Scope of Services Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scope of Services Template November 2018 SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR FINANCIAL PROJECT ID(S). To Be Determined by Task Work Order Continuing Services Existing Roadway Condition Assessment Report (ERCAR) Development District-Wide Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise 1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 6 3 PROJECT COMMON AND PROJECT GENERAL TASKS....................................... 34 4 ROADWAY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 44 5 ROADWAY PLANS .......................................................................................................... 51 6A DRAINAGE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 52 6B DRAINAGE PLANS .......................................................................................................... 56 7 UTILITIES .......................................................................................................................... 57 8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS, COMPLIANCE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES .................................................................................................................. 61 9 STRUCTURES - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS TASKS AND DRAWINGS .............................................................................................................................................. 68 10 STRUCTURES - BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REPORT .............................................. 69 11 STRUCTURES – TEMPORARY BRIDGE .................................................................... 71 12 STRUCTURES - SHORT SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE .............................................. 71 13 STRUCTURES - MEDIUM SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE .......................................... 73 14 STRUCTURES - STRUCTURAL STEEL BRIDGE ..................................................... 76 15 STRUCTURES - SEGMENTAL CONCRETE BRIDGE .............................................. 79 16 STRUCTURES - MOVABLE SPAN ................................................................................ 83 17 STRUCTURES – RETAINING WALLS......................................................................... 88 18 STRUCTURES - MISCELLANEOUS ............................................................................. 89 20 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS ........................................................ 92 21 SIGNALIZATION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 93 22 SIGNALIZATION PLANS ............................................................................................... 95 23 LIGHTING ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 96 24 LIGHTING PLANS ........................................................................................................... 99 25 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS ............................................................. 100 26 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANS .................................................................... 104 27 SURVEY ............................................................................................................................ 105 28 PHOTOGRAMMETRY .................................................................................................. 110 29 MAPPING ......................................................................................................................... 112 30 TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LIDAR ................................................................................ 115 31 ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................... 117 ii 31T TOLL FACILITY DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 136 32 NOISE BARRIERS IMPACT DESIGN ASSESSMENT IN THE DESIGN PHASE 143 33 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ................................ 147 34 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANS ....................................... 158 35 GEOTECHNICAL ........................................................................................................... 163 36 3D MODELING ............................................................................................................... 174 37 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 175 38 INVOICING LIMITS ...................................................................................................... 177 iii SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE/STRUCTURAL DESIGN This Exhibit forms an integral part of the agreement between the State of Florida Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT or FDOT) and ___________________________ (hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT) relative to the transportation facility described as follows: Financial Project ID: To be assigned under Task Work Order Federal Aid Project No.: N/A County Section No.: District-Wide Description: Development of Existing Roadway Conditions Assessment Report (ERCAR) and other Miscellaneous Assignments Bridge No(s).: To be assigned under Task Work Order Rail Road Crossing No: To be assigned under Task Work Order (See FDM Chapter 220)] Context Classification: To be assigned under Task Work 1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the DEPARTMENT in connection with the preparation and development of ERCAR reports, complete set of construction contract plans and documents, special provisions and/or any incidental