Bunolagus Monticularis)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bunolagus Monticularis) Author's personal copy BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 141 (2008) 23– 34 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Environmental change hastens the demise of the critically endangered riverine rabbit (Bunolagus monticularis) Gregory O. Hughesa,d,*, Wilfried Thuillera,e, Guy F. Midgleya,c, Kai Collinsb aKirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa bMammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa cCenter for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M Street, NW Suite 600, Washington DC 20036, USA dADAS UK Limited, Woodthorne, Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, WV6 8TQ, UK eLaboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, UMR CNRS 5553, Universite´ J. Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Declining population numbers coupled with the growing evidence of global change have Received 31 March 2005 focussed attention on the critically endangered riverine rabbit (Bunolagus monticularis) Received in revised form endemic to South Africa. The aim of this study is to develop a habitat model to aid in 14 August 2007 the identification of isolated populations, offer opportunities for re-introduction or intro- Accepted 14 August 2007 duction, and guide future conservation efforts by assessing the possible impacts of global Available online 7 November 2007 change. We attempt a novel approach where plant species which afford the riverine rabbit cover from predation and its primary food sources are modelled utilising the same tech- Keywords: nique and are included as a predictor variable in the habitat model for both current and Riverine rabbit future projections of potential habitat. Inclusion of this proximal variable as well as ripar- Habitat model ian areas yields a more parsimonious habitat model than using climatic variables alone. Global change Results suggest that unsurveyed suitable habitat east of Victoria West might harbour pre- Iand transformation viously overlooked isolated populations or offer new opportunities for re-introductions. Conservation Future climatic conditions under the most severe general circulation model for the region (HADCM3) suggest that, on average, in excess of 96% of the current habitat could become unsuitable, mitigated only slightly by a possible 7% increase in range in adjacent upper catchment areas. Consideration of existing land transformation increases this range reduc- tion by a further 1%. Given that ex situ captive breeding programmes have met with no suc- cess and that the bulk of future potential range lies well outside of the currently known and surveyed areas the current adaptation options of conservancy establishment and captive breeding need to be re-evaluated. Without positive human intervention the future of the critically endangered riverine rabbit under conditions of global change seems certain. Ó 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction breeding programmes (Dippenaar and Ferguson, 1994)have highlighted the urgent need for an evaluation of the in situ Rapidly declining numbers within known populations of the conservation of this South African endemic species. In situ critically endangered (Collins et al., 2003) riverine rabbit conservation, implies, inter alia, a detailed knowledge of the (Bunolagus monticularis) along with unsuccessful captive species’ current, potential and future range. In the case of * Corresponding author: Address: Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa. E-mail address: [email protected] (G.O. Hughes). 0006-3207/$ - see front matter Ó 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.004 Author's personal copy 24 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 141 (2008) 23– 34 the riverine rabbit this knowledge is incomplete with exhaus- 1903 (when the species was first described and was considered tive surveys of known and potential range underway yet to be wide spread) and the present, where the species is con- incomplete. While conservationists have acknowledged cli- sidered to be critically endangered (Collins et al., 2003) are mate and land-use change as a possible threat to Bunolagus attributed to a number of factors. Habitat transformation to monticularis (Ahlmann et al., 2000) these effects on remaining exploit the fertile alluvial floodplains adjacent to their riparian and future suitable habitat have not been explicitly analysed. habitat for winter wheat production heads this list, with in ex- Habitat-based models have been increasingly used as a cess of 60% of this riparian habitat having been