DOCSLIB.ORG

NARAWNTAPU NATIONAL PARK, HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 (Altering the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NARAWNTAPU NATIONAL PARK, HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 (Altering the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000) 16 December 2015 Director, National Parks and Wildlife GPO Box 1751 Hobart TAS 7001 [email protected] NARAWNTAPU NATIONAL PARK, HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 (Altering the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000) Representation by BirdLife Tasmania Dear Director, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Draft Management Plan 2015. BirdLife Tasmania wishes to raise a number of concerns regarding coastal bird values of the Narawntapu National Park, and the threats to them arising from current or proposed activities, and the failure of the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Draft Management Plan 2015 to recognise explicitly high conservation values present in the Narawntapu National Park. Thank you for considering this representation Yours sincerely Dr Eric J Woehler Convenor 1. Horse-riding on Bakers Beach Hooded Plovers were listed as a Threatened Species under the EPBC Act (1999) in 2014. Horses and horse-riding on beaches were identified as threats to Hooded Plovers in the Federal Minister’s Conservation Advice (see http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/66726- conservation-advice.pdf) BirdLife Tasmania undertakes GPS mapping surveys of beach-nesting birds throughout Tasmania. Hooded Plovers nest on Bakers and Badger Beaches. A mapping survey of beach-nesting shorebirds breeding on Bakers Beach in 2014/15 located 16 breeding territories of Pied Oystercatchers and one pair of Hooded Plovers on Bakers beach. An identical survey in 2009/10 located nine and one territories, respectively. These data are publicly available in the DPIPWE NVA and Appendix 1 shows the mapped locations of breeding shorebird territories. Bakers Beach is also an important winter roosting beach for Hooded Plovers. Data from 1998 onwards show a steady decrease in the numbers of Hooded Plovers on Bakers Beach in winter months: June 1998 (46 Hooded Plovers), June 2000 (36), August 2006 (26) and August 2012 (5). As BirdLife Tasmania have no data to suggest a corresponding decrease in the breeding population on Bakers Beach or on surrounding beaches, it is likely that disturbance to roosting birds has contributed to the observed decrease. Horse riding occurs on Bakers Beach throughout the year. Horse visits to Narawntapu National Park have increased by more than 50% between 2010 – 2014, inclusive (DPIPWE data). More than 60% of horse visits of the October 2014 – September 2015 total occurred in October 2014 to March 2015 inclusive. This six-month period encompasses the breeding season for Hooded Plovers in Tasmania. Expansion of commercial horse riding on Bakers Beach in Narawntapu National Park will increase the threats to beach-nesting shorebirds, including Hooded Plover, year-round. Horse-riding on Bakers Beach will threaten nesting birds during the summer months, and roosting flocks during the winter months. The current code of practice (PWS Public Notice, Narawntapu National Park Horse Access Conditions, undated) does not protect beach-nesting shorebirds from horse-riding on beaches. Condition 3, “Horses are not permitted on Bakers Beach between 2 hours before to 2 hours after high tide” is presumably to reduce potential threats to nesting shorebirds. There is no condition requiring horses to be ridden on the wet sand. The nominated “horse trail” is simply mapped along the extent of Bakers Beach, potentially allowing horses to access the upper beach where beach-nesting shorebirds nest, lay their eggs and raise their young. BirdLife Tasmania believes that the PWS staff do not have the capacity to enforce compliance with conditions associated with horse-riding inside Narawntapu National Park. With limited staff and increased demand from visitors, BirdLife Tasmania believe that PWS staff do not have the capacity to ensure compliance by more than 500 horse visits per annum to the Narawntapu National Park. There is no evidence to support the expectation or belief that all horse riders adhere to the PWS Horse Access Conditions. Further, we believe that no monitoring of potential impacts of horse riding on beach-nesting birds occurs. This is not a criticism of PWS staff - it merely reflects staff numbers and capacity. BirdLife Tasmania opposes horse riding on all beaches in Tasmania in light of the massive threat they pose to beach-nesting birds. Since 2001, we have made multiple representations and engaged with regional PWS office staff to raise these concerns- most recently in dealing with horse-riding on Five and Seven Mile Beaches on Llanherne Peninsula east of Hobart. BirdLife Tasmania consider horses to be as destructive as 4WDs and quad bikes on sandy beaches. We do not support the concept of "co-existence" - one can have horses or successfully-breeding Hooded Plovers and other beach-nesting shorebirds, but not both. We have seen extensive disturbance to beach-nesting shorebirds from horses on beaches elsewhere in Tasmania to support our position. Recommendation 1. Given the recent listing of Hooded Plovers as Threatened under EPBC, BirdLife Tasmania urges PWS to immediately introduce a blanket ban on horses year-round on Baker Beach to protect Hooded Plovers (and other shorebird values). Recommendation 2. In addition, BirdLife Tasmania urges PWS to immediately rezone Bakers Beach from Recreation Zone to Conservation Zone, and to manage it accordingly to protect Hooded Plover (EPBC Threatened Species). 