The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK Eleventh Report of Session 2010–12 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 7 February 2012 Published on 19 February 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliament.uk/ecc. The Reports of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in a printed volume. Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Sarah Hartwell-Naguib (Clerk), Dr Richard Benwell (Second Clerk), Dr Michael H. O’Brien (Committee Specialist), Jenny Bird (Committee Specialist), Francene Graham (Senior Committee Assistant), Jonathan Olivier Wright (Committee Assistant), Julie Evans (Committee Support Assistant) and Nick Davies (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Energy and Climate Change Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2569; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] List of additional written evidence 1 Innovation and Policy Group, University of Edinburgh Ev w1 2 Parsons Brinckerhoff Ev w8 3 Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society Ev w12 4 Seabed User and Developer Group Ev w14 5 Shawater Ltd Ev w16 6 The European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) Limited Ev w20 7 Atlantis Resources Corporation Ev w24 8 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Ev w29 9 Pulse Group Holdings Ltd Ev w32 10 Highlands and Islands Enterprise Ev w35 11 Marine Energy Group, University of Edinburgh Ev w39 12 Trident Energy Ev w43 13 Alstom Ev w45 14 Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Ev w49 15 Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology Ev w 52 16 The Scottish Government, Energy Directorate, Offshore Renewables Ev w54, Ev w57 17 RWE Npower Renewables Limited Ev w58 18 Wave Hub Ev w61 19 Wildlife Trusts Ev w66 20 Campaign to Protect Rural England Ev w68 21 Countryside Council for Wales Ev w69 22 Low Carbon Developers Ev w73 23 Hales Energy Ltd Ev w78 24 Peel Energy Limited Ev w81 25 Tyndall Centre Ev w83 26 Renewable Energy Association's Ocean Energy Group Ev w85 27 Engineering the Future Alliance Ev w91 28 National Renewable Energy Centre NAREC Ev w97 29 ScottishPower Ev w100 30 SSE Ev w102 31 AWS Ocean Energy Ltd Ev w107 32 Welsh Government Ev w111 33 Northern Ireland Executive Ev w113 34 JWG Consulting Ltd Ev w119 35 Jeremy Baster Ev w122 cobber Pack: U PL: CWE1 [SO] Processed: [14-02-2012 16:41] Job: 018161 Unit: PG01 Energy and Climate Change Committee: Evidence Ev w1 Written evidence Memorandum submitted by University of Edinburgh: Innovation and Policy group for marine renewables It is important to clarify here that the term “marine renewables” is taken to encompass only the wave and tidal stream energy sectors. Other energy conversion technologies such as tidal barrage, offshore wind, and ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) will not be considered in this response. 1. What are the potential benefits that marine renewables could bring to the UK and should Government be supporting the development of these particular technologies? If the right facilitating policies are put in place, the benefits that marine renewables could bring to the UK are threefold: — Emissions reductions; — Increased security of supply; and — Economic benefits including job creation and inward investment. The benefits from emissions reductions and increased security of supply are principally benefits from marine renewable energy deployments in the UK, irrespective of where the supply chain is developed. In comparison to this, the economic benefits are principally benefits from developing the sector and the supply chain in the UK. Emissions reductions and Increased security of supply: The UK has committed to a legally binding target of achieving 80% emissions reductions (1990 baseline) by 2050.1 In addition, the EU Renewable Energy Directive2 sets the UK a legally binding target of producing 15% of UK energy consumption from renewable sources by 2020. Both of these targets are highly ambitious and will require a swift and efficient transition to low carbon energy sources. The Carbon Trust estimate that, with devices currently under development, the wave energy sector in the UK could practically and economically capture around 50 TWh/yr and the tidal stream sector around 20 TWh/ yr. Combined, the two sectors could therefore capture a maximum of 70 TWh/yr,3 around 20% of current UK electricity demand which was 379 TWh in 2009.4 Achieving the UK’s ambitious target of 80% emissions reductions by 2050 whilst the overall electricity demand is projected to rise over the same period (to an estimated 600 TWh/yr),5 illustrates the fundamental changes in the emissions intensity of the electricity sector which will be required. A wide and diverse range of low carbon technologies will be required if the targets are to be met, and marine renewables could make a large contribution. There are a myriad of different scenarios for how the UK’s growing demand and ambitious emissions reduction targets could be met. One such scenario, under which all low carbon technologies are accelerated, is shown in figure 1 below which illustrates the large potential role for the marine energy sector, contributing in excess of 70GW of installed capacity by 2050. 1 UK Climate Change Act (2008). 2 Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament (23 April 2009). 3 Carbon Trust (2011) Accelerating Marine Energy report. 4 DUKES (2011)—Chapter 5, electricity. 5 Elders et al. (2005) Electricity Network Scenarios for Great Britain in 2050. cobber Pack: U PL: CWE1 [E] Processed: [14-02-2012 16:41] Job: 018161 Unit: PG01 Ev w2 Energy and Climate Change Committee: Evidence Figure 1 GRAPH SHOWING THE CONTRIBUTION THAT MARINE RENEWABLES COULD MAKE IN THE UK IN 2050 UNDER A SCENARIO IN WHICH 80% EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS ARE ACHIEVED BY 2050 AND IN WHICH ALL LOW CARBON TECHNOLOGIES ARE ACCELERATED Installed capacity (GW) 120 Storage Hydro 100 Oil Solar PV 80 Nuclear Marine 60 Gas CCS GW Imports Gas 40 Blowaste & others Coal CCS 20 Wind Coal 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Source: UKERC 2050 Project). As can be seen in figure 2 below, UK electricity generation is highly dependent on generation types such as gas. In 2010, ~38% of the natural gas used in the UK was imported,6 illustrative of how exposed the UK electricity generation is to price volatilities which are largely controlled by factors outside of the UK. The above estimate that the marine renewables sector could contribute 70 TWh/yr7 to the UK electricity system is in excess of the contribution that nuclear energy made to the UK net electricity supplied in 2010. Clearly the scale of this potential contribution is significant to the UK’s energy security as marine renewables exploit a completely domestic resource. Figure 2 GRAPH SHOWING THE BREAKDOWN BY FUEL INPUT OF THE UK NET ELECTRICITY SUPPLIED IN 2010 Other Fuels Renewables 1% 7% Imports 1% Coal 28% Nuclear Gas 16% 47% (Source: DUKES 2011). Economic benefits: The Carbon Trust estimate that the global market for marine energy could be worth up to £460 billion in the period 2010–50, reaching up to £40 billion/year by 2050. They estimate that around 75% of this is potentially accessible to UK based businesses, and that the UK (given present strengths) could capture ~£76 6 DUKES (2011)—Chapter 4, natural gas. 7 Carbon Trust (2011) Accelerating Marine Energy report. cobber Pack: U PL: CWE1 [O] Processed: [14-02-2012 16:41] Job: 018161 Unit: PG01 Energy and Climate Change Committee: Evidence Ev w3 billion (22%) of this accessible market, contributing ~£15 billion to UK GDP over 2010–50 and potentially creating over 68,000 UK jobs by 2050. It is important to highlight that a substantial portion of these UK jobs (over 70%) are estimated to be generated by exports, both within Europe and beyond.8 Should government be supporting the development of these particular technologies? At present, the UK is seen as the world leader in marine renewables, and many of the leading technologies and companies in the sector are located in the UK. This is largely due to the support which the UK government has provided to the sector.
Recommended publications
  • Identification of Pressures and Impacts Arising Frm Strategic Development

