WOMBAT RESCUE TASMANIA Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WOMBAT RESCUE TASMANIA Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc WOMBAT RESCUE TASMANIA Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc. ABN 96914501942 29 January 2019 Wombat Rescue Tasmania's group response to the Senate Inquiry into the Faunal Extinction Crisis On behalf of Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc. (WRT), I wish to thank you for the opportunity to present our submission for the Senate Environment and Communications Committee Inquiry into the Faunal Extinction Crisis across Australia, and to present at the public hearing in Hobart. Our Key Concerns • Sarcoptic mange (sarcoptes scabiei) is having a widespread detrimental impact on bare­ nosed wombat populations (subspecies Vombatus Ursinus Tasmaniensis; and Vombatus ursinus ursinus on Flinders and Maria Islands) around Tasmania. • This impact is not just confined to the Naraw ntapu National Park, where there has been a documented population collapse (Martin et al.2016), or the adjacent West Tamar Region in Northern Tasmania, despite State Government claims that mange is not an issue beyond these areas. • Inadequate monitoring of wombat populations and mange preva lence, and inadequate funding towards treating mange in wild populations at the Commonwealth and State level. • Sarcoptic Mange has not been declared a notifiable disease by the Commonwealth. • Bare-nosed wombats in Tasmania may be declining rapidly before being listed as threatened or the Key Threatening Process (KTP) is enacted under the EPBC Act. • Other critical impacts are not being recognised and these may be also driving sarcoptic mange: climate change, habitat fragmentation and loss, subsequent decline in nutritional needs, overcrowding; and these are compounded by other key issues of culling and road trauma. • There is no National mange strategy. Background Our group is a grassroots, self-funded community group, based in the North and South of Tasmania, which aims to treat free-living bare-nosed wombats affected by sarcoptic mange in their natural environment throughout this state. WRT is the only group currently undertaking such a comprehensive commitment to treating mange-affected wombats in Tasmania. The burrow flap method which we use is labour intensive and does require a significant commitment by volunteers who undertake treatment of wombats that have been reported by members of the public to our Facebook page or hotline number. Our goal is to treat all identified mange cases w herever possible, to monitor for ongoing outbreaks, fund raise, create public awareness, and to encourage research into better treatments in order to Email: [email protected] prevent the continuing waves of the mange epidemic. The localised extinction that occurred at Narawntapu National Park, documented by various researchers (Martin et al. 2016; Old et al.2017)) and now in Kelso/Greens Beach in the West Tamar region highlights the urgent need for a national mange strategy. Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc. has over 90 members, and is a Registered Environmental Organization, with charity status under the ACNC. Our group was formed as a result of local community frustration with a lack of government interest, both (State and Federal), in the mange problem. In 2016, the distressing image of wombats, blinded by crusty scabs covering their eyes, with little fur as they wandered about the streets and paddocks in the day time, became a common sight for the local people of Kelso and Greens Beach in Northern Tasmania. The wombats were literally scratching themselves to death as the hard plaques scrunched their bodies, making movement difficult, and then with painful fissures appearing, secondary infections took their toll of hundreds of wombats in the area. There was no government response to treat these wombats despite the population collapse that had just occurred in the neighbouring National Park. Sarcoptic mange (sarcoptes scabiei) is caused by a parasitic mite that burrows into the epidermal layer of a wombat’s skin, causing thick plaques or scabs to form over its flanks, legs, eyes, and ears. This parasite was introduced by the first settlers and their animals and is not, therefore, an endemic species of this land (Fraser et al. 2016). The infected wombats are intensely itchy, and are seen out grazing diurnally instead of at night. They became very thirsty and have trouble trying to eat enough to maintain a healthy body weight. Thus, wombats with mange have very poor body condition with the only fur left on their bodies usually just a thin tuft along their spine. Secondary infections that result in the shutdown of bodily organs eventually kills them. Mange is an extreme animal welfare issue that would be called animal cruelty through neglect if it were a domesticated animal. The following are the Key Terms of Reference that WRT can address: a) the ongoing decline in the population and conservation status of Australia's nearly 500 threatened fauna species; WRT asserts that as Sarcoptic Mange threatens the survival, abundance and evolutionary development of