DOCSLIB.ORG

Application APP202663: to Introduce the Moth Lathronympha Strigana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application APP202663: to Introduce the Moth Lathronympha Strigana Application Summary and Information for Submitters Application APP202663: to introduce the moth Lathronympha strigana and the leaf beetle Chrysolina abchasica as biological control agents for the weed tutsan Hypericum androsaemum Date Submissions Open: 1 December 2015 Application number: APP202663 An application to introduce the moth Lathronympha strigana and the Purpose: leaf beetle Chrysolina abchasica as biological control agents for the weed tutsan Hypericum androsaemum Applicant: Tutsan Action Group EPA Application contact: Sarah Fish www.epa.govt.nz 2 Application Summary and Submission Guidance Purpose of this document On 20 November 2015, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) received an application to release the moth Lathronympha strigana and the leaf beetle Chrysolina abchasica as biological control agents for the weed tutsan (Hypericum androsaemum). This application was submitted by the Tutsan Action Group, a community based consortium comprising over 100 farmers, regional council and Department of Conservation conservancies, and supported by the MPI Sustainable Farming Fund, Beef and Lamb New Zealand, the National Biocontrol Collective and Landcare Research. This application is being publicly notified to enable the public to comment on the proposed release and to put all relevant information before the decision makers. The purpose of this document is to provide: information about making a submission a summary of the application a summary of how the EPA will assess the application, and guidance on the submission process. Making a submission The submission period for this application will start on 1 December 2015 and will end at 5pm on 10 February 2016. In a submission you can provide information, make comments, and raise issues. In this way, you can contribute to the EPA decision making process on this application. We are particularly interested in hearing from you about the following matters: adverse effects, especially adverse effects not identified in the application1 positive effects, especially positive effects not identified in the application2. Further information on the purpose of submissions is available from the EPA website using the link below: www.epa.govt.nz/about-us/have-your-say What is a submission? A submission is a way you can have input into the decision making for an application you're interested in. When you write a submission, you set out your point of view for consideration by the decision-making committee. Anyone can make a submission, regardless of how much detail they are able to put in to it. In your submission, you can also request a hearing if you would like to discuss your views in person before the Decision-making Committee. Further information on submissions for an application is available from the EPA website using the link below: http://www.epa.govt.nz/about-us/have-your-say/Pages/what-is-submission.aspx 1 Adverse effects can include any risks and costs associated with release of the organisms. 2 Positive effects can include any benefits associated with release of the organisms. December 2015 3 Application Summary and Submission Guidance How to make a submission? The EPA website provides guidance and steps on how to make a submission. This is preferably done via the EPA submission form but may be sent as a letter or e-mail to the EPA. This information and the submission form can be accessed from the EPA website using the link below: http://www.epa.govt.nz/about-us/have-your-say/Pages/make-submission.aspx How can you get more information? If you have any questions, you can contact: The applicant directly with any question you may have on the technical information provided in the application or the information provided to the EPA. The applicant representative, Richard Hill, can be contacted by e-mail ([email protected]) or by phone (021 1376 919). The EPA with any question on the application and/or the submission processes. The application lead, Sarah Fish, can be contacted by e-mail ([email protected]) or by phone (04 474 5581). What happens after you make a submission? When the submission period closes, all submissions will be summarised and made available to the Decision- making Committee together with the EPA Staff Assessment Report. All submissions will be published on the EPA website. You can request that your contact details remain confidential, but other details of your submission may appear in discussion documents. Public hearing A hearing may be held to enable submitters to speak to the Decision-making Committee about their submissions. When you make a submission, and have indicated that you wish to be heard, you will be entitled to attend the public hearing, and you are entitled to bring witnesses who may speak to your submission. If you choose this option, you should provide the EPA with a list of the witnesses, their areas of expertise, and the elements of the submission or application they will talk to. You are also entitled to speak at the hearing in one of the three official languages of