    Identification of Pressures and Impacts Arising Frm Strategic Development

    Report for Scottish Environment Protection Agency/ Neil Deasley Planning and European Affairs Manager Scottish Natural Heritage Scottish Environment Protection Agency Erskine Court The Castle Business Park Identification of Pressures and Impacts Stirling FK9 4TR Arising From Strategic Development Proposed in National Planning Policy Main Contributors and Development Plans Andrew Smith John Pomfret Geoff Bodley Neil Thurston Final Report Anna Cohen Paul Salmon March 2004 Kate Grimsditch Entec UK Limited Issued by ……………………………………………… Andrew Smith Approved by ……………………………………………… John Pomfret Entec UK Limited 6/7 Newton Terrace Glasgow G3 7PJ Scotland Tel: +44 (0) 141 222 1200 Fax: +44 (0) 141 222 1210 Certificate No. FS 13881 Certificate No. EMS 69090 09330 h:\common\environmental current projects\09330 - sepa strategic planning study\c000\final report.doc In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this document is printed on recycled paper produced from 100% post-consumer waste or TCF (totally chlorine free) paper COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Report No: Contractor : Entec UK Ltd BACKGROUND The work was commissioned jointly by SEPA and SNH. The project sought to identify potential pressures and impacts on Scottish Water bodies as a consequence of land use proposals within the current suite of Scottish development Plans and other published strategy documents. The report forms part of the background information being collected by SEPA for the River Basin Characterisation Report in relation to the Water Framework Directive. The project will assist SNH’s environmental audit work by providing an overview of trends in strategic development across Scotland. MAIN FINDINGS Development plans post 1998 were reviewed to ensure up-to-date and relevant information.
  • Tordess Oeeupiedi

