DOCSLIB.ORG

1700 J. Postel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Network Working Group J. Reynolds Request for Comments: 1700 J. Postel STD: 2 ISI Obsoletes RFCs: 1340, 1060, 1010, 990, 960, October 1994 943, 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, 758,755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 Category: Standards Track ASSIGNED NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is a status report on the parameters (i.e., numbers and keywords) used in protocols in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. OVERVIEW This RFC is a snapshot of the ongoing process of the assignment of protocol parameters for the Internet protocol suite. To make the current information readily available the assignments are kept up-to- date in a set of online text files. This RFC has been assembled by catinating these files together with a minimum of formatting "glue". The authors appologize for the somewhat rougher formatting and style than is typical of most RFCs. We expect that various readers will notice specific items that should be corrected. Please send any specific corrections via email to <[email protected]>. Reynolds & Postel [Page 1] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 INTRODUCTION The files in this directory document the currently assigned values for several series of numbers used in network protocol implementations. ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is the central coordinator for the assignment of unique parameter values for Internet protocols. The IANA is chartered by the Internet Society (ISOC) and the Federal Network Council (FNC) to act as the clearinghouse to assign and coordinate the use of numerous Internet protocol parameters. The Internet protocol suite, as defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and its steering group (the IESG), contains numerous parameters, such as internet addresses, domain names, autonomous system numbers (used in some routing protocols), protocol numbers, port numbers, management information base object identifiers, including private enterprise numbers, and many others. The common use of the Internet protocols by the Internet community requires that the particular values used in these parameter fields be assigned uniquely. It is the task of the IANA to make those unique assignments as requested and to maintain a registry of the currently assigned values. Requests for parameter assignments (protocols, ports, etc.) should be sent to <[email protected]>. Requests for SNMP network management private enterprise number assignments should be sent to <[email protected]>. The IANA is located at and operated by the Information Sciences Institute (ISI) of the University of Southern California (USC). If you are developing a protocol or application that will require the use of a link, socket, port, protocol, etc., please contact the IANA to receive a number assignment. Joyce K. Reynolds Internet Assigned Numbers Authority USC - Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, California 90292-6695 Electronic mail: [email protected] Phone: +1 310-822-1511 Reynolds & Postel [Page 2] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 Most of the protocols are documented in the RFC series of notes. Some of the items listed are undocumented. Further information on protocols can be found in the memo, "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1). Data Notations The convention in the documentation of Internet Protocols is to express numbers in decimal and to picture data in "big-endian" order [COHEN]. That is, fields are described left to right, with the most significant octet on the left and the least significant octet on the right. The order of transmission of the header and data described in this document is resolved to the octet level. Whenever a diagram shows a group of octets, the order of transmission of those octets is the normal order in which they are read in English. For example, in the following diagram the octets are transmitted in the order they are numbered. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Transmission Order of Bytes Whenever an octet represents a numeric quantity the left most bit in the diagram is the high order or most significant bit. That is, the bit labeled 0 is the most significant bit. For example, the following diagram represents the value 170 (decimal). 