DOCSLIB.ORG

Rev. 23 Table 4: Pacs by Chemical Name

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rev. 23 Table 4: Pacs by Chemical Name Table 4: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) Rev 23 based on applicable AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs (chemicals listed in alphabetical order) PAC Rev 23 – August 2007 Table 4 presents an alphabetical listing of the chemicals in the PAC data set and provides Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers (CAS RNs),1 PAC data, and technical information on the source of the PACs. Table 4 provides PACs for TEEL-0 (i.e., PAC-0), PAC-1, PAC-2, and PAC-3 in units of mass per unit volume (mg/m3) with the ppm to mg/m3 conversion (carried out at 25ºC and 760 mmHg) performed before rounding. The columns presented in Table 4 provide the following information: Heading Definition No. The ordered numbering of the chemicals as they appear in this alphabetical listing. Chemical The common name of the chemical compound. Compound CAS RN The Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number for this chemical. TEEL-0 This is the threshold concentration below which most people will experience no appreciable risk of health effects. This PAC is always based on TEEL-0 because AEGL-0 or ERPG-0 values do not exist. PAC-1 Based on the applicable AEGL-1, ERPG-1, or TEEL-1 value. PAC-2 Based on the applicable AEGL-2, ERPG-2, or TEEL-3 value. PAC-3 Based on the applicable AEGL-3, ERPG-3, or TEEL-3 value. Source of PACs Technical comments by the developers of the PAC data set that indicate the source of the data used to derive PAC values. The term “SAR,” often in red font, stands for “Structure Activity Relationships.” Other abbreviations are defined below or in the introductory material found at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/chem_safety/teel.html/. This column will be enhanced in the near future to improve the clarity and completeness of its information. • Chemicals for which AEGLs are available have their chemical name and CAS RN displayed in a bolded and larger font. • Chemicals for which ERPGs are available, but no AEGLs, have their chemical name and CAS RN displayed in a bolded font. • Chemicals for which TEELs are available, but no AEGLs or ERPGs, have their chemical name and CAS RN displayed using a regular font. The following information is pertinent to the derivation of hierarchy-based TEEL values: • Values are restricted by the hierarchy-based TEEL for the next higher category, so that: TEEL-0 ≤ TEEL-1 ≤ TEEL-2 ≤ TEEL-3. 1 Visit http://info.cas.org/ for information on the Chemical Abstracts Service and CAS RNs. Introduction to PAC Table 4 – PAC Rev 23 – 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 2 • The most recent available references (at the time of PAC/TEEL derivation) for Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs), Threshold Limit Values (TLVs), Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs), Workplace Environmental Exposure Levels (WEELs) and German limits (MAKs) are used. The most convenient source for these values is Guide to Occupational Exposure Values - 2007, compiled by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (see http://www.acgih.org/Store/ProductDetail.cfm?id=1911). • For particulate materials, limits used (in mg/m3) are for total dust, even though limits are sometimes also given for the respirable fraction. • “PNOS” = Particulates Not Otherwise Specified. This TLV-TWA value is for total dust, and the respirable fraction is assumed to be 30% of total concentration. • For substances that are in particulate form, all TEEL values have been reduced to a maximum value of 500 mg/m3. This concentration constitutes an upper bound for a stable cloud of respirable dust. The reason for this is that the coagulation rate of particles is a function of the square of the concentration number. Higher concentrations are unstable. • For a few chemicals whose ERPG-1 value was odor-based, rather than toxicity-based, the PAC-1 value was adjusted