DOCSLIB.ORG

Architectural Review Committee From: Matthew

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Architectural Review Committee From: Matthew MEMORANDUM TO: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE FROM: MATTHEW DOWNING, PLANNING MANAGER SUBJECT: REVIEW OF LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, AND ARCHITECTURE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 18-001 DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2018 SUMMARY OF ACTION: A recommendation to the Community Development Director on final landscape, lighting details, and architecture will allow for issuance of a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit approved by Conditional Use Permit 18-001. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) review the final landscaping, lighting, and architecture for the approved conditional use permits and make a recommendation to the Community Development Director. DISCUSSION: The City Council approved Conditional Use Permit 18-001 on June 12, 2018. In accordance with Condition of Approval #66, final landscape, lighting, and architecture are required to be reviewed by the ARC prior to building permit issuance. Attachment: 1. Project plans $77$&+0(17 AKALIN: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ARROYO GRANDE, CA FIRE NOTES SHEET INDEX LOCATION STAMP - FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION IN WILDLAND URBAN TITLE/CODE INTERFACE AREAS. T1.0 TITLE SHEET T1.1 TITLE 24 A) A MINIMUM 100'-0" FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE IS REQUIRED CONTRACTOR T1.2 CAL GREEN MEASURES AROUND ALL STRUCTURES. IF 100'-0" FUEL MODIFICATION CANNOT BE PROVIDED AROUND PERIMETER OF ALL T1.3 GREEN CHECKLIST / RESIDENTIAL MEASU... STRUCTURES, ENHANCED REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. FUEL T2.0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MODIFICATION ZONE IS NOT ALLOWED TO CROSS PROPERTY CIVIL LINES OR ENCROACH INTO OPEN SPACE EASEMENTS IF LOT IS WALSHENGINEERING.NET (805) 319–4948 979 OSOS ST, SUITE F-4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 TOO SMALL FOR 100'-0" FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE, THEN CIVIL NOTE ON PLOT PLAN THAT ENTIRE LOT IS FUEL MODIFIED. C1.0 CIVIL NOTES B) IN ROOF COVERING WHERE THE PROFILE ALLOWS A SPACE C2.0 GRADING & DRAINAGE BETWEEN THE ROOF COVERING AND ROOF DECKING, THE C3.0 UTILITIES SPACES AT THE EAVE ENDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO C4.0 SECTIONS & DETAILS STRUCTURAL PREVENT THE INTRUSION OF FLAMES AND EMBERS, BE FIRE- C4.1 SECTION & DETAILS STOPPED WITH APPROVED MATERIALS (E.G., NON- GENERAL NOTES PROJECT DIRECTORY PROJECT DATA EC1.0 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN COMBUSTIBLE BIRDSTOP FOR CURVED TILE), OR HAVE ONE EC2.0 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS LAYER OF NO 72 ASTM CAP SHEET INSTALLED OVER THE COMBUSTIBLE DECKING. ARCHITECTURAL 1 - ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO: A.P.N.: 007-761-021 MECHANICAL OWNER: ARCHITECT: C) EXPOSED VALLEY FLASHINGS SHALL BE AT LEAST NO. 26- ISAMAN DESIGN, INC. A1.0 SITE PLAN (A) THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GAUGE CORROSION-RESISTANT METAL INSTALLED OVER A MURAT & NANCY AKALIN 2420 BROAD STREET A1.1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN CODE AND ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS WHICH HAVE BEEN NEW 2 BEDROOM 2 BATH ADU WITH ATTACHED 2-CAR MINIMUM 36"-WIDE UNDERLAYMENT CONSISTING OF ONE LAYER 1212 FLORA ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 A2.0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES. GARAGE WITH A NEW ADDRESS OF 1210 FLORA ROAD. OF NO. 72 ASTM CAP SHEET RUNNING THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ARROYO GRANDE, CA CONTACT: BILL ISAMAN A3.0 FIRST FLOOR R.C.P. VALLEY. LANDSCAPE (B) ALL REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF ALL SITE STATISTICS: A4.0 ROOF PLAN PHONE: (760) 914-3232 PHONE: (805) 544-5672 LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES. PROJECT ADDRESS: A5.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS D) ROOF GUTTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH THE MEANS TO EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: (805) 544-5642 A5.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PREVENT THE ACCUMULATION OF LEAVES AND DEBRIS. EMAIL: [email protected] (C) ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY ALL 1210 / 1212 FLORA RD A6.0 SECTIONS LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES. ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420 E) ALL VENTS (ROOF, FOUNDATION, COMBUSTION-AIR, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: A6.1 SECTIONS SHALL RESIST THE INTRUSION OF FLAMES AND EMBERS OR NAME ASHLEY & VANCE A6.2 SECTIONS LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES. ZONING: SHALL BE SCREENED WITH CORROSION-RESISTANT, NON- ADDRESS 1413 MONTEREY STREET A7.0 FIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN -CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE2016 LOT AREA: ( 221,284.8SF) 5.08 ACRES COMBUSTIBLE WIRE MESH. THE SIZE OF THE OPENINGS IN THE ADDRESS CONTACT: NAME A7.1 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS -CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE2016 BUILDABLE AREA: 3.55 ACRES MESH SHALL BE A MIN. OF 1/16" AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/8". CONTACT: -CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE2016 PROPOSED FOOTPRINT (ALL STRUCT): 8,381 SF A8.0 DOOR SCHEDULE TURBINE ATTIC VENTS SHALL BE EQUIPPED TO ALLOW PHONE: (805) 545-0010 -CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE2016 LOT COVERAGE (ALL STRUCTURES): 4 % A8.1 WINDOW SCHEDULE ROTATION IN ONLY ONE DIRECTION. PHONE: (805) FAX: (805) XXX-XXXX -CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE2016 A9.0 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS -CAL GREEN BLDG STANDARDS CODE2016 EMAIL: EMAIL: [email protected] F) VENTS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN EAVES, EAVE -CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): OVERHANGS, SOFFITS, OR CORNICES. GABLE-END VENTS WILL TITLE 24 / THIRD PARTY VERIF: SOILS ENGINEER: FOR COUNTY STAMP -CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY AND ACCESSIBILITY PARCEL'S OVER 12,000 SF = NO FAR MAX BE ALLOWED IF THE VENTS ARE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 12" CARSTAIRS ENERGY PACIFIC COAST TESTING STRUCTURAL STANDARDS - EXISTING LIVING +/- 5000 SF BELOW THE LOWEST EAVE/RAKE PROJECTIONS. PO BOX 4736 440 HIGH STREET - EXISTING SHED +/- 550 SF S-1.1 STRUCTURAL TITLE SHEET 2 - ALL WORK DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE VERIFIED SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 G) EAVES, SOFFITS, AND FASCIAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS - NEW LIVING 1784 SF S-1.2 STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS ) FOR DIMENSION, GRADE, EXTENT AND COMPATIBILITY WITH CONTACT: TIMOTHY CARSTAIRS CONTACT: RICK ARMERO REQUIRED IN GUIDANCE DOCUMENT DPLU #198. - GARAGE 608 S-2.1 FOUNDATION PLAN EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. ANY DISCREPANCIES AND - ROOFED PORCH 217 S-2.2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN UNEXPECTED CONDITIONS THAT AFFECT OR CHANGE THE WORK PHONE: (805) 904-9048 PHONE: (805) 543-8539 H) EXTERIOR WINDOWS, WINDOW WALLS, GLAZED DOORS, AND - ROOFED PORCH 222 DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE BROUGHT EMAIL: timmycarstairs.yahoo.com EMAIL: [email protected] S-3.1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS GLAZED OPENINGS WITHIN DOORS SHALL BE DUAL-GLAZED TOTAL COVERAGE 8381 SF OR 4% TO THE OWNER'S ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY. DO NOT PROCEED S-3.2 STRUCTURAL DETAILS ADU UNITS WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE OR SHALL BE MECHANICAL ENGINEER: ( WITH THE WORK IN THE AREA OF DISCREPANCEIS UNTIL ALL SUCH BUILDING STATISTICS: GLASS BLOCK UNITS OR SHALL HAVE A FIRE-RESISTANCE BRUMMEL MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (BME) DISCREPANCIES ARE RESOLVED. IF THE CONTRACTOR GUEST HOUSE (CONDITIONED): 1,784 SF RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 20 MINUTES. GLAZING FRAMES 444 HIGUERA STREET CHOOSES TO DO SO, HE/SHE SHALL BE PROCEEDING AT HIS/HER MECHANICAL / PLUMBING MADE OF VINYL SHALL HAVE WELDED CORNERS AND METAL SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 OWN RISK. TOTAL CONDITIONED: 1,784 SF REINFORCEMENT IN THE INTERLOCK AREA. PROVIDE NOTE ON CONTACT: KEITH BRUMMEL M1.0 MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION SHEET AND WINDOW SCHEDULE. SPECIFY FRAME 3 - DIMENSIONS SHOWN SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER P1.0 PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN MATERIAL AND AN APPROVED MANUFACTURER OR PROVIDE A GARAGE 2-CAR (UNCONDITIONED) 608 SF DRAWING SCALE OR PROPORTION. LARGER SCALE DRAWINGS PHONE: (805) 543-6636 MANUFACTURERS' INFO DOCUMENTING COMPLIANCE. COVERED DECKS: 439 SF SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. EMAIL: [email protected] ACCESSORY I) EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE OF APPROVED NON- OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3 