DOCSLIB.ORG

Displacement and Returns to Sinjar and Al-Ba'aj Districts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Displacement and Returns to Sinjar and Al-Ba'aj Districts DTMDISPLACEMENT EMERGENCY AND RETURNS TO SINJAR TRACKINGAND AL-BA’AJ DISTRICTS DISPLACEMENT AND RETURNS TO PERIOD COVERED: SINJAR AND AL-BA’AJ DISTRICTS 30 OCTOBER TO 21 NOVEMBER 2020 *All charts/graphs in this document show total figures for the period of 8 June to 21 November 2020. Between 30 October and 21 November, DTM tracked 6,287 individuals (1,191 40,724 families) returning to Sinjar and Al-Ba’aj districts in Iraq’s Ninewa Governorate. 76% 24% This brings the total number of individuals who have taken this route to 40,724 INDIVIDUALS Returnees Out-of-camp (7,650 families) since data collection commenced on 8 June 2020. IDPs 7,650 In this reporting period, the average number of daily individual arrivals was 258 to Sinjar and 16 to Al-Ba’aj. In this period, the daily number of arrivals to FAMILIES Sinjar is higher than the overall daily average since 8 June (226), while the daily Moved to Sinjar and 91% 9% average number of arrivals to Al-Ba’aj is consistent with overall average since Al-Ba’aj districts to Sinjar to Al-Ba’aj 8 June (21). Of those individuals who returned between 30 October and 21 November, a 81% 18% <1% total of 5,925 were recorded in Sinjar (94%) and 362 were recorded in Al-Ba’aj <1% (6%) – broadly consistent with the rates of individuals’ districts of arrival since from Sulaymaniyah from Dahuk from Ninewa from Erbil 8 June (91% to Sinjar and 9% to Al-Ba’aj). In almost all assessed locations, all individuals were identified as Yazidis, with this group composing 97 per cent of Mostly from Zakho Mostly from Al- Mostly from Mostly from all individuals that have returned to Sinjar and Al-Ba’aj since 8 June. Additionally, and Sumel districts Shikhan district Erbil district Sulaymaniyah district three per cent of all individuals have been identified as Kurd Sunni Muslims, and less than one per cent have been identified as Kurd Shia Muslims or Arab Sunni Muslims. The majority of these latter three groups were recorded as arriving 71% 29% to Sinjar District’s sub-districts of Markaz Sinjar and Qaeyrrawan, and Al-Ba’aj from camp settings from out-of-camp settings District’s sub-district of Al-Qahtaniya. The most common sub-district of arrival was Al-Shamal with 3,633 individ- uals (58%), followed by Markaz Sinjar with 1,279 individuals (20%). Together, INDIVIDUALS BY SUB-DISTRICT OF ARRIVAL these two sub-districts comprise 78 per cent of all individuals recorded as having arrived to Sinjar and Al-Ba’aj since data collection commenced on 8 June. 19,971 Otherwise, 1,013 individuals arrived to the sub-district of Qaeyrrawan (16%) and 362 arrived to Al-Qahtaniyah (6%). +3,633 11,874 Of those individuals identified as returning between 30 October and 21 +1,279 November, 5,345 were recorded as returnees (85%), while the remaining 942 16,338 5409 3,465 were recorded as out-of-camp IDPs (15%). This represents a deviation from the 10,595 +1013 +362 5 4396 overall proportion of individuals having been identified as returnees (76%) and 3,103 5 out-of-camp IDPs (24%) since 8 June. Al-Qahtaniya Markaz Al-Ba'aj Al-Shamal Markaz Sinjar Qaeyrrawan Additionally, between 30 October and 21 November, a total of 5,272 indi- Al-Ba'aj Sinjar viduals were recorded as departing from Dahuk Governorate (84%) – which is similar to the rates of individuals having departed from there since 8 June 8 June – 29 October 30 October – 21 November Grand Total (81%). As with all previous rounds, between 30 October and 21 November, the majority of individuals from Dahuk were recorded as coming from the districts Map 1. Population Movements to Sinjar and Al-Ba’aj districts of Sumel (47% of all individuals) and Zakho (33%). The remaining individuals Zakho from Dahuk Governorate were recorded as coming from the districts of Amedi Dahuk