Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous 845 Positive Airway Pressure: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous 845 Positive Airway Pressure: a Randomized Controlled Trial 1 2 Nasal Intermittent 3 4 Mandatory Ventilation 5 6 Versus Nasal Continuous Positive 7 Airway Pressure Before and After 8 9 Invasive Ventilatory Support 10 11 a, a 12 Osayame Ekhaguere, MBBS, MPH *, Shama Patel, MD , b 13 Haresh Kirpalani, BM, MSc Q2 Q3 14 15 16 KEYWORDS 17 Noninvasive respiratory support Continuous positive airway pressure 18 Noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation Respiratory failure 19 Premature infants Intubation Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula 20 21 22 KEY POINTS 23 Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), noninvasive intermittent positive pressure 24 ventilation (NIPPV), and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) are the main- 25 stays of primary and postextubation respiratory support in preterm infants. 26 The physiologic basis and practical application of CPAP and HHFNC are well delineated, 27 whereas those of NIPPV remain unsubstantiated and varied in the literature. 28 Available evidence suggests that NIPPV is superior to CPAP for primary and postextuba- 29 tion respiratory support in preterm infants. 30 Guidelines are needed on the practical application of NIPPV for preterm infants. 31 32 33 34 35 INTRODUCTION Q8 36 In current neonatal practice, a consensus now exists that avoidance or limitation of 37 invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants when possible is of benefit.1 38 Clinical trials on noninvasive respiratory support for newborns began in the late 39 1960s.2,3 However, inadequate devices and interfaces and, serious complications 40 41 42 43 Disclosures: None. Q6 Q7 44 a Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Indiana University, Riley 45 Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, 1030 West Michigan Street, C4600, Indian- b 46 apolis, IN 46202, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, The Children’s Q4 47 Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA * Corresponding author. Q5 48 E-mail address: [email protected] Clin Perinatol - (2019) -–- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2019.05.004 perinatology.theclinics.com 0095-5108/19/ª 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. CLP1104_proof ■ 20 June 2019 ■ 12:31 pm 2 Ekhaguere et al 49 limited their adoption.4,5 Because invasive mechanical ventilation significantly 50 reduced neonatal mortality, focus on noninvasive support was limited. However, the Q9 51 association of invasive mechanical ventilation with bronchopulmonary dysplasia 52 (BPD),6 poor neurodevelopment,7 later mortality, and impacts on health care costs8 53 became more widely appreciated and stimulated further work to improve devices 54 and interfaces. Investigations into noninvasive respiratory support expanded in the 55 late 1980s after early observations raised hope of decreasing the incidence of 56 BPD.9 More systematic work then began on whether it would (1) obviate mechanical 57 ventilation, (2) prevent extubation failure, and (3) reduce the incidence of BPD. There 58 has been a significant increase in the use of noninvasive respiratory support in the last 59 2 decades.10 However, there is emerging evidence that the incidence of BPD has 60 remained unchanged in the same time period.10 Noninvasive respiratory support is 61 now available as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), nasal intermittent pos- 62 itive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula 63 (HHFNC). 64 This article focuses on 2 of the most extensively studied modes of noninvasive 65 respiratory support: CPAP and NIPPV. It reviews their mechanisms of action and 66 physiologic effects, and summarizes the evidence comparing their clinical use. Evi- 67 dence is drawn primarily from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In brief, it also dis- 68 cusses HHFNC and a newer form of noninvasive support: noninvasive high-frequency 69 ventilation. 70 71 CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE 72 Brief History 73 The physiologic consequences of laryngeal braking (grunting) sparked interest in 74 2,11 75 CPAP respiratory support. Teleologically, the goal seemed to be to overcome atel- 76 ectasis in spontaneously breathing newborns. Could this be used therapeutically? In the earliest publication of its use, there was an astonishing 55% increase in the ex- 77 2 78 pected survival. 79 Physiologic Principles of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure 80 81 Continuous positive airway pressure generates distending pressure that maintains 12 82 functional residual capacity. CPAP reduces elastic, flow-resistive, and inertial resis- 83 tance properties of the respiratory system and stabilizes the compliant premature 13–15 84 chest wall. Ultimately this reduces ventilation-perfusion mismatch and improves 16,17 85 oxygenation, work of breathing, and thoracoabdominal synchrony. Because atel- 86 ectasis leads to inflammation, unsurprisingly, CPAP reduces the inflammatory 18 87 response in the lower respiratory tract. In lamb studies, CPAP compared with me- 88 chanical ventilation reduced alveolar neutrophil influx, hydrogen peroxide production, 18,19 89 and protein accumulation, the hallmarks of lung injury that predispose preterm in- 19 90 fants to BPD. 91 Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Generating Devices 92 93 CPAP generating devices can be broadly classified into variable or continuous-flow 94 systems. 