DOCSLIB.ORG

Livelihoods After Land Reform Namibia Country Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Livelihoods After Land Reform Namibia Country Report Land, Environment and Development Project LEGAL ASSISTANCE CenTre Livelihoods after land reform Namibia country report Wolfgang Werner Willem Odendaal Livelihoods after Land Reform: Namibia country report2010 (2010) ● 1 © Land, Environment and Development Project, Legal Assistance Centre, 2010 All rights reserved. This publication can be reproduced and distributed in whole or in part, with prior permission from and due acknowledgement of the publisher. Publisher’s contact details: 4 Körner Street, Windhoek P.O. Box 604, Windhoek, Namibia Tel. 061-223356 Fax 061-234953 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lac.org.na Printed and bound by John Meinert Printing (Pty) Ltd in Windhoek. Electronic versions of this publication and two accompanying policy briefs are posted on the LAC website (downloads free of charge). 2ISBN ● Livelihoods 978-99945-61-09-4 after land reform: Namibia country report (2010) ConTenTS Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................................... vi Section A BACKGROUND ON THE STUDY AND LAND REFORM POLICY Map of the study area ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1 InTroduCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Objectives of the study ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Research methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2 LAND reform AND poVerTY: NATIONAL polICY CONTEXT .......... 9 2.1 Rural poverty in Namibia .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 The politics of poverty and land reform ................................................................................................14 2.3 National agrarian structure and trends .................................................................................................18 2.4 Land reform and rural development policies .................................................................................... 23 2.5 Farm planning and ‘viability’ ....................................................................................................................... 23 2.5.1 Group farms .................................................................................................................................................. 23 2.5.2 Small-scale commercial farms ............................................................................................................. 25 2.6 Viability ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.7 Beneficiary elections criteria ....................................................................................................................... 37 2.8 Land acquisition and allocation ................................................................................................................. 40 2.9 Unauthorised land occupations ................................................................................................................. 44 2.10 Institutional framework governing resettlement .......................................................................... 45 2.11 Frameworks for interaction between state and civil society .................................................. 48 3 REGIONAL CONTEXTS ............................................................................................................................... 51 3.1 Hardap .........................................................................................................................................................................51 3.1.1 Land redistribution .................................................................................................................................. 53 3.2 Omaheke ....................................................................................................................................................................54 3.2.1 Land redistribution .................................................................................................................................. 55 Livelihoods after Land Reform: Namibia country report (2010) ● i Section B The ImpACTS of LAnd reform on LIVelIhoodS IN NAMIBIA 4 AffIrmATIVE ACTION LOAN SCHEME (AALS) ....................................................... 58 4.1 Characteristics of beneficiaries ....................................................................................................................58 4.1.1 Social categories of beneficiaries ....................................................................................................... 58 4.1.2 Motivation for buying a commercial farm .....................................................................................60 4.1.3 AALS farmers’ relationships with pre-settlement homes ...................................................... 62 4.2 Production systems and output types / ‘productivity’ .................................................................62 4.2.1 Production systems .................................................................................................................................. 63 4.2.2 Marketing ....................................................................................................................................................... 