    Tordess Oeeupiedi

    THE SCOTTISH CAMPAIGN TO RESIST THE ATOMIC MENACE,2 AINSLIE PLACE,E~INBURGH.031-2?5 7752 ISSN 0140- 7340 No 8 October/November 1978 lOp TORDESS OEEUPIEDI ---protesters rebuild cottage---- On 30th September the date on which the tenant farmers on the Torness site gave up their land to the SSEB, the 15 members of the Torness Alliance moved on. Supported by a group of similar size outwith the site; they immediately began to rebuild the derilict 'Half Moon' cottage, which is seen as a base for the occupation. This m·ove, to non-violent direct action and civil disobedience, was not taken without careful thought and planning.Clearly Mr. Millan, the Secretary of State, has decided to turn a deaf ear to any objections to Torness - whether they come from anyi- nuclear groups or the Labour · controlled Lothian Regional Council~ Thus, in the spirit of the Torness declaration, non-violent direct action is the only option availabl e if the power sta!on is to be stopped. DE COMMISSIONING FRIENDLY THE HIDDEN PROBLEMS Those participating (from all over Britain) British nuclear This statement, however, carefully planned this companies have deliberately flies i n the face of action; and of necessit y played down the difficulties evidence , both from t he trained in non-violent involved in scrapping atomic United States and the A. E.A's techniques. This planning pl ant. own sc-ientists. Their has paid off the l ocal report s claim t hat outworn community has rallied round According to a r.ecent plants are highly radioact ive in support and materials for 'Guardian' repor.t the Atomic and should be l eft for the reconstruction of the Ener gy Authority "is certain 100- 150 years for the cottage have been readily · that i t could demolish a r adi at ion t o " cool down" ma.de available; and the· nuclear react or local police have been comprehensivel y enough to b efoo=~=~]J univer sally friendly.
  • Carbon Trust 2020

    Carbon Trust 2020

    Acknowledgments This summary report has been produced by the Carbon Trust, with specific sections informed by studies delivered by the following external technical contractors: • Turbine requirements and foundation scaling: Ramboll • Heavy lift offshore operations: Seaway 7 • Dynamic export cable development: BPP Cable Solutions • Monitoring and inspection: Oceaneering Study results are based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone who has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of these studies. Special thanks to the following organisations: ABS, AeroDyn, Boskalis, BV, ClassNK, DEIF, DEME Offshore, DNV GL, Glosten, GustoMSC, Ideol, Lloyd's Register, LM Wind Power Blades, MESH Engineering, MHI Vestas, NREL, Principle Power, Royal IHC and Offshore Wind Logistics / Saipem, SBM Offshore, Senvion, Siemens Gamesa, SSB, SwissRe, TheSwitch, Timken, TÜV Nord, Valmont SM Disclaimer The key findings presented in this report represent general results and conclusions that are not specific to individual floating wind concepts. Caution should therefore be taken in generalising findings to specific technologies. It should be noted that information and findings do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting industry partners but are based on independent analysis undertaken by the Carbon Trust and respective external technical contractors. Published: July 2020 The Carbon Trust’s mission is to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. It is a world leading expert on carbon reduction and clean technology. As a not-for-dividend group, it advises governments and leading companies around the world, reinvesting profits into its low carbon mission.
  • Coasts and Seas of the United Kingdom. Region 4 South-East Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth

    Coasts and Seas of the United Kingdom. Region 4 South-East Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth

    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 4 South-east Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1997 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, A.L. Buck, R.M. Sumerling Administration & editorial assistance J. Plaza, P.A. Smith, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice comes from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group N. Hailey English Nature Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prof. S.J. Lockwood Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. Pullen WWF-UK (Worldwide Fund for Nature) Dr P.C.
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks

    A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks

    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
  • The Design Studio Brief in Architecture's

