DOCSLIB.ORG

Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Alba Carballo González for support and encouragement. 1 Table of Contents Sofia Kovalevskaya ................................................................................................................................. 4 Emmy Noether ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Mary Cartwright ................................................................................................................................... 26 Julia Robinson ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Olga Ladyzhenskaya ............................................................................................................................. 46 Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat ....................................................................................................................... 56 Olga Oleinik .......................................................................................................................................... 67 Charlotte Fischer .................................................................................................................................. 77 Karen Uhlenbeck .................................................................................................................................. 87 Krystyna Kuperberg .............................................................................................................................. 98 Nicole Tomczak-Jaegermann ............................................................................................................. 108 Dusa McDuff ....................................................................................................................................... 118 Karen Vogtmann ................................................................................................................................. 128 Carolyn Gordon .................................................................................................................................. 139 Frances Kirwan ................................................................................................................................... 149 Leila Schneps ...................................................................................................................................... 159 Claire Voisin ........................................................................................................................................ 169 Olga Holtz ........................................................................................................................................... 179 Maryam Mirzakhani ........................................................................................................................... 189 Maryna Viazovska .............................................................................................................................. 199 2 Preface In this piece of writing, I make an attempt to briefly discuss the work of twenty female mathematicians. I am aware that in some sections I have gone off on tangents a bit more or not said as much about the actual work which the mathematician does or the exact details of their achievements. In most cases, it would have been difficult to give more than a few details and it is completely impossible to give a good survey of someone’s work within the confines of 10 pages per person along with added context: what I have tried to do is really give a flavour of the kind of things that the person works on and hopefully inspire you to read on further. The difficulty was particularly obvious in algebraic geometry. By the time one has given all the definitions which are needed, one has run out of space and not had the opportunity to actually apply them to some interesting problems, so I had to try my best to give concise, roughly correct definitions whilst also trying to give an idea of the type of problem which can be tackled with the theory, even if there was not space for more specific examples. In some cases I have skipped some of the definitions, trusting that the reader will look them up in the references if unsure. The work does not necessarily represent the people who I think are the twenty greatest female mathematicians of all time and reflects my own interests in mathematics and the things which I felt I might be to talk about