engineering services, as necessary, for improvements to the transportation facility(ies) described herein. This contract is a general services contract for Engineering and Architectural Design Services covering multiple areas within Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise system of toll roads, which includes the Turnpike Mainline from Homestead to Wildwood (SR 821 and SR 91), Sawgrass Expressway (SR 869), Beachline East and West Expressway (SR 528), Southern Connector and Seminole Expressway (SR 417), Polk Parkway (SR 570), Veterans Expressway and Suncoast Parkway (SR 589), Western Beltway (SR 429), I-4 Connector, and other toll facilities, including Alligator Alley, Garcon Point, Mid-Bay Bridge, Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Pinellas Bayway, and any other toll road or facility that may be under the jurisdiction of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise during the term of this Agreement. The DEPARTMENT shall request CONSULTANT services on an as-needed basis. Services will be initiated and completed as directed by the Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise. There is no guarantee that any or all of the services described in this Agreement will be assigned during the term of this Agreement. Further, the CONSULTANT is providing these services on a nonexclusive basis. The DEPARTMENT, at its option, may elect to have any of the services set forth herein performed by the 4 CONSULTANT or DEPARTMENT staff. Work to be performed may be assigned individually or in groups and the DEPARTMENT will issue Task Work Order(s) to the CONSULTANT to perform the requested services. Fees will be negotiated when the Task Work Order is issued. Task Work Order(s) assigned under this Agreement may include all or a portion of the services described herein. While specific work assignments have not been identified at this time, it is anticipated that the primary scope of work will include, but is not limited to: • Development of Existing Roadway Conditions Assessment Report (ERCAR); The CONSULTANT shall provide a report that includes a detailed analysis of the existing conditions with respect to design standards and safety of the roadway, bridges, drainage, signing and miscellaneous project components. The result of the assessment will be a recommendation either for a roadway improvement, safety improvement, application of a variation, exception or documentation to remain, based on practical design and feasibility to construct. The report will provide a summary for each project element, a discussion of design criteria and safety issues, a recommendation, and an estimated construction cost as applicable to the project element. This summary will include a tabulation of all recommendations which will be cross-referenced to the section in the report where recommendation is detailed. The summary will also include a tabulation of cost for the applicable recommendations. The report will also include a summary of pavement recommendations resulting from the evaluation of the pavement coring report and field observations. The recommendations will address the required milling depths including areas of deep or full-depth milling, as deemed necessary. • Coordination with other Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) Departments (i.e., Design, Maintenance, Operations, etc.) for information, development, and/or determination of ERCAR recommendations. • Development of minor studies, concepts, and/or design memorandums in relation to improving the following elements: signing and pavement markings, roadway, operations, structures, lighting, and others. The general objective is for the CONSULTANT to prepare ERCAR Reports and supporting engineering analysis, calculations and
Recommended publications
  • The Gibraltar Highway Code
    P ! CONTENTS Introduction Rules for pedestrians 3 Rules for users of powered wheelchairs and mobility scooters 10 Rules about animals 12 Rules for cyclists 13 Rules for motorcyclists 17 Rules for drivers and motorcyclists 19 General rules, techniques and advice for all drivers and riders 25 Road users requiring extra care 60 Driving in adverse weather conditions 66 Waiting and parking 70 Motorways 74 Breakdowns and incidents 79 Road works, level crossings and tramways 85 Light signals controlling traffic 92 Signals by authorised persons 93 Signals to other road users 94 Traffic signs 96 Road markings 105 Vehicle markings 109 Annexes 1. You and your bicycle 112 2. Vehicle maintenance and safety 113 3. Vehicle security 116 4. First aid on the road 116 5. Safety code for new drivers 119 1 Introduction This Highway Code applies to Gibraltar. However it also focuses on Traffic Signs and Road Situations outside Gibraltar, that as a driver you will come across most often. The most vulnerable road users are pedestrians, particularly children, older or disabled people, cyclists, motorcyclists and horse riders. It is important that all road users are aware of The Code and are considerate towards each other. This applies to pedestrians as much as to drivers and riders. Many of the rules in the Code are legal requirements, and if you disobey these rules you are committing a criminal offence. You may be fined, or be disqualified from driving. In the most serious cases you may be sent to prison. Such rules are identified by the use of the words ‘MUST/ MUST NOT’.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT B CPC Report N 190230 ZRY (Residential Tower
