turmoil. The ruling Directory was corrupt and very unpopular. Talk of a coup was in the air and there were at least two being planned. The more important group plotting a coup included Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, Roger Ducos, Lucien Bonaparte among others. Among the ‘others’ was one Joseph Fouché, who was minister of police at the time. To be successful, the coup needed support of the army, and Bonaparte, who had known republican leanings, was the ultimate choice. Once the coup took place on 18 Brumaire (8-9 November 1799), Napoleon was installed as First Consul and the period of France known as the Consulate began. It fell upon Fouché to provide a public explanation and justification for what had happened. This very rare document is that explanation and justification, distributed to the French Public on 11 November, 1799. The scan of the document is followed by the translation by Dr. Bill Chew III. The engraving is from my personal collection, as is the document. EQUALITY – LIBERTY The Minister of the General Police of the Republic, to His Fellow Citizens. Of the 20th Brumaire, Year 8 of the French Republic, one and indivisible. Citizens, The Government was too weak to sustain the glory of the Republic against the external enemies, and guarantee the rights of Citizens against the domestic factions: it had become necessary to consider giving that government power and greatness. The national wisdom, the Council of Ancients, conceived of this thought, and manifested the necessary will.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet Affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Whittaker, Kelly Diane, "Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 1437. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1437 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN NAPOLEONIC FRANCE: THE MALET AFFAIR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In The Department of History by Kelly Diane Whittaker B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002 December, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract . iii Introduction . .1 Chapter One General Malet: A Biography . 8 Two Hopes and Disappointments in Napoleonic France . 46 Three General Malet’s Final Attempt, 22 October 1812 . 73 Conclusion . 95 Notes . .100 Bibliography . .112 Vita . 115 ii ABSTRACT The French Revolution ushered in a period of political unrest in France which appeared never-ending, even when a seemingly stable government rose to power. After a series of failed Republican governments, Napoleon Bonaparte seized control on 18 Brumaire VIII, promising to uphold the revolutionary ideals that had permeated the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Delnore Allysonjaye 2004.Pdf
    Political Convictions: French De(X>rtation Projects in the Age of Revolutions, 1791·1854 Allyson Jaye Delnore Char!olles,·ille. Virginia B.A., Wesuninsler College. 1996 M.A., University ofMass.achusetts, 1998 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor ofPhiJosophy Department of History University of Virginia August 10M © Copyright by Allyson Jaye Delnore All Rights Reserved August 2004 Abstract Political Convictions: French Deportation Projects in the Age of Revolutions, 1791-1854 This work studies the role of deportation in the punishment of political protest and the consolidation of power in France between the French Revolution and the Second Empire. In particular, it traces the development of an official policy of colonizing the overseas empire with French deportees. Approximately 10,000 individuals were deported within the French overseas empire as a result of colonization through deportation efforts during this period. Of these men and women, the vast majority had been implicated in crimes of protest or revolution. In fact, deportation decrees became a common official response to social and political troubles throughout greater France during the Age of Revolutions. Though little known, the history of deportation is the story of various interest groups negotiating within a political culture that valued three different goals, all of which spanned changes in government and governing ideology between the Revolution of 1789 and the Second Empire: (1) cleansing the metropole and colonies of revolutionary elements, (2) improving the economic situation of existing colonies, and (3) finding French men and women to serve as pioneers in new lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleonic France { 1799-1814 Background