to the PEL-STEL, TLV-STEL, or 3 x TLV-TWA value. This is noted in the Comments Column of Table 2 when this substitution is made. • In the absence of other concentration limits or appropriate toxicity data for a chemical, a few values are based on British, Finnish, Russian, or other guidelines. • The usual order of use of toxicity data for TEEL-2 and/or TEEL-3 is subordinate to human toxicity data for a particular chemical. A few values depart from the usual guidelines, and are estimates based on existing concentration limits (at other TEEL values) and/or a comparison with similar chemicals and/or a review of available toxicity data. For example, the TEEL-3 value for 1-Bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin is estimated from the toxicity-based TEEL-3 for 3-Bromo-1-chloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin. • The PACs presented in these tables are toxicity-based and do not take flammability data into consideration in their development. In order to alert users as to the potential for explosion and flammability hazards, Table 2 uses special formatting to indicate the relationship of these values to the lower explosive limit (LEL) of a chemical substance. Additional information on the chemicals presented in Table 4 is provided in PAC Tables 1, 2, and 3. Definitions of AEGL, ERPG, and TEELs values (-0,-1,-2, and -3) are provided at the beginning of PAC Tables 2 and 3. Table 4, other PAC Tables, introductory/explanatory material (including a glossary of acronyms and abbreviations), definitions of PAC values, and alternative methods of displaying PAC information are available electronically at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/chem_safety/teel.html. Additional technical information on PACs and TEELs, contact information, and links to other sources of information is accessible on the Subcommittee for Consequence Assessment and Protective Action (SCAPA) webpages at: http://orise.orau.gov/emi/scapa/teels.htm. Chemicals without an identified CAS RN number are issued an identification number, preceded by the letter “z,” for purposes of the PAC data set. The same “z” number that was used in “TEELs Rev 21” has been retained, where applicable. Introduction to PAC Table 4 – PAC Rev 23 – 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2 08/30/2007 Table 4: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) Rev 23 (mg/m3) based on PACs Rev 23 applicable AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs (chemicals listed in alphabetical order) PACs based on AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs 3 No. Chemical Name CAS RN (mg/m ) Source of PACs TEEL-0 PAC-1 PAC-2 PAC-3 1 Acacia; (Gum Arabic) 9000-01-5 200 500 500 500 Rat oral LD50, rat oral TDlo 2 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.4 1.25 7.5 250 Rat ip LD50, rat TClo 3 Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.06 0.2 1.25 500 Rat ip LD50, rat TClo AEGL-1, AEGL-1, AEGL-2, 4 Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 40 81 486 1,510 AEGL-3 5 Acetamide 60-35-5 25 75 500 500 Rat oral LD50, rabbit oral TDlo 6 Acetanilide 103-84-4 0.4 1 7.5 50 Human oral TD lo, human oral LDlo 7 Acetic acid 64-19-7 12 12 86 610 ERPG-1, ERPG-1, ERPG-2, ERPG-3 Acetic acid ethenyl ester, polymer with 1,1- 8 27360-07-2 10 30 50 250 Used PNOS default. bis(ethenyloxy) butane and ethenol 9 Acetic acid, 2-propenyl ester 591-87-7 2 6 40 200 Rat LC50 10 Acetic acid, lithium salt 546-89-4 12.5 35 250 500 Mouse oral LDlo. 11 Acetic acid, manganese(2+) salt, tetrahydrate 6156-78-1 0.892 2.68 22.3 500 Mn concentration limits. AEGLs = bold 12pt font / ERPGs (but not AEGLs) = bold 10pt font The “Source of PACs” column will be enhanced in the near future to improve the clarity and completeness of its information. 1 08/30/2007 Table 4: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) Rev 23 (mg/m3) based on PACs Rev 23 applicable AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs (chemicals listed in alphabetical order) PACs based on AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs 3 No. Chemical Name CAS RN (mg/m ) Source of PACs TEEL-0 PAC-1 PAC-2 PAC-3 12 Acetic acid, manganese(II) salt (2:1) 638-38-0 0.63 9.45 15.7 500 Mn compound concentration limits. 