Advocacy in Action a Guide to Influencing Decision-Making in Namibia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advocacy in Action a Guide to Influencing Decision-Making in Namibia Advocacy in Action A guide to influencing decision-making in Namibia WLR Women's Legal Rights Initiative 2004 WLR Women's Legal Rights Initiative Contract No. GEW-I-01-02-00016-00 This publication was prepared by the Legal Assistance Center in Namibia, with partial support from the Women’s Legal Rights Initiative (WLR) through a grant from USAID. WLR-Southern Africa implements projects in Swaziland, Lesotho, South Africa, and Mozambique. The Advocacy in Action manual initially developed for Namibia has also been adapted to Swaziland and Mozambique. Note: WLR is a task order under the Women in Development IQC and Chemonics is one of the holders. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ADVOCACY IN ACTION AA guideguide toto influencinginfluencing decision-makingdecision-making inin NamibiaNamibia Gender Research and Advocacy Project LEGAL ASSISTANCE CENTRE Windhoek, 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS his publication was prepared by the Legal Assistance Centre with support from the TNational Democratic Institute for International Affairs. This manual was written by Dianne Hubbard and Delia Ramsbotham of the Legal Assistance Centre. The following persons provided research for the manual: Dianne Hubbard, Legal Assistance Centre Delia Ramsbotham, Legal Assistance Centre, intern through the Young Professionals International Internship Program of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade of Canada, coordinated through the Canadian Bar Association Maria-Laure Knapp, Legal Assistance Centre, intern in a program of Youth International Internship Programme (YIIP) of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) of Canada, coordinated through Acadia University in Canada Evelyn Zimba, Legal Assistance Centre Anne Rimmer, a Development Worker funded by International Cooperation for Development (ICD) through the Catholic Institute for International Relations (CIIR). The contents of the manual were discussed at a workshop hosted by the Legal Assistance Centre and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs held on 6 November 2003. This workshop was opened by the Hon. Margie Mensah and attended by representatives of NGOs from various regions. Thanks to all those who attended and shared suggestions. We would like to thank the many government officials who took the time to answer queries and check drafts. Thanks in particular to the staff of Parliament for their assistance, specifically: Speaker’s Office at the National Assembly Deputy Secretary Mr. Harker and his staff Clerks of the Parliamentary Committees National Assembly Standing Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs National Assembly Legal Directorate Hansard Service Office of Library and Computer Services at the National Assembly. We would like to thank the staff of the following Ministries, Offices and Commissions: Office of the Attorney-General Office of the Ombudsman Law Reform and Development Commission National Planning Commission Municipality of Windhoek. We would also like to thank the following NGOs for their input: Idasa Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR) Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) NANGOF Namibia Community Radio Network The Namibian NEPRU Sister Namibia Schoolnet Women’s Action for Development (WAD). Illustrations re-printed from previous Legal Assistance Centre publications were drawn by Nicky Marais and Dudley Viall. Kind permission to re-print photographs and logos was given by: Amnesty International Legal Assistance Centre NDI Office of Library and Computer Services at the National Assembly Office of the Ombudsman Sister Namibia United Nations The layout of the manual is by Perri Caplan. Training activities associated with the Manual have been planned and coordinated by Anne Rimmer of the Legal Assistance Centre. © Legal Assistance Centre 2004 ISBN 99916-765-9-7 Legal Assistance Centre 4 Körner Street P.O. Box 604 Windhoek Tel: 061-223356 Fax: 061-234953 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lac.org.na CONTENTS Some sections of this manual give you information about how government works at different levels. You can lobby better if you are well-informed about structures and procedures. The sections which deal directly with ADVOCACY IN ACTION are listed in red. PART A: METHODS OF ADVOCACY CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 1. What is advocacy? ................................................................................................. 3 2. Advocacy aimed at government ........................................................................ 4 3. Why advocacy is important in a democracy .................................................. 5 4. Why do you need an advocacy manual? .......................................................... 