DOCSLIB.ORG

(NE-CHPS) VERSION 3.1 Updated August 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(NE-CHPS) VERSION 3.1 Updated August 2014 NORTHEAST COLLABORATIVE FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS CRITERIA (NE-CHPS) VERSION 3.1 Updated August 2014 About NEEP: NEEP transforms the way we use and think about energy. We are a non-profit organization that builds partnerships among the efficiency industry, communities, businesses and policymakers in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states. Through advocacy, collaboration, and education, we accelerate energy efficiency and make visible its impacts on the region, the economy, the planet, and future generations. About NE-CHPS The Northeast Collaborative for High Performance Schools Criteria (NE-CHPS) was developed to promote operational energy savings and sustainable design features in school construction and major renovations throughout the region. NEEP’s vision is that the work done today on High Performance Schools will pave the way for the development of zero net energy schools, schools that consume no more energy than they produce, on a broader scale throughout the region. NE-CHPS is based on the pioneering Collaborative for High Performance Schools’ Guidelines, but has been tailored by NEEP to the climate, building codes, and educational priorities of the Northeastern United States. About CHPS The Collaborative for High Performance Schools believes kids learn better in schools with good lighting, clean air, and comfortable classrooms. That’s why CHPS works with schools and experts to make changes to ensure that every child has the best possible learning environment with the smallest impact on the planet. CHPS helps facilitate and inspire change in our educational system. The goals of CHPS are to fundamentally change the design, construction and operation of schools to: . Protect student and staff health, and enhance the learning environments of school children everywhere . Conserve energy, water, and other natural resources . Reduce waste, pollution, and environmental degradation Cover Photo Credit: Abbot-Downing School (Concord, New Hampshire) photo provided by Ed Wonsek Art Works and HMFH Architects. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS After an extended stakeholder engagement and public comment period, Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP) has revised the NE-CHPS Criteria for high performance schools. This effort is intended to help accelerate the development of high performance and zero net energy (ZNE) schools in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states. NE-CHPS 3.1’s development was led by members of NEEP’s High Performance Buildings team, Carolyn Sarno and Brian Buckley, as well as CHPS’ Technical Associate Nick Semon. NEEP would like to recognize and thank the High Performance Schools Regional Leadership group for its invaluable contributions and participation in the development of this roadmap. Carlos Desousa Garcia Galuska Desousa Engineers Carolyn Day DBA-W Architects Cathy Hilgendorf Vermont Department of Education Chris Armstrong Stephen Turner Inc. Cynthia Veit U.S. EPA Region One Ingrid Moulton Banwell Architects Jeff Forward Forward Thinking Consultants Jessica Hing U.S. EPA Region One Joseph Da Silva Rhode Island Department of Education Karen Verrengia Cranston, Rhode Island Public Schools Kathy Arthur NSTAR Ken Wertz Sharon, Massachusetts Public Schools Linda Darveau U.S. EPA Region One Lisa Capone Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources Manuel Cordero Rhode Island Department of Education Mario Carreno Rhode Island Department of Education Marjorie Schoonmaker New Hampshire Department of Education Mark Stafford National Grid Mark Wills ASHRAE (formerly) Martine Dion SMMA Architects Michele M. Fiano NYSERDA Norman Etkind Vermont Superintendents Association Patrick Coleman Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources Paul Anastasi Newton, Massachusetts Public Schools Paul Leveille The Jordan Institute Puja Vohra National Grid Richard Donnelly Vermont Energy Investment Corporation Robert Cerio Ocean State Energy Resources Timothy Duffy Rhode Island Association of School Committees Tom Coughlin National Grid Walter Hoefer Long Island Power Authority (formerly) Wilbur Yoder Rhode Island School of Design The Following NEEP staff served as reviewers and provided feedback, input, and edits: Carolyn Sarno, Jim O’Reilly, Kevin Rose, Brian Buckley, Claire Miziolek, and David Lis. NEEP would also like to recognize Energy & Resource Solutions (ERS) for their development of NE-CHPS Version 1.0 – 2.0. iii Collaborative for High Performance Schools This content is adapted from the CHPS National Core Criteria by permission of The Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS). The Collaborative for High Performance Schools®, CHPS®, the CHPS logo, and the Green Apple Awards® are registered trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The CHPS CriteriaTM, CHPS National Core CriteriaTM, CHPS VerifiedTM, CHPS Verified LeaderTM, CHPS DesignedTM , CHPS PreFABTM, Operations Report CardTM, ORCTM copyrighted by CHPS, Inc. In addition, enhancements and additions to this and previous NE-CHPS Criteria versions are copyrighted by the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP). End