Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Sharks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Sharks Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Sharks This book explores the global conservation and management of sharks. There has been a rapid decline in populations of many shark species, while new science has emerged concerning the critical role they play in marine ecosystems. However, the authors show that conservation law and policy have been slow to develop, with only a small number of iconic species being protected worldwide. The increase in fishing impact – primarily through shark finning and by-catch – has led to shark conservation receiving greater international attention in recent years. Sharks: Conservation, governance and management surveys our current know- ledge and status of the law and science in relation to sharks, with a particular focus on improving frameworks for their conservation and management. Recent trends are analysed, including shark finning bans that have been put in place in several countries, the widening number of nations establishing shark sanctuaries and the growth of shark- based tourism. The efficacy of current listing processes for endangered species and fisheries regulations is also examined. Tourism is explored as an alternative to fishing and the risks and impacts associated with this industry are analysed. Contributors include leading authorities from universities and conservation organizations in North America, Europe and Australia. A common theme is to emphasize the importance of collaborative governance between various interest groups and the need for inter-disciplinary research and management approaches that are necessary to address the decline in sharks. Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Erika J. Techera is a Professor and Dean in the Faculty of Law at the University of Western Australia. Natalie Klein is a Professor and Dean at Macquarie Law School, Macquarie University, Australia. Thispageintentionallyleftblank Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Sharks Conservation, governance and management Edited by Erika J. Techera and Natalie Klein Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Routledge Taylor & Francis Group ear thscan LONDON AND NEW YORK From Routledge First published 2014 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2014 Erika J. Techera and Natalie Klein The right of the editors to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing- in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging- in-Publication Data Sharks : conservation, governance, and management / edited by Erika J. Techera and Natalie Klein. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Sharks–Conservation. 2. Sharks–Conservation–Government policy. 3. Sharks–Government policy. 4. Sharks–Ecology. I. Techera, Erika J. II. Klein, Natalie (Natalie S.). QL638.9.S4855 2014 338.3'7273–dc23 2013049689 ISBN: 978-0-415-84476-5 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-203-75029-2 (ebk) Typeset in Goudy by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Contents List of figures viii List of tables x List of boxes xi Notes on contributors xii Acknowledgements xvii List of abbreviations xviii Introduction 1 ERIKA J. TECHERA AND NATALIE KLEIN PART I Governance challenges 7 1 Approaches to conservation and governance of marine species 9 ERIKA J. TECHERA 2 The existing global legal regimes 27 NATALIE KLEIN 3 Challenges for international governance 46 Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 MARY LACK PART II Scientific perspectives 67 4 The state of knowledge on sharks for conservation and management 69 JEREMY J. KISZKA AND MICHAEL R. HEITHAUS vi Contents 5 Shark conservation, governance and management: the science–law disconnect 89 PAOLO MOMIGLIANO AND ROB HARCOURT 6 Human perceptions and attitudes towards sharks: examining the predator policy paradox 107 CHRISTOPHER NEFF PART III Actors and stakeholders 133 7 Collaborations for conservation 135 ANISSA LAWRENCE 8 The role of the tourism industry 157 CHRISTINE A. WARD- PAIGE 9 Shark conservation efforts: as diverse as sharks themselves 176 JILL HEPP AND ELIZABETH GRIFFIN WILSON PART IV Risks and rewards 195 10 Economic rationale for shark conservation 197 ANDRÉS M. CISNEROS- MONTEMAYOR AND U. RASHID SUMALIA 11 Iconic species: great white sharks, basking sharks and whale sharks 213 RYAN M. KEMPSTER AND SHAUN P. COLLIN Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 12 Species at the intersection 236 CHARLIE HUVENEERS AND WILLIAM ROBBINS PART V Tools and techniques 