DOCSLIB.ORG

Sppa/S3/09/6/A Standards, Procedures and Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SPPA/S3/09/6/A STANDARDS, PROCEDURES AND PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE AGENDA 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 The Committee will meet at 2.15 pm in Committee Room 6. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 5 in private and to consider a draft report on its Hybrid Bills inquiry in private at future meetings. 2. Cross-Party Groups: The Committee will consider applications for recognition from three proposed Cross-Party Groups. 3. Annual report: The Committee will consider a draft annual report for the Parliament year from 9 May 2008 to 8 May 2009. 4. Review of Section 2 of the Code of Conduct (in private): The Committee will receive a briefing. 5. Hybrid Bills inquiry: The Committee will consider written evidence received. 6. Accuracy of contributions in parliamentary proceedings (in private): The Committee will consider a draft report. Gillian Baxendine/Alison Walker Clerks to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee Room TG.01 The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh Tel: 0131 348 5239 Email: [email protected] SPPA/S3/09/6/A The papers for this meeting are as follows— Agenda item 2 Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Agenda item 3 Draft annual report SPPA/S3/09/6/2 (P) Agenda item 5 Written evidence SPPA/S3/09/6/3 (P) Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/4 (P) Agenda item 6 Draft report SPPA/S3/09/6/5 (P) SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 Cross-Party Group applications Introduction 1. In accordance with the provisions on Cross-Party Groups set out in Section 6 of the Code of Conduct, proposals for the establishment of Cross- Party Groups (CPGs) in the Scottish Parliament must be submitted to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee for its approval. 2. The applications due for the Committee’s consideration were submitted prior to the Parliament’s recent approval of a revision to section 6 of the Code of Conduct. Therefore, the Rules referred to in the registration forms relate to the previous version of section 6. 3. The effect and requirements of the Rules are not affected by the recent update. This paper sets out the Rules as they currently stand in section 6.4, as required by section 6.3.1. 4. There are three proposed groups for the Committee’s consideration. None have been active in previous sessions. Proposed CPG on Scottish Universities 5. The registration form submitted by the proposed Group is attached as Annexe A. Purpose 6. Rule 1 states that a group “must be Parliamentary in character, and its purpose must be of genuine public interest”. The purpose of this proposed Group is described as— “To consider and discuss the future of Scottish Universities.” Membership 7. Rule 2 requires group membership to include at least five MSPs, with each of the parties or groups represented in the Parliamentary Bureau. 8. The MSP membership (by party) of the proposed CPG on Scottish Universities is: • 2 Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party • 1 Scottish Green Party • 7 Scottish Labour Party • 1 Scottish Liberal Democrats • 1 Scottish National Party 1 SPPA/S3/09/6/1 9. Rule 3 entitles groups to contain members from outwith the Parliament, although the overall membership profile should remain Parliamentary in character. To guarantee and maintain the Parliamentary nature of group meetings, Rule 8 requires at least two MSPs (who are registered members of the group) to be present at any meetings. 10. Rule 6 states that only registered group members may vote at any meeting. Clarification on the voting rights of external group members is provided in Volume 3, Section 6.1.3: “Each member is entitled to vote at group meetings, for example, an individual member has the right to vote; an organisation or group has only one vote but is able to send a different representative of the organisation or group to meetings and that person may vote on behalf of that body.” 11. The Committee may wish to note that the proposed group has listed a number of individual external members, with some of those individuals being members of the same organisation. The Committee may wish to seek clarification on whether the individuals listed will attend group meetings in an individual or representational capacity: in the event of more than one individual being present from the same organisation, the Committee may also wish to seek clarification on how the proposed group will conduct any votes. Office Bearers 12. Rule 4 requires at least two office bearers within a proposed group to be MSPs. This proposed group has identified the following as Co-Conveners: • Murdo Fraser MSP • Rhona Brankin MSP • Christopher Harvie MSP • Margaret Smith MSP • Robin Harper MSP Subscription and Financial Benefits 13. Rule 9 sets out the terms on any subscription charges. The registration form indicates that the proposed group does not charge a subscription for members. 