ELECTRICAL : 4 - ALL DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON THE PLANS ARE TO BE FIELD COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION OR OF SOLID-CORE WOOD NOT CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-B VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. E1.0 FIRST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN LESS THAN 1 3/8" THICK OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED. NUMBER OF STORIES: 1 FIRE SPRINKLERS REQ'D: YES 5 - CONTRACTOR IS TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING FAMILIAR TITLE SHEET J) PROJECTIONS SUCH AS DECKS, CARPORTS, BALCONIES, DEFERRED SUBMITTAL WITH THESE DOCUMENTS INCLUDING ALL CONTRACT 1210 FLORA ROAD PATIO COVERS, TRELLISES, ETC., SHALL BE OF NON- REQUIREMENTS. COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL OR ONE-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE MATERIAL OR APPROVED EXTERIOR FIRE-RETARDANT AGENCIES & UTILITIES VICINITY MAP 6 - MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS TO BE DESIGN-BUILD. DWELLING UNIT TREATED WOOD OR MODIFIED HEAVY-TIMBER CONSTUCTION AKALIN CONSISTING OF ROOF FRAMING WITH MINIMUM 2X T&G DECKING, ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420 7 - ALL GAS LINES TO BE PROBERLY SIZED AND SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE: PG & E: 4X6 RAFTERS, 6X6 COLUMNS/POSTS AND/OR FLOOR COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DPT 406 HIGUERA STREET FRAMING WITH MINIMUM 3X DECKING 4X10 OR 6X8 BEAMS, 4X8 300 EAST BRANCH STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401 JOISTS, 6X6 COLUMNS/POSTS. 8 - PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED WITH THE ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420 PROJECT SITE No.Revision Date 1212 FLORA ROAD INSPECTOR. CALL MIKE STOKER (805) 781-1543 PHONE: (800) 743-5000 ARROYO GRANDE, CA K) PAPER-FACED INSULATION IS PROHIBITED IN ATTICS OR PHONE: (805) 473-5450 FAX: OTHER VENTILATED SPACES. 1 1ST SUBMITTAL 08/17/18 9 - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT FAX: (805) 473-5458 EMAIL: PRACTICES MUST BE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONAL PRIOR TO FIRST EMAIL: L) ANY PORTION OF A FENCE OR OTHER STRUCTURE WITHIN INSPECTION. NO INSPECTIONS CAN BE PERFORMED IF THEY ARE FIVE FEET OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF NON- 2 2ND SUBMITTAL 11/09/18 NOT IN PLACE OR HAVE FAILED TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL. FLORA RD COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL OR APPROVED EXTERIOR FIRE- E BRANCH ST FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL WILL CAUSE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RETARDANT WOOD OR MATERIAL THAT MEETS THE SAME INSPECTIONS TO BE DELAYED UNTIL EROSION CONTROL FIVE CITIES FIRE AUTHORITY PUBLIC WORKS FIRE-RESISTIVE STANDARDS AS THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF THE MEASURES ARE FUNCTIONAL.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EXHIBIT B CPC Report N 190230 ZRY (Residential Tower
    EXHIBIT B CPC Report N 190230 ZRY (Residential Tower Mechanical Voids) CITY PLANNING COMMISSION April 10, 2019, Calendar No. 11 N 190230 ZRY IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by the Department of City Planning pursuant to Section 201 of the New York City Charter for an amendment of Article II, Chapter 3 and related provisions of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York, modifying residential tower regulations to require certain mechanical spaces to be calculated as residential floor area. _____________________________________________________________________________ This application (N 190230 ZRY) for a zoning text amendment was filed by the Department of City Planning (DCP) on January 25, 2019 to discourage the use of excessively tall mechanical floors in high-density residential tower districts. The proposal would require that mechanical floors, typically excluded from zoning floor area calculations, would be counted toward the overall permitted floor area on the zoning lot if they are taller than new specified limits or overly concentrated in portions of the building. The proposed floor area requirements would apply to residential towers in non-contextual R9 and R10 Residence Districts and their equivalent Commercial Districts, as well as Special Purpose Districts that rely on underlying floor area and height and setback regulations or that are primarily residential in character. The provision would also apply to non-residential portions of a mixed-use building if the building contains a limited amount of non-residential floor area. BACKGROUND The New York City Zoning Resolution allows floor space containing mechanical equipment to be excluded from zoning floor area calculations, reflecting the recognition that these spaces perform important and necessary functions within buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope of Services Template