261 13 The role of marine protected areas and sanctuaries 263 ERICH HOYT Contents vii 14 Fisheries management and regulations 286 BORIS WORM, AURELIE COSANDEY- GODIN AND BRENDAL DAVIS 15 Synergies, solutions and the way forward 309 NATALIE KLEIN AND ERIKA J. TECHERA Index 324 Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Figures 5.1 Global trend of scientific effort (number of publications) in the period 1992–2011 including in their title, abstract or keywords the words ‘shark’ and ‘conservation’ or ‘management’ 91 5.2 National contributions to shark landings and scientific output 92 5.3 Proportion of the scientific output and taxonomic diversity for each IUCN assessment class, and number of publications for the most well- studied 20 species of sharks grouped by IUCN assessment 95 6.1 Survey responses to pride in local white shark populations in Cape Town, South Africa before and after a shark bite incident 112 6.2 Australia: problem identification 117 6.3 Australia: solution identification 118 6.4 Australia: persons commenting 119 6.5 USA: problem identification 119 6.6 USA: solution identification 120 6.7 USA: persons commenting 121 6.8 South Africa: problem identification 122 6.9 South Africa: solution identification 123 6.10 South Africa: persons commenting 124 7.1 A cross- cutting and integrated approach is needed to drive Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 responsible shark use 144 8.1 Flow chart depicting the role of the tourism industry 161 10.1 Shark watching sites included in this study 199 10.2 Global shark landings and landed value 202 10.3 Net imports of shark products in main Asian markets 203 10.4 Shark marine protection areas including sanctuaries and EEZ- wide finning bans 206 11.1 Photograph of a white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) 215 11.2 Photograph of two whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) 216 Figures ix 11.3 Photograph of a basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) 217 13.1 Shark sanctuaries in EEZ waters 269 14.1 Global distribution of reported shark catches for the year 2011 287 14.2 Shark fishery case studies 295 Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Tables 3.1 Shark species listed on CITES and CMS 52 3.2 Top shark- catching countries, 2002–2011 58 6.1 Comparing white sharks killed in NSW shark nets (1990–2008) and shark bites and fatalities in NSW (1900–2009) 114 8.1 Examples of publications resulting from data generated by the members of the tourism industry 164–5 9.1 Countries that have created shark sanctuaries by prohibiting commercial fishing for sharks in their entire EEZ since the inception of Pew’s global shark conservation campaign 183 9.2 RFMO shark measures prohibiting retention 186 10.1 Locations (by country) with available data on yearly shark watching expenditure 200 10.2 Estimated yearly economic benefits of shark watching by world region 201 11.1 Summary of population trend data for the white shark (Carcharias carcharodon) 223 12.1 List of species or species group that are ‘always’ or ‘very likely’ to be sighted during shark- related tourism 242 12.2 List of countries offering shark- related tourism, along with the number of species ‘always’ or ‘very frequently’ sighted by operators 243 12.3 Summary of studies estimating the value of shark- related Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 tourism 244–7 13.1 Notable shark sanctuaries around the world 270–3 14.1 Major management measures in the top- 20 shark- fishing nations 292 14.2 Consideration matrix for stock management and rebuilding 303 Boxes 3.1 IPOA- Sharks Guidance on Plans of Action 48 3.2 Shark finning controls 60 8.1 Great Fiji Shark Count: tourism industry generated data used for establishing contemporary baselines and monitoring 158 9.1 Organizations with significant shark- related awareness or policy advocacy programmes 178 13.1 Steps to effective MPA management 267 Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:20 15 August 2016 Contributors Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor is a researcher with the Fisheries Economics Research Unit, UBC Fisheries Centre. His background is in marine biology and the economics of marine eco- tourism, and he specializes in resource economics and ecosystem modelling. Andrés continually collaborates on theoretical, applied and field studies, and has worked at venues ranging from fishing villages in Central America and Africa to the UN Headquarters in New York. His current PhD work focuses on the economics of policy strat- egies to aid in sustainable resource use.