Amedi Sumel Dahuk Mergasur (2% of all individuals) and Dahuk (2% of all individuals). Additionally, between 30 October and 21 November, a further 931 individ- Telafar Al-Shikhan Akre uals were recorded as having come from within Ninewa (15%), mainly from Tilkaif Soran Choman Al-Shikhan (13% of all individuals), and the rest came from and Sinjar and Tilkaif Shaqlawa (both 1%). This proportion (15%) of individuals recorded as having come from Al-Hamdaniya Erbil Rania Pshdar Sinjar Ninewa between 30 October and 21 November is broadly consistent with the Erbil Mosul Koisnjaq overall proportion of individuals recorded as having come from there since 8 Ninewa Dokan Sharbazher June (18%). Otherwise, 65 individuals arrived from Sulaymaniyah Governorate Makhmur Al-Ba'aj Sulaymaniyah (1%), while 19 individuals were recorded as arriving from Erbil Governorate Dabes Sulaymaniya Hatra (<1% of all individuals). Number of individuals Kirkuk Al-Shirqat To Al-Ba’aj Chamchamal 3 - 1,374 Kirkuk Since 8 June, almost all individuals have been recorded as having departed from To Sinjar 1,375 - 10,575 District boundary Al-Hawiga Daquq 10,576 - 18,673 Sumel (49% of all individuals), Zakho (28%), and Al-Shikhan districts (14%). Governorate boundary Tooz Kalar Anbar Baiji Al-Ka'im Ra'ua Haditha Salah Al-Din Tikrit INDIVIDUALS BY DISTRICT OF DEPARTURE 20,047 8 June – 29 October 30 October – 21 November Grand Total +2,974 11,579 +2,069 5,778 +812 734 909 658 28 3 490 10 223 10 8 205 12 +116 +113 +73 +46 +19 +39 Amedi Dahuk Sumel Zakho Al-Shikhan Mosul Sinjar Telafar Tilkaif Akre Erbil Soran Shaqlawa Sulaymaniyah Sharbazher Dahuk Ninewa Erbil Sulaymaniyah Between 30 October and 21 November, of the 5,925 individuals who arrived Between 30 October and 21 November, increases were recorded in the number to Sinjar District, 4,990 came from Dahuk Governorate (84%), while 851 came of individuals who had been living in camp settings in their previous districts of from within Ninewa (14%), 65 came from Sulaymaniyah (1%), and 19 came from displacement. The total number of individuals now in Sinjar and Al-Ba’aj who have Sulaymaniyah (1%). Additionally, of the 362 individuals who arrived to Al-Ba’aj come from camp settings within Sumel is now 13,475 (up from 11,809), while District, 282 came from Dahuk (78%) and 98 came from within Ninewa (22%). Zakho’s is 9,690 (up from 7,875), and Al-Shikhan’s is 4,787 (up from 4,074). Furthermore, during the same period, a total of 4,314 individuals were recorded In addition, since 8 June, the total number of individuals who have come from as coming from camp settings (69%), while the remaining 1,973 individuals came out-of-camp settings within Sumel is now 6,572 (up from 5,264), while Zakho’s is from out-of-camp settings (31%). This is broadly consistent with the rates of indi- now 1,889 (up from 1,635), and Al-Shikhan’s is 991 (up from 892). viduals coming from different settings since 8 June, as follows: 28,718 individuals have arrived from camp settings (71%) while 12,006 individuals have arrived from out-of-camp settings (29%). INDIVIDUALS BY TYPE OF LOCATION IN PREVOUS DISTRICT OF DISPLACEMENT (CAMP/OUT-OF-CAMP) 8 June – 29 October 30 October – 21 November Grand Total 13,475 + 1,666 9,690 +1,815 6,572 4,787 +1,308 +713 1,889 991 614 648 909 490 +254 +99 44 86 223 28 3 52 153 12 10 4 11 10 8 15 +116 +113 +19 +73 +46 +4 +35 Camp Out of Camp Out of Camp Out of Out of Out of Out of Camp Out of Out of Out of Camp Out of Camp Out of Out of Out of Camp Out of Camp Out of Out of camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp camp Al-Shikhan Amedi Dahuk Erbil Mosul Sinjar Sum el Telafar Tilkaif Zakho Sulaymaniyah Sha rbazher Soran Chamchamal Akre Sha qlawa Dokan NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL ARRIVALS PER DAY 707 616 562 572 563 519 520 491 509 389 375 382 369 369 353 339 350 332 267 288 258 350 244 207 220 221 268 205 178 256 196 151 258 248 147 223 217 82 