New Zealand English, Māori, or New Zealand Sign Language. Please advise the application lead by e-mail ([email protected]) or phone (04 474 5581) at least two weeks prior to the hearing start in order for the EPA to organise for an interpreter. At least two weeks prior to the hearing, both the applicant and submitter(s) need to provide the EPA with copies of any information they intend to present at the hearing. The decision A decision on the application will be made by the Decision-making Committee at the end of the consideration period. This will be made public on the EPA website. December 2015 4 Application Summary and Submission Guidance Application summary (prepared by the applicant) Application APP202663 seeks approval to introduce two insects as natural enemies of the weed tutsan. This biological control programme has three aims: To remove a significant proportion of tutsan foliage every year, directly reducing the shading effect that allows tutsan to outcompete desirable plant species. To reduce the capacity of tutsan plants to produce seeds that could be spread to new sites by birds. To destroy a significant proportion of the seed produced, limiting regeneration of the weed within existing sites. Tutsan, or Hypericum androsaemum, was probably introduced to New Zealand as an ornamental garden plant prior to 1870. By 1924 it was known as a weed, but it is only since the 1950s that it was seen as a real threat to hill country farming. Tutsan can be found from Kaitaia to Stewart Island. Its effects are worst in the central North Island where it is becoming more abundant. In the last 20 years, farmers around the Ruapehu district in have reported a rapid increase in the density of tutsan on pasture land. The annual cost of managing tutsan to maintain pastoral production in the district in 2012 was estimated at $990,000. Tutsan also affects conservation values, competing successfully with native vegetation in vulnerable places like stream margins and regenerating scrub, and it has the potential to become a more serious conservation weed in New Zealand. This application proposes the introduction of two agents, the moth Lathronympha strigana and the leaf beetle Chrysolina abchasica. The larvae of the moth feed on the leaves and stems of the tutsan plant in spring, and inhabit the fruit, consuming the seeds inside. The leaf beetle larvae graze on the leaves, and in large enough numbers cause defoliation. The potential benefits of biological control of tutsan include: reduced production losses in hill country pastures and forestry reduced invasion of un-infested sites and spread within existing sites reduced control costs to managers of productive and reserved land long-term mitigation of future damage to New Zealand's native ecosystems. Because introduced natural enemies of weeds become permanently established in the environment their effects, including any adverse effects, are widespread and persist from year to year. Introduced natural enemies must therefore be safe if this weed management tactic is to be environmentally acceptable. Significant adverse effects on environmental or economic values would occur if either control agent affected populations of valued native plants by: causing significant damage to non-native plant populations causing significant indirect impacts on native flora and fauna altering ecosystem relationships significantly. Tutsan belongs to the family Hypericaceae. There are four native species in this family. The host range testing presented in the application shows that native plant species will not be at significant risk from the moth or leaf beetle. There are 14 other exotic Hypericum species present in New Zealand. Some may be December 2015 5 Application Summary and Submission Guidance susceptible to incidental damage, but information presented in the application suggests this damage is unlikely to be economically or ecologically significant. No other adverse environmental, economic, cultural or social effects are considered significant. The data from the host range tests, an assessment of the beneficial and adverse effects of the proposal, and the results of consultation are summarised in the application. The data on which this application is based can be found on the Landcare Research website at: http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/science/plants-animals-fungi/plants/weeds/biocontrol/approvals/current- applications. December 2015 6 Application Summary and Submission Guidance Assessment of the application EPA staff assessment of the application Following the close of submissions, EPA staff will complete an assessment of the matters to be considered, using the information in the application, from submitters, and other readily available sources. This Staff Assessment Report will be published on the EPA website and will assist the Decision-making Committee with the consideration of the application. Consideration of the application In considering the application, the Decision-making Committee must take into account a range of matters set out in the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act 1996.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISSUE 77 / AUG 2016 Weed Biocontrol WHAT’S NEW?