    The Design Studio Brief in Architecture's

    Charrette:essay Tales and tools: the Design Studio Brief in Architecture’s expanded field. Suzanne Ewing. Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of Edinburgh. ABSTRACT This essay argues that the Design Studio Brief establishes tacit disciplinary practices of architecture, as well as more explicit pursuit of topics of formulated relevance or concern. A series of tales of Design Studio Briefs from the fourth year of study at one UK Architecture School are sampled at dates which coincide with significant moments in Scotland’s recent constitutional history: the 1979 devolution Referendum, the 1997/1999 establishment of the Scottish Parliament, and the 2014 Independence Referendum. The tales are followed by a discussion on tools: towards means and practices which might inform the re-tooling of the Design Studio Brief and its ends. KEYWORDS design studio brief, disciplinary practices, architectural education Over the past forty years the field of global Higher Education economy. Allied to Architecture has expanded in scope and in the funding conditions which redefine national and potential of architectural design as subject and transnational educational responsibilities, what practice.1 Focus has shifted from site to field, educational capital is and what it is for, from static object to moving project.2 requires a refreshed ethical position.5 Preoccupations of Design Studios in architectural education have shifted from Euro- Architectural Design Studios are often known centric sites and artefacts deemed worthy
  • FC Draft Habitats Regulations Appraisal

    FC Draft Habitats Regulations Appraisal

    FIFE plan Dra Habitats Regulaons Appraisal : Environmental Report Annex 6 Fife Local Development Plan Proposed Plan October 2014 FC OiUfeN C I L Economy, Planning & Employability Services Glossary Appropriate Assessment - part of the Habitats Regulations Appraisal process, required where the plan is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects Birds Directive - Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 30th November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds. BTO tetrad data - bird counts based on 2km by 2km squares carried out by the British Trust for Ornithology Natura 2000/European sites - The Europe-wide network of Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation, intended to provide protection for birds in accordance with the Birds Directive, and for the species and habitats listed in the Habitats Directive. Special Area of Conservation (SAC) - Area designated in respect of habitats and/or species under Articles 3 – 5 of the EC Habitats Directive. All SACs are European sites and part of the Natura 2000 network. Special Protection Area (SPA) - Area classified in respect of bird species under Article 4 of the Birds Directive. All SPAs are European sites and part of the Natura 2000 network. i Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................
  • Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment Report 2006

    Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment Report 2006

    RRReeepppooorrrttt Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment Report for Fife Council - 2006 A Report Produced for Fife Council AEAT/ENV/R/2237 Issue 2 July 2006 UNRESTRICTED UNRESTRICTED AEAT/ENV/R/2237 Issue 2 Title Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment Report for Fife Council – 2006 Customer Fife Council Customer reference Confidentiality, Unrestricted copyright and reproduction "Copyright AEA Technology plc All rights reserved Enquiries about copyright and reproduction should be addressed to the Commercial Manager, AEA Technology plc" File reference netcen/ED49328002 Reference number AEAT/ENV/R/2237/Issue 2 Address for AEA Technology - netcen Correspondence Glengarnock Technology Centre Caledonian Rd Glengarnock Ayrshire KA14 3DD Telephone 0870 190 6574 Facsimile 0870 190 5151 [email protected] netcen is a operating division of AEA Technology plc netcen is certificated to ISO9001 & ISO 14001 Name Signature Date Author K Stevenson 26/07/2006 Reviewed by J McGinlay 26/07/2006 Approved by K Stevenson 26/07/2006 netcen ii UNRESTRICTED AEAT/ENV/R/2237 Issue 2 Executive Summary This Air Quality Updating and Screening Report has been prepared for Fife Council as part of the Local Air Quality Management (LAQM) system introduced in Part IV of the Environment Act 1995. Published guidance from the Scottish Executive has been closely followed in the preparation of this report. The second round of air quality review and assessments has been completed by Fife Council. The Council are now required to proceed to the third round in which sources of emissions to air are reassessed to identify whether the situation has changed since the second round, and if so, what impact this may have on predicted exceedences of the air quality objectives.
  • Torness Monthly Report June 2014

    Torness Monthly Report June 2014

    Torness monthly report June 2014 Introduction We are keen to hear the views of our local communities. We recognise that good communication is a two way process and we welcome your feedback and comments. Safety • The station had no lost time incidents (LTIs) during the reporting period and has had 1991 LTI free days up to 30 June, that’s more than 5 years. • The station had no emergency services call outs during June • There was one first aid injury at the station in June • The station had no environmental events during June and has gone 1232 days without an environmental event (more than 3 years) Station output Reactor 1 and 2 were operational for the month of June. As previously communicated reactor one was shut down due to an issue with the electrical system within our conventional plant on 1 July. Our engineers are progressing through testing routines and it will be returned to power as soon as testing is satisfactorily completed. Reactor 2 planned maintenance work started on Wednesday, 2 July to repair a turbine governor valve. The valve controls the flow of steam into the turbine and is part of the conventional, non- nuclear, side of the power station. Reactor 2 will be returned to power after this work has been finished. Four flasks containing spent fuel were safely transported to Sellafield for reprocessing during the period. Station news Golden service award for Willie There aren’t many people who can say they’ve been with a company for 50 years, but Willie Clarkson is one of them! When 15 year old Willie started out as an apprentice at Kincardine power station on 6 July 1964, he could never have imagined what the future had in store.
  • Tariff Information Paper

