DOCSLIB.ORG

Measuring the Distance: the Legacy of the Kerner Report Ri Ck Loessberg and John Koskinen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measuring the Distance: the Legacy of the Kerner Report Ri Ck Loessberg and John Koskinen Measuring the Distance: The Legacy of the Kerner Report Ri ck loessberG and John koskInen On its release in 1968, the Kerner report, with its “two societies” warning, was the subject of intense public attention. However, within a year, concerns arose that the report’s influence was limited and that its recom- mendations were not being implemented. This perception has not changed noticeably since then. Fifty years later, it is important to accurately assess the report’s legacy and whether the nation has avoided becoming two societies. It has become clear, however, that the report has been implemented more than previously thought and that it has been and continues to be influential. It has also been determined that despite prog- ress toward eliminating the disparity between blacks and whites, it has unfortunately not yet been as exten- sive as is needed. Keywords: urban policy, racial discrimination, public policy, civil rights, African American socioeconomic status, riots We know more than we understand. We un- cused the nation’s attention on race and the derstand more than we can explain. conditions of the inner city as no other govern- mental report had ever done. Newspapers led —Claude Bernard with headlines of “White Racism Blamed in It has now been fifty years since the Kerner re- Riots,” network television devoted special cov- port (the 1968 account of the National Advisory erage to the report, and the public rushed to Commission on Civil Disorders, see Kerner purchase copies of it (Lipsky and Olson 1977). Commission) sought to provide a traumatized By the end of its first month, more people had nation with answers as to why the rioting of bought copies of it than the Warren Commis- 1967 occurred. Its unequivocal conclusion, that sion report on the assassination of President discrimination—not radicals, riffraff, or a con- Kennedy during that report’s first month (Ray- spiracy—had been responsible for the rioting mont 1968). Within three months, 1.6 million and its pointed warning that America was mov- copies of the Kerner report had been sold (Lip- ing toward “two societies, one white, one sky and Olson 1977). black—separate and unequal” instantly fo- Yet, even on the report’s first anniversary, Rick Loessberg is director of planning and development for Dallas County, Texas. John Koskinen was commis- sioner of the Internal Revenue Service. © 2018 Russell Sage Foundation. Loessberg, Rick, and John Koskinen. 2018. “Measuring the Distance: The Legacy of the Kerner Report.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 4(6): 99–119. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.6.05. Please direct correspondence to: Rick Loessberg at [email protected], 411 Elm St., 3rd Floor, Dallas, TX 75202. Open Access Policy: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences is an open access journal. This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported Li- cense. 100 fIftIeth ann Iversary of the kerner report Table 1. Kerner Commission Interviewees Individual Position Year(s) Interviewed Fred Harris Commission member 2015 Victor Palmieri Deputy executive director 2015, 2017 David Chambers Special assistant to executive director 2015, 2017 John Koskinen Special assistant to deputy executive director 2015, 2017 Robert Shellow Assistant deputy director–research 2016 Dick Nathan Associate director for program research 2015, 2017 Gary Marx Consultant–research staff 2016, 2017 Jay Kriegel Assistant to commission vice chairman 2015, 2017 Peter Goldmark Assistant to commission vice chairman 2015, 2017 Herbert Gans Consultant 2017 Jack Rosenthal Special consultant 2015 Source: Author’s compilation. many of its supporters were already concerned gins of a horrendous wave of destruction and that the report’s influence was limited and that to understand the nature of race in this country its many recommendations were being ignored (a country that has become even more racially (Herbers 1969). Successive years and accounts diverse since 1968), these questions deserve to have not changed this perception noticeably be answered. Given that three-f ourths of the (Lipsky and Olson 1977; Lupo 2011; Zelizer nation’s present population was not yet born 2016). Many excellent efforts have been under- when the Kerner report was written and so may taken to determine whether the country has not understand how troubling 1967 was (NBC been successful in avoiding becoming two so- said in a documentary at the time that the na- cieties (Bernstein 1995; Shapiro, Meschede, and tion was “in the worst crisis we have known Osoro 2013; Goodman, Zhu, and Pendall 2017). since the Civil War”) or appreciate how things However, because of the complexity of this may or may not have changed, this determina- task, these efforts are frequently only able to tion is even more critical. concentrate on a particular aspect or charac- This article seeks to address these issues. To teristic, such as wealth inequality (De La Cruz do so, the authors have taken their direct per- et al. 2018), rather than provide an overall as- sonal knowledge and combined it with recent sessment. This matter is further complicated interviews with other Kerner Commission par- when some areas (such as the incidence of pov- ticipants (see table 1). They have also extensively erty) show noticeable improvement and others reviewed the status of many of the report’s rec- (such as the ratio of black unemployment to ommendations, researched what happened to white unemployment) virtually