DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 TABLE of CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 TABLE of CONTENTS Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Welcome 5. Sense of About this Report Our Year in Summary – Highlights of 2009 Belonging & Trust Performance Highlights Our People About Us Our Communities Our Strategy Key Statistic 2. Corporate Ethics & 6. Safety & Reliability Responsibility Governance & Management Occupational Health Governance Health and Safety Standards How We Manage CSR Accidents & Injuries Stakeholder Engagement Safety Programmes Benchmarking and Recognition Plant Reliability & Energy Security Energy Security 3. Economic Results Key Financial Results 2009 Investment and Pricing Customer Bills 7. Customer Focus Customer Profile Ofgem Energy Supply Probe Pricing and Product Innovation 4. Respect for the Sales and Marketing Customer Information Environment Customer Service Environmental Policy Help for Vulnerable Customers Climate Change Acidification & Air Quality Resource Use and Waste Water 8. Assurance & Biodiversity Environmental Management Information Sites and Infrastructure Welcome A Message From Ann Loughrey, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility Welcome to our Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009. The year was a challenging one as the UK suffered the effects of the economic recession – but despite this, we made huge progress in a number of areas. One of the most exciting developments was our progress towards making Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) a realistic option in the fight against global climate change. This technology could have the potential to capture around 90% of the CO2 produced from burning coal to produce electricity and transport it by pipeline for long-term geological storage under the North Sea. During the year Longannet Power Station became the first major power station in the UK to capture CO2 from its flue gases, signalling a major step forward in this clean coal technology. Working closely with Norwegian CO2 removal specialists Aker Clean Carbon, by November 2009 we announced a major breakthrough in reducing the amount of energy required in the carbon capture process, which in turn will reduce the cost. We have ambitions to make Longannet Power Station a global centre of excellence for Carbon Capture and Storage and aim to develop a commercial scale demonstration plant by 2014. With several coal power stations the size of Longannet – over 2,000 MW – opening in other parts of the world every week – the results of this work could have a massive impact globally, removing billions of tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere each year and creating engineering jobs in the UK. Global climate change and making the transition to a low carbon economy, while maintaining energy prices at affordable levels for customers continues to be the most significant CSR issue for ScottishPower and our stakeholders. Our response to this challenge is covered in detail in the Respect for the Environment section of this Review, along with information on other areas of stakeholder concern such as air quality, major projects, biodiversity and resource use. We are also continuing to invest hundreds of millions of pounds in upgrading our energy networks to support renewable energy developments and improve the security of customers’ supplies. Delivering this level of investment in the current economic climate and to a very demanding timescale is a key challenge for us – but one that we are determined to meet. Welcome and Introduction 1 Water is an environmental issue that has grown in significance during the past year, following the introduction of the Water Framework Directive and the drafting of River Basin Management Plans. We continue to have extensive dialogue with stakeholder groups at our Galloway Hydro-electric scheme and have introduced a new section on water in the environmental section of our Review. Energy prices and fuel poverty continued to be the most significant customer issues. During the year we continued to work with Energy Action Scotland, National Energy Action and the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group to help address the issue of affordable warmth. We spent over £79 million under mandatory government programmes to improve the energy efficiency of customers’ homes, helping many low-income families to reduce their energy consumption in the long term, and channelled a further £7 million into social