DOCSLIB.ORG

Napoleonic France { 1799-1814 Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Napoleonic France { 1799-1814 Background Napoleonic France { 1799-1814 Background Born in 1769 in Corsica (ethnic Italian). Family was minor nobility, but rose to prominence due to efforts of his father at Versailles. Napoleon attended military school – became an artillery commander. He supported the Jacobins (was close with Robespierre’s brother), joined the revolutionary army. He supported the end of noble/feudal privilege. His career took off as a result. He was not as radical as most Jacobins. Views were closer to Locke than Rousseau. Saw leadership along the lines of Hobbes – that a benevolent despot was most effective form of government. Rise to Power • First gained notoriety for helping recapture Toulon from the counter-revolutionaries during the federalist revolts in 1793. • In 1795 he defended the Directory by suppressing a royalist revolt called the Insurrection of Vendemiare with a “whiff of Grapeshot.” • As a result, the Directory gave him command of the “Army of Italy” waging war against the Austrians. • His brilliant tactics led to great French victories. • He personally negotiated the Treaty of Campo Formio in 1797 which ended the War against the First Coalition. • France established “sister republics” in Italy as a result. Napoleon’s popularity grew. He now wanted to strike at the British – the most serious of France’s enemies. He led a campaign to Egypt, which he conquered. He threatened to march to India and cripple the British economy. However, he got tied down fighting in Egypt. At the Battle of the Nile, Napoleon’s navy was routed by the British under Admiral Nelson. His army was stranded in Egypt. Napoleon managed to slip back into France at an opportune time. While Napoleon was in Egypt, the war took a turn for the worse. A Second Coalition against France had retaken lands in Italy and were threatening invasion. The Directory was unpopular due to this and paralyzed by corruption and in-fighting. Napoleon was invited to join a group conspiring to overthrow the gov. and “revise” the constitution (Abbe Sieyes, Roger Ducos, Joseph Fouche, Lucien Bonaparte). This group feared a return to radicalism and wanted to secure order. They wanted to use Napoleon’s popularity with the public and the troops. 1799 Coup de Brumaire – Napoleon uses force to clear the Council of 500 and Council of Ancients. Sieyes, Ducos, and Napoleon were to rule as consuls until a new constitution could be drafted. Using his popularity, Napoleon came to dominate his fellow consuls. Constitution of the Year VIII Napoleon puts a new constitution to a country wide vote. Unlike previous ones, there was no human rights charter. It essentially gave Napoleon dictatorial powers as First Consul. It passed 3 million for, 1500 against! WHY? Napoleon was a heroic figure. People were ready for stability after years of chaos. They feared the Second Coalition forces advancing on France. It maintained the illusion of democracy. There was an elected legislative – but its powers were subject to Napoleon’s will. In 1802 – Napoleon convinced the Senate to amend the constitution and give him the position of “Consul for Life” (Constitution of the Year X) He also gained the right to appoint his successor. In 1804 Napoleon took up residence in the Tuileries and another amendment established the FRENCH EMPIRE with Napoleon as Emperor and the Bonaparte family as the hereditary successors. HOW? Napoleon was loved. People ready for stability. Was successful for long time. Napoleon’s Domestic Policies 1) The Concordat - 1801 Napoleon healed the rift between Rome and Paris that developed during the Revolution by coming to an agreement with the Pope. • The State continued to appoint and pay clergy, but they were invested (confirmed) by the Pope. • Churches were re-opened and Priests were no longer required to swear an oath to the State (as in the CCC). • Catholicism recognized as the “religion of the majority of Frenchmen.” In return the Church recognized the Republic (and later the Empire) as legitimate and renounced claims to the lands that were nationalized by the revolutionary government. This was a shrewd move by Napoleon: • Majority of people were faithful to Church and happy to return to services. • Owners of former Church lands were secure in their title to it. • He realized that the Church could be used to legitimize his authority (much like “Divine Right”) and maintain obedience to him. • Papal recognition could reduce hostility of other Christian empires that had resisted revolutionary France. • Religious toleration extended to Protestants and later to Jews (1808). 2) Bank of France Economy was still a mess in 1800. The Bank of France was created in Jan. 1800 funded by a combination of private and public money. •The Bank issued government securities and supplied low interest loans to businesses to promote growth of industry. •The Franc became the most stable currency in Europe. •B of F finally stabilized the French economy after years of chaos and debt. 3) Tax Reform Napoleon made tax collection more efficient. Collectors were made professional government employees. He continued the revolutionary tradition of offering NO TAX EXEMPTIONS. There were a series of direct taxes on land, businesses, and personal property. He also established indirect taxes on luxury items, wine, playing cards, etc. 4) Government System Napoleon believed in “government for the people” not “by the people.” He maintained legislative bodies in the form of a Senate, Tribunate, and Leg. Council. However, none were elected by universal suffrage. Elections were held to determine “lists” of candidates that Napoleon would use to appoint someone (illusion of democracy). Power was centralized by Napoleon. Each region had a prefect that was directly responsible to him. Practiced censorship of the press and rooted out Jacobin and Royalist factions using an effective secret police under his “Minister of Police” Joseph Fouche. 