88 88 205 177 145 161 33 54 44 136 56 38 103 0 56 5 14 35 61 11 17 23 29 5 11 17 23 29 4 10 17 24 30 5 11 17 23 29 5 11 17 23 29 4 10 16 21 June July Augus t September October November ADDITIONAL ANECDOTAL NARRATIVE Reasons for returns used by the new returnees or IDPs willing to return to their areas of origin • Reasons for IDPs returning to Sinjar include their desire to go home, in Sinjar. The main purpose of the system is to enable authorities to follow as well as the improved security situation in their areas of origin, while up on emerging issues/complaints, including but not limited to difficulties at Mukhtars, local NGOs and returnees have also encouraged IDPs to checkpoints, as well as on reports that some of the newly returned individ- return home. Threats of housing eviction in locations of displacement uals occupy buildings that do not belong to them. is also a factor for those IDPs returning to Sinjar. Otherwise, the main Challenges faced by returnees reason for IDPs returning to Al-Ba’aj also relates to their desire to go home, while the availability of services (such as education and health) • Debris removal has been noted as an obstacle to return, given the in their areas of origin is also central to the decision.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wash Needs in Schools Iraq
    COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW WASH NEEDS IN SCHOOLS OF KEY INDICATORS Note: Findings derived from WFP data are December 2019 IRAQ presented in turquoise boxes. Methodology Water Hygiene Sanitation 1 3 2 REACH Number of HH surveys conducted by Number of schools assessed by WFP Drinking water from a water source is available Drinking water from a water source is available Drinking water comes from an improved water source The water quality is perceived to be acceptable The main water source is at the school's premises Has access to handwashing facilities Has access to handwashing facilities of which is having water and soap available of which is functional of which is having soap Has access to improved sanitation facilities number of Average functional student toilets per school building number of toilets Average for students number of Average students per toilet Has access to student toilets separated by gender Has access to student toilets separated by gender Has unusable toilets Is having a good structural condition of student toilets Is having a good hygienic condition of student toilets Al-Falluja 115 88% 100% 78% 93% 100% 97% 100% 9,1 82% 0% Al-Ramadi 80 83% 98% 81% 98% 100% 100% 100% 8,6 93% 0% Al-Anbar Ana 74 31 44% 65% 87% 49% 72% 94% 94% 64% 66% 62% 94% 5,8 5,4 36 90% 90% 23% 100% 71% Heet 87 72% 100% 60% 100% 93% 97% 100% 9,0 88% 0% Shat Al-Arab 98 12% 92% 83% 11% 7,2 91 77% 56% 46% Al-Basrah Al-Khidhir 70 50% 66% 76% 11% 5,8 69 79% 74% 32% Al-Muthanna Al-Kufa 120 21% 46% 71% 99% 100% 23% 99% 6.5 71% 27% Al-Najaf Al-Najaf 94 2% 95% 98%
    [Show full text]
  • Sulaymaniyah Governorate Profile 2014 Draft 1.4.Indd
    IOM IRAQ GOVERNORATE PROFILE: SULAYMANIYAH APRIL 2014 KEY ISSUES FACING ANBAR CRISIS IDPS1 POPULATION FIGURES 39% of sites assessed were without adequate IDPs due to the Anbar crisis2 healthcare for IDP women 20,028 Syrian refugees3 91% of sites had IDP children not attending 25,148 primary or secondary school 894 Iraqi returnees from Syria4 96% of sites had Anbar IDPs unable to afford commodities 1.5 million total population5 96% of IDPs assessed are living in rented housing IDP FAMILIES AND LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED 87% of sites were without bedding available to most 6 IDPs DUE TO THE ANBAR CRISIS Families displaced due to Anbar Crisis 7 Rania OVERVIEW 0-168 Pshdar Sulaymaniyah, located in the northeast corner of Iraq, is part of the 169-803 Dokan semiautonomous Kurdish Regional Government (KRG). It currently hosts over 18,000 IDPs from Anbar as well as a significant population Sharbazher 804-2091 of