65 4.2.3 Diversification ..............................................................................................................................................66 4.2.4 Skills ..................................................................................................................................................................68 4.2.5 Finances .......................................................................................................................................................... 69 4.2.6 Drought .......................................................................................................................................................... 70 4.3 Typology of livelihood strategies in relation to land reform ...................................................72 4.4 Livelihood trajectories ......................................................................................................................................72 4.4.1 The ‘ideal’ trajectory ................................................................................................................................ 73 4.4.2 The ‘cyclical’ trajectory ............................................................................................................................ 75 4.4.3 The ‘part-time’ trajectory ....................................................................................................................... 77 4.4.4 The ‘broekskeur en vasbyt’ trajectory ................................................................................................80 4.5 Evaluating outcomes ..........................................................................................................................................82 5 FArm UNIT RESETTlemenT SCheme (FURS) ..........................................................85 5.1 Characteristics of beneficiaries and household composition ..................................................85 5.1.1 Social categories of beneficiaries ....................................................................................................... 85 5.1.2 Motivation for resettlement .................................................................................................................90 5.1.3 Settlers’ relationships with pre-settlement homes ................................................................... 92 5.1.4 Settlers’ social relations and networks ............................................................................................ 92 5.2 Production systems and output types / ‘productivity’ ................................................................94 5.2.1 Farm sizes and tenure ..............................................................................................................................94 5.2.2 Livestock farming ...................................................................................................................................... 95 5.2.3 Production costs and gross incomes ................................................................................................99 5.2.4 Constraints on productivity ................................................................................................................ 101 5.2.5 Marketing .....................................................................................................................................................104 5.2.6 Diversification ............................................................................................................................................106
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Washington, D.C
    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION THE HERERO PEOPLE’S REPARATIONS CORPORATION, : a District of Columbia Corporation : 1625 K Street, NW, #102 : Washington, D.C. 20006 : : THE HEREROS, : a Tribe and Ethnic and Racial Group, : by and through its Paramount Chief : By Paramount Chief Riruako : Paramount Chief K. Riruako : P.O. Box 60991 Katutura : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Mburumba Getzen Kerina : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Kurundiro Kapuuo : Case No. 01-0004447 Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Judge Jackson Calendar 2 Cornelia Tjaveondja : Next Scheduled Event: P.O. Box 24861 : Initial Scheduling Conference Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : September 18, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. Moses Nguarambuka : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Hilde Kazakoka Kamberipa : SQ66 Genesis Street : P.O. Box 61831 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Festus Korukuve : P.O. Box 50 : Opuuo (Otuzemba), Namibia : Uezuvanjo Tjihavgc : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Ujeuetu Tjihange : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Moses Katuuo : P.O. Box 930 : Gobabis, Namibia 9000 : Levy K. O. Nganjone : P.O. Box 309 : Gobabis, Namibia : Festus Ndjai : Opuuo, Namibia : Hoomajo Jjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Uelembuia Tjinawba : Okandombo : Okunene Region, Namibia : Jararaihe Tjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Hangekaoua Mbinge : Opuuo, Namibia : Ehrens Jeja : Box 210 : Omaruru : Omatjete, Namibia : Nathanael Uakumbua : Box 211 : Omaruru, Namibia : Rudolph Kauzuu : Box 210 : Omatjete : Omaruru, Namibia : 2 Jaendekua Kapika : Opuuo, Namibia : Ben Mbeuserua : P.O. Box 224 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Felix Kokati : Box 47 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Samuel Upendura : Oyinene : Omaheke Region, Namibia : Majoor Festus Kamburona : P.O. 1131 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Uetavera Tjirambi : Okonmgo : Okanene Region, Namibia : Julius Katjingisiua : P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and Poverty Alleviation : Experiences from Namibia