users of the NE-CHPS Criteria are permitted to use and/or copy the content without further Consent. However, CHPS, Inc. prior permission must be granted in order to relicense, publish or develop derivative works from CHPS copyrighted materials. The CHPS Core Criteria Version 1.0 was originally developed by an ad-hoc committee of CHPS stakeholders in 2009 as both a framework and process to establish a national definition for healthy, high performance schools while encouraging local flexibility. In addition, the Core Criteria represents a facilitated process to reduce the development time and expense of state and regional adaptations of the CHPS Criteria. Over the intervening four years CHPS has successfully piloted the use of the Core Criteria in three states – Massachusetts (an update of the first edition of MA-CHPS), Virginia, and Hawaii. Using the Core Criteria as a common starting point cut the development time in half. Version 2.0 of the National Core Criteria incorporates lessons learned from these pilots and other previous CHPS Criteria adaptations. The CHPS National Core Criteria Version 2.0 was developed by the CHPS National Technical Committee under the leadership of: Committee Co-chairs: John Zinner and Jim Ogden Integration & Steering subcommittee chair: Christopher Gerber Indoor Environmental Quality subcommittee co-chairs: Toni Stein and Leo Cedolin Energy subcommittee chair: Charles Eley, vice-chair Maureen Guttman Water & Site subcommittee chair: Chris Duncan Materials & Waste Management subcommittee chair: Melanie Jacobson Operations & Metrics subcommittee chair: Rob Samish Facilitators: Kristin Parineh, Julie Duncan, Nick Semon, and Ed Wansing Notice and Editing: Ariel Dekovic Technical Editor: Bill Orr CHPS thanks all of the members of the National Technical Committee for their time and contributions during the Core Criteria update process. See the complete membership of the CHPS National Technical Committee at: http://www.chps.net/national-technical-committee. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard to the subject matters covered. However, although great care has been taken in the compilation and publication of this manual, it is published with the understanding that (1) the publisher and authors make no guarantee that the manual meets all federal, state, and local statutory, regulatory, or other requirements, and (2) the publisher and authors are not engaged in rendering professional advice via this manual or their work and/or affiliation with CHPS, Inc. The publisher and authors cannot be responsible for errors or omissions, or any agency’s interpretations, applications, and changes of regulations or specifications described in this publication. Use of any provision contained herein is the sole responsibility of the specifier. iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Table II: Renovation Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 6 INTEGRATION ........................................................................................................................ 8 II 1.0 – Integrated Design ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 II 1.1 – Enhanced Integrated Design ................................................................................................................................... 9 II 2.1 – District Level Commitment .................................................................................................................................. 13 II 3.1 – School Master Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 16 II.4.1 – High Performance Transition Plan.................................................................................................................... 18 II 5.0 – Educational Display ................................................................................................................................................ 21 II 5.1 – Demonstration Area ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Thermal Simulation Tool for Building and Its Interoperability Through the Building Information Modeling (BIM) Platform
    Buildings 2013, 3, 380-398; doi:10.3390/buildings3020380 OPEN ACCESS buildings ISSN 2075-5309 www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings/ Article A Thermal Simulation Tool for Building and Its Interoperability through the Building Information Modeling (BIM) Platform Yudi Nugraha Bahar 1,*, Christian Pere 2, Jérémie Landrieu 2 and Christophe Nicolle 3 1 University of Bourgogne-France, Arts et Metiers ParisTech, LE2I, UMR CNRS 6306, Institut Image, Chalon-sur-Saône, France 2 Arts et Metiers ParisTech, CNRS, LE2I, Institut Image, 2 Rue T. Dumorey 71100 Chalon-sur-Saône, France; E-Mails: [email protected] (C.P.); [email protected] (J.L.) 3 IUT Dijon-Auxerre, University of Bourgogne, Laboratoire LE2I, UMR CNRS 6306, France; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected]; or [email protected]; Tel.: +33-602-309-823. Received: 1 March 2013; in revised form: 25 April 2013 / Accepted: 14 May 2013 / Published: 22 May 2013 Abstract: This paper describes potential challenges and opportunities for using thermal simulation tools to optimize building performance. After reviewing current trends in thermal simulation, it outlines major criteria for the evaluation of building thermal simulation tools based on specifications and capabilities in interoperability. Details are discussed including workflow of data exchange of multiple thermal analyses such as the BIM-based application. The present analysis focuses on selected thermal simulation tools that provide functionalities to exchange data with other tools in order to obtain a picture of its basic work principles and to identify selection criteria for generic thermal tools in BIM.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Building' Architects and Use of Open-Source Tools Towards Achievement of Millennium Development Goals