semi-competently for a few pages. Given the range of topics and problems covered, there are likely to be errors and conceptual mistakes. Please email me to discuss mistakes and I will be happy to upload a corrected version. Email: [email protected] 3 Sofia Kovalevskaya Kovalevskaya was a nineteenth-century Russian mathematician, known mainly for her achievements in mechanics and the theory of PDEs. She gained qualifications and held a number of posts which were traditionally reserved only for men and was amongst the first women to work as an editor of a scientific journal1. Probably her most substantial mathematical contribution was the Cauchy-Kovalevskaya theorem, which belongs to PDE theory. PDEs (partial differential equations) are equations which model the rate of change of a quantity with respect to two more other quantities which are also changing, whereas ODEs (ordinary differential equations) model the rate of change with respect to one quantity only (usually a time variable). All of science, engineering and applied mathematics depends on differential equations. PDEs were originally brought into being as tools to describe physical phenomena such as wave motion and heat flow (a role which they still play), but over time PDE theory has also developed in another direction into a rich branch of mathematical theory in its own right (without completely losing sight of the physical origin of the equations). A famous and well-studied example is the one-dimensional wave equation: 휕2푓 휕2푓 = 푐2 . 휕푡2 휕푥2 One sees that there are no mixed derivatives in this expression (ie. derivatives with respect to more than one variable), but it should also be pointed out that mixed derivatives can in fact occur in equations which model physical processes: there are versions of the diffusion equation which contain mixed derivative terms, for example. A very interesting development in the twentieth century was the notion that one might be able to ‘weaken’ the notion of a solution to obtain weak solutions which exist where our traditional idea of a solution does not exist: this is rather surprising from the viewpoint of classical PDE theory, since physical intuition would seem to tell us that the notion of a solution has to be a concrete one which cannot be weakened in this way. Essentially, we take a PDE and rewrite it so that it is in ‘weak’ form: a solution to this equation is known as a weak solution to the original PDE. A strong solution is automatically a weak solution, but it is unfortunately not always obvious that a weak solution should also be strong. I should point out that the act of rewriting an equation is not necessarily by itself a profound one. The notion of having an equation or solution with particular types of operator in it and rewriting it so those operators do not appear is fairly common and trivial. 1 Ann Koblitz, A Convergence of Lives: Sofia Kovalevskaya: Scientist, Writer, Revolutionary (New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press, 1993). 4 As an example, one can obtain a fundamental solution to a particular system of equations modelling dilute gas flow, where the solution represents the physical pressure due to a gas: 8훾2Kn푔 푝 = −퐟. ∇휙 + 퐆(∇∇휙) − 2 휇 + 퐆(∇∇휇 ), 15 훾2 훾2 where 퐆 is some arbitrary trace-free symmetric 2-tensor, 휙 is the fundamental solution to the PDE known as Laplace’s equation (derived essentially by considering the symmetries which the solution must have), 휇훾2 is the fundamental solution to the Helmholtz equation (similar to the Laplace equation) and Kn is a dimensionless parameter similar to the Reynolds number2. One notes the repeated appearance of the ∇ operator, known as ‘nabla’ or ‘the gradient’. Using the definition of ∇ as a differential operator, it is a trivial operation to rewrite the pressure term so that it no longer includes nabla: 40 퐫 3 6Kn 푔 1 푝 = 퐟. (− ) + 퐺 푟 푟 ( ) − 푒−훾2푟 4휋|퐫|3 푖푗 푖 푗 4휋|퐫|5 15 4휋|퐫| 푒−훾2푟 (5|퐫| + 3Kn(6Kn + √30|퐫|)) + 퐺 푟 푟 . 푖푗 푖 푗 24Kn2휋|퐫|5 This looks a bit messier, but the differential operator no longer appears and so it might be faster to process the solution with a computer. However, in this case, there is something more powerful going on, since the reformulation we propose allows us to keep a notion of a solution to the equation, even if it cannot be differentiated a sufficient number of times to be counted as a classical solution! At the bottom of things, a variational technique is being employed to find existence of solutions. As the simplest possible example in what is called the ‘elliptic’ theory, one takes a standard second-order elliptic PDE such as the Poisson equation defined for a boundary value problem on a three-dimensional ball 퐵 and then rewrites it as: ∫ −∆푢 ∙ 휙 d푥 = ∫ 푓 ∙ 휙 d푥, 퐵 퐵 where 휙 belongs to 퐶∞(퐵) and 푢 solves the original PDE. The fact that this reformulation is equivalent to the PDE we had before is due to what is known as the fundamental lemma of calculus of variations. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of the American Mathematical Society August 2017 Volume 64, Number 7