    November 2018 SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR FINANCIAL PROJECT ID(S). To Be Determined by Task Work Order Continuing Services Existing Roadway Condition Assessment Report (ERCAR) Development District-Wide Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise 1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 6 3 PROJECT COMMON AND PROJECT GENERAL TASKS....................................... 34 4 ROADWAY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 44 5 ROADWAY PLANS .......................................................................................................... 51 6A DRAINAGE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 52 6B DRAINAGE PLANS .......................................................................................................... 56 7 UTILITIES .......................................................................................................................... 57 8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS, COMPLIANCE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES .................................................................................................................. 61 9 STRUCTURES - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS TASKS AND DRAWINGS .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Efficiency in Multi-Use Tall Building
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Space Efficiency in Multi-Use Tall Building Authors: Mahjoub Elnimeiri, Research Associate, Illinois Institute of Technology Hyeong-Ill Kim, Professor, Illinois Institute of Technology Subject: Architectural/Design Keywords: Design Process Mixed-Use Planning Publication Date: 2004 Original Publication: CTBUH 2004 Seoul Conference Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Mahjoub Elnimeiri; Hyeong-Ill Kim Space Efficiency in Multi-Use Tall Building Hyeong-ill Kim1, Mahjoub Elnimeiri2, 1 Research Associate, College of Architecture, Illinois Institute of Technology 2Professor, College of Architecture, Illinois Institute of Technology Abstract This paper seeks to make a contribution to the development of the design strategies for multi-use tall buildings in relation to space efficiency of the building for architects, engineers and developers during their early phases of the design process. This research describes the complex challenges of a design development process influenced by vertically stacked functions. This paper addresses the important parameters in the design of multi-use tall buildings and their relationship to the space efficiency. Parameters including functions, lease span, floor-to-floor height, vertical transportation, site area, FAR(Floor Area Ratio), building height, number of floors, building size at the base and top, , aspect ratio, structural system were analyzed. Ten multi-use buildings were carefully surveyed and investigated through specific case studies. To achieve this comparative analysis, a comprehensive data base was established. Based on the results of the case studies, a set of quantitative analysis was performed to show relationship among design factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Family Dwelling Addition Handout 3-19
    HUMBOLDT COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT 25 W. FOURTH STREET WINNEMUCCA, NV 89446 (775) 623-6322 (775) 623-6337 – FAX hcnv.us (web site) [email protected] (e-mail) CITY OF WINNEMUCCA BUILDING DEPARTMENT 90 W. FOURTH STREET WINNEMUCCA, NV 89445 (775) 623-6319 (775) 623-6321 - FAX RESIDENTIAL ADDITION PERMIT GUIDE March 2019 GENERAL INFORMATION This guide outlines the requirements for obtaining a building permit to construct a residential addition in Humboldt County. In order to ensure that your application is processed in a timely manner, your submittal package must be complete. Once submitted, your plan package will require review and approval from the following County and State Agencies: Zoning Approval Humboldt County Planning & Zoning Department (Site Plan/Zoning Codes) 623-6393 Street Excavation Humboldt County Road Department 623-6416 Excavation permits are available from the Road Department for any excavation in a county road easement or right of Way Plan Review Humboldt County Building Department Flood Zone Area Review Humboldt County Building Department Water/Domestic Well Installation Shall be approved by Nevada State Water Resources (775) 684-2800 Nevada State Manufactured Housing Division (702) 486 – 4138 - Las Vegas Upon submitting your plans to the Building Department and prior to final inspection, the applicant will need to contact the Bureau of Health Protection Services for septic approval. Written approval shall be submitted to this office. Approval from water district or sewer districts is also required. We recommend you
