DOCSLIB.ORG

The Military and Democratization in Africa: a Case Study of Burundi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Military and Democratization in Africa: a Case Study of Burundi University of Nairobi Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies The Military and Democratization in Africa: A Case Study of Burundi By Jean Bosco Ndayikengurukiye Supervisor: Prof. Peter Kagwanja Research Proposal submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for the Award of Master’s Degree in International Studies at the Institute for Diplomacy and International Studies (IDIS), University of Nairobi. NOVEMBER, 2016 Declaration This project is my own original work and to the best of my knowledge has not been presented for examination in any other university or any other award. Name: Jean Bosco Ndayikengurukiye Registration No: R50/82651/2015 Signature: ___________________________ Date: ___________________________ The project has been submitted for examination with my approval as the university supervisor. Name: Professor Peter Kagwanja Signature: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________ ii Dedication This project is dedicated to my family whose patience, support and encouragement have been my motivation. Special thanks to my lovely wife Marie Therese Barankenguje, my children Alain Jodel Mugisha, Christa Liesse Iradukunda, Aurore Arielle Ndayikengurukiye, and Jean Arlin Dushime. For their prayers, love and encouragement, I say thank you. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank with deep gratitude all the people who in one way or another had contributed towards the success of this research project. I am indeed in debt to many people, some of whom I may unwillingly omit here. First of all, I would appreciate and thank the Government of the Republic of Burundi, Ministry of Defence, for having accorded me this golden opportunity to study in Kenya‟s precious National Defence College during the year 2015/2016. My sincere gratitude also goes to the Commandant of National Defence College Lieutenant General J.Waweru, the Deputy Commandant Military, Major General Ikenye, and Brigadier Mulata, Senior Directing Staff – Kenya Air Force who gave me invaluable advice towards this research. My sincere thanks go to my supervisor, Professor Peter Kagwanja of the Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies – Nairobi University, for giving me guidance and encouragement. Without him, completion of this thesis would not have been possible. Similarly, I thank all my lecturers in the Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies (IDIS) for the quality academic discourse during all our interactions. My special thanks go to my family, my wife, and my children for all their patience and encouragement. iv Abstract The role of the military in democratization process in Africa depicts a stark image on the extent to which the military has been effectively utilized in the past as well as during the current period. In some cases, the military has been used to propagate fear and to commit atrocities in Africa. However, over the last two decades, the military in Africa has been involved in efforts to quell civil strife and to promote peace, stability and democracy. In this regard, this paper focuses on the concept of post-colonial democratic experience in Africa, and how the military has been involved in this process. The study will specifically seek to identify the involvement of the military as an institution that has promoted democracy in Africa, with specific reference to Burundi. In Burundi, democracy was ruthlessly suppressed in 1993, when army extremists assassinated the first freely elected president, sparking waves of retaliatory ethnic violence that later subsided, but not yet ended, despite positive developments in the political transition process. On revisiting this case and the available literature on the continent‟s democratic process, the study intends to draw conclusions on how the military has helped to promote democracy in Africa, the challenges encountered, and the way forward in future. It is the view of this study that the military has positively contributed to the promotion of democracy in Africa, despite the myriad of challenges encountered in the process. This is appreciating the fact the liberal democracy as interpreted in the dominant western models may not be applicable in the continent as understood from such a perspective. As such, the adopted perspective of democracy in Africa will be interpreted from varied interpretations depending on the manner in which it has been implemented. v Table of Contents Declaration ...................................................................................................................................... ii Dedication ...................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iv Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... vi Abbreviations and Accronyms ..................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.0. Background of the Study ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Problem Statement of the Study .............................................................................................. 2 1.2. Objectives of the Study ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3. Research Question or Hypothesis of the Study........................................................................ 3 1.4. Literature Review..................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. The case of Burundi .............................................................................................................. 6 1.5. Justification .............................................................................................................................. 8 1.6. Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................................ 9 1.7. Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.8 Chapter Outline ....................................................................................................................... 13 The Military and Democratization Process in Africa ................................................................... 15 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 15 2.2. Historical Perspective ............................................................................................................ 16 2.2.1. Democracy in Africa ........................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2. Role of Military Institutions in Africa. ............................................................................... 19 2.3. Conceptual Perspective .......................................................................................................... 22 2.3.1. Role of military in promoting democracy in Africa ........................................................... 