8 5. Updating your advocacy manual ....................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2: PLANNING AN ADVOCACY CAMPAIGN .............................. 11 1. Resources ............................................................................................................... 11 2. Ten steps in planning an advocacy campaign ............................................. 12 STEP 1: Identify the issue .......................................................................................... 12 STEP 2: Identify other groups and individuals affected by the issue ....................... 12 STEP 3: Define your goal ........................................................................................... 12 STEP 4: Develop solutions ......................................................................................... 13 STEP 5: Build coalitions and networks ...................................................................... 14 STEP 6: Identify decision-makers .............................................................................. 15 STEP 7: Identify your advocacy strategies ................................................................ 16 STEP 8: Involve the media ......................................................................................... 16 STEP 9: Build public awareness and support ............................................................ 16 STEP 10: Evaluate the results of your campaign and consider follow-up action ..... 17 3. Approaches to advocacy .................................................................................... 21 4. Staying motivated ..................................................................................... 14 HOW TO PLAN AN ADVOCACY CAMPAIGN: AN EXAMPLE ............................................ 25 CHAPTER 3: MEETINGS WITH DECISION-MAKERS ................................ 27 1. Advantages of using personal meetings ................................................. 27 2. Arranging a meeting ................................................................................. 28 EXAMPLE OF A LETTER REQUESTING A MEETING .................................................. 29 3. Presenting your concerns effectively ..................................................... 33 CHECKLIST FOR EFFECTIVE MEETINGS ................................................................. 35 4. Follow-up action ........................................................................................ 35 EXAMPLE OF A FOLLOW-UP LETTER .................................................................... 36 CHAPTER 4: WRITING LETTERS ...................................................................................... 37 1. Benefits of letter writing campaigns ............................................................ 37 2. Picking your audience ........................................................................................ 37 3. Background information ................................................................................... 38 4. Types of letters..................................................................................................... 38 EXAMPLE OF A PERSONAL LOBBYING LETTER ............................................................. 39 EXAMPLE OF AN OPEN LOBBYING LETTER .................................................................. 40 EXAMPLE OF A PREPARED LOBBYING LETTER ............................................................. 43 EXAMPLE OF A POSTCARD CAMPAIGN ........................................................................ 44 CHAPTER 5: PETITIONS ........................................................................................................... 47 1. What is a petition? .............................................................................................. 47 2. Where to send the petition .............................................................................. 47 3. Recruiting support for a petition ................................................................... 48 4. Structure of a petition ...................................................................................... 48 EXAMPLE OF A PETITION ............................................................................................ 50 PETITION ON GENDER LAWS ....................................................................................... 51 5. Submitting a petition ......................................................................................... 52 GETTING YOUR PETITION NOTICED .............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Your Record of 2019 Election Results