tariffs to help those customers most in need. During the year we also targeted a further £5 million at projects to help people suffering from fuel poverty through our charity, the ScottishPower Energy People Trust and other community partnerships. To help all customers get the best value energy deals, we reduced prices in March 2009 and launched several new products, including discounted, fixed and capped price deals, as well as a new internet- based Pay As You Go service. Safety continues to be a key priority across our business. During 2009 there were no fatalities amongst our employees or contractors and we reduced the number of Lost Time Accidents across our businesses from 29 to 12. Process and asset safety are areas in which ScottishPower is investing time, effort and money, to ensure that our management systems are in line with best practice. We also invested around £3.5 million in our local communities, supporting projects that enhance education and employability, public safety, the environment, arts and culture, as well as many hundreds of charities that are close to the hearts of the people who live in the areas where we operate. We remain committed to doing business responsibly. In this CSR Annual Review and on our CSR TV station you will find details of some of the great initiatives our businesses have been involved in during 2009. I hope you find it interesting. As always, we would welcome your feedback on this year’s Review. Ann Loughrey ScottishPower’s Head of Corporate Social Responsibility Welcome and Introduction 2 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 About this Report Our CSR Annual Review outlines our approach and reports on our performance against key environmental, social and economic indicators from January to December 2009, unless otherwise stated. We report on CSR annually – our last report was published in July 2009. The report covers the activities of Scottish Power Limited (ScottishPower) in the UK, but excludes ScottishPower Renewables and other IBERDROLA Group acitivties in the UK. This year, for the first time, we have aligned our reporting to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI3) framework in line with the IBERDROLA Group. We have continued to report on issues not covered by the GRI framework where our stakeholders have indicated that this is important to them. We have sought to provide a comprehensive, accurate and transparent account of our approach to key issues, our performance over the period and to present this information within the context of current legislative, regulatory and market influences. Where we have not reported against a GRI indicator, this is generally explained within the appropriate section of the Review – for example, the use of child or forced labour is prohibited by EU law. We have presented the information under our six key values: Our Six Key Values • Corporate Ethics & Responsibility • Sense of Belonging & Trust • Economic Results • Safety & Reliability • Respect for the Environment • Customer Focus Materiality We continue to report on the issues that our stakeholders consider to be the most important. These were defined originally in 2004 through stakeholder workshops and in-depth interviews that identified ScottishPower’s 12 most significant impact areas: Our 12 Significant Impact Areas • Provision of Energy • Wastes & Resource Use • Climate Change & Emissions to Air • Sites, Siting and Infrastructure • Health and Safety • Customers With Special Circumstances • Customer Experience • Communities • Employment Experience • Economic • Biodiversity • Procurement Welcome and Introduction 3 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 Feedback from these groups is channelled through our CSR Steering Committee to ensure that we continue to focus our CSR activities and reporting on the issues that are most significant to stakeholders and ultimately to the success of our business. These impact areas have been retained under our current report structure, with some changes in focus to reflect evolving stakeholder priorities. Wherever possible, we have compiled data to provide a like for like comparison on previous year’s reports. We continue to engage with stakeholder groups, through formal feedback sessions at corporate level, through our Environmental Forum of external experts and with various groups including government, regulators, NGOs, consumer groups, employees and community representatives at both corporate and operational levels n ScottishPower’s Head Office at Atlantic Quay, Glasgowº “Feedback is channelled through our Steering Committee to ensure we continue to focus our CSR activities and reporting on the the most significant issues to stakeholders and ultimately to the success of our business.’ Welcome and Introduction 4 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 Our Year in Summary – Highlights of 2009 January “In May, ScottishPower • We signed a three-year, £40m coal deal with ATH Resources for the supply of 800,000 announced the launch tonnes of Scottish coal, strengthening our of its Carbon Capture support for the local economy. trials at Longannet • We launched an education project with Power