23 2.3.2. Civil-military relations in Africa ........................................................................................ 28 2.3.3. The Role of the African Union ........................................................................................... 29 2.3.4. African Union‟s Constitutional and Institutional structures ............................................... 30 2.3.5. Conflict Transformation Theory and Protracted Social Conflict theory ............................ 33 CHAPTER THREE ...................................................................................................................... 36 Military Intervention in Democracy in Burundi ........................................................................... 36 3.1. The Burundi Civil war ........................................................................................................... 37 vi 3. 1.1. From independence to La Baule convention. .................................................................... 37 3. 1.2. Political Evolution of Burundi ........................................................................................... 38 3. 2. The Role of the Military ....................................................................................................... 41 3. 3. Role of Other Stakeholders ................................................................................................... 42 3.4. Mediation Efforts ................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.1. Rome talks .......................................................................................................................... 44 3.4.2. Julius Nyerere‟s facilitation ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: the Last Situation Report Was Dated November 18, 2002
    U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU FOR DEMOCRACY, CONFLICT, AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE (DCHA) OFFICE OF U.S. FOREIGN DISASTER ASSISTANCE (OFDA) BURUNDI – Complex Emergency Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: The last situation report was dated November 18, 2002. BACKGROUND The Tutsi minority, which represents 14 percent of Burundi’s 6.85 million people, has dominated the country politically, militarily, and economically since national independence in 1962. Approximately 85 percent of Burundi’s population is Hutu, and approximately one percent is Twa (Batwa). The current cycle of violence began in October 1993 when members within the Tutsi-dominated army assassinated the first freely elected President, Melchoir Ndadaye (Hutu), sparking Hutu-Tutsi fighting. Ndadaye’s successor, Cyprien Ntariyama (Hutu), was killed in a plane crash on April 6, 1994, alongside Rwandan President Habyarimana. Sylvestre Ntibantunganya (Hutu) took power and served as President until July 1996, when a military coup d’etat brought current President Pierre Buyoya (Tutsi) to power. Since 1993, an estimated 300,000 Burundians have been killed. In August 2000, nineteen Burundian political parties signed the Peace and Reconciliation Agreement in Arusha, Tanzania, overseen by peace process facilitator, former South African President Nelson Mandela. The Arusha Peace Accords include provisions for an ethnically balanced army and legislature, and for democratic elections to take place after three years of transitional government. The three-year transition period began on November 1, 2001. President Pierre Buyoya is serving as president for the first 18 months of the transition period, to be followed in May 2003 by a Hutu president for the final 18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi: the Issues at Stake
    BURUNDI: THE ISSUES AT STAKE. POLITICAL PARTIES, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND POLITICAL PRISONERS 12 July 2000 ICG Africa Report N° 23 Nairobi/Brussels (Original Version in French) Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................i INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1 I. POLITICAL PARTIES: PURGES, SPLITS AND CRACKDOWNS.........................1 A. Beneficiaries of democratisation turned participants in the civil war (1992-1996)3 1. Opposition groups with unclear identities ................................................. 4 2. Resorting to violence to gain or regain power........................................... 7 B. Since the putsch: dangerous games of the government................................... 9 1. Purge of opponents to the peace process (1996-1998)............................ 10 2. Harassment of militant activities ............................................................ 14 C. Institutionalisation of political opportunism................................................... 17 1. Partisan putsches and alliances of convenience....................................... 18 2. Absence of fresh political attitudes......................................................... 20 D. Conclusion ................................................................................................. 23 II WHICH FREEDOM FOR WHAT MEDIA ?...................................................... 25 A. Media
    [Show full text]
  • Stoking the Fires
    STOKING THE FIRES Military Assistance and Arms Trafficking in Burundi Human Rights Watch Arms Project Human Rights Watch New York AAA Washington AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 December 1997 by Human Rights Watch All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-177-0 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 97-80896 Human Rights Watch Arms Project The Human Rights Watch Arms Project was established in 1992 to monitor and prevent arms transfers to governments or organizations that commit gross violations of internationally recognized human rights and the rules of war and promote freedom of information regarding arms transfers worldwide. Joost R. Hiltermann is the director; Stephen D. Goose is the program director; Loretta Bondì is the Advocacy Coordinator; Andrew Cooper, and Ernst Jan Hogendoorn are research assistants; Rebecca Bell is the associate; William M. Arkin, Kathi L. Austin, Dan Connell, Monica Schurtman, and Frank Smyth are consultants. Torsten N. Wiesel is the chair of the board and Nicole Ball and Vincent McGee are the vice-chairs. Addresses for Human Rights Watch 485 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017-6104 Tel: (212) 972-8400, Fax: (212) 972-0905, E-mail: [email protected] 1522 K Street, N.W., #910, Washington, DC 20005-1202 Tel: (202) 371-6592, Fax: (202) 371-0124, E-mail: [email protected] 33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: [email protected] 15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail: [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org Listserv address: To subscribe to the list, send an e-mail message to [email protected] with Asubscribe hrw-news@ in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank).
