DOCSLIB.ORG

Membership of RAE2008 Panels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Membership of RAE2008 panels November 2007 Ref RAE 03/2007 Membership of RAE2008 panels To Heads of HEFCE-funded higher education institutions Heads of HEFCW-funded higher education institutions Heads of SFC-funded higher education institutions Heads of universities in Northern Ireland Of interest to those Research assessment, Research policy, responsible for Planning Reference RAE 03/2007 Publication date November 2007 Enquiries to Raegan Hiles or Davina Madden tel 0117 931 7267 e-mail [email protected] Executive summary Purpose 1. This document lists the membership of the main and sub-panels for the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE2008). The panels will assess the quality of research in submissions to RAE2008. Key points 2. For the purpose of RAE2008, each academic discipline is assigned to one of 67 units of assessment (UOAs). There is a two-tier panel system: 67 sub-panels of experts, one for each UOA, work under the guidance of 15 main panels. Under each main panel are broadly cognate disciplines whose subjects have similar approaches to research. 3. Panel members are experts drawn from higher education institutions (HEIs) and the wider research community, and are nominated by subject associations and other stakeholder organisations. Each main panel and sub-panel has stipulated criteria and working methods that they will adhere to in making assessments: these were published in January 2006 as RAE 01/2006: RAE2008: Panel criteria and working methods. 4. This list of panel membership is correct at the time of going to print. Should any member retire from the panel or be replaced during 2008, we will update the electronic list available at www.rae.ac.uk under ‘Panels’. Action required 5. This document is for information and guidance. No action is required. RAE 03/2007 1 Introduction 6. This document contains details of the membership of the main and sub-panels which will peer review the research quality of submissions to RAE2008. Information about the process by which panel members were appointed is in RAE 03/2004: Units of assessment and recruitment of panel members. 7. Since May 2005, a dynamic version of the panel membership has been available in Excel spreadsheet format on the RAE2008 web-site www.rae.ac.uk under ‘Panels’. This list is updated on a regular basis. 8. This document includes updates to the panel membership since the panels were first established in 2004. 9. The panel membership is now set for the assessment phase of the exercise. We do not anticipate changes to the published panel membership except in extreme circumstances, for example if a member is no longer able to serve due to ill health and is therefore replaced. 2 RAE 03/2007 Section 1: Role of the panels Main panels International panel members 10. There are 15 main panels (A-O), each of 13. International panel members were appointed which work with a manageable, broadly cognate by the same nominations process as other panel group of no fewer than three sub-panels. The members. International members serve on the main panel is made up of: main panels to bring an international perspective to the endorsement of the quality profiles • the chair proposed by the related sub-panels. They were • the chairs of the sub-panels within the main invited to these posts as practising researchers panel grouping (between three and eight sub- with a very high level of knowledge of and panels per main panel area) expertise in research across a broad discipline area • international experts who act as full panel internationally, including substantial experience in members at least one country outside the UK. • where appropriate and possible, other people Sub-panels with specific expertise and observers. 14. Sub-panels are responsible for the detailed 11. The main panel provides leadership and assessment of research submissions to the guidance to the sub-panels on their approach to corresponding unit of assessment. Prior to this the assessment process; main panels were also detailed assessment, sub-panels were responsible responsible for approving the sub-panel criteria for producing draft criteria for assessment and for assessment and working methods. The main working methods for approval by the main panel. panel will work closely with the sub-panels They were guided in this by the RAE team. The throughout the assessment period in order to sub-panels have a duty to work within the agreed ensure consistency in application of quality criteria and in collaboration with the main panel, standards, common procedures and equal to produce draft quality profiles and associated