DOCSLIB.ORG

2. the Scottish Parliament 25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2. the Scottish Parliament 25 DEVOLUTION MONITORING PROGRAMME 2006-08 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 Peter Jones (ed.) Honorary Senior Research Fellow The Constitution Unit www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit ISSN 1751-3855 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell and Akash Paun at the Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Peter Jones Honorary Senior Research Fellow, The Constitution Unit, UCL Former political correspondent for The Economist Wales: Dr Richard Wyn Jones & Dr Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Martin Burch & James Rees, IPEG, University of Manchester Alan Harding, SURF, University of Salford The Centre: Professor Robert Hazell, The Constitution Unit, UCL Akash Paun, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme. Scottish Executive All devolution monitoring reports are published at: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution- unit/research/devolution. Contact Akash Paun on [email protected] for further information. Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 Peter Jones (ed.) Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 CHRONOLOGY (SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER 2006) 10 1. THE SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE 17 1.1 Scottish Ministers and the Lord Advocate 17 1.2 The Management Group and Taking Stock 18 1.3 Quangos, Regulation and the Legislative Programme – too much government? 20 1.5 Relocation 22 1.6 Freedom of Information 23 1.7 Academic Freedom 24 2. THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT 25 2.1 Petitions 25 2.2 The Finance Committee – Governance and the Budget Review 25 2.4 Committee Reports and Inquiries (11 September 2006 – 31 December 2006) 30 2.5 Parliamentary Bills (11 September 2006 – 31 December 2006) 34 2.6 Non-Executive Bills 34 2.7 Sewel (Legislative Consent) Motions passed 36 3. THE MEDIA 37 3.1 Media Crisis 37 3.2 Agendas and Campaigns 38 3.3 The Union 39 3.4 Elections 40 4. PUBLIC ATTITUDES AND ELECTIONS 43 5. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS 44 5.1. General 44 5.2 British-Irish Council 45 4 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 5.3 Adjusting the devolution settlement 45 5.4 The Sewel Convention – UK Government response to Committee Report 46 6. SCOTLAND, EUROPE, AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 47 6.1 The USA Strategy 47 6.2 The Fresh Talent Initiative 48 6.3 Malawi 49 6.4 Scotland and Ireland 50 6.5 China 50 6.6 Fair Trade 50 7. RELATIONS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT 51 7.1 Finance Settlement 51 7.2 Local Government Finance Review 52 7.3 Local Government Elections 54 7.4 Housing Transfers 55 7.5 Accounts Commission 56 7.6 Pensions and Pay 57 7.7 Election promise 58 8. FINANCE 59 8.1 Hot numbers 59 8.2 Budget and Growth 59 8.3 Scotland’s Fiscal Balance 60 8.4 Local authority funding and the Business Rate 62 8.5 The Pre-Budget Review 62 8.6 Bottom lines 62 9. DISPUTES AND LITIGATION 64 10. POLITICAL PARTIES 65 5 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 10.1 A thickening plot 65 10.2 Nationalism once more resurgent 66 10.3 Labour, Coalition and the Union Dividend 68 10.4 The Lib Dems’ pick and choose 70 10.5 The Conservatives in the doldrums 71 10.6 After the SSP 72 10.7 Scottish Greens and Coalition 73 11. PUBLIC POLICIES 74 11.1 Implementing Public Policies: do Scots love their fudge? 74 11.2 Policy Styles, Policy Learning and Delivering Mental Health Policy 77 11.3 Physical Health (and visible citizenship) 80 11.4 Public Health 83 11.5 Education and Children 84 11.6 Education and Lifelong Learning 85 11.7 Environment, Fishing and Rural Affairs 85 11.8 Energy 86 11.9 Crime and Punishment 86 11.10 Transport 87 11.11 Public Campaigns, Pilots and Publicity 88 6 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 Executive Summary Peter Jones • Aided by opinion polls suggesting a Labour decline and a Scottish National Party advance, plus some SNP donations by prominent businessmen, electioneering got into gear early. There has been bravura SNP talk of winning power in May, though Nicol Stephen, Scottish LibDem leader, has made it clear that if the SNP come to talk, he will have no truck with holding a referendum on independence. • Labour returned to the negative campaigning of the ‘divorce is an expensive business’ 1999 election theme, and also tried to raise the positive aspects of the Union amidst the somewhat muted commemorations of the 300th anniversary of the Union between Scotland and England. Jack McConnell, Labour first minister, has also raised the prospect of running a minority government, seeking support for a legislative programme on an issue-by-issue basis, a prospect which Annabel Goldie, the Scottish Tory leader has said she might support. • Opinion polls have given the impression that 50+ per cent of Scots support independence. Deeper analysis suggests actual support is in the 30-35 per cent range, correlating more closely with support for the SNP which is up a little when compared to 1999. Labour support over the same period has slumped badly. • The executive