DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fish Populations of the Lower Forth Estuary, Including The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Fish Populations of the Lower Forth Estuary, Including The The Fish Populations of the Lower Forth Estuary, including the Environmental Impact of Cooling Water Extraction. M.F.D. Greenwood Department of Biological Sciences University of Stirling A thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2001 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk THESIS CONTAINS VIDEO CD DVD TAPE CASSETTE Declaration The work presented in this thesis is the result of my own investigations. It has not been nor will be submitted in candidature for any degree, in this or any other university. M.F.D. Greenwood 2 Abstract The present study investigated the fish populations of the lower Forth Estuary, east Scotland. Cooling water extraction by the 2400 MW Longannet Power Station (LPS) inevitably removes a certain quantity of fish from the estuary, all of which experience mortality. The present study employed a sampling regime of greater intensity than previous studies to investigate the extent of mortalities from January 1999 - December 2000. Collections of fish impinged on intake screens were made eight times monthly, at L W or HW of spring or neap tides during the day or by night. Marine species dominated the assemblage of fish collected, with sprat, herring, and whiting contributing> 80% of total abundance. Sprat was twice as abundant as herring in 1999, while the proportions were very similar in 2000. Total abundance of all species 7 7 collected in 1999 was estimated at 1. 09 x 10 , while the value of 3.29 x 10 in 2000 was three times larger. These figures were the largest recorded among British estuarine and marine power stations, but were precisely the correct order based on an exponential relationship between total impingement and water abstraction rate established from data from other locations. Validation of the estimated total biomass of fish removed was given by comparison with the known total mass of all materials disposed to landfill. Statistical analysis of impingement data showed that tidal range and season were the most important environmental variables influencing the rate of removal of fish from the estuary. That light was not significant for most species is attributed to high levels of turbidity and the resulting low visibility by day and night. Demersal and benthic fish abundances collected from 1982 - 2000 in 30 annual trawls at three sites in the mid-lower Forth Estuary were analysed. Species tended to be present in greatest abundance at the most seaward of the sites. Patterns of seasonal abundance reflected those observed in the impingement study at LPS, and catches tended to be greatest at L W. Total species richness showed no significant trend over time, whilst total annual abundance of fish captured in trawls showed a significant negative trend. This was largely due to significant declines in the two most abundant species, namely whiting and eel pout, attributable in the latter case to increasing temperatures. Changes in the ichthyofaunal composition were largely driven by whiting, eel pout, cod and plaice. Eight of ten common species showed no significant trend in abundance over the length of the time series, suggesting them to perhaps be at equilibrium densities. Quantities of commercially fished species above minimum landing size limits that were removed by LPS were very low, and restricted to herring and occasional whiting. The quantity of juveniles that could have recruited into the fished populations was expressed as equivalent adults. The values were larger than any previously reported in the UK, primarily due to the quantities of juvenile fish impinged being greater than at any other British power station, and the importance of the Forth as a nursery area for marine species. It was concluded that LPS is the dominant UK power station in terms of magnitude of impingement losses. It may be prudent to consider a precautionary approach to mitigate losses, and to this end options for reduction of the magnitude of impingement are discussed. 3 Contents Declaration .................................................................. " ..................................... " ......... 2 Abstract. ........................................................................................................................ 3 Contents ........................................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... l 0 Dedication ............. '" ........... " ................................................... '" ................................ 12 Glossary of Abbreviations ........................................................................................... 13 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................ 15 1.1. Overview ......................................................................................................... 15 1.2. The study area: the Forth Estuary ..................................................................... 17 1.3. The ichthyofauna of estuaries ........................................................................... 22 1.3.1. Categories of estuarine fish ....................................................................... 22 1.3.2. Characteristics of estuarine fish ................................................................. 23 1.4. Thermal power generation and the aquatic environment.. ................................. 27 1.5. Aims of the present study ................................................................................. 