    [Show full text]
  • Elevator Pressurization in Tall Buildings 2. Journal Paper Ctbuh
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Elevator Pressurization in Tall Buildings Author: John H. Klote, Smoke and Fire Consulting Subjects: Fire & Safety Vertical Transportation Keywords: Fire Safety Vertical Transportation Publication Date: 2013 Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 2 Number 4 Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / John H. Klote International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of December 2013, Vol 2, No 4, 341-344 High-Rise Buildings www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php Elevator Pressurization in Tall Buildings John H. Klote† Smoke and Fire Consulting, 19355 Cypress Ridge Terrace, Leesburg, VA 20176, USA Abstract During a building fire, smoke can flow through elevator shafts threatening life on floors remote from the fire. Many buildings have pressurized elevators intended to prevent such smoke flow. The computer program, CONTAM, can be used to analyze the performance of pressurization smoke control systems. The design of pressurized elevators can be challenging for the following reasons: (1) often the building envelope is not capable of effectively handling the large airflow resulting from elevator pressurization, (2) open elevator doors on the ground floor tend to increase the flow from the elevator shaft at the ground floor, and (3) open exterior doors on the ground floor can cause excessive pressure differences across the elevator shaft at the ground floor. To meet these challenges, the following systems have been developed: (1) exterior vent (EV) system, (2) floor exhaust (FE) system, and ground floor lobby (GFL) system.
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Center, Thompson Center Name of Multiple Property Listing N/A (Enter "N/A" If Property Is Not Part of a Multiple Property Listing)
    NPS Form 10900 OMB No. 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name State of Illinois Center other names/site number James R. Thompson Center, Thompson Center Name of Multiple Property Listing N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) 2. Location street & number 100 West Randolph Street not for publication city or town Chicago vicinity state Illinois county Cook zip code 60601 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official/Title: Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Date Illinois Department of Natural Resources - SHPO State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Schematic Design Narrative
    Valdez Middle School Project Project No.: 11‐310‐9507 City of Valdez Schematic Design Narrative June 27, 2012 ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, INTERIOR DESIGNERS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Valdez Middle School Schematic Design Submittal TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 2 Overview 3 Code Summary 5 Environmental Design Narrative 7 Geotechnical Narrative 8 Landscape Design Narrative 12 Civil Design Narrative 16 Architectural Narrative 19 Structural Design Narrative 21 Mechanical Design Narrative 22 Electrical Design Narrative 29 Appendix A: “Valdez Middle School Site Pre‐Demolition Hazardous Building Materials & Environmental Assessment” BETTISWORTH NORTH ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS 212 FRONT ST FAIRBANKS AK 99701 907 456 5780 1 Valdez Middle School Schematic Design Submittal ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Client City of Valdez P.O. Box 307, Valdez, AK 99686 John Hozey, City Manager Jack McCay, Project Manager Valdez City School District P.O. Box 398, Valdez, AK 99686 Jacob Jensen, Superintendent Rod Morrison, Junior High Principal Consultant Team Bettisworth North Architects and Planners (Architect/Landscape Architect) 212 Front Street, Fairbanks, AK 99701 Charles Bettisworth, Principal in Charge Tracy Vanairsdale, Principal, Project Manager Mark Kimerer, Project Landscape Architect DeJong‐Richter (Educational Specifications) 4945 Badenton Blvd., Suite B, Dublin, OH 43017 Bill DeJong, Principal Tracy Richter, Principal CRW Engineering Group, LLC (Civil) 3940 Arctic Blvd., #300, Anchorage, AK 99503 Pete Bellezza, Principal Civil Engineer BBFM Engineers Inc. (Structural) 510 L Street, Suite 200, Anchorage, AK 99501 Forrest T. Braun, Principal Structural Engineer RSA Engineering, Inc. (Mechanical/Electrical) 2522 Arctic Blvd., Anchorage, AK 99503 Brian Pekar, Senior Mechanical Engineer Channing Lillo, Associate Principal Electrical Engineer Shannon & Wilson, Inc. (Geotechnical) 2355 Hill Road, Fairbanks, AK 99709 Steve Adamczak, Principal Geotechnical Engineer NORTECH, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Noma-Offering-Plan Part3.Pdf
