Moving Towards a Healthier Scotland: Newsletter for the Public Health Function, October 2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moving Towards a Healthier Scotland: Newsletter for the Public Health Function, October 2000 Moving Towards a Healthier Scotland: Newsletter for the public health function, October 2000 Introduction Welcome to the first newsletter from the Scottish Executive on the drive to improve public health. Developments in the implementation of the public health agenda are happening apace. The commitment made in “Towards a Healthier Scotland” to bring together the NHS with local authorities, voluntary and community organisations to tackle health inequalities is being met through new developments such as the Healthy Scotland Convention, the White Paper Demonstration Projects and targeting of the Tobacco Tax Health Improvement Fund. Implementation of the Public Health Function Review is well under way with the establishment of a Public Health Institute for Scotland, and ongoing work around public health standards, training and networks. The outcome of the Review of Nurses’ Contributions to Improving the Public’s Health is keenly awaited, and is expected to report shortly. This newsletter is intended to provide an overview of progress to date. It is the first stage in communicating developments to a wide audience and aims to ensure that anyone with an interest in public health in Scotland is kept informed. Implementation Group Following the launch of the Review of the Public Health Function in Scotland in December 1999 an implementation plan was prepared to take the Review forward on a national basis. A Public Health Function Review Implementation Group was formed with a remit to oversee implementation of the Review of the Public Health Function in Scotland, and to liaise with all key stakeholders in the development of the public health function as outlined in the Review. Membership of the Group consists of :- • Chief Medical Officer (Chair): (previously) Sir David Carter, • Chief Nursing Officer: Ms Anne Jarvie, • Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Public Health: Dr Andrew Fraser, • Head of Health Gain Division: Mr Hector McKenzie, • COSLA representative: Ms Oonagh Aitken/ Mr David Henderson, • Health Board General Manager/Health Board Chairman representative: Mr Neil McConachie, • Director of Public Health representative: Dr Lesley Wilkie/ Dr Dorothy Moir, • Dental Public Health Representative: to be confirmed, • Director of Scottish Consumer Council: Mr Martyn Evans, • Director of SCIEH: Dr Ian Jones, • Health Promotion representative: Dr Carol Tannahill, • Academic representative: Professor Raj Bhopal, • Director of Queens’ Nursing Institute: Ms Lis Cook, • Chief Executive, Primary Care Trust representative: Mr A Wells, • Chief Executive, HEBS: Professor Andrew Tannahill, • Chair of Scottish Affairs Committee, Faculty of Public Health Medicine: Dr John Wrench, • Chief Executive, Local Authority: Mr S Watson. Four meetings have already taken place, with the next meeting to take place in February 2001. A Public Health Institute for Scotland One of the main recommendations in the Review of the Public Health Function was the establishment of a Public Health Institute for Scotland which will bring added coherence, energy and expertise to our public health endeavours. The Institute will be located as an arm of the Common Service Agency and based in Clifton House, Glasgow. Running costs of £1m a year will be provided by the Scottish Executive and the recruitment process is being taken forward by the Common Services Agency. Recruitment of core staff has begun with Professor Phil Hanlon being recruited as Director to take up post in January 2001. A Partner’s Council for the Public Health Institute has been formed in order to develop the Institute’s strategic role and agree its work programme. Some Council members were drawn from the Public Health Function Implementation Group to provide representation from Health Board Management, Health Promotion, Local Authorities, Academic Departments and the Scottish Consumer Council with additional representation from the Voluntary Sector, Community Health, Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health and the Information and Statistics Division. Healthy Scotland Convention The inaugural gathering of a planned annual Healthy Scotland Convention took place on 3 July, in Glasgow. Bringing together key partners in the drive to improve Scotland’s public health, the Convention provides a