DOCSLIB.ORG

Cicero: First Speech Against Catiline Delivered in the Roman Senate (63 BCE) Translated by Charles Duke Yonge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cicero: First Speech Against Catiline Delivered in the Roman Senate (63 BCE) Translated by Charles Duke Yonge Cicero: First Speech against Catiline Delivered in the Roman Senate (63 BCE) Translated by Charles Duke Yonge Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BCE–43 BCE): Rome’s finest orator, Cicero was born at Arpinum on 3 January 106 BCE, and killed at Formia while fleeing from his political enemies on 7 December 43 BCE. served in the Social War in 89; Questor in Sicily in 75; Edile in 69; Prætor in 66; Consul in 63, during the Catiline conspiracy; banished in 58; Proconsul of Cilicia in 51–50; allied with Pompey (against Julius Caesar) in 49, and proscribed by the Second Triumvirate. Of his orations, fifty-seven have been preserved. HEN, O Catiline, do you mean to What? Did not that most illustrious man, cease abusing our patience? How Publius Scipio, the Pontifex Maximus, in his W long is that madness of yours still to capacity of a private citizen, put to death mock us? When is there to be an end of that Tiberius Gracchus, tho but slightly undermining unbridled audacity of yours, swaggering about the constitution? And shall we, who are the as it does now? Do not the nightly guards placed consuls, tolerate Catiline, openly desirous to on the Palatine Hill—do not the watches posted destroy the whole world with fire and slaughter? throughout the city—does not the alarm of the For I pass over older instances, such as how people, and the union of all good men—does not Caius Servilius Ahala with his own hand slew the precaution taken of assembling the senate in Spurius Mælius when plotting a revolution in this most defensible place—do not the looks and the state. There was—there was once such virtue countenances of this venerable body here in this republic that brave men would repress present, have any effect upon you? Do you not mischievous citizens with severer chastisement feel that your plans are detected? Do you not see than the most bitter enemy. For we have a that your conspiracy is already arrested and resolution of the senate, a formidable and rendered powerless by the knowledge which authoritative decree against you, O Catiline; the every one here possesses of it? What is there that wisdom of the republic is not at fault, nor the you did last night, what the night before—where dignity of this senatorial body. We, we alone—I is it that you were—who was there that you say it openly,—we, the consuls, are wanting in summoned to meet you—what design was there our duty. which was adopted by you, with which you The senate once passed a decree that Lucius think that any one of us is unacquainted? Opimius, the consul, should take care that the Shame on the age and on its principles! The republic suffered no injury. Not one night senate is aware of these things; the consul sees elapsed. There was put to death, on some mere them; and yet this man lives. Lives! aye, he suspicion of disaffection, Caius Gracchus, a man comes even into the senate. He takes a part in whose family had borne the most unblemished the public deliberations; he is watching and reputation for many generations. There was slain marking down and checking off for slaughter Marcus Fulvius, a man of consular rank, and all every individual among us. And we, gallant men his children. By a like decree of the senate the that we are, think that we are doing our duty to safety of the republic was entrusted to Caius the republic if we keep out of the way of his Marius and Lucius Valerius, the consuls. Did not frenzied attacks. the vengeance of the republic, did not execution You ought, O Catiline, long ago to have overtake Lucius Saturninus, a tribune of the been led to execution by command of the consul. people, and Caius Servilius, the prætor, without That destruction which you have been long the delay of one single day? But we, for these plotting against us ought to have already fallen twenty days, have been allowing the edge of the on your own head. senate’s authority to grow blunt, as it were. For we are in possession of a similar decree of the senate, but we keep it locked up in its the senate that you had fixed the massacre of the parchment—buried, I may say, in the sheath; nobles for the 28th of October when many chief and according to this decree you ought, O men of the senate had left Rome, not so much Catiline, to be put to death this instant. You for the sake of saving themselves as of checking live—and you live, not to lay aside, but to your designs. Can you