no change. other presidential reports from the same era, Fifty years is a point at which we often assess and examined the many ways a government re- the significance of a career, a movie, or a mar- port can be influential. Because statistics do not riage. What then is the legacy of the Kerner and cannot tell the entire story—we sometimes report? To what extent has it been influential forget that data represent actual people—they or implemented? To what extent have we made have supplemented this research with inter- progress since 1968? And what do the people views of African Americans from across the who were responsible for writing the report be- country to see how they view America and how lieve? that view compares with what they (or their par- For a report that sought to explain the ori- ents) may have held fifty years ago.1 1. Twenty African Americans were interviewed for this article with the assurance that their identities would re- main confidential. They were all friends of the authors or friends of friends. Most the authors have known well for at least ten years, and most are bankers, lawyers, accountants, engineers, and administrators. They have lived rsf: the russell sage foundation journal of the social sciences measurInG the d Istance 101 What emerges from this effort is a view that One of the most important decisions that may surprise some—a report that is more in- led to the development of such a report was the fluential that what has been commonly early decision by David Ginsburg, the commis- thought—and an increased understanding of sioner’s executive director, that the commis- what has transpired for black Americans over sion be given every paragraph of every draft the past five decades. section, that these would be read aloud, and that the commission would not move onto the t he Kerner COmmissiOn’s next section until agreement was reached or deCisiOn- maKing process the section had been sent back for revisions. Public opinion polls presently disclose that the This brilliant brick-b y- brick strategy allowed nation is now as politically divided as it has the commission to focus on the matter at hand, been at any time since 1968, and therefore it is enabled the report to become the commission’s especially important to look into how a report rather than the staff’s, and eliminated the need dealing with a matter as sensitive as race could to have a final vote on the entire report (Loess- be unanimous and so bold. It is even more sig- berg 2017). nificant given that at the time little indicated Previous accounts of the commission’s work that this would occur. According to Tom Wicker, and recent interviews with commission partic- the eleven-member Kerner Commission had ipants indicate that the major disagreements “seemed an unpromising group” when first ap- that arose among commission members were pointed, and the conclusions of previous riot not over what was the cause of the rioting, but panel reports had generally been considered on semantics and what should be done to pre- underwhelming (Kerner Report 1968; Platt 1971; vent future rioting. Commission members Fred Lupo 2011). The complexity of the task before Harris, John Lindsay, Roy Wilkins, and Otto the commission also did not lead one to believe Kerner were usually supportive of more ambi- that the outcome of this group would be any tious proposals; fellow members I. W. Abel, Wil- different, John Kenneth Galbraith remarking liam McCulloch, Katharine Peden, and Charles that, instead of appointing a commission on Thornton were typically more concerned about rioting and calling for a national day of prayer their costs or political realities. The commis- as President Lyndon Johnson had done, “it sion’s remaining members—Herbert Jenkins, might have been more constructive to establish James Corman, and Edward Brooke—moved a commission on prayer and declare a national between the two primary groups depending on day of rioting” (Rosenthal 1969). Yet, through the issue. With many key matters decided on a combination of urgency, commitment, re- six-- to fiv e votes, the respect that commission spect, and skillful management, the commis- members showed one another allowed them sion overcame these obstacles and produced a to proceed under what was a very short sched- surprisingly forceful and comprehensive re- ule and to subsequently adopt a unanimous port.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Paradigm for Fairness: the First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts
    1.-.- 3 -4185 00322265-I 9 J A New Paradigm for Fairness: The First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts , P A New Paradigm for Fairness: The First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts H. Clifton Grandy, J.D Edited by Dawn Spinozza I Chuck Campbell National Center for State Courts State Justice Institute t Q 1995 National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656- 160-7 National Center Publication Number 'R- 180 These proceedings were prepared and reproduced with finds fiom the State Justice Insti- tute, Grant Number SJI-93- 12A-C-B- 198-P94-( l -3), for the First NationaZ Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts. The points of view expressed are those of the presenters and author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Center for State Courts or the State Justice Institute. Planning Committee Honorable Veronica Simmons McBeth Chair, Planning Committee Los Angeles Municipal Court, California Honorable Benjamin Aranda 111 Dr. Yolande P. Marlow South Bay Municipal Court Project Director, Task Force on Minority California Concerns, New Jersey Marilyn Callaway Honorable Jon J. Mayeda Director, Juvenile Court Services Los Angeles Municipal Court, California San Diego, California Honorable Carl J. Character Joseph A. Myers, Esq. Court of Common Pleas, Cleveland, Ohio Executive Director National Indian Justice Center Honorable Charles R Cloud Rose M. Ochi, Esq. Norfolk General District Court, Virginia Associate Director Office of National Drug Control Policy Honorable Lewis L. Douglass Honorable Charles 2.Smith King’s County Supreme Court, New York Justice, Supreme Court of Washington Dolly M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ictj Briefing
