May 2012 ERA Bulletin.Pub

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

May 2012 ERA Bulletin.Pub The ERA BULLETIN - MAY, 2012 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 55, No. 5 May, 2012 The Bulletin THIRD AVENUE’S POOR FINANCIAL CONDITION LED Published by the Electric TO ITS CAR BUILDING PROGRAM 75 YEARS AGO Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box (Continued from April, 2012 issue) 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. Cars 626-685, an improved version of the Brakes were kept applied when the treadle 100s and 300s, were the best cars that Third door was open, and could not be released For general inquiries, Avenue built. These cars weighed 37,450 until it was closed. contact us at bulletin@ pounds, slightly less than the 38,190-pound The Huffliners and the 626-685 cars were erausa.org or by phone at (212) 986-4482 (voice 300s. Operation was smooth and quiet. With equipped with a 12-volt system, which con- mail available). ERA’s four 35 horsepower 600 volt motors, their trolled the entrance and exit doors, heater website is estimated speed was more than 35 miles per contactor, passenger signal, and defroster www.erausa.org. hour. Cars were equipped with dynamic motor. A 12-volt generator under the car, belt brakes, which could retard the speed of the driven by the air compressor motor, charged Editorial Staff: Editor-in-Chief: car if the air brakes failed. the battery, which supplied the 12-volt power. Bernard Linder Third Avenue selected Brill’s 77E truck with This system was interlocked with the revers- News Editor: 27-inch wheels. This well-designed truck was er drum on the controller and operated only Randy Glucksman lightweight and simple in construction, requir- when the reverser drum was in the forward or Contributing Editor: Jeffrey Erlitz ing low maintenance and possessing good reverse position. The battery was disconnect- riding qualities. Third Avenue’s engineers ed when the car was not in service. Production Manager: modified the 77E truck by replacing steel bol- Lighting was provided by twenty 30-volt David Ross ster springs with rubber springs. This rubber- bare bulbs connected in series. If one bulb spring truck, designated as Third Avenue burned out, it short-circuited internally and Special, was as quiet as a PCC truck. The the other bulbs were slightly brighter. This company tried again to eliminate noise by was a better arrangement than the five 130- installing herringbone gears and pinions in all volt bulbs connected in series in the older ©2012 Electric cars and rubber insert wheels on cars 626- cars. If one bulb burned out, the other four Railroaders’ 645 assigned to 59th Street. These rubber bulbs were also dark and the car was Association, Incorporated insert wheels were later replaced by steel gloomy. wheels. CAR ASSIGNMENT The cars were equipped with full safety car We saw the first car, 626, on January 8, straight air brake equipment, omitting the 1939 and the last car, 685, on February 4, “dead man’s” controller handle. A self-lapping 1940. Cars 626-645 were originally equipped brake valve was housed in a spring-loaded with plows for operation on the underground In This Issue: pedal-operated mechanism. When the pedal conduit system in Manhattan. When buses Development of rose, brakes were applied and power was cut replaced the street cars in June, 1947, they the Long Island off to the motors. Brakes were released by were converted to overhead trolley operation Rail Road in the depressing the foot pedal, which served as a and transferred to the Bronx. They operated Rockaways “dead man” control and also closed the en- on the following lines: trance door. (Continued on page 4) ...Page 2 NEXT TRIP: VALLEY RAILROAD,1 SATURDAY, JUNE 2 NEW YORKERA DIVISION BULLETIN BULLETIN - MAY, OCTOBER, 2012 2000 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD IN THE ROCKAWAYS by George Chiasson FOREWORD: RESEARCH CREDIT between 1990 and 1992. AND COMMENTARY The end product, a first portion of which is hereby present- As historians in the contemporary world will inevitably ed, represents, in the author’s opinion, the best resulting text discover, a typical journey of knowledge today will generally that can be derived from this accumulation of effort. Again, start on the internet and end on the hard drive of a computer. the author owes a great debt of gratitude to those individuals This effort was and is no different, though along the way such who have graciously agreed to participate and provided in- learning requires that everything be questioned, analyzed and valuable feedback. Like any such endeavor this work does not back- (if possible, fact-) checked before any attempt is made of itself profess to be either comprehensive or definitive. It to formulate a text from the ultimate findings. With particular may ultimately be proven incorrect in whole or in part, but regard to the Long Island Rail Road, Vincent