    Produced by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) Issue No 1: 2020 Your Record of 2019 Election Results These results are based on a spreadsheet received from the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) on February 20 2020 with the exception that a mistake made by the ECN concerning the Windhoek Rural constituency result for the Presidential election has been corrected. The mistake, in which the votes for Independent candidate and the UDF candidate had been transposed, was spotted by the IPPR and has been acknowledged by the ECN. National Assembly Results REGION & Constituency Registered APP CDV CoD LPM NDP NEFF NPF NUDO PDM RDP RP SWANU SWAPO UDF WRP Total Votes 2019 2014 Voters Cast Turnout Turnout ZAMBEZI 45303 Judea Lyaboloma 3122 12 12 8 3 47 4 1 5 169 12 9 3 1150 5 2 1442 46.19 62.86 Kabbe North 3782 35 20 5 20 30 8 2 5 224 17 8 8 1780 14 88 2264 59.86 73.17 Kabbe South 3662 16 10 6 13 20 3 3 3 97 9 6 1 1656 4 4 1851 50.55 72.47 Katima Mulilo Rural 6351 67 26 12 25 62 12 4 6 304 26 8 7 2474 16 3 3052 48.06 84.78 Katima Mulilo Urban 13226 94 18 24 83 404 23 10 18 1410 70 42 23 5443 30 12 7704 58.25 58.55 Kongola 5198 67 35 17 21 125 10 5 5 310 32 40 17 1694 22 5 2405 46.27 65.37 Linyanti 3936 22 17 7 4 150 4 2 5 118 84 4 4 1214 12 0 1647 41.84 70.61 Sibbinda 6026 27 27 17 13 154 9 2 6 563 42 11 9 1856 27 5 2768 45.93 55.23 23133 51.06 ERONGO 113633 Arandis 7894 74 27 21 399 37 159 6 60 1329 61 326 8 2330 484 20 5341 67.66 74.97 Daures 7499 39 29 2 87 11 13 12 334 482 43 20 80 1424 1010 18 3604 54.86 61.7 Karibib 9337 78 103
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy in Primary Health Care in Namibia: Findings and Implications
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther DOI 10.1007/s10557-017-6756-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Assessing Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy in Primary Health Care in Namibia: Findings and Implications M. M. Nashilongo1 & B. Singu1 & F. Kalemeera1 & M. Mubita1 & E. Naikaku1 & A. Baker2 & A. Ferrario3 & B. Godman2,4,5 & L. Achieng6 & D. Kibuule1 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract variance. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.695. None of the 120 Introduction Namibia has the highest burden and incidence of patients had perfect adherence to antihypertensive therapy, hypertension in sub-Sahara Africa. Though non-adherence to and less than half had acceptable levels of adherence antihypertensive therapy is an important cardiovascular risk (≥ 80%). The mean adherence level was 76.7 ± 8.1%. factor, little is known about potential ways to improve adher- Three quarters of patients ever missed their scheduled ence in Namibia following universal access. The objective of clinic appointment. Having a family support system this study is to validate the Hill-Bone compliance scale and (OR = 5.4, 95% CI 1.687–27.6, p = 0.045) and attendance determine the level and predictors of adherence to antihyper- of follow-up visits (OR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–8.7, p =0.03) tensive treatment in primary health care settings in sub-urban were significant predictors of adherence. Having HIV/ townships of Windhoek, Namibia. AIDs did not lower adherence. Methods Reliability was determined by Cronbach’s alpha. Conclusions The modified Namibian version of the Hill- Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to assess con- Bone scale is reliable and valid for assessing adherence to struct validity.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambezi Landscape Profile
    1. Background information of the Zambezi Landscape 1.1 Description of the Landscape The Zambezi Focal Landscape is situated in the far eastern part of the Zambezi Region, forming a roughly square-shaped area lying immediately east of Katima Mulilo, bordered in the north by the edge of the floodplains of the Zambezi River and in the south by sections of the Chobe River. The total area of the Focal Landscape is 219,513 ha. The landscape is fairly flat and parts of it are prone to flooding during the wet season. It is characterized by clay-loam and sandy-loam soils, and rural livelihoods are based mainly on livestock, dryland cropping, and tourism and wildlife in the conservancies. The relevant features of the landscape are: The Zambezi Focal Landscape is located in several constituencies in the Zambezi Region, namely • Katima Mulilo Rural Constituency. • Kabbe North Constituency. • Kabbe South Constituency. • Sibbinda Constituency. 1.2 Ethnic Groups The Focal Landscape is mainly inhabited by the Mafwe and the Masubia people. WATS Investment cc is the Consortium responsible for overseeing the implementation of the landscape activities in this Focal Landscape. 1.3 Population and demographics The population in the Zambezi Focal Landscape has been calculated from the 2011 cen- sus data, using the NSA’s disaggregated figure for the exact area of the focal landscape (7,213 people) (NSA 2021 pers. comm.) and applying to this the annual growth rate of 1.3% for the Region (NSA 2012). This calculates to 8,207 people. In 2011 the sex ratio was roughly equal, with a very small male bias (51.9% men to 48.1% women).