    ISSN 0002-9920 (print) ISSN 1088-9477 (online) of the American Mathematical Society August 2017 Volume 64, Number 7 The Mathematics of Gravitational Waves: A Two-Part Feature page 684 The Travel Ban: Affected Mathematicians Tell Their Stories page 678 The Global Math Project: Uplifting Mathematics for All page 712 2015–2016 Doctoral Degrees Conferred page 727 Gravitational waves are produced by black holes spiraling inward (see page 674). American Mathematical Society LEARNING ® MEDIA MATHSCINET ONLINE RESOURCES MATHEMATICS WASHINGTON, DC CONFERENCES MATHEMATICAL INCLUSION REVIEWS STUDENTS MENTORING PROFESSION GRAD PUBLISHING STUDENTS OUTREACH TOOLS EMPLOYMENT MATH VISUALIZATIONS EXCLUSION TEACHING CAREERS MATH STEM ART REVIEWS MEETINGS FUNDING WORKSHOPS BOOKS EDUCATION MATH ADVOCACY NETWORKING DIVERSITY blogs.ams.org Notices of the American Mathematical Society August 2017 FEATURED 684684 718 26 678 Gravitational Waves The Graduate Student The Travel Ban: Affected Introduction Section Mathematicians Tell Their by Christina Sormani Karen E. Smith Interview Stories How the Green Light was Given for by Laure Flapan Gravitational Wave Research by Alexander Diaz-Lopez, Allyn by C. Denson Hill and Paweł Nurowski WHAT IS...a CR Submanifold? Jackson, and Stephen Kennedy by Phillip S. Harrington and Andrew Gravitational Waves and Their Raich Mathematics by Lydia Bieri, David Garfinkle, and Nicolás Yunes This season of the Perseid meteor shower August 12 and the third sighting in June make our cover feature on the discovery of gravitational waves
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Uhlenbeck Awarded the 2019 Abel Prize
    RESEARCH NEWS Karen Uhlenbeck While she was in Urbana-Champagne (Uni- versity of Illinois), Karen Uhlenbeck worked Awarded the 2019 Abel with a postdoctoral fellow, Jonathan Sacks, Prize∗ on singularities of harmonic maps on 2D sur- faces. This was the beginning of a long journey in geometric analysis. In gauge the- Rukmini Dey ory, Uhlenbeck, in her remarkable ‘removable singularity theorem’, proved the existence of smooth local solutions to Yang–Mills equa- tions. The Fields medallist Simon Donaldson was very much influenced by her work. Sem- inal results of Donaldson and Uhlenbeck–Yau (amongst others) helped in establishing gauge theory on a firm mathematical footing. Uhlen- beck’s work with Terng on integrable systems is also very influential in the field. Karen Uhlenbeck is a professor emeritus of mathematics at the University of Texas at Austin, where she holds Sid W. Richardson Foundation Chair (since 1988). She is cur- Karen Uhlenbeck (Source: Wikimedia) rently a visiting associate at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton and a visiting se- nior research scholar at Princeton University. The 2019 Abel prize for lifetime achievements She has enthused many young women to take in mathematics was awarded for the first time up mathematics and runs a mentorship pro- to a woman mathematician, Professor Karen gram for women in mathematics at Princeton. Uhlenbeck. She is famous for her work in ge- Karen loves gardening and nature hikes. Hav- ometry, analysis and gauge theory. She has ing known her personally, I found she is one of proved very important (and hard) theorems in the most kind-hearted mathematicians I have analysis and applied them to geometry and ever known.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothers in Science
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.03981V1 [Math.FA] 8 Jul 2020