deny that on that very day persist in your audacity. you were so hemmed in by my guards and my I wish, O conscript fathers, to be merciful; I vigilance that you were unable to stir one finger wish not to appear negligent amid such danger against the republic; when you said that you to the state; but I do now accuse myself of would be content with the flight of the rest, and remissness and culpable inactivity. A camp is the slaughter of us who remained? What? when pitched in Italy, at the entrance of Etruria, in you made sure that you would be able to seize hostility to the republic; the number of the Præneste on the 1st of November by a nocturnal enemy increases every day; and yet the general attack, did you not find that that colony was of that camp, the leader of those enemies, we see fortified by my order, by my garrison, by my within the walls—aye, and even in the senate— watchfulness and care? You do nothing, you planning every day some internal injury to the plan nothing, you think of nothing which I not republic. If, O Catiline, I should now order you only do not hear, but which I do not see and to be arrested, to be put to death, I should, I know every particular of. suppose, have to fear lest all good men should Listen while I speak of the night before. say that I had acted tardily, rather than that any You shall now see that I watch far more actively one should affirm that I acted cruelly. But yet for the safety than you do for the destruction of this, which ought to have been done long since, I the republic. I say that you came the night before have good reason for not doing as yet; I will put (I will say nothing obscurely) into the you to death, then, when there shall be not one Scythedealers’ Street, to the house of Marcus person possible to be found so wicked, so Lecca; that many of your accomplices in the abandoned, so like yourself, as not to allow that same insanity and wickedness came there, too. it has been rightly done. As long as one person Do you dare to deny it? Why are you silent? I exists who can dare to defend you, you shall will prove it if you do deny it; for I see here in live; but you shall live as you do now, the senate some men who were there with you. surrounded by my many and trusty guards, so O ye immortal gods, where on earth are that you shall not be able to stir one finger we? in what city are we living? what against the republic; many eyes and ears shall constitution is ours? There are here,—here in still observe and watch you, as they have our body, O conscript fathers, in this the most hitherto done, tho you shall not perceive them. holy and dignified assembly of the whole world, For what is there, O Catiline, that you can men who meditate my death, and the death of all still expect, if night is not able to veil your of us, and the destruction of this city, and of the nefarious meetings in darkness, and if private whole world. I, the consul, see them; I ask them houses can not conceal the voice of your their opinion about the republic, and I do not yet conspiracy within their walls—if everything is attack, even by words, those who ought to be put seen and displayed? Change your mind: trust to death by the sword. You were, then, O me: forget the slaughter and conflagration you Catiline, at Lecca’s that night; you divided Italy are meditating. You are hemmed in on all sides; into sections; you settled where every one was to all your plans are clearer than the day to us; let go; you fixed whom you were to leave at Rome, me remind you of them. Do you recollect that on whom you were to take with you; you portioned the 21st of October I said in the senate that on a out the divisions of the city for conflagration; certain day, which was to be the 27th of you undertook that you yourself would at once October, C. Manlius, the satellite and servant of leave the city, and said that there was then only your audacity, would be in arms? Was I this to delay you,—that I was still alive. Two mistaken, Catiline, not only in so important, so Roman knights were found to deliver you from atrocious, so incredible a fact, but, what is much this anxiety, and to promise that very night, more remarkable, in the very day? I said also in before daybreak, to slay me in my bed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book I. Title XXVII. Concerning the Office of the Praetor Prefect Of