Syrian refugees, 15,000 of which are in the Arbat Transit camp in the Penjwin southern region of the governorate. Sulaymaniyah is an attractive place for displaced families, as it enjoys stable security and a comparatively strong economy. By far, the most common type of housing for Anbar Crisis 2092-7727 Sulaymaniyah IDPs in Sulaymaniyah is rented housing. Many IDPs in this governorate are Chamchamal Halabja struggling due to a lack of employment opportunities, a language barrier, and the inability to afford commodities. Kalar 7728-16652 Darbandikhan This profile is an update to the 2013 governorate profile, available here: http://iomiraq.net/reports/sulaymaniyah-governorate-profile Sites identified 1 56 locations were identied in Sulaymaniyah as hosting IDPs; 54 of 2, 6 Figures based on April 2014 DTM, www.iomiraq.net/dtm-page 5 Figure from Central Statistical Organization – Republic of Iraq, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Protracted Displacement in Iraq: District of Origin Profiles
    PROTRACTED DISPLACEMENT IN IRAQ: DISTRICT OF ORIGIN PROFILES AUGUST 2021 IOM IRAQ The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. The information contained in this report is for general information purposes only. Names and boundaries on DTM information products do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. The information in the DTM portal and in this report is the result of data collected by IOM field teams and complements information provided and generated by governmental and other entities in Iraq. IOM Iraq endeavors to keep this information as up to date and accurate as possible, but makes no claim —expressed or implied— on the completeness, accuracy and suitability of the information provided through this report. Challenges that should be taken into account when using DTM data in Iraq include the fluidity of the displaced population movements along with repeated emergencies and limited or no access to parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdistan Region of Iraq Erbil, Duhok & Sulaymaniyah
    at a glance THE USE OF PROFILING IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ ERBIL, DUHOK & SULAYMANIYAH 2016 www.jips.org Why a profiling ? While a significant amount of information was available on IDPs and refugees residing in camps in the Kurdistan This Region of Iraq (KRI), less was known about those resid- profiling ing outside of camps, particularly in urban areas. entailed a col- Furthermore, most of the existing strategies to mitigate the effects of displacement focused on addressing the laborative approach, needs of either the IDP or refugee populations, while the capacity sharing, and devel- needs of the host communities living alongside these oping long-term responses to displaced groups received much less attention. the displacement concerns in Erbil However, the local communities and authorities Governorate. We did not know a lot about were deeply affected by the waves of displacement resulting from the conflicts in Syria and the rest of Iraq. IDPs and refugees residing out of camps, we By 2016 the urban population in Erbil Governorate had did not know the impact of the crisis on increased by 25 %, in Duhok Governorate by 31 % and in Sulaymaniyah Governorate by 15 % due to the displace- the host community. This profiling ment crises. This combined with the pervasive financial enlightened us about these crisis greatly exacerbated the strains already placed on issues. local communities. In this context, the Governorate authorities in Erbil, Diyar Lateef Omar Duhok and Sulaymaniyah together with UN partners National Humanitarian Advisor Erbil Refugee Council, decided to conduct studies comparing population Erbil Governorate groups (IDPs, refugees, and host communities) in differ- ent urban areas to inform longer term planning for the Kurdistan Regional Government authorities as well as the humanitarian and development community.
