DOCSLIB.ORG

MALAYSIA Court Backlog and Delay Reduction Program a Progress Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MALAYSIA Court Backlog and Delay Reduction Program a Progress Report MALAYSIA Court Backlog and Delay Reduction Program A Progress Report August 2011 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit East Asia and Pacific Region Document of the World Bank Acronyms and Abbrevations AGC Attorney General’s Chambers B/F Balance Forward (pending cases transferred from one year to the next) C Civil (abbreviation for tables) CD Compact Disc CLE Continuing Legal Education CJ Chief Justice CMIS Court Management Information System CMS Case Management System CMU Case Management Unit COA Court of Appeal Cr Criminal (abbreviation for tables) CRT Court Recording and Transcription DfID Department for International Development DNAA Discharged not Amounting to Acquittal DPP Deputy Public Prosecutor GOM Government of Malaysia ICT Information and Communication Technology IEG Independent Evaluation Group IT Information Technology JL Service Judicial and Legal Service KL Kuala Lumpur L/A Leave to Appeal (abbreviation for tables) MJU Managing Judge Unit MIS Management Information System NCC New Commercial Court NCvC New Civil Court NEAC National Economic Advisory Council NKRA National Key Results Areas PEMANDU Performance Management and Delivery Unit RM Malaysian Ringgit ROL Rule of Law USAID United States Agency for International Development USD United States Dollar Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the World Bank in response to a request from the Malaysian Judiciary under the Fee-based Service arrangement. It is intended to be an objective assessment of the Federal Court’s recent reform program aimed at reducing case backlogs and improving efficiency in the judicial services. The report was written by Linn Hammergren consultant) under the direction of Yasuhiko Matsuda (Sr. Public Sector Specialist, EASPR, and Task Team Leader) and overall supervision of Mathew Verghis (Lead Economist for Malaysia, EASPR) and Rob- ert Taliercio (Lead Economist for Public Sector Management, EASPR). The peer reviewers were David Bernstein (Sr. Operations Officer, INTSC) and Barry Walsh (LEGJR). The team acknowledges the generous cooperation extended to the Bank missions by the Federal Court as well as the National Economic Advisory Council and the Economic Planning Unit. It is especially grateful to Chief Justice Zaki Azmi for facilitating the meetings within the Judiciary and with other organizations; to his assistant, Mohd Aizuddin bin Zolkeply for setting up appointments and accompanying the consultant to all meetings; to other Justices of the Federal Court and especially Chief Judge of Malaya, Arifin Zakaria, and Justices James Foong Yuen, Raus Sharif, Abdull Hamid Embong, and Suriyadi Halim Omar for taking part in interviews and ensuring that their staff was available; to members of the Court’s administrative offices and especially Hashim Hamzah, Chief Regis- trar; to the registrars and judges of the Kuala Lumpur and Shah Alam High Courts; and to members of the National Economic Advisory Council, the Legal Affairs Division and the Performance Management and Delivery Unit (PE- MANDU) of the Prime Minister’s Department, and the President of the Bar Council, Ragunath Kesavan. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... i INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER I: BACKGROUND ON MALAYSIA, ITS LEGAL SYSTEM AND JUDICIAL ORGANIZATION ......................... 2 Country Background ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Judicial Organization, Staffing, and Resource Allocations ............................................................................. 3 CHAPTER II: THE REFORM PROGRAM: 2008 TO PRESENT .................................................................................. 15 Reform History and Overview of Objectives ................................................................................................... 15 Strategy ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Reform Components ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Next Steps ..................................................................................................................................................... 36 Additional Reform Elements outside the Court Program ............................................................................. 37 Corruption ..................................................................................................................................................... 42 CHAPTER III: ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE 2008-2011 REFORM ............................................................................... 43 Key Indicators of Results as Used Internationally and as Adapted to the Malaysian Program ..................... 44 Other Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 56 Further Recommendations as Regards Further Data Collection and Statistical Reports ................................ 59 CHAPTER IV: LOOKING AHEAD ........................................................................................................................... 