95 Variable-flow continuous positive airway pressure 96 These devices vary CPAP levels predominantly by varying gas flow rate. They entrain 97 gas flow and generate pressure during inspiration by the Bernoulli effect with the pres- 98 20 ence of an adaptive flip valve at the nasal interface (Fig. 1). The Infant Flow LP CPAP Q10 99 system (Care Fusion, Yorba Linda, CA) is an example of a variable-flow CPAP device. CLP1104_proof ■ 20 June 2019 ■ 12:31 pm Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation vs CPAP Q1 3 100 101 FPO 102 = 103 104 105 106 print & web 4C 107 Fig. 1. Design of nosepiece the medijet ª variable flow NCPAP. I. Diagram of the main com- 108 ponents: A, Breathing gas inlet with nozzle; B, Open gap of the Benvenisteprinciple; C, 109 Opening to the pressure chamber; D-Pressure/volume chamber; E-Expiration open; F, patient 110 interface. II. Breathing gas flows via the Benvenistevalve into the pressure chamber of the 111 Medijet. During inspiration, pressure in the patient’s airway decreases and breathing gas 112 flows in the direction of low resistance. III. During expiration, the expiratory flow (blue) 113 from the patient meets the incoming fresh gas flow (red) and is redirected out. (Courtesy 114 of medinMedical Innovations GmbH Olching, Germany) 115 Continuous-flow continuous positive airway pressure 116 These devices generate pressure by preventing gas egress from the circuit, which is 117 accomplished by an expiratory limb resistance or a titratable positive end-expiratory 118 pressure (PEEP) valve, depending on the specific device.20 Ventilator-derived 119 CPAP, and bubble CPAP (bCPAP) are both continuous-flow CPAP devices. The sub- 120 merged expiratory limb of the bCPAP system generates its pressure. Varying the sub- 121 mersion depth changes the pressure (Fig. 2). Some observational studies suggest that 122 bubbling from bCPAP further improves gas exchange by delivering low-amplitude, 123 high-frequency oscillations to the lungs, 21,22 but this is unsubstantiated in observa- 124 tional studies.23 125 126 Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Delivery Interfaces 127 Earlier CPAP systems used head and face chambers or endotracheal tubes to trans- 128 24 129 mit CPAP. In current practice, soft and less irritant binasal prongs and nasal masks 130 often made of silicone-based material are used. There is evidence of superiority of short binasal compared with single nasal and nasopharyngeal prongs in preventing 131 25 132 reintubation and improving oxygenation. Long nasopharyngeal tubes, which sit 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 FPO 144 = 145 146 147 148 149 print & web 4C Fig. 2. Bubble CPAP setup showing blended air source, heater humidification system, under- 150 water seal, and CPAP interface. (Courtesy of GaleMedCorporation, I-Lan, Taiwan) CLP1104_proof ■ 20 June 2019 ■ 12:31 pm 4 Ekhaguere et al 151 over the pharynx, are also used but are prone to obstruction. Binasal prongs and 152 masks may also result in complications. The major reported complication is nasal 153 septal injury, some requiring surgical intervention.26,27 However, dedicated nursing 154 care and barrier dressings (hydrocolloid and silicone gel sheeting) have been shown 155 to reduce significantly the risk of nasal injury.26,28–30 156 157 Comparative Studies 158 Continuous positive airway pressure versus supportive care for initial respiratory 159 support for preterm infants 160 Most trials in this category were in an era when antenatal steroids and surfactant were 161 still emerging therapies, which makes extrapolating their results to medically 162 advanced neonatal practice difficult. However, they still provide insight for low- 163 resource settings. 164 Two Cochrane meta-analyses examined CPAP versus supportive care for primary 165 respiratory support.31,32 Supportive care included head-box oxygen or regular nasal 166 cannula with thermoregulation and intravenous fluids. The first meta-analysis included 167 premature infants treated within the first 15 minutes of life, regardless of the respira- 168 tory status of the infant.31 Four trials that recruited 765 subjects were included. Failure 169 was determined as need for mechanical ventilation in 3 trials and need for CPAP in 1 170 trial. Individually, the older trials did not show any difference. However, in newer trials 171 dating from 2012, CPAP significantly decreased the failure rates. In the meta-analysis, 172 CPAP was superior to supportive care in reducing treatment failure (typical risk ratio 173 [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.98; typical risk difference [RD] 174 À0.16, 95% CI À0.34 to –0.02).31 There was no reduction in BPD or mortality.31 175 The second meta-analysis evaluated continuous distending pressure compared 176 with supportive care in infants diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome at any 177 time after birth.32 It included 6 trials with a total of 355 infants.