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Significance of Bits Similarly, whenever a multi-octet field represents a numeric quantity the left most bit of the whole field is the most significant bit. When Reynolds & Postel [Page 3] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 a multi-octet quantity is transmitted the most significant octet is transmitted first. Special Addresses There are five classes of IP addresses: Class A through Class E. Of these, Classes A, B, and C are used for unicast addresses, Class D is used for multicast addresses, and Class E addresses are reserved for future use. With the advent of classless addressing [CIDR1, CIDR2], the network-number part of an address may be of any length, and the whole notion of address classes becomes less important. There are certain special cases for IP addresses. These special cases can be concisely summarized using the earlier notation for an IP address: IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Host-number> } or IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Subnet-number>, <Host-number> } if we also use the notation "-1" to mean the field contains all 1 bits. Some common special cases are as follows: (a) {0, 0} This host on this network. Can only be used as a source address (see note later). (b) {0, <Host-number>} Specified host on this network. Can only be used as a source address. (c) { -1, -1} Limited broadcast. Can only be used as a destination address, and a datagram with this address must never be forwarded outside the (sub-)net of the source. (d) {<Network-number>, -1} Directed broadcast to specified network. Can only be used as a destination address. Reynolds & Postel [Page 4] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 (e) {<Network-number>, <Subnet-number>, -1} Directed broadcast to specified subnet. Can only be used as a destination address. (f) {<Network-number>, -1, -1} Directed broadcast to all subnets of specified subnetted network. Can only be used as a destination address. (g) {127, <any>} Internal host loopback address. Should never appear outside a host. REFERENCES [COHEN] Cohen, D., "On Holy Wars and a Plea for Peace", IEEE Computer Magazine, October 1981. [CIDR1] Fuller, V., T. Li, J. Yu, and K. Varadhan, "Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC 1519, September 1993. [CIDR2] Rekhter, Y., and T. Li, "An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR", RFC 1518, September 1993. [] URL = ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/introduction Reynolds & Postel [Page 5] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 VERSION NUMBERS In the Internet Protocol (IP) [RFC791] there is a field to identify the version of the internetwork general protocol. This field is 4 bits in size. Assigned Internet Version Numbers Decimal Keyword Version References ------- ------- ------- ---------- 0 Reserved [JBP] 1-3 Unassigned [JBP] 4 IP Internet Protocol [RFC791,JBP] 5 ST ST Datagram Mode [RFC1190,JWF] 6 SIP Simple Internet Protocol [RH6] 7 TP/IX TP/IX: The Next Internet [RXU] 8 PIP The P Internet Protocol [PXF] 9 TUBA TUBA [RXC] 10-14 Unassigned [JBP] 15 Reserved [JBP] REFERENCES [RFC791] Postel, J., ed., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification", STD 5, RFC 791, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981. [RFC1190] Topolcic, C., Editor, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, CIP Working Group, October 1990. PEOPLE [JPB] Jon Postel <[email protected]> [JWF] Jim Forgie <[email protected]> [RH6] Robert Hinden <[email protected]> [RXU] Robert Ullmann <[email protected]> [PXF] Paul Francis <[email protected]> [RXC] Ross Callon <[email protected]> [] Reynolds & Postel [Page 6] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 URL = ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/version-numbers Reynolds & Postel [Page 7] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 PROTOCOL NUMBERS In the Internet Protocol (IP) [DDN], [RFC791] there is a field, called Protocol, to identify the next level protocol. This is an 8 bit field. Assigned Internet Protocol Numbers Decimal Keyword Protocol References ------- ------- -------- ---------- 0 Reserved [JBP] 1 ICMP Internet Control Message [RFC792,JBP] 2 IGMP Internet Group Management [RFC1112,JBP] 3 GGP Gateway-to-Gateway [RFC823,MB] 4 IP IP in IP (encasulation) [JBP] 5 ST Stream [RFC1190,IEN119,JWF] 6 TCP Transmission Control [RFC793,JBP] 7 UCL UCL [PK] 8 EGP Exterior Gateway Protocol [RFC888,DLM1] 9 IGP any private interior gateway [JBP] 10 BBN-RCC-MON BBN RCC Monitoring [SGC] 11 NVP-II Network Voice Protocol [RFC741,SC3] 12 PUP PUP [PUP,XEROX] 13 ARGUS ARGUS [RWS4] 14 EMCON EMCON [BN7] 15 XNET Cross Net Debugger [IEN158,JFH2] 16 CHAOS Chaos [NC3] 17 UDP User Datagram [RFC768,JBP] 18 MUX Multiplexing [IEN90,JBP] 19 DCN-MEAS DCN Measurement Subsystems [DLM1] 20 HMP Host Monitoring [RFC869,RH6] 21 PRM Packet Radio Measurement [ZSU] 22 XNS-IDP XEROX NS IDP [ETHERNET,XEROX]
Recommended publications
  • George R. Lewycky 30 Regent St, Apt