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Pressures and Impacts Arising Frm Strategic Development
    Report for Scottish Environment Protection Agency/ Neil Deasley Planning and European Affairs Manager Scottish Natural Heritage Scottish Environment Protection Agency Erskine Court The Castle Business Park Identification of Pressures and Impacts Stirling FK9 4TR Arising From Strategic Development Proposed in National Planning Policy Main Contributors and Development Plans Andrew Smith John Pomfret Geoff Bodley Neil Thurston Final Report Anna Cohen Paul Salmon March 2004 Kate Grimsditch Entec UK Limited Issued by ……………………………………………… Andrew Smith Approved by ……………………………………………… John Pomfret Entec UK Limited 6/7 Newton Terrace Glasgow G3 7PJ Scotland Tel: +44 (0) 141 222 1200 Fax: +44 (0) 141 222 1210 Certificate No. FS 13881 Certificate No. EMS 69090 09330 h:\common\environmental current projects\09330 - sepa strategic planning study\c000\final report.doc In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this document is printed on recycled paper produced from 100% post-consumer waste or TCF (totally chlorine free) paper COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Report No: Contractor : Entec UK Ltd BACKGROUND The work was commissioned jointly by SEPA and SNH. The project sought to identify potential pressures and impacts on Scottish Water bodies as a consequence of land use proposals within the current suite of Scottish development Plans and other published strategy documents. The report forms part of the background information being collected by SEPA for the River Basin Characterisation Report in relation to the Water Framework Directive. The project will assist SNH’s environmental audit work by providing an overview of trends in strategic development across Scotland. MAIN FINDINGS Development plans post 1998 were reviewed to ensure up-to-date and relevant information.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Document Pack
    Public Document Pack Argyll and Bute Council Comhairle Earra Ghaidheal agus Bhoid Customer Services Executive Director: Douglas Hendry Kilmory, Lochgilphead, PA31 8RT Tel: 01546 602127 Fax: 01546 604435 DX 599700 LOCHGILPHEAD e.mail –[email protected] 20 June 2012 NOTICE OF MEETING A meeting of the PLANNING, PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND LICENSING COMMITTEE will be held in the COUNCIL CHAMBER, KILMORY, LOCHGILPHEAD on WEDNESDAY, 27 JUNE 2012 at 10:00 AM , or at the conclusion of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee at 9.30 am, whichever is the later, which you are requested to attend. Douglas Hendry Executive Director - Customer Services BUSINESS 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST (IF ANY) 3. MINUTES Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee 30 May 2012 (Pages 1 - 16) 4. PRIVATE HIRE LICENSING - LIST OF APPROVED VEHICLES Report by Head of Governance and Law (to follow) 5. DUNLOSSIT ESTATE: ERECTION OF DWELLINGHOUSE AND DETACHED GARAGE: LAND TO SOUTH WEST OF LAGGAN BRIDGE, ISLE OF ISLAY (REF: 10/01931/PP) Report by Head of Planning and Regulatory Services (Pages 17 - 44) 6. MR AND MRS S BATE: SITE FOR THE ERECTION OF CROFT HOUSE: LAND EAST OF ACHARA, OBAN (REF: 11/02115/PPP) Report by Head of Planning and Regulatory Services (Pages 45 - 64) 7. MRS AILSA MORGAN: ERECTION OF 5KW WIND TURBINE (15 METRES TO HUB HEIGHT): LAND NORTH EAST TO TORRBREAC, DERVAIG, ISLE OF MULL (REF: 11/02492/PP) Report by Head of Planning and Regulatory Services (Pages 65 - 80) 8. A'CHRUACH WIND FARM LIMITED: WINDFARM COMPRISING 21 TURBINES (126.5 METRES HIGH TO BLADE TIP), ERECTION OF 2 METEOROLOGICAL MET MASTS, SUB STATION, CONTROL BUILDING, CONSTRUCTION COMPOUNDS, ACCESS WORKS AND ANCILLARY DEVELOPMENT (AMENDED PROPOSAL): LAND AT A'CHRUACH, KILMELFORD FOREST, WEST OF MINARD (REF: 11/02520/PP) Report by Head of Planning and Regulatory Services (Pages 81 - 114) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Tordess Oeeupiedi