2. Rubicon Estuary Important Bird Area (IBA) An international program to identify areas of importance to birds was initiated by BirdLife International using standard, internationally-agreed and internationally-applied criteria for all area assessments. The Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) Programme identifies, monitors and protects a global network of IBAs for the conservation of the world's birds and other wildlife. Although bird faunas define each IBA in the network, the conservation and appropriate management of these areas will ensure the survival of a high number of other animal and plant species. IBAs are the sites critical to ensure the survival of viable populations of most of the world’s bird species. IBAs also support a large and representative proportion of other biodiversity, providing a holistic approach to conservation rather than the species-based approach that is more often used. IBAs overlap with Ramsar sites and their criteria for selection, but the IBA selection criteria include all species of birds not just waterbirds. Briefly, the criteria used to identify IBAs are: 1. Globally threatened species (where the site is known or thought regularly to hold significant numbers of a globally threatened species, or other species of global conservation concern), 2. Restricted-range species (where the site is known or thought to hold a significant component of a group of species whose breeding distributions are constrained, such as endemic species), 3. Biome-restricted species (where the site is known or thought to hold a significant component of the group of species whose distributions are largely or wholly confined to one biome), and 4. Congregatory species (where the site supports >1% or >20,000 individuals of congregatory species of waterbirds, seabirds or terrestrial species). To date, approximately 12,000 IBAs have been identified around the world, and they represent the largest global network of important sites for biodiversity. Full details and descriptions are available at http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/ibacritglob The identification of Australian IBAs was undertaken by BirdLife Australia and all state branches, applying the international criteria to existing survey data. Full details of the project are available at http://birdlife.org.au/projects/important-bird-areas and http://www.birdlife.org.au/projects/important-bird-areas/iba-maps for details of the Rubicon Estuary IBA. The Rubicon Estuary supports more than 1% of the world population of Pied Oystercatcher and smaller numbers of other wader species. A full description of the bird values and threats is shown in Appendix 2. With more than 1% of the world population of Pied Oystercatchers, the Rubicon Estuary is of international significance year-round for the species. Recommendation 3. BirdLife Tasmania urges PWS to immediately rezone the foreshore from Griffiths Point to Bakers Point to the park boundary at the eastern most point of NE Arm from Recreation Zone to Conservation Zone, and to manage it accordingly to protect the internationally significant High Conservation Values (Pied Oystercatcher) values present in the Rubicon Estuary IBA (Appendices 1 and 2). 3. Subtropical and temperate coastal saltmarsh A glaring and troubling omission is any reference to EPBC listed threatened vegetation community, Subtropical and temperate coastal saltmarsh that was listed as Vulnerable vegetation community on 10 Aug 2013. Details of the Conservation advice and associated information are at https://www.environment.gov.au/cgi- bin/sprat/public/publicshowcommunity.pl?id=118 Of direct relevance to the proposed Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Draft Management Plan 2015 is the following extract from Conservation Advice (http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/ threatened/communities/pubs/118-conservation-advice.pdf), pp 32-33: Tasmania Tasmania has classified its vegetation state-wide through the Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring & Mapping Program (TASVEG) (Harris and Kitchener, 2005; DPIPWE, 2013). Four
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Water Requirements for the Rubicon River