opportunities guidance. In signing off the quality feedback for all submissions made to them. In profiles assigned to the submissions, the main doing so, they will take advice where necessary panels will confirm that in their view each of the from other sub-panels via the cross-referral sub-panels has adopted reasonable and consistent process, or specialist advisors. subject-specific approaches to the assessment of all forms of research, including basic, applied Specialist advisors practice-based and interdisciplinary research. The 15. Specialist advisors will be appointed where a main panel will also produce a final report on the sub-panel has to assess either significant work in a state of research in the disciplines covered by the sub-disciplinary area that crosses the boundaries sub-panels. of units of assessment, or work that the members of the sub-panel do not collectively have the Main panel chairs expertise to assess. 12. The main panel chair guides the main and relevant sub-panels to ensure that they complete Panel advisors and secretaries the assessment within the framework and 16. Each main panel area – the main panel, and according to the published criteria and working its associated sub-panels – has dedicated methods. The overriding responsibility of the secretariat support for the assessment phase. This main panel chair is to ensure that throughout the support comprises a panel advisor and panel exercise, panels and sub-panels adhere to the key secretary, each seconded from UK HEIs. The principles that govern the RAE2008 as set out in advisor will provide policy and procedural advice RAE 03/2005: Guidance on submissions. to the panel, and is seconded on a part-time basis in 2008 to support the main panel area. The RAE 03/2007 3 secretary will provide policy, procedural and secretariat support, and is seconded on a full-time basis in 2008 to work with the main panel area. The advisor will take shadow minutes and provide secretariat support if the secretary has to leave the meeting, for example if an institution which the secretary has a conflict of interest in is being discussed. 4 RAE 03/2007 Section 2: Appointment of membership of panels 17. Main panel chairs were appointed following appropriate – by contacting nominating bodies to advertisement of these posts and an application secure further nominations. process in early 2004. 22. Following the initial recruitment of panel 18. Sub-panel chairs and panel members were members, the panel membership was published nominated by nominating bodies who are on the RAE2008 web-site. Since then, the online stakeholders in the exercise, such as learned list has been regularly updated to reflect changes societies, professional bodies and other in the membership. organisations with an interest in research, 23. In summer 2006, the RAE team undertook including research users. The RAE team equal opportunities monitoring of all panel undertook a nominations exercise in 2004 to members serving in the RAE 2008. A summary secure nominations from these bodies. HEIs were report of this exercise and the results is available not eligible to act as nominating bodies. on the RAE web-site, www.rae.ac.uk, under 19. The funding bodies’ chief executives ‘Panels’. appointed 67 sub-panel chairs after considering 24. Specialist advisors will be appointed the nominations for individuals and taking advice following nominations from nominating bodies in confidence from the relevant main panel chairs. and advice from the panel chair, as with panel Similarly, sub-panel members were appointed by membership appointments. the funding bodies’ chief executives from among those nominated, taking account of the weight of nominations and advice from the relevant sub- panel and main panel chairs. In appointing sub- panel members, the funding bodies aimed to ensure that the collective expertise of each sub- panel was appropriate for the unit of assessment, and that the overall body of members reflected the diversity of the UK research community. Details of the selection process for sub-panel chairs and panel membership are in RAE 03/2004: Units of assessment and recruitment of panel members. 20. Panel members, including main and sub- panel chairs, may not be the head of a UK HEI. In cases where a panel member has been appointed to a vice-chancellor or principal post in a UK HEI since the establishment of RAE2008 panels, they have stepped down from the panel and a suitable replacement has been sought. 21. Since 2004, the panel membership has changed slightly to accommodate circumstances where panel members have had to relinquish their post, or further expertise has been required.
Recommended publications
  • Mothers in Science

