LMS – EPSRC Durham Symposium
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mothers in Science
The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond. -
Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams
Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Alba Carballo González for support and encouragement. 1 Table of Contents Sofia Kovalevskaya ................................................................................................................................. 4 Emmy Noether ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Mary Cartwright ................................................................................................................................... 26 Julia Robinson ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Olga Ladyzhenskaya ............................................................................................................................. 46 Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat ....................................................................................................................... 56 Olga Oleinik .......................................................................................................................................... 67 Charlotte Fischer .................................................................................................................................. 77 Karen Uhlenbeck .................................................................................................................................. 87 Krystyna Kuperberg ............................................................................................................................. -
From Arthur Cayley Via Felix Klein, Sophus Lie, Wilhelm Killing, Elie Cartan, Emmy Noether and Superstrings to Cantorian Space–Time
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 37 (2008) 1279–1288 www.elsevier.com/locate/chaos From Arthur Cayley via Felix Klein, Sophus Lie, Wilhelm Killing, Elie Cartan, Emmy Noether and superstrings to Cantorian space–time L. Marek-Crnjac Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, Jadranska ulica 19, P.O. Box 2964, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia Abstract In this work we present a historical overview of mathematical discoveries which lead to fundamental developments in super string theory, super gravity and finally to E-infinity Cantorian space–time theory. Cantorian space–time is a hierarchical fractal-like semi manifold with formally infinity many dimensions but a finite expectation number for these dimensions. The idea of hierarchy and self-similarity in science was first entertain by Right in the 18th century, later on the idea was repeated by Swedenborg and Charlier. Interestingly, the work of Mohamed El Naschie and his two contra parts Ord and Nottale was done independently without any knowledge of the above starting from non- linear dynamics and fractals. Ó 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction Many of the profound mathematical discovery and dare I say also inventions which were made by the mathemati- cians Arthur Cayley, Felix Klein, Sophus Lie, Wilhelm Killing, Elie Cartan and Emmy Noether [1] are extremely important for high energy particles in general [2] as well as in the development of E-infinity, Cantorian space–time the- ory [3,4]. The present paper is dedicated to the historical background of this subject. 2. Arthur Cayley – beginner of the group theory in the modern way Arthur Cayley was a great British mathematician. -
TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual
2016 TRINITY COLLEGE cambridge trinity college cambridge annual record annual record 2016 Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record 2015–2016 Trinity College Cambridge CB2 1TQ Telephone: 01223 338400 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.trin.cam.ac.uk Contents 5 Editorial 11 Commemoration 12 Chapel Address 15 The Health of the College 18 The Master’s Response on Behalf of the College 25 Alumni Relations & Development 26 Alumni Relations and Associations 37 Dining Privileges 38 Annual Gatherings 39 Alumni Achievements CONTENTS 44 Donations to the College Library 47 College Activities 48 First & Third Trinity Boat Club 53 Field Clubs 71 Students’ Union and Societies 80 College Choir 83 Features 84 Hermes 86 Inside a Pirate’s Cookbook 93 “… Through a Glass Darkly…” 102 Robert Smith, John Harrison, and a College Clock 109 ‘We need to talk about Erskine’ 117 My time as advisor to the BBC’s War and Peace TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 3 123 Fellows, Staff, and Students 124 The Master and Fellows 139 Appointments and Distinctions 141 In Memoriam 155 A Ninetieth Birthday Speech 158 An Eightieth Birthday Speech 167 College Notes 181 The Register 182 In Memoriam 186 Addresses wanted CONTENTS TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 4 Editorial It is with some trepidation that I step into Boyd Hilton’s shoes and take on the editorship of this journal. He managed the transition to ‘glossy’ with flair and panache. As historian of the College and sometime holder of many of its working offices, he also brought a knowledge of its past and an understanding of its mysteries that I am unable to match. -