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—House H8792
    H8792 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE December 21, 2010 The Shark Conservation Act would end the The SPEAKER pro tempore. The revolving loans, as determined by the Adminis- practice of shark finning in U.S. waters. question is on the motion offered by trator, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities, However, domestic protections alone will not the gentlewoman from Guam (Ms. including through contracts entered into under save sharks. subsection (e) of this section,’’; and BORDALLO) that the House suspend the (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘tons of’’; We need further safeguards to keep marine rules and concur in the Senate amend- (3) in subsection (b)— ecosystems and top predator populations ment to the bill, H.R. 81. (A) by striking paragraph (2); healthy. The Shark Conservation Act will bol- The question was taken; and (two- (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para- ster the U.S.’s position when negotiating for thirds being in the affirmative) the graph (2); and increased international fishery protections. rules were suspended and the Senate (C) in paragraph (2) (as so redesignated)— (i) in subparagraph (A), in the matter pre- Healthy shark populations in our waters can amendment was concurred in. help drive our economy and make our seas ceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘90’’ and inserting A motion to reconsider was laid on ‘‘95’’; thrive. the table. This bill is not just about preserving a spe- (ii) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘10 f percent’’ and inserting ‘‘5 percent’’; and cies, but about preserving an ecosystem, an (iii) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ‘‘the economy, and a sustainable future.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Testimony
    WRITTEN TESTIMONY BY ALAN RISENHOOVER, DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE HEARING ON LEGISLATION ON SHARK FIN AND BILLFISH SALES BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON WATER, POWER AND OCEANS U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 17, 2018 Introduction Good afternoon, Chairman Lamborn, Ranking Member Huffman, and Members of the Subcommittee. My name is Alan Risenhoover and I am the Director of the Office of Sustainable Fisheries within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in the Department of Commerce. Shark and billfish species are important contributors to the nation’s valuable commercial and recreational fisheries as well as serving an important role in our ocean ecosystem. I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you today about the work by NMFS to conserve and manage sharks and billfish and to provide our perspective on the main bills being discussed. Shark Conservation and Management Almost two decades ago Congress prohibited shark finning—which is removing shark fins at sea and discarding the rest of the shark—when it amended the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act by enacting the Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000. The law prohibits any person under U.S. jurisdiction from engaging in the finning of sharks, possessing shark fins aboard a fishing vessel without the corresponding carcass, and landing shark fins without the corresponding carcass. In 2008, NOAA implemented even more stringent regulations to require all Atlantic sharks to be landed with all fins naturally attached to facilitate species identification and reporting and improve the enforceability of existing shark management measures, including the finning ban.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Sharks History of Shark Finning Protection Towards Sharks Importance of Sharks Sharks Are a Top Predator of the Ocean
    Shark Finning Tiana Barron-Wright Fishing for Sharks History of Shark Finning Protection Towards Sharks Importance of Sharks Sharks are a top predator of the ocean. However, sharks are a target Shark fin soup originated in 968 AD by an emperor from the Sung The Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000, was signed by former Sharks play an important role in the ecosystem. Sharks maintain the for humans. Shark finning is the process of cutting off a shark’s Dynasty. The emperor created shark fin soup to display his wealth, President Bill Clinton. This act prohibited the process of shark finning in species below them in the ecosystem and serve as a health indicator for the fins while it is still alive and throwing the shark back into the power and generosity towards his guest. Serving shark fin soup the United States. This bans anyone in the United States jurisdiction from ocean. The decrease of sharks in the oceans has led to the decline of coral ocean where it will die. After getting their fins cut off, some sharks shark finning, owning shark fins without the shark’s body, and landing reefs, sea grass beds, and the loss of commercial fisheries. Without sharks was seen as a show of respect. Chinese Emperors thought the dish in the ecosystem, other predators can thrive. For example, groupers can can starve to death, get eaten by other fish or drown to death. shark fins without the body. This act also has NOAA (National Oceanic had medicinal benefits. Shark fin soup is considered a delicacy in and Atmospheric Administration) Fisheries to give Congress a report increase in numbers and eat herbivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrouded in Mystery Understanding the Conservation Status of Sharks