    210 211 EXHIBIT "4" DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 212 213 50 West 30th Street 50 West 30th Street, New York, NY ARCHITECT'S DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND SPECIFICATIONS 23 November 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE A. Location of Property ...........................................................................................................................2 B. Status of Construction .......................................................................................................................2 C. Site .............................................................................................................................................................2 D. Utilities ......................................................................................................................................................3 E. Sub-Surface Conditions .....................................................................................................................4 F. Streetscape & Enclosure ...................................................................................................................4 G. Building Size ...........................................................................................................................................4 H. Building Systems ..................................................................................................................................5 (1) Foundation ..................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Land Uses and Densities
    APPENDIX C PERMITTED LAND USES AND DENSITIES Section 1.0 Purpose and Intent Section 2.0 Scope Section 3.0 Definitions Section 4.0 Land Use Established Section 5.0 Standard Lot Dimensions by Land Use Section 6.0 Structure Height Section 7.0 Accessory Dwelling Units Section 8.0 Enforcement Section 9.0 Administrative Modifications of Standards Exhibit C-1 Land Use Categories 1.0 Purpose and Intent The purpose of this appendix is to encourage a variety of land uses, densities, and housing types to achieve the East VillageTALUS vision of an urban village, as described in the Planning Goals (Appendix A) and the Urban Village Design Guidelines (Appendix B). The standards set forth within this appendix are intended to guide the general location, bulk, and densities for the various land uses while allowing flexibility to respond to new and innovative approaches to an urban village setting. 2.0 Scope The provisions of this appendix shall apply to the East VillageTALUS Project. 3.0 Definitions 3.1. Accessory Dwelling Unit “Accessory Dwelling Unit” “(ADU)” means a room or set of rooms, either free standing, added onto or created within a single family residence. It generally includes living, sleeping, kitchen, and bathroom facilities, and has a lockable entrance. 3.2. Administrative Minor Modification “Administrative Modification” means those modifications to the East VillageTALUS Project meeting the standards and procedures for an administrative minor modification in Appendix K (Elections and Modifications), processed and approved pursuant to Appendix J (Processing). 3.3. Administrative Review “Administrative Review” means the administrative process established in Appendix J (Processing) of the East VillageTALUS Development Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • STANDARD PLAN RELEASE SUMMARY(SPR) Physical Facilities Department