    THE SCOTTISH CAMPAIGN TO RESIST THE ATOMIC MENACE,2 AINSLIE PLACE,E~INBURGH.031-2?5 7752 ISSN 0140- 7340 No 8 October/November 1978 lOp TORDESS OEEUPIEDI ---protesters rebuild cottage---- On 30th September the date on which the tenant farmers on the Torness site gave up their land to the SSEB, the 15 members of the Torness Alliance moved on. Supported by a group of similar size outwith the site; they immediately began to rebuild the derilict 'Half Moon' cottage, which is seen as a base for the occupation. This m·ove, to non-violent direct action and civil disobedience, was not taken without careful thought and planning.Clearly Mr. Millan, the Secretary of State, has decided to turn a deaf ear to any objections to Torness - whether they come from anyi- nuclear groups or the Labour · controlled Lothian Regional Council~ Thus, in the spirit of the Torness declaration, non-violent direct action is the only option availabl e if the power sta!on is to be stopped. DE COMMISSIONING FRIENDLY THE HIDDEN PROBLEMS Those participating (from all over Britain) British nuclear This statement, however, carefully planned this companies have deliberately flies i n the face of action; and of necessit y played down the difficulties evidence , both from t he trained in non-violent involved in scrapping atomic United States and the A. E.A's techniques. This planning pl ant. own sc-ientists. Their has paid off the l ocal report s claim t hat outworn community has rallied round According to a r.ecent plants are highly radioact ive in support and materials for 'Guardian' repor.t the Atomic and should be l eft for the reconstruction of the Ener gy Authority "is certain 100- 150 years for the cottage have been readily · that i t could demolish a r adi at ion t o " cool down" ma.de available; and the· nuclear react or local police have been comprehensivel y enough to b efoo=~=~]J univer sally friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence Raphael J. Heffron
    Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence EPRG Working Paper 1407 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1457 Raphael J. Heffron and William J. Nuttall Abstract This paper examines the role of nuclear energy in Scotland, and the concerns for Scotland as it votes for independence. The aim is to focus directly on current Scottish energy policy and its relationship to nuclear energy. The paper does not purport to advise on a vote for or against Scottish independence but aims to further the debate in an underexplored area of energy policy that will be of value whether Scotland secures independence or further devolution. There are four central parts to this paper: (1) consideration of the Scottish electricity mix; (2) an analysis of a statement about nuclear energy made by the Scottish energy minister; (3) examination of nuclear energy issues as presented in the Scottish Independence White Paper; and (4) the issue of nuclear waste is assessed. A recurrent theme in the analysis is that whether one is for, against, or indifferent to new nuclear energy development, it highlights a major gap in Scotland’s energy and environmental policy goals. Too often, the energy policy debate from the Scottish Government perspective has been reduced to a low-carbon energy development debate between nuclear energy and renewable energy. There is little reflection on how to reduce Scottish dependency on fossil fuels. For Scotland to aspire to being a low-carbon economy, to decarbonising its electricity market, and to being a leader within the climate change community, it needs to tackle the issue of how to stop the continuation of burning fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • A Railway to Regenerate Levenmouth
    A railway to regenerate Levenmouth This booklet shows the benefits of reinstating the mothballed Levenmouth railway and how this would transform the A project that ticks local community. all the boxes Scottish National Transport Policy LMRC High Level Promote economic growth √ Objectives Promote social inclusion √ Protect environment and improve health √ Improve safety of journeys √ Improve integration √ Key Strategic Improved journey times and connections √ Outcomes Reduced emissions √ Improved quality, accessibility and affordability √ CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Executive Summary 1 1.2 The Vision 2 1.3 The Proposal 3 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 The mothballed Leven line 4 2.2 Population 6 2.3 Previous studies 8 2.4 Potential rail freight 10 2.5 Support for Levenmouth rail link 11 3. BENEFITS 3.1 Personal stories 12 3.2 What makes a good rail reopening project? 