transformed means to inform conservation (Engler et al., 2004; Lehmann (Ahlmann et al., 2000; Coetzee, 1994; Duthie, 1989; Duthie et al., 2002; Li et al., 1999; Wu and Smeins, 2000) especially and Robinson, 1990; Duthie et al., 1989). Habitat degradation in the light of continued environmental change (Arau´jo through fuel-wood collecting and overgrazing has lead to an et al., 2004; Aspinall and Matthews, 1994; Box et al., 1999; increase in predation, while the reduction in streamflow ow- Midgley et al., 2002). Of interest to this study is their ability ing to the construction of dams upstream, as well as hunting to aid in the identification of locations that might hold un- with dogs, have all played a role (Ahlmann et al., 2000). known populations (Guisan et al., 2006; Raxworthy et al., 2004), guide the introduction (Debeljak et al., 2001) or re-intro- 2.2. Distribution data duction of species (Glenz et al., 2001; Zimmermann and Bre- itenmoser, 2002) and restoration of habitats (Lehmann et al., Point distributions of known populations were compiled from 2002; Midgley et al., 2003) as well as assess the extent of future a number of surveys undertaken by conservation agencies habitat (Hilbert et al., 2004; Teixeira and Arntzen, 2002). and researchers as well as field observation. The presence re- This study aims to investigate some of the factors driving cords of a recently discovered Touws River population in the the distribution of the riverine rabbit, to delineate current Fynbos biome were excluded from this study for two reasons. suitable habitat in the hope of identifying unsurveyed areas Firstly, research to date has centred on the Karoo populations which may harbour isolated populations or offer opportuni- and observations for these may not be valid for this southerly ties for re-introduction or introduction of the species, and population e.g. food species observed for the central Karoo guide future conservation efforts by assessing the possible population do not occur in the Fynbos biome, and secondly, impacts of global change and adaptation options through genetic research suggests that this southerly population is in- the development and validation of a habitat model. deed distinct from the Karoo population (Mathee, C., Pers. Paleo-climatological research has highlighted that rapid Comm., 2005). changes in vegetation cover (over as little as 100 years) Owing to the modelling technique requiring absence data may have led to a change in faunal composition (Post, 2003). and in order not to bias the modelling with the effects of prev- The identification and inclusion of resource predictor vari- alence (Manel et al., 2001), an equal number of pseudo- ables, measured, modelled or inferred, in landscape scale absence sites were inferred using the following technique. A habitat models is not uncommon, with examples including grid of points was generated across the whole of South Africa soil hardness for burrow excavation (Calvete et al., 2004), tree in order to ensure that a complete response curve is gener- cavity availability (Lawler and Edwards, 2002), prey density ated as truncated response curves may lead to spurious (Glenz et al., 2001; Palomares et al., 2001) and potential fruit results on projection (Thuiller et al., 2004). The presence production (Pearce et al., 2001). While the dependence of spe- observations were used to create a convex polygon, which cies future ranges on vegetation under scenarios of climate by definition is the smallest convex set of points to include change have been postulated (Huntley, 1995) models of faunal all of the points. Grid points within this convex polygon were responses to climate change typically do not include the ef- excluded if they occurred within 1 km of ephemeral streams fects of proximal resource variables. In this study we attempt or occurred on terrain with a slope of less than 30%. A random a novel approach where plant species which afford the river- sub sample of the remaining grid points was chosen such that ine rabbit cover from predation and its primary food sources an equal number of absence points were selected from within are modelled utilising the same technique and are included and without the convex polygon. The final distribution used as a predictor variable in the habitat model for both current in the modelling is illustrated in Fig. 1. and future projections of potential habitat. 2.3. Ecological data 2. Materials and methods A thorough search of available literature along with field 2.1. Study species observations yielded the possible food sources on which the riverine rabbit relies as well as the plant species that it uses The riverine rabbit is a lagomorph endemic to the semi-arid for cover from predation. Field observations identified Salsola central Karoo region of the western and northern