forum for reviewing progress in the implementation of the public health agenda – as set out in “Towards a Healthier Scotland” – and for working through the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. Enabling participants from varied professional and geographical backgrounds to exchange experiences and views is one of the Convention’s key functions. The NHS, local authorities, other statutory bodies, voluntary/community organisations, business and trades unions were all represented at this year’s event. Reflecting the Scottish Executive’s commitment to the cross-cutting public health agenda, it was opened by Jim Wallace (Deputy First Minister) and attended by Ministers Susan Deacon and Iain Gray (Health and Community Care), Sam Galbraith, Peter Peacock and Rhona Brankin (Education and Children) and Jackie Bailie (Communities). “Delivering Together” was this year’s theme and, through a series of presentations, workshops and feedback sessions, participants focused on the practicalities of delivering health improvement through partnership working. There was an opportunity to hear about how the demonstration project, “Starting Well”, would apply a multi-agency approach to improving child health. And following the Scottish Executive’s decision to devote £26m from additional tobacco taxation to health improvement, participants were invited to give views on investment priorities. Ms Deacon took the opportunity to announce that some of these resources would be used to establish the Public Health Institute in Scotland. The next meeting of the Convention will be on 1 June 2001. Demonstration Projects Towards a Healthier Scotland established four demonstration projects which were selected on the basis of bids received from across Scotland; Starting Well, Healthy Respect, Heart of Scotland and The Cancer Challenge. Glasgow Healthy City Partnership is taking forward the Starting Well project which aims to demonstrate that child health can be improved by a programme of activities that both supports families and provides families with access to enhanced community based resources. The project will be implemented through a programme of intensive home-based health visiting, lay worker support and community development. Starting Well will be based within two communities in Glasgow and will, over a three year period, receive £3 million in funding. The Healthy Respect project has been awarded to a multi-sectoral partnership that includes Lothian Health, the local authority, SIPS, youth projects and voluntary organisations. This project will foster responsible sexual behaviour on the part of young people, with emphasis on the avoidance on unwanted teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. As well as area wide work, developments will focus on two recognised areas of deprivation. Healthy Respect will receive up to £3 million funding over a period of 3 years. The Heart of Scotland project has been awarded to Have a Heart Paisley, a multi-sectoral partnership that includes Paisley LHCC, community initiatives, the local authority, partnership forums, academic organisations, Argyll and Clyde Acute Trust and Argyle and Clyde Health Board. It will build on established initiatives to improve the life circumstances of people living in Paisley’s more deprived neighbourhoods, develop area wide strategies to address health related behaviours and offer secondary prevention interventions. Have a Heart Paisley will receive up to £6 million funding over 3 years. Cancer Challenge was assigned to Grampian, Tayside and Fife Health Boards who are taking forward the Scottish arm of the UK Colorectal Screening pilot. The aim of the pilot, which commenced in early April 2000, is to assess the feasibility of introducing a national colorectal cancer screening programme and will target men and women aged 50 - 69 in the three Health Board areas. This demonstration project will receive up to £2.5 m over a 2 year period. The demonstration projects will act as test beds for action, and a teaching resource for the rest of Scotland. Project teams for each of the projects are now in place, a national co-ordinator has been appointed and independent evaluation of the projects has been commissioned by the Chief Scientist’s Office. A multi-sectoral national Steering Group is being established and a website will be developed in early 2001. The Minister for Health & Community Care officially launched the 3 projects over a 6-week period between October and November. The Review of Nurses’ Contributions to improving