Formulation of the Doubt” • Decreed by Judge but Relies on the Parties • Art
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tribunal New Sletter
Formal Process for Marriage Nullity Cases By: Very Rev. Lawrence Rasaian, JCD he Judicial Vicar, together with marriage may be invalid for T the tribunal staff, sends you all A three primary reasons: defective prayerful wishes on the Feast of St. Jo- Catholic form, a diriment impediment, seph. We discuss in this issue the use of or defective consent. In the previous the formal process for marriage nullity newsletter we had discussed the use of Volume 3, Issue 1 cases due to defective consent. Profes- the documentary process for cases con- sor Francis G. Morrisey, OMI, Saint cerning either defective Catholic form March 2019 Paul University, Canada, has written an or existence of impediments for a valid article on the “Formal Process for Mar- marriage celebration. This issue brings riage Nullity Cases.” He explains beau- out the use of the formal process for tifully the use of the formal process for cases concerning defective consent. The a marriage nullity case due to defective formal process is in fact applied for the consent based on a biblical principle, majority of the cases coming to the tri- “State your case and bring your proofs bunal. Anyone baptized or not, who was and let them take counsel together” a party to a marriage may petition to the (Isaiah 45: 21). He highlights further tribunal for a declaration of invalidity of that the primary focus in church court is his/her prior marriage if he/she wishes on “the truth,” rather than justice. Its to remarry in the Catholic Church. Mar- primary focus is on the validity or not of riage nullity cases are handled as con- the sacrament of the marriage, and the tentious processes, even if both parties procedures are designed to enable those want the declaration of invalidity. -
Anatomy of Melancholy by Democritus Junior
THE ANATOMY OF MELANCHOLY WHAT IT IS WITH ALL THE KINDS, CAUSES, SYMPTOMS, PROGNOSTICS, AND SEVERAL CURES OF IT IN THREE PARTITIONS; WITH THEIR SEVERAL SECTIONS, MEMBERS, AND SUBSECTIONS, PHILOSOPHICALLY, MEDICINALLY, HISTORICALLY OPENED AND CUT UP BY DEMOCRITUS JUNIOR [ROBERT BURTON] WITH A SATIRICAL PREFACE, CONDUCING TO THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSE PART 2 – The Cure of Melancholy Published by the Ex-classics Project, 2009 http://www.exclassics.com Public Domain CONTENTS THE SYNOPSIS OF THE SECOND PARTITION............................................................... 4 THE SECOND PARTITION. THE CURE OF MELANCHOLY. .............................................. 13 THE FIRST SECTION, MEMBER, SUBSECTION. Unlawful Cures rejected.......................... 13 MEMB. II. Lawful Cures, first from God. .................................................................................... 16 MEMB. III. Whether it be lawful to seek to Saints for Aid in this Disease. ................................ 18 MEMB. IV. SUBSECT. I.--Physician, Patient, Physic. ............................................................... 21 SUBSECT. II.--Concerning the Patient........................................................................................ 23 SUBSECT. III.--Concerning Physic............................................................................................. 26 SECT. II. MEMB. I....................................................................................................................... 27 SUBSECT. I.--Diet rectified in substance................................................................................... -
Experts in Church Courts: a Role Not Sacred
