DOCSLIB.ORG

Informe 2015/16 O Estado Dos Direitos Humanos No Mundo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Informe 2015/16 O Estado Dos Direitos Humanos No Mundo ANISTIA INTERNACIONAL A Anistia Internacional é um movimento global de mais de 7 milhões de pessoas que se mobilizam para criar um mundo em que os direitos humanos sejam desfrutados por todos. Nossa missão é que todas as pessoas tenham acesso aos direitos consagrados na Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos e em outras normas internacionais pertinentes. O trabalho da Anistia Internacional é desenvolver pesquisas e campanhas de mobilização para prevenir e pôr fim às violações dos direitos civis, políticos, sociais, culturais e econômicos. Desde a liberdade de expressão e de associação até a integridade física e mental, e desde a proteção contra a discriminação até o direito à moradia – esses direitos formam um todo indivisível. A Anistia Internacional é financiada, sobretudo, por seus membros e por doações privadas. Fundos governamentais não são aceitos para investigar ou fazer campanhas contra abusos de direitos humanos. Somos independentes de quaisquer governos, ideologias políticas, interesses econômicos ou religiões. A Anistia Internacional é um movimento democrático cujas decisões políticas mais importantes são tomadas por representantes de todas as seções nacionais durante as assembleias do Conselho Internacional, que se reúne a cada dois anos. Acesse o nosso site para mais informações – anistia.org.br. Publicado originalmente em 2016 Anistia Internacional Brasil Este relatório documenta o Amnesty International Ltd, Peter Praça São Salvador, 5-Casa, trabalho e as preocupações da Benenson House, 1 Easton Street, Laranjeiras, CEP 22.231-170, Anistia Internacional no ano de Londres WC1X 0DW, Reino Unido Rio de Janeiro - RJ 2015. A ausência de uma seção © Amnesty International 2016 sobre algum país ou território email: [email protected] neste relatório não significa que Índice: POL 10/2552/2016 anistia.org.br nesse local não tenham ocorrido Idioma original: Inglês Grafitto Gráfica e Editora Ltda violações de direitos humanos que preocupem a Anistia Tradução: Anistia Internacional Rua Costa Lobo, 352 - Benfica, Brasil Internacional. Tampouco a CEP 20911-180, Rio de Janeiro - extensão de uma determinada ISBN: 978-0-86210-492-4 RJ seção deve servir de base para A menos que indicado o que se compare a dimensão e a contrário, o conteúdo deste gravidade das preocupações da documento é disponibilizado de Anistia Internacional em algum acordo com uma licença Creative país. Commons (Atribuição- NãoComercial-SemDerivação 4.0 Internacional). https://creativecommons.org/lice nses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Para mais informações, visite a página de permissões em nosso site: www.amnesty.org ANISTIA INTERNACIONAL INFORME 2015/16 O ESTADO DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS NO MUNDO iv Anistia Internacional – Informe 2015/16 ÍNDICE INFORME ANUAL 2015/16 ABREVIATURAS .................................................................................................................. vii INTRODUÇÃO ..................................................................................................................... 10 PANORAMA REGIONAL: ÁFRICA ........................................................................................ 15 PANORAMA REGIONAL: AMÉRICAS ................................................................................... 24 PANORAMA REGIONAL: ÁSIA E OCEANIA .......................................................................... 33 PANORAMA REGIONAL: EUROPA E ÁSIA CENTRAL ........................................................... 41 PANORAMA REGIONAL: ORIENTE MÉDIO E NORTE DA ÁFRICA ........................................ 50 AFEGANISTÃO .................................................................................................................... 60 ÁFRICA DO SUL .................................................................................................................. 64 ALEMANHA ........................................................................................................................ 69 ANGOLA ............................................................................................................................. 71 ARÁBIA SAUDITA ............................................................................................................... 73 ARGENTINA ........................................................................................................................ 78 BOLÍVIA .............................................................................................................................. 80 BRASIL ............................................................................................................................... 82 CANADÁ ............................................................................................................................. 86 CATAR ................................................................................................................................ 88 CHILE ................................................................................................................................. 90 CHINA ................................................................................................................................ 92 COLÔMBIA .......................................................................................................................... 98 COREIA DO NORTE ........................................................................................................... 