DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Natural Resources Management in Watersheds (INRMW) of Georgia Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Natural Resources Management in Watersheds (INRMW) of Georgia Program Integrated Natural Resources Management in Watersheds (INRMW) of Georgia Program Technical Report 2. Rapid Assessment of the Rioni and Alazani-Iori River Basins of Georgia June, 2011 Prepared by: Mariam Shotadze & Eliso Barnovi INRMW Country Program Director & Deputy Director in Cooperation with Program Consortium Members: CENN, Care International, Winrock International and its Sub-contractor Sustainable Development and Policy Center Telephone: +99532 2 157 156 Email: [email protected] This study is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Agreement No.CA # AID-114-LA-10-00004. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 1 CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 4 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 16 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 16 1.2 Objectives and Scope ................................................................................................................. 16 1.3 Methodology, Limitations ......................................................................................................... 18 2.0 GEOGRAPHIC, ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT .............................................................. 19 2.1 Physical-Geographic and Environmental Context ..................................................................... 19 2.1.1 General Characteristics of the Basins ............................................................................................... 19 2.1.2 Climate of the Pilot Basins ................................................................................................................ 19 2.1.3 Geo-morphology, Geology ................................................................................................................ 21 2.1.4 Landscapes, Biodiveristy ................................................................................................................... 30 2.1.5. Forest Resources .............................................................................................................................. 53 2.1.6 Land Resources ................................................................................................................................. 71 2.1.7 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................ 81 2.1.8 Energy Resources .............................................................................................................................. 91 2.1.9 Hydrology, Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................. 96 2.2 Socio-economic Context .......................................................................................................... 110 2.2.1 Demographic Situation ................................................................................................................... 110 2.2.2 Economic Activities ......................................................................................................................... 111 2.2.3 Culture ............................................................................................................................................. 127 2.2.4 Local Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................... 130 3.0 INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................... 147 3.1 Regional Governments ............................................................................................................ 147 3.1.1 Regional Governments Located in the Alazani Basin ...................................................................... 147 3.1.2 Regional Governments Located in the Iori Basin ............................................................................ 149 3.1.3 Regional Governments Located in the Rioni Basin ......................................................................... 150 3.2 Municipal Authorities .............................................................................................................. 151 2 3.2.1 Municipalities Located in the Alazani Basin .................................................................................... 151 3.2.2 Municipalities Located in the Iori Basin .......................................................................................... 156 3.2.3 Municipalities Located in the Rioni Basin ....................................................................................... 157 3.3 Local Territorial Units of Municipalities ................................................................................. 172 3.3.2 Local Territorial Units in the Iori River Basin ................................................................................... 174 3.3.3 Territorial Units of Municipalities in the Rioni River Basin ............................................................. 175 4.0 PRESSURES AND IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL RESOURCES ....................................................................... 181 4.1 Water Resources ...................................................................................................................... 181 4.1.1 Pressures on Water Quantity .......................................................................................................... 