Experts in Church Courts: A Role Not Sacred John L. Young, MD, and Ezra E. H. Griffith, MD The increasing number of marriage annulments granted by the Catholic Church in recent years is gaining considerable public attention and arousing some controversy. I Members of the church's clergy2 and hierarchy3 have also expressed concern. This is not surprising in view of the actual data, as shown in Figure 1. Such data give the appearance of a decrease in the emphasis being placed on the permanence of marriage, a well-known church doctrine. Moreover, it is a significant change for some eight million divorced American Catholics that divorce, especially when combined with remar riage, might not mean separation from the church.4 Some have attributed the striking increase to the rising divorce rate; others to the renewal in church life associated with the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. 5 This renewal encouraged an enrichment in under standing of marriage as well as a flourishing ministry to the increasing number of divorced Catholics. In addition, a much earlier and less widely known trend is of more fundamental importance. Shortly after World War II, the Sacred Roman Rota, the church's court of final resort in marriage cases, began to emphasize the psychologic requirements for a valid marriage6 and to encourage the use of psychiatric experts in the hearing of marriage cases. 7 The public's increasing attention to the phenomenon of growing annul ment rates stands in contrast to the psychiatric literature's virtual silence on the expert's role in this process. -
Office of the Tribunal TERMS USED in MARRIAGE CASES
Office of the Tribunal 215 N. Westnedge Street, Kalamazoo MI 49007-3760; 269-903-0215 TERMS USED IN MARRIAGE CASES Affirmative and negative decision. An affirmative decision means the Tribunal or Bishop has found a marriage to be proven invalid according to Church law, with more certainty. A negative decision means that invalidity has not been proven. Assessor. Tribunal official who helps evaluate proofs (evidence) for the Tribunal or Bishop who will judge the marriage case. Case name. To clearly identify a case, the last name of the man and the maiden name of the woman are used in conjunction with the case number (see below). Refer to both when contacting the Tribunal. Case number. A control number that identifies the case in conjunction with the case name (above). Refer to both when contacting the Tribunal. Code of Canon Law and Dignatis Connubii. The source of Catholic Church laws regulating marriage cases. College of judges. Panel of three judges who decide the case in an ordinary process. These are the presiding judge, the ponens and the associate judge. The ponens directs the process and commits the decision of the college to a written sentence. Decree or declaration of nullity or invalidity. A judgment by church authority that a marriage thought valid according to Catholic Church law, actually lacked at least one essential element required for a valid, binding union. Often but imprecisely called annulment. To declare the nullity of marriage is absolutely different from decreeing the annulment of the marriage. Defender of the Bond. Tribunal official who must review the case and present any reasonable arguments or observations, always respecting the truth, that contribute to protecting the bond of marriage and the integrity of the legal process. -
HISTORY of the NATIONAL CATHOLIC COMMITTEE for GIRL SCOUTS and CAMP FIRE by Virginia Reed
Revised 3/11/2019 HISTORY OF THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC COMMITTEE FOR GIRL SCOUTS AND CAMP FIRE By Virginia Reed The present National Catholic Committee for Girl Scouts and Camp Fire dates back to the early days of the Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) and the National Catholic Welfare Conference. Although it has functioned in various capacities and under several different names, this committee's purpose has remained the same: to minister to the Catholic girls in Girl Scouts (at first) and Camp Fire (since 1973). Beginnings The relationship between Girl Scouting and Catholic youth ministry is the result of the foresight of Juliette Gordon Low. Soon after founding the Girl Scout movement in 1912, Low traveled to Baltimore to meet James Cardinal Gibbons and consult with him about her project. Five years later, Joseph Patrick Cardinal Hayes of New York appointed a representative to the Girl Scout National Board of Directors. The cardinal wanted to determine whether the Girl Scout program, which was so fine in theory, was equally sound in practice. Satisfied on this point, His Eminence publicly declared the program suitable for Catholic girls. In due course, the four U.S. Cardinals and the U.S. Catholic hierarchy followed suit. In the early 1920's, Girl Scout troops were formed in parochial schools and Catholic women eagerly became leaders in the program. When CYO was established in the early 1930's, Girl Scouting became its ally as a separate cooperative enterprise. In 1936, sociologist Father Edward Roberts Moore of Catholic charities, Archdiocese of New York, studied and approved the Girl Scout program because it was fitting for girls to beome "participating citizens in a modern, social democracy." This support further enhanced the relationship between the Catholic church and Girl Scouting. -