    ISSUE 77 / AUG 2016 Weed Biocontrol WHAT’S NEW? Highlights • THREE NEW AGENTS APPROVED FOR TWO WEEDS • SMUT FOR TRADESCANTIA SOON • MORE EVIDENCE OF RAGWORT BIOCONTROL SUCCESS Tradescantia yellow leaf spot Robert Barreto Contents Bristly Dairy Farm Dilemma BRISTLY DAIRY FARM DILEMMA 2 COMPARING RAGWORT THEN Dairy farms around the North Island are struggling to keep pastures clean as another WITH NOW: PART ONE 4 weed, yellow bristle brass (Setaria pumila), is making its presence felt. Yellow bristle grass (YBG) is one of eight Setaria species found in New Zealand, and while not all of them are THREE NEW AGENTS APPROVED considered weeds, S. pumila has become a big problem, particularly in Taranaki, Waikato, FOR TWO WEEDS 6 South Auckland and the Bay of Plenty. Recent data suggests a possible hybrid origin for many plants commonly referred to as YBG, and it appears that this form, which may have SMUT FOR TRADESCANTIA SOON 7 recently arisen in New Zealand, is extremely weedy. SPRING ACTIVITIES 8 Originally from southern Asia, YBG has spread throughout Europe, Africa, North America and Australia. It was most likely brought accidentally to New Zealand as a contaminant WHO’S WHO IN BIOLOGICAL in grass seed. As the name suggests, YBG has a bristly seed head which attaches easily CONTROL OF WEEDS? 10 to the hair of animals and can be moved between farms in feed such as hay. The loss of grass production on dairy farms due to the presence of YBG has been estimated at around FURTHER READING 12 20%, which lowers farm productivity considerably.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. GEO-Tag Der Artenvielfalt Griffner Schlossberg Und Griffner See, Kärnten 11./12
    ©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Carinthia II B 1947114. Jahrgang B Seiten 537-590 B Klagenfurt 2004 537 6. GEO-Tag der Artenvielfalt Griffner Schlossberg und Griffner See, Kärnten 11./12. Juni 2004 Von Christian WIESER, Christian K0MP0SCH, Klaus KRAINER & Johann WAGNER Schlagworte: Keywords: GEO-Tag, Artenvielfalt, Griffner Schlossberg, Griffner See, Kärnten. GEO-day, biodiversity, Griffner Schlossberg, Griffner See, Zusammenfassung: Carinthia, Austria. Am 6. GEO-Tag der Artenvielfalt (11.-12. Juni 2004) waren insgesamt mehr als 100 Wissenschafter und Hobbyforscher beteiligt. Während der 24-stün- Summary: digen Erhebung am Griffner Schlossberg und Griffner See (Bezirk Völker- More than 100 scientists and ama- markt, Kärnten) wurden 2398 Arten aus 34 Pflanzen-, Tier- und Pilzgruppen teur researchers were involved in nachgewiesen. the 6th GEO-day of biodiversity, Die Marktgemeinde Griffen ist damit nicht nur im bundesland- sondern auch which took place on the 11* to 12th im mitteleuropaweiten Vergleich als hot-spot der Biodiversität bezeichnen. June 2004 in the Griffner castle- Aus naturschutzfachlicher Sicht erlangen die Lebensgemeinschaften der mountain and lake. During a period Felswände, Höhlen, Laubwälder und Verlandungszonen hohe Bedeutung. of 24 hours 2349 species of 34 plant-, Bemerkenswert ist der Erstnachweis einer Sackspinne für Österreich, zu- animal- and fungus-groups could be dem können 8 Schmetterlings-, 4 Spinnenarten sowie eine Wanzenart erst- recorded. Due to this high number mals für Kärnten genannt werden! of species the district of Griffen is Auch die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit kann durch das hohe Engagement der Ge- revealed as a hot-spot of biodiver- meinde, die umfangreichen Schulaktionen und die enge Zusammenarbeit sity with national and central-euro- mit der Presse als voller Erfolg bezeichnet werden.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths and Management of a Grassland Reserve: Regular Mowing and Temporary Abandonment Support Different Species