    George R. Lewycky 30 Regent St, Apt

    George R. Lewycky 30 Regent St, Apt. # 709, Jersey City, NJ 07302 [email protected] (646) 252 8882 http://georgenet.net/resume SUMMARY Over three decades of IT experience in various industries and lines of business with assorted technologies, databases, languages and operating systems. COMPUTER EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS Databases: Oracle, SQL Server, ADABAS (relational), dBase III, Access, Filemaker Pro 5 Oracle: Oracle Financials 11.5.7, Utilities, PL/SQL, SQL*Plus, SQL*Loader, TOAD SQL Server: T-SQL, SQL Server 2008 R2/2010/2012, Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio, SourceSafe, SSRS Languages : SQL, VB.NET, COBOL, JCL, SAS/SPSS (Statistics), CICS, ADA/SQL Operating Systems : IBM MVS & z/OS, Windows, UNIX (SCO & Sun), Mac, DOS (PC's), X-Windows, PICK and Primos Mainframe : JCL, MVS Utilities (DFSORT), COBOL, VSAM NOTE: Supplemental PDF’s available for Oracle, SQL Server, Mainframe & ADABAS at http://georgenet.net/resume DATA PROCESSING SKILLS • Data Analysis; ETL Methodology (Extract, Transform and Load); Interfaces, Data Migration and Cleansing • Packaged (Oracle eBusiness, Real World) and Custom/Internal Applications • Developing algorithms, techniques to re-engineer improve the procedure & processing flow • User interaction on all levels including documentation and training • Experience in Multi-Platform environments; Adaptable to new languages, software packages and industries EMPLOYMENT State Government Agency, NY, NY November 1997 to Present Senior Computer Programmer/Analyst Internet Technologies: February 2010 to present Involved in a major team effort replacing a customized Filemaker Pro 5 database/application, used as a customer service tool into a custom intranet and internet application under Visual Studio 2008 and ASP.NET 3.5 with SQL Server 2008 R2 backend in order to expedite customer claims in a diverse customized and complex customer claim processing system within various departments.
  • Validated Products List, 1995 No. 3: Programming Languages, Database

    Validated Products List, 1995 No. 3: Programming Languages, Database

    NISTIR 5693 (Supersedes NISTIR 5629) VALIDATED PRODUCTS LIST Volume 1 1995 No. 3 Programming Languages Database Language SQL Graphics POSIX Computer Security Judy B. Kailey Product Data - IGES Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 July 1995 QC 100 NIST .056 NO. 5693 1995 NISTIR 5693 (Supersedes NISTIR 5629) VALIDATED PRODUCTS LIST Volume 1 1995 No. 3 Programming Languages Database Language SQL Graphics POSIX Computer Security Judy B. Kailey Product Data - IGES Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 July 1995 (Supersedes April 1995 issue) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Ronald H. Brown, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Mary L. Good, Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arati Prabhakar, Director FOREWORD The Validated Products List (VPL) identifies information technology products that have been tested for conformance to Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) in accordance with Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL) conformance testing procedures, and have a current validation certificate or registered test report. The VPL also contains information about the organizations, test methods and procedures that support the validation programs for the FIPS identified in this document. The VPL includes computer language processors for programming languages COBOL, Fortran, Ada, Pascal, C, M[UMPS], and database language SQL; computer graphic implementations for GKS, COM, PHIGS, and Raster Graphics; operating system implementations for POSIX; Open Systems Interconnection implementations; and computer security implementations for DES, MAC and Key Management.
  • Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing

    Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing

    Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing Mary C. Kulas New Computing Structures Strategic Relations Group December 1987 For Internal Use Only Copyright @ 1987 by Digital Equipment Corporation. Printed in U.S.A. The information contained herein is confidential and proprietary. It is the property of Digital Equipment Corporation and shall not be reproduced or' copied in whole or in part without written permission. This is an unpublished work protected under the Federal copyright laws. The following are trademarks of Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, MA 01754. DECpage LN03 This report was produced by Educational Services with DECpage and the LN03 laser printer. Contents Acknowledgments. 1 Abstract. .. 3 Executive Summary. .. 5 I. Analysis . .. 7 A. The Players . .. 9 1. Number and Status . .. 9 2. Funding. .. 10 3. Strategic Alliances. .. 11 4. Sales. .. 13 a. Revenue/Units Installed . .. 13 h. European Sales. .. 14 B. The Product. .. 15 1. CPUs. .. 15 2. Chip . .. 15 3. Bus. .. 15 4. Vector Processing . .. 16 5. Operating System . .. 16 6. Languages. .. 17 7. Third-Party Applications . .. 18 8. Pricing. .. 18 C. ~BM and Other Major Computer Companies. .. 19 D. Why Success? Why Failure? . .. 21 E. Future Directions. .. 25 II. Company/Product Profiles. .. 27 A. Multi/Parallel Processors . .. 29 1. Alliant . .. 31 2. Astronautics. .. 35 3. Concurrent . .. 37 4. Cydrome. .. 41 5. Eastman Kodak. .. 45 6. Elxsi . .. 47 Contents iii 7. Encore ............... 51 8. Flexible . ... 55 9. Floating Point Systems - M64line ................... 59 10. International Parallel ........................... 61 11. Loral .................................... 63 12. Masscomp ................................. 65 13. Meiko .................................... 67 14. Multiflow. ~ ................................ 69 15. Sequent................................... 71 B. Massively Parallel . 75 1. Ametek.................................... 77 2. Bolt Beranek & Newman Advanced Computers ...........
  • Reference & Manual

    Reference & Manual

    DynaPDF 4.0 Reference & Manual API Reference Version 4.0.59 September 16, 2021 Legal Notices Copyright: © 2003-2021 Jens Boschulte, DynaForms GmbH. All rights reserved. DynaForms GmbH Burbecker Street 24 D-58285 Gevelsberg, Germany Trade Register HRB 9770, District Court Hagen CEO Jens Boschulte Phone: ++49 23 32-666 78 37 Fax: ++49 23 32-666 78 38 If you have questions please send an email to [email protected], or contact us by phone. This publication and the information herein is furnished as is, is subject to change without notice, and should not be construed as a commitment by DynaForms GmbH. DynaForms assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies, makes no warranty of any kind (express, implied or statutory) with respect to this publication, and expressly disclaims any and all warranties of merchantability, fitness for particular purposes and no infringement of third-party rights. Adobe, Acrobat, and PostScript are trademarks of Adobe Systems Inc. AIX, IBM, and OS/390, are trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. Microsoft, Windows, and Windows NT are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Apple, Mac OS, and Safari are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. registered in the United States and other countries. TrueType is a trademark of Apple Computer, Inc. Unicode and the Unicode logo are trademarks of Unicode, Inc. UNIX is a trademark of The Open Group. Solaris is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc. Tru64 is a trademark of Hewlett-Packard. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds. Other company product and service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.
  • Pete's Unsung Contribution to IEEE Standard 754 for Binary Floating

    Pete's Unsung Contribution to IEEE Standard 754 for Binary Floating

    File: 19July10 Pete’s Unsung Contribution to IEEE 754 Version dated July 10, 2010 8:21 am Pete’s Unsung Contribution to IEEE Standard 754 for Binary Floating-Point Prepared for the Conference to Celebrate Prof. G.W. “Pete” Stewart’s 70th Birthday July 19-20, 2010, at the University of Texas at Austin by Prof. W. Kahan Mathematics Dept. & Computer Science Dept. University of California @ Berkeley This is posted at <www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/19July10.pdf> Prof. W. Kahan Page 1/18 File: 19July10 Pete’s Unsung Contribution to IEEE 754 Version dated July 10, 2010 8:21 am Pete’s Unsung Contribution to IEEE Standard 754 for Binary Floating-Point Abstract The near-universal portability, after recompilation, of numerical software for scientific, engineering, medical and entertaining computations owes a lot to the near-universal adoption of IEEE Standard 754 by computer arithmetic hardware starting in the 1980s. But in 1980, after forty months of dispute, the committee drafting this Standard was still unable to reach a consensus. The disagreement seemed irreconcilable. That was when Pete helped to close the divide. This is posted at <www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/19July10.pdf> Prof. W. Kahan Page 2/18 File: 19July10 Pete’s Unsung Contribution to IEEE 754 Version dated July 10, 2010 8:21 am “Three Removes are as bad as a Fire.” Benjamin Franklin, Preface to Poor Richard’s Almanack (1758) My office has been moved twice since 1980, so now my notes for the events in question are buried in one of a few dozen full cartons,— I know not which.
  • Wirtschaft Der Verschwendung Die Biologie Der Allmende