    Land Reform and Poverty Alleviation: Experiences from Namibia Wolfgang Werner Namibian Economic Policy Research Unit Paper presented at the Conference on 4th and 5th June 2001 1. Land reform and poverty alleviation Redistributive land reform in Namibia is widely regarded as a prerequisite for successful rural development, and hence, poverty alleviation. It is significant, however, that neither the Poverty Reduction Strategy for Namibia, which was approved by Cabinet in 1998, nor the National Poverty Reduction Action Programme 2001-2005 which is based on it, deal with the issue of land reform and poverty reduction. On the contrary, these documents leave the distinct impression that little can be expected from land redistribution in terms of poverty alleviation in the long term. According to the Poverty Reduction Strategy, ‘the agricultural base is too weak to offer a sustainable basis for prosperity’. It foresees that in ‘a quarter century from now, the large majority of the country’s inhabitants…are likely to have moved into urban centres…’ (RoN 1998a :5). A World Bank study on poverty reduction concluded that the opportunities for developing cultivation on redistributed freehold farmland seemed limited and could at best achieve a ‘one-time gain for poverty reduction’ in those few areas where cultivation was possible on land presently farmed by extensive methods (World Bank 1997: 12). The very Cabinet which approved the Poverty Reduction Strategy in 1998 was quoted as having decided at the First Cabinet Retreat in December 2000 that ‘without achieving a breakthrough in the land reform programme, the fight against poverty would not succeed’. In the same breath, it was reported that members of the Cabinet had agreed ‘unanimously…that land reform is an imperative if Namibia is to maintain its peace and political and national and racial harmony’ (New Era 22.12.2000-1.1.2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform Is Basically a Class Issue”
    This land is my land! Motions and emotions around land reform in Namibia Erika von Wietersheim 1 This study and publication was supported by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office. Copyright: FES 2021 Cover photo: Kristin Baalman/Shutterstock.com Cover design: Clara Mupopiwa-Schnack All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system without the written permission of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. First published 2008 Second extended edition 2021 Published by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office P.O. Box 23652 Windhoek Namibia ISBN 978-99916-991-0-3 Printed by John Meinert Printing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 5688 Windhoek / Namibia [email protected] 2 To all farmers in Namibia who love their land and take good care of it in honour of their ancestors and for the sake of their children 3 4 Acknowledgement I would like to thank the Friedrich-Ebert Foundation Windhoek, in particular its director Mr. Hubert Schillinger at the time of the first publication and Ms Freya Gruenhagen at the time of this extended second publication, as well as Sylvia Mundjindi, for generously supporting this study and thus making the publication of ‘This land is my land’ possible. Furthermore I thank Wolfgang Werner for adding valuable up-to-date information to this book about the development of land reform during the past 13 years. My special thanks go to all farmers who received me with an open heart and mind on their farms, patiently answered my numerous questions - and took me further with questions of their own - and those farmers and interview partners who contributed to this second edition their views on the progress of land reform until 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions in Namibia Which Changes for Whom?
    Transitions in Namibia Which Changes for Whom? Edited by Henning Melber NORDISKA AFRIKAINSTITUTET, UPPSALA 2007 Cover: The restored steam tractor outside the coastal town of Swakop- mund was made in Germany and brought to the country in 1896. It should replace ox wagons as a means of transport in the further colonization of Namibia’s interior. The 2.8 tons heavy machine in need of lots of water never managed it through the sands of the Namib desert. The local colonizers named it after the German reformer Martin Luther, who in 1521 had declared: “Here I stand – may God help me. I can not otherwise.” Today a national monument and put behind glass, Namibia’s “Martin Luther” remains an early symbol for the failure of grand visions. Indexing terms: Social change Economic change Cultural change Political development Liberation Decentralization Gender relations International relations Economic and social development Post-independence Namibia Cover photos: Henning Melber Language checking: Peter Colenbrander © The authors and Nordiska Afrikainstitutet 2007 ISBN 978-91-7106-582-7 Printed in Sweden by Elanders Gotab AB, Stockholm 2007 Table of Contents Preface ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Henning Melber Transitions in Namibia – Namibia in transition An introductory overview ………………………………………………………… 7 Christopher Saunders History and the armed struggle From anti-colonial propaganda to ‘patriotic history’? ……… 13 Phanuel Kaapama Commercial land reforms in postcolonial Namibia What happened to liberation struggle rhetoric? ………………… 29 Herbert