wombats, it should be declared as a KTP (EDO Tasmania Report 2018). WRT believes that mange has been overlooked and neglected as a significant key threatening process that has already resulted in localised extirpations throughout Tasmania, in addition to declines noted in mainland states (National Mange Report 2018) • Researchers state that sarcoptic mange, which is highly prevalent in wombats, is the main cause of population decline (Old et al. 2017). Martin et al. (2016) argue that their research challenges the view that it is a self-limiting disease, and that it is ‘persistent and can remain as a stable chronic infectivity’ or present in a range of different ‘dynamic scenarios’. • What is the tipping point for a population collapse? Is 5 % of mange in a population too high? Researchers have noted that as mange prevalence rises, wombat abundance decreases (Martin et al. 2016, p.7), and moreover, sarcoptic mange spreads as a ‘travelling wave through a population of bare-nosed wombats’ and it is a ‘significant burden upon bare-nosed wombats (possibly also southern-hairy nosed wombats) at a national scale, which should be investigated further (Martin et al. 2016, p.6)’. 1 As we are fragmenting our wombats’ habitat ranges, it is only a matter of time for mange to completely change the viability of populations as shown by the Narawntapu /Greens Beach/Kelso experience. Often wombats are pushed into little pockets, and the ensuing overcrowding is wreaking havoc with nutritional stress and recurring mange. With the assistance of Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc. and Wombat Warriors, Kerry Finch MLC for Rosevears presented a motion to the Legislative Council of the Tasmanian Government highlighting the seriousness of the impacts of sarcoptic mange on wombat populations. That the Legislative Council: (1) Calls upon the Government to acknowledge and recognise that: (a) sarcoptic mange is having an adverse effect on wombat populations around the State; and (b) that the disease is not just an issue confined to Narawntapu National Park and the West Tamar region; (2) Urges the Government to become more involved in the fight to save the wombat population and strongly encourages the implementation of a state wide strategy for controlling the mange epidemic through a coordinated treatment plan thus reducing reliance on the efforts of community groups; and (3) In recognition of the seriousness of species extinction in Australia calls upon the Government to give urgent consideration to the creation of a separate Wildlife Environment Department or something similar so that extinction issues are not submerged below competing interests of primary industries. The motion above was passed by the Upper House on 30 October 2018. d) the adequacy of Commonwealth environment laws, including but not limited to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, in providing sufficient protections for threatened fauna and against key threatening processes; The Tasmanian Bare-nosed wombat sub species lack any adequate protection because in the eyes of the State and commonwealth Governments, it seems that they are deemed too common. Despite the documented rapid population collapse at Narawntapu N.P, and significant decline at Greens Beach and Kelso (see farmer’s signed statement), and the evidence of the numbers of treatment kits (see document) distributed widely by Wombat Rescue Tasmania in response to the community’s sightings, mange has not been declared a notifiable disease. The State Government, which would be informing the Commonwealth, maintains the argument that wombat numbers are steady, but this is based on inadequate monitoring as outlined below (see point i ). The experience of the Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour spread should highlight the need to put processes in place for other species afflicted by disease and/or parasites before reaching critical levels of decline. Wombats may decline rapidly due to mange before being classified as vulnerable under the EPBC Act. There needs to a more timely response to enact protection. 2 • Additionally, culling and the issue of crop protection permits without adequate monitoring is another factor driving wombat numbers down. In Kelso, a land owner in recent years shot dozens and dozens of wombats even though there was no crop or livestock on the land (Police were contacted by locals after shots were heard at night and deceased wombats were seen on the property). Governments have very little control over how many wombats are actually being shot, and the conditions are too lax i.e. there are often no inspections to see if there was a legitimate need for a cull permit, and the land manager, as in the case above, was warned that authorities were on their way, so was able to hide all evidence prior to the inspection. Each permit issued seems to be open ended, with up to 50 wombats able to be culled, no time restrictions and no apparent follow up to count carcasses (this is based on anecdotal reports). Note: ‘Stop the Cull’ Change.org online petition by Wombat Warriors Tasmania presented 37, 000 signatures to State Parliament in 2017.