    Tariff Information Paper

    Tariff Information Paper This information paper provides a forecast of Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs from 2017/18 to 2020/21. These tariffs apply to generators and suppliers. Together with the final tariffs for 2016/17 this publication shows how tariffs may evolve over the the next next five years. Forecast tariffs for 2017/18 will be refined throughout the year. 11 February 2016 Version 1.0 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................. 4 2. Tariff Forecast Tables ............................................................................... 5 2.1 Generator Wider Tariffs ....................................................................... 5 2.2 Summary of generator wider tariffs from 2016/17 to 2020/21 ........... 11 2.3 Onshore Local Circuit Tariffs ............................................................. 12 Any Questions? 2.4 Onshore Local Substation Tariffs ...................................................... 14 2.5 Offshore Local Tariffs ........................................................................ 14 Contact: 2.6 Small Generator Discount ................................................................. 15 Mary Owen 2.7 Demand Tariffs.................................................................................. 15 2.8 Summary of Demand Tariffs.............................................................. 16 Stuart Boyle 3. Key Drivers for Tariff Changes............................................................... 17
  • Adopted Fifeplan Final Document Reduced Size.Pdf

    Adopted Fifeplan Final Document Reduced Size.Pdf

    PEOPLE ECONOMY PLACE FIFE plan Fife Local Development Plan Adopted Plan Economy, Planning & September 2017 Employability Services Adopted FIFEplan, July 2017 1 Written Statement FIFEplan PEOPLE ECONOMY PLACE Ordnance Survey Copyright Statement The mapping in this document is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. © crown copyright and database right (2017). All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100023385. 2 Adopted FIFEplan, July 2017 Alternative languages and formats This document is called the Proposed FIFEplan Local Development Plan. It describes where and how the development will take place in the area over the 12 years from 2014-2026 to meet the future environmental, economic, and social needs, and provides an indication of development beyond this period. To request an alternative format or translation of this information please use the telephone numbers below. The information included in this publication can be made available in any language, large print, Braille, audio CD/tape and British Sign Language interpretation on request by calling 03451 55 55 00. Calls cost 3 to 7p per minute from a UK landline, mobile rates may vary. The informaon included in this publicaon can be made available in any language, large print, Braille, audio CD/tape and Brish Sign Language interpretaon on 7 3 03451 55 55 77 request by calling 03451 55 55 00. Calls cost 3 to 7p per minute from a UK landline, mobile rates may vary. Sa to informacje na temat dzialu uslug mieszkaniowych przy wladzach lokalnych Fife. Aby zamowic tlumaczenie tych informacji, prosimy zadzwonic pod numer 03451 55 55 44.
  • Broken Promises and Offshored Jobs

    Broken Promises and Offshored Jobs

    Broken Promises and Offshored Jobs STUC report on employment in the low- carbon and renewable energy economy Broken promises and offshored jobs: an STUC report on employment in the low-carbon and renewable energy economy This report looks at the past promises of employment in the low-carbon and renewable energy (LCRE) economy and how this has not translated into the jobs boom promised. By analysing the current make-up of employment in the low-carbon economy and a number of recent renewables projects, it considers the implications of a failure of industrial policy. In presenting this report, the STUC are not criticising the LCRE economy per se. Indeed the STUC is absolutely committed to building a low- carbon economy and meeting climate change targets. However, we are criticising the failure of industrial policy to ensure that workers, businesses and Government in Scotland benefit from Scotland’s natural resources. Without a domestic industrial base for the LCRE economy, not only will workers in Scotland miss out, but there are serious implications in terms of tax, transparency, economic democracy and meeting climate targets. Job promises Over the past fifteen years, Scottish Government Strategies, from a number of political parties, have promised significant numbers of jobs in renewables. For example Harnessing Scotland’s Marine Energy Potential (2004) - 7,000 direct jobs in the marine industry by 2020.i Renewables Gap Chain Analysis (2004) - 17,000-35,000 jobs by 2020.ii Low Carbon Economic Strategy (2010) – annual growth of 4% a year to 130,000 jobs by 2020 (and 5% of the overall workforce).