    Mothers in Science

    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
  • Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams

    Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams

    Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Alba Carballo González for support and encouragement. 1 Table of Contents Sofia Kovalevskaya ................................................................................................................................. 4 Emmy Noether ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Mary Cartwright ................................................................................................................................... 26 Julia Robinson ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Olga Ladyzhenskaya ............................................................................................................................. 46 Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat ....................................................................................................................... 56 Olga Oleinik .......................................................................................................................................... 67 Charlotte Fischer .................................................................................................................................. 77 Karen Uhlenbeck .................................................................................................................................. 87 Krystyna Kuperberg .............................................................................................................................
  • REPORTER No 6396 W E D N E S D Ay 23 S E P T E M B E R 2015 V O L C X Lv I N O 1

    REPORTER No 6396 W E D N E S D Ay 23 S E P T E M B E R 2015 V O L C X Lv I N O 1

    CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY REPORTER NO 6396 W ED N E S D AY 23 S EPTEMBER 2015 V OL CXLV I N O 1 CONTENTS Notices Notices by Faculty Boards, etc. Calendar 2 Natural Sciences Tripos, Part II (Biological Notice of a Discussion on Tuesday, 13 October and Biomedical Sciences), 2015–16 11 2015 2 Natural Sciences Tripos, Part III (Experimental Preacher at Mere’s Commemoration in 2016 2 and Theoretical Physics) and Master of Nomination of the Proctors and Deputy Advanced Studies in Physics, 2015–16 12 Proctors for 2015–16 2 Form and conduct of examinations, 2016 Annual Reports 2 Asian and Middle Eastern Studies Tripos, Examination results statistics 2 Part II, 2016: correction 13 Vacancies, appointments, etc. Obituaries Electors to the Professorship of Comparative Obituary Notices 14 Philology 3 Graces Electors to the Professorship of Immunology 3 Grace submitted to the Regent House on Electors to the Sir Patrick Sheehy 23 September 2015 14 Professorship of International Relations 3 Acta Electors to the Professorship of Medieval History 4 Approval of Grace submitted to the Regent Electors to the William Wyse Professorship of House on 29 July 2015 14 Social Anthropology 4 Vacancies in the University 4 End of the Official Part of the ‘Reporter’ Elections, appointments, reappointment, and College Notices grants of title 5 Elections 15 Awards, etc. Vacancies 16 Scholarships and Prizes, etc. awarded 7 Other Notices 17 Events, courses, etc. Notice by the University Bellringer 17 Announcement of lectures, seminars, etc. 8 External Notices Notices by the General Board University of Oxford 17 Regulations for the University Library 9 The Cambridge Humanities Research Grants Scheme 9 Regulations for examinations Classical Tripos, Part II 10 Modern and Medieval Languages Tripos, Part IB 10 Bachelor of Theology for Ministry 10 PLISUB HED BY AUTHORITY 2 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY REPORTER 23 September 2015 NOTICES Calendar 1 October, Thursday.
  • Fellows Opted out of the Mentoring Programme As of 19 March 2020 1

    Fellows Opted out of the Mentoring Programme As of 19 March 2020 1

    Fellows opted out of the Mentoring programme as of 19 March 2020 Professor Chris Abell FRS FMedSci Professor Kamlesh Khunti FMedSci Professor Thomas Kirkwood CBE Professor David Adams FMedSci FMedSci Professor Judith Allen FRSE FMedSci Professor Robb Krumlauf FMedSci Professor Charalambos Kyriacou Professor Desmond Archer OBE FMedSci FMedSci Professor Louise Arseneault FMedSci Sir Peter Lachmann FRS FMedSci Professor Michael Arthur FMedSci Professor Leon Lagnado FMedSci Professor Deborah Ashby OBE FMedSci Professor Ajit Lalvani FMedSci Professor Dame Frances Ashcroft DBE Professor Deborah Lawlor CBE FMedSci FRS FMedSci Professor Anthony Barrett FRS FMedSci Professor Joy Lawn FMedSci Professor Facundo Batista FMedSci Professor Susan Lea FMedSci Professor Stephan Beck FMedSci Professor Sir Robert Lechler PMedSci Professor Jill Belch OBE FMedSci Dr Melanie Lee CBE FMedSci Professor Sir John Bell GBE FRS Professor Andrew Lees FMedSci HonFREng FMedSci Professor Wendy Bickmore FRS FRSE Professor Stafford Lightman FRS FMedSci FMedSci Professor Sir Adrian Bird CBE FRS FRSE Professor Janet Lord FMedSci FMedSci Professor Ewan Birney CBE FRS Professor Thomas MacDonald FMedSci FMedSci Professor Dorothy Bishop FRS FBA Professor Rona MacKie CBE FRSE FMedSci FMedSci Sir Stephen Bloom FRS FMedSci Professor Giovanna Mallucci FMedSci Sir Tom Blundell FRS FMedSci Dr Fiona Marshall FMedSci Professor Dame Theresa Marteau DBE Professor Peter Boyle FRSE FMedSci FMedSci Professor Sir Michael Brady FRS FREng Professor Duncan Maskell FMedSci FMedSci Professor
  • Immune Homeostasis

    Immune Homeostasis

    IMMUNE HOMEOSTASIS FUNDED PROJECTS FROM THE INNOVATION WORKSHOP 18-20 JULY 2017 AIMS THE SANDPIT PROCESS CAN BE BROKEN DOWN The immune system continues to intrigue and test us: as we get closer to finding ways of harnessing or modulating immune responses, new and unexpected consequences and INTO SEVERAL STAGES: challenges present themselves, often testing even our most fundamental understanding. Cancer Research UK and Arthritis Research UK came together to engage the research community to tackle the specific challenge of understanding how the immune system regulates itself under normal physiological conditions (immune homeostasis), how it is • Defining the scope of the challenge dysregulated in different diseases and how we can stimulate the immune response to prevent • Sharing understanding of the challenge and expertise brought to the sandpit by or treat disease (immunotherapy). participants We brought together researchers and clinicians in the fields of inflammatory disease, cancer, • Evolving common languages and terminologies amongst people from a diverse theoretical physics, computational medicine and other areas, whose expertise could be applied range of backgrounds and disciplines to the key questions concerning immune homeostasis. This workshop encouraged participants from a diverse range of backgrounds to melt barriers, develop a common language to promote • Breaking down preconceptions of researchers and stakeholders collaboration, and suggest new ways to harness the immune system to treat disease. • Taking part in break-out sessions focussed on challenges, using creative thinking techniques Director • Capturing outputs in the form of highly innovative feasibility study proposals The role of the Director was to work with the facilitators to lead the event and guide the process • A funding decision on those proposals at the sandpit, using “real time” peer-review.
  • Department of Physics Review

