DOCSLIB.ORG

Calarp) Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calarp) Program California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program Administering Agency Guidance January 31, 2005 Preface This document provides general guidance to help Administering Agencies (AAs) implement and enforce the California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program. The intent is to identify the elements of the Program applicable to each regulated business, and assist AAs with oversight of the CalARP Program statutes and regulations. This document is not a substitute for the CalARP Program regulations; it does not impose legally binding requirements. About This Document This document follows the format of the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 2, Chapter 4.5: California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program. The regulatory sections are presented in parentheses for ease of reference. Acknowledgements The California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) would like to thank the following people for their valuable assistance in the preparation of this document: Howard Wines, Hazardous Materials Specialist, City of Bakersfield Fire Department Robert Distaso P.E., Fire Safety Engineer, Orange County Fire Authority Randall L. Sawyer, Supervisor, Accidental Release Prevention Programs, Contra Costa County Health Services Department Beronia Beniamine, Senior Hazardous Materials Specialist, Stanislaus County Environmental Resources Department Angie Proboszcz, Risk Management Program Coordinator, USEPA Region 9 Jon Christenson, Senior Environmental Health Specialist, Merced County Department of Public Health Teresa Quiaoit, Hazardous Material Specialist III, Los Angeles County Fire Department Cal EMA staff: Jack Harrah, Hazardous Substances Scientist Cara Roderick, Hazardous Substances Scientist Charles Snyder, Hazardous Substances Scientist Brian Abeel, Hazardous Substances Scientist Steven DeMello, Program Manager II, Technological Hazards Division Deni Gray, Associate Governmental Program Analyst Dr. Frederick Lercari, Associate Toxicologist Fred Mehr, Hazardous Substances Scientist Michael Warren, Senior Emergency Services Coordinator Norm Wobschall, Graphic Designer David Zocchetti, Staff Counsel California Emergency Management Agency 01/31/05 Page 2 of 174 CalARP Program Administering Agency Guidance About the January 31, 2005 Revision The current version of this document is intended to reflect the June 28, 2004 revision to the CalARP regulations, California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 2, Chapter 4.5. In addition to correcting numerous minor errors in spelling, grammar and math (and hopefully not introducing too many more), the following list outlines the changes that have been made to the August 28, 2003 CalARP Administering Agency Guidance. Pages 23-24, Section 2740.1(d) – Registration. Several new fields added. Page 30, Section 2745.3 – Executive summary. No longer includes release scenarios. Page 33, Section 2745.10(c) and (d) – RMP Updates. “De-registration” added. Page 33, Section 2745.10.5 – Required RMP Corrections. New section. Page 39-40, Section 2750.3 – Quick Reference Worst Case Release Scenario Requirements. Updated flammable fuel requirements. Page 75, Section 2770.2 – Threshold determination. Elaboration on threshold determination for chemicals with listed concentrations. Page 108, Appendix D – CalARP Program Table of Deadlines. “De-registration” added. Pages 118-154, Appendix G – Example Forms and Letters. Several new forms added, including a new version of the registration form, with the new 2004 fields. Page 155, Appendix H – Acronym list. “SIC” deleted, “NAICS” added. Page 158, old Appendix J – List of Federal Registers. This appendix was deleted. Page 158, Former Appendix K now designated Appendix J. Pages 158-170, new Appendix J – CalARP Program Evaluation Questions. Questions updated to reflect 2004 regulations. California Emergency Management Agency 01/31/05 Page 3 of 174 CalARP Program Administering Agency Guidance TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 General (Article 1) ..................................................................................................13 Selected Definitions (Section 2735.3) .....................................................................................13 Applicability (Section 2735.4) ................................................................................................14 General Requirements (Section 2735.5) .................................................................................15 CalARP Program Management System (Section 