14 3.3 Delivering Scottish Government policy 15 3.4 Freight 16 3.5 Land Value Capture 17 3.6 Tourism 18 3.7 Wider economic and regional benefits 20 3.8 The business case - Benefit to Cost ratio 21 4. RE-INSTATING THE RAILWAY 4.1 Construction costs - Comparing Levenmouth with Borders 22 4.2 Timetable issues 24 4.3 Other project issues 25 5. MOVING FORWARD 5.1 Conclusions 26 5.2 The final report? 26 6. LEVENMOUTH RAIL CAMPAIGN 6.1 About our campaign 27 6.2 Our Charter 28 6.3 More information 29 - 1 - 1. Introduction 1.1 Executive Summary This booklet has been produced by the Levenmouth Rail Campaign (LMRC) with the support of a group of railway professionals who wish to lend their expertise to the campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Trust 2020
    Acknowledgments This summary report has been produced by the Carbon Trust, with specific sections informed by studies delivered by the following external technical contractors: • Turbine requirements and foundation scaling: Ramboll • Heavy lift offshore operations: Seaway 7 • Dynamic export cable development: BPP Cable Solutions • Monitoring and inspection: Oceaneering Study results are based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone who has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of these studies. Special thanks to the following organisations: ABS, AeroDyn, Boskalis, BV, ClassNK, DEIF, DEME Offshore, DNV GL, Glosten, GustoMSC, Ideol, Lloyd's Register, LM Wind Power Blades, MESH Engineering, MHI Vestas, NREL, Principle Power, Royal IHC and Offshore Wind Logistics / Saipem, SBM Offshore, Senvion, Siemens Gamesa, SSB, SwissRe, TheSwitch, Timken, TÜV Nord, Valmont SM Disclaimer The key findings presented in this report represent general results and conclusions that are not specific to individual floating wind concepts. Caution should therefore be taken in generalising findings to specific technologies. It should be noted that information and findings do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting industry partners but are based on independent analysis undertaken by the Carbon Trust and respective external technical contractors. Published: July 2020 The Carbon Trust’s mission is to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. It is a world leading expert on carbon reduction and clean technology. As a not-for-dividend group, it advises governments and leading companies around the world, reinvesting profits into its low carbon mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Birkett, Derek G
    SUBMISSION FROM DEREK G BIRKETT Security of Scotland’s Energy Supply Personal Introduction The author has had a lifetime of working experience in the electricity supply industry, retiring at the millenium after twenty years as a grid control engineer under both state and privatised operation. Previous experience on shift were on coal and hydro plant for a decade, with the CEGB and NofSHEB. A further decade was spent on project installation and commissioning at five power station locations across the UK of which two were coal and three nuclear including Dounreay PFR. The latter experience gave chartered status on a basis of an engineering degree from Leeds University. Upon retirement, commitment was given as a technical witness for two public inquiries opposing wind farm applications as well as being an independent witness at the strategic session of the Beauly/Denny public inquiry. In 2010 a book was published entitled ‘When will the Lights go out?’ leading to public presentations, three of which were held in London. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/917/0088330.pdf (page 72) Basic Principles As a commodity electricity cannot be stored to any degree and must therefore be produced on demand. As an essential service to modern society its provision is highly dependent upon a narrow field of specialised technical expertise. The unified GB Grid is a dynamic entity, inherently unstable. Transmission interconnection of various supply sources provide security and enable significant capital and operational savings. However bulk transmission of power brings power losses, mitigated by siting generation in proximity to consumer demand. Maintaining system balance on a continual basis is critical for system security, not just with active power but also reactive power that enables voltage (pressure) levels to be maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreham Harbour District Energy Feasibility Study Part 1 Report