Recommended publications
  • Lindsay Masters
    CHARACTERISATION OF EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED AND SPONTANEOUSLY OCCURRING DISEASE WITHIN CAPTIVE BRED DASYURIDS Scott Andrew Lindsay A thesis submitted in fulfillment of requirements for the postgraduate degree of Masters of Veterinary Science Faculty of Veterinary Science University of Sydney March 2014 STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY Apart from assistance acknowledged, this thesis represents the unaided work of the author. The text of this thesis contains no material previously published or written unless due reference to this material is made. This work has neither been presented nor is currently being presented for any other degree. Scott Lindsay 30 March 2014. i SUMMARY Neosporosis is a disease of worldwide distribution resulting from infection by the obligate intracellular apicomplexan protozoan parasite Neospora caninum, which is a major cause of infectious bovine abortion and a significant economic burden to the cattle industry. Definitive hosts are canid and an extensive range of identified susceptible intermediate hosts now includes native Australian species. Pilot experiments demonstrated the high disease susceptibility and the unexpected observation of rapid and prolific cyst formation in the fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata) following inoculation with N. caninum. These findings contrast those in the immunocompetent rodent models and have enormous implications for the role of the dunnart as an animal model to study the molecular host-parasite interactions contributing to cyst formation. An immunohistochemical investigation of the dunnart host cellular response to inoculation with N. caninum was undertaken to determine if a detectable alteration contributes to cyst formation, compared with the eutherian models. Selective cell labelling was observed using novel antibodies developed against Tasmanian devil proteins (CD4, CD8, IgG and IgM) as well as appropriate labelling with additional antibodies targeting T cells (CD3), B cells (CD79b, PAX5), granulocytes, and the monocyte-macrophage family (MAC387).
    [Show full text]
  • Antipredator Behaviour of Red-Necked Pademelons: a Factor Contributing to Species Survival?
    Animal Conservation (2002) 5, 325–331 © 2002 The Zoological Society of London DOI:10.1017/S1367943002004080 Printed in the United Kingdom Antipredator behaviour of red-necked pademelons: a factor contributing to species survival? Daniel T. Blumstein1,2, Janice C. Daniel1,2, Marcus R. Schnell2,3, Jodie G. Ardron2,4 and Christopher S. Evans4 1 Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evolution, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA 2 Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 4 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia (Received 15 January 2002; accepted 17 June 2002) Abstract Australian mammals have one of the world’s worst records of recent extinctions. A number of stud- ies have demonstrated that red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) have a profound effect on the population biol- ogy of some species. However, not all species exposed to fox predation have declined. We studied the antipredator behaviour of a species that has not declined – the red-necked pademelon (Thylogale thetis), and contrasted it with previous studies on a species that has declined – the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), to try to understand behavioural factors associated with survival. We focused on two antipredator behaviours: predator recognition and the way in which antipredator vigilance is influ- enced by the presence of conspecifics. We found that predator-naïve pademelons responded to the sight of certain predators, suggesting that they had some degree of innate recognition ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Platypus Collins, L.R
    AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS BIOLOGY AND CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Stephen Jackson © CSIRO 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact CSIRO PUBLISHING for all permission requests. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Jackson, Stephen M. Australian mammals: Biology and captive management Bibliography. ISBN 0 643 06635 7. 1. Mammals – Australia. 2. Captive mammals. I. Title. 599.0994 Available from CSIRO PUBLISHING 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Local call: 1300 788 000 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.publish.csiro.au Cover photos courtesy Stephen Jackson, Esther Beaton and Nick Alexander Set in Minion and Optima Cover and text design by James Kelly Typeset by Desktop Concepts Pty Ltd Printed in Australia by Ligare REFERENCES reserved. Chapter 1 – Platypus Collins, L.R. (1973) Monotremes and Marsupials: A Reference for Zoological Institutions. Smithsonian Institution Press, rights Austin, M.A. (1997) A Practical Guide to the Successful Washington. All Handrearing of Tasmanian Marsupials. Regal Publications, Collins, G.H., Whittington, R.J. & Canfield, P.J. (1986) Melbourne. Theileria ornithorhynchi Mackerras, 1959 in the platypus, 2003. Beaven, M. (1997) Hand rearing of a juvenile platypus. Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Shaw). Journal of Wildlife Proceedings of the ASZK/ARAZPA Conference. 16–20 March.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Statewide Spotlight Surveys Tasmania 2020/2021