the Public’s Health Work on the review of nurses’ contributions to improving the public’s health commenced in September 1999. It has been led by Anne Jarvie, the Chief Nursing Officer for Scotland and arose from the White paper Towards a Healthier Scotland. The Review has three aims; To identify the implications of current Scottish, UK and European policy on the roles of nurses, midwives and health visitors in relation to public health To identify and describe current practice in the field of public health nursing, including both routine and innovative practice To make recommendations on the future development of the contribution of nurses, midwives and health visitors to improving the public’s health at three levels: Individuals and their families;
Recommended publications
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet
    MINISTERS, LAW OFFICERS AND Scottish MINISTERIAL PARLIAMENTARY AIDES BY Parliament CABINET: SESSION 1 Fact sheet This Fact sheet provides a list of all of the Scottish Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides during Session 1, from 12 May 1999 until the appointment of new Ministers in the second MSPs: Historical parliamentary session. Series Ministers and Law Officers continue to serve in post during 30 March 2007 dissolution. The first Session 2 cabinet was appointed on 21st May 2003. A Minister is a member of the government. The Scottish Executive is the government in Scotland for devolved matters and is responsible for formulating and implementing policy in these areas. The Scottish Executive is formed from the party or parties holding a majority of seats in the Parliament. During Session 1 the Scottish Executive consisted of a coalition of Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs. The senior Ministers in the Scottish government are known as ‘members of the Scottish Executive’ or ‘the Scottish Ministers’ and together they form the Scottish ‘Cabinet’. They are assisted by junior Scottish Ministers. With the exception of the Scottish Law Officers, all Ministers must be MSPs. This fact sheet also provides a list of the Law Officers. The Scottish Law Officers listed advise the Scottish Executive on legal matters and represent its interests in court. The final section lists Ministerial Parliamentary Aides (MPAs). MPAs are MSPs appointed by the First Minister on the recommendation of Ministers whom they assist in discharging their duties. MPAs are unpaid and are not part of the Executive. Their role and the arrangements for their appointment are set out in paragraphs 4.6-4.13 of the Scottish Ministerial Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre
    EDUCATION COMMITTEE Wednesday 11 January 2006 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2006. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Wednesday 11 January 2006 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE ............................................................................................................................................. 2957 SCOTTISH SCHOOLS (PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT) BILL: STAGE 1 ....................................................................... 2959 EDUCATION COMMITTEE 1st Meeting 2006, Session 2 CONVENER *Iain Smith (North East Fife) (LD) DEPUTY CONVENER *Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con) COMMITTEE MEMBERS Ms Wendy Alexander (Paisley North) (Lab) *Ms Rosemary Byrne (South of Scotland) (SSP) *Fiona Hyslop (Lothians) (SNP) Mr Adam Ingram (South of Scotland) (SNP) *Mr Kenneth Macintosh (Eastwood) (Lab) *Mr Frank McAveety (Glasgow Shettleston) (Lab) *Dr Elaine Murray (Dumfries) (Lab) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTES Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab) Rosie Kane (Glasgow) (SSP) Michael Matheson (Central Scotland) (SNP) Mr Jamie McGrigor (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Mr Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD) *attended THE FOLLOWING GAVE EVIDENCE: Peter Peacock (Minister for Education and Young People) Colin Reeves (Scottish Executive Education Department) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Eugene Windsor SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Mark Roberts ASSISTANT CLERK Ian Cowan LOCATION Committee Room 4 2957 11 JANUARY 2006 2958 think that drafting should be dealt with in private. Scottish Parliament The Procedures Committee has come to the view that committees should be able to deal with such Education Committee matters in private.