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi Conflict Insight | Feb 2018 | Vol
    IPSS Peace & Security Report ABOUT THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to provide analysis and recommendations to assist the African Union (AU), Burundi Conflict Regional Economic Communities (RECs), Member States and Development Partners in decision making and in the implementation of peace and security- related instruments. Insight CONTRIBUTORS Dr. Mesfin Gebremichael (Editor in Chief) Mr. Alagaw Ababu Kifle Ms. Alem Kidane Mr. Hervé Wendyam Ms. Mahlet Fitiwi Ms. Zaharau S. Shariff EDITING, DESIGN & LAYOUT Michelle Mendi Muita (Editor) Situation analysis Mikias Yitbarek (Design & Layout) Since gaining independence in 1962, Burundi has experienced several violent conflicts, including a civil war that took place between 1993 and © 2018 Institute for Peace and Security Studies, 2005. The common denominator of these conflicts was the politicization of Addis Ababa University. All rights reserved. divisions between the Hutu and Tutsi ethnic groups. The civil war was triggered by the assassination of the first democratically elected president, Melchior Ndadaye, by Tutsi elements in a failed attempt to overthrow the February 2018 | Vol. 1 government. The civil war is estimated to have caused more than 300,000 deaths and over 1 million displacements. In order to bring the civil war to CONTENTS an end, three major agreements were signed with varying degrees of Situation analysis 1 success, namely, the 1994 Convention of Government, the 2000 Arusha Causes of the conflict 2 Peace and Reconciliation Agreement,i and the 2004 Burundi Power-Sharing Actors 3 Agreement. Dynamics of the conflict 5 Scenarios 6 Current response assessment 6 Strategic options 7 Timeline 9 References 11 i In an attempt to bring the civil war to an end, Julius Nyerere (former President of Tanzania) and Nelson Mandela (former President of South Africa), facilitated a lengthy negotiation between the Hutus and the Tutsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World - Burundi (2011)
    http://www.freedomhouse.org/inc/content/pubs/fiw/inc_country_detail.cf... Print Freedom in the World - Burundi (2011) Capital: Bujumbura Political Rights Score: 5 * Civil Liberties Score: 5 * Population: 8,303,000 Status: Partly Free Ratings Change Burundi’s political rights rating declined from 4 to 5 due to arrests and intimidation by the government and ruling party during local, parliamentary, and presidential election campaigns. Overview Local, presidential, and parliamentary elections were held in May, June, and July 2010, respectively. Irregularities in local elections and efforts by President Pierre Nkurunziza’s National Council for the Defense of Democracy (CNDD)to close political space led opposition candidates to boycott the subsequent presidential and parliamentary elections. Sporadic political violence occurred throughout the electoral period, with the CNDD and opposition parties accusing one another of complicity in the attacks. The minority Tutsi ethnic group governed Burundi for most of the period since independence from Belgium in 1962. The military, judiciary, education system, business sector, and news media have also traditionally been dominated by the Tutsi. Violence between them and the majority Hutu has broken out repeatedly since independence. A 1992 constitution introduced multiparty politics, but the 1993 assassination of the newly elected Hutu president, Melchior Ndadaye of the Front for Democracy in Burundi (FRODEBU) party, resulted in sustained and widespread ethnic violence. Ndadaye’s successor was killed
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr
    UNITED NATIONS S Security Council Distr. GENERAL S/1995/157 24 February 1995 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH LETTER DATED 23 FEBRUARY 1995 FROM THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ADDRESSED TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL In response to the request by the Council, I have the honour to forward herewith the report of the preparatory fact-finding mission to Burundi by Ambassador Martin Huslid (Norway) and Ambassador Simeon Aké (Côte d’Ivoire), dated 20 May 1994. (Signed) Boutros BOUTROS-GHALI 95-05359 (E) 020395 /... S/1995/157 English Page 2 Annex [Original: French] REPORT OF THE PREPARATORY FACT-FINDING MISSION TO BURUNDI TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1 - 30 4 II. THE COUP D’ETAT OF 21 OCTOBER 1993 ................... 31 - 102 10 A. Historical background to the coup d’état ......... 31 - 45 10 B. Events of the coup d’état ........................ 46 - 77 13 C. The perpetrators of the failed coup d’etat ....... 78 - 83 17 D. The management of the crisis ..................... 