Recommended publications
  • Behavior and Ecology of the Riparian Brush Rabbit at the San Joaquin
    BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF THE RIPARIAN BRUSH RABBIT AT THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AS DETERMINED BY CAMERA TRAPS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Stanislaus In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Ecology and Sustainability By Celia M. Tarcha May 2020 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF THE RIPARIAN BRUSH RABBIT AT THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AS DETERMINED BY CAMERA TRAPS By Celia M. Tarcha Signed Certification of Approval page is on file with the University Library Dr. Patrick A. Kelly Date Professor of Zoology Dr. Michael P. Fleming Date Associate Professor of Biology Education Dr. Marina M. Gerson Date Professor of Zoology Matthew R. Lloyd Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service © 2020 Celia M. Tarcha ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DEDICATION For my family, living and departed, who first introduced me to wildlife and appreciating inconspicuous beauty. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my committee members, Matt Lloyd, Dr. Fleming, Dr. Gerson, and Dr. Kelly, for their time and effort towards perfecting this project. I would also like to thank Eric Hopson, refuge manager of San Joaquin River National Wildlife Refuge for his insight and field support. Thank you as well to refuge biologists Fumika Takahashi and Kathryn Heffernan for their field surveys and reports. Additional thanks to Camera Bits Inc. for their donation of the Photomechanic license. I would like to thank the CSU Stanislaus Department of Biological Sciences for their help and support. Thank you to Bernadette Paul of the Endangered Species Recovery Program for her equipment management and support.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Lagomorphs Today
    HOUSE RABBIT JOURNAL The publication for members of the international House Rabbit Society Winter 2016 The State of Lagomorphs Today by Margo DeMello, PhD Make Mine Chocolate™ Turns 15 by Susan Mangold and Terri Cook Advocating For Rabbits by Iris Klimczuk Fly Strike (Myiasis) in Rabbits by Stacie Grannum, DVM $4.99 CONTENTS HOUSE RABBIT JOURNAL Winter 2016 Contributing Editors Amy Bremers Shana Abé Maureen O’Neill Nancy Montgomery Linda Cook The State of Lagomorphs Today p. 4 Sandi Martin by Margo DeMello, PhD Rebecca Clawson Designer/Editor Sandy Parshall Veterinary Review Linda Siperstein, DVM Executive Director Anne Martin, PhD Board of Directors Marinell Harriman, Founder and Chair Margo DeMello, President Mary Cotter, Vice President Joy Gioia, Treasurer Beth Woolbright, Secretary Dana Krempels Laurie Gigous Kathleen Wilsbach Dawn Sailer Bill Velasquez Judith Pierce Edie Sayeg Nancy Ainsworth House Rabbit Society is a 501c3 and its publication, House Rabbit Journal, is published at 148 Broadway, Richmond, CA 94804. Photograph by Tom Young HRJ is copyright protected and its contents may not be republished without written permission. The Bunny Who Started It All p. 7 by Nareeya Nalivka Goldie is adoptable at House Rabbit Society International Headquarters in Richmond, CA. rabbitcenter.org/adopt Make Mine Chocolate™ Turns 15 p. 8 by Susan Mangold and Terri Cook Cover photo by Sandy Parshall, HRS Program Manager Bella’s Wish p. 9 by Maurice Liang Advocating For Rabbits p. 10 by Iris Klimczuk From Grief to Grace: Maurice, Miss Bean, and Bella p. 12 by Chelsea Eng Fly Strike (Myiasis) in Rabbits p. 13 by Stacie Grannum, DVM The Transpacifi c Bunny p.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-01063 Verde Arregoitia, L
    Ecography ECOG-01063 Verde Arregoitia, L. D., Leach, K., Reid, N. and Fisher, D. O. 2015. Diversity, extinction, and threat status in Lagomorphs. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.01063 Supplementary material 1 Appendix 1 2 Paleobiogeographic summaries for all extant lagomorph genera. 3 4 Pikas – Family Ochotonidae 5 The maximum diversity and geographic extent of pikas occurred during the global climate 6 optimum from the late-Oligocene to middle-Miocene (Ge et al. 2012). When species evolve 7 and diversify at higher temperatures, opportunities for speciation and evolution of thermal 8 niches are likely through adaptive radiation in relatively colder and species poor areas 9 (Araújo et al. 2013). Extant Ochotonids may be marginal (ecologically and geographically) 10 but diverse because they occur in topographically complex areas where habitat diversity is 11 greater and landscape units are smaller (Shvarts et al. 1995). Topographical complexity 12 creates new habitat, enlarges environmental gradients, establishes barriers to dispersal, and 13 isolates populations. All these conditions can contribute to adaptation to new environmental 14 conditions and speciation in excess of extinction for terrestrial species (Badgley 2010). 