    Annual Statewide Spotlight Surveys Tasmania 2020/2021 Regional Summary: Priority Harvested Species May 2021 Wildlife Management Department of Primary Industries Parks Water and Environment Cite as: DPIPWE (2021). Annual Statewide Spotlight Surveys, Tasmania 2020/2021. Nature Conservation Report 21/2 ISSN: 1838-7403 2020 Annual Statewide Spotlight Surveys 2 Summary The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment has been carrying out annual nocturnal spotlight surveys in Tasmania since 1975. The surveys were originally designed to monitor the harvested populations of Bennett’s wallabies, Tasmanian pademelons and brushtail possums, however all observations of wild native and non-native mammal species are recorded. Surveys are conducted by vehicle across five management regions on mainland Tasmania and also on King and Flinders Islands. Each survey route follows an existing road and is 10 km long. The results of these surveys provide a long-term time-series of data for detecting population trends. This report summarises the survey results for the three main target species, the Bennett’s wallaby, Tasmanian pademelon and the brushtail possum from the 2020 surveys. Encounter rates are also provided for a range of other species. 2020 Annual Statewide Spotlight Surveys 1 Table of Contents SUMMARY................................................................................................................................ 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Water Requirements for the Rubicon River
    Environmental Water Requirements for The Rubicon River Tom Krasnicki Aquatic Ecologist Water Assessment and Planning Branch Water Resources Division DPIWE. Report Series WRA 02/01 May, 2002. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i GLOSSARY OF TERMS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. THE RUBICON RIVER 3 2.1 General Description 4 2.1.1 Catchment and Drainage System 3 2.1.2 Geomorphology and Geology 6 2.1.3 Climate and Rainfall 7 2.1.4 Vegetation 8 2.1.5 Land Use and Degradation 9 2.1.6 Port Sorell Estuary 9 2.1.7 Hydrology 11 2.2. Site Selection 13 2.2.1 The Rubicon River at Smith and Others Rd. 13 3. VALUES 15 3.1 Community Values 15 3.2 State Technical Values 17 3.3 Endangered species 18 3.4 Values Assessed 19 4. METHODOLOGY 20 4.1 Physical Habitat Data 20 4.2 Biological Data 21 4.2.1 Invertebrates 21 4.2.2 Fish 21 4.3 Hydraulic Simulation 21 4.4 Risk Analysis 22 5. RESULTS 24 5.1 Physical Habitat Data 24 5.2 Biological Data 25 5.3 Risk Analysis 26 6. DISCUSSION 29 6.1 Vertebrate Fauna 30 6.1.1 Mordacia mordax and Geotria australis 30 6.1.2 Gadopsis marmoratus 30 6.1.3 Pseudaphritis urvillii 31 6.1.4 Galaxias truttaceus and Galaxias maculatus 31 6.1.5 Galaxias brevipinnis and Neochanna cleaveri 31 6.1.6 Prototroctes maraena 32 6.1.7 Lovettia sealii and Retropinna tasmanica 32 6.1.8 Anguilla australis 32 6.1.9 Salmo trutta 32 6.1.10 Nannoperca australis and Perca fluviatilis 33 6.2 Invertebrate Fauna 33 6.2.1 Astacopsis gouldi 33 6.3 Flow Recommendations 34 6.3.1 Rubicon River at Smith and Others Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Field Ornithologists April 2020 Newsletter
    Western Field Ornithologists April 2020 Newsletter Message from WFO President Kurt Leuschner The coronavirus pandemic is now impacting society in serious and profound ways. Every day we learn more about this virus, its toll on society, and the habits we need to practice in order to minimize its spread. As you learned from our earlier message, the WFO board decided that we must postpone our annual conference that was set to be held in September in Reno. We did this to protect the health of our members and to protect WFO from a potentially significant financial loss. We’re very disheartened that we had to cancel what was to be our 50th anniversary celebration of the founding of Western Field Ornithologists. The venue was exciting, we were organizing wonderful field trips led by stellar leaders, speakers were on tap, and we looked forward to seeing old friends and the chance to make new ones. Our annual WFO conference is a signature annual accomplishment and we are fully aware of how important this yearly event is for everyone. WFO is both a scientific and a social organization. Interacting with one another and enjoying each other’s company is a key reason many of us are part of the WFO. This newsletter and others to follow are one way we can keep the WFO community engaged and further our mission even though we may not physically see many of you again until 2021. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy the articles and updates, the artwork, the information on some of our board members, and the art and writings by several young scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Should Be Considered a Major Threatening Process Leading to Australian Fauna Declines and Extinctions