    Environmental Water Requirements for The Rubicon River Tom Krasnicki Aquatic Ecologist Water Assessment and Planning Branch Water Resources Division DPIWE. Report Series WRA 02/01 May, 2002. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i GLOSSARY OF TERMS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. THE RUBICON RIVER 3 2.1 General Description 4 2.1.1 Catchment and Drainage System 3 2.1.2 Geomorphology and Geology 6 2.1.3 Climate and Rainfall 7 2.1.4 Vegetation 8 2.1.5 Land Use and Degradation 9 2.1.6 Port Sorell Estuary 9 2.1.7 Hydrology 11 2.2. Site Selection 13 2.2.1 The Rubicon River at Smith and Others Rd. 13 3. VALUES 15 3.1 Community Values 15 3.2 State Technical Values 17 3.3 Endangered species 18 3.4 Values Assessed 19 4. METHODOLOGY 20 4.1 Physical Habitat Data 20 4.2 Biological Data 21 4.2.1 Invertebrates 21 4.2.2 Fish 21 4.3 Hydraulic Simulation 21 4.4 Risk Analysis 22 5. RESULTS 24 5.1 Physical Habitat Data 24 5.2 Biological Data 25 5.3 Risk Analysis 26 6. DISCUSSION 29 6.1 Vertebrate Fauna 30 6.1.1 Mordacia mordax and Geotria australis 30 6.1.2 Gadopsis marmoratus 30 6.1.3 Pseudaphritis urvillii 31 6.1.4 Galaxias truttaceus and Galaxias maculatus 31 6.1.5 Galaxias brevipinnis and Neochanna cleaveri 31 6.1.6 Prototroctes maraena 32 6.1.7 Lovettia sealii and Retropinna tasmanica 32 6.1.8 Anguilla australis 32 6.1.9 Salmo trutta 32 6.1.10 Nannoperca australis and Perca fluviatilis 33 6.2 Invertebrate Fauna 33 6.2.1 Astacopsis gouldi 33 6.3 Flow Recommendations 34 6.3.1 Rubicon River at Smith and Others Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Field Ornithologists April 2020 Newsletter
    Western Field Ornithologists April 2020 Newsletter Message from WFO President Kurt Leuschner The coronavirus pandemic is now impacting society in serious and profound ways. Every day we learn more about this virus, its toll on society, and the habits we need to practice in order to minimize its spread. As you learned from our earlier message, the WFO board decided that we must postpone our annual conference that was set to be held in September in Reno. We did this to protect the health of our members and to protect WFO from a potentially significant financial loss. We’re very disheartened that we had to cancel what was to be our 50th anniversary celebration of the founding of Western Field Ornithologists. The venue was exciting, we were organizing wonderful field trips led by stellar leaders, speakers were on tap, and we looked forward to seeing old friends and the chance to make new ones. Our annual WFO conference is a signature annual accomplishment and we are fully aware of how important this yearly event is for everyone. WFO is both a scientific and a social organization. Interacting with one another and enjoying each other’s company is a key reason many of us are part of the WFO. This newsletter and others to follow are one way we can keep the WFO community engaged and further our mission even though we may not physically see many of you again until 2021. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy the articles and updates, the artwork, the information on some of our board members, and the art and writings by several young scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Should Be Considered a Major Threatening Process Leading to Australian Fauna Declines and Extinctions
    Australia’s Faunal Extinction Crisis – Senate inquiry submission Wildlife Health Research Group, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne Disease should be considered a major threatening process leading to Australian fauna declines and extinctions The following submission relates specifically to Points 1, 3, 4, 8 and 9 of the Committee’s Frame of Reference. Key points: Diseases can be important threatening processes for wild animal populations, that directly cause or synergistically drive faunal declines and extinctions, with current examples in Australia (Section 1) Other factors, such as habitat degradation/destruction, chronic stress, previous declines and invasive species may contribute to the effects of disease in populations (Section 2) Known infectious diseases with population‐level effects in Australian fauna include chytrid fungus, toxoplasmosis, psittacine beak‐and‐feather disease, trypanosomes, sarcoptic mange, chlamydiosis, Koala retrovirus, mucormycosis, Pilchard herpesvirus and Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease. The level of understanding of how these diseases affect our wildlife populations varies significantly, but all desperately require further research to effectively protect affected species. Other infectious and non‐ infectious diseases may play crucial roles in the current and future decline of Australian fauna, however, there is currently insufficient baseline data and surveillance to effectively detect or address these threats and avert future extinctions (Section 3) Key actions needed to
    [Show full text]
  • Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000)
    MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 Narawntapu National Park HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Narawntapu National Park Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2016 Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve - Management Plan 2016 NARAWNTAPU NATIONAL PARK HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 (Replacing the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000) This management plan replaces the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000. This management plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part 3 of the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in the Act. The term ‘Director’ refers to the Director of National Parks and Wildlife. The term ‘Park’ refers to the Narawntapu National Park. The term “Reserve” refers to the Hawley Nature Reserve. The appendices do not form part of this statutory plan, but are provided as additional information to assist in management. The draft management plan was available for public comment from 14 November 2015 until 16 December 2015. Nineteen representations were received on the draft plan, providing valuable information and recommendations for management of the Park. This input and effort is gratefully acknowledged. Approval This management plan was approved by Her Excellency the Governor-in- Council on 29 November 2016 and took effect on 21 December 2016, being seven days after publication of that approval in the Government Gazette. ISBN (book): 978-0-9925963-6-1 ISBN (PDF): 978-0-9925963-7-8 Cover image: Narawntapu National Park. Photo courtesy of Tourism Tasmania & Brian Dullaghan Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TAS 7001 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service 2016, Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2016, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • NW Key Estuaries Internal Report
    Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Establishing key estuaries and coastal waters for monitoring in the Cradle Coast NRM region Christine Crawford and Camille White Marine Research Laboratories – Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute, Nubeena Crescent, Taroona, Tasmania, 7053. Project description This is an NRM funded project being run through Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute (University of Tasmania) in Hobart for a duration of approximately 12 months. This project is an extension of past and current work on environmental condition of estuaries conducted by the Estuarine Ecology group at TAFI. It builds on a similar project “Establishment of an Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Framework for Georges Bay”. We hope to implement a similar process with estuaries and coastal waters in the Cradle Coast region, aiming to involve as many stakeholders as possible including councils, community groups, industries, state government and research institutes. TAFI Internal Report Page i Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Table of contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND OF THE CRADLE COAST REGION.........................................................................................................3 IMPORTANCE OF ESTUARIES AND COASTAL WATERS IN THE CRADLE COAST REGION.......................................................................................9 WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND ECOSYSTEM VALUES
    [Show full text]
  • Narawntapu NATIONAL PARK
    VISITING Narawntapu NATIONAL PARK Long beaches, dunes, lagoons, small islands and the park’s many inlets and low mountain ranges offer a wide Launceston diversity of habitats for plants and animals. Whether TASMANIA Hobart you enjoy water activities, wildlife, history, bushwalking, West Greens Head Beach picnicking or camping, Narawntapu is a special place to Riv Badger er be. Narawntapu is the original Aboriginal name for the Head C721 Badger Head and West Head area. Beach Bakers Tamar Beauty Port Springlawn Point Sorell (campsites 1-4) Highlights Devonport C720 C741 Narawntapu National Park is rich in both Aboriginal C740 Beaconsfield B71 and European history and has an abundance of bird and A7 mammal life. In the evening it is a great place to see Harford wildlife. including Forester kangaroos, Bennetts wallabies o Ulverstone wombats, or even a Tasmanian devil. T B71 1 N o Launceston National parks fees apply. Parks passes are available 010 T kilometres B71 at Narawntapu National Park Visitor Centre, Tasmanian Narawntapu eter National Park o Ex Visitor Information Centres, or at Service Tasmania Shops T B72 statewide. To Deloraine To Westbury Getting there From 1 November until 30 April a section of Springlawn Situated on the central-north coast of Tasmania, the Beach is reserved for water skiing and no swimming is eastern entrance to the park is less than one hours drive allowed. Boats can be launched at Bakers Point. north-west of Launceston. To get to Badgers Beach from Launceston, take the West Tamar Highway (A7) towards There is a 26 km return trail and holding yard for Beauty Point.