15 16 Hares and rabbits - Family Leporidae 17 Pronolagus, Bunolagus, Romerolagus, Pentalagus and Nesolagus may belong to lineages 18 that were abundant and widespread in the Oligocene and subsequently lost most (if not all) 19 species. Lepus, Sylvilagus, Caprolagus and Oryctolagus represent more recent radiations 20 which lost species unevenly during the late Pleistocene. Living species in these four genera 21 display more generalist diet and habitat preferences, and are better represented in the fossil 22 record. (Lopez-Martinez 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status
    Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status PAULO C. ALVES1* AND KLAUS HACKLÄNDER2 Lagomorph taxonomy is traditionally controversy, and as a consequence the number of species varies according to different publications. Although this can be due to the conservative characteristic of some morphological and genetic traits, like general shape and number of chromosomes, the scarce knowledge on several species is probably the main reason for this controversy. Also, some species have been discovered only recently, and from others we miss any information since they have been first described (mainly in pikas). We struggled with this difficulty during the work on this book, and decide to include a list of lagomorph species (Table 1). As a reference, we used the recent list published by Hoffmann and Smith (2005) in the “Mammals of the world” (Wilson and Reeder, 2005). However, to make an updated list, we include some significant published data (Friedmann and Daly 2004) and the contribu- tions and comments of some lagomorph specialist, namely Andrew Smith, John Litvaitis, Terrence Robinson, Andrew Smith, Franz Suchentrunk, and from the Mexican lagomorph association, AMCELA. We also include sum- mary information about the geographical range of all species and the current IUCN conservation status. Inevitably, this list still contains some incorrect information. However, a permanently updated lagomorph list will be pro- vided via the World Lagomorph Society (www.worldlagomorphsociety.org). 1 CIBIO, Centro de Investigaça˜o em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos and Faculdade de Ciˆencias, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vaira˜o 4485-661 – Vaira˜o, Portugal 2 Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagomorphs: Pikas, Rabbits, and Hares of the World
    LAGOMORPHS 1709048_int_cc2015.indd 1 15/9/2017 15:59 1709048_int_cc2015.indd 2 15/9/2017 15:59 Lagomorphs Pikas, Rabbits, and Hares of the World edited by Andrew T. Smith Charlotte H. Johnston Paulo C. Alves Klaus Hackländer JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS | baltimore 1709048_int_cc2015.indd 3 15/9/2017 15:59 © 2018 Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2018 Printed in China on acid- free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www .press .jhu .edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Smith, Andrew T., 1946–, editor. Title: Lagomorphs : pikas, rabbits, and hares of the world / edited by Andrew T. Smith, Charlotte H. Johnston, Paulo C. Alves, Klaus Hackländer. Description: Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017004268| ISBN 9781421423401 (hardcover) | ISBN 1421423405 (hardcover) | ISBN 9781421423418 (electronic) | ISBN 1421423413 (electronic) Subjects: LCSH: Lagomorpha. | BISAC: SCIENCE / Life Sciences / Biology / General. | SCIENCE / Life Sciences / Zoology / Mammals. | SCIENCE / Reference. Classification: LCC QL737.L3 L35 2018 | DDC 599.32—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017004268 A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Frontispiece, top to bottom: courtesy Behzad Farahanchi, courtesy David E. Brown, and © Alessandro Calabrese. Special discounts are available for bulk purchases of this book. For more information, please contact Special Sales at 410-516-6936 or specialsales @press .jhu .edu. Johns Hopkins University Press uses environmentally friendly book materials, including recycled text paper that is composed of at least 30 percent post- consumer waste, whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013
    What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34.