103 CUBA ................................................................................................................................ 106 EGITO ............................................................................................................................... 108 EL SALVADOR ................................................................................................................... 113 EQUADOR ......................................................................................................................... 115 ESPANHA ......................................................................................................................... 117 ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA ....................................................................................... 120 FRANÇA ........................................................................................................................... 125 GRÉCIA ............................................................................................................................. 128 HAITI ................................................................................................................................ 131 HUNGRIA ......................................................................................................................... 133 IÊMEN .............................................................................................................................. 135 ÍNDIA ................................................................................................................................ 139 INDONÉSIA ....................................................................................................................... 144 IRÃ ................................................................................................................................... 148 IRAQUE ............................................................................................................................ 153 IRLANDA .......................................................................................................................... 158 ISRAEL E TERRITÓRIOS PALESTINOS OCUPADOS ........................................................... 160 ITÁLIA ............................................................................................................................... 164 JAPÃO .............................................................................................................................. 168 Anistia Internacional – Informe 2015/16 v MÉXICO ............................................................................................................................ 169 MIANMAR ......................................................................................................................... 174 MOÇAMBIQUE .................................................................................................................. 178 NICARÁGUA ..................................................................................................................... 179 NIGÉRIA ........................................................................................................................... 181 PALESTINA ....................................................................................................................... 185 PAQUISTÃO ...................................................................................................................... 188 PARAGUAI ........................................................................................................................ 192 PERU ................................................................................................................................ 194 PORTUGAL ....................................................................................................................... 196 REINO UNIDO ................................................................................................................... 197 REPÚBLICA DEMOCRÁTICA DO CONGO ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE CASE for AMERICAN HISTORY in the LAW SCHOOL CURRICULUM Harold P
    Western New England Law Review Volume 29 29 (2006-2007) Article 2 Issue 3 1-1-2007 THE CASE FOR AMERICAN HISTORY IN THE LAW SCHOOL CURRICULUM Harold P. Southerland Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Harold P. Southerland, THE CASE FOR AMERICAN HISTORY IN THE LAW SCHOOL CURRICULUM, 29 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 661 (2007), http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol29/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Review & Student Publications at Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western New England Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CASE FOR AMERICAN HISTORY IN THE LAW-SCHOOL CURRICULUM HAROLD P. SOUTHERLAND* I. THE SHOCK OF RECOGNITION Karl Llewellyn once said that there are always two or more "technically correct" answers to any serious legal question, mutu­ ally contradictory and pointing in opposite directions in a given case.1 He meant that a court can almost always find a technically acceptable way of rationalizing whatever result it wishes to reach. A lot of time is spent in law school in gaining an appreciation of this so-called logical process. Law students learn hundreds of general rules, each with its exceptions; they learn the canons of statutory construction, each with an equal and opposite canon; they learn to manipulate precedent-to analogize cases when favorable, to dis­ tinguish them when not, often by invoking factual distinctions that might strike anyone but a lawyer as irrelevant.