    EXHIBIT B CPC Report N 190230 ZRY (Residential Tower Mechanical Voids) CITY PLANNING COMMISSION April 10, 2019, Calendar No. 11 N 190230 ZRY IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by the Department of City Planning pursuant to Section 201 of the New York City Charter for an amendment of Article II, Chapter 3 and related provisions of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York, modifying residential tower regulations to require certain mechanical spaces to be calculated as residential floor area. _____________________________________________________________________________ This application (N 190230 ZRY) for a zoning text amendment was filed by the Department of City Planning (DCP) on January 25, 2019 to discourage the use of excessively tall mechanical floors in high-density residential tower districts. The proposal would require that mechanical floors, typically excluded from zoning floor area calculations, would be counted toward the overall permitted floor area on the zoning lot if they are taller than new specified limits or overly concentrated in portions of the building. The proposed floor area requirements would apply to residential towers in non-contextual R9 and R10 Residence Districts and their equivalent Commercial Districts, as well as Special Purpose Districts that rely on underlying floor area and height and setback regulations or that are primarily residential in character. The provision would also apply to non-residential portions of a mixed-use building if the building contains a limited amount of non-residential floor area. BACKGROUND The New York City Zoning Resolution allows floor space containing mechanical equipment to be excluded from zoning floor area calculations, reflecting the recognition that these spaces perform important and necessary functions within buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Formalisation and Implementation of Road Junction Rules on an Autonomous Vehicle Modelled As an Agent
    Formalisation and Implementation of Road Junction Rules on an Autonomous Vehicle Modelled as an Agent Gleifer Vaz Alves1[0000−0002−5937−8193], Louise Dennis2[0000−0003−1426−1896], and Michael Fisher2[0000−0002−0875−3862] 1 UTFPR - Universidade Tecnol´ogicaFederal do Paran´a- Brazil [email protected] 2 Department of Computer Science, Univ. Liverpool, UK fL.A.Dennis, [email protected] Abstract. The design of autonomous vehicles includes obstacle detec- tion and avoidance, route planning, speed control, etc. However, there is a lack of an explicitely representation of the rules of the road on an autonomous vehicle. Additionally, it is necessary to understand the be- haviour of an autonomous vehicle in order to check whether or not it works according to the rules of the road. Here, we propose an agent- based architecture to embed the rules of the road into an agent repre- senting the behaviour of an autonomous vehicle. We use temporal logic to formally represent the rules of the road in a way it should be possible to capture when and how a given rule of the road can be applied. Our contributions include: i. suggestion of changes in the rules of the road; ii. representation of rules in a suitable way for an autonomous vehicle agent; iii. dealing with indeterminate terms in the Highway Code. Keywords: Agent · Autonomous Vehicles · Temporal Logic · Rules of the Road. 1 Introduction Usually, the design of current control software in autonomous vehicle does not explicitely implement the rules of the road. Here, we propose an architecture, where an agent represents the behaviour of an autonomous vehicle and temporal logic is used to formally specify a subset from the rules of the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Markings
    Road Markings Sketch A [A] Painted Island Marking [E] Mandatory Direction Arrows [I] Guideline Listing Markings [B] Edge Line Marking [F] Lane Line Markings [J] Pedestrian Crossing Lines [C] Furcation Arrow Markings [G] Lane Reduction Arrow Markings [K] Channelizing Line Marking [D] Mandatory Direction Arrows [H] Lane Line Markings EXCLUSIVE PARKING BAY MARKINGS L (Loading Bay) F (Fire Fighting Vehicles) A (Ambulances) B (Busses) T (Taxis) MB (Mini-Busses) Pedestrian Crossing Line Yellow Island Marking Yield Road Marking Boundary and Lane Line Markings Block Pedestrian Crossing No Overtaking or Crossing Lines Bus Lane No Overtaking Line Markings Box Junction Mandatory Direction Arrows Ahead Mandatory Direction Arrows Escape Road Ahead No overtaking/crossing ahead Arrester Bed Ahead Information Arrow Information Arrow Increase in Number of Lanes Increase in Number of Lanes Increase in Number of Lanes Ahead Ahead Ahead Word Marking for additional Word Marking for additional Guidance Guidance Painted Island vehicle may not Painted Island vehicle may not cross or stop on this marking cross or stop on this marking No Stopping Line No Parking Line No Overtaking Line Q When you approach this road marking: Ans Stop before the line & drive on when it is safe to do so Q In Sketch A above - when you are driving & want to change lanes from G to H - you must.. Only change lanes when safe to do so. Switch your indicators on in time to show what you are going to do. Ans Use the mirrors of your vehicle to ensure that you know of other traffic. Q In this Sketch: Vehicle B must stop behind vehicle A Drive nearer if that vehicle has driven off stop immediately behind the Ans stop line & drive on when is safe to do so Q In Sketch A - Label B is pointing to..
    [Show full text]
  • Space Efficiency in Multi-Use Tall Building