Canonical Aspects of the Relationship Between the Patriarch and the Synod of Bishops in a Patriarchal Church
CANONICAL ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATRIARCH AND THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS IN A PATRIARCHAL CHURCH by James SALAMY Research Seminar – DCA 6395 Prof. John HUELS Faculty of Canon Law Saint Paul University Ottawa 2018 © James Salamy_2018 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – A PERICHORESIS OF THE ONE AND THE MANY ........................................................1 1.1 – Practical Advantages .........................................................................................................1 1.2 – Definitions.........................................................................................................................1 1.2.1 – Patriarch ...................................................................................................................1 1.2.2 – Synod of Bishops .....................................................................................................8 2 – THE POWERS OF THE PATRIARCH AND THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS ..................12 2.1 – Intermediate Authority ....................................................................................................12 2.2 – In Relation to the Patriarchal Territory ...........................................................................15 2.2.1 – Inside the Patriarchal Territory ..............................................................................19 2.2.2 – Outside of the Patriarchal Territory .......................................................................27 3 – THE ALLOCATION OF POWER ......................................................................................32 -
Tanulmányt Alap
'W,- Ö -χ "V& > f\ • % :\i.\<; YA iíoiísza(ÍI Κ I I; Л Ь A I TANULMÁNYT ALAP \ í \i 1 í ^M'íi^i íí'k'Vi ^rjl'x" • ч r • M /w i i ι ΛΙ Γ,ΓνΜ χ, i l i, Λ EIN r \ Ι UN : \'I '/ Jο^ ιv i' ,·л \ τi JA w. »g ? .· νν тi м\ Ул V wO/jу Vί 71\ ϊ ilί i \ i Τ ? VEZÉ KORMÁNYOK. \ r~ \ ι X / \ / \ Λ VALLAS KS ΚΟΖΟΚΤΛΤΑΚΠίΥΙ Μ. Κ11. MIXI ST КI ί MK< Míi/ASÁI'.OL. Ρ UDAPESTEN. NYOMATOTT Λ ΜΛΟΥΛΙί ΚίΙί. J.OYΈΤΚΜΙ KÖN ΥΥΝ ΥΟ.ΜΟΛΒΛΧ. № η V' Y. 1 S A f) ' V Ov ' 4 9 / ; 4: с f А ζ' г χ' {1 ί f ί A MAGYARORSZÁGI KIR TANULMÁNYI ALAP JOGI r _ r r, TERMESZETENEK MEGVIZSGÁL AS ARA SZOLGÁLÓ YE ZÉRÓK MÁN Y OK. A VALLÁS ÉS KÖZOKTATÁSÜGYI M. KIR. MINISTER MEGBÍZÁSÁBÓL. ÁLL. POLGÁRI I3K. TANI10KÉPZÖ INT. KÖNYVTÁRA jf Érteett: 19 dÂÂ^s1 Leltári szÁm Csoportszám·^ | BUDAPESTEN. NYOMATOTT A MAGYAR KIR. EGYETEMI KÖNYVNYOMDÁBAN. A magyarországi kir. tanulmányi alapjogi természetének megvizsgálására szolgáló vezérokmányok jegyzéke. Lap. Lap. I. XIV. Kelemen pápának a jezsuita-rend meg- IX. D. e. Mária Terézia római császárné és ma- szüntetése iránt 1773.* évi julius 21-én kiadott gyar királynő alapitó-levele 1780. évi marczius brevéje 1 25-éről a jezsuita-rend vagyonából a magyar és horvát tanulmányi alap alakítása, és a magyar II. D. e. Mária Terézia római császárné és magyar tanulmányi és az egyetemi alap némely javainak királynőnek a m. k. helytartótanácshoz 1773. kicserélése iránt 35 évi september 20-án intézett leirata, melylyel a megszüntetett jezsuita-rend vagyonának a X. -
Declaring a Marriage Null (Decree of Nullity Process)