5) Napoleonic Code “We are a nation with 300 books of laws, yet without laws.” Organized the hundreds of laws passed during the Rev. and codified them for the entire nation. This made the law more uniform and legal processes less confusing. Napoleon saw it as his greatest achievement. Was very involved in its creation. Completed in 1801, printed in 1804. Was a mix of revolutionary and conservative laws. Highlights of the Code.......for male citizens: • Equality before the law • Freedom from arrest without due process • Equality of taxation • The right to choose one’s work • Religious freedom. The code reflected Napoleon’s paternalistic nature. Women were second class citizens. The father (and later the husband) had great control over women. Females could not act independent of their consent. EX – Divorce was difficult to obtain. Seen as a way of “protecting” women. Unlike in England and in modern times, individuals had to prove their innocence (“guilty until proven innocent”) Punishments included: a) The guillotine b) Labour on a chain gang c) Confinement to a workhouse. 6) Education Built on the public system established by the Convention. “Equality must be the first element in education.” GOAL: Produce skilled civil servants to do the work of the State. 1802 – Napoleon introduced LYCEES (similar to High Schools). After the Lycees, students went on to specialized schools of law, medicine, pharmacy, military, or teaching. Students wrote baccalaureate exams to qualify for university. System still in use today. Girls got training in running a household, child-rearing, needlework, singing, dancing, and nursing. Primary years education was still handled by the Catholic Church. 7) The Legion of Honour GOAL – to reward exceptional service to the nation and keep the loyalty of the most talented. Awards for civil or military achievement. Prize was a medal and money (250-5000 Francs per year). Given to 30,000 during Napoleon’s life time. It is still given out. Like a new noble class based on merit. 8) Public Works Napoleon invested in improving transportation and communication infrastructure of France. Constructed canals and developed ports to enhance trade. Built roads through the Alps to Italy and the Riviera. In Paris, new roads, bridges, and a sewer system. Constructed the Arc de Triomphe. All of this improved the economy – it also created jobs and increased prestige of Napoleon. Napoleon’s Foreign Policy Napoleon was at war for almost his entire reign. WHY? – There are opposing views: 1) Hostility of other European powers. - They wanted to contain the spread of revolutionary ideas in Europe. - Napoleon’s expansion to France’s “natural borders” threatened their own spheres of influence (Austria in Italy& Low countries / Prussia and Russia in Poland) - “I always appear to be attacking, yet what I am doing is defending myself all of the time.” - NAP 2) Napoleon’s Expansionism - He sought personal power and glory (ex. he put family members on the throne of Europe). - Many in France fought to spread liberty and equality. - ECONOMIC reasons are important. Empire meant wealth and power (like Britain). • France was well behind Britain (industrialization and world trade) . Napoleon aimed to attack their commerce. • Austria was the dominant continental power with a large European Empire. France wanted to gobble up resource rich areas. • Prussia and Russia were also growing in strength – Napoleon wished to check their ambitions. War Vs. Third and Fourth Coalitions (1805-1807) Despite the Peace of Amiens between the two countries in 1802 (ending the previous war) neither the British or the French trusted each other. Britain declared war in 1803 and imposed a naval blockade on France. Bonaparte made ready to invade Britain – however Austria and Russia were preparing to declare war on France as well. They feared Napoleon’s imperial designs on central Europe. Napoleon turned his army eastwards to focus on continental powers. When Napoleon’s navy was routed by Nelson (again!) at the Battle of Trafalgar (Oct 1805), Napoleon gave up on his plans to invade Britain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pierre Riel, the Marquis De Beurnonville at the Spanish Court and Napoleon Bonaparte's Spanish Policy, 1802-05 Michael W
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Fear and Domination: Pierre Riel, the Marquis de Beurnonville at the Spanish Court and Napoleon Bonaparte's Spanish Policy, 1802-05 Michael W. Jones Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Fear and Domination: Pierre Riel, the Marquis de Beurnonville at the Spanish Court and Napoleon Bonaparte’s Spanish Policy, 1802-05 By Michael W. Jones A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester 2005 Copyright 2004 Michael W. Jones All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approved the dissertation of Michael W. Jones defended on 28 April 2004. ________________________________ Donald D. Horward Professor Directing Dissertation ________________________________ Outside Committee Member Patrick O’Sullivan ________________________________ Jonathan Grant Committee Member ________________________________ James Jones Committee Member ________________________________ Paul Halpern Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my father Leonard William Jones and my mother Vianne Ruffino Jones. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Earning a Ph.D. has been the most difficult task of my life. It is an endeavor, which involved numerous professors, students, colleagues, friends and family. When I started at Florida State University in August 1994, I had no comprehension of how difficult it would be for everyone involved. Because of the help and kindness of these dear friends and family, I have finally accomplished my dream.