    [Show full text]
  • El Viaje De La Muerte”1
    Informe de la ONG británica Reprieve que sacó del anonimato muchas historias de presos de Guantánamo y cómo EEUU los compró “El viaje de la muerte”1 Más de 700 prisioneros fueron enviados ilegalmente a Guantánamo con la ayuda de Portugal Reprieve, 28 de enero de 2008 Traducido del inglés para Rebelión por Germán Leyens La organización británica Reprieve muestra de modo concluyente que territorio y espacio aéreo portugueses han sido utilizados para transferir a más de 700 prisioneros para ser torturados y encarcelados ilegalmente en Guantánamo. Mediante la comparación de registros de vuelo obtenidos de las autoridades portuguesas,2información del Departamento de Defensa de EE.UU. mostrando fechas de llegada de prisioneros a Guantánamo, y testimonios no confidenciales de los propios prisioneros, 3 Reprieve puede identificar por primera vez a 728 prisioneros enviados a Guantánamo pasando por la jurisdicción portuguesa. La investigación también muestra que Portugal ha jugado un papel sustancial de apoyo en el programa general de entregas [‘extraordinarias’]. Por lo menos nueve prisioneros transportados pasando por la jurisdicción portuguesa fueron severamente torturados en prisiones secretas en todo el mundo antes de su llegada a Guantánamo.4 Vuelos de entregas de prisioneros a Guantánamo pasando por jurisdicción 1 Definición de Adil Zamil, prisionero transportado en el Vuelo RCH108Y que pasó por jurisdicción portuguesa hacia Guantánamo: “Llamo el viaje a Guantánamo ‘El viaje de la muerte.’ Discretamente estuve deseando que el avión se cayera para terminar con el dolor que sentía.” Fuente: “Kuwaiti Gitmo Detainees Speak Out about Abuse” [Detenidos en Guantánamo hablan del abuso], de Rania El Gamal, Kuwait Times, 1 de diciembre de 2006 2 Registros de vuelo obtenidos por Ana Gomes, miembro del Parlamento Europeo, en 2006 revelan que aviones cruzaron en por lo menos 94 ocasiones el espacio aéreo portugués en camino a, o desde, Guantánamo entre 2002 y 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Opendocpdf.Pdf
    联 合 国 A/HRC/36/37/Add.2 Distr.: General 大 会 17 July 2017 Chinese Original: English 人权理事会 第三十六届会议 2017 年 9 月 11 日至 29 日 议程项目 3 促进和保护所有人权――公民权利、政治权利、 经济、社会及文化权利，包括发展权 任意拘留问题工作组关于访问美利坚合众国的报告* 秘书处的说明 应美利坚合众国政府的邀请，任意拘留问题工作组 2016 年 10 月 11 日至 24 日访问了该国。秘书处谨向人权理事会转交关于这次访问的报告，其中载有工作 组关于外来移民、刑事司法制度、基于健康相关理由等方面的剥夺自由现象及关 塔纳摩湾状况的访问结果、结论和建议。 * 本报告附件不译，原文照发。 GE.17-12010 (C) 180717 080817 A/HRC/36/37/Add.2 Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on its visit to the United States of America** Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Programme of the visit .................................................................................................................. 3 III. Overview of the institutional and legal framework ...................................................................... 4 A. Judicial guarantees ................................................................................................................ 4 B. International human rights obligations ................................................................................. 5 IV. Findings ......................................................................................................................................... 5 A. General comments ................................................................................................................ 5 B. Deprivation of liberty in the context of immigration ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • E-Bulletin on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights
    International Commission of Jurists E-BULLETIN ON COUNTER-TERRORISM & HUMAN RIGHTS No. 59, January 2012 AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST Ethiopia: Swedish journalists convicted under draconian Anti-Terrorism Law Ethiopia: Five people, including journalists, convicted under repressive Anti-Terrorism Law Burundi: Journalist arrested and charged for terrorism for interview of rebel leader Kenya: Wave of arbitrary arrests hits Kenya after terrorist attacks and warnings Egypt: Military Council ends emergency law but not for “thugs” Syria: President imposes the death penalty on “terrorist” weapon smugglers Iraq/Turkey: Anti-terrorism airstrike kills 35 smugglers; authorities admit “mistake” AMERICAS USA: Calls for closure multiply, as Guantánamo detention centre turns 10 USA: Indefnite detention of terrorists signed into law with “serious reservations” by US President USA: US President asked to justify US drones strategy by NGO USA: Federal court dismisses Guantánamo torture damage lawsuits USA: CIA torture interrogations whistleblower prosecuted by Justice Department USA: Remedies for torture in court are matters for Congress, rules Appeals Court USA/Italy: No obligation to give immunity to Abu Omar kidnapper, says federal court USA/Afghanistan: Governmental report accuses US of ill-treatment of prisoners in Bagram Canada: More than two years after clearing by Federal Court, Abousfan Abdelrazik de- listed by UN Chile: President accuses indigenous people of “terrorist” arson without evidence Argentina: Generic “terrorism” aggravating circumstance introduced
    [Show full text]
  • Sassi and Ors, Cassation Appeal, Pourvoi No 03-84652; ILDC 776 (FR 2005) Bulletin Criminel 2005 No 1, 4 January 2005
    Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts Sassi and ors, Cassation appeal, Pourvoi No 03-84652; ILDC 776 (FR 2005) Bulletin Criminel 2005 No 1, 4 January 2005 Parties: Nizar Sassi, Sassi Sassi, Khedija Sassi-Makhlouf, Mourad Benchellali, Chelali Benchellali, Hafsa Abderrhamani Date of Decision: 04 January 2005 Jurisdiction/Arbitral Institution/ France, Court of Cassation, Criminal Chamber Court: Judges/Arbitrators: Cotte (President); Vallat (Reporting Judge); Joly; Le Gall; Chanet; Anzani; Pelletier; Ponroy; Arnould; Koering-Joulin; Beyer; Corneloup; Pometan; Guirimand; Sassoust; Caron; Guihal; Lemoine; Ménotti Procedural Stage: Cassation appeal OUP Reference: ILDC 776 (FR 2005) Subject(s): Human rights – International humanitarian law – Relationship between international and domestic law Keyword(s): Combatants, lawful – Combatants, unlawful – Detention – Duty to investigate – Human rights, civil and political rights – Immunity from jurisdiction, states – International law and domestic law, direct effect – International organizations, resolutions – Jurisdiction of states, passive personality principle – Prisoners of war – Terrorism – UN Security Council Core Issue(s) 1. Whether French pre-trial chambers had jurisdiction to authorize investigation of a claim of French citizens held at Guantanamo Bay relating to their capture in a context of hostilities and their detention by a foreign state. Facts F1 In September 2001, the Security Council of the United Nations by Resolution 1368, UN Doc S/RES/1368, UN Security Council, 12 September 2001 and Resolution 1373, UN Doc S/RES/1373, UN Security Council, 28 September 2001, created an obligation for all states to fight terrorism and recalled the inherent right of self-defence for state victims of terrorism. In October 2001, the United States armed forces took position in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 02 March 10.Indd
    ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED NEWSPAPER Sunday 10 March 2013 28 Rabial II 1434 - Volume 18 Number 5634 Price: QR2 WEF’s Executive Cook, Compton Opinion Survey hit tons, lead in Qatar England’s recovery Business | 17 Sport | 28 www.thepeninsulaqatar.com [email protected] | [email protected] Editorial: 4455 7741 | Advertising: 4455 7837 / 4455 7780 Sheikha Moza at CILE conference Released UN Single motor peacekeepers reach Jordan insurance plan AMMAN: The United Nations welcomed the release yesterday of 21 Filipino peacekeepers, who had been seized by Syrian rebels on the Golan Heights, as they for GCC likely crossed to freedom in Jordan after a three-day