    [Show full text]
  • Card 1 : What Do I Look Like? Answer: My Distinctive Black Cheek Stripe, Brown Tail, Thickly Furred Feet and Disproportionately
    Card 1 : What do I look like? Answer: My distinctive black cheek stripe, brown tail, thickly furred feet and disproportionately large ears distinguish the Riverine Rabbits from other rabbit and hare. Card 2: What do I eat? Answer: Riverine Rabbits’ diet consist of Karoo bushes (90%) and grass (10%). Some of the bushes we consume include; Bierbos, Gannabos and Skaapbos. Card 3: Where do I live? Answer: Nama Karoo Biome (primarily Northern Cape) and Succulent Karoo, Fynbos and Renosterveld Biomes in the Western Cape. Card 4: Where can you find me? Answers: Riparian habitat associated with the seasonal rivers of the Nama Karoo. However, in the Succulent Karoo we utilise the landscape more widely and may be found on hills and hang out on old lands. Card 5: How big am I? Answer: Adult male Riverine Rabbits weight an average of 1,45kg and the females can be slightly bigger with an average weight 1,7kg. We have long ears that can reach a length of up to 112mm. Card 6: How to distinguish me from other rabbit and hares? Answer: (1) I black cheek stripe along the side of the lower jaw. No other rabbits or hares has this distinctive black stripe on its cheek. (2) I have dense fur on the feet giving them a thickened appearance, referred to by the colloquial name “doekvoetjie”. Hares, on the other hand, have very slim legs. (3) I have a brown tail (similar to Red Rock Rabbits), in contrast to the black and white tails characteristic of hares. Card 7: When am I most active? Answer: Most people believe that we are only active at night (nocturnal).
    [Show full text]
  • State of Knowledge and Conservation of Endangered and Critically Endangered Lagomorphs Worldwide
    THERYA, 2015, Vol. 6 (1): 11-30 DOI: 10.12933/therya-15-225, ISSN 2007-3364 Estado del conocimiento y conservación de lagomorfos en peligro y críticamente en peligro a nivel mundial State of knowledge and conservation of endangered and critically endangered lagomorphs worldwide Consuelo Lorenzo1*, Tamara M. Rioja-Paradela2 and Arturo Carrillo-Reyes3 1El Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Unidad San Cristóbal. Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur s/n, Barrio de María Auxiliadora. San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, 29290, México. E-mail: [email protected] (CL) 2Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas. Libramiento Norte Poniente 1150, Colonia Lajas Maciel. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, 29000, México. E-mail: [email protected] (TMRP) 3Oikos: Conservación y Desarrollo Sustentable, A. C. Bugambilias 5, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, 29267, México. E-mail: [email protected] (ACR) *Corresponding author Introduction: Lagomorphs (rabbits, hares, and pikas) are widely distributed in every continent of the world, except Antarctica. They include 91 species: 31 rabbits of the genera Brachylagus, Bunolagus, Caprolagus, Nesolagus, Pentalagus, Poelagus, Prolagus, Pronolagus, Romerolagus, and Sylvilagus; 32 hares of the genus Lepus and 28 pikas of the genus Ochotona. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN 2014), the list of threatened species of lagomorphs includes one extinct, three critically endangered, ten endangered, five near threatened, five vulnerable, 61 of least concern, and six with deficient data. Although a rich diversity of lagomorphs and endemic species exists, some of the wild populations have been declining at an accelerated rate, product of human activities and climate change. In order to evaluate specific conservation actions for species at risk in the near future, the aim of this study is to determine the state of knowledge of endangered and critically endangered species and conservation proposals based on recent studies.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Keys to the Adaptive Success of European Wild Rabbit (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) in the Iberian Peninsula?