    [Show full text]
  • Iom Emergency Needs Assessments Post February 2006 Displacement in Iraq 1 January 2009 Monthly Report
    IOM EMERGENCY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS POST FEBRUARY 2006 DISPLACEMENT IN IRAQ 1 JANUARY 2009 MONTHLY REPORT Following the February 2006 bombing of the Samarra Al-Askari Mosque, escalating sectarian violence in Iraq caused massive displacement, both internal and to locations abroad. In coordination with the Iraqi government’s Ministry of Displacement and Migration (MoDM), IOM continues to assess Iraqi displacement through a network of partners and monitors on the ground. Most displacement over the past five years (since 2003) occurred in 2006 and has since slowed. However, displacement continues to occur in some locations and the humanitarian situation of those already displaced is worsening. Some Iraqis are returning, but their conditions in places of return are extremely difficult. The estimated number of displaced since February 2006 is more than 1.6 million individuals1. SUMMARY OF CURRENT IRAQI DISPLACEMENT AND RETURN: Returns While an estimated 1.6 million individuals are displaced in Iraq, returns continue to grow. This is particularly the case in Baghdad. Many returnees are coming back to find destroyed homes and infrastructure in disrepair. Buildings, pipe and electrical networks, and basic public services such as health care centers are all in need of rehabilitation to meet the needs of returning IDP and refugee families. Transportation for families who wish to return also continues to be an issue. Some families wish to return but do not have the financial resources to travel with their belongings to their places of origin. MoDM has offered 500,000 Iraqi Dinar (IQD), or approximately 432 USD to IDP families returning from another governorate, and they have offered 250,000 IQD for families returning within the same governorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Displacement As Challenge and Opportunity
    Displacement as challenge and opportunity Urban profile: Refugees, internally displaced persons and host community Sulaymaniyah Governorate and Garmian Administration, Kurdistan Region of Iraq August 2016 Reproduction and dissemination for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Profiling coordinator: Shadman Mahmoud (UNHCR). Research facilitation: Margharita Lundkvist-Houndoumadi (JIPS), Per Schoening (JIPS/NRC), Jozef Merkx, France Lau, Karam Hindi (UNHCR Erbil), Mohammed Hassan Mahmood, Omed Bakir Ahmed, Sirwan Hama Fatah, Aras Jalal Mohammed, Soran Khafur Salim (Sulaymaniyah Statistics Office), Ari Habeeb Ahmed and Sulaymaniyah Protection and Field Team (UNHCR Sulaymaniyah). Report preparation: Roger Guiu. Cartography: Bahar Hassan ( Sulaymaniya Statistics Office and Abdulkhalq Saeed (UNHCR Erbil). Cover image: Hemn Goran (AKO). Profiling Steering Committee members for the Kurdistan Region of Iraq: Erbil Refugee Council (ERC), International Organization for Migration (IOM), Joint Crisis Coordination Centre (JCC), United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN- HABITAT), United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The profiling exercise was funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Printed by UNHCR, October 2016 Report preparation, August 2016 Data collection, June
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Infiltration Karez in Northern Iraq: History and Current Status of Underground Aqueducts
    IQ/2009/SC/RP/1 September 2009 Original: English Survey of Infiltration Karez in Northern Iraq: History and Current Status of Underground Aqueducts A report prepared for UNESCO by Dale Lightfoot Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University Executive Summary Subterranean aqueducts, known as karez in Iraq, were identified, mapped and placed in historical context to document this important part of Iraq’s cultural heritage and to provide guidance for plans to rehabilitate karez systems in Iraq. Information was collected from existing karez inventories held by the Federal Government of Iraq (GOI) and the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq (KRG), historic cadastral maps which recorded the location of many karez, and through interviews and personal observation during several weeks of fieldwork