    [Show full text]
  • I~~I~ E a FD-992A-~N ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rte of the REPUBLIC of NAMIBIA
    Date Printed: 12/31/2008 JTS Box Number: lFES 14 Tab Number: 30 Document Title: GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA, R2,BO - NO 473, NO 25 Document Date: 1992 Document Country: NAM Document Language: ENG lFES ID: EL00103 F - B~I~~I~ E A FD-992A-~n ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rtE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA R2,80 WINDHOEK - I September 1992 No. 473 CONTENTS Page PROCLAMATION No. 25 Establishment of the boundaries of constituencies in Namibia ........ PROCLAMATION by the PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA No. 25 1992 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES IN NAMIBIA Under the powers vested in me by section 4(2)( a) of the Regional Councils Act, 1992 (Act 22 of 1992), I hereby make known the boundaries of constituencies which have been fixed by the Delimitation Commission under the provisions of Article 106(1) of the Namibian Constitution in respect of the regions referred to in Proclamation 6 of 1992. - Given under my Hand and the Seal of the RepUblic of Namibia at Windhoek this 29th day of August, One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-two. Sam Nujoma President BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT-IN-CABINET F Clifton White Resource Center International Foundation for Election Systems 2 Government Gazette I September 1992 No. 473 SCHEDULE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES REGION NO. I: KUNENE REGION compnsmg: Ruacana Constituency This Constituency is bounded on the north by the middle of the Kunene River from the said river's mouth upstream to the Ruacana Falls whence the boundary conforms with the demarcated international straight line east­ wards to Boundary Beacon 5; thence the boundary turns southwards and coincides with the straight line boundary common to the Kunene and Omusati Regions as far as line of latitude 18° S; thence along this line of latitude westwards to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the line of the coast in a general northerly direction to the mouth of the Kunene River.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform in Namibia: an Analysis of Media Coverage
    LAND REFORM IN NAMIBIA: AN ANALYSIS OF MEDIA COVERAGE By Petrus J. Engelbrecht Submitted to the graduate degree program in African and African-American Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Elizabeth MacGonagle ________________________________ Dr. Hannah Britton ________________________________ Dr. Ebenezer Obadare Date Defended: June 25, 2011 The Thesis Committee for Petrus J. Engelbrecht certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: LAND REFORM IN NAMIBIA: AN ANALYSIS OF MEDIA COVERAGE ________________________________ Chairperson Elizabeth MacGonagle Date approved: June 25, 2014 ii ABSTRACT The highly inequitable land ownership that resulted from nearly a century of colonization is an important socio-economic issue that must be overcome in order to ensure Namibia’s long-term stability and success. The media plays an important role in ensuring that land reform is successfully designed and executed. The media informs the public, sets the public and political agenda, holds the government accountable, and serves as a public sphere. This project analyses Namibia’s three primary daily newspapers’ coverage of land reform from 2003 to 2013 utilizing interpretive content analysis to determine how the papers are reporting on land reform and related themes. I then compare their portrayals to see to what they are fulfilling their roles. I find that the papers’ reporting is mostly event-driven and lacks depth and greater context. Furthermore, the papers offer a mostly one-sided view of issues. While the papers regularly reported on land reform, they generally struggle to accomplish the function that the media fulfills in a democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia's Land Redistribution Programme: a Case Study Of