    Wirtschaft Der Verschwendung Die Biologie Der Allmende

    Wirtschaft der Verschwendung Die Biologie der Allmende Andreas Weber Öko-logisch: Die wahre Ökonomie der Biosphäre Es gibt eine seit Milliarden von Jahren erfolgreiche Allmendewirtschaft: die Biosphäre. Deren Öko- logie ist jener irdische Haushalt von Energie, Stoffen, Wesen, Beziehungen und Bedeutungen, der die menschengemachte Öko-nomie enthält und erst ermöglicht. Licht, Sauerstoff, Trinkwasser, Klima, Boden, Energie versorgen auch den Homo oeconomicus der Gegenwart, der sich nach wie vor von Erzeugnissen der Biosphäre ernährt. Die Natur ist das gemeinwirtschaftliche Paradigma par excellence. Damit meine ich nicht nur, dass der Mensch mit den übrigen Wesen während einer überwältigenden Zeitspanne nach den Standards einer Commons-Wirtschaft zusammenlebte. Ich bin vielmehr überzeugt, dass die Beziehungen innerhalb der Biosphäre nach Allmendegesichtspunkten verlaufen. Darum kann uns die Natur eine schlagkräftige Methodologie für die Allmende als eine neue natürliche und soziale Ökologie liefern. Eine solche »existentielle Ökologie der Allmende« soll hier skizziert werden. Wirtschaftsliberalismus als heimliche Metaphysik des Lebens Aber von welcher Natur ist die Rede? Um den Haushalt der Lebewesen ohne die Lasten der liberalistischen Ökonomie bzw. Natur-Metaphorik zu betrachten, ist es zunächst nötig, Öko-logie und Öko-nomie des natürlichen Haushaltens neu zu verstehen. Wir können dabei in der Natur eine Entfaltungsgeschichte der Freiheit erkennen, zu der hin sich autonome Subjekte in gegenseitiger Abhängigkeit entwickeln. Diese Auffassung steht freilich im Gegensatz zum gängigen Bild des Lebens und Stoffaustausches in Biologie und Wirtschaftslehre. Wenige Modelle der Wirklichkeit waren in den letzten 200 Jahren so eng miteinander verschwistert wie die Theorie der Natur und die Theorie unseres Haushaltens. Beide Disziplinen fanden ihre heutige Form im viktorianischen England, beide prägten die entscheidenden Metaphern der jeweils anderen.
  • Operating-System Examples

    Operating-System Examples

    OPERATING SYSTEM CONCEPTS Sixth Edition ABRAHAM SILBERSCHATZ Bell Laboratories PETER BAER GALVIN Corporate Technologies, Inc. GREG GAGNE Westminster College JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC, New York / Chichester / Weinheim / Brisbane / Singapore / Toronto ACQUISITIONS EDITOR Paul Crockett SENIOR MARKETING MANAGER Katherine Hepburn SENIOR PRODUCTION EDITOR Ken Santor COVER DESIGNER Madelyn Lesure COVER ART Susan E. Cyr SENIOR ILLUSTRATION COORDINATOR Anna Melhorn This book was set in Palatino by Abraham Silberschatz and printed and bound by Courier-Westford. The cover was printed by Phoenix Color Corporation. This book is printed on acid-free paper. The paper in this book was manufactured by a mill whose forest manage- ment programs include sustained yield harvesting of its timberlands. Sustained yield harvesting principles ensure that the numbers of trees cut each year does not exceed the amount of new growth. Copyright O 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permis- sion of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per- copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (508) 750-8400, fax (508) 750-4470. Requests to the Publisher for permis- sion should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158-0012, (212) 850-6011, fax (212) 850- ISBN 0-471-41743-2 Printed in the United States of America PREFACE Operating systems are an essential part of any computer system.
  • Charitable Company Match List

