Waste Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOE/EIS-0217 Savannah River Site Waste Management Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II July 1995 Department of Energy ● Savannah River Operations OffIce . Aiken, South Carolina DOE/EIS4217 July 1995 VOLUME II TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDI~S A – Waste Forecasts B – Facility Descriptions C - Life-Cycle Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility Costs D - Innovative and Emerging Waste Management Treatment Technologies E - Supplemental Data F – Accident Analysis G - SRS Federal Facility Agreement Appendixes H – Alternative Approaches to Low-Level Waste Regulation I- Public Comments and DOE Responses J - Protected Species Survey Index Volume II iii DoE/Els-021 7 July 1995 APPENDIX A WASTE FORECASTS DOE/EIS-0217 July 1995 LIST OF TABLES w ~ A-1 Thirty-year waste forecast by waste type ........................................................................... A-1 A-2 Revisions to thi~-year mixed waste generation forecasts by waste classes . .. .. A-4 A-3 Thirty-year Iow-)evel waste forecast by waste classes ....................................................... A-7 A-4 Thirty-year hazardous waste forecast by waste classes ...................................................... A-9 A-5 Thirty-year mixed waste generation forecast by waste classes .......................................... A-1 1 A-6 Thirty-year transuranic and alpha waste forecast by waste classes .................................... A-13 A-ii DoEiEIs-02 17 July 1995 Table A.] provides a summary of the three 30-year waste forecasts (expected, minimum, and maximum) for SRS by waste and year. The table supports the discussion of the waste forecasts in Section 2,1, The table was compiled from the Thirty-Year Solid Waste Generation Forecast for Facilities at SRS (U) (WSRC 1994a), the Thir~-Year Solid Waste Generation Maximum and Minimum Forecast for SRS (WSRC 1994b). Changes in mixed waste volumes between the draft EIS and this document as a result of changes between the drafi and proposed site treatment plan are presented in Table A-2, and are reflected in the mixed waste totals j“ this table. The waste to be managed includes the forecasted generation identified in this appendix plus existing waste volumes in storage; existing waste in storage is included in Section 2.1, Waste Forecasts. To convert volumes to cubic feet, multiply by 35.31. Table A-1. Thitty-year waste forecast by waste type (volume in cubic meters). Liquid high- Low-1evel Hazardous Mixed Tmnsumrric Year level waste waste waste waste waste 1995 Exuected 2.598 17,916 2,418 2,501 65o M(nimum “705 17,906 1,398 1,622 650 Maximum 2,598 20,028 3>268 3,810 650 1996 Expected 4>317 17,821 1,478 2,539 1,201 Minimum 1,317 17,816 757 2,074 I,201 Maximum 4,358 19,136 1,965 4,296 I,754 1997 Expected 3,752 16,574 8,938 1,426 78o rc Minimum 1,158 16,448 4,0 )3 938 78o Maximum 4,358 24,395 }0,631 2,535 78o 1998 Expected 2,432 15,458 40,052 1,682 7s7 Minimum 1,240 13,206 32,471 971 487 Maximum 4,321 31,032 40,242 2,734 808 1999 Expected 1,788 15,081 33,375 2,479 720 Minimum 326 12,970 29,941 935 450 Maximum 2,611 30,481 34,272 3,512 733 2000 Expected 2,175 20,568 6,121 6,302 983 Minimum 387 12,258 3,400 3,751 135 Maximum 2, I74 39,98o 7,334 74,249 87,355a 2001 Expected 2,175 20,354 74,672 5,066 1,064 Minimum 387 11,553 59,577 2,186 60 Maximum 2,174 39,884 75,885 73,037 87,355 2002 Expected 857 20,039 8,007 5,111 1,064 Minimum 387 11,287 1,075 2,136 59 Maximum 850 39,726 9,220 73,087 87,355 2003 Expected 228 17,509 7,510 29,273 716 Minimum 387 11,254 1,390 2,351 59 Maximum 227 47,536 8,723 97,096 87,486 2004 Expected 126 16,856 16,416 9,379 412 Minimum 387 13,964 18,938 9,082 241 Maximum 227 51.057 28,550 81,567 87,63o A-1 DOEEIS-02 I7 July 1995 Table A-1. (continued). Liquid high- Low-1evel Hazardous Mixed Transuranic Year level waste waste waste waste waste 2005 ExDected 126 16,387 16,324 9,023 338 Minimum 387 12,379 18,050 5,587 114 Maximum 227 56,663 28,425 80,801 87,450 2006 Expected 126 15,319 16,367 9,177 213 Minimum 387 12,419 12,555 5,541 114 Maximum 227 56,193 27,981 16,897 1,139 2007 Expected 126 15,319 16,449 9>189 213 Minimum 387 12,742 12,634 5,8J7 118 Maximum 227 56,193 28,154 16,914 1,139 2008 Expected 126 15,319 16,393 9,232 213 Minimum 387 12,625 7,087 5,732 185 Maximum 227 56,193 28,017 16,965 1,139 2009 Expected 126 15,319 J6,410 9,245 213 Minimum 387 11,098 734 2,240 59 Maximum 227 56,193 24,742 16,982 1,139 2010 Expected 126 15,606 16,401 9,557 285 Minimum 387 11,098 751 2,279 59 Maximum 227 56,767 21,359 17,534 1,283 2011 Expected 126 14,996 J3,1J8 9,015 210 Minimum 387 11,018 720 2,180 58 Maximum 227 55>548 21,408 16,477 1,132 20J2 Expected 126 15,400 9,892 9,418 215 TC Minimum 387 11,425 752 2,561 131 Maximum 227 56,516 21,530 17,387 ),143 2013 Expected J26 