Arthur Cayley English Version
ARTHUR CAYLEY (August 16, 1821 – January 26, 1895) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK, Germany Born in Richmond (Surrey), ARTHUR CAYLEY, the son of the English merchant HENRY CAYLEY, initially grew up in St Petersburg, Russia. When the family returned to England, he attended King's College in London. He entered Trinity College, Cambridge University at 17, graduated in mathematics at the age of 21 (as senior wrangler) and won the Smith's Prize, an award for students who have shown exceptional performance throughout their studies. During his studies, he published three articles in the Cambridge Mathematical Journal. In the two years after the bachelor's degree, during which he supervised new students as a tutor, there were another 28 contributions. After passing his master's degree, he decided to become a lawyer in order to earn a better living. In the following five years he worked for a well-known London notary before he was admitted to the bar in 1849. During this time he met JAMES JOSEPH SYLVESTER, who had the same interests as him. The two became friends; their conversations were always and almost exclusively about mathematical topics. CAYLEY worked as a lawyer for 14 years – and published over 250 scientific papers during this time, before he was appointed to the SADLEIRian Chair, a chair for pure mathematics at the University of Cambridge, in 1863. Although he now had only a fraction of the income he previously had as a lawyer, he was happy with the work he was able to do until his death in 1895. In total, he published 967 articles that dealt with topics from all current research areas of mathematics, and including one textbook (on JACOBI's elliptical functions). -
LMS Prize Winners
id745843 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com De Morgan House 57-58 Russell S quare London WC1B 4HS Media release 22 June 2007 Embargoed until 15:30 hrs Mathematician honoured for his $1 million dollar question The London Mathematical Society has awarded its foremost prize, the De Morgan Medal, to a mathematician who developed a problem which has yet to be solved. The LMS Council announced that Professor Bryan Birch, of the University of Oxford, had been awarded the triennial prize in recognition of his influential contributions to modern number theory. This area of mathematics is used in ensuring the security of Pin numbers and communications generally. In particular, Professor Birch worked with Professor Sir Peter Swinnerton-Dyer, of the University of Cambridge, to create a new area of arithmetic algebraic geometry. Together they formulated the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer conjectures. Despite the best efforts of some of the greatest mathematical minds these remarkable conjectures are still open after 40 years and are amongst seven classic unsolved mathematical problems identified by the Clay Mathematics Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Institute is offering $1 million prizes for their proofs. Professor John Toland, President of the LMS, said, “These remarkable conjectures are still open and a million dollar prize awaits anyone who comes up with a proof. For these conjectures, and for many other seminal contributions, we honour Professor Birch today.” Professor Toland quoted mathematician Georg Cantor, who, in 1867 said, “In mathematics, the art of proposing a question must be held of higher value than solving it.” The Council for the LMS announced the De Morgan Medal and other prize winners at the Society Meeting held at University College London on 22 June. -
Linking Together Members of the Mathematical Carlos Rocha, University of Lisbon; Jean Taylor, Cour- Community from the US and Abroad
NEWSLETTER OF THE EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Features Epimorphism Theorem Prime Numbers Interview J.-P. Bourguignon Societies European Physical Society Research Centres ESI Vienna December 2013 Issue 90 ISSN 1027-488X S E European M M Mathematical E S Society Cover photo: Jean-François Dars Mathematics and Computer Science from EDP Sciences www.esaim-cocv.org www.mmnp-journal.org www.rairo-ro.org www.esaim-m2an.org www.esaim-ps.org www.rairo-ita.org Contents Editorial Team European Editor-in-Chief Ulf Persson Matematiska Vetenskaper Lucia Di Vizio Chalmers tekniska högskola Université de Versailles- S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden St Quentin e-mail: [email protected] Mathematical Laboratoire de Mathématiques 45 avenue des États-Unis Zdzisław Pogoda 78035 Versailles cedex, France Institute of Mathematicsr e-mail: [email protected] Jagiellonian University Society ul. prof. Stanisława Copy Editor Łojasiewicza 30-348 Kraków, Poland Chris Nunn e-mail: [email protected] Newsletter No. 90, December 2013 119 St Michaels Road, Aldershot, GU12 4JW, UK Themistocles M. Rassias Editorial: Meetings of Presidents – S. Huggett ............................ 