Galactosemia Screening Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Henrik Simonsen, MD, PhD Denmark Biochemistry
Galactitol UDP-Glucose GALE
Galactose GALK Galactose-1-P GALT UDP-Galactose
Galactonate Glucose-1-P
Glycolysis Glycogen Fragmentation of galactose 1-phosphate
79 100
80 y t i s
n 60 e 97 t n I e v i t
a 40 l e R
20 139 79 259 241 97 0 100 150 200 250 m/z 139 Fragmentation patterns
79 97 100 100
80 80 y y t i t i s s
n 60 Fructose 1-P n 60 e e 97 Galactose 1-P t t n n I I
Fructose 6-P e e v
v Glucose 1-P i i t t
a 40
a 40 l l Glucose 6-P e e R R
20 20 139 259 79 241 139 241 259 0 0 100 150 200 250 m/z 100 150 200 250 m/z
79 79 97 97 Galactose 1-P Fructose 1-P Retrospective screening
2.0
1.5
1.0 ratio (m/z 79 / m/z 97)
0.5 Galactosemia intensity Q188R/N314D Reference Ion
0.0 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hexose monophosphates (mmol/L) Analytical procedure
Dried blood spot sample
Extract acetonitrile:water
Pellet debris
Transfer Dilute 1:10
m/z 259>79
Linear regression
In-house retesting if elevated Gal 1-P Participation
Newborns in Denmark 100%
Screened Not screened PKU, CH, Toxoplasmosis 1% 99%
Informed consent No information Supplemental MS/MS Screening 75% 24%
Opt in Opt out 74% 1%
Amino acids Gal 1-P Acylcarnitines Sampling time
20000
15000
10000
5000
0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 Diagnostic Algorithm
MS/MS Gal 1-P
Normal Borderline Elevated <1.2 mmol/L 1.2-2.0 mmol/L >2.0 mmol/L
Resample
Enzymatic GALT genotype Gal 1-P Q188R, N314D
Normal Elevated Sequencing 0-3 micg/mL >3 micg/mL Analytical performance
• Measured samples 9613
• Technical redeterminations 94 = 1%
• Confirmatory redeterminations 29 = 0,3% Screening results
Gal 1-P Gal 1-P Mut1 Mut2 Comment 4,8 1282 Q188R R51L 1,3 7 Q188R N314D 1,9 124 R67C N314D 1,9 0 Q188R N314D 2,3 43 Q188R N314D 1,2 nd N314D N314D Neg. Benedict 1,4 0 N314D N314D 1,5 nd N314D N314D Normal second filterpaper screen 1,7 15 N314D N314D 1,4 1 wt N314D 1,5 1 wt N314D 1,6 0 wt N314D 1,7 nd wt N314D 1,4 0 wt wt 1,5 2 wt wt 1,6 1 wt wt 1,8 1 wt wt 2,0 1 wt wt Gal 1-P levels
5
4
3
2 Gal 1-P (mmol/L)
1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 C/C C/D D/D D/W W/W Genotypes
Classical Duarte Wild type Sum Classical 1 4 0 5 Duarte 4 4 8 Wild type 5 5 Sum 18 Diagnostic Performance
• Screened 96.000 (est.) • Gal 1-P >2.0 mmol/L 1 patient + 2 • Gal 1-P 1.2-2.0 mmol/L 15
• Clinical incidence: 1 (2 y study period) 1:60.000 (42 y period)
• Sensitivity: 100% (1:1)
• FPR 1:6.400 (0,02%) - 1:32.000 (0,003%)
• PPV: 6% (1:18) - 33% (1:3) Conclusions
• MS/MS is able to detect even weak abnormalities in the GALT gene.
• High sensitivity
• Low false positive rate
• Internal standard is recommended Fragmentation patterns
79 97 100 100
80 80 y y t i t i s s
n 60 Fructose 1-P n 60 e e 97 Galactose 1-P t t n n I I
Fructose 6-P e e v
v Glucose 1-P i i t t
a 40
a 40 l l Glucose 6-P e e R R
20 20 139 259 79 241 139 241 259 0 0 100 150 200 250 m/z 100 150 200 250 m/z
79 79 97 97 Galactose 1-P Fructose 1-P KristinKristin SkogstrandSkogstrand UlrichUlrich GlümerGlümer JensenJensen ErnstErnst ChristensenChristensen MarianneMarianne SchwartzSchwartz AllanAllan LundLund DavidDavid HougaardHougaard NielsNiels JacobJacob BrandtBrandt BentBent NørgaardNørgaard--PedersenPedersen FlemmingFlemming SkovbySkovby