    MARCH 2015 A publication of the Association of Zoos & Aquariums Shrouded in Mystery Understanding the Conservation Status of Sharks DISPELLING MYTHS SAWFISH RECOVERY LOVE THEM OR HATE THEM Engaging People in Learning Is a Mythical Fish Recovering? Sharks are Both Feared About Sharks and Fascinating March 2015 Features 18 24 30 36 Shrouded in Mystery Dispelling Myths Sawfi sh Recovery Love Them or Hate Them The International Union for Through informative Once abundant in the Sharks are iconic animals Conservation of Nature Red displays, underwater waters of more than 90 that are both feared and List of Threatened Species tunnels, research, interactive countries around the world, fascinating. Misrepresented indicates that 181 of the touch tanks and candid sawfi sh are now extinct from in a wide array of media, the 1,041 species of sharks and conversations with guests, half of their former range, public often struggles to get rays are threatened with Association of Zoos and and all fi ve species are a clear understanding of the extinction, but the number Aquariums-accredited classifi ed as endangered complex and important role could be even higher. facilities have remarkable or critically endangered by that these remarkable fi sh play BY LANCE FRAZER ways of engaging people in the International Union for in oceans around the world. informal and formal learning. Conservation of Nature. BY DR. SANDRA ELVIN AND BY KATE SILVER BY EMILY SOHN DR. PAUL BOYLE March 2015 | www.aza.org 1 7 13 24 Member View Departments 7 County-Wide Survey 9 Pizzazz in Print 11 By the Numbers 44 Faces & Places Yields No Trace of Rare This Vancouver Aquarium ad AZA shark and ray 47 Calendar Western Pond Turtle was one of fi ve that ran as conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharks in the Seas Around Us: How the Sea Around Us Project Is Working to Shape Our Collective Understanding of Global Shark Fisheries
    Sharks in the seas around us: How the Sea Around Us Project is working to shape our collective understanding of global shark fisheries Leah Biery1*, Maria Lourdes D. Palomares1, Lyne Morissette2, William Cheung1, Reg Watson1, Sarah Harper1, Jennifer Jacquet1, Dirk Zeller1, Daniel Pauly1 1Sea Around Us Project, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada 2UNESCO Chair in Integrated Analysis of Marine Systems. Université du Québec à Rimouski, Institut des sciences de la mer; 310, Allée des Ursulines, C.P. 3300, Rimouski, QC, G5L 3A1, Canada Report prepared for The Pew Charitable Trusts by the Sea Around Us project December 9, 2011 *Corresponding author: [email protected] Sharks in the seas around us Table of Contents FOREWORD........................................................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 SHARK BIODIVERSITY IS THREATENED ............................................................................. 10 SHARK-RELATED LEGISLATION ............................................................................................. 13 SHARK FIN TO BODY WEIGHT RATIOS ................................................................................ 14
    [Show full text]
  • Outlawing Shark Finning Throughout Global Waters Jessica Spiegel
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 24 | Issue 2 Article 8 5-1-2001 Even Jaws Deserves to Keep His Fins: Outlawing Shark Finning Throughout Global Waters Jessica Spiegel Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Admiralty Commons, Animal Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Jessica Spiegel, Even Jaws Deserves to Keep His Fins: Outlawing Shark Finning Throughout Global Waters, 24 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 409 (2001), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol24/iss2/8 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVEN JAWS DESERVES TO KEEP HIS FINS: OUTLAWING SHARK FINNING THROUGHOUT GLOBAL WATERS JESSICA SPIEGEL* Abstract: Sharks have reigned at the top of the marine food chain for 200 million years, but their recent slaughter by fishermen has imperiled their populations significantly. Unfortunately, this graceful animal is killed primarily for its fins, which are used to make shark­ fin soup, while the rest of the carcass is discarded at sea. Even worse, the shark is usually alive when finned and then left in the ocean to bleed to death or drown. There is no global shark-finning regulation in place, and only very recently has the United States implemented its own national regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shark Finning Script
    This episode is brought to you by Pool Industries at Seattle University, producer of one-of-a-kind aquariums and plankton columns, good for the lab AND the home *wink* Define the challenge (Basic introduction to the topic) Jenna Rolf: So Karyssa... Ever heard of sharks? Karyssa Miller: To be honest Jen, I’ve never seen one in real life, but I did have a plastic toy as a kid! JR: Well let me tell you - they’re pretty neat. They’re top predators, meaning that they play a very important role in marine ecosystems and have no natural predators. KM: You mean they’re more than just that scary shark in Jaws that tries to eat everyone???? JR: Exactly. It’s actually the other way around - humans are the ones that are threatening sharks. In fact, humans kill an estimated 100 million sharks every year. This mostly happens through shark finning, which is a practice that involves cutting the fin off of the shark carcass, typically for shark fin soup or medicinal practices. KM: Yeah, the entire body is not needed since shark meat is not as profitable as the fin. Shark fins can reach prices of over $300/lb, making this one of the highest priced food sources in the world JR: Shark fin soup consumption is one of the leading causes of global shark decline. Fins first appeared as a delicacy in Chinese cuisine thousands of years ago around the year 960 and were later established as a luxury food item. KM: Obviously this is not a great practice for the sharks specifically, but it also affects marine ecosystems as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Trade in Sharks