    Book I. Title XXVII. Concerning the office of the Praetor Prefect of Africa and concerning the whole organization of that diocese. (De officio praefecti praetorio Africae et de omni eiusdem dioeceseos statu.) Headnote. Preliminary. For a better understanding of the following chapters in the Code, a brief outline of the organization of the Roman Empire may be given, but historical works will have to be consulted for greater details. The organization as contemplated in the Code was the one initiated by Diocletian and Constantine the Great in the latter part of the third and the beginning of the fourth century of the Christian era, and little need be said about the time previous to that. During the Republican period, Rome was governed mainly by two consuls, tow or more praetors (C. 1.39 and note), quaestors (financial officers and not to be confused with the imperial quaestor of the later period, mentioned at C. 1.30), aediles and a prefect of food supply. The provinces were governed by ex-consuls and ex- praetors sent to them by the Senate, and these governors, so sent, had their retinue of course. After the empire was established, the provinces were, for a time, divided into senatorial and imperial, the later consisting mainly of those in which an army was required. The senate continued to send out ex-consuls and ex-praetors, all called proconsuls, into the senatorial provinces. The proconsul was accompanied by a quaestor, who was a financial officer, and looked after the collection of the revenue, but who seems to have been largely subservient to the proconsul.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 State Latin Forum Certamen
    2007 FJCL Certamen Level I, Round 1 1. Who was the second of the Five Good Emperors? TRAJAN Which of the Five Good Emperors constructed a wall in Scotland? ANTONINUS PIUS Which of the Five Good Emperors rebuilt the Pantheon? HADRIAN 2. Which case is governed by the preposition prō? ABLATIVE Which case is governed by the preposition prae? ABLATIVE Which case is goverrned by the preposition sine? ABLATIVE 3. Give the Latin and English for the motto of New York. EXCELSIOR, EVER UPWARD Give the Latin and English for the motto of North Carolina. ESSE QUAM VIDERI, TO BE RATHER THAN TO SEEM Give the Latin and English for the motto of Kansas. AD ASTRA PER ASPERA, TO THE STARS WITH DIFFICULTIES 4:. What form did Zeus assume when he carried off Europa? A BULL What form did Zeus assume when he seduced Danae? A SHOWER OF LIGHT What form did Zeus assume when he seduced Alcmene? AMPHITRYON 5. What structure in ancient Rome was located in the valley between the Palatine and Aventine hills and hosted chariot races? CIRCUS MAXIMUS What structure in ancient Rome was located between the Palatine and Esquiline hills and hosted gladiatorial combats? COLOSSEUM What structure in ancient Rome, built in 55 B.C., was located in the Campus Martius and hosted theatrical performances? THEATER OF POMPEY 6. From what Latin verb with what meaning do we derive “important?” PORTO, CARRY From what Latin verb with what meaning do we derive “illegible?” LEGO, READ From what Latin verb with what meaning do we derive “amiable?” AMO, LOVE 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, in Ten Books
    www.e-rara.ch The architecture of Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, in ten books Vitruvius London, 1826 Bibliothek Werner Oechslin Shelf Mark: A04a ; app. 851 Persistent Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-19442 Life of Vitruvius. www.e-rara.ch Die Plattform e-rara.ch macht die in Schweizer Bibliotheken vorhandenen Drucke online verfügbar. Das Spektrum reicht von Büchern über Karten bis zu illustrierten Materialien – von den Anfängen des Buchdrucks bis ins 20. Jahrhundert. e-rara.ch provides online access to rare books available in Swiss libraries. The holdings extend from books and maps to illustrated material – from the beginnings of printing to the 20th century. e-rara.ch met en ligne des reproductions numériques d’imprimés conservés dans les bibliothèques de Suisse. L’éventail va des livres aux documents iconographiques en passant par les cartes – des débuts de l’imprimerie jusqu’au 20e siècle. e-rara.ch mette a disposizione in rete le edizioni antiche conservate nelle biblioteche svizzere. La collezione comprende libri, carte geografiche e materiale illustrato che risalgono agli inizi della tipografia fino ad arrivare al XX secolo. Nutzungsbedingungen Dieses Digitalisat kann kostenfrei heruntergeladen werden. Die Lizenzierungsart und die Nutzungsbedingungen sind individuell zu jedem Dokument in den Titelinformationen angegeben. Für weitere Informationen siehe auch [Link] Terms of Use This digital copy can be downloaded free of charge. The type of licensing and the terms of use are indicated in the title information for each document individually. For further information please refer to the terms of use on [Link] Conditions d'utilisation Ce document numérique peut être téléchargé gratuitement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey in Pictures Through Roman Religion