    Biologia 67/5: 973—987, 2012 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-012-0095-9 Moths and management of a grassland reserve: regular mowing and temporary abandonment support different species Jan Šumpich1,2 &MartinKonvička1,3* 1Biological Centre CAS, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31,CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2Česká Bělá 212,CZ-58261 Česká Bělá, Czech Republic 3Faculty of Sciences, University South Bohemia, Branišovská 31,CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Abstract: Although reserves of temperate seminatural grassland require management interventions to prevent succesional change, each intervention affects the populations of sensitive organisms, including insects. Therefore, it appears as a wise bet-hedging strategy to manage reserves in diverse and patchy manners. Using portable light traps, we surveyed the effects of two contrasting management options, mowing and temporary abandonment, applied in a humid grassland reserve in a submountain area of the Czech Republic. Besides of Macrolepidoptera, we also surveyed Microlepidoptera, small moths rarely considered in community studies. Numbers of individiuals and species were similar in the two treatments, but ordionation analyses showed that catches originating from these two treatments differed in species composition, management alone explaining ca 30 per cent of variation both for all moths and if split to Marcolepidoptera and Microlepidoptera. Whereas a majority of macrolepidopteran humid grassland specialists preferred unmown sections or displayed no association with management, microlepidopteran humid grassland specialists contained equal representation of species inclining towards mown and unmown sections. We thus revealed that even mown section may host valuable species; an observation which would not have been detected had we considered Macrolepidoptera only.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalser Dorfertal, Osttirol)
    Nationalpark Hohe Tauern Tag der Artenvielfalt 2007 (Kalser Dorfertal, Osttirol) Patrick Gros Wolfgang Dämon Christine Medicus © Patrick Gros - Juli 2007 2007 2 3 Nationalpark Hohe Tauern Tag der Artenvielfalt 2007 (Kalser Dorfertal, Osttirol) Endbericht über die Ergebnisse und Diskussion der erhobenen Daten auf der Basis der Biodiversitätsdatenbank des Nationalparks Hohe Tauern Patrick Gros Wolfgang Dämon Christine Medicus unter Mitarbeit von Heribert Köckinger, Andreas Maletzky, Christian Schröck, Oliver Stöhr, Claudia Taurer-Zeiner, Roman Türk 2007 Gefördert aus Nationalparkmitteln des Bundesministeriums für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft sowie der Länder Salzburg, Kärnten und Tirol. Herausgeber: Haus der Natur Museum für darstellende und angewandte Naturkunde Museumsplatz 5 A-5020 Salzburg, Österreich Auftraggeber: Verein Sekretariat Nationalparkrat Hohe Tauern Kirchplatz 2 A-9971 Matrei in Osttirol, Österreich Zitiervorschlag: GROS, P., DÄMON, W. und MEDICUS C. (2007): Nationalpark Hohe Tauern - Tag der Artenvielfalt 2007 (Kalser Dorfertal, Osttirol). Unveröffentlichter Endbericht im Auftrag des Nationalparks Hohe Tauern. Haus der Natur, Salzburg: 66 Seiten. 4 Inhalt Zusammenfassung ....................................................................................... 5 Einleitung ...................................................................................................... 6 Untersuchungsgebiet .................................................................................... 8 Ergebnis – Übersicht
    [Show full text]
  • Rooksbury Mill Local Drawn: Ian Moodie Dept: GIS Nature Reserve Compartment Boundaries Doc: 2 • Cut Banks Yearly to End of the Season and Remove Arisings
    APPENDIX I Compartment Map Descriptions Work Schedule Site based Risk Assessment Task based Risk Assessment Site Inspection Form 1 - 5 2a 7 6 h t Pa 1 © 11 C r o w n 3 C 18 o p y r i g h t . A 8 l l 2 r i g h t 17 s r e 9 s e r v e d . 10 T e s t V 4 16 a l l e y 12 B E o N A 14 L r 2b o S u W O g L h BAR C 13 o u n c i l 1 15 0 0 0 2 4 2 9 5 . 2 0 1 0 Scale: NTS @ A4 P Date: 24th December 2010 Map Showing Rooksbury Mill Local Drawn: Ian Moodie Dept: GIS Nature Reserve Compartment Boundaries Doc: 2 • Cut banks yearly to end of the season and remove arisings. Cut on circular rotation - 1 third of bank per year (in accordance to EA regulations on flood prevention) Compartment 1 Mill Lake • Areas between lakes become ‘quiet’ areas with no public access • Where possible, soften edges of lakes by decreasing gradient. • Cut aquatic weed three times yearly in April, June, August or as required and remove from site. • Leave gap between paths and lakes • Cut grass to different swards heights. Mow and remove arisings. Where no formal path, cut grass as needed to maintain public access. Divide area into 3 parallel zones. Cut central area Compartment Improved adjacent to paths twice yearly (first cut in March, second in 2a pasture October).