suffered two cabinet ministerial resignations, both Labour. Peter Peacock quit as education minister because of ill-health and Malcolm Chisholm resigned after voting with the SNP over Trident nuclear missiles. They were replaced, respectively, by Hugh Henry and Rhona Brankin, both deputy ministers. Colin Boyd, Lord Advocate (head of prosecution service and the cabinet’s chief legal advisor) also resigned and was replaced by Scotland’s first female holder of the post Elish Angiolini, solicitor-general. • Changes in Executive civil service management followed an external review praising some aspects of civil service work but suggested room for improvement at the strategic level and that there were too many overlaps. This was interpreted by the press as a damning report. The Management Group was split into a smaller Strategic Group, setting overall objectives, and a Heads of Department Group, meeting weekly to implement the objectives and trouble-shoot. 7 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 • The Audit Committee and Audit Scotland examined pay awards for teachers and hospital consultants. The teachers’ pay deal was criticised as getting a poor return for a considerable investment in teachers and the consultants’ contracts as having been negotiated at a UK level with little regard for Scottish circumstances. • Newspapers and TV marked the Act of Union anniversary with supplements and programmes, with added piquancy: speculation of an end to the Union; and sales decline of Scottish newspapers versus increased sales for London-based titles. • The media is relishing the forthcoming election campaign, branding it the most open and exciting for years. Newspapers are also particularly interested in more powers for Holyrood, which was ruled out by Jack McConnell in a lecture. • Executive statisticians endured the annual ritual of seeing estimates of public spending and revenues in Scotland being chewed up by the political mincing machine and spat out as either showing that Scotland has a massive ‘black hole’ deficit of £11.2bn (unionists) or that it is political chicanery (nationalists). Economic statistics suggest that the Scottish economy has been closing the gap with the UK average. The Executive’s Total Managed Expenditure is scheduled to be £31.3bn in 2007-08, up 5.2 per cent on the figure the year previously. • Local authorities got an extra funding boost of £201m, granted with the hope of modest pre-election council tax rises. An Executive-commissioned independent review of local government finance ruled out local income tax and recommended a market-value based property tax. This was promptly ruled out by Jack McConnell, first minister, for fear of alienating voters in high-value areas. • Development links with Malawi have been strengthened with groups being set up to improve Malawi’s health care and business development. A Scottish-Irish agreement on boosting science education and other mutual interests was signed by Jack McConnell and Bertie Ahern, the Taoiseach. • Progress in mental health and welfare policy demonstrates four of the positive reasons given for having devolution: development of different administrative styles; faster legislative up-dating; difference in policy-making which has highlighted greater stakeholder ownership of the resulting policy in Scotland; and learning by different jurisdictions of the lessons and results of these differences. • Some of the latest figures on meeting targets for treatment times and reducing death rates from some diseases contrasted with the financial crisis in parts of NHS England suggest that the portrayal of health care in the 2007 election campaign may be a 8 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 mirror image of the 2005 general election in Scotland when the theme was of an NHS performing badly in comparison to England. 9 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 Chronology (September to December 2006) 1 Sept.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Approved Minute of the Meeting of the Cross-Party Group on Palliative Care in the Scottish Parliament
    Approved minute Cross-Party Group in the Scottish Parliament on Palliative Care Convener Vice Convener Secretary Michael McMahon MSP Vacant Patricia Wallace Approved minute of the meeting of the Cross-Party Group on Palliative Care in the Scottish Parliament Wednesday 6 June 2007 at 5.45pm Committee Room 1, Scottish Parliament Headquarters Present: Michael McMahon MSP Belshill & Hamilton (convenor) Roseanna Cunningham MSP Perth Jamie McGrigor MSP Highlands and Islands Douglas Pattullo Office of Jamie McGrigor MSP Philip Atkinson Scottish Health Magazine Dr Paul Baughan NHS Forth Valley Dr Rosaleen Beattie Scottish Executive Health Department Dr Pat Carragher Children’s Hospice Association Scotland Rev Stuart Coates Strathcarron Hospice Margaret Colquhoun St Columba’s Hospice, Edinburgh Lisa Dunbar Western General Hospital Margaret Dunbar St Columba’s Hospice Dr Rosalie Dunn NHS Lanarkshire Shirley Fife NHS Lothian Tom Gault St Andrew’s Hospice Linda Kerr NHS Ayrshire & Arran John Macgill British Psychological Society Dorothy McElroy Ardgowan Hospice Maria McGill Highland Hospice Elaine MacLean Care Commission Irene McKie Strathcarron Hospice Clare Murphy St Margaret of Scotland Hospice Professor Scott Murray University of Edinburgh Dr Euan Paterson NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde Ros Scott CHAS Robert Shorter NHS Lanarkshire Craig Stockton Scottish MND Association John Sweeney Cancerbackup Scotland Hazel Taylor West of Scotland MCN for Palliative Care Elizabeth Thomas St Margaret of Scotland Hospice Anne Thomson Scottish Huntington’s Association