31 Chapter 2. Fish extraction by Longannet Power Station, 1999 & 2000: extent of impingement and influences on impingement rate ....................................................... 33 2.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 3 4 2.2. Materials and methods ................................................................................. 37 2.2.1. Study site ............................................................................................. 37 2.2.2. Sampling protocol ................................................................................ 38 2.2.3. Potential errors associated with the sampling method ........................... 39 2.2.3.1. Number of samples taken during each sampling session ............... 39 2.2.3.2. Sampling duration ........................................................................ 40 2.2.3.3. Residence time within system and sampling efficiency ................. 42 2.2.4. Calculation of total annual impinged fish abundance and biomass ........ 44 2.2.5. Examination of potential predictors of impingement rate ...................... 45 2.3. Results ......................................................................................................... 48 2.3.1 Water quality parameters near the LPS water intake ............................. 48 2.3.2 Composition ofLPS impingement samples, 1999 - 2000 ..................... 51 2.3.3 Abundance and mass estimates of fish impingement at LPS, 1999 - 2000 ............................................................................................................. 54 2.3.4 Predictors offish impingement rate at LPS ........................................... 62 2.4 Discussion ................................................................................................... 70 2.4.1. Species composition of impinged LPS ichthyofauna ................................. 70 2.4.2. Extent ofLPS impingement ...................................................................... 73 2.4.2.1. Abundance and biomass estimates ofLPS impingement, 1999 - 200073 2.4.2.2. Comparison of estimated LPS impingement with predictions based on water extraction rate ......................................................................................... 75 2.4.2.3. Comparision of estimated fish biomass impinged with known values of all materials disposed to landfill ....................................................................... 78 2.4.3. Assessment of significant predictors of impingement rate at LPS .............. 80 2.4.3.1. Water quality parameters as predictors ofLPS impingement .............. 80 5 2.4.3.2. Environmental and operational predictors ofLPS impingement .... 87 2.5. Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 96 Chapter 3. Fish populations in the mid- and lower Forth Estuary: temporal, tidal and spatial variations in fish abundance as assessed by demersal and pelagic trawling ....... 97 3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 97 3.2. Materials and methods ............................................................................... 101 3.2.1. Agassiz trawl study ................................................................................. 101 3.2.1.1. Field study .................................................................................. 101 3.2.1.2. Generalised Linear Modelling of Agassiz data ............................ 101 3.2.1.3. Non-parametric exploratory analysis of Agassiz trawl data ......... 102 3.2.1.3. Investigation of population size variability in relation to species latitudinal range ............................................................................................. 103 3.2.1.4. Preliminary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Pressures and Impacts Arising Frm Strategic Development
    Report for Scottish Environment Protection Agency/ Neil Deasley Planning and European Affairs Manager Scottish Natural Heritage Scottish Environment Protection Agency Erskine Court The Castle Business Park Identification of Pressures and Impacts Stirling FK9 4TR Arising From Strategic Development Proposed in National Planning Policy Main Contributors and Development Plans Andrew Smith John Pomfret Geoff Bodley Neil Thurston Final Report Anna Cohen Paul Salmon March 2004 Kate Grimsditch Entec UK Limited Issued by ……………………………………………… Andrew Smith Approved by ……………………………………………… John Pomfret Entec UK Limited 6/7 Newton Terrace Glasgow G3 7PJ Scotland Tel: +44 (0) 141 222 1200 Fax: +44 (0) 141 222 1210 Certificate No. FS 13881 Certificate No. EMS 69090 09330 h:\common\environmental current projects\09330 - sepa strategic planning study\c000\final report.doc In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this document is printed on recycled paper produced from 100% post-consumer waste or TCF (totally chlorine free) paper COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Report No: Contractor : Entec UK Ltd BACKGROUND The work was commissioned jointly by SEPA and SNH. The project sought to identify potential pressures and impacts on Scottish Water bodies as a consequence of land use proposals within the current suite of Scottish development Plans and other published strategy documents. The report forms part of the background information being collected by SEPA for the River Basin Characterisation Report in relation to the Water Framework Directive. The project will assist SNH’s environmental audit work by providing an overview of trends in strategic development across Scotland. MAIN FINDINGS Development plans post 1998 were reviewed to ensure up-to-date and relevant information.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish) of the Helford Estuary