14. Rule 10 requires groups to register any financial or material benefit received by the group from a single source, where the total of that benefit exceeds £500 in any one calendar year. At the time of registration the tariff was £250. The registration form indicates that the proposed group has received no financial or other material benefit. Proposed CPG on Credit Unions 15. The registration form submitted by the proposed Group is attached as Annexe B. Purpose 16. The purpose, as required under Rule 1, of this proposed Group is— 2 SPPA/S3/09/6/1 “To provide a forum to discuss issues, which involve credit unions in Scotland. The CPG will also create a foundation for policy development relating to credit unions and help to form a network of good practice between credit unions and parliamentarians. The CPG may also promote the positive role of credit unions as social enterprises in Scotland.” Membership 17. MSP membership (by party) of the proposed CPG on Credit Unions, as required under Rule 2 is: • 2 Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party • 6 Scottish Labour Party • 1 Scottish Liberal Democrats • 2 Scottish National Party 18. The proposed Group has registered five individual external members. Two of these are members of the same organisation (Capital Credit Union). 19. In line with the guidance on voting rights as set out in Volume 3, Section 6.1.3, the Committee may wish to seek clarification on how the proposed Group may conduct any votes at meetings at which the two individuals from the same organisation are present. Office Bearers 20. Rule 4 requires at least two office bearers within a proposed group to be MSPs. The proposed CPG on Credit Unions has Frank McAveety MSP as its Convener, with three Vice-Conveners: John Wilson MSP; Mary Scanlon MSP and Robert Brown MSP. Subscription and Financial Benefits 21. Rule 9 sets out the terms on any subscription charges. The registration form indicates that the proposed group does not charge a subscription for members. 22. Rule 10 requires groups to register any financial or material benefit received by the group from a single source, where the total of that benefit exceeds £500 in any one calendar year. At the time of registration the tariff was £250. The registration form indicates that the proposed group has received no financial or other material benefit. Proposed CPG on Town and City Centre Development 23. The registration form submitted by the proposed Group is attached as Annexe C. Purpose 24. The full text of the proposed Group’s purpose, as required under Rule 1, is contained within Annexe C. The Committee may wish to consider whether it would be more accessible if the purpose was limited to the final sentence within the proposed Group’s registration form— 3 SPPA/S3/09/6/1 “The aim of the group is to ensure that Scotland’s traditional town/city centres are suitably placed within the economic growth agenda, and are fit for purpose in the future for people to live, work, invest and play in.” Membership 25. MSP membership (by party) of the proposed CPG on Town and City Centre Development, as required under Rule 2 is: • 3 Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party • 1 Scottish Green Party • 11 Scottish Labour Party • 3 Scottish Liberal Democrats • 2 Scottish National Party Office Bearers 26. Rule 4 requires at least two office bearers within a proposed group to be MSPs. The proposed CPG on Town and City Centre Development has Marilyn Livingstone MSP as its Convener, with Jamie Stone MSP as Vice- Convener. 27. The proposed Group has listed a number of external organisations within its membership. Two of these organisations will provide the secretary and treasurer posts. Subscription and Financial Benefits 28. Rule 9 sets out the terms on any subscription charges. The registration form indicates that the proposed group has agreed a maximum subscription of £50 per group member per year. 29. The proposed group has not registered any financial or other material benefit at this stage. Recommendation 30. The Committee is invited to consider whether to accord recognition to the following proposed Cross-Party Groups: • Scottish Universities • Credit Unions • Town and City Centre Development 4 Annexe A CROSS-PARTY GROUPS IN THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT REGISTRATION FORM 1. GROUP NAME Code of Conduct 6.2.2 Groups that have undertaken to comply with the rules on Cross-Party Groups may use the words Cross-Party Group in the Scottish Parliament in their title. Cross-Party Group in the Scottish Parliament on Scottish Universities 2. GROUP PURPOSE Code of Conduct 6.2.4 and 6.3, Rule 1 A brief statement of the main purpose of the group.
Recommended publications
  • Culture and Sport Glasgow