Seyfried’s seven across time appears to be the best available assemblage of -volume “Comprehensive History” has long been looked up- information and this author, as always, will gladly accept on as the ultimate source of historical information. That se- corrections, clarifications and other pertinent commentary ries was published on a privately-produced, limited basis, in for later incorporation. stages between 1961 and 1984 and is no longer available to With that: Enjoy! the reading public, unless in the context of rare book collec- THE SOUTH SIDE RAILROAD tion. This is most unfortunate for latter-day researchers who Strangely enough, the story of suburban railroad ser- seek to learn the basic historical framework of the railroad, vice to the Rockaway Peninsula originates not with that but through the beneficence of Wikipedia, Volumes 1 and 2 of long-regarded instigator of residential growth, the Long the Seyfried series (dating from 1961 and 1963, respectively) Island Rail Road, but rather with one of its competitors, are publicly available, in-full, through Wiki source. The au- the rugged little South Side Railroad. The South Side thor also expresses his sincere gratitude to various individu- waded indiscriminately into what was then a rich man’s als who were in possession of Volumes 3 through 7 and gra- game of geographic chess, using the railroad as a tool ciously consented that they be used as a resource. Neverthe- to reach the pine barrens and sand bars of Long Island, less, as has been discovered during the broad research phase mile by mile, so as to gradually transform them into well of this ongoing work, while the Vincent Seyfried series can -populated villages filled with lucrative real estate devel- indeed be considered as comprehensive as its titles suggest, opment and also to cater to the summertime crowds its interpretations can be less than definitive for certain from the city in search of sun, sand and surf. The South events. Side was incorporated in 1860 and chartered to build a The content of the adjoining text was formulated based on railway line from Brooklyn to Islip in Suffolk County, numerous information sources, most of which were ultimately rights which were expanded all the way into the Hamp- checked against the appropriate volume of the Seyfried series tons a few years later. Actual construction finally began for expansion, clarification or amplification. The effort also after the Civil War in June of 1866, and initial service includes insight from several informal web sites that are dedi- commenced from its own station in Jamaica, Queens cated to LIRR history (for example, Art Huenke’s infamous County (tucked against LIRR’s line and four blocks east “Arrt’s Arrchives”), various assemblages of private infor- of the present Jamaica complex) as far as Babylon on mation (both generally available on the internet or graciously October 28, 1867. made available to the author) and the availability of first- As its name implied the South Side struck a south- hand geographic resources (maps, atlases, etc.) that, again, eastward course from Jamaica, virtually in a straight can either be studied via internet or were obtained first hand. line to the Sunrise Highway (as it was known then and The only other previously-published research material to be now), then closely paralleled that major artery for the thoroughly scrutinized prior to creation of the main narrative remainder of its run to Babylon. The railroad established was a two-part article, “Rails to the Rockaways, Parts 1 and stops at all organized villages that then existed, with 2” by Michael Boland, which was featured in the Summer additional stations added as development (both real and Autumn, 1999 issues of the Pennsylvania Railroad Tech- and projected) progressed. Though that early list of nical & Historical Society’s periodical, The Keystone. Some names is now a bit cryptic, some of its locations never- insights were gained through companion studies of rapid theless survive to some degree into 2012: Springfield; transit evolution in Greater New York; some through a gen- Pearsall’s, since 1893 better known as Lynbrook; Rock- eral knowledge of the (more or less) present-day MTA Long ville Center; Baldwin(s); Freeport; Merrick, which was Island Rail Road that the author gained through three sum- an early short-turn point; Ridgewood (now Wantagh); mers of regular exploration and photography of the system (Continued on page 3) 2 ERA BULLETIN - MAY, 2012 Development of the Long Island Rail Road in the were installed all the way from a point west of Fresh Rockaways Pond to Pearsall’s by 1872 which facilitated passing moves. (Continued from page 2) The construction of a branch from Valley Stream to Far Rockaway was undertaken by a subsidiary known South Oyster Bay (now Massapequa); Amityville; Well- as the Far Rockaway Branch Railroad Company during wood, later Breslau and now Lindenhurst; and finally March of 1869.