    HELFORD RIVER SURVEY A survey of the Pisces (Fish) of the Helford Estuary A Report to the Helford Voluntary Marine Conservation Area Group funded by the World Wide Fund for Nature U.K. and English Nature P A Gainey 1999 1 Summary The Helford Voluntary Marine Conservation Area (hereafter HVMCA) was designated in 1987 and since that time a series of surveys have been carried out to examine the flora and fauna present. In this study no less that eighty species of fish have been identified within the confines of the HVMCA. Many of the more common fish were found to be present in large numbers. Several species have been designated as nationally scarce whilst others are nationally rare and receive protection at varying levels. The estuary is obviously an important nursery for several species which are of economic importance. A full list of the fish species present and the protection some of them receive is given in the Appendices Nine species of fish have been recorded as new to the HVMCA. ISBN 1 901894 30 4 HVMCA Group Office Awelon, Colborne Avenue Illogan, Redruth Cornwall TR16 4EB 2 CONTENTS Summary Location Map - Fig. 1.......................................................................................................... 1 Intertidal sites - Fig. 2 ......................................................................................................... 2 Sublittoral sites - Fig. 3 ...................................................................................................... 3 Bathymetric chart - Fig. 4 .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tordess Oeeupiedi
    THE SCOTTISH CAMPAIGN TO RESIST THE ATOMIC MENACE,2 AINSLIE PLACE,E~INBURGH.031-2?5 7752 ISSN 0140- 7340 No 8 October/November 1978 lOp TORDESS OEEUPIEDI ---protesters rebuild cottage---- On 30th September the date on which the tenant farmers on the Torness site gave up their land to the SSEB, the 15 members of the Torness Alliance moved on. Supported by a group of similar size outwith the site; they immediately began to rebuild the derilict 'Half Moon' cottage, which is seen as a base for the occupation. This m·ove, to non-violent direct action and civil disobedience, was not taken without careful thought and planning.Clearly Mr. Millan, the Secretary of State, has decided to turn a deaf ear to any objections to Torness - whether they come from anyi- nuclear groups or the Labour · controlled Lothian Regional Council~ Thus, in the spirit of the Torness declaration, non-violent direct action is the only option availabl e if the power sta!on is to be stopped. DE COMMISSIONING FRIENDLY THE HIDDEN PROBLEMS Those participating (from all over Britain) British nuclear This statement, however, carefully planned this companies have deliberately flies i n the face of action; and of necessit y played down the difficulties evidence , both from t he trained in non-violent involved in scrapping atomic United States and the A. E.A's techniques. This planning pl ant. own sc-ientists. Their has paid off the l ocal report s claim t hat outworn community has rallied round According to a r.ecent plants are highly radioact ive in support and materials for 'Guardian' repor.t the Atomic and should be l eft for the reconstruction of the Ener gy Authority "is certain 100- 150 years for the cottage have been readily · that i t could demolish a r adi at ion t o " cool down" ma.de available; and the· nuclear react or local police have been comprehensivel y enough to b efoo=~=~]J univer sally friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence Raphael J. Heffron
    Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence EPRG Working Paper 1407 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1457 Raphael J. Heffron and William J. Nuttall Abstract This paper examines the role of nuclear energy in Scotland, and the concerns for Scotland as it votes for independence. The aim is to focus directly on current Scottish energy policy and its relationship to nuclear energy. The paper does not purport to advise on a vote for or against Scottish independence but aims to further the debate in an underexplored area of energy policy that will be of value whether Scotland secures independence or further devolution. There are four central parts to this paper: (1) consideration of the Scottish electricity mix; (2) an analysis of a statement about nuclear energy made by the Scottish energy minister; (3) examination of nuclear energy issues as presented in the Scottish Independence White Paper; and (4) the issue of nuclear waste is assessed. A recurrent theme in the analysis is that whether one is for, against, or indifferent to new nuclear energy development, it highlights a major gap in Scotland’s energy and environmental policy goals. Too often, the energy policy debate from the Scottish Government perspective has been reduced to a low-carbon energy development debate between nuclear energy and renewable energy. There is little reflection on how to reduce Scottish dependency on fossil fuels. For Scotland to aspire to being a low-carbon economy, to decarbonising its electricity market, and to being a leader within the climate change community, it needs to tackle the issue of how to stop the continuation of burning fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Salcombe Bioblitz 2015 Final Report.Pdf