    FOURIER UNIQUENESS IN R4 ANDREW BAKAN, HAAKAN HEDENMALM, ALFONSO MONTES-RODRÍGUEZ, DANYLO RADCHENKO, AND MARYNA VIAZOVSKA Abstract. We show an interrelation between the uniqueness aspect of the recent Fourier interpolation formula of Radchenko and Viazovska and the Heisenberg uniqueness for the Klein-Gordon equation and the lattice- cross of critical density, studied by Hedenmalm and Montes-Rodríguez. This has been known since 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1. Basic notation in the plane. We write Z for the integers, Z+ for the positive integers, R for the real line, and C for the complex plane. We write H for the upper half-plane {τ ∈ C : Im τ> 0}. Moreover, we d let h·, ·id denote the Euclidean inner product of R . 1.2. The Fourier transform of radial functions. For a function f ∈ L1(Rd), we consider its Fourier transform (with x = (x1,..., xd) and y = (y1,..., yd)) −i2πhx,yid fˆ(y):= e f (x)dvold(x), dvold(x):= dx1 ··· dxd. ZRd If f is radial, then fˆis radial too. A particular example of a radial function is the Gaussian iπτ|x|2 (1.2.1) Gτ(x):= e , which decays nicely provided that Im τ> 0, that is, when τ ∈ H. The Fourier transform of a Gaussian is another Gaussian, in this case −d/2 −d/2 τ −iπ|y|2/τ τ (1.2.2) Gˆ τ(y):= e = G−1/τ(y), i i Here, it is important that τ 7→ −1/τ preserves hyperbolic space H. In the sense of distribution theory, the above relationship extends to boundary points τ ∈ R as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Magdalena Czubak 2008 the Dissertation Committee for Magdalena Czubak Certifies That This Is the Approved Version of the Following Dissertation
    Copyright by Magdalena Czubak 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Magdalena Czubak certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Well-posedness for the space-time Monopole Equation and Ward Wave Map. Committee: Karen Uhlenbeck, Supervisor William Beckner Daniel Knopf Andrea Nahmod Mikhail M. Vishik Well-posedness for the space-time Monopole Equation and Ward Wave Map. by Magdalena Czubak, B.S. DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN May 2008 Dla mojej Mamy. Well-posedness for the space-time Monopole Equation and Ward Wave Map. Publication No. Magdalena Czubak, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2008 Supervisor: Karen Uhlenbeck We study local well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for two geometric wave equations that can be derived from Anti-Self-Dual Yang Mills equations on R2+2. These are the space-time Monopole Equation and the Ward Wave Map. The equations can be formulated in different ways. For the formulations we use, we establish local well-posedness results, which are sharp using the iteration methods. v Table of Contents Abstract v Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Space-time Monopole and Ward Wave Map equations . 1 1.2 Chapter Summaries . 7 Chapter 2. Preliminaries 9 2.1 Notation . 9 2.2 Function Spaces & Inversion of the Wave Operator . 10 2.3 Estimates Used . 12 2.4 Classical Results . 16 2.5 Null Forms . 18 2.5.1 Symbols .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 X.Pdf
    CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF THE GOVERNING EQUATIONS 4.1 INTRODUCTION The mathematical nature of the systems of governing equations deduced in Chapters 2 and 3 is investigated in this chapter. The systems of PDEs that express the quasi-equilibrium approximation are studied in greater depth. The analysis is especially important for the systems whose solutions are likely to feature discontinuities, as a result of strong gradients growing steeper, or because the initial data is already discontinuous. The geomorphic shallow-water flows, such as the dam-break flow considered in Chapter 3, are the paradigmatic example of flows for which discontinuities arise fundamentally because of the initial conditions. Laboratory experiments show that, in the first instants of a sudden collapse of a dam, vertical accelerations are strong and a bore is formed, either through the breaking of a wave (Stansby et al. 1998) or due to the incorporation of bed material (Capart 2000, Leal et al. 2002). Intense erosion occurs in the vicinity of the dam and a highly saturated wave front is likely to form at ttt≡≈0 4 , thg00= , where h0 is the initial water depth in the reservoir. The saturated wave front can be seen forming in figure 3.1(a). Unlike the debris flow resulting from avalanches or lahars, the saturated front is followed by a sheet-flow similar to that 303 encountered in surf or swash zones (Asano 1995), as seen in figures 3.2(b) and (c). The intensity of the sediment transport decreases in the upstream direction as the flow velocities approach fluvial values.