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic Versus Introduced Species in North America
    insects Article Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic versus Introduced Species in North America Todd M. Gilligan 1,*, John W. Brown 2 and Joaquín Baixeras 3 1 USDA-APHIS-PPQ-S&T, 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA 2 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA; [email protected] 3 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Carrer Catedràtic José Beltran, 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 August 2020; Accepted: 29 August 2020; Published: 3 September 2020 Simple Summary: The family Tortricidae includes approximately 11,500 species of small moths, many of which are economically important pests worldwide. A large number of tortricid species have been inadvertently introduced into North America from Eurasia, and many have the potential to inflict considerable negative economic and ecological impacts. Because native species behave differently than introduced species, it is critical to distinguish between the two. Unfortunately, this can be a difficult task. In the past, many tortricids discovered in North America were assumed to be the same as their Eurasian counterparts, i.e., Holarctic. Using DNA sequence data, morphological characters, food plants, and historical records, we analyzed the origin of 151 species of Tortricidae present in North America. The results indicate that the number of Holarctic species has been overestimated by at least 20%. We also determined that the number of introduced tortricids in North America is unexpectedly high compared other families, with tortricids accounting for approximately 23–30% of the total number of moth and butterfly species introduced to North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 15 (3/4) : 164-178 ; 30.IV. 1993 ISSN 0342-7536 New and little known Grapholitini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from the Mediterranean area Leif Aarvik * and Ole Karsholt ** * Nyborgvn. 19 A, N-1430 As Norway ** Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Kobennhavn 0, Denmark Summary Two new species of Cydia Hübner, from Greece (C. johanssoni sp.n.) and Tunisia (C. tunisiana sp.n.), and a new species of Lathronympha Meyrick from Greece (L. christenseni sp.n.) are described. The female genitalia of Dichrorampha letarfensis Gibeaux and the male genitalia of Cydia alienana Caradja are figured for the first time. A note on Cydia plumbiferana Staudinger is given. Zusammenfassung Zwei neue Arten der Gattung Cydia Hübner aus Griechenland (C johanssoni sp.n.) und Tunesien (C. tunisiana sp.n.) und eine neue Art der Gattung Lathro- nympha Meyrick aus Griechenland (L. christenseni sp.n.) werden beschrieben. Die weiblichen Genitalien von Dichrorampha letarfensis Gibeaux und die männlichen Genitalien von Cydia alienana Caradja werden erstmals abge- bildet. Eine Bemerkung zu Cydia plumbiferana Staudinger wird angefügt. Résumé Description de deux espèces nouvelles de Cydia Hübner (C. johanssoni sp.n. de Grèce et C. tunisiana sp.n. de Tunisie) et d'une espèce nouvelle de Lathro- nympha Meyrick (L. christenseni sp.n. de Grèce). Les genitalia femelles de Dichrorampha letarfensis Gibeaux et les genitalia mâles de Cydia alienana Caradja sont figurés pour la première fois. Avec une notice sur Cydia plumbi- ferana Staudinger. Introduction - Identification work on Tortricidae : Olethreutinae Grapholitini in the collections of the Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen (ZMUC) revealed undescribed species belonging to the genera Cydia 164 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Hübner and Lathronympha Meyrick.