    Department of Physics Review

    The Blackett Laboratory Department of Physics Review Faculty of Natural Sciences 2008/09 Contents Preface from the Head of Department 2 Undergraduate Teaching 54 Academic Staff group photograph 9 Postgraduate Studies 59 General Departmental Information 10 PhD degrees awarded (by research group) 61 Research Groups 11 Research Grants Grants obtained by research group 64 Astrophysics 12 Technical Development, Intellectual Property 69 and Commercial Interactions (by research group) Condensed Matter Theory 17 Academic Staff 72 Experimental Solid State 20 Administrative and Support Staff 76 High Energy Physics 25 Optics - Laser Consortium 30 Optics - Photonics 33 Optics - Quantum Optics and Laser Science 41 Plasma Physics 38 Space and Atmospheric Physics 45 Theoretical Physics 49 Front cover: Laser probing images of jet propagating in ambient plasma and a density map from a 3D simulation of a nested, stainless steel, wire array experiment - see Plamsa Physics group page 38. 1 Preface from the Heads of Department During 2008 much of the headline were invited by, Ian Pearson MP, the within the IOP Juno code of practice grabbing news focused on ‘big science’ Minister of State for Science and (available to download at with serious financial problems at the Innovation, to initiate a broad ranging www.ioppublishing.com/activity/diver Science and Technology Facilities review of physics research under sity/Gender/Juno_code_of_practice/ Council (STFC) (we note that some the chairmanship of Professor Bill page_31619.html). As noted in the 40% of the Department’s research Wakeham (Vice-Chancellor of IOP document, “The code … sets expenditure is STFC derived) and Southampton University). The stated out practical ideas for actions that the start-up of the Large Hadron purpose of the review was to examine departments can take to address the Collider at CERN.
  • Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun Eric Priest Frontmatter More Information

    Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun Eric Priest Frontmatter More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85471-9 - Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun Eric Priest Frontmatter More information Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun describes the subtle and complex interaction between the Sun’s plasma atmosphere and its magnetic field, which is responsible for many fascinating dynamic phenomena. Chapters cover the generation of the Sun’s magnetic field by dynamo action, magnetoconvection and the nature of photospheric flux tubes such as sunspots, the heating of the outer atmosphere by waves or reconnection, the structure of prominences, the nature of eruptive instability and magnetic reconnection in solar flares and coronal mass ejections, and the acceleration of the solar wind by reconnection or wave-turbulence. Developed for a graduate course at St Andrews University, this advanced textbook provides a detailed account of our progress towards answering the key unsolved puzzles in solar physics. It is essential reading for graduate students and researchers in solar physics and related fields of astronomy, plasma physics and fluid dynamics. Problem sets and other resources are available at www.cambridge.org/9780521854719. Eric Priest was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1985, of the Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters in 1994, of the Royal Society in 2002 and of the European Academy of Sciences in 2005. He has delivered many named lectures, including the James Arthur Prize Lecture at Harvard and the Lindsay Memorial Lecture at the Goddard Space Flight Center. He was awarded the Hale Prize of the American Astronomical Society, only the second time it has been awarded to a British scientist, and the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society.
  • OPTICS CENTENARY EVENT (A Chronicle)

    OPTICS CENTENARY EVENT (A Chronicle)