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, 20 November 2020 1 (10.00 Am) 2 LORD JACK Mcconnell
    1 1 Friday, 20 November 2020 2 (10.00 am) 3 LORD JACK McCONNELL (affirmed) 4 (10.01 am) 5 [The Inquiry’s Hearing on Friday, 20 November 2020 was delayed from 6 its normal start time at 10:00 a.m. due to a global outage of the 7 Cisco Webex video conferencing platform. Once the outage was 8 resolved, the Inquiry’s Hearing resumed at approximately 10:33 9 a.m.] 10 (10.33 am) 11 LADY SMITH: We are now able to carry on, but before doing 12 so, I would just like to explain the problem that's been 13 experienced is persisting. It's a global problem with 14 the Webex system, so anybody who is using Webex at the 15 moment is suffering the same problem. It's not our 16 particular systems in this Inquiry. 17 I hesitate to apologise for that because it's not 18 our fault. However, we do have one recording system in 19 place and a back-up recording system in place, so there 20 will be a transcript from today, but it may take 21 a little while to get that transcript up. 22 Now, Jack, I'm sorry. You have heard. Very 23 frustrating. But if we can now get back to your 24 evidence, if that's all right with you. 25 A. Of course. 2 1 LADY SMITH: We'd like to do that. 2 Mr Peoples. 3 MR PEOPLES: Thank you. Because we have lost a bit of time, 4 can I just say at the outset that, as I said earlier, 5 your evidence in the statement is evidence and will be 6 considered and is part of the evidence, but you'll 7 perhaps appreciate that we'll, because of the 8 constraints of time, particularly of what's happened, 9 focus on what's happened in some of the issues that have 10 arisen in the course of the hearing and are of 11 particular interest, perhaps, to the Inquiry and those 12 who campaigned for the Inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Report
    European Committee 3rd Report, 2002 Report on the Inquiry into the Future of Cohesion Policy and Structural Funds post 2006 SP Paper 618 £13.30 Session 1 (2002) Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. European Committee 3rd Report, 2002 Report on the Inquiry into the Future of Cohesion Policy and Structural Funds post 2006 European Committee Remit and membership Remit: 1. The remit of the European Committee is to consider and report on- (a) proposals for European Communities legislation; (b) the implementation of European Communities legislation; and (c) any European Communities or European Union issue. 2. The Committee may refer matters to the Parliamentary Bureau or other committees where it considers it appropriate to do so. 3. The convener of the Committee shall not be the convener of any other committee whose remit is, in the opinion of the Parliamentary Bureau, relevant to that of the Committee. 4. The Parliamentary Bureau shall normally propose a person to be a member of the Committee only if he or she is a member of another committee whose remit is, in the opinion of the Parliamentary Bureau, relevant to that of the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Annual Report 2012–13 Contents
    Scottish Parliament Annual Report 2012–13 Contents Foreword from the Presiding Officer 3 Parliamentary business 5 Committees 11 International engagement 18 Engagement with the public 20 Click on the links in the page headers to access more information about the areas covered in this report. Cover photographs - clockwise from top left: Lewis Macdonald MSP and Richard Baker MSP in the Chamber Local Government and Regeneration Committee Education visit to the Parliament Special Delivery: The Letters of William Wallace exhibition Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee Festival of Politics event Welfare Reform Committee witnesses Inside cover photographs - clockwise from top left: Health and Sport Committee witnesses Carers Parliament event The Deputy First Minister and First Minister The Presiding Officer at ArtBeat studios during Parliament Day Hawick Large Hadron Collider Roadshow Published in Edinburgh by APS Group Scotland © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2013 Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk/copyright or by contacting public information on 0131 348 5000. ISBN 978-1-78351-356-7 SP Paper Number 350 Web Only Session 4 (2013) www.scottish.parliament.uk/PresidingOfficer Foreword from the Presiding Officer This annual report provides information on how the Scottish Parliament has fulfilled its role during the parliamentary year 11 May 2012 to 10 May 2013. This last year saw the introduction of reforms designed to make Parliament more agile and responsive through the most radical changes to our processes since the Parliament’s establishment in 1999. A new parliamentary sitting pattern was adopted, with the full Parliament now meeting on three days per week.