84 - 102 17 III. THE MASSACRES ........................................ 103 - 133 19 A. The massacres .................................... 103 - 114 19 B. The causes of the massacres ...................... 115 - 130 21 C. The role of provincial administrators and the army 131 - 133 23 IV. EVENTS AFTER THE COUP D’ETAT AND THE MASSACRES - PRESENT SITUATION .................................... 134 - 148 23 V. CHALLENGES AND STEPS TO BE TAKEN ..................... 149 - 151 25 VI. ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY .............................. 152 - 179 27 A. Presence of United Nations bodies in Burundi ..... 152 - 154 27 B. The Special Representative of the Secretary- General for Burundi .............................. 155 - 163 28 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Sanctions Against Burundi: a Powerful Campaign and Its Unintended Consequences
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Grauvogel, Julia Working Paper Regional Sanctions against Burundi: A Powerful Campaign and Its Unintended Consequences GIGA Working Papers, No. 255 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Grauvogel, Julia (2014) : Regional Sanctions against Burundi: A Powerful Campaign and Its Unintended Consequences, GIGA Working Papers, No. 255, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/103655 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should limit in any other venue.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Human Rights Report: Burundi Page 1 of 13
    1996 Human Rights Report: Burundi Page 1 of 13 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Burundi Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1996 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, January 30, 1997. BURUNDI Burundi's democratically elected president was overthrown in a military coup on July 25. Despite the coup, the National Assembly and political parties continue to operate, although under constraints. The present regime, under the self-proclaimed interim President, Major Pierre Buyoya, abrogated the 1992 Constitution and, during the so-called Transition Period, replaced the 1994 Convention of Government with a decree promulgated on September 13. Under this decree, the National Assembly does not have the power to remove the President of the Republic. The Prime Minister, appointed by the President, replaces the President in the event of the President's death or incapacity. Under the former constitution, the President of the National Assembly replaced the President. Buyoya holds power in conjunction with the Tutsi-dominated military establishment. The judicial system remains under the control of the Tutsi minority, and most citizens consider it biased against Hutus. Violent conflict among Hutu and Tutsi armed militants and the army plunged the country into a civil war marked by ethnic violence, which included fighting between the army and armed rebel groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Persistence of State Fragility in Burundi
    APRIL 2018 The origin and persistence of state fragility in Burundi Janvier D. Nkurunziza Abstract State fragility in Burundi has been a cause, and consequence, of the country’s political instability. Since independence, Burundi has endured six episodes of civil war, two major foiled coup d’états, and five coup d’états that have led to regime change. The root cause of state fragility is traced back to divisive practices introduced by the colonial power, which have since been perpetuated by post-colonial elites. This political volatility has generated persistent cycles of violence, resulting in the collapse of the country’s institutions and economy, even after the negotiation of the Arusha Agreement. This has led to mass migration of Burundi’s people and the emergence of a large refugee population, dispersed among neighbouring states and far away. Therefore, state fragility in Burundi is first and foremost the result of the strategies and policies of its political leaders, who are motivated by personal interests. Political capture calls into question the legitimacy of those in power, who feed state fragility through rent extraction, corruption, and mismanagement. This has had vast economic consequences, including slow growth, an underdeveloped private sector, an unstable investment landscape, and severe financial constraints. For reconciliation to be achieved, justice needs to be afforded to those who have encountered repression from the state, thereby breaking the cycle of violence. What’s more, Burundi needs strong and long-term engagement of the international community for the successful implementation of reforms, as well as the provision of technical and financial resources, to embark on a prosperous and peaceful path.