    Culture and Sport Glasgow

    Culture and Sport Glasgow (operating as Glasgow Life) (A Company which is a Scottish charity (Scottish charity number SC037844) incorporated in Scotland under the Companies Acts with company number SC313851) MINUTE of a MEETING of the Board of Directors of Culture and Sport Glasgow held via Videoconference on 25 November 2020 at 10am. Present: Councillor David McDonald (Chair) Councillor Eva Bolander Professor John Brown CBE Sir Angus Grossart (part meeting) Iain MacRitchie Dr Bridget McConnell CBE Lee McConnell John McCormick Councillor Frank McAveety (part meeting) Siobhan Nairn Councillor Franny Scally (part meeting) Dilawer Singh MBE Attending: Susan Deighan, Director of City Marketing and External Relations; Jan Buchanan, Director of Finance and Corporate Services; Billy Garrett, Director of Sport and Events; Jill Miller OBE, Director of Cultural Services; and Allan Drysdale, Governance and Liaison Officer; all Culture and Sport Glasgow. Apologies: Professor Sir Anton Muscatelli Councillor Michael Cullen 1. Welcome The Chief Executive welcomed those present to the meeting. Having noted that the relevant notice had been issued and a quorum was present, the Board proceeded to business as hereinafter minuted. 2. Apologies noted. 1 The Board noted that apologies had been received from Professor Sir Anton Muscatelli and Councillor Michael Cullen. 3. Appointment of Chairs agreed. The Chief Executive advised that in terms of Article 73 of the Company’s Articles of Association: ‘Each office shall be held (subject to article 74) until the conclusion of the annual general meeting which next follows; a director whose period of office expires under this article may be re-appointed to that office under article 71 (providing he/she is willing to act)’.
  • © Patricia M`Cafferty, May 2004. Abstract

    © Patricia M`Cafferty, May 2004. Abstract

    PATRICIA MCCAFFERTY WORKING THE 'THIRD WAY': NEW LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS, AND SCOTTISH DEVOLUTION THESIS PRESENTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW MAY 2004 © PATRICIA M`CAFFERTY, MAY 2004. ABSTRACT Labour's election victory in 1997 was heralded as a new era, the dawn of a Third Way, a novel attempt to chart a unique political course overcoming the perceivedlimitations of both New Right and Old Labour. In this thesis I explore the era of New Labour generally and, in particular, the impact of the Third Way on working lives. Key to my analysis is New Labour's attempt to synthesise oppositional interests,in particular those of capital and labour. This involves a crucial rhetoric of flexibility, competitivenessand partnership. My research explores the rhetoric of New Labour in relation to the reality of this new force in power. It does this by: " drawing out key features in the development of New Labour, especially its relation to Old Labour; " examining central elementsof New Labour ideology; " arguing that Scotland should be seen as central to the transition from Old to New :Labour; " utilising a case study of industrial relations developments in a major electronics factory in the West of Scotland and, to a lesser extent, key developmentsin public sector employment. My main finding is that where New Labour's ideology promisespositive benefits, the form of its implementation has negative impacts for workers. Since I take New Labour as a process, my thesis concludes with a more speculative exploration of possible future developments,both in relations to New Labour's role in them, and their possible impact on the New Labour project.
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
  • Spice Briefing

    Spice Briefing

    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
  • Lettre Conjointe De 1.080 Parlementaires De 25 Pays Européens Aux Gouvernements Et Dirigeants Européens Contre L'annexion De La Cisjordanie Par Israël

    Lettre Conjointe De 1.080 Parlementaires De 25 Pays Européens Aux Gouvernements Et Dirigeants Européens Contre L'annexion De La Cisjordanie Par Israël