    A Journey in Pictures through Roman Religion By Ursula Kampmann, © MoneyMuseum What is god? As far as the Romans are concerned we think we know that all too well from our unloved Latin lessons: Jupiter, Juno, Minerva, the Roman Triad as well as the usual gods of the ancient world, the same as the Greek gods in name and effect. In fact, however, the roots of Roman religion lie much earlier, much deeper, in dark, prehistoric times ... 1 von 20 www.sunflower.ch How is god experienced? – In the way nature works A bust of the goddess Flora (= flowering), behind it blossom. A denarius of the Roman mint master C. Clodius Vestalis, 41 BC Roman religion emerged from the magical world of the simple farmer, who was speechless when faced with the miracles of nature. Who gave the seemingly withered trees new blossom after the winter? Which power made the grain of corn in the earth grow up to produce new grain every year? Which god prevented the black rust and ensured that the weather was fine just in time for the harvest? Who guaranteed safe storage? And which power was responsible for making it possible to divide up the corn so that it sufficed until the following year? Each individual procedure in a farmer's life was broken down into many small constituent parts whose success was influenced by a divine power. This divine power had to be invoked by a magic ritual in order to grant its help for the action. Thus as late as the imperial period, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 10 Literature Mini-Assessment Excerpt from Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene Ii
    Grade 10 Literature Mini-Assessment Excerpt from Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene ii by William Shakespeare This grade 10 mini-assessment is based on an excerpt from Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene ii by William Shakespeare and a video of the scene. This text is considered to be worthy of students’ time to read and also meets the expectations for text complexity at grade 10. Assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) will employ quality, complex texts such as this one. Questions aligned to the CCSS should be worthy of students’ time to answer and therefore do not focus on minor points of the text. Questions also may address several standards within the same question because complex texts tend to yield rich assessment questions that call for deep analysis. In this mini- assessment there are seven selected-response questions and one paper/pencil equivalent of technology enhanced items that address the Reading Standards listed below. Additionally, there is an optional writing prompt, which is aligned to both the Reading Standards for Literature and the Writing Standards. We encourage educators to give students the time that they need to read closely and write to the source. While we know that it is helpful to have students complete the mini-assessment in one class period, we encourage educators to allow additional time as necessary. Note for teachers of English Language Learners (ELLs): This assessment is designed to measure students’ ability to read and write in English. Therefore, educators will not see the level of scaffolding typically used in instructional materials to support ELLs—these would interfere with the ability to understand their mastery of these skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Faliscan Personal Names
    W. D. C. de Melo Faliscan Personal names The Indo-European system There are two types of names: a) names consisting of two stems, often praising the qualities of the person concerned: Πατρο-κλέης; these can be shortened (in either stem), but a suffix has to be added: Πάτρο-κλ-ος; b) names consisting of one stem, often nicknames, sometimes praising good qualities, but more often mocking bad characteristics. In the original system, a single name is enough: Greek Αἰσχύλος, Vedic Bh¯ımasena (name of a hero), Celtic Dumnor¯ıx. But in order to distinguish between people of the same name, the father’s name can be added; this is optional; cf: a) genitive: Greek Δημοσθένης Δημοσθένου, Old High German Hadubrant Hiltibrantes sunu; b) adjective: Greek Αἴας Τελαμώνιος, Old English Wulf Wonr´eding. Occasionally what began as a patronymic continues in a family; cf. the kings of Pylos: Νηλεύς, son Νέστωρ Νηλήϊος, grandson ᾿Αντίλοχος Νηλήϊος. This then becomes a clan name, cf. the mythical Τανταλίδαι or the Vedic singers K¯an. v¯as. The Latin system The Latin system is very different from the Indo-European system. Systems similar to the Latin one can be found in Faliscan, Oscan and Umbrian, but also in Etruscan. We are presumably dealing with a regional phenomenon. The full form of a Roman name can be seen in CIL I2 827: M (arcus) Herennius M (arci) f (ilius) Mae(cia tribu) Rufus. This consists of: praenomen, nomen (=nomen gentile / nomen gentilicium), genitive of father’s name + ‘son’, name of the tribe (ablative), cognomen. Usage: Cicero uses the combination praenomen + nomen + cognomen only in highly official contexts; praenomen + nomen or praenomen + cognomen is used in formal contexts; a single name is informal.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Supreme Principle of Morality'? in the Preface to His Best