13 Acetic Anhydride 108-24-7 20 20 20 750 PEL-TWA, REL-C, IDLH. AEGL-1, AEGL-1, AEGL-2, 14 Acetone 67-64-1 475 475 7,600 13,500 AEGL-3 15 Acetone thiosemicarbazide 1752-30-3 20 60 100 100 LOC, LC50 16 Acetone-d6 666-52-4 524 524 8,390 14,900 Acetone (67-64-1) limits used. AEGL-1, AEGL-1, AEGL-2, 17 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 21.8 21.8 537 1,120 AEGL-3 18 Acetonitrile-d3 2206-26-0 75 100 100 750 Used Acetonitrile TEELs. 19 Acetophenone 98-86-2 10 30 50 350 Concentration limits, rat oral LD50 20 Acetoxytriphenylstannane 900-95-8 0.345 0.689 20 50 Concentration limits, rat oral LD50 21 Acetyl bromide 506-96-7 1 3 20 100 Mouse ip LD50 Acetyl carbinol; (Acetol (1); 1-Hydroxy-2- 22 116-09-6 7.5 25 200 500 Rat oral LD50. propanone) AEGLs = bold 12pt font / ERPGs (but not AEGLs) = bold 10pt font The “Source of PACs” column will be enhanced in the near future to improve the clarity and completeness of its information. 2 08/30/2007 Table 4: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) Rev 23 (mg/m3) based on PACs Rev 23 applicable AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs (chemicals listed in alphabetical order) PACs based on AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs 3 No. Chemical Name CAS RN (mg/m ) Source of PACs TEEL-0 PAC-1 PAC-2 PAC-3 23 Acetyl chloride 75-36-5 0.0075 0.02 0.15 400 Human TClo, rat oral LD50 24 Acetyl triethyl citrate 77-89-4 6 20 125 500 Mouse ip TD lo, rat oral LD50.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regulated Substance List
    INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE UNIFIED PROGRAM (UP) FORM REGULATED SUBSTANCE LIST CHEMICAL NAME CAS # TQ Listing CHEMICAL NAME CAS # TQ Listing (Lbs) Basis (Lbs) Basis Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 10,000 g Cantharidin 56-25-7 100/10,0001 * Acetone Cyanohydrin 75-86-5 1,000 Carbachol Chloride 51-83-2 500/10,0001 Acetone Thiosemicarbazide 1752-30-3 1,000/10,0001 Acetylene (Ethyne) 74-86-2 10,000 f Carbamic Acid, Methyl-,o- Acrolein (2-Propenal) 107-02-8 500 b (((2,4-Dimethyl-1,3-Dithiolan- Acrylamide 79-06-1 1,000/10,0001 2-YL) Methylene)Amino)- 26419-73-8 100/10,0001 Acrylonitrile (2- Propenenitrile) 107-13-1 10,000 b Carbofuran 1563-66-2 10/10,0001 Acrylyl Chloride Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 10,000 b (2-Propenoyl Chloride) 814-68-6 100 b Carbon Oxysulfide Aldicarb 116-06-3 100/10,0001 (Carbon Oxide Sulfide (COS)) 463-58-1 10,000 f Aldrin 309-00-2 500/10,0001 Chlorine 7782-50-5 100 a,b Allyl Alcohol (2-Propen-1-ol) 107-18-6 1,000 b Chlorine Dioxide Allylamine (2-Propen-1-Amine) 107-11-9 500 b (Chlorine Oxide (ClO2)) 10049-04-4 1,000 c Aluminum Phosphide 20859-73-8 500 Chlorine Monoxide (Chlorine Oxide) 7791-21-1 10,000 f Aminopterin 54-62-6 500/10,0001 Chlormequat Chloride 999-81-5 100/10,0001 Amiton Oxalate 3734-97-2 100/10,0001 Chloroacetic Acid 79-11-8 100/10,0001 Ammonia, Anhydrous 2 7664-41-7 500 a,b Chloroform 67-66-3 10,000 b Ammonia, Aqueous Chloromethyl Ether (conc 20% or greater) 7664-41-7 20,000 a,b (Methane,Oxybis(chloro-) 542-88-1 100 b * Aniline 62-53-3 1,000 Chloromethyl Methyl Ether Antimycin A 1397-94-0 1,000/10,0001 (Chloromethoxymethane)
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Export Controls