    ictj briefing Virginie Ladisch Anna Myriam Roccatello The Color of Justice April 2021 Transitional Justice and the Legacy of Slavery and Racism in the United States The murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor in the spring of 2020 at the hands of police have set off a wave of national and international protests demanding that the United States (US) confront its unaddressed legacy of slavery and racial discrimination, manifest in persistent social and economic inequality.1 Compared with previous protest movements in the US, this time, it seems more attention is being paid to the historical roots of the grievances being voiced. Only a few years ago, following the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, protests broke out calling for an array of reforms, such as body cameras and greater accountability for individual police officers. However, across the country, the continued violence against Black people by police highlights that this is not a problem of individuals. It is rather a pervasive and systemic problem that began before the nation’s founding and has been a constant through line in US history from the early colonial period to the present. This history includes the CONTENTS genocide of Native Americans, the enslavement of African Americans, and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Putting an end to this continuing legacy requires an equally systemic response. A Time for Global Inspiration 2 Acknowledgment and Truth To understand what conditions led to the murder of George Floyd, and so many others Seeking 3 before him and since, it is important to analyze the past and put current grievances in Steps Toward Repair 8 historical perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerner Commission Writing Exercise in July 1967, President Lyndon
    Kerner Commission Writing Exercise In July 1967, President Lyndon Johnson formed a National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. The Commission was tasked with understanding why riots were breaking out in different cities across America. The Commission would also provide recommendations on how to address these issues. Their report was finished in 1968 and became informally known as the Kerner Report, named after the Commission Chair, Otto Kerner, Jr., the Governor of Illinois at the time. The Kerner Report stated that the nation was “moving toward two societies, one black, one white—separate and unequal.” The Kerner report called out “white society” for isolating and neglecting African Americans. It recommended legislation to promote racial integration, create jobs, and provide affordable housing. President Johnson, however, rejected the recommendations. Just one month after the Kerner Report was released, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated (on April 4, 1968). Rioting broke out again in more than 100 cities after the Civil Rights leader’s death. Many people argue that some of the pivotal recommendations made in this report still remain unaddressed today. The following is the Summary Introduction from the 1968 Kerner Report. The summer of 1967 again brought racial disorders to American cities, and with them shock, fear and bewilderment to the nation. The worst came during a two-week period in July, first in Newark and then in Detroit. Each set off a chain reaction in neighboring communities. On July 28, 1967, the President of the United States established this Commission and directed us to answer three basic questions: What happened? Why did it happen? What can be done to prevent it from happening again? To respond to these questions, we have undertaken a broad range of studies and investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • William Alsup
    William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 Copyright © 2021 William Alsup, Leah McGarrigle All rights reserved. Copyright in the manuscript and recording is owned by William Alsup and Leah McGarrigle, who have made the materials available under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: "William Alsup: An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle, 2016-2017”. Transcription by Christine Sinnott Book design by Anna McGarrigle Judge William Alsup was born in Mississippi in 1945 and lived there until he left for Harvard Law School in 1967. At Harvard, he earned a law degree plus a master’s degree in public policy from the Kennedy School of Government. In 1971–72, he clerked for Justice William O. Douglas of the United States Supreme Court and worked with him on the Abortion Cases and the “Trees Have Standing” case, among others. Alsup and his young family then returned to Mississippi, where he practiced civil rights law, went broke, and eventually relocated to San Francisco. There he be- came a trial lawyer, a practice interrupted by two years of appel- late practice as an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the United States Department of Justice (from 1978–80). In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated him and the Senate conirmed him as a United States District Judge in San Francisco. He took the oath of oice on August 17, 1999, and serves still on active status.