    Lettre conjointe de 1.080 parlementaires de 25 pays européens aux gouvernements et dirigeants européens contre l'annexion de la Cisjordanie par Israël 23 juin 2020 Nous, parlementaires de toute l'Europe engagés en faveur d'un ordre mondial fonde ́ sur le droit international, partageons de vives inquietudeś concernant le plan du president́ Trump pour le conflit israeló -palestinien et la perspective d'une annexion israélienne du territoire de la Cisjordanie. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par le preć edent́ que cela creerait́ pour les relations internationales en geń eral.́ Depuis des decennies,́ l'Europe promeut une solution juste au conflit israeló -palestinien sous la forme d'une solution a ̀ deux Etats,́ conformement́ au droit international et aux resolutionś pertinentes du Conseil de securit́ e ́ des Nations unies. Malheureusement, le plan du president́ Trump s'ecarté des parametres̀ et des principes convenus au niveau international. Il favorise un controlê israelień permanent sur un territoire palestinien fragmente,́ laissant les Palestiniens sans souverainete ́ et donnant feu vert a ̀ Israel̈ pour annexer unilateralement́ des parties importantes de la Cisjordanie. Suivant la voie du plan Trump, la coalition israelienné recemment́ composeé stipule que le gouvernement peut aller de l'avant avec l'annexion des̀ le 1er juillet 2020. Cette decisioń sera fatale aux perspectives de paix israeló -palestinienne et remettra en question les normes les plus fondamentales qui guident les relations internationales, y compris la Charte des Nations unies. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par l'impact de l'annexion sur la vie des Israelienś et des Palestiniens ainsi que par son potentiel destabilisateuŕ dans la regioń aux portes de notre continent.
  • Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet

    Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet

    MINISTERS, LAW OFFICERS AND Scottish MINISTERIAL PARLIAMENTARY AIDES BY Parliament CABINET: SESSION 1 Fact sheet This Fact sheet provides a list of all of the Scottish Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides during Session 1, from 12 May 1999 until the appointment of new Ministers in the second MSPs: Historical parliamentary session. Series Ministers and Law Officers continue to serve in post during 30 March 2007 dissolution. The first Session 2 cabinet was appointed on 21st May 2003. A Minister is a member of the government. The Scottish Executive is the government in Scotland for devolved matters and is responsible for formulating and implementing policy in these areas. The Scottish Executive is formed from the party or parties holding a majority of seats in the Parliament. During Session 1 the Scottish Executive consisted of a coalition of Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs. The senior Ministers in the Scottish government are known as ‘members of the Scottish Executive’ or ‘the Scottish Ministers’ and together they form the Scottish ‘Cabinet’. They are assisted by junior Scottish Ministers. With the exception of the Scottish Law Officers, all Ministers must be MSPs. This fact sheet also provides a list of the Law Officers. The Scottish Law Officers listed advise the Scottish Executive on legal matters and represent its interests in court. The final section lists Ministerial Parliamentary Aides (MPAs). MPAs are MSPs appointed by the First Minister on the recommendation of Ministers whom they assist in discharging their duties. MPAs are unpaid and are not part of the Executive. Their role and the arrangements for their appointment are set out in paragraphs 4.6-4.13 of the Scottish Ministerial Code.
  • Reports to Conference Spring 2015 Contents

    Reports to Conference Spring 2015 Contents

    REPORTS TO CONFERENCE SPRING 2015 CONTENTS Contents Page Federal Conference Committee……….……………………….……………..4 Federal Policy Committee......................…………...……………………......9 Federal Executive.............………………... ………………………………...17 Federal Finance and Administration Committee………….….…..............25 Parliamentary Party (Commons)……………………………. ……………...29 …………. Parliamentary Party (Lords)………………………..………………………...35 Parliamentary Party (Europe)………………………….……………………..41 Campaign for Gender Balance……………………………………………...45 Diversity Engagement Group……………………………………………..…50 3 Federal Conference Committee Glasgow 2015 Last autumn we went back to Glasgow for the second year running. As in 2013 we received a superb welcome from the city. We continue to ask all attendees to complete an online feedback questionnaire. A good percentage complete this but I would urge all members to take the time to participate. It is incredibly useful to the conference office and FCC and does influence whether we visit a venue again and if we do, what changes we need to try and make. FCC Changes Following the committee elections at the end of last year there were a number of changes to the membership of FCC. Qassim Afzal, Louise Bloom, Sal Brinton, Prateek Buch, Veronica German, Evan Harris and David Rendel either did not restand or were not re-elected. All played a valuable role on FCC and will be missed. We welcome Jon Ball, Zoe O’Connell and Mary Reid onto the committee as directly elected members. FPC have elected two new representatives onto FCC and we welcome back Linda Jack and Jeremy Hargreaves in these roles. Both have previously served on FCC so are familiar with the way we work. One of the FE reps is also new with Kaavya Kaushik joining James Gurling as an FE rep on FCC.
  • Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2Nd Parliamentary Year

    Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2Nd Parliamentary Year

    Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2nd Parliamentary Year, Session 3 (9 May 2008 – 8 May 2009) SPJ 3.2 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000. Foreword The Journal is the central, long-term, authoritative record of what the Parliament has done. The Minutes of Proceedings, which are produced for each meeting of the Parliament, do that in an immediate way, while the Journal presents essentially the same material but has the benefit of hindsight to allow any errors and infelicities of presentation to be corrected. Unlike the Official Report, which primarily records what is said, the Minutes of Proceedings, and in the longer term the Journal, provide the authoritative record of what was done. The Journal is required under Rule 16.3 of Standing Orders and contains, in addition to the Minutes of Proceedings themselves, notice of any Bill introduced*, notice of any instrument or draft instrument or any other document laid before the Parliament; notice of any report of a committee, and any other matter that the Parliament, on a motion of the Parliamentary Bureau, considers should be included. (* The requirement to include notice of Bills introduced was only added to Rule 16.3 in January 2003. However, such notices have in practice been recorded in the Annex to the Minutes of Proceedings from the outset.) Note: (DT), which appears throughout the Journal, signifies a decision taken at Decision Time.
  • Nicol Stephen Speech to Liberal Democrats Spring Conference 2008

    Nicol Stephen Speech to Liberal Democrats Spring Conference 2008

    Nicol Stephen Speech to Liberal Democrats Spring Conference 2008 As we meet here in Aviemore we have good reasons to be confident. In Nick Clegg an outstanding new leader, with an inspirational first conference speech determined to double our number of MPs at Westminster And in our MPs the strongest team of powerful campaigners. To one of whom I give special mention today. He gave exceptional leadership at a time when our party needed it the most. Menzies Campbell has given huge commitment to this party and we give him our heartfelt thanks. At Holyrood, we now have five new MSPs – a young, positive, dynamic team and most spectacular of all our outstanding success in Dunfermline for Jim Tolson MSP – until this week the biggest earthquake we had seen for a generation. Reasons to be confident And none more so than our growing strength in local government Those Labour fiefdoms swept away after decades of one party rule. Now 13 councils with Liberal Democrats in government And some of Scotland’s most important councils led by Liberal Democrats the great cities of Edinburgh and Aberdeen; Aberdeenshire council all led by Liberal Democrats Our councillors do a fantastic job. We should thank all 167 of them for all that they have done - and do - to build the strength of our party. The biggest reason of all for our confidence and optimism is an enduring one. It is about what unites us all It is about liberalism The rights of the individual, decentralising power, fighting for communities standing up against injustice freedom, fairness, honesty the great values of liberal democracy.
  • STEP up Conference 12Th May 2014: the Lighthouse, Glasgow