    [Show full text]
  • IPPR Briefing Paper NO 44 Political Party Life in Namibia
    Institute for Public Policy Research Political Party Life in Namibia: Dominant Party with Democratic Consolidation * Briefing Paper No. 44, February 2009 By André du Pisani and William A. Lindeke Abstract This paper assesses the established dominant-party system in Namibia since independence. Despite the proliferation of parties and changes in personalities at the top, three features have structured this system: 1) the extended independence honeymoon that benefits and is sustained by the ruling SWAPO Party of Namibia, 2) the relatively effective governance of Namibia by the ruling party, and 3) the policy choices and political behaviours of both the ruling and opposition politicians. The paper was funded in part by the Danish government through Wits University in an as yet unpublished form. This version will soon be published by Praeger Publishers in the USA under Series Editor Kay Lawson. “...an emergent literature on African party systems points to low levels of party institutionalization, high levels of electoral volatility, and the revival of dominant parties.” 1 Introduction Political reform, democracy, and governance are centre stage in Africa at present. African analysts frequently point to the foreign nature of modern party systems compared to the pre-colonial political cultures that partially survive in the traditional arenas especially of rural politics. However, over the past two decades multi-party elections became the clarion call by civil society (not to mention international forces) for the reintroduction of democratic political systems. This reinvigoration of reform peaked just as Namibia gained its independence under provisions of the UN Security Council Resolution 435 (1978) and the supervision of the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG).
    [Show full text]
  • Touring Katutura! : Poverty, Tourism, and Poverty Tourism In
    Universität Potsdam Malte Steinbrink | Michael Buning | Martin Legant | Berenike Schauwinhold | Tore Süßenguth TOURING KATUTURA ! Poverty, Tourism, and Poverty Tourism in Windhoek, Namibia Potsdamer Geographische Praxis // 11 Potsdamer Geographische Praxis Potsdamer Geographische Praxis // 11 Malte Steinbrink|Michael Buning|Martin Legant| Berenike Schauwinhold |Tore Süßenguth TOURING KATUTURA! Poverty, Tourism, and Poverty Tourism in Windhoek, Namibia Universitätsverlag Potsdam Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de/ abrufbar. Universitätsverlag Potsdam 2016 http://verlag.ub.uni-potsdam.de Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam Tel.: +49 (0)331 977 2533 / Fax: -2292 E-Mail: [email protected] Die Schriftenreihe Potsdamer Geographische Praxis wird herausgegeben vom Institut für Geographie der Universität Potsdam. ISSN (print) 2194-1599 ISSN (online) 2194-1602 Das Manuskript ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Gestaltung: André Kadanik, Berlin Satz: Ute Dolezal Titelfoto: Roman Behrens Druck: docupoint GmbH Magdeburg ISBN 978-3-86956-384-8 Zugleich online veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der Universität Potsdam: URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95917 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95917 CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 11 1.1 Background of the study:
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, D.C
    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION THE HERERO PEOPLE’S REPARATIONS CORPORATION, : a District of Columbia Corporation : 1625 K Street, NW, #102 : Washington, D.C. 20006 : : THE HEREROS, : a Tribe and Ethnic and Racial Group, : by and through its Paramount Chief : By Paramount Chief Riruako : Paramount Chief K. Riruako : P.O. Box 60991 Katutura : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Mburumba Getzen Kerina : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Kurundiro Kapuuo : Case No. 01-0004447 Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Judge Jackson Calendar 2 Cornelia Tjaveondja : Next Scheduled Event: P.O. Box 24861 : Initial Scheduling Conference Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : September 18, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. Moses Nguarambuka : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Hilde Kazakoka Kamberipa : SQ66 Genesis Street : P.O. Box 61831 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Festus Korukuve : P.O. Box 50 : Opuuo (Otuzemba), Namibia : Uezuvanjo Tjihavgc : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Ujeuetu Tjihange : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Moses Katuuo : P.O. Box 930 : Gobabis, Namibia 9000 : Levy K. O. Nganjone : P.O. Box 309 : Gobabis, Namibia : Festus Ndjai : Opuuo, Namibia : Hoomajo Jjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Uelembuia