Education Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Education Committee EDUCATION COMMITTEE Wednesday 1 October 2003 (Morning) Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2003. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 1 October 2003 Col. SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................................. 103 Education (School Meals) (Scotland) Regulations 2003 (SSI 2003/350).................................................... 103 SCHOOL TRANSPORT GUIDELINES ..................................................................................................................... 104 PROPOSED EDUCATION (ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR LEARNING) (SCOTLAND) BILL ............................................. 115 ADVISER ........................................................................................................................................................... 118 BUDGET PROCESS 2004-05 .............................................................................................................................. 119 SCHOOL DISCIPLINE ......................................................................................................................................... 138 EDUCATION COMMITTEE 5th Meeting 2003, Session 2 CONVENER *Robert Brown (Glasgow) (LD) DEPUTY CONVENER *Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Ms Wendy Alexander (Paisley North) (Lab) *Rhona Brankin (Midlothian) (Lab) *Ms Rosemary Byrne (South of Scotland) (SSP) *Fiona Hyslop (Lothians) (SNP) *Mr Adam Ingram (South of Scotland) (SNP) *Mr Kenneth Macintosh (Eastwood) (Lab) *Dr Elaine Murray (Dumfries) (Lab) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTES Brian Adam (Aberdeen North) (SNP) Mr Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab) Rosie Kane (Glasgow) (SSP) David Mundell (South of Scotland) (Con) Mr Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD) *attended THE FOLLOWING GAVE EVIDENCE: Basil Haddad (Scottish Executive Education Department) Peter Peacock (Minister for Education and Young People) Philip Rycroft (Scottish Executive Education Department) Ann Scott (Scottish Executive Education Department) Ewan Swaffield (Scottish Executive Development Department) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Martin Verity SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Peter McGrath ASSISTANT CLERK Ian Cowan LOCATION Committee Room 3 103 1 OCTOBER 2003 104 Scottish Parliament School Transport Guidelines Education Committee 10:21 Wednesday 1 October 2003 The Convener: The next item relates to the (Morning) school transport guidelines and is a hangover from the previous committee. [THE CONVENER opened the meeting at 10:19] Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): I advise the committee that I have been asked by the Presiding Officer to serve on the Subordinate Legislation panel for the selection of the children’s commissioner. I have been advised by the clerks that there is no conflict of interests, but I thought Education (School Meals) (Scotland) that the committee should be aware of the fact and Regulations 2003 (SSI 2003/350) I wished to put it on the record. The Convener (Robert Brown): Good morning Rhona Brankin (Midlothian) (Lab): I, too, will and welcome to the fifth meeting of the Education be sitting on that panel. Committee. I remind members that we are in The Convener: I think that, as the convener of public session and ask them to switch off their the committee, I will be on it as well. Are there any mobile phones and all bleeping instruments of one other confessions to be made on the matter? As sort and another. Lord James says, the declaration is not necessary The first item on the agenda is consideration of but it makes the matter public. the Education (School Meals) (Scotland) Rhona Brankin: I should perhaps also put on Regulations 2003. The item follows a debate in record the fact that Graham Donaldson, the senior Parliament on the instrument and is about chief inspector for Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of implementation. We were due to have an Education, is my brother-in-law. I will give him a Executive official in attendance, but the lady in really hard time when he comes here. question is not very well this morning, so we do not have an official present. The instrument is The Convener: Thank you for that. subject to the negative procedure, so we will have Let us turn to the school transport guidelines, as to take positive steps if anyone formally objects to I was trying to do before those slight diversions. it. Does any member have any issues to raise on The Scottish Executive has issued an amended the regulations? guidance paper and we have three officials with Members: No. us—they are out in full force today. The posse of officials includes Ann Scott, Ann Whatcott and The Convener: The regulations are designed to Ewan Swaffield. It will not be necessary for you to make changes as a result of other changes that make an opening statement unless there is were made at Westminster to bring things into line anything that you are desperately keen to say to with regard to tax credits of various sorts for free us. However, we would like to ask you one or two school meals. Is the committee agreed that the questions. regulations should proceed and that we are not going to invoke any procedure to try to stop them? Fiona Hyslop (Lothians) (SNP): I am sure that the officials are aware of the two petitions on Members indicated agreement. school transport that were submitted during the previous session of Parliament. Our predecessor committee wrote to the Executive, asking it to produce new guidelines. I notice that, in paragraph 20 of the guidelines, you acknowledge the need for councils to be more flexible in taking into consideration increases in the volume of traffic and in ensuring the provision of sufficient pavements, footpaths and other safety measures. Are there any cost implications to that? Will the Executive provide more support to enable local authorities to be more flexible in addressing personal safety issues? 