    'Building' Architects and Use of Open-source Tools Towards Achievement of Millennium Development Goals. Oku, Onyeibo Chidozie Department of Architecture Faculty of Environmental Sciences Enugu State University of Science and Technology Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were established by the United Nations to improve the well-being of humans and their habitat. Whether they are the target beneficiaries or amongst the parties administering services for achieving the MDGs, humans must carry out these activities in a physical environment. Hence, the Seventh Goal of the MDG has an indirect and far-reaching relationship with the others because it deals with the sustainable development of the built environment. Architects deliver consultancy services that span the design, documentation and construction supervision of the built environment. This study sought to determine the extent to which these professionals can do this, with respect to the Seventh Millennium Development Goal, using mainly open-source tools. The study draws from literature reviews, end-user feedback or reports, interviews with developers of applicable open-source products, and statistics from a survey, launched in 2011, for capturing how architects use ICT in their businesses. Analysis of popular open-source technologies for the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry show a concentration of resources in favour of the later stages of the Architect's role, rather than the design and contract-drawing stages. Some of the better-implemented tools are either too cryptic for professionals who communicate in graphical terms, or heavily biased towards software engineering practices. The products that promise Building Information Modelling (BIM) capabilities are still at an early developmental stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Capabilities of Bim to Support Performance Based Design
    www.itcon.org - Journal of Information Technology in Construction - ISSN 1874-4753 EXTENDING CAPABILITIES OF BIM TO SUPPORT PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN SUBMITTED: January 2017 REVISED: October 2017 PUBLISHED: February 2018 at https://www.itcon.org/2018/2 EDITOR: Amor R. Nusrat Jung, M.Sc.,* VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, [email protected]; [email protected] Tarja Häkkinen, PhD., VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland [email protected] Mirkka Rekola, M.Sc., Senate Properties [email protected] SUMMARY: As we advance towards high-performance buildings, it is becoming necessary to reinforce and extend the role of building information modelling (BIM) to better support performance-based design. To achieve an optimally functioning building that fulfils the need of the end-user and is designed in an environmentally conscious manner necessitates considering energy performance, environmental performance, indoor air quality, lighting, and acoustics. To consider these multiple criteria, use of computer-based modelling tools and comprehensive simulation methods becomes essential. These criteria are typically assessed after the main phases of architectural design of the building, and the knowledge is passed on to the engineers for development of the technical design. During the technical design process, the exchange of data between the design model and a selected building performance aspect may occur. This paper investigates the potential of BIM-based models at the core of providing input data required for performance-based simulations (BPS) to enable iterative multi-criteria assessment towards high performance buildings. A comprehensive literature review of 249 documents was conducted to identify the current state of knowledge and provide future directions for design and simulation tools to better quantify and evaluate the performance aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Energy Model Generation Using a Digital
    BUILDING ENERGY MODEL GENERATION USING A DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY-BASED 3D MODEL A Thesis by MOHAMMAD S A A M ALAWADHI Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Wei Yan Committee Members, Jeff Haberl Julian Kang Head of Department, Robert Warden May 2017 Major Subject: Architecture Copyright 2017 Mohammad S A A M Alawadhi ABSTRACT Buildings consume a large amount of energy and environmental resources. At the same time, current practices for whole-building energy simulation are costly and require skilled labor. As Building Energy Modeling (BEM) and simulations are becoming increasingly important, there is a growing need to make environmental assessments of buildings more efficient and accessible. A building energy model is based on collecting input data from the real, physical