    [Show full text]
  • After Robespierre
    J . After Robespierre THE THERMIDORIAN REACTION Mter Robespierre THE THERMIDORIAN REACTION By ALBERT MATHIEZ Translated from the French by Catherine Alison Phillips The Universal Library GROSSET & DUNLAP NEW YORK COPYRIGHT ©1931 BY ALFRED A. KNOPF, INC. ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED AS La Reaction Thermidorienne COPYRIGHT 1929 BY MAX LECLERC ET CIE UNIVERSAL LIBRARY EDITION, 1965 BY ARRANGEMENT WITH ALFRED A. KNOPF, INC. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 65·14385 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PREFACE So far as order of time is concerned, M. M athie( s study of the Thermidorian Reaction, of which the present volume is a translation, is a continuation of his history of the French Revolution, of which the English version was published in 1928. In form and character, however, there is a notable difference. In the case of the earlier work the limitations imposed by the publishers excluded all references and foot-notes, and the author had to refer the reader to his other published works for the evidence on which his conclusions were based. In the case of the present book no such limitations have been set, and M. Mathiei: has thus been able not only to state his con­ clusions, but to give the chain of reasoning by which they have been reached. The Thermidorian Reaction is therefore something more than a sequel to The French Revolution, which M. Mathiei:, with perhaps undue modesty, has described as a precis having no independent authority; it is not only a work of art, but a weighty contribution to historical science. In the preface to his French Revolution M.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Shares for All
    FAIR SHARES FOR ALL JACOBIN EGALITARIANISM IN PRACT ICE JEAN-PIERRE GROSS This study explores the egalitarian policies pursued in the provinces during the radical phase of the French Revolution, but moves away from the habit of looking at such issues in terms of the Terror alone. It challenges revisionist readings of Jacobinism that dwell on its totalitarian potential or portray it as dangerously Utopian. The mainstream Jacobin agenda held out the promise of 'fair shares' and equal opportunities for all in a private-ownership market economy. It sought to achieve social justice without jeopardising human rights and tended thus to complement, rather than undermine, the liberal, individualist programme of the Revolution. The book stresses the relevance of the 'Enlightenment legacy', the close affinities between Girondins and Montagnards, the key role played by many lesser-known figures and the moral ascendancy of Robespierre. It reassesses the basic social and economic issues at stake in the Revolution, which cannot be adequately understood solely in terms of political discourse. Past and Present Publications Fair shares for all Past and Present Publications General Editor: JOANNA INNES, Somerville College, Oxford Past and Present Publications comprise books similar in character to the articles in the journal Past and Present. Whether the volumes in the series are collections of essays - some previously published, others new studies - or mono- graphs, they encompass a wide variety of scholarly and original works primarily concerned with social, economic and cultural changes, and their causes and consequences. They will appeal to both specialists and non-specialists and will endeavour to communicate the results of historical and allied research in readable and lively form.