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Keskulla Uhlenbeck
    2019 The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters has decided to award the Abel Prize for 2019 to Karen Keskulla Uhlenbeck University of Texas at Austin “for her pioneering achievements in geometric partial differential equations, gauge theory and integrable systems, and for the fundamental impact of her work on analysis, geometry and mathematical physics.” Karen Keskulla Uhlenbeck is a founder of modern by earlier work of Morse, guarantees existence of Geometric Analysis. Her perspective has permeated minimisers of geometric functionals and is successful the field and led to some of the most dramatic in the case of 1-dimensional domains, such as advances in mathematics in the last 40 years. closed geodesics. Geometric analysis is a field of mathematics where Uhlenbeck realised that the condition of Palais— techniques of analysis and differential equations are Smale fails in the case of surfaces due to topological interwoven with the study of geometrical and reasons. The papers of Uhlenbeck, co-authored with topological problems. Specifically, one studies Sacks, on the energy functional for maps of surfaces objects such as curves, surfaces, connections and into a Riemannian manifold, have been extremely fields which are critical points of functionals influential and describe in detail what happens when representing geometric quantities such as energy the Palais-Smale condition is violated. A minimising and volume. For example, minimal surfaces are sequence of mappings converges outside a finite set critical points of the area and harmonic maps are of singular points and by using rescaling arguments, critical points of the Dirichlet energy. Uhlenbeck’s they describe the behaviour near the singularities major contributions include foundational results on as bubbles or instantons, which are the standard minimal surfaces and harmonic maps, Yang-Mills solutions of the minimising map from the 2-sphere to theory, and integrable systems.
    [Show full text]
  • LMS – EPSRC Durham Symposium
    LMS – EPSRC Durham Symposium Anthony Byrne Grants and Membership Administrator 12th July 2016, Durham The work of the LMS for mathematics The charitable aims of the Society: Funding the advancement of mathematical knowledge Encouraging mathematical research and collaboration ’, George Legendre Celebrating mathematical 30 Pieces achievements Publishing and disseminating mathematical knowledge Advancing and promoting mathematics The attendees of the Young Researchers in Mathematics Conference 2015, held at Oxford Historical Moments of the London Mathematical Society 1865 Foundation of LMS at University College London George Campbell De Morgan organised the first meeting, and his father, Augustus De Morgan became the 1st President 1865 First minute book list of the 27 original members 1866 LMS moves to Old Burlington House, Piccadilly J.J. Sylvester, 2nd President of the Society. 1866 Julius Plûcker Thomas Hirst Plûcker Collection of boxwood models of quartic surfaces given to Thomas Archer Hirst, Vice- President of LMS, and donated to the Society 1870 Move to Asiatic Society, 22 Albemarle Street William Spottiswoode, President 1874 Donation of £1,000 from John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh) Generous donation enabled the Society to publish volumes of the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. J.W. Strutt (Lord Rayleigh), LMS President 1876-78 1881 First women members Charlotte Angas Scott and Christine Ladd 1884 First De Morgan medal awarded to Arthur Cayley 1885 Sophie Bryant First woman to have a paper published in LMS Proceedings 1916 Return to Burlington House the home of LMS until 1998 1937 ACE ’s Automatic Turing LMS Proceedings, 1937 Computing Engine, published Alan Turing’s first paper 1950 On Computable Numbers 1947 Death of G.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Ceremony
    Opening ceremony Sir John Ball, President of the International Mathematical Union Your Majesty, Señor Ruiz Gallardón, Señora Cabrera, Señora Aguirre, Professor Manuel de León, Distinguished guests, Ladies and gentlemen, ¡Bienvenidos al ICM dos mil seis! Welcome to ICM 2006, the 25th International Congress of Mathematicians, and the first ICM to be held in Spain. We offer our heartfelt thanks to the Spanish nation, so rich in history and culture, for its invitation to Madrid. We greatly appreciate that His Majesty King Juan Carlos is honouring mathematics by His presence here today. While celebrating this feast of mathematics, with the many talking-points that it will provide, it is worth reflecting on the ways in which our community functions. Mathematics is a profession of high standards and integrity. We freely discuss our work with others without fear of it being stolen, and research is communicated openly prior to formal publication. Editorial procedures are fair and proper, and work gains its reputation through merit and not by how it is promoted. These are the norms operated by the vast majority of mathematicians. The exceptions are rare, and they are noticed. Mathematics has a strong record of service, freely given. We see this in the time and care spent in the refereeing of papers and other forms of peer review. We see it in the running of mathematical societies and journals, in the provision of free mathematical software and teaching resources, and in the various projects world-wide to improve electronic access to the mathematical literature, old and new. We see it in the nurturing of students beyond the call of duty.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryna Viazovska (HU Berlin)