    Namibia’s Land Redistribution Programme: A Case Study of Steinhausen (Okarukambe) Constituency in Omaheke Region Prisca Mandimika Student Number: 3114511 A mini-thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master in Philosophy in Land and Agrarian Studies Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS) Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences University of Western Cape (UWC) Supervisor: Professor Ruth Hall December 2020 http://etd.uwc.ac.za/ Declaration I declare that “Namibia’s Land Redistribution Programme: A Case Study of Steinhausen (Okarukambe) Constituency in Omaheke Region” is my own work. All other sources used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. This thesis has not been submitted for a degree at another university. Prisca Mandimika 9 December 2020 Signature http://etd.uwc.ac.za/ii Acknowledgements This study was completed with the guidance and support of Professor Ruth Hall whose work on land issues gave insight to my study. I equally recognise Carla Henry for all logistical and moral support and the GIZ and the Belgian Embassy for financial support. In addition, I am grateful to the Ministry of Land Reform in Namibia for authorisation and access to the study area and records. My colleagues, Ndeshihafela Nekundi, Gerson Aileka, Amalia Iithete, Marvin Sisamu and Mclesia Mbaisa, thank you for technical support and documentation. I am also indebted to Swithun, Paurai and Tanaka for technical and moral support. Lastly my profound appreciation to my father and grandfather who picked me up and reminded me of the perils of unfinished business, without whose support I would not have finished this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Omaheke Region
    Datazone level Namibian Index of MulƟ ple DeprivaƟ on 2001 Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Omaheke Report Disclaimer This Report is an independent publication commissioned by the United Nations Development Programme at the request of the Government of Republic of Namibia. The analysis and policy recommendations contained in this report however, do not necessarily re�lect the views of the Government of the Republic of Namibia or the United Nations Development Programme or its Executive Board. ISBN: 978-99916-887-8-7 Copyright UNDP, Namibia 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior permission For electronic copy and a list of any errors or omissions found as well as any updates subsequent to printing, please visit our website: http://www.undp.org.na/publications.aspx PREFACE This report is the result of collaborative work between the Government of the Republic of Namibia (GRN), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Centre for the Analysis of South African Social Policy at the Oxford Institute of Social Policy at the University of Oxford. In November 2009, the Khomas Regional Council change over the last decade could be measured requested UNDP to assist in designing an objective when the 2011 Census becomes available and criterion or set of criteria, devoid of political is subsequently used for carrying out a similar and other considerations, which the Council analysis. could use in allocating development resources. Subsequent discussions led to an agreement that This report presents, using tables, charts and other stakeholders, especially the Central Bureau digital maps, a pro�ile of multiple deprivation in of Statistics needed to be involved and that the Omaheke region at data zone level, which is a criterion or set of criteria needed to go beyond relatively new statistical geography developed income poverty considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette Republic of Namibia
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$7.20 WINDHOEK - 6 November 2019 No. 7040 CONTENTS Page PROCLAMATION No. 44 Notification of appointment of returning officers: General election for election of President and of members of National Assembly: Electoral Act, 2014 ............................................................................ 1 GOVERNMENT NOTICES No. 328 Notification of national voters’ register: General election for election of President and members of National Assembly: Electoral Act, 2014 ................................................................................................ 7 No. 329 Notification of names of candidates duly nominated for election as President: General election for election of President: Electoral Act, 2014 ............................................................................................. 12 ________________ Proclamation by the PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA No. 44 2019 NOTIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF RETURNING OFFICERS: GENERAL ELECTION FOR ELECTION OF PRESIDENT AND OF MEMBERS OF NATIONAL ASSEMBLY: ELECTORAL ACT, 2014 In terms of section 64(1)(c) of the Electoral Act, 2014 (Act No. 5 of 2014), I make known that - (a) the persons whose names are specified in Column 3 of Part A of the Schedule opposite the constituencies mentioned in Column 2 of that Part, have been appointed in terms of section 65 of that Act as returning officers; 2 Government Gazette 6 November 2019 7040 (b) the person whose name is specified in Column 3 of Part B of the Schedule, opposite the polling stations mentioned in Column 1 and Column 2 of that Part, being polling stations outside Namibia established under section 89(3) of that Act, has been appointed in terms of section 65 of that Act as returning officer, for those constituencies and polling stations at the general election for the election of the President and members of the National Assembly; and (c) I have withdrawn Proclamation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Scraping the Pot: Chapter 04