    Charitable Company Match List

    The Aloha Lacrosse Club is an IRS 501(c)3 non-profit organization. This means that your financial or property donation is 100% tax deductible! There are also many companies in the Beaverton/Portland area that will match an employee's contribution. Please check with your HR department regarding your companies policy to matching your donations! Local Companies that Match Employee's Charitable Contributions Abbott Laboratories GlaxoSmithKline Foundation Paccess Supply Chain Solutions ABR, Inc. GlobalGiving Pacific Power Foundation ACE Foundation Matching Gift Program Global Standards, LLC Piper Jaffary Foundation Ada County Association of Realtors Foundation Portland General Electric ADP Hanna Andersson Portland Trail Blazers Aetna Hewlett-Packard Pepsi Bottling Group Alaska Airlines H. J. Heinz/Ore-Ida Company Foundation PPG Industries Foundation Albertson’s, Inc. Hunter-Davisson, Inc. Allendale Insurance Home Depot Matching Gifts Quest Diagnostics Allstate Houghton Mifflin Matching Gifts Qwest Communications Foundation Altria Employee Involvement Program HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Amgen Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon American Express Intermountain Gas Industries Foundation Rejuvenation, Inc American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Intel REI Ameriprise IBM International Foundation Matching Grants Rockwell Collins Corporation Ames Planning Associates, Inc. Insurance Services Office, Inc. Aon Foundation Matching Gift Program SAP Apple John Hancock Financial Services Sara Lee Foundation Applied Materials Johnson & Johnson Family of Companies S.D. Deacon Corp. Ares Operations, LLC Johnson Controls Foundation Shell Oil Company Arkema Group Starbucks Coffee AT&T Foundation Matching Gifts Center Key Bank Synopsys Autodesk, Inc Kaiser Permanente Matching Gifts Saint-Gobain Corporation Foundation Kaplan, Inc. SBC Foundation Bank of America KPMG Sprint Foundation Bank Of The West SRG Partnership Becker Capital Management Laika Standard Insurance Bechtel Legacy Health System Stockamp & Associates Benjamin Moore & Co.
  • FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002

    FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002

    FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002 FUJITSU LIMITED Annual Report 2002 Annual Report 2002 CONTENTS Consolidated Financial Highlights 1 To Our Shareholders 2 Solution Profiles 10 Environmental Activities 14 Social Contributions 15 Management 16 Five-Year Summary 18 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations 19 Consolidated Balance Sheets 24 Consolidated Statements of Operations 26 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity 27 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 28 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 29 Independent Auditors’ Report 46 Principal Subsidiaries and Affiliates 47 Consolidated Financial Highlights Yen U.S. Dollars (millions) (millions) Fujitsu Limited and Consolidated Subsidiaries (except per share data) (except per share data) Years ended March 31 2001 2002 2002 For the year: Net sales ¥5,484,426 ¥ 5,006,977 $37,646 Operating income 244,026 (74,426) (560) Income before income taxes and minority interests 157,564 (594,733) (4,472) Net income 8,521 (382,542) (2,876) Cash flows from operating activities 596,462 306,571 2,305 Per share (Yen and U.S. dollars): Earnings Basic ¥ 4.3 ¥ (193.0) $ (1.451) Diluted 4.3 (193.0) (1.451) Cash flows from operating activities 302.9 154.7 1.163 Cash dividends 10.0 5.0 0.038 Cash dividends to face value 20% 10%10% At year-end: Shareholders' equity ¥1,214,383 ¥ 853,756 $ 6,419 Total assets 5,200,071 4,595,804 34,555 Note: The U.S. dollar amounts above have been translated from yen, for convenience only, at the rate of ¥133 = US$1, the approximate Tokyo foreign exchange market rate on March 31, 2002.
  • Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis

    Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis

    NPL Report CMMT(A) 152 Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis M. Stewart & M. G. Cain National Physical Laboratory D. A. Hall University of Manchester May 1999 Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis M. Stewart & M. G. Cain Centre for Materials Measurement and Technology National Physical Laboratory Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, UK. D. A. Hall Manchester Materials Science Centre University of Manchester and UMIST Manchester, M1 7HS, UK. Summary It has become increasingly important to characterise the performance of piezoelectric materials under conditions relevant to their application. Piezoelectric materials are being operated at ever increasing stresses, either for high power acoustic generation or high load/stress actuation, for example. Thus, measurements of properties such as, permittivity (capacitance), dielectric loss, and piezoelectric displacement at high driving voltages are required, which can be used either in device design or materials processing to enable the production of an enhanced, more competitive product. Techniques used to measure these properties have been developed during the DTI funded CAM7 programme and this report aims to enable a user to set up one of these facilities, namely a polarisation hysteresis loop measurement system. The report describes the technique, some example hardware implementations, and the software algorithms used to perform the measurements. A version of the software is included which, although does not allow control of experimental equipment, does include all the analysis features and will allow analysis of data captured independently. ã Crown copyright 1999 Reproduced by permission of the Controller of HMSO ISSN 1368-6550 May 1999 National Physical Laboratory Teddington, Middlesex, United Kingdom, TW11 0LW Extracts from this report may be reproduced provided the source is acknowledged.
  • 1977 , Volume , Issue July-1977

    1977 , Volume , Issue July-1977

    JIM 1977 HEWLE1TPACKARD JOURNAL \ m •: "ik, ;», > i © Copr. 1949-1998 Hewlett-Packard Co. Small Computer System Supports Large-Scale Multi-User APL Powerful, interactive APL is now available for the multi lingual HP 3000 Series II Computer System. A special terminal displays the APL character set. by Kenneth A. Van Bree APL (A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE) is an compiler allows computation to be avoided in many interactive language that allows access to the full cases, and eliminates the need for many temporary power of a large computer while maintaining a user variables to store intermediate results. interface as friendly as a desktop calculator. APL One problem that has always plagued APL users is is based on a notation developed by Dr. Kenneth the limited size of most APL workspaces. A work Iverson1 of IBM Corporation over a decade ago, and space in APL is a named data area that contains all the has been growing in popularity in both the business data variables and functions that relate to a particular and scientific community. The popularity of APL stems from its powerful primitive operations and data structures , coupled with its ease of programming Cover: In the foreground, and debugging. Model 2641 A APL Display Most versions of APL to date have been on large and Station demonstrates its therefore expensive computers. Because of the ex role as the principal user pense involved in owning a computer large enough to interface for APL3000, an run APL, most of the use of APL outside of IBM has enhanced version of APL (A been through commercial timesharing companies.
  • A Nation Goes Online a Nation Goes Online Table of Contents

    A Nation Goes Online a Nation Goes Online Table of Contents

    A NATION GOES ONLINE A NATION GOES ONLINE TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 5 Acknowledgements 6 Introduction 8 Chapter 1 UNCERTAIN BEGINNINGS 12 Chapter 2 NETWORKING TAKES ROOT 24 Chapter 3 A NATIONAL NETWORK (…AT LAST) 45 Chapter 4 CANADA CATCHES UP 60 Chapter 5 THE BIRTH OF CA*NET 90 Chapter 6 FROM CA*NET TO INTERNET 104 Epilogue 128 FOREWORD A NATION GOES ONLINE More Canadians are connected to the Internet than any other country. This should come as no surprise, since we are global leaders in information communications technologies and Internet development. We did not get there by accident – we got there by innovation and establishing world class design expertise. Canada is proud of its advanced networking history. As this publication illustrates, we have built an Internet infrastructure which links Canadians to each other and rein- forces the economic and social underpinnings which define a modern nation. Canada’s networking success is one based on partnership and co-operation between the academic and research community and the public and private sectors. The story told in these pages is a testament to this successful approach. It is not the work of a single group rather that of a series of grass-roots efforts that took shape at universities and other institutions in regions across the country. These pioneers worked to connect a population scattered over immense distances, to create opportunity from potential isolation, and to develop regional collaboration and cohesion. That determination spurred much of the early networking research at Canadian universities and ultimately the national partnerships that led to the creation of CA*net, Canada’s first information highway.