    s well as BMS Friday Colloquium Friday 4 November 2016 at 14:15 Tea & Cookies starting at 13:00 BMS Loft, Urania, An der Urania 17, 10787 Berlin Maryna Viazovska (HU Berlin) Solving packing problems by linear programming How much of Euclidean space can be filled with pairwise non-over- lapping congruent copies of a given convex body K? We call this the body packing problem. Problems of this kind are solved comple- tely only in rare cases. One powerful method to attack these geome- tric questions is linear programming. This approach was developed by Philippe Delsarte in the early seventies. Based on inequalities for © Maryna Viazovska the distance distribution of point configurations, this method was successfully applied to the “kissing number problem“ in dimensions 8 and 24. The original Delsarte method was applied to the optimization on compact spaces. In 2003, Cohn and Elkies generalized this method to Euclidean space. In particular, they improved existent upper bounds for the maximum density of sphere packings in dimensions 4,...,36. Recently, Viazovska and her coauthors proved that linear pro- gramming provides tight bounds for sphere packing in dimensions 8 and 24. In her talk, Viazovska will explain the linear programming method and demonstrate how it works on various examples. Born in the Ukraine, Maryna Viazovska completed her PhD at MPIM in Bonn in 2013 under the supervision of Don Zagier. Her research interests include number theory and discrete geometry. In October 2013, she became a visiting researcher at the IHÉS in France. In August 2014, she took up the two-year position of BMS Dirichlet Postdoctoral Fellow based at HU Berlin, during which time she solved the hyper- sphere packing problem for dimension 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing the History of Dynamical Systems and Chaos
    Historia Mathematica 29 (2002), 273–339 doi:10.1006/hmat.2002.2351 Writing the History of Dynamical Systems and Chaos: View metadata, citation and similar papersLongue at core.ac.uk Dur´ee and Revolution, Disciplines and Cultures1 brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector David Aubin Max-Planck Institut fur¨ Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin, Germany E-mail: [email protected] and Amy Dahan Dalmedico Centre national de la recherche scientifique and Centre Alexandre-Koyre,´ Paris, France E-mail: [email protected] Between the late 1960s and the beginning of the 1980s, the wide recognition that simple dynamical laws could give rise to complex behaviors was sometimes hailed as a true scientific revolution impacting several disciplines, for which a striking label was coined—“chaos.” Mathematicians quickly pointed out that the purported revolution was relying on the abstract theory of dynamical systems founded in the late 19th century by Henri Poincar´e who had already reached a similar conclusion. In this paper, we flesh out the historiographical tensions arising from these confrontations: longue-duree´ history and revolution; abstract mathematics and the use of mathematical techniques in various other domains. After reviewing the historiography of dynamical systems theory from Poincar´e to the 1960s, we highlight the pioneering work of a few individuals (Steve Smale, Edward Lorenz, David Ruelle). We then go on to discuss the nature of the chaos phenomenon, which, we argue, was a conceptual reconfiguration as
    [Show full text]
  • Alwyn C. Scott
    the frontiers collection the frontiers collection Series Editors: A.C. Elitzur M.P. Silverman J. Tuszynski R. Vaas H.D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active scientists in all areas to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, consciousness and complex systems – the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. Other Recent Titles The Thermodynamic Machinery of Life By M. Kurzynski The Emerging Physics of Consciousness Edited by J. A. Tuszynski Weak Links Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks By P. Csermely Quantum Mechanics at the Crossroads New Perspectives from History, Philosophy and Physics Edited by J. Evans, A.S. Thorndike Particle Metaphysics A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality By B. Falkenburg The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time By H.D. Zeh Asymmetry: The Foundation of Information By S.J. Muller Mindful Universe Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer By H. Stapp Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition By M. Schlosshauer For a complete list of titles in The Frontiers Collection, see back of book Alwyn C.
    [Show full text]