    Action Plan for North America Sustainable Trade in Sharks Commission for Environmental Cooperation Please cite as: CEC. 2017. Sustainable Trade in Sharks: Action Plan for North America. Montreal, Canada: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 56 pp. This report was prepared by Ernest W.T. Cooper and Óscar Sosa-Nishizaki, of E. Cooper Environmental Consulting, for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). The information contained herein is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of America. Reproduction of this document in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes may be made without special permission from the CEC Secretariat, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. The CEC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication or material that uses this document as a source. Except where otherwise noted, this work is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial–No Derivative Works License. © Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2017 Publication Details Publication type: Project Publication Publication date: May 2017 Original language: English Review and quality assurance procedures: Final Party review: April 2017 QA312 Project: 2015-2016/Strengthening conservation and sustainable production of selected CITES Appendix II species in North America ISBN: 978-2-89700-193-3 (e-version); 978-2-89700-194-0 (print) Disponible en français (sommaire de rapport) – ISBN:
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Regulation of Shark Finning in the United States
    EXAMINING THE REGULATION OF SHARK FINNING IN THE UNITED STATES HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE INTERIOR, ENERGY, AND ENVIRONMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION November 2, 2017 Serial No. 115–51 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://oversight.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–612 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:54 Mar 29, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\28612.TXT APRIL KING-6430 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM Trey Gowdy, South Carolina, Chairman John J. Duncan, Jr., Tennessee Elijah E. Cummings, Maryland, Ranking Darrell E. Issa, California Minority Member Jim Jordan, Ohio Carolyn B. Maloney, New York Mark Sanford, South Carolina Eleanor Holmes Norton, District of Columbia Justin Amash, Michigan Wm. Lacy Clay, Missouri Paul A. Gosar, Arizona Stephen F. Lynch, Massachusetts Scott DesJarlais, Tennessee Jim Cooper, Tennessee Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Gerald E. Connolly, Virginia Blake Farenthold, Texas Robin L. Kelly, Illinois Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Brenda L. Lawrence, Michigan Thomas Massie, Kentucky Bonnie Watson Coleman, New Jersey Mark Meadows, North Carolina Stacey E. Plaskett, Virgin Islands Ron DeSantis, Florida Val Butler Demings, Florida Dennis A.
    [Show full text]
  • Save Our Sharks: Using International Fisheries Law Within Regional Fisheries Management Organizations to Improve Shark Conservation
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 33 Issue 2 2012 Save Our Sharks: Using International Fisheries Law within Regional Fisheries Management Organizations to Improve Shark Conservation Stijn van Osch University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Animal Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law of the Sea Commons, and the Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Stijn van Osch, Save Our Sharks: Using International Fisheries Law within Regional Fisheries Management Organizations to Improve Shark Conservation, 33 MICH. J. INT'L L. 383 (2012). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol33/iss2/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT NOTE SAVE OUR SHARKS: USING INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES LAW WITHIN REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS TO IMPROVE SHARK CONSERVATION Stijn van Osch * IN TRODU CTION ............................................................................................ 384 I. B ACKGROU ND ................................................................................ 386 A. Reasons to Protect Sharks .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rick Marks, PSMFC 2015
    Marine Resources: A Washington D.C. Year in Review Rick Marks Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh PSMFC 2015 Marine Resources: A Washington DC Year in Review: Rick Marks, PSMFC 2015 • Magnuson-Stevens Act • IUU & Seafood Fraud • National Ocean Policy • Aquatic Invasive Species • Climate Change • Catch Share/Allocation • Sanctuaries, Monuments & MPAs • “Shark/Human Interactions” • Protected, Endangered Threatened Species • PSMFC “Grab Bag” • NPDES • Summer Reading tips • You heard it here! • USCG Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSFCMA) • NOAA revising NSG’s 1-3-7; Proposed Rule (6/15) • NOAA revising National Bycatch Strategy (7/15) • NOAA implementing “Prioritizing of Fish Stock Assessments” (Final Report, 8/5/15 at http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/stock- assessment/stock-assessment-prioritization; concurrently revising Stock Assessment Improvement Plan (SAIP) • NOAA issues Nat’l Habitat Policy (6/15); EFH Summit to be mediated by Fisheries Forum (5/16); • NMFS releases Regional Electronic Technology Plans (2/8/15) • NOAA/NMFS OLE rescinds 2011 AFF policy, institutes new policy effective 7/15/15 • D-Crab legislation: S.1143;H.R. 2168; House Nat Res Subcom hearing 7/23/15 positive; possible movement separate from MSFCMA reauthorization… MSA Reauthorization: House • House Natural Resources Committee moves H.R. 1335 “Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management Act” (5/29/2015) • GOMEX Red Snapper complications • House passes “clean” H.R. 1335 (vote of 225- 152; 6/1/2015) • Administration issues veto threat • OUTLOOK:
    [Show full text]