Recommended publications
  • 31-Thirty Hunters Point Avenue
    31-THIRTY HUNTERS POINT AVENUE FACTORY DISTRICT / LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101 / FOR LEASE FIRST FLOOR FLOOR PLAN VAN DAM STREET 18,000 SF FEATURES: • 18,000 sf first floor (additonally 4,000 sf can be made available on the second floor) • 16’ ceiling • 1 drive-in door (can create another drive-in EXISITING DRIVE-IN or loading dock) AMENITIES: • 25’ x 30’ column spacing • Bus Line • Built in 1962 • Metro/Subway • Zone M2-1 HUNTER’S POINT AVENUE POTENTIAL LOCATION & TRANSIT: LOADING DOCK OR DRIVE-IN Subway: #7 (33rd Street Rawson stop) Buses: Q67, Q32, & Q60 bus lines 31ST PLACE Facing LIE with easy access BQE, Midtown Tunnel & 59th Street Bridge FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Commission computed and earned in accordance with the rates and conditions of our agency agreement with our MICHAEL DEUTSCH JOSEPH MEYERSON JOSEPH GROTTO JR. principal, when received from our principal, will be paid to a cooperating broker who consummates a sublease which 914 299 1302 718 512 2620 212 318 9727 is unconditionally executed and delivered by and between sublandlord and subtenant. (A copy of the rates and [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] conditions referred to above are available upon request.) 31-THIRTY HUNTERS POINT AVENUE FACTORY DISTRICT / LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101 / FOR LEASE Transit/Subway Distance 33 Street (7 Line) Transit Stop 0.7 mi Hunters Point Avenue Transit Stop 0.8 mi Queens Plaza Transit Stop (E, M, R) 0.9 mi 40 Street-Lowery Street Transit Stop (7) 0.9 mi Long Island City-Court Square Transit Stop (G) 1.0 mi Commuter Rail Distance Hunter’s Point Avenue Station Commuter Rail(Oyster Bay 0.8 mi Branch, Hempstead Branch) Woodside Station Commuter Rail (Ronkonkoma Branch,Long Beach Branch, Port Jefferson Branch, 3.6 mi Hempstead Branch, Montauk Branch, Babylon Branch) Airport Drive Distance La Guardia Airport 10 min 5.9 mi John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Front Line Personnel to Provide Quality Customer Service
    Best Foot Forward: Training Front Line Personnel to Provide Quality Customer Service NOVEMBER 2003 Katherine Brower Associate Director Ellyn Shannon Transportation Planner Karyl Berger Research Associate Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the professional and courteous customer assistance provided to them by personnel at all the transportation agencies contacted during the preparation of this report. This report has been a work in progress for many months and there are many people the authors would like to recognize for their time, assistance and perseverance in obtaining and sharing volumes of information with us. At the LIRR, special thanks go to Director of Government Affairs Janet Lewis who helped coordinate meetings and garnered the information from a variety of departments and personnel. Also at the LIRR, we would like to thank: Robert Cividanes, Donald Corkery, James Coumatos, Dr. John Diekman, Nathaniel Ham, Raymond P. Kenny, Rosanne Neville, Chris Papandreou, William E. Sellerberg and Fred Wedley. Metro-North staff were instrumental in pulling together a mountain of information and we want to acknowledge and thank: Margarita Almonte, Delana Glenn, Gus Meyers, George Okvat, Mario Riccobon, John Roberto, Mark Stoessner, Tom Tendy and Diana Tucker. The authors would also like to specially thank Lois Tendler, NYC Transit director of Government and Community Relations and Deborah Hall-Moore, Assistant director of Government and Community Relations. Without them, we would have never been able to complete this report. Also at NYC Transit, we would like to thank: Ralph Agritelley, Fred Benjamin, Rocco Cortese, Nathaniel Ford, Termaine Garden, John Gaul, Daniel Girardi, Anthony Giudice, John Grass, Kevin Hyland, Christopher Lake, Robert Newhouser, Louis Nicosia, Millard Seay, Barbara Spencer, Jennifer Sinclair and Steve Vidal.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.31.11 NYT Ironstate Harrison