    Foreign Affairs, Trade and Affaires étrangères, Commerce et Development Canada Développment Canada A Guide To CANADA’S EXPORT CONTROLS December 2012 Introduction The issuance of export permits is administered by the Export Controls Division (TIE) of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD). TIE provides assistance to exporters in determining if export permits are required. It also publishes brochures and Notices to Exporters that are freely available on request and on our website www.exportcontrols.gc.ca. How to contact us: Export Controls Division (TIE) Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada 111 Sussex Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G2 Telephone: (613) 996-2387 Facsimile: (613) 996-9933 Email: [email protected] For information on how to apply for an export permit and additional information on export controls please refer to our website. To enquire on the status of an export permit application: Recognized EXCOL users can check the status of an export permit application on-line. Non-recognized users can call (613) 996-2387 or email [email protected] and quote your export permit application identification (ref ID) number. Export Controls Division website: www.exportcontrols.gc.ca This Guide, at time of publication, encompasses the list of items enumerated on the Export Control List (ECL) that are controlled for export in accordance with Canadian foreign policy, including Canada’s participation in multilateral export control regimes and bilateral agreements. Unless otherwise specified, the export controls contained in this Guide apply to all destinations except the United States. Canada’s Export Control List can be found at the Department of Justice website at http://canada.justice.gc.ca/.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 10 October 2018 Amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009
    14.12.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 319/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2018/1922 of 10 October 2018 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items ( 1), and in particular Article 15(3) thereof, Whereas: (1) Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 requires dual-use items to be subject to effective control when they are exported from or transit through the Union, or are delivered to a third country as a result of brokering services provided by a broker resident or established in the Union. (2) Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 establishes the common list of dual-use items that are subject to controls in the Union. Decisions on the items subject to controls are taken within the framework of the Australia Group ( 2 ), the Missile Technology Control Regime ( 3 ), the Nuclear Suppliers Group ( 4 ), the Wassenaar Arrangement ( 5 ) and the Chemical Weapons Convention. (3) The list of dual-use items set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 needs to be updated regularly so as to ensure full compliance with international security obligations, to guarantee transparency, and to maintain the competitiveness of economic operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/DL Praevention/Fachwissen/Gefahrstoffe/TOXIKOLOGI SCHE BEWERTUNGEN/Bewertungen/Toxbew072-L.Pdf
    Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis or dissertation as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known, including display on the world wide web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis or dissertation. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. Signature: _____________________________ ______________ Jedidiah Samuel Snyder Date Statistical analysis of concentration-time extrapolation factors for acute inhalation exposures to hazardous substances By Jedidiah S. Snyder Master of Public Health Global Environmental Health _________________________________________ P. Barry Ryan, Ph.D. Committee Chair _________________________________________ Eugene Demchuk, Ph.D. Committee Member _________________________________________ Paige Tolbert, Ph.D. Committee Member Statistical analysis of concentration-time extrapolation factors for acute inhalation exposures to hazardous substances By Jedidiah S. Snyder Bachelor of Science in Engineering, B.S.E. The University of Iowa 2010 Thesis Committee Chair: P. Barry Ryan, Ph.D. An abstract of A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Public Health in Global Environmental Health 2015 Abstract Statistical analysis of concentration-time extrapolation factors for acute inhalation exposures to hazardous substances By Jedidiah S.