ordeal. Philippine authorities also expressed relief at the release Draft may get nod at Doha meet of the members of the UN Disengagement Observer Force. DOHA: Plans to have a uni- from one GCC state to another A Jordanian military offi- fied insurance policy for auto- need to buy third-party insur- cial said the peacekeepers were mobiles in the GCC region are ance cover. This is most common greeted by border guards as they in the pipeline and if things in the case of Saudi Arabia which crossed from Syria in the after- go as planned, regional motor attracts a large number of reli- noon and “underwent medical insurance schemes might be gious visitors from the region who examinations.” launched before the year-end. prefer to travel by road. They then boarded an army bus A preliminary draft of the pro- People travelling to Saudi and were given a military escort posed policy has been framed, and Arabia from Qatar by road for pil- to the east Amman headquarters approved by the Gulf Insurance grimage like Umrah, for example, of the armed forces where they Federation at its meeting in must pay up QR100 as third-party were “handed over to the UN rep- Dubai last month.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call to Ensure Safety of Elena Milashina and Have a Proper Investigation Into the Threats Against Her
    A Call to Ensure Safety of Elena Milashina and Have a Proper Investigation into the Threats against Her Statement by the Board of the EU-Russia Civil Society Forum The Board of the EU-Russia Civil Society Forum is outraged by the silence and nonfeasance of Russian authorities in the case of the threats expressed by Ramzan Kadyrov, Head of the Chechen Republic (Russia), against Elena Milashina, a journalist of the “Novaya Gazeta” media outlet. For many years, Elena Milashina has been working for “Novaya Gazeta”. In recent times, she has been focusing on journalistic investigations of human rights violations in the North Caucasus, in particular in the Republic of Chechnya. The threats, which, in our opinion, include death threats, were published on 13 April 2020 on Ramzan Kadyrov’s Telegram account1. The authorship of this publication was not challenged by him. While criticising the media outlet, Ramzan Kadyrov, among others, stated: ‘If you [the security services] want us to commit a crime and become criminals, then say so. Someone will take the burden of responsibility and will be punished under the law. He will be put in prison and released afterwards!’ We suppose that the trigger for Kadyrov’s response was Elena Milashina’s article “A Coronavirus Death Is the Lesser Evil’ that was published a day earlier2. The article tells about a severe situation faced by the Chechen citizens during the coronavirus lockdown. We think Kadyrov’s statement includes a direct threat against the authors of the abovementioned article. Meanwhile, Dmitri Peskov, Press Officer for the President of the Russian Federation, announced that the Kremlin did not consider that statement by the Head of the Chechen Republic ‘forbidden or illegal’ and that he had his right to express himself in that way under current severe conditions3.
    [Show full text]
  • Militaires Et Securite Interieure
    Guantanamo. Sortir du silence, refuser l’impunité. Entretien avec Maître William Bourdon Par Didier BIGO et Christian OLSSON Ce texte est né de la retranscription d’un entretien réalisé en février 2004 avec Me William Bourdon, avocat depuis 2002 avec Me Debray de Mourad Benchellali et de Nizar SASSI, deux des sept prisonniers français ayant été détenus à Camp Delta à Guantanamo Bay. Il a été réactualisé à la fin du mois de décembre 2004 par Me Bourdon lui-même. Il s’agit donc d’un véritable texte d’actualité qui illustre non seulement les enjeux juridiques, politiques et éthiques de la détention arbitraire dans le camp de Guantanamo, mais aussi ceux du sort judiciaire de quatre anciens détenus depuis leur rapatriement en France en juillet 2004. C&C - Pouvez-vous nous rappeler pourquoi