    Napoleonic France { 1799-1814 Background Born in 1769 in Corsica (ethnic Italian). Family was minor nobility, but rose to prominence due to efforts of his father at Versailles. Napoleon attended military school – became an artillery commander. He supported the Jacobins (was close with Robespierre’s brother), joined the revolutionary army. He supported the end of noble/feudal privilege. His career took off as a result. He was not as radical as most Jacobins. Views were closer to Locke than Rousseau. Saw leadership along the lines of Hobbes – that a benevolent despot was most effective form of government. Rise to Power • First gained notoriety for helping recapture Toulon from the counter-revolutionaries during the federalist revolts in 1793. • In 1795 he defended the Directory by suppressing a royalist revolt called the Insurrection of Vendemiare with a “whiff of Grapeshot.” • As a result, the Directory gave him command of the “Army of Italy” waging war against the Austrians. • His brilliant tactics led to great French victories. • He personally negotiated the Treaty of Campo Formio in 1797 which ended the War against the First Coalition. • France established “sister republics” in Italy as a result. Napoleon’s popularity grew. He now wanted to strike at the British – the most serious of France’s enemies. He led a campaign to Egypt, which he conquered. He threatened to march to India and cripple the British economy. However, he got tied down fighting in Egypt. At the Battle of the Nile, Napoleon’s navy was routed by the British under Admiral Nelson. His army was stranded in Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Diplomatic Corps, 1789-1799
    ““PPrroovveenn PPaattrriioottss””:: tthhee FFrreenncchh DDiipplloommaattiicc CCoorrppss,, 11778899--11779999 Linda S. Frey and Marsha L. Frey St Andrews Studies in French History and Culture ST ANDREWS STUDIES IN FRENCH HISTORY AND CULTURE The history and historical culture of the French-speaking world is a major field of interest among English-speaking scholars. The purpose of this series is to publish a range of shorter monographs and studies, between 25,000 and 50,000 words long, which illuminate the history of this community of peoples between the end of the Middle Ages and the late twentieth century. The series covers the full span of historical themes relating to France: from political history, through military/naval, diplomatic, religious, social, financial, cultural and intellectual history, art and architectural history, to literary culture. Titles in the series are rigorously peer-reviewed through the editorial board and external assessors, and are published as both e-books and paperbacks. Editorial Board Dr Guy Rowlands, University of St Andrews (Editor-in-Chief) Professor Andrew Pettegree, University of St Andrews Professor Andrew Williams, University of St Andrews Dr David Culpin, University of St Andrews Dr David Evans, University of St Andrews Dr Justine Firnhaber-Baker, University of St Andrews Dr Linda Goddard, University of St Andrews Dr Bernhard Struck, University of St Andrews Dr Stephen Tyre, University of St Andrews Dr Malcolm Walsby, University of St Andrews Dr David Parrott, University of Oxford Professor Alexander Marr, University of St Andrews/University of Southern California Dr Sandy Wilkinson, University College Dublin Professor Rafe Blaufarb, Florida State University Professor Darrin McMahon, Florida State University Dr Simon Kitson, University of London Institute in Paris Professor Eric Nelson, Missouri State University “Proven Patriots”: the French Diplomatic Corps, 1789-1799 by LINDA S.
    [Show full text]
  • James Madison, Benjamin Constant, and the Liberal-Republican Framework for Political Neutrality
    ‘The Great Desideratum in Government’: James Madison, Benjamin Constant, and the Liberal-Republican Framework for Political Neutrality A Thesis Submitted to the University of Manchester for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 James A. Shaw School of Arts, Languages, and Cultures Table of Contents Abstract 3 Declaration 4 Acknowledgements 5 Introduction – Liberalism, Republicanism, and the Idea of Political Neutrality 8 Part One – The Idea of Neutrality 28 Chapter One – A Shared Intellectual Heritage: Modernity, the Public Good, and the Foundations of Political Neutrality 29 1.1: The Science of Politics at Edinburgh and Princeton 32 1.2: Virtue, Pluralism, and the Public Good 42 1.3: Neutrality and Political Science 51 Chapter Two – Law, Sovereignty, and a Liberal-Republican Conception of Liberty 54 2.1: Freedom and the State: Conceptions of Liberty in the Eighteenth Century 56 2.2: Madison: The Free State and Higher Law Foundations of Negative Liberty 59 2.3: Constant: Modern Liberty 72 Part Two – Inventing the Neutral State 88 Chapter Three – Bicameralism and the Equilibrium of Interests in the Extensive Republic 89 3.1: Hume, Montesquieu, and the Small Republic Debate 93 3.2: Nemo Iudex in Causa Sua: Balancing Popular and Impartial Governance 98 3.3: The Auxiliary Desideratum: The Invention of a Patrician Elite 108 3.4: An Effectual Remedy of Two Parts: Neutral Congressional Authority in Federalist Theory 112 Chapter Four – The Common Interest, Decentralisation, and L’élection sectionnaire 116 4.1: ‘A