    Sunday, July 31, 2011 Reviving a Tired Town By ANTOINETTE MARTIN said, “it’s possible you’ve never heard ium building called the River Park at of Harrison.” Which is why “we are Harrison, at the edge of the sprawling HARRISON - STARTING leasing next launching a major branding effort — redevelopment area, set beside the month beside the PATH station here: not just for Harrison Station, but for the river. Built by the Roseland Property 275 new rental units with an attended entire area.” Company and Millennium Homes, it lobby, a fitness center, an outdoor pool Employing the slogan “Connect sold out quickly. But by the time a sec- and volleyball court, a residents’ Here,” Harrison Station will be mar- ond building opened the following lounge, and garage parking — all keted for its exceptional transit access: year, the condominium market was tak- within walking distance of a major- steps from the PATH and from a new ing a dive. The second building eventu- league soccer stadium. parking garage; 2 to 3 minutes from ally sold out, with the help of a year- Wait a minute. Did we just say Harri- Newark, 10 minutes from Jersey City, free-mortgage offer. son? 15 from Hoboken, and less than half an Last year, a 25,000-seat stadium for Once an industrial center down on its hour from Manhattan or Newark Lib- the New York Red Bulls professional luck, Harrison in Hudson County is erty International Airport. The site is soccer team was completed across now a locus of planned redevelopment off Interstate 280 and has quick access Frank E.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2020 Update
    PTC Dashboard - LIRR and MNR (May 2020) System Software Baseline Releases PTC Safety Plan (PTCSP) Release Purpose Deadline Status RR Planned Current 3.5 MNR System Level Software (Wayside, Office, Onboard Equipment) May-19 May-19 (A) PTCSP submitted to LIRR Jun-19 Jun-19 (A) 3.5 LIRR Supports RSD on pilots and ERSD on non-pilot segments Jun-19 Jun-19 (A) LIRR submits PTCSP to the FRA Jul-19 Jul-19 (A) 3.6 LIRR Supports ERSD for non-pilot segments Oct-19 Oct-19 (A) LIRR PTCSP in review by FRA for Approval Oct-20 3.6 MNR System Release for Variance Fix (Wayside, Office) Jun-20 PTCSP submitted to MNR Jul-19 Jul-19 (A) 3.7 LIRR Supports ERSD for non-pilot segments with B2B Mar-20 Mar-20 (A) MNR submits PTCSP to the FRA Aug-19 Aug-19 (A) 3.8 LIRR HMAC and STS-STS Interface Jun-20 MNR PTCSP in review by FRA for Approval Oct-20 3.9 LIRR Operational Improvements Sep-20 Line Segments in Revenue Service Railroad Segment Planned Current MNR Tenants Interoperability date Status LIRR/3.5 Port Washington Branch (Pilot Line 2) Dec-18 Dec-18 (A) Amtrak Dec-20 LIRR/3.5 Montauk Branch - Babylon to Patchogue (Pilot Line 1) Dec-18 Dec-18 (A) CSX Dec-20 LIRR/3.5 Oyster Bay Branch Oct-19 Oct-19 (A) Providence & Worcester (P&W) Dec-20 LIRR/3.5 Hempstead Branch Oct-19 Aug-19 (A) PanAm Dec-20 LIRR/3.5 Long Beach Branch Oct-19 Oct-19 (A) Cdot Dec-20 LIRR/3.5 Far Rockaway Branch Nov-19 Oct-19 (A) LIRR TenantsInteroperability date Status Oct-20 LIRR/3.5 West Hempstead Branch Nov-19 Oct-19 (A) Amtrak (was Sep-20) LIRR/3.5 Port Jefferson Branch Nov-19 Nov-19 (A) NYAR
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Passage
    Right of Passage: Reducing Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation in the MTA Region Joshua L. Schank Transportation Planner April 2001 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 · www.pcac.org ã PCAC 2001 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the following people: Beverly Dolinsky and Mike Doyle of the PCAC staff, who provided extensive direction, input, and much needed help in researching this paper. They also helped to read and re-read several drafts, helped me to flush out arguments, and contributed in countless other ways to the final product. Stephen Dobrow of the New York City Transit Riders Council for his ideas and editorial assistance. Kate Schmidt, formerly of the PCAC staff, for some preliminary research for this paper. Barbara Spencer of New York City Transit, Christopher Boylan of the MTA, Brian Coons of Metro-North, and Yannis Takos of the Long Island Rail Road for their aid in providing data and information. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee and its component Councils–the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council, the Long Island Rail Road Commuters Council, and the New York City Transit Riders Council–are the legislatively mandated representatives of the ridership of MTA bus, subway, and commuter-rail services. Our 38 volunteer members are regular users of the MTA system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of County officials and, within New York City, of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. For more information on the PCAC and Councils, please visit our website: www.pcac.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Reexamination Report
    Town of Harrison Hudson County Master Plan Reexamination Report November 2017 Adopted December 14, 2017 Prepared by Heyer, Gruel & Associates Community Planning Consultants 236 Broad Street, Red Bank, NJ 07701 (732) 741-2900 Town of Harrison November 2017 Master Plan Reexamination Report ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Harrison Master Plan Reexamination Report 2017 Town of Harrison Hudson County, New Jersey November 2017 Adopted December 14, 2017 Prepared By: Heyer, Gruel & Associates Community Planning Consultants 236 Broad Street, Red Bank, NJ 07701 (732) 741-2900 The original of this report was signed and sealed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 45:14A-12 ____________________________________ Susan S. Gruel, P.P. #1955 ____________________________________ M. McKinley Mertz, AICP, P.P. #6368 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Heyer, Gruel & Associates 2 Town of Harrison November 2017 Master Plan Reexamination Report ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 5 PERIODIC REEXAMINATION .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 LIRR Report Card Results of the Annual, Independent Rider Survey from the Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council
    The 2000 LIRR Report Card Results of the Annual, Independent Rider Survey from the Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council Michael T. Doyle Associate Director Joshua Schank Transportation Planner October 2000 Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 • www.lirrcc.org © 2000 LIRRCC Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the members of the LIRRCC for their invaluable efforts in performing survey research in the field, and the Long Island Rail Road for its cooperation during survey activities. The authors also gratefully acknowledge technical assistance provided by former PCAC Associate Director Alan Foster. The Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council (LIRRCC) is the legislatively mandated representative of the ridership of MTA Long Island Rail Road. Our 12 volunteer members are regular users of the LIRR system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Nassau and Suffolk County Executives, and Brooklyn and Queens Borough Presidents. The Council is an affiliate of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA (PCAC). For more information, please visit our website: www.lirrcc.org. Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Methodology 3 Results for Performance Indicators 5 Systemwide Results 5 Results by Branch 10 Results for Customer Comments 17 Systemwide Results 17 Results by Branch 20 Representative Customer Comments 25 Service Delivery 25 Service Requirements 25 Scheduling 28 On-Time Performance 31 Operations 32 Maintenance of Service During Severe
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Rail Road T E a Shelter Island) Montauk D M U N S S O H Ip D C N O L A