    [Show full text]
  • CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parl
    ANNEXE A: REPORT FROM THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENTARY STANDARDS COMMISSIONER AND ASSOCIATED ANNEXES CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parliament on complaint no. 10C/09 Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 28 September 2010 Commissioner: D. Stuart Allan 44 Drumsheugh Gardens Edinburgh EH3 7SW Direct Tel: 0300 011 0550 E-mail: [email protected] CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report on complaint no. 10C/09 to the Scottish Parliament Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament (“the Code”) has been approved by the Scottish Parliament under its Standing Orders to provide a set of principles and standards for its Members. 1.2 Other relevant provisions relating to the conduct of MSPs include the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”)1 and the Parliament’s standing orders. 1.3 For the purpose of this complaint, the relevant editions of the Code are editions 3 and 4 which were approved by the Parliament in May 2007 and in March 2009 respectively2. 1.4 The regulation of the Code and of the other relevant provisions relating to conduct is undertaken in terms of the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”)3. 1.5 This Report is submitted to the Parliament in terms of section 9 of the 2002 Act. 1 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/acts2006/asp_20060012_en_1 2 http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/conduct/index.htm (edition 4 of the Code) 3 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/Scotland/acts2002/asp_20020016_en_1 - 2 - 2.0 Complaint 2.1 The complainer (“the complainer”) is Mr Ian Gemmell and his complaint is about Mr Kenneth J Gibson, MSP (“the respondent”).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Session 3 Msps Not Standing Or Not Returned in the 2011 Election 6 May 2011 Msps: Historical Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet Session 3 MSPs Not Standing or Not Returned in the 2011 Election 6 May 2011 MSPs: Historical Series 48 Session 3 MSPs were not returned to the Scottish Parliament in Session 4. They either did not stand as a candidate for re-election, or they stood but were not re-elected. This fact sheet is divided into two sections. The first section lists those MSPs who stood for re- election but failed to win a seat. The second section lists those MSPs who were serving at the end of Parliamentary Session 3 (22 March 2011) but chose not to stand for re-election. Abbreviation Party Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation Session 3 MSPs who stood for re-election in 2011 but failed to win a seat: MSP Party Constituency (C) or Region (R) Robert Brown LD Glasgow (R) Derek Brownlee Con East Lothian (C), South Scotland (R) Bill Butler Lab Glasgow Anniesland (C) Cathie Craigie Lab Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (C) Ross Finnie LD Greenock and Inverclyde (C), West Scotland (R) Karen Gillon Lab Clydesdale (C) Charlie Gordon Lab Glasgow Cathcart (C) Andy Kerr Lab East Kilbride (C) Marilyn Livingstone Lab Kirkcaldy (C) Frank McAveety Lab Glasgow Shettleston (C) Tom McCabe Lab Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse (C) Anne McLaughlin SNP Glasgow Provan (C), Glasgow (R) Pauline McNeill Lab Glasgow Kelvin (C) Des McNulty Lab Clydebank and Milngavie (C)
    [Show full text]
  • Ag/S3/10/17 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU
    Ag/S3/10/17 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU AGENDA FOR MEETING ON TUESDAY 11 MAY 2010 2.00pm: Room Q1.03 1. Minutes (a) Draft minutes of 4 May 2010 (attached) (b) Matters arising 2. Future Business Programme (PB/S3/10/84) Legislation 3. (a) Historic Environment (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill – Stage 1 referral (PB/S3/10/85) 4. Opposition business allocation 2010-2011 (PB/S3/10/86) 5. Publication scheme – consideration of any exempt papers 6. Date of next meeting – Tuesday 18 May 2010 PB/S3/10/84 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU POSSIBLE MOTIONS FOR MEMBERS BUSINESS 1. Bureau Members will be aware that under Rule 5.6.1(c) the Bureau has a duty to ensure that there is a period of time available for Members’ Business following Decision Time. 2. Motions submitted for Members’ Business are shown below. S3M-6236# Stewart Maxwell: 65th Anniversary of VE Day—That the Parliament commemorates the 65th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day (VE Day) when on 8 May 1945 the Allied Forces formally accepted the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany; honours the contribution by veterans of all ages and from all conflicts; believes that there should be greater recognition of war veterans in Scotland, many of whom sustained severe physical or mental injuries in defending their country, and encourages veterans to take advantage of their eligibility for the Veterans’ Badge, a small, but visible token of society’s appreciation of their service. Supported by: Rob Gibson, Brian Adam, Maureen Watt, Andrew Welsh, Bob Doris, Des McNulty, Kenneth Gibson, Dave Thompson, Tricia Marwick, Stuart