    STEP up Conference 12Th May 2014: the Lighthouse, Glasgow

    STEP UP Conference 12th May 2014: The Lighthouse, Glasgow Developing the new Energy and Carbon Masterplan The Glasgow STEP UP team of Glasgow City Council, University of Strathclyde and Scottish Power Energy Networks held a successful stakeholder engagement event for the City’s new Energy and Carbon Masterplan at the Lighthouse in Glasgow on Monday the 12th of May (for agenda see Annex 1). Over seventy representatives from the private, public, voluntary and community sectors in Glasgow attended the half day event to learn more about the developing Energy and Carbon Master Plan. Attendees took part in workshops covering energy efficiency; local energy generation and district heating; transport and waste – each aimed at helping to identify actions for the new Plan. Plenary sessions Councillor Frank McAveety – Glasgow City Council Councillor Frank McAveety, Convenor of Glasgow City Council’s Sustainability and Environment Policy Development Committee, outlined Glasgow’s vision and commitment to becoming one of Europe’s most sustainable cities. Councillor McAveety went on to talk about how the city is focusing on regeneration and transformation to a low carbon economy, which will deliver social and economic benefits to Glasgow’s citizens. STEP UP Project Coordinator Richard Bellingham of University of Strathclyde, outlined the history of the STEP UP project and explained that STEP UP seeks to enhance existing sustainable energy action plans (SEAPs) in the four STEP UP cities of Ghent, Glasgow, Gothenburg and Riga while developing a process for enhancing SEAPs in cities across Europe. He highlighted the value in creating SEAPs in cities aiming to deliver faster progress towards European energy targets whilst also creating jobs, eliminating fuel poverty and ensuring energy security.
  • Register of Lords' Interests

    Register of Lords' Interests

    REGISTER OF LORDS’ INTERESTS _________________ The following Members of the House of Lords have registered relevant interests under the code of conduct: ABERDARE, LORD Category 10: Non-financial interests (a) Director, F.C.M. Limited (recording rights) Category 10: Non-financial interests (c) Trustee, National Library of Wales Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Chairman and Trustee, Berlioz Society Trustee, St John Cymru-Wales Trustee, West Wycombe Charitable Trust Trustee, Stephen Dodgson Trust (promotes continued awareness/performance of works of composer Stephen Dodgson) Chairman and Trustee, Berlioz Sesquicentenary Committee (music) ADAMS OF CRAIGIELEA, BARONESS Nil No registrable interests ADDINGTON, LORD Category 1: Directorships Chairman, Microlink PC (UK) Ltd (computing and software) Member of and Adviser to the Board of X-Forces (XF) Ltd (supporting ex-forces and their families to start up businesses) Category 10: Non-financial interests (d) President (formerly Vice President), British Dyslexia Association Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Vice President, UK Sports Association Vice President, Lakenham Hewitt Rugby Club Trustee, The Atlas Foundation (registered charity; seeks to improve lives of disadvantaged people across the world) ADEBOWALE, LORD Category 1: Directorships Director, Leadership in Mind Ltd (business activities; certain income from services provided personally by the Member is or will be paid to this company; see category 4(a)) Director, IOCOM UK Ltd (visual business platform) Independent Non-executive
  • CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parl

    CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parl

    ANNEXE A: REPORT FROM THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENTARY STANDARDS COMMISSIONER AND ASSOCIATED ANNEXES CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parliament on complaint no. 10C/09 Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 28 September 2010 Commissioner: D. Stuart Allan 44 Drumsheugh Gardens Edinburgh EH3 7SW Direct Tel: 0300 011 0550 E-mail: [email protected] CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report on complaint no. 10C/09 to the Scottish Parliament Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament (“the Code”) has been approved by the Scottish Parliament under its Standing Orders to provide a set of principles and standards for its Members. 1.2 Other relevant provisions relating to the conduct of MSPs include the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”)1 and the Parliament’s standing orders. 1.3 For the purpose of this complaint, the relevant editions of the Code are editions 3 and 4 which were approved by the Parliament in May 2007 and in March 2009 respectively2. 1.4 The regulation of the Code and of the other relevant provisions relating to conduct is undertaken in terms of the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”)3. 1.5 This Report is submitted to the Parliament in terms of section 9 of the 2002 Act. 1 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/acts2006/asp_20060012_en_1 2 http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/conduct/index.htm (edition 4 of the Code) 3 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/Scotland/acts2002/asp_20020016_en_1 - 2 - 2.0 Complaint 2.1 The complainer (“the complainer”) is Mr Ian Gemmell and his complaint is about Mr Kenneth J Gibson, MSP (“the respondent”).