105 1 OCTOBER 2003 106 Ann Scott (Scottish Executive Education concerns be established or should local authorities Department): In the Executive’s view, it is for the assess each transport route as a matter of local authorities to decide how much money they routine—annually, for example—to take account of assign to school transport issues. I do not think changing circumstances? The same could be said that the possibility of more money for more in relation to supervision on bus routes and the flexibility was raised with us. extent to which circumstances change over time after incidents. Do local authority processes Fiona Hyslop: The guidelines are welcome in incorporate a way of doing that systematically? that they make some movement towards recognising the need for more flexibility. Volume of Ann Scott: I cannot answer questions about traffic is an issue; in the past, many rural areas local authority processes. might not have had the volumes of traffic that they Mr Ingram: Is there a role for the Executive to have now. We know that there has been a big lay down such a system for local authorities? increase in the volume of traffic, which has expenditure implications. We cannot put a value Ann Scott: Our approach has been to on safety—children are either safe or unsafe. Do encourage local authorities to be flexible in you think that the guidelines have cost implications interpreting what they consider to be the major for local authorities? issues, rather than to try to prescribe what they should do. The Education Department suggested, Ann Scott: If local authorities feel that there are when it wrote to the Education Committee’s implications, they will let us know. I cannot offer predecessor committee about safety last year, that any advice or guidance on whether further funding trying to circumscribe the factors that local will be available. authorities could take into account might narrow Fiona Hyslop: I will give you a practical their interpretation of such matters. I do not know example from my area. In the Lothians, up to whether either of my transport colleagues wants to 15,000 houses will be built in the near future and add anything on that. in certain areas—in Livingston, for example— The Convener: Adam Ingram asked about major new build happens on a regular basis. That further guidance. Am I right in thinking that there is means that there are safety issues in getting to a duty to provide transport under the 2 and 3-mile school. Although the problems might not be limits, but a power to provide it in addition to that if permanent, the guidelines might have to address a local authority sees fit? safety issues to do with major traffic that are arising here and now. In such a situation, do you Ann Scott: There is a duty to provide school envisage that local authorities will be a bit more transport. The 2 and 3-mile stipulations relate to flexible on their strict miles guidelines by indicating attendance at school and the distance beyond that
Recommended publications
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet
    MINISTERS, LAW OFFICERS AND Scottish MINISTERIAL PARLIAMENTARY AIDES BY Parliament CABINET: SESSION 1 Fact sheet This Fact sheet provides a list of all of the Scottish Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides during Session 1, from 12 May 1999 until the appointment of new Ministers in the second MSPs: Historical parliamentary session. Series Ministers and Law Officers continue to serve in post during 30 March 2007 dissolution. The first Session 2 cabinet was appointed on 21st May 2003. A Minister is a member of the government. The Scottish Executive is the government in Scotland for devolved matters and is responsible for formulating and implementing policy in these areas. The Scottish Executive is formed from the party or parties holding a majority of seats in the Parliament. During Session 1 the Scottish Executive consisted of a coalition of Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs. The senior Ministers in the Scottish government are known as ‘members of the Scottish Executive’ or ‘the Scottish Ministers’ and together they form the Scottish ‘Cabinet’. They are assisted by junior Scottish Ministers. With the exception of the Scottish Law Officers, all Ministers must be MSPs. This fact sheet also provides a list of the Law Officers. The Scottish Law Officers listed advise the Scottish Executive on legal matters and represent its interests in court. The final section lists Ministerial Parliamentary Aides (MPAs). MPAs are MSPs appointed by the First Minister on the recommendation of Ministers whom they assist in discharging their duties. MPAs are unpaid and are not part of the Executive. Their role and the arrangements for their appointment are set out in paragraphs 4.6-4.13 of the Scottish Ministerial Code.