    Part II Geographical Analysis Photo: A Hai||om elder with Hai||om children in Etosha. Chapter 4: Omaheke Region 37 A note about the arrangement of the regional chapters The regional chapters (4-11) are arranged in a 'circular' pattern and according to the area of habitation of the different San language groups, thus this arrangement provides for some continuity in reporting on San groups whose cultures and traditional practices are the same or similar. Starting in Omaheke (Chapter 4), we move north-west and then east, ending in Caprivi (Chapter 11). Ohangwena precedes Omusati in this pattern because the San in Ohangwena are Hai||om and !Xun, as in Kunene, Oshana and Oshikoto. For ease of reference and navigation, these chapters are colour coded as indicated in the map below. OMUSATI OHANGWENA Angola Zambia 8 7 9 10 CAPRIVI KUNENE OSHIKOTO KAVANGO 11 BWABWATA OSHANA NATIONAL 6 PARK Etosha OTJOZONDJUPA Pan 5 OMAHEKE 4 Botswana Atlantic Ocean South Africa 38 “Scraping the Pot”: San in Namibia Two Decades After Independence Chapter 4 Omaheke Region By Erik Dirkx and Maarit Thiem Ju|’hoan women carrying firewood for domestic use in Skoonheid, Omaheke Region (Photo by Velina Ninkova) 4.1 General background Omaheke Region consists of the former Gobabis District and the former homeland/reserve areas of Aminuis, Tswanaland and part of Hereroland East. Th e borders of the region enclose an area of about 84 981 km2. Th e bordering regions are Otjozondjupa Region to the north and north-east, Khomas Region to the west and south-west, and Hardap Region to the south; to the east Omaheke borders Botswana.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gaze1=J'e. Republic of Namibia
    GOVERNMENT GAZE1=J'E. OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA R0,60 WI NDHOEK - 14 December 1992 No. 550 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 182 Administrative Directive: Certain guidelines for Government Ministers and Public Servants ........................................................ ........................................................... Government Notice OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER No. 182 1992 AD MINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE: CERTAIN GUIDELINES FOR GOVERNMENT MINISTERS AND P UBLIC SERVANTS The following Administrative Directive (No. 2 of 1992) was issued by the Right Honourable Prime Minister on 24 November 1992 to Government Ministers and Public Servants: 2 Government Gazette 14 December 1992 No. 550 Administrative Directive No. 2/1992 24 November 1992 1. Preparation of Cabinet Agenda Of late, the Prime Minister has noticed that some of the Cabinet Memoranda referred to the Cabinet Office for placement on Cabinet Agenda do not conform to the requirements set out in the Cabinet Handbook. As a result, there is marked increase in the incidence of issues referred back from the Cabinet. In order to avoid such instances, all Permanent Secretaries should - ensure that Cabinet Memoranda submitted to the Cabinet Office are prepared in conformity with the provisions set out in the Cabinet Handbook. Specifically, the Permanent Secretaries should ensure that: 1. Cabinet Memoranda are prepared after the necessary consultation with the various ministries or offices affected by or having an interest in the issues being referred to the Cabinet for decision; 2. the Memoranda are unambiguous. They must be very specific as to the Cabinet decisions being sought. This requires that the Memoranda must contain specific recommendations -- it is not sufficient merely to present a problem to the Cabinet for a decision without proposing course of action or actions; and - 3.
    [Show full text]
  • April While the Houses Were Not Complete
    11111 Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia is a service provided by Development Workshop Namibia (DWN), a newly registered Namibian NGO with a focus on sustainable urban development and poverty reduction. DWN is part of a world-wide network of Development Workshop (DW) organisations with centres in Canada, Angola and France, and offices in Vietnam and Burkino Faso. It was founded in the 1970s by three architect students in the UK and has been funded by non- governmental organisations, private citizens, and national and international development organisations. In Namibia, DWN’s activities focus on urban related research, effective urban planning for the urban poor, solutions to informal settlements, water & sanitation, and projects specifically targeting disadvantaged segments of the urban youth. Through 40 years of engagement on urban issues mainly in Africa and Asia, the DW network of organisations has acquired significant institutional knowledge and capacity and is well integrated in regional and international networks. The Namibian media provide an important source of information on urban development processes in the country, highlighting current events, opportunities and challenges. The media further provide insight into the different views and perceptions of a variety of actors, be it from government, non- government, private sector, and individuals that reside in Namibia’s towns and settlements. It is therefore hoped that DWN’s Media Monitoring service will provide insights into those different views, with potential use for a variety of institutions and decision-makers that work in the urban environment in Namibia. The Media Monitoring service is currently provided on a monthly basis and monitors the following newspapers: The Namibian, Republikein, Namibian Sun, New Era, Windhoek Observer, Confidente, and Informante.
    [Show full text]