    [Show full text]
  • Calarp) Program
    California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program Administering Agency Guidance January 31, 2005 Preface This document provides general guidance to help Administering Agencies (AAs) implement and enforce the California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program. The intent is to identify the elements of the Program applicable to each regulated business, and assist AAs with oversight of the CalARP Program statutes and regulations. This document is not a substitute for the CalARP Program regulations; it does not impose legally binding requirements. About This Document This document follows the format of the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 2, Chapter 4.5: California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program. The regulatory sections are presented in parentheses for ease of reference. Acknowledgements The California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) would like to thank the following people for their valuable assistance in the preparation of this document: Howard Wines, Hazardous Materials Specialist, City of Bakersfield Fire Department Robert Distaso P.E., Fire Safety Engineer, Orange County Fire Authority Randall L. Sawyer, Supervisor, Accidental Release Prevention Programs, Contra Costa County Health Services Department Beronia Beniamine, Senior Hazardous Materials Specialist, Stanislaus County Environmental Resources Department Angie Proboszcz, Risk Management Program Coordinator, USEPA Region 9 Jon Christenson, Senior Environmental Health Specialist, Merced County Department of Public Health Teresa
    [Show full text]
  • Addition of a Grignard Reagent to an Ester: Formation of a Tertiary Alcohol
    Addition of a Grignard Reagent to an Ester: Formation of a Tertiary Alcohol Introduction: Grignard reagents are important and versatile reagents in organic chemistry. In this experiment, you will prepare a Grignard reagent and react it with an ester to prepare a tertiary alcohol. Specifically, in this reaction you will prepare phenyl magnesium bromide from bromobenzene and magnesium metal and then react it with methyl benzoate to prepare triphenylmethanol (Figure 1). In this reaction, two equivalents of phenylmagnesium bromide add to methyl benzoate. Note: Grignard reagents are sensitive to water. ALL glassware must be completely clean and dry. Reagents have been stored over molecular sieves to keep them dry in storage, but you should also keep containers closed as much as possible. Finally, water in the air can also react with the Grignard reagents over time. To successfully prepare triphenylmethanol in this experiment, you will need to be well organized and not take too much time between steps. Figure 1. O 1) Me O OH Br Mg MgBr THF + 2) H3O triphenylmethanol Mechanism: The formation of Grignard reagents from aryl halides is a complex mechanism, which takes place on the surface of the magnesium metal. You do not need to concern yourself with the details of this step of the mechanism. Figure 2. MgBr O Bu MgBr Bu MgBr O + OH O Bu MgBr O H3O Me OEt Bu Me OEt Me Bu Me Bu Me –EtOMgBr Bu Bu The mechanism of the reaction of a Grignard reagent with an ester is shown in Figure 2 (using methyl propionate and butylmagnesium bromide).
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Citrate As Processing Aid (Anticoagulant) for Spray Dried Blood Products
    From: Protena Nicaragua Proteína Naturales, S.A. Km 27, Panamericana Norte Nicaragua To: Program Manager, USDA/AMS/TM/NOP, Room 4008-So., Ag Stop 0268, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250 Phone: (202) 720–3252 Fax: (202) 205–7808. [email protected] (electronic submission) Subject: Petition: Sodium Citrate as Processing Aid (Anticoagulant) for Spray Dried Blood Products In this petition, we address each of the Items listed in the new NOP 3011: National List Petition Guidelines (effective March 11, 2016) Most all of the information contained in this petition has already been made available to USDA-NOP in the Technical Evaluation Report for Citric acid and Salts (Handling/Processing), compiled by OMRI for the USDA National Organic Program, Feb 17, 2015 (See attachment # 1 – Sodium Citrate TR2015) https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Citric%20Acid%20TR%202015.pdf. Direct quotes from this report are “italics”. Since citric acid is a necessary precursor for sodium citrate, citric acid is also an essential part of this evaluation. Sodium citrate is produced when citric acid is mixed with sodium hydroxide or sodium bicarbonate. Item A.1 — This is a petition to include Sodium Citrate in the List of Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production (§ 205.601). If approved, sodium citrate would be allowed as synthetic organic ingredient (anticoagulant) for processing bovine blood after collection at slaughter, so the blood will maintain a liquid state while being processed into organic crop fertilizer (spray dried blood meal and spray dried hemoglobin). Item A.2 — The OFPA Category (7 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Microencapsula Tion of Rodenticides