    [Show full text]
  • Giornale Di Zoologia
    ISSN 0370 - 4327 GIORNALE DI ZOOLOGIA PUBLISHED Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria CREA Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification Volume CI 101TERZA SERIE Rerum natura nusquam magis quam in minimis tota. PLINIO F I R E N Z E - 2 0 1 8 TIPOGRAFIA COPPINI I - Blank Page II - Blank Page ISSN 0370 - 4327 GIORNALE DI ZOOLOGIA PUBLISHED Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria CREA Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification Volume CI 101TERZA SERIE Rerum natura nusquam magis quam in minimis tota. PLINIO F I R E N Z E - 2 0 1 8 TIPOGRAFIA COPPINI Journal of Zoology Founded by Antonio Berlese, Firenze, 1903 Published by CREA Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (formerly: Istituto Sperimentale per la Zoologia Agraria, Firenze) Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria Editor-in-Chief Roberto Nannelli Firenze, Italy Associate Editors Sauro Simoni Pio Federico Roversi Firenze, Italy Firenze, Italy Managing Editor Donatella Goggioli Firenze, Italy Editorial Board Ramon Albajes Giacinto Germinara Hervé Jactel Peter Schausberger Lleida, Spain Foggia, Italy Cestas, France Vienna, Austria Miguel Angel Altieri Andrew Paul Gutierrez Mariusz Lewandowski Stephan Scheurer Berkeley, USA Berkeley, USA Warszawa, Poland Berlin, Germany Sebastiano Barbagallo Keith M. Harris Francois Lieutier Thomas Schröder Catania, Italy Ripley, Woking, England Orleans, France Braunschweig, Germany Andrea Binazzi Sherif Hassan Evert E. Lindquist Ward Strong Firenze, Italy Darmstat, Germany Ottawa, Canada Veron, Canada Stefano Colazza Axel Hausmann Pietro Luciano Eustachio Tarasco Palermo, Italy München, Germany Sassari, Italy Bari, Italy Piero Cravedi Claudio Ioriatti Manuel Mota Stefano Turillazzi Piacenza, Italy S.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF-Files (Basierend Auf Scans) Her­Un­Ter­Ge­Laden Wer­Den Können.] 29 (3): 127–148
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo Jahr/Year: 2009 Band/Volume: 30 Autor(en)/Author(s): Nässig Wolfgang A. Artikel/Article: Künstliche Sexuallockstoffe in der Faunistik: Ergebnisse einer Studie an Wicklern in Hessen (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) 3. Systematischer Teil: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae 31-76 Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 30 (1/2): 31–76 (2009) 31 Künstliche Sexuallockstoffe in der Faunistik: Ergebnisse einer Studie an Wicklern in Hessen (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) 3. Systematischer Teil: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae1 Wolfgang A. Nässig Dr. Wolfgang A. Nässig, Entomologie II, Forschungsinstitut und Museum Senckenberg, Senckenberganlage 25, D­60325 Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland; [email protected] Zusammenfassung: 55 Arten von Tortricidae: Ole threu ti­ Ar chips crataegana, A. xylosteana, Adoxophyes ora na, Bactra nae werden aus Hessen gemeldet, die 1981/1982 im Rahmen lan ce a la na, Phiaris mi ca na, Pseu do her me ni as abie ta na, einer Diplomarbeit mittels Phe ro mon klebefallen mit künst­ Epi no tia solandriana, Zei ra phe ra iser ta na, Epi ble ma scu tu­ li chen Sexualduft kö dern und Licht fang in Hes sen, Rhein­ la na, En ar mo nia for mo sa na (already published by Krause Main­Gebiet, bei Mühlheim am Main nachge wie sen wur den. 1987 and Näs sig & Thomas 1991a), Cydia fu ne bra na [sic!], Die folgenden 6 Arten (aus Nässig 2008 und die ser Arbeit) Cy. jan thinana, Cy . lobarzewskii (the last 3 species already sind ver mut lich faunistische Erstnach wei se für Hessen (ge­ pub lished in 1991), Cy .
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    Nota lepid. 15 (3/4) : 164-178 ; 30.IV. 1993 ISSN 0342-7536 New and little known Grapholitini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from the Mediterranean area Leif Aarvik * and Ole Karsholt ** * Nyborgvn. 19 A, N-1430 As Norway ** Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Kobennhavn 0, Denmark Summary Two new species of Cydia Hübner, from Greece (C. johanssoni sp.n.) and Tunisia (C. tunisiana sp.n.), and a new species of Lathronympha Meyrick from Greece (L. christenseni sp.n.) are described. The female genitalia of Dichrorampha letarfensis Gibeaux and the male genitalia of Cydia alienana Caradja are figured for the first time. A note on Cydia plumbiferana Staudinger is given. Zusammenfassung Zwei neue Arten der Gattung Cydia Hübner aus Griechenland (C johanssoni sp.n.) und Tunesien (C. tunisiana sp.n.) und eine neue Art der Gattung Lathro- nympha Meyrick aus Griechenland (L. christenseni sp.n.) werden beschrieben. Die weiblichen Genitalien von Dichrorampha letarfensis Gibeaux und die männlichen Genitalien von Cydia alienana Caradja werden