    [Show full text]
  • International Commission of Inquiry for Burundi: Final Report]1 2
    [International Commission of Inquiry for Burundi: Final Report]1 2 Contents Part I: Introduction I. Creation of the Commission II. The Commission’s Mandate III. General Methodology IV. Activities of the Commissions A. 1995 B. 1996 V. Difficulties in the Commission’s Work A. The time elapsed since the events under investigation B. Ethnic polarization in Burundi C. The security situation in Burundi D. Inadequacy of resources VI. Acknowledgements VII. Documents and Recordings Part II: Background I. Geographical Summary of Burundi II. Population III. Administrative Organization IV. Economic Summary V. Historical Summary VI. The Presidency of Melchior Ndadaye VII. Events After the Assassination Part III: Investigation of the Assassination I. Object of the Inquiry II. Methodology III. Access to Evidence IV. Work of the Commission V. The Facts According to Witnesses A. 3 July 1993 B. 10 July 1993 C. 11 October 1993 1 Note: This title is derived from information found at Part I:1:2 of the report. No title actually appears at the top of the report. 2 Posted by USIP Library on: January 13, 2004 Source Name: United Nations Security Council, S/1996/682; received from Ambassador Thomas Ndikumana, Burundi Ambassador to the United States Date received: June 7, 2002 D. Monday, 18 October 1993 E. Tuesday, 19 October 1993 F. Wednesday, 20 October 1993 G. Thursday, 21 October 1993, Midnight to 2 a.m. H. Thursday, 21 October 1993, 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. I. Thursday, 21 October 1993, 6 a.m. to noon J. Thursday, 21 October 1993, Afternoon VI. Analysis of Testimony VII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cause of Conflict in Burundi
    Högskolan Dalarna Juvenal Hatungimana International Relations II Research Paper, 7,5 Credits SK 1041 Spring 2011 THE CAUSE OF CONFLICT IN BURUNDI Head teacher: Thomas Sedelius Abstract In my research paper, I will focus on the security situation in the Republic of Burundi, a small country located in the African Great Lakes, which knows a long period of political instability and armed conflict since its independence untill now. The aim is to make the necessarly investigations in order to discover the cause of the conflict in Burundi and to see how the political realist theory of self- interests and materialist values in politics applie to this situation. I will use Mill’s method of difference to test how it can help to find maybe, an answer to my research question. 2 Table of content Front page……………………………………………………………………………………1 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………….2 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Method………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Geographical location…………………………………………………………………. 4 Historical context………………………………………………………………..……… 4 History of conflict in Burundi………………………………………………….……5 Different civil wars…………………………………………………………….………..6 Arusha peace negotiations…………………………………………….……….…….8 Defining ethnic groups…………………………………………………………………9 Political realism approach…………………………………………………………..11 The vicious circle………………………………………………………………….…….12 The true cause of conflict in Burundi…………………………………………...13 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………16 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………… .17 3 Introduction The objective of
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi: the Issues at Stake. Political Parties, Freedom of the Press and Political Prisoners
    BURUNDI: THE ISSUES AT STAKE. POLITICAL PARTIES, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND POLITICAL PRISONERS 12 July 2000 ICG Africa Report N° 23 Nairobi/Brussels (Original Version in French) Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................i INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1 I. POLITICAL PARTIES: PURGES, SPLITS AND CRACKDOWNS.........................1 A. Beneficiaries of democratisation turned participants in the civil war (1992-1996)3 1. Opposition groups with unclear identities ................................................. 4 2. Resorting to violence to gain or regain power........................................... 7 B. Since the putsch: dangerous games of the government................................... 9 1. Purge of opponents to the peace process (1996-1998)............................ 10 2. Harassment of militant activities ............................................................ 14 C. Institutionalisation of political opportunism................................................... 17 1. Partisan putsches and alliances of convenience....................................... 18 2. Absence of fresh political attitudes......................................................... 20 D. Conclusion ................................................................................................. 23 II WHICH FREEDOM FOR WHAT MEDIA ?...................................................... 25 A. Media
    [Show full text]