conducted across northern Iraq. This work has documented 683 infiltration karez throughout the northern governorates (Dohuk, Ninewah, Erbil, Kirkuk, and Sulaymaniyah). The karez in this region have been adversely impacted by drought and excessive well pumping. Almost 40% of karez documented—and 70% of those that were still flowing five years ago—have been abandoned since the onset of drought in 2005. As a result of this decline, over 100,000 people have been forced to evacuate their homes since 2005. The study identified 116 karez that were still being used in summer 2009, but all have diminished flow, placing an estimated 36,000 people at risk of displacement. The recent decline of karez and the resulting migration can be considered to be an early warning signal for other serious problems concerning the future water supply in the area. The study recommends urgent intervention to restore the karez in 50 communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonostratigraphic Overview of the Zagros Suture Zone, Kurdistan Region, Northeast Iraq
    GeoArabia, 2012, v. 17, no. 4, p. 109-156 Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain Tectonostratigraphic overview of the Zagros Suture Zone, Kurdistan Region, Northeast Iraq Basim Al-Qayim, Azad Omer and Hemin Koyi ABSTRACT The northwestern segment of the Zagros Orogenic Belt of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq includes the Zagros Suture Zone which is consisting of allochthonous Tethyan Triassic–Eocene thrust sheets. The zone is bounded by the Zagros Main Reverse Fault in the northeast, and the Zagros Thrust Front in the southwest. Parts of this zone’s rocks are represented by stacks of thrust mega- sheets obducted over the autochthonous Cretaceous–Cenozoic sequence of the Arabian Plate margin. Each sheet represents a specific Tethyan tectono- stratigraphic facies, and includes (from older to younger): isolated Triassic carbonate platforms (Avroman Limestone), Jurassic carbonate imbricates (Chia Gara, Sargelu and other formations), radiolarites (Qulqula Group), sedimentary mélange (sedimentary-volcanic units of the Qulqula Group), ophiolites (Mawat and Penjwin ultramafics complexes), and Cenozoic fore-arc volcano- sedimentary sequences (Walash Group). Petrography, facies interpretation and lithostratigraphic correlation of these allochthons along four traverses across the Zagros Suture Zone of the examined area indicate that they evolved during the closure of the Neo-Tethys Ocean. Their stacking pattern and tectonic association resulted from two important events: the Late Cretaceous obduction processes, and the Late Miocene–Pliocene collision, uplift, folding and suturing between the Arabian Plate and the Sanandaj-Sirjan Block of Iran. Based on these field observations and by using the model of the Iranian Zagros evolution, a tectonic scenario is proposed to explain the history and evolution of the Zagros Suture Zone in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Guidance: Iraq
    European Asylum Support Office Country Guidance: Iraq Guidance note and common analysis The country guidance represents the common assessment of the situation in the country of origin by EU Member States. June 2019 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Country Guidance: Iraq Common analysis and guidance note The country guidance represents the common assessment of the situation in the country of origin by senior policy officials from EU Member States, in accordance with current EU legislation and jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). This guidance note does not release Member States from the obligation to individually, objectively and impartially examine each application for international protection. Each decision should be taken on the basis of the individual circumstances of the applicant and the situation in Iraq at the moment of the decision, according to precise and up-to-date country information, obtained from various relevant sources (Article 10 of the Asylum Procedures Directive). The analysis and guidance provided within this document are not exhaustive. June 2019 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN 978-92-9485-054-6 doi: 10.2847/80555 © European Asylum Support Office 2019 Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Suly Governoratre Profile.Indd