61 Areas Already Targeted to Complete the First Phase Reforms and for Work on the Proposed Second Phase ............................................................................................................................ 61 Areas Suggested for Immediate Attention or for Inclusion in Future Programs ........................................... 64 Suggestions for Additional In-Depth Studies and Assessments .................................................................... 70 Administrative Tribunals (and Other Non-Judicial Dispute Resolution Forums) ........................................... 74 Conclusions on Next Steps ............................................................................................................................ 75 CHAPTER V: IN CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 77 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................................... 80 List of Figures Figure 1: Basic Structure of Federal Judiciary ....................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2: Comparison of Disposal of A-Track Cases, High Court Civil Division, KL ................................................ 53 Figure 3: Comparison of Disposal of T-Track Cases, High Court, Civil Division, KL ............................................... 53 Figure 4: Modes of Disposal for KL NCC Cases, September-December, 2009 ...................................................... 57 Figure 5: Percentage of Postponements by Parties, Criminal Cases, Kuala Lumpur, Sessions Court, July 2010 ................................................................................................................................. 58 Figure 6: Percentage of Postponements by Parties, Civil Cases, Kuala Lumpur, Sessions Court, July 201 ........... 58 List of Tables Table 1: Judicial Positions, Authorized and Filled, as of 2011 .............................................................................. 6 Table 2: Comparison of Judges-to-Population Ratio, Selected Countries ............................................................ 7 Table 3: Budgets for Judiciary, 2008-2011, in RM ................................................................................................ 12 Table 4: Comparison of PEMANDU Backlog Reduction Targets for 2010 and Court Backlog Statistics (Violent Crimes Only) ....................................................................................................................................... 41 Table 5: Backlogged Pending Cases for All Courts, End of 2009 and 2010; Numbers of “Backlogged” Cases (those filed before 2009) Still in Courtroom Files ............................................................................................ 46 Table 6: Ageing Lists by Year – All Trial Courts, Civil Cases, 2009-April 2011 ....................................................... 47 Table 7: End of Year Ageing Lists - All Trial Courts, Criminal Cases, 2009-April 2011 .......................................... 48 Table 8: Clearance Rates for Courts by Instance, for 2007-2010 ......................................................................... 49 Table 9: Comparison of Carryover, New Filings, and Dispositions – All Courts, 2009-April 2011 ........................ 50 Table 10: Monthly Pending Cases - New Commercial Court, Kuala Lumpur, September 2009-April 2011 .......... 55 Table 11: Monthly Pending Cases - New Civil Court Kuala Lumpur, October 2010-April 2011 ............................ 56 MALAYSIA Court Backlog and Delay Reduction Program F i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 1. This study reviews the initial results of efforts by the Federal Court of Malaysia to improve judicial performance, especially in the areas of backlog and delay
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Persatuan Geologi Malaysia
    WARTA GEOLOGI GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALAYSIA PERSATUAN GEOLOGI MALAYSIA Jilid 47 APRIL Volume 47 No. 1 2021 No. 1 ISSN 0126 - 5539; e-ISSN 2682 - 7549 PP2509/07/2013(032786) RM 70.50 Warta Geologi PERSATUAN GEOLOGI MALAYSIA Editor Wan Hasiah Abdullah Geological Society of Malaysia Geological Society of Malaysia, Malaysia Council 2020/2021 Editorial Board Azman A. Ghani President : Abd. Rasid Jaapar University of Malaya, Malaysia Vice President : Ahmad Nizam Hasan Harry Doust Secretary : Farah Fazulah Abdullah Assistant Secretary : Norazianti Asmari Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands Treasurer : Lim Choun Sian Robert Hall Editor : Wan Hasiah Abdullah University of London, UK Immediate Past President : Mazlan Madon Howard Johnson Councillors : Ahmad Tariq Ahmad Ziyad Imperial College London, UK Awg Mohd Faizal Awg Mohamad Hamssin Ibrahim Komoo Maryam Syazana Dzulkefli Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia Tan Chun Hock Alfredo Lagmay Joy Jacqueline Pereira University of the Philippines, the Philippines Nur Iskandar Taib Lee Chai Peng Tan Boon Kong Yunus Abdul Razak University of Malaya, Malaysia Ian Metcalfe The Geological Society of Malaysia (GSM) was founded in 1967 University of New England, Australia with the aim of promoting the advancement of geoscience, Mohd. Nawawi Mohd. Nordin particularly in Malaysia and Southeast Asia. The Society has a membership of about 700 geoscientists based in Malaysia Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia as well as abroad. Ng Tham Fatt Warta Geologi is published three times yearly (April, August, University of Malaya, Malaysia December) by the Society. Warta Geologi publishes peer- Peter R. Parham reviewed short geological communications and original research on Earth Science. The scope includes local and regional Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia geology, conservation geology, economic geology, engineering Joy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Law in a Plural Society: Malaysian Experience Zaki Azmi