DECLARING A MARRIAGE NULL 2020 EDITION INTRODUCTION You, or someone you love, values life in the Catholic Church. Those who choose to participate in the process of seeking a declaration of nullity are choosing an opportunity for a fuller expression of their faith in the church, or are allowing their loved one to experience peace of mind regarding divorce and the possibility of remarriage. It is comforting to know that Christian marriage, as one of the church’s seven sacraments, is precious to us, and a real symbol of God’s love for humanity. That is why it is so important to preserve the integrity of the sacrament. In order for a marriage to qualify as a true marriage, it needs to be a lifelong and faithful union of a man and a woman that is modeled after Christ’s love for the church. In that way it must be ordered toward the good of the spouses, the growth and support of the love relationship, and its fruitfulness in bearing and educating children. Like God’s love, marriage is creative and life giving. It invites us to come into contact with the presence and power of God. As divorce rates indicate, many couples do not reach the completion of their matrimonial commitment. The church is sensitive to this problem and strives to be responsive to the needs of these individuals so that they may live good and productive lives in the church and in society. WHAT IS A DECLARATION OF NULLITY? A declaration of nullity by the church, or as it is more commonly called, an annulment, is an acknowledgment that a particular couple never achieved a full marriage commitment. -
Form: Rcia Supplemental Marriage Information
DOCUMENT 615C FORM: RCIA SUPPLEMENTAL MARRIAGE INFORMATION PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY -- CORRECT SPELLING OF NAMES IS MOST IMPORTANT Current Last Name: Maiden Name (if applicable): Given Name(s): Sex □ M □ F CURRENT MARITAL STATUS: ✓ all applicable items □ Engaged to be Married (Complete Section I) □ Currently Married by Religious Service; Civil; etc (Complete Section II) □ Previously Married (Complete Section III) □ Current Fiancé(e) or Spouse was previously married (Complete Section III) SECTION I | ENGAGED TO BE MARRIED 1) Will this be your first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete SECTION III. 2) Name of Fiancé(e): 3) Is this your Fiancé(e)’s first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete SECTION III. 4) Is your Fiancé(e) baptized? □ Yes □ No; If Yes, what Christian denomination? 5) If no, what faith tradition (if any) does he/she identify with? 6) In what kind of celebration or ritual will your upcoming marriage be witnessed? □ Catholic (Latin or Eastern Rite); □ Orthodox; □ Christian (Other); □ Religion (Other); | □ Civil/Non-Faith. Notations (if any): 7) Who will preside at your wedding? □ Priest/Deacon; □ Non-Catholic Minister; □ Justice of the Peace; □ Other: 8) If you are wanting your marriage recognized by the Catholic Church, have you discussed either of the following with your Parish Priest?: □ a Marriage Dispensation; □ a Convalidation (“Blessing”) 615C- Supplemental Marriage Information 2018/03 Page 1 of 4 DOCUMENT 615C SECTION II | CURRENT MARRIAGE (RELIGIOUS SERVICE: CIVIL; ETC.): 1) Is this your first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete Section III. 2) Name of Spouse: 3) Is this your Spouse’s first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete Section III. -
1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Course Teacher Prof. Josip Šalković
1. GENERAL INFORMATION Prof. Josip Šalković, PhD / 1.1. Course teacher 1.6. Year of the study programme 3 Assist. Prof. Lucija Boljat, PhD 1.2. Name of the course Canon Law 1.7. Credits (ECTS) 6 1.3. Associate teachers 1.8. Type of instruction (number of hours L + S + E + e-learning) 60 L 1.4. Study programme (undergraduate, graduate, Undergraduate 1.9. Expected enrolment in the course 40 integrated) 1.10. Level of application of e-learning (level 1, 2, 3), percentage of 1.5. Status of the course Compulsory online instruction (max. 20%) 2. COURSE DESCRIPTION To capacitate students and direct them to know, understand, comment and apply the provisions of Canon Law of the Latin Church, 2.1. Course particularly the 1983 Code of Canon Law which is inseparable from the mission of RI teachers in primary and secondary schools or objectives the mission of catechists in parish and deacon communities and finally the mission of the lay parish associate. 2.2. Course enrolment requirements and To have a fundamental knowledge of Church history, exegesis, dogma, philosophy and fundamental theology. entry competences required for the To have a fundamental knowledge of Latin. course To apply their knowledge of Canon Law in all curriculums when planning and conducting RI classes in primary and 2.3. Learning outcomes at the secondary schools; level of the programme to To apply their knowledge of Canon Law in pastoral activities with children, adolescents and adults; which the course contributes To interpret and apply Canon Law in the Church and society, in the school and in the parish community; To capacitate students to actively and properly participate in the task of evangelisation in the Church and society. -