    [Show full text]
  • PAC Report Sets out the Pre-Application Consultation That Has Been Carried out in Accordance with The
    Ambassador LB Holdings LLP June 2020 Craigforth Campus, Stirling Pre-Application Consultation Report savills.co.uk Craigforth Campus, Stirling Pre-Application Consultation Report Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Statutory Consultation Requirements 3 3. Consultation Undertaken 6 4. Feedback from the Consultation Event 7 5. Conclusions 11 Appendices: Appendix 1 – Submitted PAN Appendix 2 – Email to Community Councils and Councillors containing PAN Appendix 3 – PAN Registration Letter Appendix 4 – Newspaper Press Advert Appendix 5 – Newspaper Press Article Appendix 6 – Media Coverage Appendix 7 – Public Event Feedback Form Appendix 8 – Public Event Display Boards Ambassador LB Holdings LLP June 2020 Craigforth Campus, Stirling Pre-Application Consultation Report 1. Introduction The PPiP Submission 1.1. This Pre-Application Consultation (PAC) Report has been prepared on behalf of Ambassador LB Holdings LLP (‘the Applicant’) in support of an application to Stirling Council (SC) for Planning Permission in Principle (PPiP) for offices, retail, leisure, public houses, restaurants, residential, hotel, care home, nursery, car parking landscaping and associated infrastructure on land at Craigforth Campus, Stirling (ePlanning Reference: 100273242-001). 1.2. The proposals represent the culmination of an in depth assessment of the Craigforth Campus and its future role within Stirling and beyond. The resultant vision seeks to deliver a viable and vibrant mixed use campus which creates a regional employment, leisure and residential destination at Craigforth. 1.3. The Site offers an exciting opportunity for expanding and enhancing upon the existing facilities to deliver a new active business campus with improved amenities, public realm and upgraded accessibility with additional employment opportunities for the wider community.
    [Show full text]
  • Bute House the Offi Cial Residence of the First Minister of Scotland
    Bute House The offi cial residence of the First Minister of Scotland Bute House 20pp brochure 02.indd 1 17/07/2017 08:53 Welcome to Bute House ince I became First Minister, I have welcomed thousands of people to Bute House. As the official residence of the First Minister of Scotland, it is here that I host official guests from this country and overseas on behalf of the nation. Bute House is also the meeting place of the Scottish Cabinet and the venue for official functions including meetings, receptions, lunches and dinners. Within these walls, I get to bring together people from all walks of life through meetings with business leaders, public service employees and the voluntary sector, and receptions to celebrate all aspects of Scottish society and success. Every Christmas, I even get to welcome youngsters from around the country for an annual children’s party. All year round Bute House performs a dual role of both residence and place of work for the First Minister. All four of my predecessors lived here too, and their portraits line the wall of the staircase leading to the Cabinet Room. Before the Scottish Parliament was reconvened in 1999, Bute House was home to eight different Secretaries of State for Scotland from 1970 onwards. Many of the key conversations and decisions in recent Scottish political history have taken place within these walls. Even without its modern role, however, Bute House would be of significant historic interest. It was built in the late 18th century, and is at the heart of one of the great masterpieces of Georgian architecture – the north side of Robert Adam’s Charlotte Square.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Argyll and Bute Council Council Legal and Regulatory Support 24 June 2021 Boundaries Scotland
    ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL COUNCIL LEGAL AND REGULATORY SUPPORT 24 JUNE 2021 BOUNDARIES SCOTLAND - REVIEW OF ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 A report was submitted to the Council meeting held on 24 September 2020, detailing the terms of a proposed response to Boundaries Scotland’s initial consultation, which ran for a 2 month period from 16th July to 30th September 2020, in regard to the 2019 Review of Electoral Arrangements for Argyll and Bute Council area. The Council agreed the response and this was submitted in accordance with the 30th September 2020 deadline. 1.2 Following the initial consultation with the Council, Boundaries Scotland considered our response and developed proposals for public consultation, which ran for a 12 week period between November 2020 and January 2021. 1.3 Having considered all the comments submitted as part of the public consultation, Boundaries Scotland have now published their final proposals for Argyll and Bute Council area and a copy of the report to Scottish Ministers is attached at appendix 1. If Scottish Ministers are content with the report, it is anticipated that the proposals will be implemented ready for the Local Government elections in May 2022. 1.4 In line with section 18(3) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 the Council will make copies of the report available for public inspection at suitable locations and will be publicised on the Council website from 10 June 2021 until 6 months after the making of an Order in the Scottish Parliament giving effect to any proposals in the report. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Amicus Curiae of the Senate of the United Mexican States, Et