    FINAL REPORT 1 | P a g e Salcombe Bioblitz 2015 – Final Report Salcombe Bioblitz 2015 This year’s Bioblitz was held in North Sands, Salcombe (Figure 1). Surveying took place from 11am on Sunday the 27th September until 2pm on Monday the 28th September 2015. Over the course of the 24+ hours of the event, 11 timetabled, public-participation activities took place, including scientific surveys and guided walks. More than 250 people attended, including 75 local school children, and over 150 volunteer experts and enthusiasts, families and members of the public. A total of 1109 species were recorded. Introduction A Bioblitz is a multidisciplinary survey of biodiversity in a set place at a set time. The main aim of the event is to make a snapshot of species present in an area and ultimately, to raise public awareness of biodiversity, science and conservation. The event was the seventh marine/coastal Bioblitz to be organised by the Marine Biological Association (MBA). This year the MBA led in partnership with South Devon Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Ambios Ltd, with both organisations contributing vital funding and support for the project overall. Ambios Ltd were able to provide support via the LEMUR+ wildlife.technology.skills project and the Heritage Lottery Fund. Support also came via donations from multiple organisations. Xamax Clothing Ltd provided the iconic event t-shirts free of cost; Salcombe Harbour Hotel and Spa and Monty Hall’s Great Escapes donated gifts for use as competition prizes; The Winking Prawn Café and Higher Rew Caravan and Camping Park offered discounts to Bioblitz staff and volunteers for the duration of the event; Morrisons Kingsbridge donated a voucher that was put towards catering; Budget Car Hire provided use of a van to transport equipment to and from the event free of cost; and donations were received from kind individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Trust 2020
    Acknowledgments This summary report has been produced by the Carbon Trust, with specific sections informed by studies delivered by the following external technical contractors: • Turbine requirements and foundation scaling: Ramboll • Heavy lift offshore operations: Seaway 7 • Dynamic export cable development: BPP Cable Solutions • Monitoring and inspection: Oceaneering Study results are based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone who has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of these studies. Special thanks to the following organisations: ABS, AeroDyn, Boskalis, BV, ClassNK, DEIF, DEME Offshore, DNV GL, Glosten, GustoMSC, Ideol, Lloyd's Register, LM Wind Power Blades, MESH Engineering, MHI Vestas, NREL, Principle Power, Royal IHC and Offshore Wind Logistics / Saipem, SBM Offshore, Senvion, Siemens Gamesa, SSB, SwissRe, TheSwitch, Timken, TÜV Nord, Valmont SM Disclaimer The key findings presented in this report represent general results and conclusions that are not specific to individual floating wind concepts. Caution should therefore be taken in generalising findings to specific technologies. It should be noted that information and findings do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting industry partners but are based on independent analysis undertaken by the Carbon Trust and respective external technical contractors. Published: July 2020 The Carbon Trust’s mission is to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. It is a world leading expert on carbon reduction and clean technology. As a not-for-dividend group, it advises governments and leading companies around the world, reinvesting profits into its low carbon mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Fintastic Sharks and Rays Lesson and Activity Packet
    Florida's Fintastic Sharks and Rays An at-home lesson for grades 3-5 Produced by: This educational workbook was produced through the support of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. 1 What are sharks and rays? Believe it or not, they’re a type of fish! When you think “fish,” you probably picture a trout or tuna, but fishes come in all shapes and sizes. All fishes share the following key characteristics that classify them into this group: Fishes have the simplest of vertebrate hearts with only two chambers- one atrium and one ventricle. The spine in a fish runs down the middle of its back just like ours, making fish vertebrates. All fishes have skeletons, but not all fish skeletons are made out of bones. Some fishes have skeletons made out of cartilage, just like your nose and ears. Fishes are cold-blooded. Cold-blooded animals use their environment to warm up or cool down. Fins help fish swim. Fins come in pairs, like pectoral and pelvic fins or are singular, like caudal or anal fins. Later in this packet, we will look at the different types of fins that fishes have and some of the unique ways they are used. 2 Placoid Ctenoid Ganoid Cycloid Hard protective scales cover the skin of many fish species. Scales can act as “fingerprints” to help identify some fish species. There are several different scale types found in bony fishes, including cycloid (round), ganoid (rectangular or diamond), and ctenoid (scalloped). Cartilaginous fishes have dermal denticles (Placoid) that resemble tiny teeth on their skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Coasts and Seas of the United Kingdom. Region 4 South-East Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 4 South-east Scotland: Montrose to Eyemouth edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1997 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, A.L. Buck, R.M. Sumerling Administration & editorial assistance J. Plaza, P.A. Smith, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice comes from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group N. Hailey English Nature Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prof. S.J. Lockwood Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. Pullen WWF-UK (Worldwide Fund for Nature) Dr P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Birkett, Derek G