Recommended publications
  • Respiratory Support
    Intensive Care Nursery House Staff Manual Respiratory Support ABBREVIATIONS FIO2 Fractional concentration of O2 in inspired gas PaO2 Partial pressure of arterial oxygen PAO2 Partial pressure of alveolar oxygen PaCO2 Partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide PACO2 Partial pressure of alveolar carbon dioxide tcPCO2 Transcutaneous PCO2 PBAR Barometric pressure PH2O Partial pressure of water RQ Respiratory quotient (CO2 production/oxygen consumption) SaO2 Arterial blood hemoglobin oxygen saturation SpO2 Arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry PIP Peak inspiratory pressure PEEP Positive end-expiratory pressure CPAP Continuous positive airway pressure PAW Mean airway pressure FRC Functional residual capacity Ti Inspiratory time Te Expiratory time IMV Intermittent mandatory ventilation SIMV Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation HFV High frequency ventilation OXYGEN (Oxygen is a drug!): A. Most infants require only enough O2 to maintain SpO2 between 87% to 92%, usually achieved with PaO2 of 40 to 60 mmHg, if pH is normal. Patients with pulmonary hypertension may require a much higher PaO2. B. With tracheal suctioning, it may be necessary to raise the inspired O2 temporarily. This should not be ordered routinely but only when the infant needs it. These orders are good for only 24h. OXYGEN DELIVERY and MEASUREMENT: A. Oxygen blenders allow O2 concentration to be adjusted between 21% and 100%. B. Head Hoods permit non-intubated infants to breathe high concentrations of humidified oxygen. Without a silencer they can be very noisy. C. Nasal Cannulae allow non-intubated infants to breathe high O2 concentrations and to be less encumbered than with a head hood. O2 flows of 0.25-0.5 L/min are usually sufficient to meet oxygen needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Ventilator Management
    1. Ventilator Management Indications for Mechanical Ventilation Apnea Ventilatory insufficiency Increase in PaCo2 and decrease in ph Refractory hypoxemia Complications Associated with Mechanical Ventilation Hypotension Increased intrathoracic pressure decreases venous return to the heart Increased risk of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) Keep HOB at > 30 Maintain frequent, good oral care Problems with endotracheal tube Mucous plugging Tube my become dislodged Kinking or biting of tube Cuff rupture Pneumothorax Initial Ventilator Settings—parameters to be clarified Type of ventilation Mode of ventilation Tidal volume or peak inspiratory setting Respiratory rate FiO2 PEEP (Positive End Expiratory Pressure) Types of Ventilation Volume Cycled Ventilation(VCV) A pre-selected tidal volume is delivered at the pressure required. Tidal volume guaranteed. Peak inspiratory pressure will vary depending on airway resistance and lung compliance. Pressure Control Time-Cycled Ventilation (PCV) Operator selects inspiratory pressure and inspiratory time Breath is terminated when inspiratory time is reached Inspiratory pressure is guaranteed; tidal volume is dependant on airway resistance and lung compliance Pressure Support (PSV) Requires intact respiratory drive Operator selects inspiratory pressure Patient initiates breath, pressure quickly rises to set pressure and is maintained throughout the inspiratory phase Tidal volume determined by lung compliance and inspiratory effort Modes of Ventilation Assist/Control
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Ventilation
    Fundamentals of MMeecchhaanniiccaall VVeennttiillaattiioonn A short course on the theory and application of mechanical ventilators Robert L. Chatburn, BS, RRT-NPS, FAARC Director Respiratory Care Department University Hospitals of Cleveland Associate Professor Department of Pediatrics Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio Mandu Press Ltd. Cleveland Heights, Ohio Published by: Mandu Press Ltd. PO Box 18284 Cleveland Heights, OH 44118-0284 All rights reserved. This book, or any parts thereof, may not be used or reproduced by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review. First Edition Copyright 2003 by Robert L. Chatburn Library of Congress Control Number: 2003103281 ISBN, printed edition: 0-9729438-2-X ISBN, PDF edition: 0-9729438-3-8 First printing: 2003 Care has been taken to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to describe generally accepted practices. However, the author and publisher are not responsible for errors or omissions or for any consequences from application of the information in this book and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the contents of the publication. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION TO VENTILATION..............................1 Self Assessment Questions.......................................................... 4 Definitions................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury and Implications for Clinical Management
    Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury and Implications for Clinical Management C. EDIBAM Department of Critical Care Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SOUTH AUSTRALIA ABSTRACT Objective: To review recent studies in pathogenesis and management of ventilator-induced lung injury. Data sources: Articles and published reviews on ventilator-induced lung injury, barotrauma and acute lung injury. Summary of review: This review summarises the important differences between clinically apparent ‘barotrauma’ and the more subtle changes in lung structure and function associated with ventilation. Of great importance is the understanding that as the underlying lung injury worsens, the degree of injury from mechanical ventilation increases. An inflammatory process results from mechanical stimuli and this may contribute to distant organ dysfunction. A great deal of knowledge has been obtained from the use of animal models, however, one must be cautious about extrapolating these findings directly to the clinical setting without the use of adequately designed clinical trials. Tidal volume reduction and higher levels of PEEP and recruitment manoeuvres should be employed given the available evidence. The use of high frequency techniques, surfactant therapy despite their past track record, may prove to be exciting ‘re-discoveries’. Conclusions: Ventilator- induced lung injury is an iatrogenic disturbance that increases morbidity and mortality associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Tidal volume reduction and increased levels of PEEP reduce the plasma levels of inflammatory mediators and the mortality associated with ARDS. (Critical Care and Resuscitation 2000; 2: 269-277) Key words: Ventilator-induced lung injury, adult respiratory distress syndrome, PEEP Barotrauma during mechanical ventilation has long morphologic and physiological changes seen in animal been defined as the clinical appearance of extra- lungs, termed ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) are pulmonary air (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Ventilation Guidelines
    Newborn Critical Care Center (NCCC) Clinical Guidelines Conventional Mechanical Ventilation (CMV) BACKGROUND Mechanical ventilation is not a cure to underlying illness, but instead can be a lifesaving therapy which supports infants with respiratory failure while the underlying disease process resolves. Conventional mechanical ventilation and high frequency ventilation (HFV) are invasive therapies available for management of respiratory failure, while continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), high flow and low flow nasal cannula and oxyhood are examples of noninvasive therapies available for management of respiratory distress. Clinicians should provide infants with the appropriate level of respiratory support to ensure optimal oxygenation and ventilation while simultaneously minimizing injury. Providing infants with inadequate respiratory support may result in morbidity due to hypoxemia, hypercarbia and/or atelectotrauma, while providing infants with extraneous respiratory support may result in morbidity due to hyperoxia, hypocarbia, barotrauma and/or volutrauma. INDICATIONS Respiratory failure secondary to severe respiratory acidosis, hypoxemia or apnea Anticipated respiratory failure, such as immediately prior to a surgical procedure or with significant cardiovascular compromise Severe metabolic acidosis with concern for impending respiratory failure PHYSIOLOGY Ventilation (CO2): o Minute ventilation is the product of respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (Vt) 푉̇ = 푅푅 푥 푉푇 o Ventilation is, therefore, increased by increasing the RR or Vt. Oxygenation (O2): o Is dependent on the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and the recruitment of lung tissue to participate in gas exchange, which is dependent on mean airway pressure (MAP) o Oxygenation is increased by increasing the MAP within limits imposed by lung mechanics and by increasing the FiO2. The MAP is most effectively increased by increasing PEEP, but may also be increased by increasing the inspiratory time (Ti) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), if in a pressure mode.