    BYU Law Review Volume 2012 | Issue 3 Article 1 9-1-2012 Law in a Plural Society: Malaysian Experience Zaki Azmi Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Human Geography Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Zaki Azmi, Law in a Plural Society: Malaysian Experience, 2012 BYU L. Rev. 689 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2012/iss3/1 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 01-AZMI.FIN (DO NOT DELETE) 2/8/2013 2:39 PM Law in a Plural Society: Malaysian Experience Address Given by Former Chief Justice of Malaysia, Zaki Azmi* I. INTRODUCTION This paper concentrates mainly on how Malaysia, a country composed of many races and religions, creates and enforces its laws in order to sustain the peace that has lasted more than half a century. I have recently retired as a judge, so my view on this subject is from a judge’s perspective. Malaysia is located just north of the equator, about halfway around the world from Utah. It is geographically divided into two main regions by the South China Sea. These two regions are the Peninsula Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak. Peninsula Malaysia was known as Malaya, but in 1963, the British colonies
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Malaysian Judiciary
    JOURNAL JOURNAL OFJOURNAL JUDICIARY MALAYSIAN THE OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY July 2020 January 2019 Barcode ISSN 0127-9270 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY July 2020 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY MODE OF CITATION Month [Year] JMJ page ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE Publication Secretary, Judicial Appointments Commission Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya www.jac.gov.my Tel: 603-88803546 Fax: 603-88803549 2020 © Judicial Appointments Commission, Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya, Malaysia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any material form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Views expressed by contributors in this Journal are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Malaysian Judiciary, Judicial Appointments Commission or Malaysian Judicial Academy. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the information contained in this work is correct, the publisher, the editor, the contributors and the Academy disclaim all liability and responsibility for any error or omission in this publication, and in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any person in reliance, whether wholly or partially, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter II the Method of Appointment of Judges to the Superior Courts of Malaysia Under the Federal Constitution and the Judicia
    Chapter II The Method of Appointment of Judges to the Superior Courts of Malaysia Under the Federal Constitution and the Judicial Appointments Commission Despite the fact that the question of performing judicial functions independently by judges comes after their appointment, the method of appointment of judges is the crucial and dominant factor to ensure their substantive independence, the independence which greatly depends upon the independent character, integrity, equanimity, legal knowledge and keen intellect of the persons who would hold the office of judges. For, the appointment of a judge on account of political allegiance in utter disregard to the questions of his qualifications, merit, ability, competency, integrity and earlier performance as an advocate or judicial officer may bring in, to use the words of President Roosevelt, ‘Spineless Judges’ who can hardly be expected to dispense justice independently according to law and their own sense of justice without regard to the wishes and desire of the government of the day. There is a great possibility that such a judge may remain ‘indebted to those responsible for his designation ...., the beneficiary is exposed to the human temptation to repay his debt by a pliable conduct of his office’137 especially when the executive itself is a litigant. As H. J. Laski aptly said, ‘It is not necessary to suggest that there will be conscious unfairness; but it is .... possible that such judges will, particularly in cases where the liberty of the subject is concerned’, find themselves unconsciously biased through over-appreciation of executive difficulty...’138 Therefore, ‘in appointing judges, a government owes a duty to the people ..