    animals Review What Are the Keys to the Adaptive Success of European Wild Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in the Iberian Peninsula? Pablo Jesús Marín-García 1,2,* and Lola Llobat 2,* 1 Institute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain 2 Department of Animal Production and Health, Veterinary Public Health and Food Science and Technology (PASAPTA), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46113 Valencia, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.J.M.-G.); [email protected] (L.L.) Simple Summary: Why might a species both be seriously threatened and pose an overpopulation problem in introduced locations? The aim of this review was to understand the keys to the adaptive success of the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in order to establish its strengths and weaknesses for the management of this keystone species in Mediterranean ecosystems. This work highlights the need to create specific conservation programs for this species. Abstract: The European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) plays an important ecological role in the ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula. Recently, rabbit populations have drastically reduced, so the species is now considered endangered. However, in some places, this animal is considered a pest. This is the conservation paradox of the 21st century: the wild rabbit is both an invasive alien and an endangered native species. The authors of this review aimed to understand the keys to the adaptive success of European rabbits, addressing all aspects of their biology in order to provide the keys to the ecological management of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of the Riverine Rabbit Bunolagus Monticularis. Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Degree
    The Ecology of the Riverine Rabbit Bunolagus monticularis. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree MSc <Zoology> In the Faculty of Science University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa. Andrew Graeme Duthie March 1989. © University of Pretoria To Dad and Mom The Ecology of the Riverine Rabbit Bunolagus monticularis. by Andrew Sraeme Duthie Supervisor : Professor J D Skinner Co-supervisor : Professor T J Robinson Mammal Research Institute Department of Zoology University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa. ABSTRACT Aspects of the ecology of B. monticularis were studied with a view to the species~ conservation. This investigation indicates that the present distribution is half that of the past distribution and that only one third of the original habitat remains uncultivated. It is estimated that this area could, theoretically, support 1435 rabbits. The shrubs, Pteronia erythrocaetha and Kochia pubescens constitute the bulk of the species~ diet; grasses are included in the diet whenever rainfall gives rise to new growth. Spatial use, social structure and activity pattern conform to the general lEporid pattern of polygamy, solitary living and nocturnality. The breeding season extends from August to May and litters of one, possibly two, altricial young are produced after a gestation of 35 - 36 days. -ii- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks and appreciation to the following people: Professor T J Robinson for initiating this project and obtaining the funding for it. For his continued enthusiasm and interest in my progress and, as co-supervisor, his considered criticism of this thesis. Professor J D Skinner for taking over the supervision of my research midway through the project and his advice and correction of this typescript.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialist Riverine Rabbit Survey
    SPECIALIST RIVERINE RABBIT SURVEY Monitoring for the presence/absence of Riverine Rabbits and the collection of data of other wildlife present on the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) site in the Karoo. Reporting on observations and recommendations for further long-term monitoring and research programme on the SKA site. Principal Client: DEA Subcontracted Services: CSIR Subcontracted Supplier: The Endangered Wildlife Trust - Drylands Conservation Programme REPORT COMPILED BY: Bonnie Schumann Esté Matthew Cobus Theron Senior Field Officer Intern Field Officer Programme Manager [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Cell: 072 122 4232 072 4626543 Cell: 079 508 2156 CONTENTS 1. Background P.2 2. Expertise of specialist P.3 3. Rationale: Riverine Rabbit conservation status and threats P.3 4. Camera trap methodology P.4 P.4 4.1 Methodology applied within Groot-Paardekloof 5. Results P.6 5.1 Absence of Riverine Rabbits P.6 5.2 Other Wildlife Present P.6 5.3 Habitat suitability P.7 6. Conservation recommendations for further long-term monitoring and research on the P.7 SKA sites 7. Conservation recommendations in Riverine Rabbit distribution areas P.8 7.1 Recommendations for baseline- and during- and post-construction monitoring in P.9 any areas should Riverine Rabbits be discovered in the future. Specific monitoring would include, but not be limited to: P.10 8. Conclusion p.11 9. Selected photos taken during the survey p.12 10. Dataset outline clarification 11. Appendices (attachments) Appendix 1- Complete photo dataset- 6 weeks Appendix 2- Mammal and bird species list Appendix 3- Plant species list Appendix 4- Google Earth map with polygons and placements Appendix 5- Camera placement photos Appendix 6- All original photos 1 1.
    [Show full text]