    [Show full text]
  • Kissinger Associates' Conflict of Interest in Central America
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 10, Number 32, August 23, 1983 Kissinger Asso ciates' conflict of interest in Central America by Joseph Brewda He stands to make a killing in Central America. His resume partners who, along with Kissinger, include: of current financial dealings with that region show him to be • Lord Peter Carrington�hainnan, The General in violation of the "conflict-of-interest" ethics treasured by Electric Company, Ltd.; former foreign secretary, Great U.S. Senators and Watergaters. Henry Kissinger's policies Britain; former chairman, Australia and New Zealand Bank; of genocide aside, the wealth he will gain for himself by former director. Barclays Bank, Rio Tinto Zinc, Hambros imposing those policies as appointed chairman of the Presi­ Bank, and British Metal Corporation. dent's Bipartisan Commissionon Central America make him • Pehr Gustaf Gyllenhammer�hairman, Volvo; ineligible for that position-by all standards of American chairman, Swedish Ships Morgage Bank; director, Skandia political propriety. Insurance; member, Chase Manhattan International Advi­ At present, Kissinger, who was required to formally dis­ sory Committee. affiliate himself from his corporate holdings while Secretary • Robert O. Anderson�hairman, Atlantic Richfield; of State, retains the following paid positions with agencies chairman, Aspen Institute. with vested interests in Central America: • Thomas Jefferson Cunningham III-secretary, Kis­ • Kissinger Associates-·partner; singer Associates; former president, Orion Bank's London • Chase Manhattan Bank�ounselor and former chair­ branch. (The now disbanded Orion was a consortium of Chase man, InternationalAdvisory Committee; Manhattan, Royal Bank of Canada, National Westminster, • Goldman, Sachs & Company-adviser; Mitsubishi Bank, Credito Italiano Holdings, and West­ • National Broadcasting Company-special consultant, deutsche Landesbank Girozentrale.) world affairs and; • Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • HUBERT H. HUMPHREY PAPERS an Inventory of His 1968 Presidential Campaign Files
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Manuscript Collections HUBERT H. HUMPHREY PAPERS An Inventory of His 1968 Presidential Campaign Files OVERVIEW Creator: Humphrey, Hubert H. (Hubert Horatio), 1911-1978. Title: 1968 Presidential campaign files. Dates: 1949-1969 (bulk 1968). Abstract: Files created by and/or relating to the organization and administration of Humphrey's 1968 campaign for the Presidency of the United States. They are an amalgam of files produced by many individuals and organizations, on the local, state, and national levels. Quantity: 122.0 cu. ft. Location: See Detailed Description section for box locations. HISTORICAL SKETCH Nineteen sixty-eight was not a normal election year. Ordinarily, an incumbent president would have an easy path to his party's nomination for a second term, and much better than even odds at re-election Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey had won the 1964 election in a landslide. By 1968, however, opposition to the war in Vietnam was growing, racial tensions building, the economy stalling, and a desire for real change brewing. While many discontented voters listened to independent candidate George Wallace, and Republican Richard Nixon returned from political exile, most young people looked to the Democratic Party as offering the best chance for significant change in 1968. That meant that Johnson would receive more than token challenges to his re-nomination. Minnesota senator Eugene McCarthy became the first candidate to question the morality and legality of the Vietnam War as well as its military and political objectives. College students flocked to his campaign and canvassed door to door in his behalf in the first Democratic presidential primary on March 12 in New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Clergy and Religious Sisters in the Civil Rights Movement
    In Communion with our Brothers: Catholic Clergy and Religious Sisters in the Civil Rights Movement by Shannon Meredith Lampton A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master Arts in History to The School of Graduate Studies of The University of Alabama in Huntsville HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 2018 ABSTRACT School of Graduate Studies The University of Alabama in Huntsville Degree Master of Arts College/Dept. History Name of Candidate Shannon Meredith Lampton Title In Communion with our Brothers: Catholic Clergy and Religious Sisters in the Civil Rights Movement In the history of the civil rights movement there is a great deal of research, narrative, and historiography devoted to African American men and women’s participation, and of the ways African American churches worked in the movement. I researched to find out how the Catholic Church and her people participated in the civil rights movement. My main points of focus were how these men of privilege and women got involved; how the changes in the Catholic Church encouraged or hindered its members’ civil rights’ work; and how historian perceived that work. I learned that the Catholic Church did not change its teachings, but some people were confused and upset by the changes it did make and it kept them from getting involved. I also learned that there is a narrow understanding of what constitutes civil rights and that and marching is not the only way to create change. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are so many who helped and encouraged me in this process. ▪ Dr. Stephen Waring, for patience, long, wandering and often hilarious discussions, the joy of doing a thing well, and the sure understanding of when to put heel to leather and move things along ▪ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LDF Mourns the Passing of Judge Nathaniel R. Jones Former NAACP