181 4.1.2 Pressures on Water Quality ............................................................................................................ 185 4.1.3 Impacts on Water Quantity............................................................................................................. 192 4.1.4 Impacts on Water Quality ............................................................................................................... 199 4.2 Land Resources ........................................................................................................................ 204 4.2.1 Pressures on Land Resources .......................................................................................................... 204 4.2.2 Impacts on Land Resources ............................................................................................................. 212 4.3 Landscapes and Biological Resources ..................................................................................... 224 4.3.1 Pressures on Landscapes and Biodiversity ..................................................................................... 224 4.3.2 Environmental Impacts on Ecosystems and Biodiversity ............................................................... 240 4.4 Utilization of Local Energy Resources .................................................................................... 243 4.5 Linkages between Resources Uses and Ecosystem Functions ................................................ 245 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 250 5.1 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 250 5.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 253 ANNEXES .......................................................................................................................................................... 255 SOURCES OF INFORMATION: ........................................................................................................................... 256 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABREVIATIONS 1. INRMW – Integrated Natural Resources Management in Watersheds 2. USAID – United States Agency for International Development 3. AD - after death 4. ADB – Asian Development Bank 5. Al – Aluminum 6. As2S3 - Auripigment 7. a.s.l. – above sea level 8. As4S4 - Realgar 9. As2O3 – Arsenic Trioxide 10. BC - before Christ 11. Bi - Bismuth 12. BPO - Business Process Outsourcing 13. C – Temperature degree by Celsius scale 14. c – century 15. Cd – Cadmium 16. CO – Connecticut 17. Co – cobalt 18. cpu/100 ml - count per 100 ml 19. Cr - Chromium 20. Cu – Copper (Cuprum) 21. DDT - dichloro biphenyl trichloroethane 22. EVDO - Evolution-Data Optimized 23. EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment 24. EBRD – European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 25. ESCO – Electricity Sector Commercial Operation 26. ESIA – Environmental and Social Impact Assessment 27. et al - et alii (and others) 28. EURO – EU currency 29. FDI – Foreign Direct Investment 30. Fe – Iron (Ferrum) 31. FIZ – Free Industrial Zone 32. FSL – Full Supply Level 33. GDP – Gross Domestic Product 34. GEF – Global Environment Facility 35. GEL – Georgian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Georgian Wine Infographics
    KAKHETI WINE MAP Akhmeta, Telavi, Gurjaani, Kvareli, Lagodekhi I GEORGIA o Abkhazia Svaneti 0 10 20 40 KM Racha-Lechkhumi Kvemo Svaneti Mtskheta Samegrelo Tskhinvali Region Mtianeti South Ossetia KUTAISI Guria Imereti Shida Kartli TELAVI BATUMI KAKHETI Ajara Samtskhe TBILISI Javakheti Kvemo kartli Viticultural Districts White Wine vazis gavrcelebis areali TeTri Rvino Winegrowing Centre Amber Wine mevenaxeoba - meRvineobis kera qarvisferi Rvino Qvevri making Centre * NAPAREULI PDO qvevris warmoebis kera Fortified Wine Semagrebuli Rvino Red Wine TELIANI PDO wiTeli Rvino * *Red Semisweet Wine KINDZMARAULI PDO Maghraani wiTeli Pshaveli naxevradtkbili Matani Kvemo Artana Rvino alvani AKHMETA Naphareuli KVARELI PDO Zemo Gremi alvani Shilda Eniseli Ikalto KVARELI Kurdghelauri Vardisubani Kondoli Akhalsopeli KAKHETI PDO TELAVI Tsinandali Akura Chikaani Kalauri Gavazi LAGODEKHI TSINANDALI Protected Vazisubani Velistsikhe Designation of Origin Mukuzani Akhasheni Chumlaki VAZISUBANI PDO GURJAANI KOTEKHI PDO Bakurtsikhe Kardenakhi MUKUZANI PDO Kachreti * Chalaubani AKHASHENI PDO KARDENAKHI PDO * Major Grapes of Kakheti GURJAANI PDO yvelaze gavrcelebuli vazis jiSebi Rkatsiteli, Saperavi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Khikhvi, Kisi rqawiTeli, saferavi, mwvane kaxuri, xixvi, qisi Saperavi, Rkatsiteli, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Kisi, Khikhvi saferavi, rqawiTeli, wvane kaxuri, qisi, xixvi Rkatsiteli, Kisi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Saperavi rqawiTeli, qisi, mwvane kaxuri, saferavi Other Varieties sxva jiSebi White: Kakhuri Mtsvivani, Grdzelmtevana, Vardispheri Rkatsiteli, Kurmi, Tetri Mirzaanuli, Ghrubela, Chitistvala, Saphena TeTri: kaxuri mcvivani, grZelmtevana, vardisferi rqawiTeli, kumsi, TeTri mirzaanuli, Rrubela, CitisTvala, safena Red: Tsiteli Budeshuri, Kumsi Tsiteli, Ikaltos Tsiteli, Kharistvala, Zhghia wiTeli: wiTeli budeSuri, kumsi wiTeli, iyalTos wiTeli, xarisTvala, JRia Authors: Zaza Gagua, Paata Dvaladze, Malkhaz Kharbedia Design: Paata Dvaladze Author of Project: Malkhaz Kharbedia © NATIONAL WINE AGENCY © Georgian Wine Club © GEORGIAN WINE INFOGRAPHICS.