world and representing them as a digital energy model. Real-world data is also collected in the field of 3D reconstruction and image analysis, where major developments have been happening in recent years. Current digital photogrammetry software can automatically match photographs taken with a simple smartphone camera and generate a 3D model. This thesis presents methods and techniques that can be used to generate a building energy model from a digital photogrammetry-based 3D model. To accomplish this, a prototype program was developed that uses 3D reconstructed data as geometric modeling inputs for BEM. To validate the prototype, an experiment was conducted where a case-study building was selected. Photographs of the building were taken using a small remotely- controlled Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) drone.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations in Building Energy Modeling
    Innovations in Building Energy Modeling Research and Development Opportunities Report for Emerging Technologies November 2020 Innovations in Building Energy Modeling: Research and Development Opportunities Report Disclaimer This work was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, its contractors or subcontractors. ii Innovations in Building Energy Modeling: Research and Development Opportunities Report Acknowledgments Prepared by Amir Roth, Ph.D. Special thanks to the following individuals and groups. Robert Zogg and Emily Cross of Guidehouse (then Navigant Consulting) conducted the interviews, organized the stakeholder workshops, and wrote the first DRAFT BEM Roadmap. Janet Reyna of NREL (then an ORISE Fellow at BTO) provided extensive feedback on the initial DRAFT BEM Roadmap and helped create the organization for the subsequent DRAFT BEM Research and Development Opportunities (RDO) document.
    [Show full text]
  • BIM Software List.Xlsx
    7D Maintenance & MANIFACTURES 3D Modeling 4D Scheduling 5D Costi 6D Sustainability Operation Architecture Structure MEP Viewer Rendering Management AUTODESK Revit Naviswork Manage Naviswork Manage Vasari Builng OPS Revit Revit Revit A360 3D Studio BIM 360 DOC AUTODESK Infrawork 360 Green Building Studio Robot Structural Analysis BIM 360 Field AUTODESK AutoCAD Civil 3D Ecotect Analysis Advanced Concrete AUTODESK AutoCAD Architecture Advanced Steel BENTLEY SYSTEMS AECOsim Building Designer Navigator ConstructSim Hevacomp AssetWise RAM Hevacomp Bentley View Luxology ProjectWise BENTLEY SYSTEMS MicroStation AECOsim Energy Simulator Bentley Facilities STAAD Navigator BENTLEY SYSTEMS OpenRoads BENTLEY SYSTEMS ProStructures BENTLEY SYSTEMS Generative Components ProSteel Hevacomp NEMETSCHEK Allplan Nevaris EcoDesigner STAR Crem Solution Scia Data Design System Solibri Model Cheker Maxon NEMETSCHEK Graphisoft ArchiCAD ArchiFM PreCast MEP Modeler Solibri Model Viewer NEMETSCHEK Vectorworks Frilo Software BIMx TRIMBLE SketchUp Pro Vico Office Vico Office Sefaira Tekla BIM Sight Tekla Structures DuctDesigner 3D Tekla BIM Sight Project Management TRIMBLE PipeDesigner 3D SketUp Viewer Trimble Connect DASSAULT SYSTÈMES Solidworks Solidworks Enovia DASSAULT SYSTÈMES Catia Midas Information Technology Midas Design Midas Gen CSI SAFE CSI SAP2000 CSI ETABS ARKTEC Gest Mideplan Gest Mideplan Tricalc DIAL DIALux DesignBuilder Design Builder IES VE‐Pro RIB SOFTWARE iTWO iTWO iTWO RIB SOFTWARE Presto Cost‐it Beck Technology DESTIN IEstimator Micad Global Group
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND Bachelor of Engineering Thesis
    THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND Bachelor of Engineering Thesis Industry Workflow for Converting Building Information Modelling to Building Energy Modelling Student Name: Gareth Clark Course Code: MECH4500 Supervisor: Associate Professor Saiied Aminossadati Submission date: 25 October 2018 UQ Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology [This page has been deliberately left blank] Executive Summary The building services industry is currently undergoing change as a rapid increase in sustainability awareness is being focused on around the world, bringing about a focus on energy modelling to analyze and predict building performance. To perform energy analyses, models are re-created due to software limitations where an already existing Revit model already exists. The aim of this thesis was to develop an effective technique for complex building energy modelling by converting a Building Information Model (BIM) into a Building Energy Model (BEM). This is done to create a workflow document for the conversion process. A secondary objective was a comparison between Revit’s building information-energy modelling (BI-EM), OpenStudio’s building energy modelling (BEM) and the converted BIM to BEM modelling (BIM-BEM) to validate the BI-EM and BIM-BEM models against the trusted BEM modelling. The project was completed through several primary steps in order to reach each objective. This approach was to first test processes for converting from Revit to OpenStudio, then create a Revit BIM model, prepare the Revit BIM model for conversion, convert the prepared Revit model to OpenStudio and run the simulation. This provided the necessary information to create a workflow document. The last step was to compare BI-EM, BEM and BIM-BEM as energy simulation methods.