    Australia’s Faunal Extinction Crisis – Senate inquiry submission Wildlife Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne Disease should be considered a major threatening process leading to Australian fauna declines and extinctions The following submission relates specifically to Points 1, 3, 4, 8 and 9 of the Committee’s Frame of Reference. Key points: Diseases can be important threatening processes for wild animal populations, that directly cause or synergistically drive faunal declines and extinctions, with current examples in Australia (Section 1) Other factors, such as habitat degradation/destruction, chronic stress, previous declines and invasive species may contribute to the effects of disease in populations (Section 2) Known infectious diseases with population‐level effects in Australian fauna include chytrid fungus, toxoplasmosis, psittacine beak‐and‐feather disease, trypanosomes, sarcoptic mange, chlamydiosis, Koala retrovirus, mucormycosis, Pilchard herpesvirus and Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease. The level of understanding of how these diseases affect our wildlife populations varies significantly, but all desperately require further research to effectively protect affected species. Other infectious and non‐ infectious diseases may play crucial roles in the current and future decline of Australian fauna, however, there is currently insufficient baseline data and surveillance to effectively detect or address these threats and avert future extinctions (Section 3) Key actions needed to
    [Show full text]
  • The Diet of the Tasmanian Devil, Sarcoph/Lus Harris/I, As Determined from Analysis of Scat and Stomach Contents
    Papers and Proceedings ofthe Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 142(2), 2008 13 THE DIET OF THE TASMANIAN DEVIL, SARCOPH/LUS HARRIS/I, AS DETERMINED FROM ANALYSIS OF SCAT AND STOMACH CONTENTS by David Pemberton, Sam Gales, Belinda Bauer, Rosemary Gales, Billie Lazenby and Kathryn Medlock (with two text-figures, one plate and five tables) Pemberton, D., Gales, S., Bauer, B., Gales, R., Lazenby, B. & Medlock, K. 2008 (28:xi): The diet of the Tasmanian Devil, Sarcophilus harrisii, as determined from analysis of scat and stomach contents. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society a/Tasmania 142(2): 13-22. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.142.2.13 ISSN 0080-4703. Department of Primary Industries and Water, GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (DP*, RG, BL); Friends School, PO Box 42, North Hobart, Tasmania 7002, Australia (SG); Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, GPO Box 1164, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (BB, KM). * Author for correspondence. Email: [email protected] Knowledge of the diets of carnivores is an essential precursor to understanding their role as predators in ecosystems. To date, understand­ ing of the diet of Tasmanian Devils, Sarcophilus harrisii, is limited and based upon largely qualitative descriptions. We examined the diets of Tasmanian Devils at six sites by identifying undigested hair, bone and feathers found in their scats. These sites range across different habitat types in coastal and inland Tasmania, and encompass devil populations that are known as both free of the Devil Facial Tumour Disease (DFTD) and populations that are infected by the disease. Tasmanian Devil scats at coastal sites (n=27) contained ten species of mammal, as well as birds, fish and insects.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Croft & Leiper