    [Show full text]
  • CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parl
    ANNEXE A: REPORT FROM THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENTARY STANDARDS COMMISSIONER AND ASSOCIATED ANNEXES CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parliament on complaint no. 10C/09 Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 28 September 2010 Commissioner: D. Stuart Allan 44 Drumsheugh Gardens Edinburgh EH3 7SW Direct Tel: 0300 011 0550 E-mail: [email protected] CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report on complaint no. 10C/09 to the Scottish Parliament Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament (“the Code”) has been approved by the Scottish Parliament under its Standing Orders to provide a set of principles and standards for its Members. 1.2 Other relevant provisions relating to the conduct of MSPs include the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”)1 and the Parliament’s standing orders. 1.3 For the purpose of this complaint, the relevant editions of the Code are editions 3 and 4 which were approved by the Parliament in May 2007 and in March 2009 respectively2. 1.4 The regulation of the Code and of the other relevant provisions relating to conduct is undertaken in terms of the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”)3. 1.5 This Report is submitted to the Parliament in terms of section 9 of the 2002 Act. 1 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/acts2006/asp_20060012_en_1 2 http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/conduct/index.htm (edition 4 of the Code) 3 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/Scotland/acts2002/asp_20020016_en_1 - 2 - 2.0 Complaint 2.1 The complainer (“the complainer”) is Mr Ian Gemmell and his complaint is about Mr Kenneth J Gibson, MSP (“the respondent”).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Session 3 Msps Not Standing Or Not Returned in the 2011 Election 6 May 2011 Msps: Historical Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet Session 3 MSPs Not Standing or Not Returned in the 2011 Election 6 May 2011 MSPs: Historical Series 48 Session 3 MSPs were not returned to the Scottish Parliament in Session 4. They either did not stand as a candidate for re-election, or they stood but were not re-elected. This fact sheet is divided into two sections. The first section lists those MSPs who stood for re- election but failed to win a seat. The second section lists those MSPs who were serving at the end of Parliamentary Session 3 (22 March 2011) but chose not to stand for re-election. Abbreviation Party Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation Session 3 MSPs who stood for re-election in 2011 but failed to win a seat: MSP Party Constituency (C) or Region (R) Robert Brown LD Glasgow (R) Derek Brownlee Con East Lothian (C), South Scotland (R) Bill Butler Lab Glasgow Anniesland (C) Cathie Craigie Lab Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (C) Ross Finnie LD Greenock and Inverclyde (C), West Scotland (R) Karen Gillon Lab Clydesdale (C) Charlie Gordon Lab Glasgow Cathcart (C) Andy Kerr Lab East Kilbride (C) Marilyn Livingstone Lab Kirkcaldy (C) Frank McAveety Lab Glasgow Shettleston (C) Tom McCabe Lab Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse (C) Anne McLaughlin SNP Glasgow Provan (C), Glasgow (R) Pauline McNeill Lab Glasgow Kelvin (C) Des McNulty Lab Clydebank and Milngavie (C)
    [Show full text]
  • Sppa/S3/09/6/A Standards, Procedures and Public
    SPPA/S3/09/6/A STANDARDS, PROCEDURES AND PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE AGENDA 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 The Committee will meet at 2.15 pm in Committee Room 6. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 5 in private and to consider a draft report on its Hybrid Bills inquiry in private at future meetings. 2. Cross-Party Groups: The Committee will consider applications for recognition from three proposed Cross-Party Groups. 3. Annual report: The Committee will consider a draft annual report for the Parliament year from 9 May 2008 to 8 May 2009. 4. Review of Section 2 of the Code of Conduct (in private): The Committee will receive a briefing. 5. Hybrid Bills inquiry: The Committee will consider written evidence received. 6. Accuracy of contributions in parliamentary proceedings (in private): The Committee will consider a draft report. Gillian Baxendine/Alison Walker Clerks to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee Room TG.01 The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh Tel: 0131 348 5239 Email: [email protected] SPPA/S3/09/6/A The papers for this meeting are as follows— Agenda item 2 Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Agenda item 3 Draft annual report SPPA/S3/09/6/2 (P) Agenda item 5 Written evidence SPPA/S3/09/6/3 (P) Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/4 (P) Agenda item 6 Draft report SPPA/S3/09/6/5 (P) SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 Cross-Party Group applications Introduction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 12 June 2008 Session 3 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2008. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by RR Donnelley. CONTENTS Thursday 12 June 2008 Debates Col. EDUCATION CUTS ........................................................................................................................................... 