    [Show full text]
  • RBMP SEA Report ENG FINAL
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF THE DRAFTALAZANI-IORI RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN SEA Report November 2020 2 This SEA report was prepared by the national SEA team established for the pilot project “The Application of a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Draft Alazani-Iori River Basin Management Plan” (hereinafter also the SEA pilot project): Ms. Elina Bakradze (water and soil quality aspects), Ms. Anna Rukhadze (biodiversity, habitats and protected areas), Ms. Lela Serebryakova (health related aspects), Mr. Giorgi Guliashvili (hydrology and natural hazards), Mr. Davit Darsavelidze (socio-economic aspects), Mr. Irakli Kobulia (cultural heritage aspects and GIS) and the UNECE national consultant Ms. Irma Melikishvili (the team leader also covering climate change aspects), under the guidance and supervision of the UNECE international consultant Mr. Martin Smutny. Maps: The thematic maps presented in the SEA Report are produced by Mr. Irakli Kobulia on the basis of the GIS database provided by the EUWI + programme. The SEA Report also includes maps developed in the framework of the EUWI + programme (under result 2) by the REC Caucasus, subcontractor of the EUWI+ programme. The SEA pilot project was carried out under the supervision of Mr. Alisher Mamadzhanov, the EUWI+ programme leader from UNECE with the support provided by Ms. Christine Kitzler and Mr. Alexander Belokurov, UNECE and Ms. Eliso Barnovi, the EUWI+ Country Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review
    UNECE Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review UNITED NATIONS ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS GEORGIA Third Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2016 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 43 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the second Environmental Performance Review of Georgia (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 30) in 2010. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.16.II.E.3 ISBN 978-92-1-117101-3 e-ISBN 978-92-1-057683-3 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword It is essential to monitor progress towards environmental sustainability and to evaluate how countries reconcile environmental and economic targets and meet their international environmental commitments. Through regular monitoring and evaluation, countries may more effectively stay ahead of emerging environmental issues, improve their environmental performance and be accountable to their citizens. The ECE Environmental Performance Review Programme provides valuable assistance to member States by regularly assessing their environmental performance so that they can take steps to improve their environmental management, integrate environmental considerations into economic sectors, increase the availability of information to the public and promote information exchange with other countries on policies and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers Change Over the Last Century, Caucasus Mountains, Georgia
    1 Glaciers change over the last century, Caucasus Mountains, 2 Georgia, observed by the old topographical maps, Landsat 3 and ASTER satellite imagery 4 5 L. G. Tielidze 6 7 Department of Geomorphology, Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane 8 Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, 6 Tamarashvili st. Tbilisi 0177, Georgia 9 10 Correspondence to: L. G. Tielidze ([email protected]) 11 12 13 Abstract 14 15 The study of glaciers in the Caucasus began in the first quarter of the 18th century. The 16 first data on glaciers can be found in the works of great Georgian scientist Vakhushti 17 Bagrationi. After almost hundred years the foreign scientists began to describe the 18 glaciers of Georgia. Information about the glaciers of Georgia can be found in the 19 works of W. Abich, D. Freshfield, G. Radde, N. Dinik, I. Rashevskiy, A. Reinhardt etc. The 20 first statistical information about the glaciers of Georgia are found in the catalog of the 21 Caucasus glaciers compiled by K. Podozerskiy in 1911. Then, in 1960s the large-scale 22 (1 : 25 000, 1 : 50 000) topographic maps were published, which were compiled in 23 1955–1960 on the basis of the airphotos. On the basis of the mentioned maps R. 24 Gobejishvili gave quite detailed statistical information about the glaciers of Georgia. Then 25 in 1975 the results of glaciers inventory of the former USSR was published, where the 26 statistical information about the glaciers of Georgia was obtained on the basis of the 27 almost same time (1955-1957) aerial images.