    Shoreham Harbour District Energy Feasibility Study Part 1 Report The Carbon Trust is a world-leading organisation of 200 independent experts helping businesses, governments and the public sector to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. Our team of decentralised energy experts has extensive experience of supporting the public sector and private developers to bring heat network projects from concept through to construction, providing financial modelling, business model, stakeholder management, planning policy and technical support. We are active in a number of areas to unlock barriers and accelerate the deployment of heat networks and a member of the District Energy in Cities Initiative, a global SE4ALL accelerator programme. We operate at a world- wide level, with offices in London, Beijing, Johannesburg and Mexico City. Sustainable Energy Ltd was formed in 1998 to provide independent consultancy in the renewable and low carbon energy sector. Sustainable Energy specialises in district heating, cooling and power projects. They have provided heat mapping, energy masterplanning, heat network design and impartial technical support throughout installation and commissioning for over 50MW of both urban and rural district heating schemes. They have worked on district energy projects for a wide range of clients including Government departments, Local Authorities, Universities and large commercial clients. March 2018 Prepared for: Adur District Council Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Prepared by: Emma Ashcroft, Carbon Trust Dr Tanja Groth, Carbon Trust Charlie McNelly, Carbon Trust Dr Gabriel Gallagher, Sustainable Energy Lee Evans, Sustainable Energy Omied Khakshour, Sustainable Energy Dr Penny Challans, Sustainable Energy Adrien Grubb, Sustainable Energy Cover image is sourced from Pexels.com under the Creative Commons Zero licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Baseline Reviews for Offshore Renewables in Scottish Waters
    RPA. Marine Scotland Socio-economic Baseline Reviews for Offshore Renewables in Scottish Waters Volume 1: Main Text Report R.1905 September 2012 RPA. Marine Scotland Socio-economic Baseline Reviews for Offshore Renewables in Scottish Waters Volume 2: Figures Report R.1905 September 2012 Marine Scotland Socio-economic Baseline Reviews for Offshore Renewables in Scottish Waters Date: September 2012 Project Ref: R4032/3 Report No: R.1905 © ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Version Details of Change Authorised By Date 1 Working Copy C E Brown 02.12.11 2 Final C E Brown 07.02.12 3 Final C E Brown 26.04.12 4 Final C E Brown 28.06.12 5 Final C E Brown 24.09.12 Document Authorisation Signature Date Project Manager: C E Brown Quality Manager: H Roberts Project Director: S C Hull ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Quayside Suite, Medina Chambers Town Quay Tel: +44(0)23 8071 1840 SOUTHAMPTON Fax: +44(0)23 8071 1841 Hampshire Web: www.abpmer.co.uk SO14 2AQ Email: [email protected] ABPmer is certified by: All images copyright ABPmer apart from front cover (wave, anemone, bird) and policy & management (rockpool) Andy Pearson www.oceansedgephotography.co.uk Socio-economic Baseline Reviews for Offshore Renewables in Scottish Waters Summary ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd (ABPmer) and RPA were commissioned by Marine Scotland to prepare a baseline socio-economic review to inform impact assessments of future sectoral plans for offshore wind and wave and tidal energy in Scottish Territorial Waters and waters offshore of Scotland (hereafter „Scottish Waters‟). This report provides a national overview of socio-economic activities together with regional baseline reviews covering the six Scottish Offshore Renewable Energy Regions (SORERs).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Kirkcaldy & Mid Fife Local Plan