DECEMBER 2016 Catholic Diocese Of
Catholic Diocese of Richmond Instruction for Marriage Catholic Diocese of Richmond 7800 Carousel Lane Richmond, Virginia 23294-4201 DECEMBER 2016 Letter from Bishop DiLorenzo Diocese of Richmond Pastoral Center • 7800 Carousel Lane, Richmond, Virginia 23294-4201 • Phone: (804) 359-5661 • Fax: (804) 358-9159 Office of the Bishop Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ, I enthusiastically present this revision of the Marriage Instruction for the preparation of couples to be married in the Diocese of Richmond. This instruction has been updated in accord with the new English translation of The Order of Celebrating Matrimony. Priests, deacons, and the entire Christian community have a great responsibility to preserve the integrity of the family. A primary way to accomplish this goal is by forming engaged couples in the vocation of marriage. The following instruction seeks to assist those in the Diocese of Richmond who are primarily responsible for preparing couples for marriage. This document represents a development of the previous printing of this instruction in a few key areas; namely, an expanded scope of marriage formation, convalidation recommendations, requirements for entering sacramental records, synthesis of the process for immediate formation, an emphasis on marriage as an opportunity for evangelization, recommendations for couples who are cohabiting, updated liturgical guidelines, and an updated FAQ section. I hope it will provide a more comprehensive approach to marriage formation in the Diocese of Richmond so that marriage may continue to enrich our local Church and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Full implementation of this diocesan Instruction for Marriage will enrich parish communities, the couples who present themselves for marriage, and their families. -
Pastoral Outreach to Christian Marriage: FORMATION, PREPARATI ON, CELEBRATION, and CONTINUING EDUCATION
Scroll down for Presione aquí por \Ç à{x fÑ|Ü|à Éy XÇ xÄ XáÑ•Ü|àâ wx VtÇt VtÇö Guidelines for Pastoral Guías Pastorales Para el Outreach to Matrimonio Cristiano: Christian Marriage: Formación, Preparación, Formation, Preparation, Celebración y Educación Celebration, and Continuing Continua Education In the Spirit of Cana Guidelines for Pastoral Outreach to Christian Marriage: FORMATION, PREPARATI ON, CELEBRATION, AND CONTINUING EDUCATION www.marriageandfamilyministries.org | 312.534.8351 © 2005 Marriage and Family Ministries Office, Archdiocese of Chicago Revised 2015 The following people were instrumental in the development of this document. They served as the Revision Committee who created the general framework of the document. We thank them for their dedication to this project: Rafael and Olga Anglada Father Jim Heneghan Bishop Tom Paprocki Valentín Araya–Mesén Father Tom Hickey Elsie P. Radtke Tim and Connie Bultema Father Patrick Lagges Father George Rassas Father John Cusick Mike and Pam Lilly Alicia Rivera Maria Garcia Bishop Jerome Listecki Deacon Larry and Fran Spohr John Green Andrew Lyke Kevin and Crystal Sullivan Frank Hannigan Father Bill McNulty Joanna Stroncek Particular thanks go to Martha Burke Tressler for her work on “Marriage After the Death of a Spouse” and “Prayers of the Faithful,” Sister Joan McGuire, Rita George, and Father John Kartje for their help with the “Ecumenical Marriages” and “Interfaith Marriages” sections; Nora O’Callahan for her guidance on the “Previous Abortion” section; Richard C. Sparks, C.S.P., Ph.D., for his input in the “Special Circumstances” section that deals with health concerns; Christine Zambricki–Flaherty for her work on the “Cross–Cultural Issues” section; and Father Richard Saudis for his final review and valuable input to the document.