3 e-mail: [email protected] (Problem Corner) Department of Mathematics A New Cover for the Newsletter – The Editorial Board ................. 5 Editors National Technical University Jean-Pierre Bourguignon: New President of the ERC .................. 8 of Athens, Zografou Campus Mariolina Bartolini Bussi GR-15780 Athens, Greece Peter Scholze to Receive 2013 Sastra Ramanujan Prize – K. Alladi 9 (Math. Education) e-mail: [email protected] DESU – Universitá di Modena e European Level Organisations for Women Mathematicians – Reggio Emilia Volker R. Remmert C. Series ............................................................................... 11 Via Allegri, 9 (History of Mathematics) Forty Years of the Epimorphism Theorem – I-42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy IZWT, Wuppertal University [email protected] D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany P. -
Regulations of LMS Prizes LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY
Regulations of LMS Prizes LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY PRIZE REGULATIONS: De MORGAN MEDAL I. GENERAL 1. The De Morgan Memorial Medal award was instituted by the Society in memory of Professor A. De Morgan, its first President. Later Sir Joseph Larmor left a bequest to the Society, the income from which was to be used to augment the Medal Fund. 2. The award of the De Morgan Medal shall be considered triennially by the Council of the Society, in those years numbered by a multiple of three. 3. No person shall be eligible to receive the Medal more than once. 4. The Medal shall be awarded to a mathematician who is normally resident in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the 1st January of the year of the award. 5. The sole grounds for the award of the Medal shall be the candidate's contributions to mathematics. 6. Any amendment to these Regulations for the award of the Medal must be made at a regular meeting of Council at which the proposed amendment must receive the support of an absolute majority of those present at the meeting, whether voting or not, in order to take effect. II. PROCEDURE FOR THE AWARD OF THE DE MORGAN MEDAL IN YEAR X 1. In October, year x, the Council of the Society shall appoint a Medal Committee consisting of from three to nine members of the Society, at least one of whom is not a member of its Council, and shall invite one of them to act as convenor; normally the Committee shall have at least one member on each other Prize Committee appointed, and any number of the Prize Committees may have identical memberships. -
Public Recognition and Media Coverage of Mathematical Achievements
Journal of Humanistic Mathematics Volume 9 | Issue 2 July 2019 Public Recognition and Media Coverage of Mathematical Achievements Juan Matías Sepulcre University of Alicante Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Sepulcre, J. "Public Recognition and Media Coverage of Mathematical Achievements," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, Volume 9 Issue 2 (July 2019), pages 93-129. DOI: 10.5642/ jhummath.201902.08 . Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol9/iss2/8 ©2019 by the authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. JHM is an open access bi-annual journal sponsored by the Claremont Center for the Mathematical Sciences and published by the Claremont Colleges Library | ISSN 2159-8118 | http://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/ The editorial staff of JHM works hard to make sure the scholarship disseminated in JHM is accurate and upholds professional ethical guidelines. However the views and opinions expressed in each published manuscript belong exclusively to the individual contributor(s). The publisher and the editors do not endorse or accept responsibility for them. See https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/policies.html for more information. Public Recognition and Media Coverage of Mathematical Achievements Juan Matías Sepulcre Department of Mathematics, University of Alicante, Alicante, SPAIN [email protected] Synopsis This report aims to convince readers that there are clear indications that society is increasingly taking a greater interest in science and particularly in mathemat- ics, and thus society in general has come to recognise, through different awards, privileges, and distinctions, the work of many mathematicians. -
October 2008
THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER No. 374 October 2008 Society THE PROPOSAL FOR A NEW SOCIETY Meetings In all likelihood you will now have present form fulfil many of the and Events received a copy of the proposal hopes and expectations of their for a new society, combining the members, times are changing and 2008 present London Mathematical the need for mathematics as a uni- Friday 21 November Society and Institute of Mathe- fied activity to hold and defend AGM, London matics and its Applications. For its position in the public sphere [page 3] a new society to be formed, the grows constantly greater. IMA and the LMS must both vote As the Presidents’ letter which 12–13 December separately in favour of the accompanies the report makes Joint Meeting with proposal. clear, there is a pressing need to the Edinburgh There has been debate about engage effectively with govern- Mathematical Society this for several years but mem- ment, with external bodies, with Edinburgh [page 7] bers could be forgiven for think- the media and with the public. ing that, despite progress reports A society that represents the 2009 appearing in Mathematics Today broad spectrum of the mathemat- Friday 27 February and the Newsletter, things had ical community and has a larger Mary Cartwright ‘gone quiet’. The process leading membership must inevitably carry Lecture, London up to the present proposal has greater weight. been protracted not because the Your view is important and you 31 March – 4 April two societies disagree with one will soon have an opportunity to LMS Invited Lectures another, which they do not, but take part in this important deci- Edinburgh because those developing the new sion. -
C 2010 KENDALL NICOLE MAURER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
c 2010 KENDALL NICOLE MAURER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED MINIMALLY SIMPLE GROUPS AND BURNSIDE’S THEOREM A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Kendall Nicole Maurer May, 2010 MINIMALLY SIMPLE GROUPS AND BURNSIDE’S THEOREM Kendall Nicole Maurer Thesis Approved: Accepted: Advisor Dean of the College Dr. James P. Cossey Dr. Chand K. Midha Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Jeffrey Riedl Dr. George R. Newkome Faculty Reader Date Dr. Antonio Quesada Department Chair Dr. Joseph Wilder ii ABSTRACT William Burnside’s paqb theorem is a very important result in group theory, which states that any group G of order paqb is solvable. An interesting fact about this the- orem is that it was originally proven using techniques from character theory, another branch of algebra. In fact, it was about seventy years before a group-theoretic proof of Burnside’s theorem was developed through the work of Goldschmidt, Matsuyama, Bender, and other mathematicians. Their approach to proving the theorem was to show that, in essence, minimally simple groups of size paqb do not exist. Our purpose here is to use various techniques from the group-theoretic proof of Burnside’s theorem to establish and prove similar results about minimally simple groups G of arbitrary order. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my wonderful family and friends, especially my mother and father; my sisters, Michelle and Staci; and Grandma Mikey. You always inspire me and give so much of yourselves. -
Math Horizons Math Horizons
"Searching for the 'true tree' for twenty species is like trying to find a needle in very large haystack. Yet biologists are now routinely attempting to build trees with hundreds and sometimes thousands of species." Mathematical Aspects of the'Tree of Life' Charles Semple and Mike Steel University of Canterbury, New Zealand rees have long been used for illustrating certain phe- nomena in nature. They describe the structure of braid- Ted rivers, classify acyclic hydrocarbons in chemistry, and model the growth of cell division in physiology. In evolu- tionary biology, trees describe how species evolved from a common ancestor. Evolutionary trees date back (at least) to Charles Darwin, who made an early sketch of one in a note- book from 1837, more than 20 years before his Origin of Species. In Darwin's day, the main evidence available for reconstructing such trees, apart from some fossils, was mor- phology and physiology- the physical details of different species (does an animal have wings or not, how many petals does a plant have, and so forth). As Darwin wrote in 1872: We possess no pedigrees or amorial bearings; and we have to discover and trace the many diverging lines of descent in our natural genealogies, by characters ofany kind which have long been inherited. A phylogenetic (evolutionary) tree of 42 representative mammals The problem with morphological and fossil data is that they reconstructed using a Bayesian approach by concatenating 12 pro- are patchy, and can be misleading. Also the evolution of mor- tein coding mitochondrial genes. The main mammalian groups are phological characters is often compleX: tind difficult to model.