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Humbling Tyrants: Irish Revolutionary Internationalism During the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Era, 1789-1815 Nicholas Stark
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2014 The Art of Humbling Tyrants: Irish Revolutionary Internationalism during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Era, 1789-1815 Nicholas Stark Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE ART OF HUMBLING TYRANTS: IRISH REVOLUTIONARY INTERNATIONALISM DURING THE FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY AND NAPOLEONIC ERA, 1789-1815 By NICHOLAS STARK A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2014 © 2014 Nicholas Stark Nicholas Stark defended this thesis on March 27, 2014. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Thesis Darrin M. McMahon Committee Member Jonathan Grant Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my adviser, Rafe Blaufarb, for all of his help in guiding me through the process of my thesis and degree, in addition to the teaching he has provided. Serving with him as his research assistant has also been very enlightening and rewarding. In addition, I wish to express my gratitude to the Institute on Napoleon and the French Revolution at Florida State University (FSU) for providing excellent resources and materials for my education and research. The staff in Special Collections, Strozier Library at FSU has also been most helpful. Outside of the university, the archivists in Manuscripts at Trinity College Dublin and the National Library of Ireland deserve special note.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Dynasty, Nobility and Notables of the Napoleonic Empire
    Appendix 1: Dynasty, Nobility and Notables of the Napoleonic Empire A Napoleon Emperor of the French, Jg o~taly, Mediator of the Swiss Confederation, Protector of the Confederation of the Rhine, etc. Princes of the first order: memtrs of or\ose related by marriage to the Imperial family who became satellite kings: Joseph, king of Naples (March 1806) and then of Spain (June 1808); Louis, king of Holland (June 1806-July 1810); Ur6me, king of Westphalia (July 1807); Joachim Murat (m. Caroline Bonaparte), grand duke of Berg (March 1806) and king of Naples (July 1808) Princes(ses) of the selnd order: Elisa Bo~e (m. F6lix Bacciochi), princess of Piombino (1805) and of Lucca (1806), grand duchess of Tuscany (1809); Eug~ne de Beauharnais, viceroy ofltaly (June 1805); Berthier, prince ofNeuchitel (March 1806) and of Wagram (December 1809) Princes of the J order: Talleyrand, prince of Bene\ento (June 1806); Bernadotte, prince of Ponte Corvo (June 1806) [crown prince of Sweden, October 1810] The 22 recipien! of the 'ducal grand-fiefs of the Empire'\.eated in March 1806 from conquered lands around Venice, in the kingdom of Naples, in Massa-Carrara, Parma and Piacenza. Similar endowments were later made from the conquered lands which formed the duchy of Warsaw (July 1807) These weret.anted to Napoleon's top military commanders, in\uding most of the marshals, or to members of his family, and were convertible into hereditary estates (majorats) The duk!s, counts, barons and chevaliers of the Empire created after le March decrees of 1808, and who together
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France Kelly Diane Jernigan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2015 Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France Kelly Diane Jernigan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Jernigan, Kelly Diane, "Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France" (2015). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1198. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1198 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN NAPOLEONIC FRANCE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Kelly D. Jernigan B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002 M.A., Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2007 May 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research and writing that went into this dissertation may have been my own personal projects, but throughout the process, I recognized that I had a whole team of people working alongside me. Without them, I never would have pushed myself so hard and I probably would not have finished my degree. I will be eternally grateful for their support. To start, I want to recognize the contributions of my two-year-old daughter Mileena. I will always remember you sitting with me so you could “help Mommy work.” When you took over my laptop, you never deleted any chapters, for which I am grateful.
    [Show full text]