    SUBMISSION FROM DEREK G BIRKETT Security of Scotland’s Energy Supply Personal Introduction The author has had a lifetime of working experience in the electricity supply industry, retiring at the millenium after twenty years as a grid control engineer under both state and privatised operation. Previous experience on shift were on coal and hydro plant for a decade, with the CEGB and NofSHEB. A further decade was spent on project installation and commissioning at five power station locations across the UK of which two were coal and three nuclear including Dounreay PFR. The latter experience gave chartered status on a basis of an engineering degree from Leeds University. Upon retirement, commitment was given as a technical witness for two public inquiries opposing wind farm applications as well as being an independent witness at the strategic session of the Beauly/Denny public inquiry. In 2010 a book was published entitled ‘When will the Lights go out?’ leading to public presentations, three of which were held in London. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/917/0088330.pdf (page 72) Basic Principles As a commodity electricity cannot be stored to any degree and must therefore be produced on demand. As an essential service to modern society its provision is highly dependent upon a narrow field of specialised technical expertise. The unified GB Grid is a dynamic entity, inherently unstable. Transmission interconnection of various supply sources provide security and enable significant capital and operational savings. However bulk transmission of power brings power losses, mitigated by siting generation in proximity to consumer demand. Maintaining system balance on a continual basis is critical for system security, not just with active power but also reactive power that enables voltage (pressure) levels to be maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Time and Tide Bell Community Interest Company The
    To bid, visit #200Fish www.bit.ly/200FishAuction Art inspired by each species of fish found in the North Sea : mail - il,com Auction The At the exhibition and by e and exhibition At the biffvernon@gma Lincolnshire Time and Tide Bell Community Interest Company Bidding is open now by e-mail and at the gallery during the exhibition’s opening hours. Bidding ends 6 pm Monday 3rd September 2018 The #200Fish Auction Thanks to the many artists who have so generously donated their works to the Lincolnshire Time and Tide Bell Community Interest Company to raise funds for our future art and environmental projects, we are selling some of the artworks in the #200Fish exhibition by auction. Here’s how it works. Take a look through this catalogue and if you would like to buy a piece send us an email giving the Fish Number and how much you are willing to pay. Or if you visit the North Sea Observatory during the exhibition, 23rd August to 3rd September, you can hand in your bid on paper. Along with your bid amount, please include your e-mail address and postal address. After the auction closes, at 6pm Monday 3rd September 2018, the person who has bid the highest price wins and we’ll send you an e-mail. Sold works can be collected from the gallery on Tuesday the 4th or from my house in North Somercotes any time later. We can post them to you but will charge whatever it costs us. Bear in mind that the images displayed here are a bit rubbish, just low resolution versions of snapshots as often as not taken on a camera phone rather than in a professional art photo studio.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report 2010
    Fife Council – Scotland July 2010 2010 Air Quality Progress Report for Fife Council In fulfilment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management July 2010 Progress Report i July 2010 Fife Council – Scotland Title 2010 Air Quality Progress Report for Fife Council Customer Fife Council Customer reference AEAT/ENV/FIFEPRG2010 Confidentiality, copyright This report is the Copyright of AEA Technology plc and has been prepared by AEA and reproduction Technology plc under contract to Fife Council. The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of AEA Technology plc. AEA Technology plc accepts no liability whatsoever to any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed therein. File reference AEAT/ENV/R/2977 Reference number ED56066 AEA Glengarnock Technology Centre Caledonian Road Glengarnock Ayrshire KA14 3DD T: 0870 190 5301 F: 0870 190 5151 AEA is a business name of AEA Technology plc AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Author Name David Monaghan Approved by Name Scott Hamilton Signature Date 23.07.2010 ii Progress Report Fife Council – Scotland July 2010 Local Authority Douglas Mayne Officer Department Environmental Strategy Team Address Fife Council Environmental Services Kingdom House Kingdom Avenue Glenrothes Fife KY7 5LY Telephone 08451 555555. Ext. 493619 e-mail [email protected] Report Reference AEAT/ENV/R/2977 number Date 23/07/10 Progress Report iii July 2010 Fife Council – Scotland Executive Summary This Air Quality Progress Report has been prepared for Fife Council as part of the Local Air Quality Management (LAQM) system introduced in Part IV of the Environment Act 1995.
    [Show full text]