    [Show full text]
  • Le 13 Vendémiaire, Sacre Républicain De Bonaparte
    MÉMOIRE POUR AUJOURD’HUI Le 13 Vendémiaire, sacre républicain de Bonaparte L’année 2021 marquera le bicentenaire de la mort de Napoléon. Le géné- ral Michel Franceschi nous fait découvrir ici et partager dans les prochains numéros quelques unes des innombrables facettes, souvent méconnues, parfois dénigrées, de ces 20 ans d’histoire de France. En complément, nous évoquerons, dans la rubrique Culture de cette revue, certains des ouvrages que l’auteur a déjà édités à l’occasion de cet anniversaire. Souhaitons que la repentance ne conduise pas nos autorités et nos médias à altérer voire à effacer cette incomparable page grandiose de notre histoire. En cet automne 1795, le jeune général Napoléon Bonaparte se trouve à Paris en attente d’un hypothétique départ en mission à Constantinople, faute du commandement militaire impor- tant qu’aurait dû valoir au « capitaine canon » sa bril- lante victoire à Toulon sur les Anglais en décembre 1793. Son refus d’un comman- dement en Vendée contre les Chouans (« Jamais mon épée contre le peuple ») l’a même rendu suspect au pouvoir politique. Battant le pavé, découragé et famé- lique, il se morfond à Paris, désespérant de son avenir. Dans le pays, l’inquiétude La journée du 13 Vendémiaire (5 octobre 1795). Le général Bonaparte commande au plus près des combats ses pièces d’artillerie est générale. Ayant succédé à l’Assemblée législative le 21 septembre 1792, la Convention nationale est en situation poli- tique précaire, menacée sur ses deux ailes. À gauche, les derniers partisans jacobins de Robespierre, surnommés les « Sans-culottes », ne se résignent pas à leur perte du pouvoir et entretiennent une sanglante agitation dans tout le pays.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the Future of France
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2017 Visionaries in opposition: Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the future of France Seth J. Browner Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Browner, Seth J., "Visionaries in opposition: Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the future of France". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2017. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/621 Visionaries in opposition: Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the Future of France Seth Browner History Senior Thesis Professor Kathleen Kete Spring, 2017 2 Introduction: Two men and France in the balance It was January 28, 1809. Napoleon Bonaparte, crowned Emperor of the French in 1804, returned to Paris. Napoleon spent most of his time as emperor away, fighting various wars. But, frightful words had reached his ears that impelled him to return to France. He was told that Joseph Fouché, the Minister of Police, and Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, had held a meeting behind his back. The fact alone that Fouché and Talleyrand were meeting was curious. They loathed each other. Fouché and Talleyrand had launched public attacks against each other for years. When Napoleon heard these two were trying to reach a reconciliation, he greeted it with suspicion immediately. He called Fouché and Talleyrand to his office along with three other high-ranking members of the government. Napoleon reminded Fouché and Talleyrand that they swore an oath of allegiance when the coup of 18 Brumaire was staged in 1799.
    [Show full text]
  • NAPOLEON a Screenplay by Stanley Kubrick September 29, 1969
    NAPOLEON A Screenplay by Stanley Kubrick September 29, 1969 Converted to PDF by mypdfscripts.com FADE IN: INT. BEDROOM CORSICA - NIGHT A well worn teddy-bear is cradled in the arms of Napoleon, age 4, who dreamily sucks his thumb, listening to a bedtime story told by his young mother, Letizia. His 5-year old brother, Joseph, is already asleep, beside him. NARRATOR Napoleon was born at Ajaccio in Corsica on August 15th, 1769. He had not been a healthy baby and his mother, Letizia, lavished him with care and devotion. In middle age, he would write about her from St. Helena. NAPOLEON (V.O.) My mother has always loved me. She would do anything for me. MAIN TITLES INT. DORMITORY BRIENNE - NIGHT It is still dark on a freezing winter morning. The boys are being awakened by a monk, loudly ringing a bell. Candles are lit. Napoleon, age 9, sun-tanned, leaps out of bed, rubbing his arms and shivering. He tries to pour a pitcher of water, discovering that it has frozen solid. NAPOLEON Who has been putting glass in my pitcher? Look here, someone has filled my pitcher with glass! DUFOUR Oh, my goodness! Someone has filled Bonaparte's pitcher with glass. Now, who on earth would do a thing like that? BREMOND Oh, heavens, look someone has filled my pitcher with glass too! 2. MONK Silence! Silence! You should not make fun of Monsieur Bonaparte, he comes from a country where it is never very cold. He has probably never seen ice before. DUFOUR Never seen ice before? Oh, dear me -- how very odd.