    [Show full text]
  • Yong Tshu Khin & Anor V Dahan Cipta Sdn Bhd & Anor and Other Appeals [2020] MLJU 1983
    Yong Tshu Khin & Anor v Dahan Cipta Sdn Bhd & Anor and other appeals [2020] MLJU 1983 Malayan Law Journal Unreported FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA) TENGKU MAIMUN TUAN MAT CHIEF JUSTICE, ZABARIAH YUSOF, HASNAH MOHAMMED HASHIM, HARMINDAR SINGH DHALIWAL AND RHODZARIAH BUJANG FCJJ CIVIL APPLICATION NO 08(RS)-3-08 OF 2018(W), 08(RS)-6-08 OF 2018(W), 08(RS)-7-08 OF 2018(W), 08(RS)- 12-10 OF 2018(B), 08(RS)-13-11 OF 2018(W), 08(RS)-14-11 OF 2018(A) AND 08(RS)-17-12 OF 2018(W) 30 November 2020 Loh Siew Cheang (Verene Tan Yeen Yi, Goh Ee Voon, Ling Young Tuen, Samantha Su Xiu Ming and Hazel Ling Ai Wenn with him) (Lee Ling & Partners) in Civil Application No 08(RS)-3-08 of 2018(W), 08(RS)-6-08 of 2018(W) and 08(RS)-7-08 of 2018(W) for the applicants. Gopal Sri Ram (S Ravenesan, Siti Nuramirah bt Azman, How Li Nee and Marcus Lee with him) (S Ravenesan) in Civil Application No 08(RS)-12-10 of 2018(B) for the applicant. Wong Rhen Yen (Jamie Wong, Wong Li Yan and Shugan Raman with him)(Jamie Wong) in Civil Application No 08(RS)-13-11 of 2018(W) for the applicant. Cecil Abraham (Rishwant Singh, Pramjit Singh, Harjit Singh, Shopna Rani MalRamkarpal Singh (Harshaan Zamani and Rayveni Asogan with him) (Karpal Singh & Co) in Civil Application No 08(RS)-14-11 of 2018(A) for the applicant. Sitpah Selvaratnam (Ganesan Nethi and Siah Ching Joe with her) (Karpal Singh & Co) in Civil Application No 08(RS)-17-12 of 2018(W) for the applicants.
    [Show full text]
  • Class and Politics in Malaysian and Singaporean Nation Building
    CLASS AND POLITICS IN MALAYSIAN AND SINGAPOREAN NATION BUILDING Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor, M.A. Political Science College of Business, Government and Law Flinders University Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2017 Page Left Deliberately Blank. Abstract This study endeavours to deliver an alternative account of the study of nation-building by examining the subject matter eclectically from diverse standpoints, predominantly that of class in Southeast Asia which is profoundly dominated by ‘cultural’ perspectives. Two states in the region, Malaysia and Singapore, have been selected to comprehend and appreciate the nature of nation-building in these territories. The nation-building processes in both of the countries have not only revolved around the national question pertaining to the dynamic relations between the states and the cultural contents of the racial or ethnic communities in Malaysia and Singapore; it is also surrounded, as this thesis contends, by the question of class - particularly the relations between the new capitalist states’ elites (the rulers) and their masses (the ruled). More distinctively this thesis perceives nation-building as a project by political elites for a variety of purposes, including elite entrenchment, class (re)production and regime perpetuation. The project has more to do with ‘class-(re)building’ and ‘subject- building’ rather than ‘nation-building’. Although this thesis does not eliminate the significance of culture in the nation-building process in both countries; it is explicated that cultures were and are heavily employed to suit the ruling class’s purpose. Hence, the cultural dimension shall be used eclectically with other perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Th ADVOCACY SKILLS SEMINAR
    10 CPD POINTS th ADVOCACY SKILLS8 - 9th April 2017 - Boulevard SEMINAR Hotel, Kuala Lumpur Advocacy is the art of persuasion. Most law schools teach this subject but only to a certain level due to limited time and lack of experienced teachers in this practical field. Thus, this subject is often left to individuals desiring to do “court work” to devise their own proficiency. But before you can develop your own skill, you must know some basic fundamental rules, guidelines and practises as well as the pitfalls and the narrow alleys to avoid. Many are left to learn these from their seniors but unless these seniors are themselves well honed in the craft, it is most likely a case of “the blind leading the blind” or the acquisition of a skill that is incomplete or unrefined. This seminar intends to enlighten participants to not only the basic skills of advocacy but also to the finer points and techniques often missed, overlooked and neglected or perhaps forgotten by trial lawyers. Speakers for this seminar comprises of current Judges, retired Judges and senior practising advocates. Some of those from the Bench had been active advocates before their elevation. By virtue of their experience, they have an added advantage of being able to identify common errors and mistakes committed by advocates appearing before them. They will be highlighting these and rendering suggestions and proposals to overcome them. This is one seminar that should not be missed by anyone who wishes to advance his or her advocacy skill. It is meant to enlighten you not only to the basic foundation of this craft but also share with you the various techniques that can be adopted into a winning style of your own.