    [Show full text]
  • BIM-Its-Implementation-Strategies
    Advancing the Role of Geospatial THEME Knowledge in Indian Economy 24-26 August 2021 HICC Hyderabad, India CLICK TO KNOW MORE BIM & its implementation strategies Dr. Amarnath CB President, India BIM Association. Head - BIM Strategy, Larsen & Toubro Construction. +91 9686623376 [email protected] [email protected] Building Information Modeling BIM is a set of technologies, processes and policies enabling multiple stakeholders to collaboratively design, construct and operate a Facility in virtual space (BIM Dictionary, 2018). AECO organizations and their stakeholders AECO Organizational & project teams Source: Succar et al., 2013 Aligning AECO organizational teams of a project towards the BIM project’s strategy Source: Parmenter 2015 Project strategy and performance objectives Source: Kerzner 2013 Global Trends in BIM Research Amarnath CB (2016). Global trends in BIM research. BIM ThinkSpace blog post. 28th September 2016. URL: http://www.bimthinkspace.com/2016/09/global-trends-in-bim-research.html Distribution of BIM publications according to Research Directions Amarnath CB (2016). Global trends in BIM research. BIM ThinkSpace blog post. 28th September 2016. URL: http://www.bimthinkspace.com/2016/09/global-trends-in-bim-research.html BIM Adoption Efforts Worldwide from Public Sector Amarnath CB (2017). “BIM Implementation in India.” India BIM Association blog post. 10th Sep 2017. URL: http://ibima.co.in/2017/09/10/bim-implementation-india/ BIM Standards & Guidelines • United States: NIST, NIBS, MPA, CIC, CRC, NYSCA, GSFIC, MIT, PSU, VCU,
    [Show full text]
  • DELIVERABLE D3.4 Analysis of Regulations & Markets for BIM
    Ref. Ares(2019)5004115 - 31/07/2019 Project Acronym: BIMERR Project Full Title: BIM‐based holistic tools for Energy‐driven Renovation of existing Residences Grant Agreement: 820621 Project Duration: 42 months DELIVERABLE D3.4 Analysis of Regulations & Markets for BIM‐based Renovation‐support Tools Deliverable Status: Final File Name: Analysis of Regulations & Markets for BIM‐based Renovation‐support Tools Due Date: 31/07/2019 (719) Submission Date: 30/07/2019 (719) Task Leader: Exergy Ltd (T3.4) Dissemination level Public Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission Services) x The BIMERR project consortium is composed of: Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten FIT Germany Forschung E.V. CERTH Ethniko Kentro Erevnas Kai Technologikis Anaptyxis Greece UPM Universidad Politecnica De Madrid Spain UBITECH Ubitech Limited Cyprus SUITE5 Suite5 Data Intelligence Solutions Limited Cyprus Hypertech (Chaipertek) Anonymos Viomichaniki Emporiki Etaireia HYPERTECH Greece Pliroforikis Kai Neon Technologion MERIT Merit Consulting House Sprl Belgium XYLEM Xylem Science And Technology Management Gmbh Austria GU Glassup Srl Italy Anonymos Etaireia Kataskevon Technikon Ergon, Emporikon CONKAT Greece Viomichanikonkai Nautiliakon Epicheiriseon Kon'kat BOC Boc Asset Management Gmbh Austria BX Budimex Sa Poland UOP University Of Peloponnese Greece EXE Exergy Ltd United Kingdom HWU Heriot‐Watt University United Kingdom NT Novitech As Slovakia FER Ferrovial Agroman S.A Spain Disclaimer BIMERR project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement n°820621. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Commission (EC).