    DRAFT KIRKCALDY & MID FIFE LOCAL PLAN TPS SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF REPRESENTATIONS TO PlanningPlanning THE DRAFT KIRKCALDY & MID FIFE LOCAL PLAN CONSULTATION 2008 Report prepared for Fife Council Development Services by TPS Planning Ltd. APRIL 2009 TPS Planning Ltd. CBC House, 24 Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8EG. tel: 0131 272 2775 fax: 0131 272 2800 www.tpsplanning.com Contents Page REPORTH INTRODUCTION H 5 BackgroundH H 5 ResponsesH to the Consultation H 6 StructureH and Content of Report H 7 BriefH Overall Summary by Respondent GroupH 9 ExplanationH of Abbreviations used in this Report H 11 COMMENTSH ON GENERAL MATTERS, PRELIMINARY SECTIONS AND GLOSSARY H 13 GeneralH Comments on Draft Local Plan H 13 AlternativeH Languages and Formats H 17 GlossaryH H 18 ForewordH H 18 IntroductionH H 19 PolicyH Context H 20 COMMENTSH ON PLAN STATEMENT H 21 TheH Local Plan Development Strategy H 21 StrategicH Context H 23 StrategicH Locations H 26 SustainableH Development H 30 DevelopingH the Economy H 31 MeetingH Housing Needs H 33 SafeguardingH and Improving the Environment H 38 ProvidingH for Infrastructure and Community Needs H 40 DevelopingH the Transport Network H 41 Implementation,H Monitoring and Review H 42 COMMENTSH ON SETTLEMENT AND LANDWARD PLANS H 43 CommentsH on Settlement Plans IntroductionH 43 AuchtertoolH H 44 Ballingry,H Lochore, Crosshill & Glencraig H 45 BurntislandH H 49 Cardenden,H Dundonald, Auchterderran & Bowhill H 54 ClunyH H 58 CoaltownH of Wemyss H 59 Cowdenbeath,H Hill of Beath & Lumphinnans H 60 Crossgates,H Fordell &
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report 2010
    Fife Council – Scotland July 2010 2010 Air Quality Progress Report for Fife Council In fulfilment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management July 2010 Progress Report i July 2010 Fife Council – Scotland Title 2010 Air Quality Progress Report for Fife Council Customer Fife Council Customer reference AEAT/ENV/FIFEPRG2010 Confidentiality, copyright This report is the Copyright of AEA Technology plc and has been prepared by AEA and reproduction Technology plc under contract to Fife Council. The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of AEA Technology plc. AEA Technology plc accepts no liability whatsoever to any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed therein. File reference AEAT/ENV/R/2977 Reference number ED56066 AEA Glengarnock Technology Centre Caledonian Road Glengarnock Ayrshire KA14 3DD T: 0870 190 5301 F: 0870 190 5151 AEA is a business name of AEA Technology plc AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Author Name David Monaghan Approved by Name Scott Hamilton Signature Date 23.07.2010 ii Progress Report Fife Council – Scotland July 2010 Local Authority Douglas Mayne Officer Department Environmental Strategy Team Address Fife Council Environmental Services Kingdom House Kingdom Avenue Glenrothes Fife KY7 5LY Telephone 08451 555555. Ext. 493619 e-mail [email protected] Report Reference AEAT/ENV/R/2977 number Date 23/07/10 Progress Report iii July 2010 Fife Council – Scotland Executive Summary This Air Quality Progress Report has been prepared for Fife Council as part of the Local Air Quality Management (LAQM) system introduced in Part IV of the Environment Act 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Site & Surroundings
    SITE & SURROUNDINGS The Story of Cockenzie & Port Seton Cockenzie and Port Seton are virtually horse-drawn railway carrying coal from One of the more obvious recent synonymous. The two settlements have the pits around Tranent to the harbour at developments took place in the 1960s long merged into one another and on Cockenzie. when the Cockenzie Power Station was maps the whole phrase is used as a single built on the coastal site of a disused name. These days it is fair to think of them During the 1745 Jacobite uprising the coal mine just to the west of Cockenzie as one large village with two harbours: Battle of Prestonpans took place a mile and Port Seton. The site was chosen to Port Seton harbour being half a mile to the south of Cockenzie and close to the line of make use of the excellent coal supplies east of Cockenzie harbour. the waggonway. History was made when available locally, the good rail links, and the waggonway was used to transport the availability of seawater for cooling: Cockenzie was the first to be established. troops to the battle, marking the railway's hence the absence of cooling towers. The There had probably been a village around first ever use in warfare. Power Station was built partly on the site its natural harbour long before it was of the former Preston Links Colliery, with chartered as a burgh by James VI in Cockenzie was also home for many years northern elements of the site reclaimed 1591. It then grew as a convenient means to boatyards producing fishing vessels from the Firth of Forth to facilitate of exporting the coal being unearthed and yachts.
    [Show full text]