    [Show full text]
  • Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
    Modes of Mechanical Ventilation And Protocol Overview • Lungs use ventilation (tidal volume and respiratory rate) to transfer CO2 from the blood to the alveoli and out of the body. Oxygenation (PEEP and FiO2) occurs when the oxygen transfers from the air in the lungs to the blood stream Overview • Mechanical ventilation provides positive pressure ventilation, while normal breathing is negative pressure Volume Control • Set respiratory rate, volume, FiO2, PEEP, and pause time. • “Square waveform” – Higher PIP (Peak Inspiratory Pressure is the highest level of pressure applied to the lungs – Low mean pressure (better venous return and cardiac output) Pressure Regulated Volume Control • Set respiratory rate, volume, FiO2, and PEEP • “Ramp waveform” – Least peak pressures – High mean airway pressure (helps lung inflation and oxygenation) Pressure Support/CPAP • Set pressure support above PEEP, PEEP, and FiO2 • Patient triggers breath with no dialed in volume nor respiratory rate • Volumes should be 85-90% of ideal volume • PIP=PS+PEEP • Mode before extubation. PS usually weaned down to 10 or 8 and PEEP to 5 Pressure Control • Set respiratory rate, pressure above PEEP, PEEP, and FiO2 • Patient’s volume will be determined on when the breath is shut off when set pressure is reached (PEEP + PC= PIP) Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation • Used with PRVC, VC, or PC • Set settings of mode and PS Bi Vent • Set P High, PEEP, T High, T PEEP, PS above P High, PS above PEEP, and FiO2 • Uses high MAP to oxygenate – Mean Airway Pressure correlates
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Vocabulary for Mechanical Ventilation Version 2.20.14
    Standardized Vocabulary for Mechanical Ventilation version 2.20.14 2012 by Mandu Press Ltd. active exhalation valve A mechanism for holding pressure in the breathing circuit by delivering the flow required to allow the patient breathe spontaneously. This feature is especially prominent in modes like Airway Pressure Release Ventilation that are intended to allow unrestricted spontaneous breathing during a prolonged mandatory (i.e., time triggered and time cycled) pressure controlled breath. asynchrony (dyssynchrony) Regarding the timing of a breath, asynchrony means triggering or cycling of an assisted breath that either leads or lags the patient’s inspiratory effort. Regarding the size of a breath, asynchrony means the inspiratory flow or tidal volume does not match the patient’s demand. Also, some ventilators allow a patient to inhale freely during a pressure controlled mandatory breath but not to exhale, thus inducing asynchrony. Asynchrony may lead to increased work of breathing and discomfort. adaptive targeting scheme A control system that allows the ventilator to automatically set some (or conceivably all) of the targets between breaths to achieve other preset targets. One common example is adaptive pressure targeting (e.g., Pressure Regulated Volume Control mode on the Maquet Servo-i ventilator) where a static inspiratory pressure is targeted within a breath (i.e., pressure controlled inspiration) but this target is automatically adjusted by the ventilator between breaths to achieve an operator set tidal volume target. airway pressure The pressure at the airway opening measured relative to atmospheric pressure during mechanical ventilation. airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) A form of pressure control intermittent mandatory ventilation that is designed to allow unrestricted spontaneous breathing throughout the breath cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation (TCAV)
    Mahajan et al. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (2019) 7:27 Intensive Care Medicine https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0250-5 Experimental RESEARCH Open Access Time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) accelerates simulated mucus clearance via increased expiratory flow rate Melissa Mahajan1†, David DiStefano1†, Joshua Satalin1* , Penny Andrews2, Hassan al-Khalisy1, Sarah Baker1, Louis A. Gatto3, Gary F. Nieman1 and Nader M. Habashi2 * Correspondence: satalinj@upstate. edu Abstract †David DiStefano and Melissa Mahajan are co-first authors who Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common contributed equally to this study. nosocomial infection in intensive care units. Distal airway mucus clearance has been 1Department of Surgery, SUNY shown to reduce VAP incidence. Studies suggest that mucus clearance is enhanced Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams St., 766 Irving Avenue, when the rate of expiratory flow is greater than inspiratory flow. The time-controlled Syracuse, NY 13210, USA adaptive ventilation (TCAV) protocol using the airway pressure release ventilation Full list of author information is (APRV) mode has a significantly increased expiratory relative to inspiratory flow rate, available at the end of the article as compared with the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSnet) protocol using the conventional ventilation mode of volume assist control (VAC). We hypothesized the TCAV protocol would be superior to the ARDSnet protocol at clearing mucus by a mechanism of net flow in the expiratory direction. Methods: Preserved pig lungs fitted with an endotracheal tube (ETT) were used as a model to study the effect of multiple combinations of peak inspiratory (IPF) and peak expiratory flow rate (EPF) on simulated mucus movement within the ETT.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume-Targeted Ventilation of Newborns Jaideep Singh, MD, Mrcpcha, Sunil K