2735.6) .......................................................17 Emergency Information Access (Section 2735.7) ...................................................................18 Chapter 2 Registration (Article 2) ...........................................................................................23 Registration (Section 2740.1) ..................................................................................................23 Chapter 3 Risk Management Plan (RMP) Components and Submission Requirements (Article 3) ........................................................................................25 Submission (Section 2745.1) ...................................................................................................25 RMP Review Process (Section 2745.2) ..................................................................................27 RMP Executive Summary Component (Section 2745.3) ........................................................30 RMP Offsite Consequence Analysis and Five-year Accident History Components (Sections 2745.4 and 2745.5)......................................................................................31 RMP Program 2 Prevention Program Component (Section 2745.6) .......................................31 RMP Program 3 Prevention Program Component (Section 2745.7) ......................................31 RMP Emergency Response Program Component (Section 2745.8) .......................................32 RMP Certification (Section 2745.9) ........................................................................................32 RMP Updates (Section 2745.10) .............................................................................................32 Required RMP Corrections (Section 2745.10.5) .....................................................................33 Covered Process Modification (Section 2745.11) ...................................................................34 Certificate of Occupancy (Section 2745.12) ............................................................................34 Chapter 4. Hazard Assessment (Article 4) ...............................................................................35 Hazard Assessment Applicability (Section 2750.1) ................................................................35 Offsite Consequence Analysis Parameters (Section 2750.2) ...................................................36 Worst-Case Release Scenario Analysis (Section 2750.3) ........................................................37 Alternative Release Scenario Analysis (Section 2750.4) ........................................................40 Defining Offsite Impacts to the Population (Section 2750.5)..................................................40 Defining Offsite Impacts to the Environment (Section 2750.6) ..............................................41 Offsite Consequence Analysis Review and Update (Section 2750.7) .....................................41 Offsite Consequence Analysis Documentation (Section 2750.8) ...........................................41 Five-year Accident History (Section 2750.9) .........................................................................42 California Emergency Management Agency 01/31/05 Page 4 of 174 CalARP Program Administering Agency Guidance Chapter 5. Program 2 Prevention Program (Article 5) ..........................................................43 Safety Information (Section 2755.1) ........................................................................................43 Hazard Review (Section 2755.2) .............................................................................................43 Operating Procedures (Section 2755.3) ...................................................................................44 Training (Section 2755.4) ........................................................................................................45 Maintenance (Section 2755.5) .................................................................................................46 Compliance Audits (Section 2755.6) .......................................................................................47 Incident Investigation (Section 2755.7) ...................................................................................48 Chapter 6. Program 3 Prevention Program (Article 6) ..........................................................49 Process Safety Information (Section 2760.1) ..........................................................................49 Process Hazard Analysis [PHA] (Section 2760.2) .................................................................51 Operating Procedures (Section 2760.3) ...................................................................................54 Training (Section 2760.4) ........................................................................................................55 Mechanical Integrity (Section 2760.5) ....................................................................................58 Management of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regulated Substance List
    INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE UNIFIED PROGRAM (UP) FORM REGULATED SUBSTANCE LIST CHEMICAL NAME CAS # TQ Listing CHEMICAL NAME CAS # TQ Listing (Lbs) Basis (Lbs) Basis Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 10,000 g Cantharidin 56-25-7 100/10,0001 * Acetone Cyanohydrin 75-86-5 1,000 Carbachol Chloride 51-83-2 500/10,0001 Acetone Thiosemicarbazide 1752-30-3 1,000/10,0001 Acetylene (Ethyne) 74-86-2 10,000 f Carbamic Acid, Methyl-,o- Acrolein (2-Propenal) 107-02-8 500 b (((2,4-Dimethyl-1,3-Dithiolan- Acrylamide 79-06-1 1,000/10,0001 2-YL) Methylene)Amino)- 26419-73-8 100/10,0001 Acrylonitrile (2- Propenenitrile) 107-13-1 10,000 b Carbofuran 1563-66-2 10/10,0001 Acrylyl Chloride Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 10,000 b (2-Propenoyl Chloride) 814-68-6 100 b Carbon Oxysulfide Aldicarb 116-06-3 100/10,0001 (Carbon Oxide Sulfide (COS)) 463-58-1 10,000 f Aldrin 309-00-2 500/10,0001 Chlorine 7782-50-5 100 a,b Allyl Alcohol (2-Propen-1-ol) 107-18-6 1,000 b Chlorine Dioxide Allylamine (2-Propen-1-Amine) 107-11-9 500 b (Chlorine Oxide (ClO2)) 10049-04-4 1,000 c Aluminum Phosphide 20859-73-8 500 Chlorine Monoxide (Chlorine Oxide) 7791-21-1 10,000 f Aminopterin 54-62-6 500/10,0001 Chlormequat Chloride 999-81-5 100/10,0001 Amiton Oxalate 3734-97-2 100/10,0001 Chloroacetic Acid 79-11-8 100/10,0001 Ammonia, Anhydrous 2 7664-41-7 500 a,b Chloroform 67-66-3 10,000 b Ammonia, Aqueous Chloromethyl Ether (conc 20% or greater) 7664-41-7 20,000 a,b (Methane,Oxybis(chloro-) 542-88-1 100 b * Aniline 62-53-3 1,000 Chloromethyl Methyl Ether Antimycin A 1397-94-0 1,000/10,0001 (Chloromethoxymethane)
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrophotometric Determination of Thiocyanate In
    Investigative Forensic Sciences © All rights are reserved by Buddha D. Paul and Thomas Research Article Open Access Spectrophotometric Determination of Thiocyanate in Human Saliva by a Unique Iodine-Azide-Chromogenic Substrate Reaction and its Application in Distinguishing Tobacco Smokers from Non-Smokers† Buddha D. Paul and Thomas Bosy Division of Forensic Toxicology, Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner, Dover AFB, Delaware, USA. Abstract A method to detect thiocyanate (SCN) in human saliva is presented. Thiocyanate concentrations appear to be diagnostic when classifying smokers or non-smokers, and in determining some clinical conditions. The method involves the reaction of SCN with excess iodine and azide, and spectroscopic detection of unreacted iodine by a chromogenic substrate, ABTS. The calibration was linear over the range of 12.5-150 µmol/L (slope = 0.0086 delta-Abs/SCN µmol/L, intercept = -0.0160 delta-Abs, R2 0.9998). The method was applied to analyze 29 saliva specimens. The results were similar to those obtained from a gas chromatography-mass 2 spectrometry method (slope = 0.9595, R 0.9790). Based on Grubbs equation applied to specimens from non-smoking subjects, a threshold concentration of 1100 µmol/L for SCN was determined to distinguish smokers from the non-smokers. The SCN concentrations in 18 out of 20 saliva specimens collected from 2 smokers were above this threshold. The specimens from smokers were also examined for nicotine and cotinine by a GCMS method. While nicotine concentrations were found to vary, the cotinine concentrations remained stable, 134+29 ng/mL. Generally, the presence of nicotine/cotinine in specimens only indicates exposure to tobacco products, but the presence of any of these compounds with elevated SCN, is an indication of smoking.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Microencapsula Tion of Rodenticides