l’obligation d’appliquer le statut de prisonnier de guerre aux prisonniers à Guantanamo Bay ne fait aucun doute malgré la position contraire du gouvernement américain ? La réponse est assez simple. Les Etats-Unis sont parties aux Conventions de Genève. Pourtant, ils semblent agir au travers d’une sélection de morceaux choisis de ces conventions en n’appliquant que les dispositions qui sont les moins contraignantes pour eux. Ils en tirent prétexte pour dire qu’ils appliquent le droit international puisqu’ils laissent le CICR visiter les prisonniers et prétendent garantir que les personnes arrêtées sur le terrain des hostilités sont traitées avec humanité. Il est vrai que ce dernier point constitue un élément essentiel des quatre Conventions de Genève: le belligérant ne peut se venger sur ses prisonniers.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing Local TV News
    NIEMAN REPORTS Reinventing Local TV News Innovative stations push to attract younger audiences Contributors The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University Sara Morrison (page 14) www.niemanreports.org has been an assistant editor at Columbia Journalism Review and a senior writer for Boston. com. Her work has appeared on Vocativ, Poynter, The Guardian, The Atlantic Wire, and The Wrap. Her media reporting often focuses on newsroom diversity publisher and innovation. Ann Marie Lipinski editor Marites Dañguilan Vitug (page 8), a James Geary 1987 Nieman Fellow, is editor at large of senior editor Rappler, a leading online news site in the Jan Gardner Philippines. She is the author of several editorial assistant books on Philippine current aff airs. Eryn M. Carlson Previously she was editor in chief of Newsbreak magazine. staff assistant Lesley Harkins Mary Louise Schumacher (page 22), design the 2017 Arts & Culture Nieman Fellow, Pentagram is the art and architecture critic at the editorial offices Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. She is One Francis Avenue, Cambridge, currently at work on a documentary MA 02138-2098, 617-496-6308, fi lm about art critics in the midst of [email protected] technological and cultural transformation. Copyright 2018 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Michael Blanding (page 34) is an author Periodicals postage paid at and investigative journalist whose work Boston, Massachusetts and has appeared in publications including additional entries The New York Times, Wired, The New Republic, Slate, and The Nation. subscriptions/business His most recent book, “The Map Thief,” 617-496-6299, [email protected] was published in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeals Court
    **Unofficial Translation** FILE No. 2014/053374 Extract from the minutes of the Registry of PROSECUTION CASE NO.: PO532808432 the Paris Court of Appeal JUDGEMENT OF 2 APRIL 2015 THE COURT OF APPEAL OF PARIS (COUR D’APPEL DE PARIS) UNIT 7 INVESTIGATION CHAMBER TWO ORDER DENYING MOTION TO GRANT INVESTIGATION MEASURES JUDGEMENT (No. 2, 7 pages) Pronounced in chambers on 2 April 2015 Proceedings brought against persons unknown on charges of arbitrary infringement of personal liberty by a public official causing a person to be detained for over 7 days, wilful failure to end unlawful deprivation of liberty by a public official, arrest, detention and false imprisonment of a person without an order from the established authorities and outside of the framework provided for by law. PLAINTIFFS Hafsa ABDERRAHMANI, Chelali BENCHELLALI, Mourad BENCHELLALl, Khedidja SASSI, wife of Mr MAKHLOUF, Nizar SASSI, Sassi SASSI Who choose their lawyer’s office as their address for service, having as their lawyer: Mr BOURDON, 156 Rue de Rivoli - 75001 PARIS Khaled BEN MUSTAPHA Who chooses his lawyer’s office as his address for service, having as his lawyer: Mr MEILHAC, 14 rue de Milan - 75009 PARIS COMPOSITION OF THE COURT During the proceedings, deliberation and announcement of the judgement: Mrs LUGA, Chief Judge Mrs MERY-DUJARDIN, Judge Mrs DUTARTRE, Judge All three appointed according to the provisions of article 191 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure (Code de procédure pénale). REGISTRAR: during proceedings and the announcement of the judgement: Ms