Tjinawba : Okandombo : Okunene Region, Namibia : Jararaihe Tjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Hangekaoua Mbinge : Opuuo, Namibia : Ehrens Jeja : Box 210 : Omaruru : Omatjete, Namibia : Nathanael Uakumbua : Box 211 : Omaruru, Namibia : Rudolph Kauzuu : Box 210 : Omatjete : Omaruru, Namibia : 2 Jaendekua Kapika : Opuuo, Namibia : Ben Mbeuserua : P.O. Box 224 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Felix Kokati : Box 47 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Samuel Upendura : Oyinene : Omaheke Region, Namibia : Majoor Festus Kamburona : P.O. 1131 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Uetavera Tjirambi : Okonmgo : Okanene Region, Namibia : Julius Katjingisiua : P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Food Insecurity in Windhoek, Namibia
    THE STATE OF FOOD INSECURITY IN WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA Wade Pendleton, Ndeyapo Nickanor and Akiser Pomuti Pendleton, W., Nickanor, N., & Pomuti, A. (2012). The State of Food Insecurity in Windhoek, Namibia. AFSUN Food Security Series, (14). AFRICAN FOOD SECURITY URBAN NETWORK (AFSUN) AFRICAN FOOD SECURITY URBAN NETWORK (AFSUN) THE STATE OF FOOD INSECURITY IN WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA URBAN FOOD SECURITY SERIES NO. 14 AFRICAN FOOD SECURITY URBAN NETWORK (AFSUN) THE STATE OF FOOD INSECURITY IN WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA WADE PENDLETON, NDEYAPO NICKANOR AND AKISER POMUTI SERIES EDITOR: PROF. JONATHAN CRUSH URBAN FOOD SECURITY SERIES NO. 14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The financial support of the Canadian International Development Agency for AFSUN and this publication is acknowledged. Cover Photograph: Aaron Price, http://namibiaafricawwf.blogspot.com Published by African Food Security Urban Network (AFSUN) © AFSUN 2012 ISBN 978-1-920597-01-6 First published 2012 Production by Bronwen Müller, Cape Town All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or trans- mitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission from the publisher. Authors Wade Pendleton is a Research Associate of the African Food Security Urban Network. Ndeyapo Nickanor is a Lecturer at the University of Namibia. Akiser Pomuti is Director of the University Central Consultancy Bureau at the University of Namibia. Previous Publications in the AFSUN Series No 1 The Invisible Crisis: Urban Food Security in Southern Africa No 2 The State of Urban Food Insecurity in Southern Africa No
    [Show full text]
  • Migrant Windhoek: Rural–Urban Migration and Food Security in Namibia
    Urban Forum (2014) 25:191–205 DOI 10.1007/s12132-014-9220-x Migrant Windhoek: Rural–Urban Migration and Food Security in Namibia Wade Pendleton & Jonathan Crush & Ndeyapo Nickanor Published online: 18 January 2014 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The relationship between migration and food security in urban areas is an emerging area of research internationally. To date, with the exception of studies in India, Kenya, and Namibia, little attention has focused on food insecurity experienced by migrants in cities of the Global South. Building on earlier work in Namibia, this paper interrogates the relationship between migration and food security in the city of Windhoek. Windhoek has experienced significant rural–urban migration in recent years, especially since Namibia’s independence in 1990. Many migrants have settled in the northern and north-western areas of the city, primarily in the informal settlements. Most of the migrant households are poor and food insecure. In an effort to mitigate their insecure food situation, they make use of various strategies including receiving food transfers, obtaining food from informal markets, and other informal methods. This paper documents the dimensions and variations in food security amongst migrant households and examines the linkages between migration and food insecurity in a rapidly-growing African city. Keywords Migration . Food insecurity. Urbanisation . Poverty. Windhoek W. Pendleton Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cape Town, P/B Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa e-mail: [email protected] J. Crush (*) Balsillie School of International Affairs, Waterloo, ON, Canada e-mail: [email protected] J. Crush University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa N.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats
    1 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2020 Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats Votes recorded per Seats Allocation per Region Local authority area Valid votes Political Party or Organisation Party/Association Party/Association Independent Patriots for Change 283 1 Landless Peoples Movement 745 3 Aranos 1622 Popular Democratic Movement 90 1 Rally for Democracy and Progress 31 0 SWANU of Namibia 8 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 465 2 Independent Patriots for Change 38 0 Landless Peoples Movement 514 3 Gibeon 1032 Popular Democratic Movement 47 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 433 2 Independent Patriots for Change 108 1 Landless People Movement 347 3 Gochas 667 Popular Democratic Movement 65 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 147 1 Independent Patriots for Change 97 1 Landless peoples Movement 312 2 Kalkrand 698 Popular Democratic Movement 21 0 Hardap Rally for Democracy and Progress 34 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 234 2 All People’s Party 16 0 Independent Patriots for Change 40 0 Maltahöhe 1103 Landless people Movement 685 3 Popular Democratic Movement 32 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 330 2 *Results for the following Local Authorities are under review and will be released as soon as this process has been completed: Aroab, Koës, Stampriet, Otavi, Okakarara, Katima Mulilo Hardap 2 Independent Patriots for Change 180 1 Landless Peoples Movement 1726 4 Mariental 2954 Popular Democratic Movement 83 0 Republican Party of Namibia 59 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 906 2 Independent Patriots for Change 320 0 Landless Peoples Movement 2468 2 Rehoboth Independent Town
    [Show full text]
  • A74 City of Whk Annual Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABREVIATIONS 4 COUNCIL STRUCTURE 2017/18 5 OFFICE OF THE CEO 3 CITY POLICE (CIP) 51 MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 6 Theme 1: Governance 51 Public Safety and Security - Crime Rate 51 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE Public Safety and Security - Road Safety 53 OFFICER 10 Public Safety and Security - Dedicated Municipal Court 55 OVERVIEW OF WINDHOEK 14 Public Safety and Security - By-laws 55 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND POPULATION 15 City Police: Funding Secured from Central City of Windhoek Political and Government 56 Socio-Economic Profle 15 Priorities for 2018/2019 56 Population Trends and Urbanisation 16 Environmental 17 URBAN AND TRANSPORT PLANNING (UTP) 58 Poverty Levels 17 Theme 1: Financial Sustainability 58 Building Plan Approval 58 INTRODUCTION 22 Land-use Management - Town Planning STRATEGIC INTENT 22 Applications 59 Vision Statement 23 Priorities for 2018/2019 60 Mission Statement 24 Values 24 STRATEGIC FUNDING (PUBLIC TRANSPORT) 60 Strategic Objectives 24 heme 1: Financial Sustainability 60 Key Performance Areas 24 Strategic Funding ( Public Transport - Key Performance Indicators 24 Acquisition of Busses) 60 Targets 25 Theme 2: Social Progression, Economic Corporate Scorecard 25 Advancement and infrastructure Council and Management Structure 30 Development 62 Public Transportation 62 ORGANISATIONAL OVERVIEW 31 Priorities for 2019/2019 63 Local Authorities Act (Act 23, 1992) 31 Update of Laws Exercise 34 ELECTRICITY (ELE) 65 Theme 1: Financial Sustainability 65 DEPARTMENTAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 35 Strategic Funding (Electrifcation)
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice Electoral Commission of Namibia
    The Electoral Commission of Namibia herewith publishes the names of the Political Party lists of Candidates for the National Assembly elections which will be gazzetted on 7th November 2019. If any person’s name appears on a list without their consent, they can approach the Commission in writing in terms of Section 78 (2) of the Electoral Act, No. 5 of 2014. In such cases the Electoral Act of 2014 empowers the Commission to make withdrawals or removals of candidates after gazetting by publishing an amended notice. NATIONAL ASSEMBY ELECTIONS POLITICAL PARTIES CANDIDATE LIST 2019 PUBLIC NOTICE ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF NAMIBIA NOTIFICATION OF REGISTERED POLITICAL PARTIES AND LIST OF CANDIDATES FOR REGISTERED POLITICAL PARTIES: GENERAL ELECTION FOR ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF NATIONAL ASSEMBLY: ELECTORAL ACT, 2014 In terms of section 78(1) of the Electoral Act, 2014 (Act no. 5 of 2014), the public is herewith notified that for the purpose of the general election for the election of members of the National Assembly on 27 November 2019 – (a) The names of all registered political parties partaking in the general election for the election of the members of the National Assembly are set out in Schedule 1; (b) The list of candidates of each political party referred to in paragraph (a), as drawn up by the political parties and submitted in terms of section 77 of that Act for the election concerned is set out in Schedule 2; and (c) The persons whose names appear on that list referred to in paragraph (b) have been duly nominated as candidates of the political party concerned for the election.
    [Show full text]