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Space Efficiency in Multi-Use Tall Building Authors: Mahjoub Elnimeiri, Research Associate, Illinois Institute of Technology Hyeong-Ill Kim, Professor, Illinois Institute of Technology Subject: Architectural/Design Keywords: Design Process Mixed-Use Planning Publication Date: 2004 Original Publication: CTBUH 2004 Seoul Conference Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Mahjoub Elnimeiri; Hyeong-Ill Kim Space Efficiency in Multi-Use Tall Building Hyeong-ill Kim1, Mahjoub Elnimeiri2, 1 Research Associate, College of Architecture, Illinois Institute of Technology 2Professor, College of Architecture, Illinois Institute of Technology Abstract This paper seeks to make a contribution to the development of the design strategies for multi-use tall buildings in relation to space efficiency of the building for architects, engineers and developers during their early phases of the design process. This research describes the complex challenges of a design development process influenced by vertically stacked functions. This paper addresses the important parameters in the design of multi-use tall buildings and their relationship to the space efficiency. Parameters including functions, lease span, floor-to-floor height, vertical transportation, site area, FAR(Floor Area Ratio), building height, number of floors, building size at the base and top, , aspect ratio, structural system were analyzed. Ten multi-use buildings were carefully surveyed and investigated through specific case studies. To achieve this comparative analysis, a comprehensive data base was established. Based on the results of the case studies, a set of quantitative analysis was performed to show relationship among design factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Cedral Lap Vertical Construction Details New Zealand
    Cedral Lap Vertical Construction Details New Zealand Table of contents General information 3 Ventilation 4 General components 5 Cedral Lap Vertical with timber batten construction 8 Cedral Lap Vertical with metal top hat construction 24 2 General information This document provides generic construction details for Cedral Lap façade systems to assist with the design of Cedral Lap façade. Construction details in this document have been independently certified for the purpose of compliance with Clause E2, External moisture, of the New Zealand Building Code within the scope of E2/VM1. The weatherproofing performance of any project specific detail or application that is different from or not included in the construction details of this document shall be evaluated by the project engineer or consultant. It is the responsibility of the project designer, architect and engineer to ensure that the information and construction details provided in this document are appropriate for the intended application. Cladding support frame and its connection to substructure shall be designed by the project engineer in accordance with the relevant standards. The support frame maximum deflection under the influence of load shall be limited to Span/250. The support frame, fixings, flashings and the like shall be of adequate corrosion resistance appropriate to the corrosivity category of the project location. Non-proprietary flashings and capping shall be designed with respect to project wind loading, relevant standards and regulations. This document is not designed to serve as an installation guide, and is intended to be used in conjunction with other relevant technical and installation documents. Construction details contained in this document are not to a specific scale, and are for illustration purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Family Dwelling Addition Handout 3-19
    HUMBOLDT COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT 25 W. FOURTH STREET WINNEMUCCA, NV 89446 (775) 623-6322 (775) 623-6337 – FAX hcnv.us (web site) [email protected] (e-mail) CITY OF WINNEMUCCA BUILDING DEPARTMENT 90 W. FOURTH STREET WINNEMUCCA, NV 89445 (775) 623-6319 (775) 623-6321 - FAX RESIDENTIAL ADDITION PERMIT GUIDE March 2019 GENERAL INFORMATION This guide outlines the requirements for obtaining a building permit to construct a residential addition in Humboldt County. In order to ensure that your application is processed in a timely manner, your submittal package must be complete. Once submitted, your plan package will require review and approval from the following County and State Agencies: Zoning Approval Humboldt County Planning & Zoning Department (Site Plan/Zoning Codes) 623-6393 Street Excavation Humboldt County Road Department 623-6416 Excavation permits are available from the Road Department for any excavation in a county road easement or right of Way Plan Review Humboldt County Building Department Flood Zone Area Review Humboldt County Building Department Water/Domestic Well Installation Shall be approved by Nevada State Water Resources (775) 684-2800 Nevada State Manufactured Housing Division (702) 486 – 4138 - Las Vegas Upon submitting your plans to the Building Department and prior to final inspection, the applicant will need to contact the Bureau of Health Protection Services for septic approval. Written approval shall be submitted to this office. Approval from water district or sewer districts is also required. We recommend you
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Harris County, Texas