    [Show full text]
  • Mourad Benchellali
    LUNDI 20 FÉVRIER 2006• DEUXIEME EDITION N° 7709• WWW. LIBERATION. FR emploi Aux Etats-Unis, les employeurs scrutent les blogs avant d’embaucher cahier central Témoignage «Je n’ai pas mérité Guantanamo» Mourad Benchellali, Lyonnais d’origine algérienne, raconte son passage dans des camps talibans en Afghanistan en 2001, avant d’être arrêté au Pakistan, puis détenu et torturé par les Américains à Guantanamo. Page2 Mourad Benchellali, hier. SEBASTIEN EROME.EDITING SEBASTIEN POLITIQUES Grippe aviaire: En Inde, Chirac gêné par la filière s’inquiète l’affaire Mittal-Arcelor P. 15 turin2006 La découverte d’un canard SOCIÉTÉ sauvage contaminé par le Un premier or noir virus H5N1, dans l’Ain, fait «Cerveau des barbares»: le craindre à la filière avicole profil de la bande se dessine P. 18 Shani Davis, seul champion française, qui emploie olympique d’hiver afro- 50000 personnes, une CULTURE américain, gagne le 1000 m en psychose qui entraînerait Yann Arthus-Bertrand passe patinage de vitesse après avoir une baisse drastique de la refusé de participer au relais. REUTERS Et toute l’actualité des Jeux P.24 à 27 AFP consommation. Page 6 au-dessus de l’Algérie P. 33 :HIKKLD=ZUVWUW:?a@m@l@h@a IMPRIMÉ EN FRANCE/PRINTED IN FRANCE Antilles, Réunion, Guyane 1,80 ¤, Allemagne 1,80 ¤, Autriche 2,30 ¤, Belgique 1,20 ¤, Cameroun 1200 CFA, Canada $ 3,25, Côte-d’Ivoire 1200 CFA, Danemark 17 Kr, Espagne 1,80 ¤, Etats-Unis 3 $, Finlande 2,40 ¤, Gabon 1200 CFA, Grande-Bretagne 1,20 £, Grèce 1,80 ¤, Irlande 2 ¤, Israël 13 NIS, Italie 1,80 ¤, Luxembourg 1,20 ¤, Maroc 12 Dh, Norvège 22 Kr, Pays-Bas 1,80 ¤, Portugal continental 1,80 ¤, Sénégal 1200 CFA, Suède 22 Kr, Suisse 2,5 F, Tunisie 1,6 DT.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    INDEPENDENT HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF LEGAL EXPERTS ON MEDIA FREEDOM Appointed by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury at the request of the Governments of the United Kingdom and Canada A Pressing Concern: Protecting and Promoting Press Freedom by Strengthening Consular Support to Journalists at Risk Drafted by: the Honourable Professor Irwin Cotler, PC, OC, OQ © International Bar Association 2020 A Pressing Concern: Protecting and Promoting Press Freedom by Strengthening Consular Support to Journalists at Risk An International Bar Association Human Rights Institute Report 16 November 2020 Drafted by: the Honourable Professor Irwin Cotler, PC, OC, OQ With the executive summary and recommendations endorsed by the members of the High Level Panel of Legal Experts on Media Freedom: Lord David Neuberger (Chair) Amal Clooney (Deputy Chair) Ms. Hina Jilani Professor Dario Milo Professor Sarah Cleveland Baroness Helena Kennedy Mr. Can Yeğinsu Ms. Karuna Nundy Ms. Galina Arapova Justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa Professor Kyung-Sin Park Baroness Françoise Tulkens Ms. Catherine Anite Judge Robert D. Sack, Adviser 2 International Bar Association Human Rights Institute Contents Endorsements 6 Executive summary 7 The importance and imperative of consular assistance as a tool to protect journalist nationals at risk abroad: towards a legal paradigm of home State obligation 9 A legal approach to consular assistance for journalists at risk abroad 10 Journalists’ underlying rights when working abroad 12 What can be done to protect journalists working abroad? 13 TOWARDS A CHARTER OF RIGHTS FOR DETAINED JOURNALISTS: A NEW RIGHTS-BASED PARADIGM 13 PROTECTING JOURNALISTS’ RIGHTS ABROAD: ENSHRINING A CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE PROVISION OF CONSULAR ASSISTANCE BY THE HOME STATE 15 Global accountability through an international commissioner 17 I.
    [Show full text]