    LDF Mourns the Passing of Judge Nathaniel R. Jones Former NAACP General Counsel Served on Kerner Commission, Federal Bench The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) mourns the passing of Judge Nathaniel R. Jones, who died on January 26, 2020 at the age of 93. A dedicated lawyer who helped lead the charge against northern school segregation as General Counsel of the NAACP (an entirely separate entity from LDF since 1957), he was later appointed to the federal judiciary, where he served for more than 20 years. He played a key role in advancing the causes of freedom and equality on two continents, through his decades-long career as a civil rights lawyer and federal judge and as an advisor on the creation of a constitution in South Africa after the end of apartheid. “The long and distinguished career of Nathaniel Jones was based on a simple conviction: that the law must be an instrument that upholds the principles of equality and full citizenship for African Americans that undergird the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution,” said LDF President and Director-Counsel Sherrilyn Ifill. “He grew up in the segregated North, and by the time he was an adult had a clear-eyed understanding of racism in America, and the critical role of the law in challenging and dismantling the infrastructure of racial inequality. Whether he was arguing against school segregation before the Supreme Court, helping the people of South Africa draft a more equitable constitution, or presiding from the federal bench, he embodied the best of our profession.” Indeed, during his ten years as General Counsel for the NAACP, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving Social Crises by Commissions Normally Everthing Goes Well in Our World
    Reich: Solving Social Crises by Commissions Normally everthing goes well in our world. But at night when we are sleeping, sometimes things go wrong. Army ants invade the camp; leopards may come in and steal a hunting dog or even a child. If we were awake these things would not happen. So when something big goes wrong, like illness or bad hunting or death, it must be because the forest is sleeping and not looking after its children. So what do we do? We wake it up. We wake it up by singing to it, and we do this because we want to awaken happy. Then everything will be well and good again. Colin Turnbull, The Forest People ''The report of the Commissionels," said Washington in his sixth address to Congress, 1'·"marks their Solving Social Crises firmness and abilities and must unite all virtuous men." The first commission to deal with a social crisis in America had by Commissions recommended that the President send troops into western Pennsylvania to end the Whiskey Rebellion. As a cartoon of the day put it, sending 15,000 troops into the Allegheny and Monongahela River valleys against a few farmers for the collection of such a small tax was like swatting flies with a meat axe. 2 But social order was at stake; and that commission, like the.scores of crisis commissions which were to follow it, provided the chief executive with a strategy for restoring the commonweal while assuring the public that the problem could, in fact, be handled. Whenever this nation experiences the kind of social crisis that challenges the capacity of its institutions to handle disorder, a commission of distinguished citizens is asked to probe the causes of the crisis and recommend solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • IFE's 2011 International Diplomacy Award Recipient
    ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖IFE’s 2011 International Diplomacy Award Recipient ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖Ina Ginsburg ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖ ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖na has been an iconic behind-the-scenes figure in Washington, D.C. for many years. Members ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖of the diplomatic corps, whether newly arrived, or veterans of Washington service, have ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖Isought out her diplomatic skills and advice, as have members of Washington’s political ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖establishment — on both sides of the aisle. She has arranged countless off-the-record lunches and dinners and gatherings in Washington for artists, designers,
    [Show full text]
  • The Autobiography of William O. Douglas (1980)
    Washington Law Review Volume 56 Number 3 7-1-1981 The Court Years 1939-1975: The Autobiography of William O. Douglas (1980) Ralph S. Tyler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Legal Biography Commons Recommended Citation Ralph S. Tyler, Book Review, The Court Years 1939-1975: The Autobiography of William O. Douglas (1980), 56 Wash. L. Rev. 573 (1981). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol56/iss3/13 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE COURT YEARS 1939-1975: THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF WILLIAM 0. DOUGLAS New York: Random House, 1980. Pp. 434, $16.95. Reviewed by Ralph S. Tyler* Few Americans would claim objectivity on the subject of William 0. Douglas. He inspired powerful reactions. I start by stating my deeply held admiration for Justice Douglas, a respect nurtured at a distance and from his writings. His writings brought Douglas the man and Douglas the Jus- tice close to many who never met him. His words show him to be a man who cared profoundly about the world, its people, his country, and the law. Decades of American law students, particularly those like me who studied law in the 1960's and 1970's, listened to Justice Douglas, whether he was in the majority or, as often was the case, in dissent.
    [Show full text]