    B r i d Cross Sound Ferry g e p o (Orient Point, LI- r t & New London, Conn) P Greenport o r North Ferry Co. t J e (Greenport-Shelter Island) f f e r s o Southold n South Ferry Co. S (North Haven- Long Island Rail Road t e a Shelter Island) Montauk d m u n s o h S i p d C n o l a . Key I s Mattituck g Amagansett o n East Hampton Full Time rail station L Peconic Port Jefferson Bridgehampton Accessible station Bay Stony Brook Part Time rail station Riverhead PORT JEFFERSON BRANCH Southampton Kings Park Major Transit Hub St. James Hampton Bays Locust Valley Northport MONTAUK BRANCH © 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Oyster Bay Glen Cove Greenlawn Smithtown SUFFOLK Westhampton Glen Street OYSTER BAY BRANCH Huntington Speonk Port Sea Cliff RONKONKOMA BRANCH Yaphank Washington Cold Spring Harbor PORT WASHINGTON BRANCH Glen Head Medford Manhas Syosset Ronkonkoma G Plandome Greenvale Mastic-Shirley r THE ea s t e NA SSAU BRONX Li Nec t Central Islip t Bellport Doug tle Nec k Roslyn Brentwood Fl N N M ush Aubu Patchogue A B B l et i Murra a asto k Albertson Hicksville Great Oakdale T s ng–M road Deer Park -W rnda ysi Davis Park T n River i y w d New Mer East Wyandanch A ll a Hi le e M Sayville Ferry Co. et in S ay i Williston W s l i neol Pinelawn Islip Poin l F H llon Westbury NH oo t loral y d B de P a Farmingdale A s t e A Carle Place Bethpage Bay Shore Sayville Ferry id QUEENS lle Par v M e Queens k s ros Service, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • IRUM Comments on Hudson Tunnel Scoping Document
    INSTITUTE FOR RATIONAL URBAN MOBILITY, INC. George Haikalis One Washington Square Village, Suite 5D President New York, NY 10012 212-475-3394 [email protected] www.irum.org November 30, 2016 Mr. RJ Palladino, Senior Program Manager Ms. Amishi Castelli NJ Transit Capital Planning Federal Railroad Administration One Penn Plaza East—8th Floor One Bowling Green, Suite 429 Newark, NJ 07105 New York, NY 10004 [email protected] [email protected] Re: Hudson Tunnel Scoping Document Dear Mr. Palladino and Ms. Castelli: The Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. (IRUM), is a NYC-based non-profit concerned with reducing motor vehicle congestion and improving the livability of dense urban places. A key IRUM effort is to make the case for transforming the three commuter rail lines serving the NY-NJ-CT metropolitan area into a coordinated regional rail system with frequent service, integrated fares, and thru-running, first at Penn Station and then by linking Penn Station with Grand Central Terminal. The Hudson Tunnel project is a key element of such an effort, and IRUM has followed the development of this project with considerable interest. IRUM submitted scoping comments on the Hudson Tunnel project in a May 17, 2016 letter to the project team, along with a lengthy attachment – The Hoboken Alternative (copies attached). 1. NJ Transit and USDOT responses to IRUM’s comments shown in the Hudson Tunnel Scoping Summary Report are deeply flawed. On Page 31 of the Scoping Summary Report, the Hoboken Alternative is wrongly dismissed as follows: “An alternative that passes near the Hoboken Terminal, would be substantially longer (with proportionally greater cost) than alternatives that go more directly between the NEC alignment near Secaucus and PSNY.” This is simply wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoboken Alternative
    The New ARC Hudson River Passenger Rail Tunnels: The Hoboken Alternative December 1, 2009 Prepared by George Haikalis President, Institute for Rational Urban Mobility One Washington Square Village, Suite 5D New York, NY 10012 212-475-3394 [email protected] www.irum.org Why via Hoboken? year time frame in the current plan, before any additional trains can be Routing the new Access to the handled across the Hudson. Region’s Core (ARC) Hudson River passenger rail tunnels by way of Other Important benefits of the Hoboken Terminal – the Hoboken Hoboken Alternative Alternative – allows existing rail infrastructure to be used more Significant environmental gains would productively. When combined with be realized as well. Since the Hoboken “Penn Station First” -- a simpler and Alternative routes trains over existing more direct Penn Station connection in underutilized tracks and bridges Manhattan -- the Hoboken Alternative through the Hackensack holds the promise of reducing Meadowlands, no wetlands would be construction cost of the new tunnels destroyed. A less costly construction and its essential related component -- scheme will greatly reduce