New Mineral Names*
American Mineralogist, Volume 75, pages 931-937, 1990 NEW MINERAL NAMES* JOHN L. JAMBOR CANMET, 555 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OGI, Canada EDWARD S. GREW Department of Geological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, U.S.A. Akhtenskite* Electron-microprobe analyses (using a JXA-50A probe F.V. Chukhrov, A.I. Gorshkov, A.V. Sivtsov, V.V. Be~- for Au and Sb, and a JXA-5 probe for 0) of one aggregate ezovskaya, YU.P. Dikov, G.A. Dubinina, N.N. Van- gave Au 49.7, 50.1, 49.3, Sb 39.2, 39.1, 39.2, 0 10.7, nov (1989) Akhtenskite- The natural analog of t-Mn02. 11.2, 11.2, sum 99.6, 100.4, 99.7 wt%; a second aggregate Izvestiya Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. geol., No.9, 75-80 gave Au 52.4, 52.6, Sb 36.7, 36.3, 0 11.6, 11.4, sum (in Russian, English translation in Internat. Geol. Rev., 100.7, 100.3 wt%; the averages correspond to Au- 31, 1068-1072, 1989). F.V. Chukhrov, A.I. Gorshkov, V.S. Drits (1987) Ad- Sb1.2602.76and AU1.02Sblls02.83, respectively, close to a vances in the crystal chemistry of manganese oxides. theoretical composition AuSb03. H = 223.8 and 186.8 Zapiski Vses. Mineralog. Obshch. 16, 210-221 (in Rus- kg/mm2. No crystallographic parameters could be de- sian, English translation in Internat. Geol. Rev., 29, duced from the X-ray powder pattern, in which the fol- 434-444, 1987). lowing lines were present: 4.18( 100), 3.92(20), 3.72(30), 3.12(10), 2.08(10), 2.03(30), 1.
[Show full text]