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN MUIR TRUST ANNUAL REPORT for 2005
    JOHN MUIR TRUST ANNUAL REPORT for 2005 2005 On Quinag. Denis Mollison John Muir Trust N Wild Land N Wildlife N Education N Adventure Welcome! N BEHALF OF THE TRUSTEES, I have pleasure in The Journey for the Wild is an example of an inspired O presenting the Annual Report of the John Muir Trust for approach, as is the John Muir Award with over 25,000 certificates 2005. The Director and staff report achievements in 2005 awarded to proud entrants – we are winning. But this is an that deserve high praise. As a team and individuals I continue initiative that we must encourage by combining information and to be impressed by their dedication and commitment to interpretation across our distinctive activities. delivering our objectives. On behalf of all trustees I express our Raising the profile is very much allied to the other objectives sincere thanks. and staff are working hard to address this important issue. With In the Annual Report for 2004, I commented on JMT’s higher populations south of the border we do need to create strategic plan priorities: higher interest in England and Wales and be more welcoming to people who visit our properties. N Develop a secure financial and resource base. Consolidating and assessing land management is now in place. N Respond strategically to threats that affect wild land. All our properties will have biodiversity plans soon, and at Inspire people to value wild places. N Quinag we have an opportunity to set an example for wild land Dick Balharry N Raise the profile of the John Muir Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Sppa/S3/09/6/A Standards, Procedures and Public
    SPPA/S3/09/6/A STANDARDS, PROCEDURES AND PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE AGENDA 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 The Committee will meet at 2.15 pm in Committee Room 6. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 5 in private and to consider a draft report on its Hybrid Bills inquiry in private at future meetings. 2. Cross-Party Groups: The Committee will consider applications for recognition from three proposed Cross-Party Groups. 3. Annual report: The Committee will consider a draft annual report for the Parliament year from 9 May 2008 to 8 May 2009. 4. Review of Section 2 of the Code of Conduct (in private): The Committee will receive a briefing. 5. Hybrid Bills inquiry: The Committee will consider written evidence received. 6. Accuracy of contributions in parliamentary proceedings (in private): The Committee will consider a draft report. Gillian Baxendine/Alison Walker Clerks to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee Room TG.01 The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh Tel: 0131 348 5239 Email: [email protected] SPPA/S3/09/6/A The papers for this meeting are as follows— Agenda item 2 Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Agenda item 3 Draft annual report SPPA/S3/09/6/2 (P) Agenda item 5 Written evidence SPPA/S3/09/6/3 (P) Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/4 (P) Agenda item 6 Draft report SPPA/S3/09/6/5 (P) SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 Cross-Party Group applications Introduction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 12 June 2008 Session 3 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2008. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by RR Donnelley. CONTENTS Thursday 12 June 2008 Debates Col. EDUCATION CUTS ........................................................................................................................................... 9589 Motion moved—[Rhona Brankin]. Amendment moved—[Fiona Hyslop]. Amendment moved—[Murdo Fraser]. Amendment moved—[Jeremy Purvis]. Rhona Brankin (Midlothian) (Lab).............................................................................................................. 9589 The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning (Fiona Hyslop) ............................................ 9592 Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) ............................................................................................. 9595 Jeremy Purvis (Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale) (LD) ........................................................................ 9596 Mary Mulligan (Linlithgow) (Lab) ............................................................................................................... 9599 Rob Gibson (Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Meeting 4 November 2014 (56KB Pdf)