the the Portal Bridge Capacity Expansion project’s carbon footprint as well. The project -- by more than $8 billion or route better serves the waterfront, 70% of the total $11.4 billion cost. providing motorists with a more attractive alternative and reducing Even in good times this option merits congestion which is at critical serious consideration, but in light of levels. the growing economic difficulties facing New Jersey and New York it is Routing the new tunnels by way of extremely important to give fair and Hoboken offers significant savings in impartial consideration to credible operating cost, while providing a much options.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2018 Amendment CPRB
    SubmittedInterior_April2018_CapProg_Ex SummFEB_2018 4/23/18 12:16 PM Page 1 MTA Capital Program 2015–2019 Renew. Enhance. Expand. CAPITAL PROGRAM Amendment No. 3 mta.info/capital As Submitted to the Capital Program Review Board April 2018 1 18 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Overview……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Program Evolution and Proposed Changes ……………………..………………………………………………..………..…………….… 24 Investment Summary……………………………………………………………………..………..……………………………….………………… 25 Program Funding……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…………..…… 26 MTA Core……………………………………….……………………………………………….……………………………………………... 29 MTA New York City Transit……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 29 MTA Long Island Rail Road………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 MTA Metro-North Railroad…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 63 MTA Bus Company……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 75 MTA Interagency…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 79 MTA Network Expansion……………………………………………………………….………………………..……………………….. 85 MTA Bridges and Tunnels……………………………………………………….………………………………………………...…….. 97 Project Listings………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………...……… 107 MTA New York City Transit…………………....…………………………………….……………………………………………………………………….. 111 MTA Long Island Rail Road……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………… 135 MTA Metro-North Railroad……………………………………………………………………………………………..……..….….….….….…… 143 MTA Bus Company…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….….….
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey State Data Center Division of Economic & Demographic Research P.O
    AFFILIATE AGENCY PUBLICATION LIST 2018 STATE OF NEW JERSEY PHIL MURPHY, GOVERNOR SHEILA OLIVER, LT. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO, COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY STATE DATA CENTER DIVISION OF ECONOMIC & DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH P.O. BOX 388 TRENTON, NJ 08625-0388 JUNE 2018 Intentionally Left Blank NEW JERSEY STATE DATA CENTER NETWORK AFFILIATE PUBLICATION LIST 2018 Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS ADVANCE & RUTGERS REPORT _______________________________________________________________ 1 ATLANTIC COUNTY ________________________________________________________________________ 4 BERGEN COUNTY _________________________________________________________________________ 7 BURLINGTON COUNTY ______________________________________________________________________ 8 CAPE MAY COUNTY _______________________________________________________________________ 9 CUMBERLAND COUNTY ____________________________________________________________________ 10 ESSEX COUNTY __________________________________________________________________________ 14 GLOUCESTER COUNTY ____________________________________________________________________ 15 HUDSON COUNTY ________________________________________________________________________ 16 HUNTERDON COUNTY _____________________________________________________________________ 17 MERCER COUNTY ________________________________________________________________________ 20 MIDDLESEX COUNTY ______________________________________________________________________ 21 MONMOUTH COUNTY ______________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]