    SulAYMANIYAH GOvERNORATE PROFIlE OVERVIEW2 MAY 2015 308 IDP families 1% 661 IDP families 29,994 IDP FAMILIES 2% of IDPs in Suly IDP camps 65 IDP families 1 almost 0% total population: 17,500 individuals 179,964 IDP INDIVIDUALS 1,747 IDP families planned: 16,800 individuals 877 IDP families 6%i 3% DISPLACEMENT OVER TIME3 30,000 SYRIAN REFUGEE INDIVIDUALS 29,994 28,032 40% OF ALL IDPS ARE UNDER 26,129 26,637 2,580 IDP families 14,185 IDP families 813 IDP families 14 9% 47% 3% 21,353 20,943 16,199 553 IDP families 16,828 GOVERNORATE OF ORIGIN 2% 13,355 14,707 Ps l ID in Ir 21% al a 4,067 f q 2,036 32% o 3,338 % 8,205 IDP families 6 27% 11% 0% 2% 5% 29%99% MOST COMMON SHELTER TYPE Anbar Babylon Baghdad Diyala INTENTIONS Kirkuk Ninewa Salah al Din WAVES OF DISPLACEMENT Govt. Total 79% 21% Iraq 89% 8% 3% Sulaymaniya 81% 18% 9% 22% Sharbazher 100% 0% Rented Camps unfinished/ 32% Rania 53% 47% housing 86% 9% Abandoned buildings 0,01% Pshdar 100% 0% Kalar 85% 15% TOP PRIORITY NEEDS 13% Halabja 71% 29% 1 2 3 4 5 Dokan 89% 11% Darbandikhan 20% 80% 33%90% Chamchamal 52% 48% Access Pre June 14 14-Aug NFIs Food Other Shelter Return to place of origin Waiting on one or several factors to work (Kerosene) June July 14 Post September14 Locally integrate in current location 1. Iraq - CCCM Camps status report, 28 April 2015. Camp sites nased on REACH report: IDP and refugee camp locations as of 28 April 2015 2.All information, unless otherwise specified, in this report is from IOM’s Displacement rackingT Matrix (DTM) from 28 April 2015 and from field reports of the Rapid Assessment and Response Teams.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq IDP Humanitarian Response; Child Protection
    IRAQ IDP HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE CHILD PROTECTION | National Par tners GAP ANALYSIS MAP | Who is Doing What Where | September 2015 AKRE DISTRICT Location Map | Iraq, MENA Region ZAKHO DISTRICT AMEDI DISTRICT ERBIL DISTRICT HARIKAR : Psychosocial Support Services Psychosocial Support Services: HARIKAR.SOSD.WVI.NUJEEN Capacity Building : VOP TriangleGH.TDH : Psychosocial Support Services HARIKAR : Awareness Raising Separated & Unaccompanied : NUJEEN Community Based Networks : VOP TriangleGH.TDH : Specialised Servise Assistance HARIKAR : Capacity Building Specialised Servise Assistance : SCI.NUJEEN Awareness Raising : VOP TriangleGH.FOCSIV.SCI.TDH : Capacity Building HARIKAR : Community Based Networks Awareness Raising : SCI.SOSD.WVI.HARIKAR.NUJEEN TriangleGH.FOCSIV.SCI.TDH : Community Based Networks Capacity Building : HARIKAR.SCI.WVI.SOSD.NUJEEN TriangleGH.FOCSIV.SCI.TDH : Awareness Raising Community Based Networks : SCI.SOSD.WVI.HARIKAR.NUJEEN Zakho SCI : Separated & Unaccompanied DahuAkmedi Mergasur SUMEL DISTRICT Sumel RANIA DISTRICT Soran Psychosocial Support Services : NUJEEN.CRS.WARCHILD.HARIKAR.KURDS Shikhan Akre STEP : Separated & Unaccompanied Separated & Unaccompanied : SCI.NUJEEN Telafar Choman Legend: Community Based Networks : NUJEEN.WARCHILD.SCI.HARIKAR.CRS.KURDS STEP : Specialised Service Assistance Specialised Servise Assistance : WARCHILD.NUJEEN STEP : Community Based Networks Admin Boundaries Sinjar Hamdaniya Pshdar STEP : Awareness Raising Capacity Building : NUJEEN.WARCHILD.HARIKAR.CRS.KURDS Erbil Governorates Awareness
    [Show full text]
  • Sulaymaniyah District, Sulaymaniyah Governorate
    LABOUR MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES Sulaymaniyah District, Sulaymaniyah Governorate IOM Iraq – May 2020 This programme is supported by: List of Acronyms BEP Business Expansion Package BSP Business Support Package CIP Community Implementation Plan CoC Chamber of Commerce CoI Chamber of Industries CRC Community Resource Centre ESP Employment Support Package FGD Focus Group Discussion FT Farming Training IDP Internally Displaced Person ISIL Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant IOM International Organization for Migration JP Job Placement LMA Labour Market Assessment NFI Non-Food Items MoLSA Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs OJT On-the-Job Training SME Small and Medium Enterprise VT Vocational Training IOM Disclaimer The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. © 2020 International Organization for Migration (IOM) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]