    The Supreme Principle of Morality Allen W. Wood 1. What is ‘The Supreme Principle of Morality’? In the Preface to his best known work on moral philosophy, Kant states his purpose very clearly and succinctly: “The present groundwork is, however, nothing more than the search for and establishment of the supreme principle of morality, which already constitutes an enterprise whole in its aim and to be separated from every other moral investigation” (Groundwork 4:392). This paper will deal with the outcome of the first part of this task, namely, Kant’s attempt to formulate the supreme principle of morality, which is the intended outcome of the search. It will consider this formulation in light of Kant’s conception of the historical antecedents of his attempt. Our first task, however, must be to say a little about the meaning of the term ‘supreme principle of morality’. For it is not nearly as evident to many as it was to Kant that there is such a thing at all. And it is extremely common for people, whatever position they may take on this issue, to misunderstand what a ‘supreme principle of morality’ is, what it is for, and what role it is supposed to play in moral theorizing and moral reasoning. Kant never directly presents any argument that there must be such a principle, but he does articulate several considerations that would seem to justify supposing that there is. Kant holds that moral questions are to be decided by reason. Reason, according to Kant, always seeks unity under principles, and ultimately, systematic unity under the fewest possible number of principles (Pure Reason A298-302/B355-359, A645- 650/B673-678).
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea Berit Van Neste University of South Florida
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 4-12-2006 Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea Berit Van Neste University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Scholar Commons Citation Neste, Berit Van, "Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea" (2006). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3782 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea by Berit Van Neste A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Religious Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: James F. Strange, Ph.D. Paul G. Schneider, Ph.D. Michael J. Decker, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 12, 2006 Keywords: theology, philosophy, politics, patristic, medieval © Copyright 2006 , Berit Van Neste For Elizabeth and Calista Table of Contents Abstract ii Chapter 1 1 Introduction 1 Cicero’s Influence on Augustine 7 Chapter 2 13 Justice 13 Natural and Temporal Law 19 Commonwealth 34 Chapter 3 49 Just War 49 Chapter 4 60 Conclusion 60 References 64 i Cicero and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome
    Ancient Rome William E. Dunstan ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK ................. 17856$ $$FM 09-09-10 09:17:21 PS PAGE iii Published by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.rowmanlittlefield.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright ᭧ 2011 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All maps by Bill Nelson. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. The cover image shows a marble bust of the nymph Clytie; for more information, see figure 22.17 on p. 370. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dunstan, William E. Ancient Rome / William E. Dunstan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7425-6832-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-7425-6833-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-7425-6834-1 (electronic) 1. Rome—Civilization. 2. Rome—History—Empire, 30 B.C.–476 A.D. 3. Rome—Politics and government—30 B.C.–476 A.D. I. Title. DG77.D86 2010 937Ј.06—dc22 2010016225 ⅜ϱ ீThe paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/ NISO Z39.48–1992. Printed in the United States of America ................