    RULES OF HARRIS COUNTY, INCLUDING THE HARRIS COUNTY TOLL ROAD AUTHORITY, A DIVISION OF HARRIS COUNTY, AND THE HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES WITHIN HARRIS COUNTY AND THE HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHTS-OF-WAY JOHN R. BLOUNT, P.E. HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEER GARY K. TRIETSCH, P.E. HCTRA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RUSSELL A. POPPE, P.E. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Formatted: Normal, Left, Border: Top: (No border), Bottom: (No border), Left: (No border), Right: (No border) Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, Not Bold, Not Expanded by / Condensed by 1 AS AMENDED: EFFECTIVE: 2 I N D E X SECTION 1 AUTHORITY SECTION 2 JURISDICTION SECTION 3 PURPOSE SECTION 4 CONSTRUCTION OF RULES SECTION 5 DEFINITIONS SECTION 6 RIGHT-OF-ENTRY TO COUNTY OR HCFCD ROW SECTION 7 CONSTRUCTION DRAWING SUBMITTALS SECTION 8 TRAFFIC CONTROL SECTION 9 SEALING OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS SECTION 10 CERTIFICATES, FEES AND BONDS SECTION 11 EMERGENCY REPAIRS SECTION 12 INTERFERENCE WITH USE OF THE ROW SECTION 13 TRENCHING SECTION 14 USE OF THE ROADWAY SECTION 15 NOTIFICATION PRIOR TO WORK SECTION 16 UTILITIES SECTION 17 UTILITY POLES SECTION 18 PERMANENT UTILITIES SECTION 19 HIGH PRESSURE PIPELINES SECTION 20 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SECTION 21 PAVING SECTION 22 MONUMENTS SECTION 23 SOIL BORING AND MONITORING WELL REQUIREMENTS SECTION 24 DAMAGE TO HARRIS COUNTY OR HCFCD ROW SECTION 25 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SECTION 26 LIABILITY SECTION 27 VARIANCES SECTION 28 CONSTRUCTION PER DRAWINGS SECTION 29 INSPECTIONS SECTION 30
    [Show full text]
  • Elevator Pressurization in Tall Buildings 2. Journal Paper Ctbuh
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Elevator Pressurization in Tall Buildings Author: John H. Klote, Smoke and Fire Consulting Subjects: Fire & Safety Vertical Transportation Keywords: Fire Safety Vertical Transportation Publication Date: 2013 Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 2 Number 4 Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / John H. Klote International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of December 2013, Vol 2, No 4, 341-344 High-Rise Buildings www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php Elevator Pressurization in Tall Buildings John H. Klote† Smoke and Fire Consulting, 19355 Cypress Ridge Terrace, Leesburg, VA 20176, USA Abstract During a building fire, smoke can flow through elevator shafts threatening life on floors remote from the fire. Many buildings have pressurized elevators intended to prevent such smoke flow. The computer program, CONTAM, can be used to analyze the performance of pressurization smoke control systems. The design of pressurized elevators can be challenging for the following reasons: (1) often the building envelope is not capable of effectively handling the large airflow resulting from elevator pressurization, (2) open elevator doors on the ground floor tend to increase the flow from the elevator shaft at the ground floor, and (3) open exterior doors on the ground floor can cause excessive pressure differences across the elevator shaft at the ground floor. To meet these challenges, the following systems have been developed: (1) exterior vent (EV) system, (2) floor exhaust (FE) system, and ground floor lobby (GFL) system.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Center, Thompson Center Name of Multiple Property Listing N/A (Enter "N/A" If Property Is Not Part of a Multiple Property Listing)
    NPS Form 10900 OMB No. 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name State of Illinois Center other names/site number James R. Thompson Center, Thompson Center Name of Multiple Property Listing N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) 2. Location street & number 100 West Randolph Street not for publication city or town Chicago vicinity state Illinois county Cook zip code 60601 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official/Title: Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Date Illinois Department of Natural Resources - SHPO State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Schematic Design Narrative
    Valdez Middle School Project Project No.: 11‐310‐9507 City of Valdez Schematic Design Narrative June 27, 2012 ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, INTERIOR DESIGNERS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Valdez Middle School Schematic Design Submittal TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 2 Overview 3 Code Summary 5 Environmental Design Narrative 7 Geotechnical Narrative 8 Landscape Design Narrative 12 Civil Design Narrative 16 Architectural Narrative 19 Structural Design Narrative 21 Mechanical Design Narrative 22 Electrical Design Narrative 29 Appendix A: “Valdez Middle School Site Pre‐Demolition Hazardous Building Materials & Environmental Assessment” BETTISWORTH NORTH ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS 212 FRONT ST FAIRBANKS AK 99701 907 456 5780 1 Valdez Middle School Schematic Design Submittal ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Client City of Valdez P.O. Box 307, Valdez, AK 99686 John Hozey, City Manager Jack McCay, Project Manager Valdez City School District P.O. Box 398, Valdez, AK 99686 Jacob Jensen, Superintendent Rod Morrison, Junior High Principal Consultant Team Bettisworth North Architects and Planners (Architect/Landscape Architect) 212 Front Street, Fairbanks, AK 99701 Charles Bettisworth, Principal in Charge Tracy Vanairsdale, Principal, Project Manager Mark Kimerer, Project Landscape Architect DeJong‐Richter (Educational Specifications) 4945 Badenton Blvd., Suite B, Dublin, OH 43017 Bill DeJong, Principal Tracy Richter, Principal CRW Engineering Group, LLC (Civil) 3940 Arctic Blvd., #300, Anchorage, AK 99503 Pete Bellezza, Principal Civil Engineer BBFM Engineers Inc. (Structural) 510 L Street, Suite 200, Anchorage, AK 99501 Forrest T. Braun, Principal Structural Engineer RSA Engineering, Inc. (Mechanical/Electrical) 2522 Arctic Blvd., Anchorage, AK 99503 Brian Pekar, Senior Mechanical Engineer Channing Lillo, Associate Principal Electrical Engineer Shannon & Wilson, Inc. (Geotechnical) 2355 Hill Road, Fairbanks, AK 99709 Steve Adamczak, Principal Geotechnical Engineer NORTECH, Inc.
    [Show full text]