    CROSS PARTY GROUP ON ARCHITECTURE & THE BUILT ENVRIONMENT BRIEF NOTES OF MEETING “Community Control: Gift or Liability? – the implications of the Community Empowerment Bill” At the Scottish Parliament, Committee Room 3 on Tuesday 4 November 2014 at 5.30pm Our Ref: EM R10 Community Empowerment Mtg Minutes 2014-11-04 PRESENT Hazim Amrin Strathclyde University Ian Appleton Marjorie Appleton Neil Baxter RIAS Irene Beautyman PAS Dion Corbett Strathclyde University Eric Dawson A+DS Christopher Dingwall Linda Fabiani MSP Scottish Parliament Douglas Flett, Douglas Flett, Architect Julia Frost PAS Stephanie-Anne Harris City of Edinburgh Council Euan Leitch BEFS Derek Mackay MSP Scottish Parliament John MacLean J M Architect Peter Marshall Perth & Kinross Council David McAllister PAS Liz McLean East Lothian Council Pauline Megson Historic Scotland Ian Menzies Locus Breadalbane Ltd Christine Miller Locus Breadalbane Ltd Andy Milne SURF Russell Moran PAS Eugene Mullan RIAS Hamish Neilson Landscape Institute for Scotland Ann Packard RSA Bill Pagan BEFS Peter Peacock Community Land Scotland Janet Placido East Lothian Council Peter Riddoch Peter Riddoch Architect Dennis Rodwell David Thompson DPT Urban Design Robin Turner RCAHMS John Wackett Locus Breadalbane David Wardrop City of Edinburgh Council EM R10 Community Empowerment Mtg Minutes 2014-04-30 David Wood PAS Jamie Bateman Smith Scott Mullan Associates Ruth Mitchell Smith Scott Mullan Associates Jack Hugh RIAS Kirsty Murray PAS Mike MacKenzie MSP Scottish Parliament APOLOGIES Clare Adamson MSP Scottish Parliament Nick Allan Nick Allan Associates Richard Baker MSP Scottish Parliament Dr Richard Simpson MSP Scottish Parliament Annabelle Ewing MSP Scottish Parliament Fiona Hyslop MSP Scottish Parliament John Knight MSP Scottish Parliament Ingval Maxwell COTAC John McKinney NFRC Scotland Martin McKay Clyde Gateway Flick Monk Centre for Scottish Public Policy Paul Morsley Iglu 1.0 Welcome, Present and Apologies Linda welcomed all present to the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004/05
    annual report 2004/05 www.bord-na-gaidhlig.org.uk 1 1. Highlights in Bòrd na Gàidhlig’s Year ............................................................................................. 2 2. Bòrd na Gàidhlig ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Objectives, Operational Plan and Funding Criteria .............................................................4 contents The Members ....................................................................................................................................5 3. Chairman’s Comments ......................................................................................................................... 8 4. Chief Executive’s Report ....................................................................................................................10 5. Bòrd Na Gàidhlig – The Second Year ...........................................................................................14 Partnership and Alliance ...........................................................................................................14 Gaelic Language Bill ...................................................................................................................16 Language Planning ....................................................................................................................18 The Community ...........................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • The Comedy Unit, and a BBC Scotland Television Series, River City (BBC, 2002-Date)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Glasgow Theses Service Creative Industries Policy and Practice: A Study of BBC Scotland and Scottish Screen Lynne Alison Hibberd BA (Hons), MPhil Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Glasgow Faculty of Arts and Humanities Centre for Cultural Policy Research Department of Theatre Film and Television Studies December 2008 © Lynne Alison Hibberd 2008 2 Abstract This thesis examines creative industries policy in film and television in Scotland. It explores the impact that different approaches to creative industries policy have on creative practice in two media industries, BBC Scotland and Scottish Screen, and reflects on how each of these bodies articulates its role as a „national‟ institution. BBC Scotland is the Scottish branch of the UK‟s largest public service broadcaster, while Scottish Screen exists on a far smaller scale, to serve the screen industries in Scotland. The thesis examines the role of BBC Scotland in sustaining the creative economy and contributing to the cultural life of Scotland. The study of Scottish Screen examines a key early aim of the agency, that of establishing a national film studio. The work investigates the connections between UK and Scottish levels of creative industries policy in light of the debates over the future of public service broadcasting and the Scottish Executive‟s cultural policy framework. The study outlines how ideas of cultural creativity and its economic significance have developed, charts how these ideas have affected policy debate, and explores the extent to which devolution has affected film and television policy.
    [Show full text]