    OPTICS CENTENARY EVENT (A Chronicle) IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON 8TH SEPTEMBER 2017 RECOLLECTIONS Queens Tower, Imperial College © CONTENTS 1.0 Prologue ………………………………………………………………………………………………2 2.0 Welcome ……………………………………………………………………………………………..3 3.0 Organization ………………………………………………………………………………………..4 4.0 Compendium of Optical Achievements at Imperial College ………………….5 5.0 The Centenary Event ……………………………………………………………………………6 5.1 The Program…………………………………………………………………………………………6 5.2 Program Abstracts………………………………………………………………………………..7 Session 1 5.2.1 Dainty…………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 5.2.2 Taylor……………………………………………………………………………………………………8 5.2.3 French…………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Session 2 5.2.4 Knight………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 5.2.5 Dorman……………………………………………………………………………………………….12 5.2.6 Walmsley…………………………………………………………………………………………….13 5.3 Closing Address – Weir………………………………………………………………………..14 6.0 Attendee/Sponsor Remarks …………………………………………………….............15 6.1.1 Attendee: Kevin Hopkins, MP……………………………………………………………..15 Attendee: David E. L. Freeman, Msc, DIC…………………………………………….16 6.2.1.2 Sponsors………………………………………………………………………………………………16 6.2.1 Sponsor: OSA………………………………………………………………………………………17 6.2.2 Sponsor: SPIE………………………………………………………………………………………18 6.2.3 Sponsor: SYNOPSYS…………………………………………………………………………….20 7.0 Appendices …………………………………………………………………………………………21 7.1 Event Photos...…………………………………………………………………………………….22 7.2 End of a Perfect Day.……………………………………………………………………………32 1 1.0 PROLOGUE On 8 September 2017, a centennial celebration was held by the
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    EU ACADEMY OF SCIENCES EUAS EU ACADEMY 2017 ANNUAL REPORT EU ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Board of Governors President Professor E.G. Ladopoulos (2000 Outstanding Scientists 20th-21st Centuries) Governors Board of Governors in the Division of Engineering and Physics: Professor S. Glashow (Nobel Physics 1979) Professor J. Friedman (Nobel Physics 1990) Professor G. Smoot (Nobel Physics 2006) Board of Governors in the Division of Chemistry: Professor Y.T. Lee (Nobel Chemistry 1986) Professor R. Ernst (Nobel Chemistry 1991) Professor M.Levitt (Nobel Chemistry 2013). Professor F. Stoddart (Nobel Chemistry 2016). Board of Governors in the Division of Medicine: Professor C. Greider (Nobel Medicine 2009) Professor R. Schekman (Nobel Medicine 2013) Professor S. Yamanaka (Nobel Medicine 2012). Board of Governors in the Division of Social Sciences, Law & Economics: Professor D. Kahneman (Nobel Economics 2002) Professor P. Krugman (Nobel Economics 2008) Professor J. Stiglitz (Nobel Economics 2001) Professor E. S. Phelps (Nobel Economics 2006). 1 EU ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Contents 7 Maximum Speed of Light for the Future Spacecraft by Relativistic Elasticity, Thermo-Elasticity & Universal Mechanics Suitable for the Nobel prize ? by Prof. Evangelos Ladopoulos, President & CEO of EUAS 12 Innovative & Groundbreaking Supramolecular Chemistry and Nanotechnology – Nobel Lecture. by Prof. Sir Fraser Stoddart, Governor EUAS 18 Strategies for delivering Biotech Macromolecules: the Small Intestine, Cheek, and Joints. by Prof. David J. Brayden, Member EUAS 22 Earthquake and Structural Engineering. by Prof. Guiqing Li, Member EUAS 26 Digital Content Analytics and Computational Science. by Prof. Fionn Murtagh, Member EUAS 29 Advanced Materials for Energy Storage & Conversion. by Prof.
  • Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136

    Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136

    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2013 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2013. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Harald Ade Takaaki Akaike Heather Allen Ariel Amir Scott Aaronson Karen Adelman Katerina Akassoglou Icarus Allen Ido Amit Stuart Aaronson Zach Adelman Arne Akbar John Allen Angelika Amon Adam Abate Pia Adelroth Erol Akcay Karen Allen Hubert Amrein Abul Abbas David Adelson Mark Akeson Lisa Allen Serge Amselem Tarek Abbas Alan Aderem Anna Akhmanova Nicola Allen Derk Amsen Jonathan Abbatt Neil Adger Shizuo Akira Paul Allen Esther Amstad Shahal Abbo Noam Adir Ramesh Akkina Philip Allen I. Jonathan Amster Patrick Abbot Jess Adkins Klaus Aktories Toby Allen Ronald Amundson Albert Abbott Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Muhammad Alam James Allison Katrin Amunts Geoff Abbott Roee Admon Eric Alani Mead Allison Myron Amusia Larry Abbott Walter Adriani Pietro Alano Isabel Allona Gynheung An Nicholas Abbott Ruedi Aebersold Cedric Alaux Robin Allshire Zhiqiang An Rasha Abdel Rahman Ueli Aebi Maher Alayyoubi Abigail Allwood Ranjit Anand Zalfa Abdel-Malek Martin Aeschlimann Richard Alba Julian Allwood Beau Ances Minori Abe Ruslan Afasizhev Salim Al-Babili Eric Alm David Andelman Kathryn Abel Markus Affolter Salvatore Albani Benjamin Alman John Anderies Asa Abeliovich Dritan Agalliu Silas Alben Steven Almo Gregor Anderluh John Aber David Agard Mark Alber Douglas Almond Bogi Andersen Geoff Abers Aneel Aggarwal Reka Albert Genevieve Almouzni George Andersen Rohan Abeyaratne Anurag Agrawal R. Craig Albertson Noga Alon Gregers Andersen Susan Abmayr Arun Agrawal Roy Alcalay Uri Alon Ken Andersen Ehab Abouheif Paul Agris Antonio Alcami Claudio Alonso Olaf Andersen Soman Abraham H.
  • Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 the Centre for Science and Policy in 2015

    Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 the Centre for Science and Policy in 2015

    Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 The Centre for Science and Policy in 2015 The policy challenges facing our world today demand ever-greater foresight, ingenuity and a willingness to collaborate across sectors. As this report illustrates, “Over the seven years since its launch, the Centre for Science the Centre for Science and Policy has been helping its network to navigate and Policy has pioneered new ways of bringing academia and challenges from climate resilience to new forms of healthcare; from national government together to tackle policy challenges. CSaP has security to shaping innovation in the public interest. successfully promoted long-term thinking and more robust networks of expertise and evidence for public policy. The maturity of CSaP’s unique network of academics As he moves on to chair CSaP’s Advisory Council, I and policy makers is demonstrated by the breadth would like to express my gratitude to David for his Dr Robert Doubleday and depth of our work during 2015. Our network inspirational work in founding the Centre. Executive Director Centre for Science and Policy 2015 is the year in which the Centre came of age. Having now encompasses over 200 Fellows and more than served as its founding director from 2009 to 2015, I am 1100 researchers and, during the year, we welcomed In 2016, a year set to be every bit as challenging for delighted CSaP is playing a central role in supporting the more than 2500 participants to 43 events. governments as 2015 has been, CSaP’s role in brokering links between research and policy will be University’s mission, and that the Centre is in the excellent These achievements are testimony to the vision of more important than ever.
  • Simvastatin Causes Pulmonary Artery Relaxation by Blocking Smooth Muscle ROCK and Calcium Channels: Evidence for an Endothelium-Independent Mechanism

    Simvastatin Causes Pulmonary Artery Relaxation by Blocking Smooth Muscle ROCK and Calcium Channels: Evidence for an Endothelium-Independent Mechanism

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Simvastatin causes pulmonary artery relaxation by blocking smooth muscle ROCK and calcium channels: Evidence for an endothelium-independent mechanism 1,2 1,3 1 1 1 Mais Absi , Basma G. Eid , Nick Ashton , George Hart , Alison M. GurneyID * 1 Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Core Technology Facility level, a1111111111 Manchester, United Kingdom, 2 Cardiovascular Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom, 3 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, a1111111111 Saudi Arabia a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 Abstract Simvastatin reduces pulmonary arterial pressure and right ventricular hypertrophy in animal OPEN ACCESS models of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and is thought to restore endothelial dys- Citation: Absi M, Eid BG, Ashton N, Hart G, Gurney function. In vivo effects of drugs are complicated by several factors and little is known of the AM (2019) Simvastatin causes pulmonary artery relaxation by blocking smooth muscle ROCK and direct effects of statins on pulmonary arteries. This study investigated the direct effects of calcium channels: Evidence for an endothelium- simvastatin on pulmonary arteries isolated from rats with or without monocrotaline-induced independent mechanism. PLoS ONE 14(8): PAH. Simvastatin suppressed contractions evoked by the thromboxane A2 receptor agonist e0220473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. U46619 (30 nM), the α ±adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (5 μM) and KCl (50 mM) by pone.0220473 1 ~50% in healthy and diseased arteries, but did not reduce contraction evoked by sarco/ Editor: Alexander G. Obukhov, Indiana University endoplasmic reticulum ATPase blockers. It relaxed hypertensive arteries in the absence of School of Medicine, UNITED STATES stimulation.