    [Show full text]
  • Mémoires D'une Invasion
    CATALOGUECATALOGUE DEDE L’EXPOSITION 1814L’EXPOSITION mémoires d’une invasion sommaire Introduction GÉNÉRALE 3 MÉMOIRES DE MILITAIREs 9 MÉMOIRES D’UNE SOCIÉTÉ 25 MÉMOIRES D’UNE RUPTURE 39 JEUNE TAMBOUR Compagnie de fusiliers du 103e régiment d’infanterie de ligne. Brigade Lamorandière-Ducoudray. Division Vilatte. Corps de Clauzel. Armée de Soult. Bataille d’Aire-sur-l’Adour, 2 mars 1814. AD 40, 40 Fi 6 INTRODUCTION GÉNÉRALE Durant les premiers mois de l’année 1814, le département des Landes est envahi par les armées anglaises, espagnoles et portugaises de la septième coalition, tandis que les départe- ments du nord et de l’est sont envahis par les troupes autri- chiennes, allemandes et russes. Avec l’abdication de Napo- léon le 6 avril 1814, conséquence de la campagne de France, s’achève une période dont l’histoire n’est pas simple à écrire tant elle s’est incarnée dans un homme, adulé ou haï, qui a suscité débats et controverses, inspiré légende dorée et légende noire. La situation diplomatique et militaire domine tellement ces années, que le récit oublie souvent les hommes, surtout les paysans, pourtant l’essentiel de la population française. De Bonaparte à Napoléon Depuis l’avènement de la République, le 21 septembre 1792, l’instabi- lité politique conduit les hommes au pouvoir à recourir à l’armée pour poursuivre l’expérience révolutionnaire. Bonaparte, promu général de brigade après la prise de Toulon, devient conseiller militaire du Direc- toire après son intervention contre l’insurrection royaliste. Le coup d’État des 18 et 19 brumaire an VIII (9-10 novembre 1799) provoque la disparition du Directoire et son remplacement par le Consulat dont le pouvoir exécutif est exercé par trois consuls, Bonaparte, l’abbé Sieyès et le Landais Pierre-Roger Ducos.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaux-Arts.Pdf
    PREFACE For more than two centuries, the Palais Bourbon and the Hôtell de Lassay have been at the heart of French political life. From the very moment the Council of Five Hundred moved there in 1798, the edifices lost their original residentiiaal function and became the seat of national sovereignty and the cradle of our Republican values. These ancient walls resonate with the grand voices which, togetther, have made France and which have shown us and continue to guide us along the patth of liberty and solidarity: Lamartine, Schœlcher, Hugo, Jaurès, Clemenceau, but also,, more recently, Robert Badinter or Simone Veil. These splendid buildings are also an extraordinary testtament to the architectural and artistic development of our country, from the Regency to the modern daay. The architect Jules de Joly, the painters Delacroix, Vernet, Pujol, Alechinsky, and JonOne, as well as the sculptor De Maria, have all left their indelible mark here. Their artistic interpretations speak to us of France, of the demands of democratic debate and of our collective capacity to overcome our divisions. These national palaces, brimming with history, are also, through the parliamentary sittings, the daily arena for the work of MPs, their assisttants and of the civil servants of the National Assembbly. The work of Parliament must be better known by all. More than ever, our Assembly, which is the expression of direct universal suffrage, mustt be the shared house of all French citizens. New technologies have enabled us to make huge steps in the field of transparency and the National Assembly will continue its efforts in this direction, in the same way as it wishes to allow its heritage to be accessible to all.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlines of the French Revolution Told in Autographs
    mmm> j^H^^a J wMm?imm President White Library Cornell University Cornell University Library , l l rench Revolution told i iii iii ili??iii?iMn!i l!S.„f 3 1924 032 226 olm.anx 684 &«J Cornell University Library 'Be h The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924032226684 OUTLINES OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION TOLDr IN AUTOGRAPHS [SELECTED FROM A PRIVATE COLLECTION] EXHIBITED AT THE LENOX BRANCH OF THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY MARCH 20, 1905 I/. ABBREVIATIONS. signed. A. L. S. Autograph letter signed. A. D. S. Autograph document L. S. Letter Signed. D. S. Document Signed. A. L. Autograph Letter. A. D. Autograph document. P. Portrait. I. Illustration. ^5f*0RD BEACONSFIELD — groping for comparisons — declared that 111 there were only two events in history: The Siege of Troy and ^^ the French Revolution. The present exhibition of autographs is an attempt to teach the outlines of history, and particularly of the French Revolution, by means of holographic illustration. The writing of a man, it is held, is the most perfect relic he leaves behind him. Something physical, as well as intellectual and moral, belonging to his personality, has gone into the material substance carrying his writing. A limited space makes the selection of characters a. difficult matter. All students are not likely to agree in regard to the eminence and importance of some individuals who had part in the great event here illustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Fouché Justifies Bonaparte's Brumaire Coup J. David Markham When