9589 Motion moved—[Rhona Brankin]. Amendment moved—[Fiona Hyslop]. Amendment moved—[Murdo Fraser]. Amendment moved—[Jeremy Purvis]. Rhona Brankin (Midlothian) (Lab).............................................................................................................. 9589 The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning (Fiona Hyslop) ............................................ 9592 Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) ............................................................................................. 9595 Jeremy Purvis (Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale) (LD) ........................................................................ 9596 Mary Mulligan (Linlithgow) (Lab) ............................................................................................................... 9599 Rob Gibson (Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • The Comedy Unit, and a BBC Scotland Television Series, River City (BBC, 2002-Date)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Glasgow Theses Service Creative Industries Policy and Practice: A Study of BBC Scotland and Scottish Screen Lynne Alison Hibberd BA (Hons), MPhil Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Glasgow Faculty of Arts and Humanities Centre for Cultural Policy Research Department of Theatre Film and Television Studies December 2008 © Lynne Alison Hibberd 2008 2 Abstract This thesis examines creative industries policy in film and television in Scotland. It explores the impact that different approaches to creative industries policy have on creative practice in two media industries, BBC Scotland and Scottish Screen, and reflects on how each of these bodies articulates its role as a „national‟ institution. BBC Scotland is the Scottish branch of the UK‟s largest public service broadcaster, while Scottish Screen exists on a far smaller scale, to serve the screen industries in Scotland. The thesis examines the role of BBC Scotland in sustaining the creative economy and contributing to the cultural life of Scotland. The study of Scottish Screen examines a key early aim of the agency, that of establishing a national film studio. The work investigates the connections between UK and Scottish levels of creative industries policy in light of the debates over the future of public service broadcasting and the Scottish Executive‟s cultural policy framework. The study outlines how ideas of cultural creativity and its economic significance have developed, charts how these ideas have affected policy debate, and explores the extent to which devolution has affected film and television policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    LIST OF ALL MSPS A-Z: SESSION 2 Scottish Parliament The Fact sheet provides an alphabetical list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the second Fact sheet parliamentary session, 7 May 2003 – 2 April 2007. It also lists the party for which each MSP was elected as well as the constituency or region that they represented. MSPs: Historical The abbreviation (C) has been used to indicate a constituency seat Series and (R) to indicate a regional seat. 12 March 2009 1 MSP Party Constituency or Region Brian Adam Scottish National Party Aberdeen North (C) Bill Aitken Conservative Glasgow (R) Wendy Alexander Labour Paisley North (C) Andrew Arbuckle1 Liberal Democrat Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Jackie Baillie Labour Dumbarton (C) Shiona Baird Green North East Scotland (R) Richard Baker Labour North East Scotland (R) Chris Ballance Green South of Scotland (R) Mark Ballard Green Lothians (R) Scott Barrie Labour Dunfermline West (C) Sarah Boyack Labour Edinburgh Central (C) Rhona Brankin Labour Midlothian (C) Ted Brocklebank Conservative Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Robert Brown Liberal Democrat Glasgow (R) Derek Brownlee2 Conservative South of Scotland (R) Bill Butler Labour Glasgow Anniesland (C) Rosemary Byrne3 Scottish Socialist Party South of Scotland (R) Dennis Canavan Independent Falkirk West (C) Malcolm Chisholm Labour Edinburgh North and Leith (C) Cathie Craigie Labour Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (C) Bruce Crawford Scottish National Party Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Roseanna Cunningham Scottish National Party Perth (C) Frances Curran Scottish Socialist Party West of Scotland (R) Margaret Curran Labour Glasgow Baillieston (C) David Davidson Conservative North East Scotland (R) Susan Deacon Labour Edinburgh East and Mussleburgh (C) James Douglas-Hamilton Conservative Lothians (R) Helen Eadie Labour Dunfermline East (C) Fergus Ewing Scottish National Party Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber (C) 1 Andrew Arbuckle became the regional member for Mid Scotland and Fife on 10 January 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Committee