    Clin Perinatol 34 (2007) 93–105 Volume-Targeted Ventilation of Newborns Jaideep Singh, MD, MRCPCHa, Sunil K. Sinha, MD, PhD, FRCP, FRCPCHb,*, Steven M. Donn, MDc aJames Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK bUniversity of Durham and James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK cDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0254, USA Traditionally, neonatal ventilation has been accomplished using time- cycled pressure-limited ventilation (TCPLV), wherein the peak inspiratory pressure is selected by the clinician and the ventilator provides each breath without exceeding this set pressure. Because peak pressure was believed to be the primary determinant of lung injury through barotrauma, it was as- sumed that TCPLV would limit lung injury by its ability to control peak pressure. This is an oversimplification. From recent observations it seems that it may actually be the volume of gas delivered to the lungs that is more likely to be the primary determinant of lung damage during mechan- ical ventilation [1]. This finding has given rise to the concept of volutrauma, which is fundamental to understanding the concept of lung volume-pressure hysteresis and the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) [2]. It has been shown in animal models that only six manual inflations of 35 to 40 mL/kg given to preterm lambs injures lungs and reduces the response to surfactant therapy [3]. Dreyfuss and colleagues [4] observed significant in- creases in lung edema and transcapillary albumin flux in rats ventilated at high tidal volumes in contrast to rats ventilated with low tidal volumes and high pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
    RESPIRATORY CARE Paper in Press. Published on October 21, 2014 as DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03410 Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC Introduction Pressure Airway Pressure Equation of Motion Alveolar Pressure Plateau Pressure Auto-PEEP Mean Airway Pressure Esophageal Pressure Transpulmonary Pressure Intra-Abdominal Pressure Transdiaphragmatic Pressure Asynchrony Stress Index Flow and Volume Time Constant Inspiratory Flow Expiratory Flow Tidal Volume End-Expiratory Lung Volume Derived Measurements Respiratory System Compliance Chest-Wall Compliance Lung Compliance Airway Resistance Work of Breathing Pressure-Volume Curves Flow-Volume Loops Tension-Time Index and Pressure-Time Product Esophageal Pressure for PEEP Titration Stress and Strain Spontaneous Breathing and Pressure-Targeted Ventilation Pleural Pressure and Hemodynamics During Mechanical Ventilation Respiratory mechanics refers to the expression of lung function through measures of pressure and flow. From these measurements, a variety of derived indices can be determined, such as volume, compliance, resistance, and work of breathing. Plateau pressure is a measure of end-inspiratory distending pressure. It has become increasingly appreciated that end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (stress) might be a better indicator of the potential for lung injury than plateau pressure alone. This has resulted in a resurgence of interest in the use of esophageal manometry in mechan- ically ventilated patients. End-expiratory transpulmonary pressure might also be useful to guide the RESPIRATORY CARE • NOVEMBER 2014 VOL 59 NO 11 1773 Copyright (C) 2014 Daedalus Enterprises ePub ahead of print papers have been peer-reviewed, accepted for publication, copy edited and proofread. However, this version may differ from the final published version in the online and print editions of RESPIRATORY CARE RESPIRATORY CARE Paper in Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Mode Improves Circulatory and Respiratory Function in Patients After Cardiopulmonary Bypass, a Randomized Trial
    fphys-12-684927 May 28, 2021 Time: 17:14 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 03 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.684927 Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Mode Improves Circulatory and Respiratory Function in Patients After Cardiopulmonary Bypass, a Randomized Trial Huiqing Ge1†, Ling Lin2†, Ying Xu1, Peifeng Xu1, Kailiang Duan1, Qing Pan3 and Kejing Ying4* 1 Department of Respiratory Care, Regional Medical Center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 3 College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China, 4 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care, Regional Medical Center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Importance: Postoperative pulmonary complications and cardiovascular complications Edited by: are major causes of morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization in cardiac Zhanqi Zhao, surgery patients. Furtwangen University, Germany Reviewed by: Objectives: To investigate the effects of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) on Daniel Rowley, respiration and hemodynamics in post cardiac surgery patients. University of Virginia Health System, United States Main Outcomes and Measures: A single-center randomized control trial was Lei Xu, Chongqing Emergency Medical performed. In total,
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Ventilator-Associated Event (Pedvae) for Use in Neonatal and Pediatric Locations Only
    January 2021 Pediatric Ventilator-Associated Event (PedVAE) For use in neonatal and pediatric locations only Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Settings ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Definitions .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Reporting Instructions ................................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 1: Pediatric Ventilator-Associated Events (PedVAE) Surveillance Algorithm .................................. 12 Numerator and Denominator Data ............................................................................................................ 13 Data Analyses ........................................................................................................................................... …14 Table 1: PedVAE Measures Available in NHSN……………………………………………………………………………………....15 References .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Appendix. List of Eligible Antimicrobial Agents .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]