erstmals abge- bildet. Eine Bemerkung zu Cydia plumbiferana Staudinger wird angefügt. Résumé Description de deux espèces nouvelles de Cydia Hübner (C. johanssoni sp.n. de Grèce et C. tunisiana sp.n. de Tunisie) et d'une espèce nouvelle de Lathro- nympha Meyrick (L. christenseni sp.n. de Grèce). Les genitalia femelles de Dichrorampha letarfensis Gibeaux et les genitalia mâles de Cydia alienana Caradja sont figurés pour la première fois. Avec une notice sur Cydia plumbi- ferana Staudinger. Introduction - Identification work on Tortricidae : Olethreutinae Grapholitini in the collections of the Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen (ZMUC) revealed undescribed species belonging to the genera Cydia 164 Hübner and Lathronympha Meyrick.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Exploitation of Sitka Spruce Plantations: Impacts of Management on Bats and Nocturnal Invertebrates
    Bat exploitation of Sitka Spruce plantations: Impacts of management on bats and nocturnal invertebrates Lucinda Kirkpatrick Biological and Environmental Sciences School of Natural Sciences University of Stirling October 2016 i Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis has been completed by myself, and it embodies the results of my own research. Where appropriate, I have acknowledged the nature and extent of work carried out in collaboration with others. ……………………………………………………………………. Lucinda Kirkpatrick ii Summary Plantations are widespread throughout temperate regions, and the area of plantation land cover is predicted to get larger in the future. Interest in ensuring sustainable plantation management is also growing, as it is increasingly recognised that productive areas should play a role in biodiversity conservation. Plantation landscapes can comprise the majority of forested cover in some countries, but taxon-specific guidance can be lacking, due to plantations often being under surveyed. Therefore, despite substantial incentives existing to ensure that plantations meet various ecological criteria, plantation managers lack the information necessary to implement effective management plans. Many bat species have undergone widespread declines in recent decades, attributed to habitat loss and fragmentation, particularly of forested habitat. In many temperate countries, historical deforestation has resulted in very low native tree cover, and subsequently, considerable replanting with non-native commercial coniferous plantations has taken place. Species specific habitat surveys have often demonstrated avoidance of conifer plantations by bats, which has been attributed to a lack of roosts and low invertebrate prey abundance. Furthermore, widespread lepidopteran declines have been partly attributed to afforestation with non-native conifer, but moth associations with commercial coniferous plantations are usually only studied for pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrian Bennett
    HIGH BATTS 2013 Front cover photograph: Male Kestrel by Brian Darbyshire 2012 HIGH BATTS Annual Report 2013 Published by High Batts Nature Reserve 2014 1 © copyright High Batts Nature Reserve 2014, c/o Chair of the Trustees: Colin E Slator, Broadacres, Kirby Hill, Boroughbridge YO51 9DH This publication is copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the Publisher. The editorial team thanks the following for providing illustrations: • Maps of Reserve and Recording Area on inside covers by Peter Hills • Title page drawing by Robert Adams of a Reed Warbler recorded at High Batts in 2013 • Photographs by Brian Darbyshire or as attributed Published by High Batts Nature Reserve Charity number 1151676 Compiled and edited by Alwin Knowles, Colin Slator, Patricia Rumbold and Peter Hills. Printed by North Yorkshire Document Management Centre Northallerton 2 Contents Page Foreword 4 Trustees, officers and recorders 6 Chairman’s Report 8 Pictures from 2013 11 Reserve Management Report 15 Reports for: Kingdom FUNGI and PLANTAE Fungi (Adrian Bennett) 17 Ferns and Flowering Plants (Robert Adams) 23 Mosses and Liverworts (no report) Kingdom ANIMALIA Butterflies (Will Rich) 24 Other Insects and Invertebrates (Jim Jobe) 30 Checklist of the beetles of HB and its 34 environs- Part 2 Moths (Jill Warwick) 39 Damselflies and Dragonflies (Stephen Worwood) 42 Lampreys, Fish, Amphibians and Reptiles (Barry 44 Slaymaker) Birds (Ann Macintosh) 45 Bird Ringing Report (Jill Warwick) 58 Mammals (Ray O’Donnell) 62 General Information about the Reserve 66 Maps of Reserve and Recording Area Inside covers 3 Foreword We are delighted to be able to bring you the latest annual report from High Batts Nature Reserve, recording another year of significant achievement in the “on the ground” management of the Reserve and the administrative organisation which supports it.
    [Show full text]