    No. 08-987 IN THE RUBEN CAMPA, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO GUERRERO, GERARDO HERNANDEZ, AND LUIS MEDINA, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ON BEHALF OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES, THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PANAMA, MARY ROBINSON (UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, 1997- 2002; PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, 1992-1997) AND LEGISLATORS FROM THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNTRIES OF BRAZIL, BELGIUM, CHILE, GERMANY, IRELAND, JAPAN, MEXICO, SCOTLAND AND THE UNITED KINGDOM ______________ Michael Avery Counsel of Record Suffolk Law School 120 Tremont Street Boston, MA 02108 617-573-8551 ii AMICI CURIAE The Senate of the United Mexican States The National Assembly of Panama Mary Robinson (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1997-2002; President of Ireland, 1992-1997) Legislators from the European Parliament Josep Borrell Fontelles, former President Enrique Barón Crespo, former President Miguel Ángel Martínez, Vice-President Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Vice-President Luisa Morgantini, Vice-President Mia De Vits, Quaestor Jo Leinen, Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs Richard Howitt, Vice-Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights Guisto Catania, Vice-Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Willy Meyer Pleite, Vice-Chair of the Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly Edite Estrela, Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet
    MINISTERS, LAW OFFICERS AND Scottish MINISTERIAL PARLIAMENTARY AIDES BY Parliament CABINET: SESSION 1 Fact sheet This Fact sheet provides a list of all of the Scottish Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides during Session 1, from 12 May 1999 until the appointment of new Ministers in the second MSPs: Historical parliamentary session. Series Ministers and Law Officers continue to serve in post during 30 March 2007 dissolution. The first Session 2 cabinet was appointed on 21st May 2003. A Minister is a member of the government. The Scottish Executive is the government in Scotland for devolved matters and is responsible for formulating and implementing policy in these areas. The Scottish Executive is formed from the party or parties holding a majority of seats in the Parliament. During Session 1 the Scottish Executive consisted of a coalition of Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs. The senior Ministers in the Scottish government are known as ‘members of the Scottish Executive’ or ‘the Scottish Ministers’ and together they form the Scottish ‘Cabinet’. They are assisted by junior Scottish Ministers. With the exception of the Scottish Law Officers, all Ministers must be MSPs. This fact sheet also provides a list of the Law Officers. The Scottish Law Officers listed advise the Scottish Executive on legal matters and represent its interests in court. The final section lists Ministerial Parliamentary Aides (MPAs). MPAs are MSPs appointed by the First Minister on the recommendation of Ministers whom they assist in discharging their duties. MPAs are unpaid and are not part of the Executive. Their role and the arrangements for their appointment are set out in paragraphs 4.6-4.13 of the Scottish Ministerial Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Scotland
    SNP Foreign Affairs and Defence Newsletter Edition 3 - June 2021 SNP Push for Peaceful Resolution on Israel- Palestine Tensions exploded between Israel and Palestine in the worst violence since 2014. The 11-day conflict led to the deaths of more than 250 people and hundreds more being injured. Alyn Smith MP raised the subject in the Chamber and called on the UK Government to formally recognise the state of Palestine and boycott Israeli settler goods. He also spoke with the Israeli Embassy to express his concerns about the violence. Watch it here Belarus: There Must SNP Tackling SNP Criticise Hong Be Consequences Disinformation Kong Crackdown In an urgent debate, Alyn Smith MP Stewart McDonald MP has published On the 32nd anniversary of the called on the UK Government to a ground-breaking report entitled Tiananmen Square massacre provide practical aid to human rights 'Disinformation in Scottish Public Chinese authorities continue to crack and democratic dissidents in Belarus Life'. down on human rights and and invetstigate to what extent democracy in Hong Kong. Russia was involved in the The report, the first of its kind in interception of a cilivilan aircraft over Scotland, is Stewart's assessment of Alyn Smith MP spoke at a Belarus. disinformation activity in Scotland parliamentary debate on this issue, over recent years, including with raising awarness how human rights In a blatant disregard for regards to the COVID-19 pandemic are being trampled on and international law, Belarusian and political campaigns. democracy curtailed under a new authorities ordered the grounding of National Security Law. Alyn urged a Ryanair flight between Athens and The report also outlines 9 the UK Government to demonstrate Vilnius.
    [Show full text]