15,319 9,943 9,358 214 Minimum 387 11,098 762 2,264 59 Maximum 227 56,193 21,557 17,118 1,139 2014 Expected 126 15,299 9,946 9,402 213 Minimum 387 11,320 784 2,50J 61 Maximum 227 51,052 21,641 17,164 42 I 2015 Expected J26 15,586 9,973 9,530 284 Minimum 387 11,078 747 2,141 58 Maximum 227 51,626 21,623 17,533 532 2016 Expected 126 15,299 9,998 9,307 213 Minimum 387 11,365 812 2,397 130 Maximum 227 50,262 21,118 15,106 388 2017 Expected 126 14,976 9,933 9,032 209 Minimum 387 10,995 741 2,058 57 Maximum 227 49,617 21,021 14,550 381 2018 Expected 126 13,719 9,0 I5 5,4J2 147 Minimum 387 11,076 764 2,151 58 Maximum 228 50,262 21,123 15,174 388 2019 Expected 13,799 9,029 5,497 148 Minimum 11,116 768 2,178 58 Maximum 50,584 21,161 15,478 392 A-2 DoEiEIs-02 I7 July 1995 Table A-1. (continued). Liquid high- Low-level Hazardous Mixed Transuranic Year level waste waste waste waste waste 2020 Expected 13,719 8,925 5,486 147 Minimum 11,282 791 2,361 129 Maximum 50,262 20,925 15,242 388 2021 Expected 14,005 9,139 5,733 219 Minimum 11,398 828 2,441 61 Maximum 50,835 21,363 15,761 532 2022 Expected 13,719 9,072 5,526 147 Minimum 11,076 771 2,176 58 Maximum 50,262 21,180 15,310 388 2023 Expected 13>396 9,054 5,255 143 Minimum 10,995 763 2,094 57 Maximum 49,617 21,129 14,754 381 2024 Expected I3,755 9,135 5,609 233 Minimum 10,959 738 2,085 48 Maximum 50,447 21,274 15,557 530 Totals Expected 22,212 474,432 433,503 224,761 12,564 Minimum 12,099 367,224 215,512 84,830 5,794 Maximum 27,077 I,404,540 676,821 804,627 543,330 a. The large volumes of transuranic waste are a result of digging up the burial ground. A-3 DoE/EIs-0217 July 1995 Table A-2 summarizes the revisions to the mixed waste forecasts that were incorporated in the final EIS. These changes were made to align the EIS waste forecasts with the 5-year projections for mixed waste generation included in the SRS Proposed Site Treutmenl Plan (WSRC 1995). Table A-2 presents the changes in volume for the various mixed waste classes that have been incorporated in the forecasts. Negative values represent reductions in the current waste forecast from that used in the draft EIS analyses. The net effect of these changes (including revised estimates of the amount of mixed waste currently stored at SRS) is an increase in the amount of mixed waste to be managed over the 30-year period of 8,795 cubic meters for the expected and minimum forecasts and 1,554 cubic meters for the maximum forecast (Hess 1995). Table A-2. Revisions to thirty-year mixed waste generation forecasts by waste classes (volume in cubic meters). ‘.’”’ti;eci&se5 Inorzanic.... Aaueous Oreanic Oreanic Composite Organic Year debris l~uids Ji~uids sludge“ Lead fd;ers LDR’ d~bris Mercuv 1995 Expected +5.4 +13 -3 +1.8 +3 -2.4 +213 +320.6 +0.1 Minimum +5.4 NC’ -3 +1.8 +3 -2.4 +213 +320.6 +0.1 Maximum NC NC -2.5 NC NC NC NC NC NC 19Y6 Expected +5.4 NC -116 +1.8 +1 -3.4 +227 +313 NC Minimum +5.4 NC .116 +1.8 +1 -3.4 +227 +313 NC Maximum NC NC -115 NC NC NC NC NC NC 1997 Expected +5.4 NC -25 +0.8 +1 -0.4 +227 +313 +0.3 Minimum +5.4 NC -25 +0.8 +1 -0.4 +227 +313 +0.3 T( Mwimum NC NC -24 NC NC NC NC NC NC 1998 Expected +5.4 NC -40 +0.8 +5 -0.4 +227 +314 +0.4 Minimum +5.4 NC -40 +0.8 +5 -0.4 +227 +314 +0.4 Minimum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 1999 Expected +5.4 NC -40 +0.8 +5 -0.4 +227 +314 +0.5 M]nimum +5.4 NC -40 +0.8 +5 -0.4 +227 +314 +0.5 Maximum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 2000 Expected +5.4 NC -40 +0.7 +4 -0.4 +30.3 +3 !4 +0.5 Minimum +5.4 NC -40 +0.7 +4 -0.4 +30.3 +314 +0.5 Maximum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 2001 Expected +5.4 NC -40 +0.7 +4 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.5 Minimum +5.4 NC .40 +0.7 +4 -0.4 +14 +314 +0,5 Maximum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 2002 Expected +5.4 NC -40 +0.7 +4 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Minimum +5,4 NC -40 +0.7 +4 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Maximum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 2003 Expected +5.4 NC +112 +0.9 +5 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Minimum +5.4 NC +112 +0.9 +5 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Minimum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 2004 Expected +5.4 NC -39 +0.9 +6 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Minimum +5.4 NC -39 +0.9 +6 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Maximum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 2005 Expected +5.4 NC +48 +0.9 +6 -0.4 +30.3 +314 +0.4 Minimum +5.4 NC +48 +0.9 +6 -0.4 +30.3 +3 I4 +0.4 Maximum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC 2006 Expected +5.4 NC -38 +1 +7 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Minimum +5.4 NC -38 +1 +7 -0.4 +14 +314 +0.4 Maximum NC NC -39 NC NC NC NC NC NC A-4 DoE/Els-021 7 July 1995 Table A-2.