    STUDIES IN MICROENCAPSULA TION OF RODENTICIDES P. B. CORNWEL,.L, Director of Research, Rentokil Laboratories ltd., Felcourt, E. Grinstead, Sussex, England ABSTRACT: Warfarln, zinc phosphide, norbormlde and alphachloralose have been mlcroencapsu­ lated by the technique of coacervatlon and fed to laboratory rats (R. norveglcus) and mice (H. mU$CUlus). Results are given of experiments In which the concentration of rodentlclde, wall material and phase ratio have been varied separately and in combination. Experiments are also repot'ted In which normal and encapsulated rodentlclde have been fed together In the same test diet. Hlcroencapsulatlon can Increase the Intake of rodentlcldes, appreciably, whether or not alternative food is simultaneously available. Nevertheless, significantly higher kills from higher Intakes of poison have not been achieved, Indicating difficulties In optimising the characteristics of the capsule wall to achieve the desired release of Ingested active In­ gredient. INTl\ODUCTION Hlcroencapsulatlon can be defined as a chemical process by which minute amounts of solids or liquids are enclosed within a thin wall of suitable material to prevent their reaction with some component of the environment. The properties of the wall are so designed to keep the reactive materials apart until they are required to mix. Hlcroencapsulatlon, as an Industrial process, has been developed for many applications by the Natlon~l Cash Register Co. These Include carbonless copying paper, drugs with design­ ed release characteristics, as well as uses In the perfumery, adhesive and food Industries (Gordon, 1965) . The costs vary from 40 U.S. cents to $4 per kg. of encapsulated material (Watson, 1970) and many future applications have been proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Copper(I) Complexes of P‐Stereogenic Josiphos and Related Ligands
    Full Papers doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202100146 Copper(I) Complexes of P-Stereogenic Josiphos and Related Ligands Ross A. Arthurs,[a] Alice C. Dean,[a] David L. Hughes,[a] and Christopher J. Richards*[a] Starting from (R)-Ugi’s amine, diastereoselective lithiation avoiding the isolation of air-sensitive phosphine intermediates. followed by Ar’PCl2 and then Ar’’MgBr led to the generation, as This protection methodology was also applied to the synthesis single diastereoisomers, of (R,Sp,Sphos) [Ar’=Ph, Ar’’=o-Tol] and of Josiphos/CuCl complexes derived from PCl3. In addition, (R,Sp,Rphos) [Ar’=o-Tol, Ar’’= Ph] PPFA ligand derivatives. Amine related bulky cobalt-sandwich complex-based derivatives were substitution of both with HPCy2 gave P-stereogenic Josiphos also obtained. Preliminary investigation revealed isolated CuCl ligands, and then addition of CuCl, the corresponding copper(I) complexes as competent catalyst precursors for enantioselec- complexes. The latter were also generated by using borane P tive conjugate addition reactions. and N protecting groups and in situ Cu(I) complexation, Introduction Although many ligands have been developed for application in asymmetric synthesis, relatively few have found widespread use. Of these so-called ‘privileged’ ligands,[1] one of the most successful class are the ferrocene-based Josiphos ligands A.[2] Numerous derivatives are known, obtained by varying the identity of R’ and R’’, and many are commercially available. This has aided the incorporation of A into many ligand screening exercises, often leading to a successful outcome.[3] In particular, in situ generated Josiphos-copper complexes have been applied Scheme 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetics and Mechanism of Polythionate Oxidation to Sulfate at Low Ph by O2 and Fe3+
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 67, No. 23, pp. 4457–4469, 2003 Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/03 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00388-0 3؉ Kinetics and mechanism of polythionate oxidation to sulfate at low pH by O2 and Fe 1, 2 1,2 GREGORY K. DRUSCHEL, *ROBERT J. HAMERS, and JILLIAN F. BANFIELD † 1Departments of Geology and Geophysics and 2Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 USA (Received October 16, 2002; accepted in revised form May 30, 2003) 2Ϫ Abstract—Polythionates (SxO6 ) are important in redox transformations involving many sulfur compounds. Here we investigate the oxidation kinetics and mechanisms of trithionate and tetrathionate oxidation between pH 0.4 and pH 2 in the presence of Fe3ϩ and/or oxygen. In these solutions, Fe3ϩ plus oxygen oxidizes tetrathionate and trithionate at least an order of magnitude faster than oxygen alone. Kinetic measurements, coupled with density functional calculations, suggest that the rate-limiting step for tetrathionate oxidation involves Fe3ϩ attachment, followed by electron density shifts that result in formation of a sulfite radical and 0 S3O3 derivatives. The overall reaction orders for trithionate and tetrathionate are fractional due to rearrange- ment reactions and side reactions between reactants and intermediate products. The pseudo-first order rate coefficients for tetrathionate range from 10Ϫ11 sϪ1 at 25°C to 10Ϫ8 sϪ1 at 70°C, compared to 2 ϫ 10Ϫ7 sϪ1 Ϯ at 35 °C for trithionate. The apparent activation energy (EA) for tetrathionate oxidation at pH 1.5 is 104.5 4.13 kJ/mol.