    [Show full text]
  • English Common Law and Rules of Equity Hear Cases
    MALAYSIA Court Backlog and Public Disclosure Authorized Delay Reduction Program A Progress Report August 2011 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit East Asia and Pacific Region Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Acronyms and Abbrevations AGC Attorney General’s Chambers B/F Balance Forward (pending cases transferred from one year to the next) C Civil (abbreviation for tables) CD Compact Disc CLE Continuing Legal Education CJ Chief Justice CMIS Court Management Information System CMS Case Management System CMU Case Management Unit COA Court of Appeal Cr Criminal (abbreviation for tables) CRT Court Recording and Transcription DfID Department for International Development DNAA Discharged not Amounting to Acquittal DPP Deputy Public Prosecutor GOM Government of Malaysia ICT Information and Communication Technology IEG Independent Evaluation Group IT Information Technology JL Service Judicial and Legal Service KL Kuala Lumpur L/A Leave to Appeal (abbreviation for tables) MJU Managing Judge Unit MIS Management Information System NCC New Commercial Court NCvC New Civil Court NEAC National Economic Advisory Council NKRA National Key Results Areas PEMANDU Performance Management and Delivery Unit RM Malaysian Ringgit ROL Rule of Law USAID United States Agency for International Development USD United States Dollar Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the World Bank in response to a request from the Malaysian Judiciary under the Fee-based Service arrangement. It is intended to be an objective assessment of the Federal Court’s recent reform program aimed at reducing case backlogs and improving efficiency in the judicial services. The report was written by Linn Hammergren consultant) under the direction of Yasuhiko Matsuda (Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Government’s Powers During an Emergency Zaki Azmi* Abstract This write-up looks into the political situation that existed in Malaysia commencing with the 2018 General Election when Pakatan Harapan toppled the long-established Barisan Nasional and thereafter fall of Pakatan Harapan (PH) Government in 2020. Thereafter the Perikatan Nasional (PN) led by Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin took over the government. The PN Government was accused of being a back-door government. Immediately after PN took over the Government, the world, including Malaysia, faced the Covid-19 pandemic. At the same time, the PN Government, which included UMNO and PAS, had only a very small majority in Parliament. The issue of the Government invoking the Emergency powers under Article 150 of the Federal Constitution was extensively discussed amongst the politicians and writers. Article 150 became very relevant. A major part of this write-up (which is supported by legal authorities) involves the legality of the Government invoking Article 150 towards fighting the Covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Keywords: Article 150, Federal Constitution, Emergency Powers, Covid-19, Election Introduction Our Federal Constitution was drafted by the Reid Commission and enacted immediately prior to our independence in 1957 for the then Federation of Malaya. In 1963 it was extended to the Federation of Malaysia with appropriate additions and modifications. Our Constitution is the supreme law of the Federation, and any law which is inconsistent with it shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.1 There are some exceptions to this rule of constitutional supremacy. One of them is * Tun Dato’ Seri Zaki Tun Azmi is a former Chief Justice of Malaysia and currently holds the Chief Justice of the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulaiman Bin Takrib V Kerajaan Negeri Terengganu (Kerajaan a Malaysia, Intervener) and Other Applications
    354 Malayan Law Journal [2009] 6 MLJ Sulaiman bin Takrib v Kerajaan Negeri Terengganu (Kerajaan A Malaysia, intervener) and other applications FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA) — PETITION NOS 1 OF 2006, 1 OF B 2007 AND 2 OF 2007 ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD CHIEF JUSTICE, ZAKI AZMI PCA AND ZULKEFLI FCJ 26 SEPTEMBER 2008 C Constitutional Law — Legislation — Validity of impugned legislation — Declaration that impugned provisions were null and void, application for — Whether Fatwa Committee empowered to create offences — Whether offences created against ‘the precepts of Islam’ — Syariah Criminal Offences (Takzir) D (Terengganu) Enactment 2001 ss 10 & 14 — Administration of Islamic Religious Affairs (Terengganu) Enactment 2001 ss 50 & 51 — Syariah Criminal Offences (State of Selangor) Enactment 1995 ss 7, 8(a), 10(b), 12(c), 13 & 16(1)(a) E Islamic Law — Legislation — Validity of impugned legislation — Declaration that impugned provisions were null and void, application for — Whether Fatwa Committee empowered to create offences — Whether offences created against ‘the precepts of Islam’ — Syariah Criminal Offences (Takzir) (Terengganu) F Enactment 2001 ss 10 & 14 — Administration of Islamic Religious Affairs (Terengganu) Enactment 2001 ss 50 & 51 — Syariah Criminal Offences (State of Selangor) Enactment 1995 ss 7, 8(a), 10(b), 12(c), 13 & 16(1)(a) G Words and Phrases — ‘The precepts of Islam’ — Whether term ‘the precepts of Islam’ was to be confined to five pillars of Islam — Federal Constitution Ninth Schedule, List II, item 1 H This judgment was in respect of three separate petitions, namely, Petition No 1 of 2006 (‘the first petition’), Petition No 1 of 2007 (‘the second petition’) and Petition No 2 of 2007 (‘the third petition’), which were heard together because they involved similar issues.