    ASSESSMENT OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR INTERNATIONAL TOURISM BASED ON WILD KANGAROOS By David B Croft and Neil Leiper WILDLIFE TOURISM RESEARCH REPORT SERIES: NO. 17 RESEARCH REPORT SERIES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The primary aim of CRC Tourism’s research report series is technology transfer. The reports are targeted toward both industry and government users and tourism Objectives researchers. The content of this technical report series primarily focuses on applications, but may also advance research methodology and tourism theory. The report series titles relate to CRC Tourism’s research program areas. All research The first objective of this study was to identify various places in reports are peer reviewed by at least two external reviewers. For further information Australia where tourists can have direct experiences of macropods in on the report series, access the CRC website, [www.crctourism.com.au]. a natural habitat, and to assess the likely quality of such an experience. This was achieved by formal inquiry from wildlife Wildlife Tourism Report Series, Editor: Dr Karen Higginbottom researchers and managers with an interest in the kangaroo family, and This series presents research findings from projects within the Wildlife Tourism through analysis of the distribution and biology of species. This part Subprogram of the CRC. The Subprogram aims to provide strategic knowledge to of the study identified 16 important sites in New South Wales, facilitate the sustainable development of wildlife tourism in Australia. Queensland and Victoria for assessment of the feasibility of kangaroo- based tourism. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data The second objective was to review this set of sites for developing Croft, David B.
    [Show full text]
  • Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000)
    MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 Narawntapu National Park HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Narawntapu National Park Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2016 Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve - Management Plan 2016 NARAWNTAPU NATIONAL PARK HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 (Replacing the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000) This management plan replaces the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000. This management plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part 3 of the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in the Act. The term ‘Director’ refers to the Director of National Parks and Wildlife. The term ‘Park’ refers to the Narawntapu National Park. The term “Reserve” refers to the Hawley Nature Reserve. The appendices do not form part of this statutory plan, but are provided as additional information to assist in management. The draft management plan was available for public comment from 14 November 2015 until 16 December 2015. Nineteen representations were received on the draft plan, providing valuable information and recommendations for management of the Park. This input and effort is gratefully acknowledged. Approval This management plan was approved by Her Excellency the Governor-in- Council on 29 November 2016 and took effect on 21 December 2016, being seven days after publication of that approval in the Government Gazette. ISBN (book): 978-0-9925963-6-1 ISBN (PDF): 978-0-9925963-7-8 Cover image: Narawntapu National Park. Photo courtesy of Tourism Tasmania & Brian Dullaghan Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TAS 7001 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service 2016, Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2016, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • NW Key Estuaries Internal Report
    Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Establishing key estuaries and coastal waters for monitoring in the Cradle Coast NRM region Christine Crawford and Camille White Marine Research Laboratories – Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute, Nubeena Crescent, Taroona, Tasmania, 7053. Project description This is an NRM funded project being run through Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute (University of Tasmania) in Hobart for a duration of approximately 12 months. This project is an extension of past and current work on environmental condition of estuaries conducted by the Estuarine Ecology group at TAFI. It builds on a similar project “Establishment of an Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Framework for Georges Bay”. We hope to implement a similar process with estuaries and coastal waters in the Cradle Coast region, aiming to involve as many stakeholders as possible including councils, community groups, industries, state government and research institutes. TAFI Internal Report Page i Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Table of contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND OF THE CRADLE COAST REGION.........................................................................................................3 IMPORTANCE OF ESTUARIES AND COASTAL WATERS IN THE CRADLE COAST REGION.......................................................................................9 WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND ECOSYSTEM VALUES
    [Show full text]