    STUDIES IN MICROENCAPSULA TION OF RODENTICIDES P. B. CORNWEL,.L, Director of Research, Rentokil Laboratories ltd., Felcourt, E. Grinstead, Sussex, England ABSTRACT: Warfarln, zinc phosphide, norbormlde and alphachloralose have been mlcroencapsu­ lated by the technique of coacervatlon and fed to laboratory rats (R. norveglcus) and mice (H. mU$CUlus). Results are given of experiments In which the concentration of rodentlclde, wall material and phase ratio have been varied separately and in combination. Experiments are also repot'ted In which normal and encapsulated rodentlclde have been fed together In the same test diet. Hlcroencapsulatlon can Increase the Intake of rodentlcldes, appreciably, whether or not alternative food is simultaneously available. Nevertheless, significantly higher kills from higher Intakes of poison have not been achieved, Indicating difficulties In optimising the characteristics of the capsule wall to achieve the desired release of Ingested active In­ gredient. INTl\ODUCTION Hlcroencapsulatlon can be defined as a chemical process by which minute amounts of solids or liquids are enclosed within a thin wall of suitable material to prevent their reaction with some component of the environment. The properties of the wall are so designed to keep the reactive materials apart until they are required to mix. Hlcroencapsulatlon, as an Industrial process, has been developed for many applications by the Natlon~l Cash Register Co. These Include carbonless copying paper, drugs with design­ ed release characteristics, as well as uses In the perfumery, adhesive and food Industries (Gordon, 1965) . The costs vary from 40 U.S. cents to $4 per kg. of encapsulated material (Watson, 1970) and many future applications have been proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Microencapsulation of Rodenticides
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Proceedings of the 4th Vertebrate Pest Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings Conference (1970) collection March 1970 STUDIES IN MICROENCAPSULATION OF RODENTICIDES P. B. Cornwell Rentokil Laboratories Ltd., Sussex, England Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpcfour Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Cornwell, P. B., "STUDIES IN MICROENCAPSULATION OF RODENTICIDES" (1970). Proceedings of the 4th Vertebrate Pest Conference (1970). 18. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpcfour/18 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings collection at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the 4th Vertebrate Pest Conference (1970) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. STUDIES IN MICROENCAPSULATION OF RODENTICIDES P. B. CORNWELL, Director of Research, Rentokil Laboratories Ltd., Felcourt, E. Grinstead, Sussex, England ABSTRACT: Warfarin, zinc phosphide, norbormide and alphachloralose have been microencapsulated by the technique of coacervation and fed to laboratory rats (R. norvegicus) and mice (M. musculus). Results are given of experiments in which the concentration of rodenticide, wall material and phase ratio have been varied separately and in combination. Experiments are also reported in which normal and encapsulated rodenticide has been fed together in the same test diet. Microencapsulation can increase the intake of rodenticides, appreciably, whether or not alternative food is simultaneously available. Nevertheless, significantly higher k i l l s from higher intakes of poison have not been achieved, indicating difficulties in optimising the characteristics of the capsule wall to achieve the desired release of ingested active in- gredient.
    [Show full text]
  • Solubility and Solution-Phase Chemistry of Isocyanic Acid, Methyl Isocyanate, 2 and Cyanogen Halides 3 4 5 6 James M
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1160 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 9 November 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. 1 Solubility and Solution-phase Chemistry of Isocyanic Acid, Methyl Isocyanate, 2 and Cyanogen Halides 3 4 5 6 James M. Roberts1, and Yong Liu2 7 8 1. NOAA/ESRL Chemical Sciences Division, Boulder, Colorado, 80305 9 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Denver, Denver, Colorado, 80217 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1160 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 9 November 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. 52 Abstract 53 54 Condensed phase uptake and reaction are important atmospheric removal processes for reduced nitrogen 55 species, isocyanic acid (HNCO), methyl isocyanate (CH3NCO) and cyanogen halides (XCN, X =Cl, Br, I), yet many 56 of the fundamental quantities that govern this chemistry have not been measured or are understudied. Solubilities 57 and first-order reaction rates of these species were measured for a variety of solutions using a bubble flow reactor 58 method with total reactive nitrogen (Nr) detection. The aqueous solubility of HNCO was measured as a function of 59 pH, and exhibited the classic behavior of a weak acid, with an intrinsic Henry’s law solubility of 20 (±2) M/atm, and -4 60 a Ka of 2.0 (±0.28) ×10 M (which corresponds to pKa = 3.7 ±0.06) at 298K.