    [Show full text]
  • On Unitarian Universalist Moral Duties: Looking Forward with Cicero and Kant
    On Unitarian Universalist Moral Duties: Looking Forward with Cicero and Kant Myriam Renaud I. Why Moral Duties? Aren‟t We Done With That Conversation? For the purposes of this paper, I will rely on the following definition of moral duty (or obligation): an action which is required (imperative) and which is guided by certain moral rules and principles. In every day language, we capture the concept of duty or obligation when we say things like, “I should [or „ought‟] to do this because it‟s the right thing to do,” or “I want to do right by so and so.” These ordinary expressions reflect the view that awareness of the rightness of an action may be enough to provide the impetus to carry through that action—namely, that “in acting from a motive attached to a moral principle,”—in acting on what we take to be the right thing to do—“the moral rightness of the action gives the agent reason for action” [Herman, 30]. Admittedly, the word alone—duty—is likely to cause unpleasant shivers to course down the spines of most Unitarian Universalists. It brings to mind something we have to do, something we‟d rather not do, something we‟re made to do, probably at the expense of some activity we would actually enjoy. But, if we push past the unpleasant shiver, we recognize that duty, or obligation, is tied to the moral structure which governs our lives and which we try to impart to our children both at home and in the religious education classes offered in our congregations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontifex Maximus
    bs_bs_banner Journal of Religious History Vol. ••, No. ••, •• 2016 doi: 10.1111/1467-9809.12400 ROALD DIJKSTRA AND DORINE VAN ESPELO Anchoring Pontifical Authority: A Reconsideration of the Papal Employment of the Title Pontifex Maximus It is a common assumption that the title of supreme priesthood or pontifex maximus is included in the official papal titulature, and it has been supposed that the Roman bishop adopted it from the Roman emperor in late antiquity. In fact, however, it was probably not until the fifteenth century that the designation was first used by the papacy, and it has continued to be part of papal representation ever since. The title was deeply rooted in the Roman imperial past. At several stages in papal history the papal agency felt the need to draw back (again) on this ancient, traditional title and managed to successfully (re-)introduce the title by anchoring it in the cultural biogra- phy of the papacy. Introduction Since Antiquity, the interplay between the Roman bishops and secular rulers has been subject to continuous transformation and renegotiation, as both groups continually reverted to established traditions in order to sustain legiti- macy and pre-eminence.1 At the same time, however, modes of representation had to be innovative in order to appeal to contemporary tastes, needs, and ex- pectations. Anchoring these novelties in tradition was a convenient means of implementing, and reinforcing, the desired effect, and tracing these processes of embedding the new in the familiar offers us the possibility of understanding cultural, political, and religious transformation. An outstanding example of this kind of “anchoring innovation” is that of Roman episcopal titulature, as can be 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciceronian Business Ethics Owen Goldin Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 11-1-2006 Ciceronian Business Ethics Owen Goldin Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. Studies in the History of Ethics (November 2006). Publisher link. © 2006 HistoryofEthics.org. Used with permission. Studies in the History of Ethics Ciceronian Bu siness Ethics Owen Goldin (Mar quette University) The teaching and practice of business must resist ethical compartmentalization. One engaged in business ought not check moral principles at the door and say “business is business,” for this is to pretend that when one is engaged in business, one is no longer a human being, with the rational nature, emotional constitution, and social bonds that are at the root of our ethical nature. Ethical standards apply to business as they do all aspects of human life. Nonetheless, making money is the goal of business, and more often than not, one is trying to take money from another, at the least possible cost. Such action is necessarily self-centered, if not selfish, and requires acting in a way that we would not want to see people act in all of their dealings with others, especially in regard to family, friends, and others with whom they have special social bonds. Granting that business practices are not compartmentalized against all ethical considerations, the fact that business demands maximization of profit entails that special rules apply. Determining what these are, in what circumstances they are less demanding than the ethical principles of everyday life, and in what circumstances they are more demanding, is the domain of business ethics, as a special domain of ethical philosophy.
    [Show full text]