    STANDARD PLAN RELEASE SUMMARY(SPR) Physical Facilities Department Building Design: Legacy 98 Release Date: November 2003 Release Number: 9 Summarized below is a list of modifications made to the Standard Plans, which are applicable to the Building Design indicated. This list is not intended to be exhaustive or detailed in nature, but is a tool for Project Managers and their consultants to quickly identify the changes made since the last Standard Plan Update. The Priority Level is intended to identify four levels of implementation for current projects in the late design phase or construction phase. Current projects in the planning phase or early design phase should incorporate all Changes where applicable. Level 1 - Critical Priority: Implement Change even if building is near Substantial Completion; Level 2 - High Priority: Implement Change even when Change may require minor additional cost - if Change will require significant additional cost or time, Change is left to PM's discretion; Level 3 - Standard Priority: Implement Change at PM's sole discretion. Level 4 - Low Priority: Implement Change as appropriate to phase of project. Change should not affect cost or schedule. Affected Affected Item Sheet No's SPC Spec. Description No. and Detail No. Section No's Priority Level A1.1, A2.1, Entry Storefronts: Changed the configuration of the entry 1 A2.2, A3.3, 861.3 storefronts at Vestibules 109 &148 to reduce the size of the center A5.2 lite to avoid the look of an additional door. Restroom Bench: Changed the wood bench in restrooms 127 & 2 A6.6 880 128 to 1 inch solid plastic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hows, Whats and Wows of the Willis Tower a Guide for Teachers Skydeck Chicago
    THE HOWS, WHATS AND WOWS OF THE WILLIS TOWER A GUIDE FOR TEACHERS SKYDECK CHICAGO PROPERTY MANAGED BY U.S. EQUITIES ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC WELCOME TO SKYDECK CHICAGO AT WILLIS TOWER THE NATION’S TALLEST SCHOOL When you get back to your school, we hope your students will send us photos or write or create There are enough impressive facts about the Willis artwork about their experiences and share them Tower to make even the most worldly among us with us (via email or the mailing address at the end say, “Wow!” So many things at the Willis Tower can of this guide). We’ve got 110 stories already, and we be described by a superlative: biggest, fastest, would like to add your students’ experiences to our longest. But there is more to the building than all collection. these “wows”: 1,450 sky-scraping, cloud-bumping feet of glass and steel, 43,000 miles of telephone One photo will be selected as the “Photo of the cable, 25,000 miles of plumbing, 4.56 million Day” and displayed on our Skydeck monitors for all square feet of floor space and a view of four states. to see. Artwork and writing will posted on bulletin boards in the lunchroom area. Your students also Behind the “wows” are lots of “hows” and “whats” can post their Skydeck Chicago photos to the Willis for you and your students to explore. In this Tower or Skydeck Chicago pages on flickr, a free guide you will be introduced to the building—its public photo-sharing site: http://www.flickr.com/ beginnings as the Sears Tower and its design, photos/tags/willistower/ or http://www.flickr.com/ construction and place in the pantheon of photos/skydeckchicago/ skyscrapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Structural Models and Baseline Performance Analysis of the World Trade Center Towers
    NISTNCSTAR1-2A Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Reference Structural Models and Baseline Performance Analysis of the World Trade Center Towers William J. Fasclian Ridiard B. Garlocl< National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administrofion • U.S. Deportment of Commerce NIST NCSTAR 1-2A Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Reference Structural Models and Baseline Performance Analysis of the World Trade Center Towers William J. Faschan Richard B. Garlock Leslie E. Robertson Associates. R.L.L.P. September 2005 i % U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Michelle O'Neill. Acting Under Secretary for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director Abstract • Development of estimates of design gravity and wmd loads on the towers for implementation into the reference structural models and use in the baseline perfonnance analysis. Various wind load cases were considered in this study, including wind loads used in the original WTC design, wind loads based on two recent wind tunnel studies conducted in 2002 by Cennak Peterka Peterson, Inc. (CPP) and Rowan Williams Davies and Irwin, Inc. (RWDl) for insurance litigation concerning the towers, and refined wind load estimates developed by NIST from critical assessment of infonnation obtained from the CPP and RWDl reports and state-of-the-art considerations. The following three loading cases were considered for the baseline perfonnance analysis: - Original WTC design loads case. Loads included dead and live loads as in original WTC design in conjunction with original WTC design wind loads. - Slate-of-the-practice case.
    [Show full text]