    [Show full text]
  • Energyplus: DOE’S Next Generation Simulation Program
    EnergyPlus: DOE’s Next Generation Simulation Program Building Technologies Program Drury B. Crawley, Ph.D. February 16, 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program Name or Ancillary Text eere.energy.gov Buildings’ Energy Use EnergyPlus eere.energy.gov Commercial Buildings’ Energy Share Commercial buildings account for: • 18% of U.S. energy • 18% of greenhouse gas emissions (~1,000 MMT of CO2e) • slightly less than India’s entire energy consumption and GHG emissions EnergyPlus eere.energy.gov Commercial Square Footage Projections Plus ~38B ft.2 104 new additions 82 Minus ~16B ft.2 demolitions 72 66 2003 2010 2030 Source: EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2009, Table 5. EnergyPlus eere.energy.gov Projected Electricity Growth 2010 to 2030, by End-Use Sector (site quad) EnergyPlus eere.energy.gov Projected Increase in Carbon Dioxide Emissions 2008 to 2030, by End-Use Sector (MMTCO2-e) EnergyPlus eere.energy.gov Goals for Commercial Buildings EnergyPlus eere.energy.gov EnergyPlus • Fully integrated building, envelope, HVAC, water, and renewables simulation program • Available free at www.energyplus.gov • Originally based on BLAST and DOE-2.1E, far exceeds their capabilities now EnergyPlus eere.energy.gov EnergyPlus (cont.) • One of the most robust simulation tools available in the world today • Enables integrated energy performance analysis of low-energy technologies in commercial and residential buildings including on-site generation and renewable energy sources • Interfaces available from private sector developers
    [Show full text]
  • Yunjie Xiong Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Partial Fulfill
    A BIM-based Interoperability Platform in Support of Building Operation and Energy Management Yunjie Xiong Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Environmental Design and Planning Georg Reichard, Chair Tanyel Bulbul Farrokh Karimi Nazila Roofigari-Esfahan Feb 21, 2020 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: Building Information Modelling (BIM), energy simulation, operational data Copyright © 2020 Yunjie Xiong A BIM-based Interoperability Platform in Support of Building Operation and Energy Management Yunjie Xiong ACADEMIC ABSTRACT Building energy efficiency is progressively becoming a crucial topic in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) sector. Energy management tools have been developed to promise appropriate energy savings. Building energy simulation (BES) is a tool mainly used to analyze and compare the energy consumption of various design/operation scenarios, while building automation systems (BAS) works as another energy management tool to monitor, measure and collect operational data, all in an effort to optimize energy consumption. By integrating the energy simulated data and actual operational data, the accuracy of a building energy model can be increased while the calibrated energy model can be applied as a benchmark for guiding the operational strategies. This research predicted that building information modeling (BIM) would link BES and BAS by acting as a visual model and a database throughout the lifecycle of a building. The intent of the research was to use BIM to document energy-related information and to allow its exchange between BES and BAS. Thus, the energy-related data exchange process would be simplified, and the productive efficiency of facility management processes would increase.
    [Show full text]
  • BIM Handbook: a Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors
    www.EngineeringBooksPdf.com www.EngineeringBooksPdf.com BIM Handbook A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors Second Edition Chuck Eastman Paul Teicholz Rafael Sacks Kathleen Liston John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ffirs.indd i 3/8/11 10:53:45 PM www.EngineeringBooksPdf.com This book is printed on acid-free paper. ϱ Copyright © 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and the author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifi cally disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fi tness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]