    Fouché Justifies Bonaparte’s Brumaire Coup J. David Markham When General Bonaparte returned from Egypt in October of 1799, he found a France in political turmoil. The ruling Directory was corrupt and very unpopular. Talk of a coup was in the air and there were at least two being planned. The more important group plotting a coup included Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, Roger Ducos, Lucien Bonaparte among others. Among the ‘others’ was one Joseph Fouché, who was minister of police at the time. To be successful, the coup needed support of the army, and Bonaparte, who had known republican leanings, was the ultimate choice. Once the coup took place on 18 Brumaire (8-9 November 1799), Napoleon was installed as First Consul and the period of France known as the Consulate began. It fell upon Fouché to provide a public explanation and justification for what had happened. This very rare document is that explanation and justification, distributed to the French Public on 11 November, 1799. The scan of the document is followed by the translation by Dr. Bill Chew III. The engraving is from my personal collection, as is the document. EQUALITY – LIBERTY The Minister of the General Police of the Republic, to His Fellow Citizens. Of the 20th Brumaire, Year 8 of the French Republic, one and indivisible. Citizens, The Government was too weak to sustain the glory of the Republic against the external enemies, and guarantee the rights of Citizens against the domestic factions: it had become necessary to consider giving that government power and greatness. The national wisdom, the Council of Ancients, conceived of this thought, and manifested the necessary will.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Theory in a Napoleonic Context
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Game Theory in a Napoleonic Context Establishing Napoleon‘s Utility and Application to the 1805 War of the Third Coalition Gareth Ranger 2013 Abstract Game theory has existed in the fields of mathematics and economics for over 60 years. This thesis assesses its viability for use in the field of history, and in particular, in the Napoleonic era. It does this by analysing the opening phase of the 1805 War of the Third Coalition, fought between France and the Allies. It starts by examining the existing literature on game theory in the Napoleonic era. It then analyses game theory in order to extract concepts from the theory that have value in a military setting. Third, it makes use of primary and secondary sources to define Napoleon Bonaparte‘s motivational drives. Finally, it uses these drives and game theory in order to assess whether Napoleon‘s opening strategy in the War of the Third Coalition was the best strategy to select.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictatorship in History and Theory: Bonapartism, Caesarism, And
    CY332/Baehr&Richter-FM 0 521 825636 October 15, 2003 8:21 Dictatorship in History and Theory bonapartism, caesarism, and totalitarianism This book is unusual in bringing together the work of historians and political theo- rists under one cover to consider the subject of nineteenth- and twentieth-century dictatorships. A distinguished group of authors examine the complex relationship among nineteenth-century democracy, nationalism, and authoritarianism, paying special attention to the careers of Napoleon I and III and of Bismarck. An important contribution of the book is consideration not only of the momentous episodes of coup d’etat,´ revolution, and imperial foundation that the Napoleonic era heralded, but also the contested political language with which these events were described and assessed. Political thinkers were faced with a battery of new terms – “Bonapartism,” “Caesarism,” and “Imperialism” among them – with which to make sense of their era. In addition to documenting the political history of a revolutionary age, the book examines a series of thinkers – Tocqueville, Marx, Max Weber, Antonio Gramsci, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt – who articulated and helped to reshape our sense of the political. Peter Baehr is Associate Professor of Political Sociology at Lingnan University. His books include Founders, Classics, Canons (2002) and Caesar and the Fading of the Roman World (1998). He is the editor of The Portable Hannah Arendt (2000) and co-editor, with Gordon Wells, of The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings (2002) and Max Weber (1995). Melvin Richter is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the City University of New York, Graduate Center, and Hunter College.
    [Show full text]