    EDUCATION COMMITTEE Wednesday 14 January 2004 (Morning) Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2004. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 14 January 2004 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE ............................................................................................................................................... 655 PETITION .......................................................................................................................................................... 657 Early-years Education and Child Care (PE523) .......................................................................................... 657 SCHOOL TRANSPORT GUIDELINES ..................................................................................................................... 663 EDUCATION (ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR LEARNING) (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 1 ............................................... 667 EDUCATION COMMITTEE
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Committee
    ENTERPRISE AND LIFELONG LEARNING COMMITTEE Wednesday 22 January 2003 (Morning) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2003. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 22 January 2003 Col. LEGACY PAPER................................................................................................................................... 3048 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION.................................................................................................................. 3055 Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/335) ............................... 3055 ENTERPRISE AND LIFELONG LEARNING COMMITTEE † 3rd Meeting 2003, Session 1 CONVENER *Alex Neil (Central Scotland) (SNP) DEPU TY CONVENER *Miss Annabel Goldie (West of Scotland) (Con) COMMI TTEE MEMBERS *Rhona Brankin (Midlothian) (Lab) Brian Fitzpatrick (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (Lab) *Mr Adam Ingram (South of Scotland) (SNP) *Gordon
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Towards a Healthier Scotland: Newsletter for the Public Health Function, October 2000
    Moving Towards a Healthier Scotland: Newsletter for the public health function, October 2000 Introduction Welcome to the first newsletter from the Scottish Executive on the drive to improve public health. Developments in the implementation of the public health agenda are happening apace. The commitment made in “Towards a Healthier Scotland” to bring together the NHS with local authorities, voluntary and community organisations to tackle health inequalities is being met through new developments such as the Healthy Scotland Convention, the White Paper Demonstration Projects and targeting of the Tobacco Tax Health Improvement Fund. Implementation of the Public Health Function Review is well under way with the establishment of a Public Health Institute for Scotland, and ongoing work around public health standards, training and networks. The outcome of the Review of Nurses’ Contributions to Improving the Public’s Health is keenly awaited, and is expected to report shortly. This newsletter is intended to provide an overview of progress to date. It is the first stage in communicating developments to a wide audience and aims to ensure that anyone with an interest in public health in Scotland is kept informed. Implementation Group Following the launch of the Review of the Public Health Function in Scotland in December 1999 an implementation plan was prepared to take the Review forward on a national basis. A Public Health Function Review Implementation Group was formed with a remit to oversee implementation of the Review of the Public Health Function in Scotland, and to liaise with all key stakeholders in the development of the public health function as outlined in the Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’S Parliament: Scotland’S Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities)
    Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’s Parliament: Scotland’s Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities) [note from Paul Cairney: this is a PDF of the copy/pasted text from the SCC’s no-longer- there webpage] Welcome to the new Home page of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. This site has been setup to co-incide with the launch of its new report to the Scottish People, the site has a feedback facility to enable you to send in your comments to us, also included are links to other relevant sites. http://www.almac.co.uk/business_park/scc/ Joint Chairs: Lord Ewing of Kirkford Rt. Hon. Sir David Steel MP Chair of Executive Committee: Canon Kenyon Wright SCOTTISH CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Formation of the Scottish Constitutional Convention The proposal to establish a Constitutional Convention came from a committee of prominent Scots who in July 1988 in their report "A Claim of Right for Scotland" recommended that a Convention should be established to draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly or Parliament. The Committee itself was created following the result of the 1987 General Election as they believed action had to be taken on the way Scotland was governed. The Committee met between January and June of 1988, chaired by Professor Sir Robert Grieve with a former senior Scottish Office civil servant Jim Ross as secretary. In January 1989 a cross party meeting was held to consider proposals for a Convention at which the Scottish National Party expressed their reservations concerning a Convention and later withdrew. The Conservative Party had already made it clear they would take no part in the proposed Convention.
    [Show full text]