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Sustainability of Anticoagulant-Based Rodent Control for Wildlife Conservation in New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Assessing the sustainability of anticoagulant-based rodent control for wildlife conservation in New Zealand A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Conservation Biology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand SUMAN PREET KAUR SRAN 2019 1 I dedicate this thesis to My Grandmother, Baljinder Kaur Sran who has loved and supported me unconditionally 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 7 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Glossary of Key Terms related to Anticoagulant Resistance ...................................................... 11 CHAPTER 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 13 Rodents in New Zealand ......................................................................................................... 14 Rattus rattus ........................................................................................................................... 14 Mus musculus .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances)
    APPENDIX A (THE LIST OF EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES) THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 75-86-5 ACETONE CYANOHYDRIN 500 10 1752-30-3 ACETONE THIOSEMICARBAZIDE 500/500 1,000 107-02-8 ACROLEIN 500 1 79-06-1 ACRYLAMIDE 500/500 5,000 107-13-1 ACRYLONITRILE 500 100 814-68-6 ACRYLYL CHLORIDE 100 100 111-69-3 ADIPONITRILE 500 1,000 116-06-3 ALDICARB 100/500 1 309-00-2 ALDRIN 500/500 1 107-18-6 ALLYL ALCOHOL 500 100 107-11-9 ALLYLAMINE 500 500 20859-73-8 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE 500 100 54-62-6 AMINOPTERIN 500/500 500 78-53-5 AMITON 500 500 3734-97-2 AMITON OXALATE 100/500 100 7664-41-7 AMMONIA 500 100 300-62-9 AMPHETAMINE 500 1,000 62-53-3 ANILINE 500 5,000 88-05-1 ANILINE,2,4,6-TRIMETHYL- 500 500 7783-70-2 ANTIMONY PENTAFLUORIDE 500 500 1397-94-0 ANTIMYCIN A 500/500 1,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 1303-28-2 ARSENIC PENTOXIDE 100/500 1 THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 1327-53-3 ARSENOUS OXIDE 100/500 1 7784-34-1 ARSENOUS TRICHLORIDE 500 1 7784-42-1 ARSINE 100 100 2642-71-9 AZINPHOS-ETHYL 100/500 100 86-50-0 AZINPHOS-METHYL 10/500 1 98-87-3 BENZAL CHLORIDE 500 5,000 98-16-8 BENZENAMINE, 3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)- 500 500 100-14-1 BENZENE, 1-(CHLOROMETHYL)-4-NITRO- 500/500 500 98-05-5 BENZENEARSONIC ACID 10/500 10 3615-21-2 BENZIMIDAZOLE, 4,5-DICHLORO-2-(TRI- 500/500 500 FLUOROMETHYL)- 98-07-7 BENZOTRICHLORIDE 100 10 100-44-7 BENZYL CHLORIDE 500 100 140-29-4 BENZYL CYANIDE 500 500 15271-41-7 BICYCLO[2.2.1]HEPTANE-2-CARBONITRILE,5-
    [Show full text]
  • RRAC Guidelines on Anticoagulant Rodenticide Resistance Management Editor: Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) of Croplife International Aim
    RRAC guidelines on Anticoagulant Rodenticide Resistance Management Editor: Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) of CropLife International Aim This document provides guidance to advisors, national authorities, professionals, practitioners and others on the nature of anticoagulant resistance in rodents, the identification of anticoagulant resistance, strategies for rodenticide application that will avoid the development of resistance and the management of resistance where it occurs. The Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) is a working group within the framework of CropLife International. Participating companies include: Bayer CropScience, BASF, LiphaTech S. A., PelGar, Rentokil Initial, Syngenta and Zapi. Senior technical specialists, with specific expertise in rodenticides, represent their companies on this committee. The RRAC is grateful to the following co-authors: Stefan Endepols, Alan Buckle, Charlie Eason, Hans-Joachim Pelz, Adrian Meyer, Philippe Berny, Kristof Baert and Colin Prescott. Photos provided by Stefan Endepols. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Classification and history of rodenticide compounds ..............................................................................................3 3. Mode of action of anticoagulant rodenticides, resistance mechanisms, and resistance mutations ......................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • High Hazard Chemical Policy
    Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual Issue Date: 2/23/2011 Policy # EHS-200.09 High Hazard Chemical Policy 1.0 PURPOSE: To minimize hazardous exposures to high hazard chemicals which include select carcinogens, reproductive/developmental toxins, chemicals that have a high degree of toxicity. 2.0 SCOPE: The procedures provide guidance to all LSUHSC personnel who work with high hazard chemicals. 3.0 REPONSIBILITIES: 3.1 Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) shall: • Provide technical assistance with the proper handling and safe disposal of high hazard chemicals. • Maintain a list of high hazard chemicals used at LSUHSC, see Appendix A. • Conduct exposure assessments and evaluate exposure control measures as necessary. Maintain employee exposure records. • Provide emergency response for chemical spills. 3.2 Principle Investigator (PI) /Supervisor shall: • Develop and implement a laboratory specific standard operation plan for high hazard chemical use per OSHA 29CFR 1910.1450 (e)(3)(i); Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories. • Notify EH&S of the addition of a high hazard chemical not previously used in the laboratory. • Ensure personnel are trained on specific chemical hazards present in the lab. • Maintain Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all chemicals, either on the computer hard drive or in hard copy. • Coordinate the provision of medical examinations, exposure monitoring and recordkeeping as required. 3.3 Employees: • Complete all necessary training before performing any work. • Observe all safety
    [Show full text]
  • List of Extremely Hazardous Substances
    Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Facility Reporting Compliance Manual List of Extremely Hazardous Substances Threshold Threshold Quantity (TQ) Reportable Planning (pounds) Quantity Quantity (Industry Use (pounds) (pounds) CAS # Chemical Name Only) (Spill/Release) (LEPC Use Only) 75-86-5 Acetone Cyanohydrin 500 10 1,000 1752-30-3 Acetone Thiosemicarbazide 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 107-02-8 Acrolein 500 1 500 79-06-1 Acrylamide 500/500 5,000 1,000/10,000 107-13-1 Acrylonitrile 500 100 10,000 814-68-6 Acrylyl Chloride 100 100 100 111-69-3 Adiponitrile 500 1,000 1,000 116-06-3 Aldicarb 100/500 1 100/10,000 309-00-2 Aldrin 500/500 1 500/10,000 107-18-6 Allyl Alcohol 500 100 1,000 107-11-9 Allylamine 500 500 500 20859-73-8 Aluminum Phosphide 500 100 500 54-62-6 Aminopterin 500/500 500 500/10,000 78-53-5 Amiton 500 500 500 3734-97-2 Amiton Oxalate 100/500 100 100/10,000 7664-41-7 Ammonia 500 100 500 300-62-9 Amphetamine 500 1,000 1,000 62-53-3 Aniline 500 5,000 1,000 88-05-1 Aniline, 2,4,6-trimethyl- 500 500 500 7783-70-2 Antimony pentafluoride 500 500 500 1397-94-0 Antimycin A 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 500/10,000 1303-28-2 Arsenic pentoxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 1327-53-3 Arsenous oxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 7784-34-1 Arsenous trichloride 500 1 500 7784-42-1 Arsine 100 100 100 2642-71-9 Azinphos-Ethyl 100/500 100 100/10,000 86-50-0 Azinphos-Methyl 10/500 1 10/10,000 98-87-3 Benzal Chloride 500 5,000 500 98-16-8 Benzenamine, 3-(trifluoromethyl)- 500 500 500 100-14-1 Benzene, 1-(chloromethyl)-4-nitro- 500/500
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Cyanogen Halides by P
    ON THE CYANOGEN HALIDES BY P. KAILASAM (From the Chemistry Department, Madras Christian College) Received July 31, 1941 (Communicated by Sir C. V. Raman, xt., F.R.S., NN.L.) I. Action of Halogens on Cyanogen Halides No observations appear to have been recorded on the action of halogens on cyanogen halides except that of chlorine on cyanogen chloride (Wurtz, 1851; Naumann and Vogt, 1870) and bromine on cyanogen bromide in ether (Poonamarew, 1885) which polymerise them to cyanuric chloride and cyanuric bromide respectively. The object of the present investigation is to study the possible displacement reactions with the cyanogen halides. The action of chlorine gas on cyanogen iodide and the action of bromine on cyanogen chloride were first studied. It was expected that chlorine would displace iodine from cyanogen iodide forming cyanogen chloride, but it was found that cyanogen iodide was not affected by dry chlorine. Dry cyanogen iodide, prepared by warming an intimate mixture of one part of iodine and two parts of AgCN, at about 40°, was sublimed into a narrow tube which could be heated in a water-bath. Dry chlorine was passed through the tube for nearly two hours. No immediate reaction occurred, and even after leaving for a week at room temperature (30°) the white needles of cyanogen iodide remained unchanged. The tube was then slowly heated, but no reaction occurred up to the sublimation temperature of cyanogen iodide (about 40°). It was found that cyanogen iodide could be sublimed unchanged in an atmosphere of dry chlorine. Since chlorine does not displace iodine from cyanogen iodide, it was thought that bromine might displace chlorine from cyanogen chloride form- ing cyanogen bromide.
    [Show full text]