    [Show full text]
  • The People, the Parks, the Loss
    Landscapes: the Journal of the International Centre for Landscape and Language Volume 5 Issue 1 En Passant Article 18 January 2012 The People, the Parks, the Loss. Adam Newcombe Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/landscapes Part of the Creative Writing Commons Recommended Citation Newcombe, A. (2012). The People, the Parks, the Loss.. Landscapes: the Journal of the International Centre for Landscape and Language, 5(1). Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/landscapes/vol5/iss1/18 This Article (refereed) is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/landscapes/vol5/iss1/18 Newcombe: The People, the Parks, the Loss. The International Centre for Landscape and Language Edith Cowan University Landscapes ISSN 1448-0778 Volume 5 Issue 1 En Passant Winter 2012 The People, the Parks, the Loss Adam Newcombe Abstract Terra nullius is a Latin expression deriving from Roman law meaning „land belonging to no one‟ or no man's land. The concept was used in international law to describe territory which has never been subject to the sovereignty of any state, or over which any prior sovereign has expressly or implicitly relinquished sovereignty. Implying an empty land, a land with no people, land as property with no owner, terra nullius is possibly the greatest legal travesty and fabrication ever enacted on an invaded people. This paper will attempt to make a little sense of what and why this has happened and the fundamental misunderstandings that underpins the state of modern Australia and the impact this continuing misunderstanding is having on indigenous and non-indigenous relationships in this country.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tasmanian Devil Breeding Program to * 6 Support Wild Recovery 7 Grueber CE1,2, Peel E1, Wright B1, Hogg CJ1, Belov K1,3
    1 AUTHORS’ ACCEPTED VERSION 2 Version of record: Grueber CE, Peel E, Wright B, Hogg CJ, Belov K (2019) A Tasmanian devil breeding 3 program to support wild recovery. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 31, 1296-1304. DOI: 4 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD18152 5 A Tasmanian devil breeding program to * 6 support wild recovery 7 Grueber CE1,2, Peel E1, Wright B1, Hogg CJ1, Belov K1,3 8 1 The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Sydney, 9 NSW 2006, Australia 10 2 San Diego Zoo Global, PO Box 120551, San Diego, CA 92112, USA 11 3 Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] 12 Word count: 5,242 (main text) + 82 references and 3 figures 13 Keywords: adaptation to captivity, conservation, insurance population, microsatellites, pedigree, 14 reproductive success, translocation, 15 * This article was written as an outcome of the Reproduction Down Under meeting held in 2017 to 16 celebrate the career of our friend and mentor Professor Marilyn Renfree. Marilyn shattered the glass 17 ceiling and paved the way for female marsupiologists in Australia. We are pleased to share the 18 Tasmanian devil story in this special issue as our tribute to the effect Marilyn has had on our careers. 19 Her impact on the field (and us) is immense. 20 Abstract 21 Tasmanian devils are threatened in the wild by devil facial tumour disease: a transmissible cancer 22 with high fatality rate. In response, the Save the Tasmanian Devil Program (STDP) established an 23 “insurance population” breeding program across Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania, 2015
    Tasmanian mammal spotting holiday 28th Nov – 11th Dec 2015 I flew from my home state of WA into Hobart and picked up the hire car and straight away headed out with great anticipation to my first site Mt Field National park – 2 nights (28th/29th Nov) Accommodation – National park hotel 300m outside park entrance, where the owners have excellent advice on numerous local platypus viewing spots. Platypus Species – Tasmanian pademelons seen on Russell falls track early morning and late afternoon. Great views of platypus 1 hour before sunset on disused railway bridge just outside of national park. The real action however starts half an hour after dark on the grassy lawn immediately inside the park boundary (opposite the visitors centre ) and included extremely numerous pademelons, common brushtail possums, Eastern barred bandicoots and Eastern quolls ( both fawn and dark morphs. ) In fact wildlife was so prolific I nearly fell over a bandicoot whilst trying to photograph a quoll! Both nights produced the same species listed above. Eastern quoll (fawn morph) Brushtail possum Pademelon Eastern quoll (dark morph) Eastern barred bandicoot An afternoon drive upto lake Dobson gave great views of Bennett’s wallaby ( red necked wallaby ) on the circular walk around the lake. Echidna spotted late afternoon at ponds near National park hotel whilst looking for platypus. Bennett’s wallaby Interestingly the Western quoll ( chuditch ) of WA are more arboreal than the Eastern quolls found in Tasmania which when pressed do not take to the trees and are therefore harder to view. This is probably an adaptation of the chuditch to the presence of the European fox in WA that is absent in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • WOMBAT RESCUE TASMANIA Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc
    WOMBAT RESCUE TASMANIA Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc. ABN 96914501942 29 January 2019 Wombat Rescue Tasmania's group response to the Senate Inquiry into the Faunal Extinction Crisis On behalf of Wombat Rescue Tasmania Inc. (WRT), I wish to thank you for the opportunity to present our submission for the Senate Environment and Communications Committee Inquiry into the Faunal Extinction Crisis across Australia, and to present at the public hearing in Hobart. Our Key Concerns • Sarcoptic mange (sarcoptes scabiei) is having a widespread detrimental impact on bare­ nosed wombat populations (subspecies Vombatus Ursinus Tasmaniensis; and Vombatus ursinus ursinus on Flinders and Maria Islands) around Tasmania. • This impact is not just confined to the Naraw ntapu National Park, where there has been a documented population collapse (Martin et al.2016), or the adjacent West Tamar Region in Northern Tasmania, despite State Government claims that mange is not an issue beyond these areas. • Inadequate monitoring of wombat populations and mange preva lence, and inadequate funding towards treating mange in wild populations at the Commonwealth and State level. • Sarcoptic Mange has not been declared a notifiable disease by the Commonwealth. • Bare-nosed wombats in Tasmania may be declining rapidly before being listed as threatened or the Key Threatening Process (KTP) is enacted under the EPBC Act. • Other critical impacts are not being recognised and these may be also driving sarcoptic mange: climate change, habitat fragmentation and loss, subsequent decline in nutritional needs, overcrowding; and these are compounded by other key issues of culling and road trauma. • There is no National mange strategy. Background Our group is a grassroots, self-funded community group, based in the North and South of Tasmania, which aims to treat free-living bare-nosed wombats affected by sarcoptic mange in their natural environment throughout this state.
    [Show full text]
  • Decline of a Traditional Roost-Site for Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria Interpres, Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis Fulv
    Australian Field Ornithology 2016, 33, 244–250 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo33244250 Moorland Point: Decline of a traditional roost-site for Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres, Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva and other shorebirds in northern Tasmania Hazel A. Britton1* and James F. Hunter2 1P.O. Box 5054, Ulverstone TAS 7315, Australia. Email: [email protected] 2P.O. Box 129, Sheffield TAS 7306, Australia. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract. The Moorland Point area has been an important high-tide roost for certain migratory shorebird species on the central-north coast of Tasmania, where shorebirds are generally scarce. Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres and Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva roost on a small rocky headland and adjacent piles of seaweed along with up to three Grey-tailed Tattlers Tringa brevipes (all mainly in summer), and Double-banded Plover Charadrius bicinctus roost above the high-tide mark 250 m to the east (mainly February–early August). More than 300 counts of shorebirds have been made at this site from 1985 to 2014. All these species have declined in recent years. Ruddy Turnstone, Pacific Golden Plover and Grey-tailed Tattler may have been affected by factors elsewhere in the East Asian–Australasian Flyway, but local disturbance is also implicated and needs further management in addition to the recent initiative to block vehicles from the beach. The situation highlights some of the problems in conserving shorebird species that favour scattered small sites and may escape the attention given to sites supporting large numbers of more social shorebirds. Introduction National surveys of shorebirds were initiated in the 1980s (Lane 1987), and these first made JH aware that Moorland Tasmania lies at the southern extremity of the East Point was an important site for the Ruddy Turnstone.
    [Show full text]