    [Show full text]
  • Phasian Confusion. Notes on Kolchian, Armenian and Pontic River Names in Myth, History and Geography*
    Phasis 21-22, 2019 PHASIAN CONFUSION. NOTES ON KOLCHIAN, ARMENIAN AND PONTIC RIVER NAMES IN MYTH, HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY* ALTAY COŞKUN Abstract. Due to its close link with the legendary kingdom of Aia, where the Argonauts found the Golden Fleece, the Kolchian Phasis is one of the most illustrious rivers in world literature. It is, at the same time, surrounded by several controversies, ancient as well as modern. The evidence seems to suggest that it was first pictured as part of the mythical landscape around 500 B.C. Mythical narratives, colonial ideologies, reports of explorers and geographical speculation led to a heterogeneous, in part fancy tradition, as is best exemplified by the Phasis/Tanaïs/Don, which was fathomed with a second outlet into the Baltic Sea. This notwithstanding, the concept of the Kolchian Phasis was quite sober. Eratosthenes, Strabo and the mainstream literary tradition identified it with the modern Rioni only as far as Rhodo- polis/Geguti, whence its middle course equals the Kvirila River to Sarapa- * I am grateful to Jean Coert (Bremen) and Anca Dan (Paris) as well as the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback, and to Stone Chen for produc- ing the maps with me. All remaining errors are mine. I would further like to thank the University of Waterloo and the Social Science and Humanities Council of Canada (SSHRC) for supporting my research on the Ancient Black Sea. See altaycoskun.com for progress. 74 ALTAY COŞKUN na/Shoropani; its upper course, now the Barimela, connected it with its Ar- menian source. The knowledge that Herodotos and Xenophon had of the Phasis/Rioni and of the Araxes/Phasis/Aras was limited but not confused.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Potentials in Georgia
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1(En) ISSN 2070-6065 REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1 (En) REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA by Marina Khavtasi † Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Marina Makarova Head of Division Water Resources Protection Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Irina Lomashvili Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Archil Phartsvania National Consultant Thomas Moth-Poulsen Fishery Officer FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Budapest, Hungary András Woynarovich FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier Change Over the Last Century, Caucasus Mountains, Georgia, Observed from Old Topographical Maps, Landsat and ASTER Satellite Imagery
    The Cryosphere, 10, 713–725, 2016 www.the-cryosphere.net/10/713/2016/ doi:10.5194/tc-10-713-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Glacier change over the last century, Caucasus Mountains, Georgia, observed from old topographical maps, Landsat and ASTER satellite imagery Levan G. Tielidze Department of Geomorphology, Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane, Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, 6 Tamarashvili st., 0177 Tbilisi, Georgia Correspondence to: Levan G. Tielidze ([email protected]) Received: 12 May 2015 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 17 July 2015 Revised: 29 February 2016 – Accepted: 11 March 2016 – Published: 21 March 2016 Abstract. Changes in the area and number of glaciers and global climate where other long-term records may not in the Georgian Caucasus Mountains were examined exist, as changes in glacier mass and/or extent can reflect over the last century, by comparing recent Landsat and changes in temperature and/or precipitation (e.g. Oerlemans ASTER images (2014) with older topographical maps (1911, and Fortuin, 1992; Meier et al., 2007). Regular and detailed 1960) along with middle and high mountain meteoro- observations of alpine glacier behaviour are necessary in re- logical stations data. Total glacier area decreased by gions such as the Georgian Caucasus, where the glaciers 8.1 ± 1.8 % (0.2 ± 0.04 % yr−1) or by 49.9 ± 10.6 km2 from are an important source of water for agricultural produc- 613.6 ± 9.8 km2 to 563.7 ± 11.3 km2 during 1911–1960, tion, and runoff in large glacially fed rivers (Kodori, Enguri, while the number of glaciers increased from 515 to 786.
    [Show full text]
  • (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 Km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized
    Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure of Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Construction Works for the Gurjaani (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized October 2018 LIST OF ACRONIMS EA - Environmental Assessment EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan ESIA - Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP - Environmental and Social Management Plan HSE - Health, Safety, Environment HS - Health and Safety GIS - Geographic Information System GoG - Government of Georgia IPPC - Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control KP - Kilometer Post MESD - Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia MEPA - Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia MLHSA - Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia NGO - Non-Governmental Organization RD - Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia MRDI - Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia ToR - Terms of Reference WB - The World Bank Contents 2.1 Environmental Policies and Laws of Georgia ...............................................................................................2 2.2 Laws and Regulations Related to Social Aspects and Land Ownership ......................................................5 2.3 Labor Legislation ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Appellations of Origin of Georgian Wine
    NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CENTER OF GEORGIA SAKPATENTI Appellations of Origin of Georgian Wine OFFICIAL BULLETIN OF THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY SPECIAL EDITION NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CENTER OF GEORGIA SAKPATENTI Appellations of Origin of Georgian Wine TBILISI 2010 GEORGIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABKHAZETI SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI SAMEGRELO BLAC K S E A IMERETI KARTLI GURIA KAKHETI Tbilisi SAMTSKHE- A DJ A R A -JAVAKHETI TURKEY AZERBAIJAN A R ME N I A PREFACE In Georgia, a country with rich culture of wine-growing and wine-making, the tradition of using the geographical name of the place of origin as the appellation of a wine has a long history. Although the territory of Georgia is not large, the number of these appellations is nevertheless significant. Each of them is distinguished by special characteristics, high quality and reputation, which is influenced by the unique environmental conditions of Georgia. After the entry into force of the legal framework governing the protection of appellations of origin of wines, 18 appellations of origin of Georgian wines have been registered at National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia “Sakpatenti”. The Law of Georgia “On Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications of Goods” defines the concept of appellation of origin and geographical indication and stipulates: 1. An appellation of origin is a modern or historical name of a geographical place, region or, in exceptional cases, a name of a country (hereinafter “geographical area”), used to designate the goods: (a) originating within the given geographical area; (b) the specific quality and features of which are essentially or exclusively due to a particular geographical environment and human factors; (c) production, processing and preparation of which take place within the geographical area.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 Trademarks Indicating a Place of Origin of Wines Or Spirits Of
    Appendix 2-1 [The Patent Office Gazette (public notice) issued on June 23, 1995] Trademarks Indicating a Place of Origin of Wines or Spirits of WTO Member Countries as Stipulated in Article 4(1)(xvii) of the Trademark Act The following appellations of origin of wines or spirits that are registered internationally under Article 5(1) of the “Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (1958)” shall be deemed to fall under a mark indicating a place of origin of wines or spirits in a member of the WTO prohibited to be used on wines or spirits not originating in the region of that member referred to in Article 4(1)(xvii) of the Trademark Act that entered into effect on July 1, 1995, except when the international registration has been cancelled or when there are other special reasons. Herein is the announcement to that effect. (Lists on public notice are omitted) (Explanation) In utilizing Appendix 2 1. Purport for preparing this material In the recent revision of the Trademark Act pursuant to the Act for Partial Revision of the Patent Act, etc. (Act No. 116 of 1994), Article 4(1)(xvii) was newly added in accordance with Annex IC “Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement)” of the “Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO),” which accords additional protection to geographical indications of wines and spirits. This material, which was prepared as examination material related to Article 4(1)(xvii) of the Trademark Act, provides
    [Show full text]
  • Support in the Delineation and Characterization of Groundwater Bodies and the Design of a Ground- Water Monitoring Network in the Alazani-Iori Basin Districts
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 SUPPORT IN THE DELINEATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GROUNDWATER BODIES AND THE DESIGN OF A GROUND- WATER MONITORING NETWORK IN THE ALAZANI-IORI BASIN DISTRICTS IN GEORGIA Version EUWI-EAST-GE-03; February 2019 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Michael Sutter, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Georgia Zurab Jincharadze Responsible international thematic lead expert Christoph Leitner, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Responsible Georgian thematic lead expert Nana Kitiashvili and Merab Gaprindashvili (Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Geor- gia, LEPL National Environmental Agency) Authors Prepared by: Georgian Geothermal Association+ G. Melikadze, Al. Gventsadze, N. Kapanadze, S. Vepkhvadze, M. Todadze Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the technical report “SUPPORT IN THE DELINEATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GROUNDWATER BODIES AND THE DESIGN OF A GROUNDWA-TER MONITORING NET-WORKIN THE ALAZANI-IORI AND KHRAMI-DEBED RIVER BASIN DISTRICTS IN GEORGIA”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2-1 [The Patent Office Gazette (Public Notice) Issued On
    Appendix 2-1 [The Patent Office Gazette (public notice) issued on June 23, 1995] Trademarks Indicating a Place of Origin of Wines or Spirits of WTO Member Countries as Stipulated in Article 4(1)(xvii) of the Trademark Act The following appellations of origin of wines or spirits that are registered internationally under Article 5(1) of the “Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (1958)” shall be deemed to fall under a mark indicating a place of origin of wines or spirits in a member of the WTO prohibited to be used on wines or spirits not originating in the region of that member referred to in Article 4(1)(xvii) of the Trademark Act that entered into effect on July 1, 1995, except when the international registration has been cancelled or when there are other special reasons. Herein is the announcement to that effect. (Lists on public notice are omitted) (Explanation) In utilizing Appendix 2 1. Purport for preparing this material In the recent revision of the Trademark Act pursuant to the Act for Partial Revision of the Patent Act, etc. (Act No. 116 of 1994), Article 4(1)(xvii) was newly added in accordance with Annex IC “Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement)” of the “Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO),” which accords additional protection to geographical indications of wines and spirits. This material, which was prepared as examination material related to Article 4(1)(xvii) of the Trademark Act, provides
    [Show full text]