    [Show full text]
  • Argonne Report.Pdf
    CONTENTS NOTATION ........................................................................................................................... xi ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Overview of the Emergency Response Guidebook ................................................ 5 1.2 Organization of this Report ..................................................................................... 7 2 GENERAL METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 9 2.1 TIH List ................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Background ................................................................................................. 10 2.1.2 Changes in the TIH List for the ERG2012 ................................................. 11 2.2 Shipment and Release Scenarios ............................................................................ 11 2.2.1 Shipment Profiles ........................................................................................ 12 2.2.2 Treatment of Chemical Agents ................................................................... 14 2.3 Generics, Mixtures, and Solutions .......................................................................... 17 2.4 Analysis of Water-Reactive
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances)
    APPENDIX A (THE LIST OF EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES) THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 75-86-5 ACETONE CYANOHYDRIN 500 10 1752-30-3 ACETONE THIOSEMICARBAZIDE 500/500 1,000 107-02-8 ACROLEIN 500 1 79-06-1 ACRYLAMIDE 500/500 5,000 107-13-1 ACRYLONITRILE 500 100 814-68-6 ACRYLYL CHLORIDE 100 100 111-69-3 ADIPONITRILE 500 1,000 116-06-3 ALDICARB 100/500 1 309-00-2 ALDRIN 500/500 1 107-18-6 ALLYL ALCOHOL 500 100 107-11-9 ALLYLAMINE 500 500 20859-73-8 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE 500 100 54-62-6 AMINOPTERIN 500/500 500 78-53-5 AMITON 500 500 3734-97-2 AMITON OXALATE 100/500 100 7664-41-7 AMMONIA 500 100 300-62-9 AMPHETAMINE 500 1,000 62-53-3 ANILINE 500 5,000 88-05-1 ANILINE,2,4,6-TRIMETHYL- 500 500 7783-70-2 ANTIMONY PENTAFLUORIDE 500 500 1397-94-0 ANTIMYCIN A 500/500 1,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 1303-28-2 ARSENIC PENTOXIDE 100/500 1 THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 1327-53-3 ARSENOUS OXIDE 100/500 1 7784-34-1 ARSENOUS TRICHLORIDE 500 1 7784-42-1 ARSINE 100 100 2642-71-9 AZINPHOS-ETHYL 100/500 100 86-50-0 AZINPHOS-METHYL 10/500 1 98-87-3 BENZAL CHLORIDE 500 5,000 98-16-8 BENZENAMINE, 3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)- 500 500 100-14-1 BENZENE, 1-(CHLOROMETHYL)-4-NITRO- 500/500 500 98-05-5 BENZENEARSONIC ACID 10/500 10 3615-21-2 BENZIMIDAZOLE, 4,5-DICHLORO-2-(TRI- 500/500 500 FLUOROMETHYL)- 98-07-7 BENZOTRICHLORIDE 100 10 100-44-7 BENZYL CHLORIDE 500 100 140-29-4 BENZYL CYANIDE 500 500 15271-41-7 BICYCLO[2.2.1]HEPTANE-2-CARBONITRILE,5-
    [Show full text]