    [Show full text]
  • SUA2014/SKR/0050 A-1-09, Merchant Square RUJUKAN ANDA: - No
    ! Parti Keadilan Rakyat RUJUKAN KAMI: SUA2014/SKR/0050 A-1-09, Merchant Square RUJUKAN ANDA: - No. 1, Jalan Tropicana Selatan 1 47410 Petaling Jaya TARIKH: 4 Ogos 2014 TELEFON: +603 7885 0530 FAKS: +603 7885 0531 E-MAIL: [email protected] YBhg Dato’ Mustafa Ali LAMAN WEB: www.keadilanrakyat.org Setiausaha Agung Parti Islam Se-Malaysia Pejabat Agung No 318-A Jalan Raja Laut 50350 Kuala Lumpur YBhg Dato’, PENCALONAN YB DATO’ SERI DR WAN AZIZAH WAN ISMAIL SEBAGAI MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR Saya mendoakan perjuangan kita terus mendapat petunjuk dan rahmat Allah SWT demi harapan rakyat yang kita pikul bersama. Berikutan perbincangan berterusan mengenai keputusan KEADILAN mencalonkan YB Dato’ Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor yang baru, saya telah mengunjungi beberapa pimpinan termasuklah YBhg Dato’ Bentara Setia Haji Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, Tuan Haji Mohamad Bin Sabu, Dato’ Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man dan Dato’ Haji Husam Musa sepanjang minggu lepas. Pada akhir pertemuan yang diadakan saya memahami ada keperluan untuk KEADILAN memberikan beberapa penjelasan dan menerangkan isu berbangkit yang mendorong kepada keputusan KEADILAN mencalonkan Dato’ Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor yang baru. Sesuai dengan semangat itu, untuk mengelakkan pelbagai tohmah dan versi yang berlainan yang sampai kepada pimpinan PAS sehingga menimbulkan kesukaran untuk mengetahui apakah sebab sebenarnya keputusan KEADILAN untuk menukar Menteri Besar Selangor dibuat, bersama-sama ini saya sertakan laporan ringkas berserta rujukan yang berkenaan yang merumuskan beberapa peristiwa dan tindakan yang menjadi antara sebab musabab utama KEADILAN secara konsensus mengambil keputusan menggantikan kepimpinan Menteri Besar Selangor sedia ada. Saya memohon jasa baik YBhg Dato’ untuk memanjangkan laporan ini kepada keseluruhan AJK PAS Pusat yang akan bermesyuarat pada 10 Ogos 2014 mengenai perkara ini.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Brooms by Malik Imtiaz Sarwar
    The new brooms By Malik Imtiaz Sarwar We have a new team heading the judiciary. Congratulations to Chief Justice Tan Sri Ariffin Zakaria, President of the Court of Appeal Tan Sri Md Raus Sharif and Chief Malik Imtiaz Sarwar Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin. They are all men with many years of experience in the judicial and legal services. They are also men who, having started their careers as judges in the High Court, have had the opportunity to gain invaluable insights into not only the mechanics of being a judge, but also the workings of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. I believe they are fully equipped to deal with the challenge of managing one of the most important institutions of the nation and wish them well in their endeavour. It is my hope that these three judges and their colleague, Chief Judge Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Richard Malanjum, see in this ''changing of the guard'' the opportunity that presents itself to make major inroads into restoring public confidence in the judiciary and seize it. For this to happen, however, they must acknowledge, even if only to themselves, that public confidence is not as high as it ought to be and as it was in the late 1980s, and that steps need be taken to address the situation. In some quarters, there are those who, admittedly somewhat cynically, suggest that although in the early days of the new appointments there will be some attempt to play to the gallery, such efforts will soon fade into obscurity.
    [Show full text]